Military Review

We just crush. Today, nuclear weapons are no longer enough to deter outside aggressive intentions.

67
The role of science in the creation of new weapons is constantly growing. Advanced scientific and technological advances contribute to the emergence of fundamentally different types weapons - laser, electromagnetic, informational, which qualitatively changes the appearance of the armed forces. Traditional types of weapons and military equipment are no longer able to ensure success in modern warfare. Therefore, in the race of military technology, it is important not to be an outsider.


It is characteristic that the leaders of the leading countries consider the level of development of defense science and technology not only as a guarantee of military superiority, but also as a condition for a decent positioning of the state in the world community. And this is confirmed by millennia. stories civilizations: there were evolutionary changes in the social system, wars, armed forces and means of warfare. With the advent of the first states, the need for their defense and security was created. The effectiveness of solving these tasks was determined by the forms and methods of military activity used in a particular historical period or, according to modern terminology, by basic military technologies (BVT).

Priorities

In our time it has become fashionable to talk about the innovative development of the country, about advanced, breakthrough, high and other technologies. From the excessively frequent use of the term “technology” and its derivative, “military technology”, the reader may get an idea of ​​an exceptionally favorable state of affairs in the military-technological field.

We just crush. Today, nuclear weapons are no longer enough to deter outside aggressive intentions.

However, this is not the case. Further technological improvement of weapons and military equipment is complicated by the fact that the scientific and technical reserve (NTZ), created in the Soviet period, has been practically exhausted. The set of scientific achievements and technologies focused on the implementation of weapons of the industrial age, possessing powerful damaging factors, but poor security, low selectivity, weak autonomy, lack of “flexibility” of impact, as well as a number of other properties that characterize its “intellectuality”, fulfilled its historical mission and was either embodied in existing models of weapons and military equipment, or was lost during the period of restructuring, disintegration and ill-considered conversion policy of the state.

Therefore, the imperative of time is to recreate the national defense NTRP as soon as possible, given that one of the military-strategic tasks in the name of which it is created is to contain aggression. Under the conditions of the global scientific and technological revolution, the possession of nuclear weapons can no longer remain a sufficient factor for deterring aggressive aspirations from the outside. Non-conventional types of weapons (weapons on new physical principles - ONFP), as well as qualitatively improved conventional weapons and military equipment, accumulated in themselves the latest scientific and technological achievements and technologies, over time can become one of the main tools to maintain military-strategic parity. Unfortunately, in recent years, the scientific and technical groundwork (and especially its fundamental component) has actually been the “stepchild” of the state defense order (GOZ) and work on its creation was financed according to the residual principle.

As of 2012, the degree of overlapping of the list of basic and critical military technologies by research and development commissioned by the Russian Ministry of Defense was 35 – 40 percent, and the list of priority areas of basic and exploratory research (FPI) was only 30. But at the same time, multi-billion dollar contracts were concluded for the construction of the French Mistral helicopter carriers, which, as it turned out now, are completely unsuitable for our climatic conditions, decisions were made to purchase Italian armored vehicles and other types of foreign-made weapons. At the scientific and technical councils of the Ministry of Defense, in response to proposals for the formulation of new fundamental, prospecting and applied work in priority scientific and technical areas, recommendations were often made to purchase appropriate technologies abroad. However, the legislation of a number of leading foreign countries prohibits the sale to other states of not only military, but also civilian technologies. In this regard, it is useful to recall the refusal in 2009 of the American auto concern General Motors to sell a controlling stake in Opel to the Canadian-Russian consortium Magna-Sberbank because of the risk of technology leakage.

Therefore, in the best case, our defense department, refusing to conduct its own scientific and technological research, could only rely on the provision of foreign technologies the day before yesterday. Such a policy not only did not contribute to the generation of new scientific and technological ideas by scientists and specialists of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), higher schools and industry, but also led to the loss of those positions in which domestic military technologies could compete with foreign ones.

Currently, the situation is changing for the better. The leadership of the country and the Ministry of Defense made a number of decisions related to the further development of the defense science and technology complex. In particular, 16 of October 2012 was signed by the President of the Federal Law on the Advanced Research Foundation (No. 174-FZ), the main purpose of which is to promote research and development in the interests of the country's defense and state security. new results in the military-technical, technological and socio-economic spheres. Conducted and planned (including in the part of the FPI) defense research projects in federal targeted programs (FTP). In addition, in a number of federal programs, in the Basic Scientific Research Program of the State Academies of Sciences, in the framework of projects funded by RUSNANO OJSC and the Skolkovo Foundation, as well as by grants from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and the Russian Humanitarian Foundation, prospects for dual, that is, civil and military use. At the same time, their degree of maturity has a very wide variation - from new scientific knowledge about phenomena, effects, laws and patterns of interest to the country's defense and state security, to prototyping and experimental samples of technical devices that have prospects for use in the creation of weapons and military equipment. This instills hope that the national defense NTRP will not only be restored, but also complemented by new scientific knowledge and breakthrough scientific and technical solutions.

Interagency coordination

The emergence of new structures outside the military department related to the order of military-technological research and development, the formation of relevant sections within the Federal Program should not in any way detract from the role of the Russian Defense Ministry in creating the NTR for promising conventional and non-conventional (ONFP) weapons. On the contrary, it should increase, first of all, in such areas as the substantiation of the priority directions of the development of military technologies; formation of an effective mechanism of interdepartmental coordination of research and development carried out in the State Armaments Program (GWP), federal target programs, programs of the Russian Academy of Sciences and with the support of research and innovation funds; examination of scientific and technological projects of a defense nature.


Unfortunately, the formation of a mechanism for interdepartmental coordination in the field of creating a defense NTRP is currently at the very initial stage, and there is practically no information interaction between various ministries and departments in this field. This situation is unacceptable, since in the near future it will be necessary not only to coordinate the relevant sections of the LG and FTP, but also to organize joint work in the formation of the State Armaments Program for the 2016 – 2025 years. Indeed, according to the federal law of the Russian Federation on 29 December 2012 of the year No. 275-ФЗ “On the state defense order”, state-owned R & D customers for the creation of new production technologies for weapons and military equipment can now be not only federal executive bodies with armed forces formations (as it was written down in the previous version of the law), but also other federal authorities ensuring the delivery of products for the state defense order, in particular, the Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russia and Roscosmos.

The adoption of the new edition of the law “On State Defense Order” almost coincided with the beginning of the formation of new departments within the Ministry of Defense related to scientific and innovative activities, in addition to those created during the Soviet period, have proven their efficiency decades and survived in times like the general collapse of the beginning of the 90-ies, and ill-considered reforms of recent years. Therefore, along with interdepartmental coordination, well-coordinated, balanced, constructive work of all military administration bodies associated with the development of military technologies is required, regardless of which intra-departmental "trunk" they belong to. Work aimed not at dragging the rope in the part of the corresponding functionality, but at achieving synergy effect from the efforts of all stakeholders in terms of maintaining the proper level and further building up the scientific and technical potential for promising conventional weapons and arming on new physical principles. At the same time, one should listen as little as possible to the advice of people who have long lost contact with the state’s military organization and who are unable to adequately assess the current realities.


Interdepartmental coordination should include not only interaction in the formation and implementation of the relevant program activities of the LG and FTP, but also joint activities to develop and adjust the governing and organizational-methodological documents, to some extent affecting the military-technological area. These are primarily documents defining the objectives of the state science and technology and technology policy (the Fundamentals of the Russian Federation’s policy in the development of science and technology, the Fundamentals of the military-technical policy of the Russian Federation) and the priority directions for the development of military technologies (Priority directions for the development of science, technology and equipment in the Russian Federation, the List of critical technologies of the Russian Federation, the List of basic and critical military technologies). Of particular importance is the importance of forecasting the achievable results of scientific research and technological development, which is one of the main decision support tools in the management of the development of military technologies.

The increase in the requirements for the quality of programs and plans for the creation of military technologies necessitates an improvement in the methodology of the program-targeted planning (PCP) of their development. The PCP methodology used in practice must have the necessary flexibility and adaptive properties that allow for the prompt consideration of the interests of the various departments involved in this process.

In the interests of the Ministry of Defense

For the development of military technologies, the main tasks of the military department include:

  • coordinating the development of a unified data base system (ESID) for program-oriented support of the implementation of the military-technical policy of the Russian Federation for 2016 – 2025 for the list of basic and critical military technologies, as well as the priority areas of fundamental, predictive and exploratory research in the interests of defense and security of the Russian Federation Federation;
  • coordinating the development, within the framework of planned R & D, of a methodology for the substantiation and formation of program activities related to the creation of a NTP for promising conventional and non-conventional (ONFP) weapons;
  • implementation of the functions of the state customer in the part of fundamental, forecast, prospecting and applied research and development works in the interests of creating and improving military technologies carried out within the relevant sections of the LG;
  • organization of interaction with the security agencies of the Russian Federation, the state corporation Rosatom, the Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russia, Roscosmos in terms of conducting research on the development of military technologies and the implementation of their results;
  • monitoring the results of research conducted by organizations of the Russian Academy of Sciences, higher education, industry, public academies of sciences in the framework of federal and departmental scientific and technological programs, as well as grants from scientific foundations, and identifying the most important scientific, technical and technological achievements in order to use them in the interests of developing promising and modernization of existing models of weapons and military equipment, search for new forms and methods of warfare;
  • the formation and maintenance of a single information bank of the most important achievements of national science and military technologies obtained under the LG, and information exchange with other interested ministries and departments;
  • participation in the examination of proposals for the selection of works funded through the Advanced Research Foundation, as well as defense financial institutions, to be carried out under the Federal Program;
  • organization of exhibitions and demonstrations of scientific and technical achievements and military technologies obtained within the framework of the state-owned program, as well as participation in organizing and holding defense conferences and seminars in cooperation with research organizations of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Rosatom State Corporation, Roskosmos, the Ministry of Industry and Trade and the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia .

    One of the organizations that can make a significant contribution to solving the tasks of the Ministry of Defense in the development of military technologies is the Russian Academy of Rocket and Artillery Sciences. The possible directions of the Academy’s activities in this area primarily include the development of conceptual, normative, and scientific and methodological documents related to the creation and development of military technologies; elaboration and approbation of the mechanisms for carrying out an independent examination of similar documents developed by various departments; evaluation of the latest achievements of domestic science and technology for their possible use in the creation of promising models of weapons and military equipment; conducting research in the field of pricing for military products in terms of the creation of military technologies; carrying out, within the framework of targeted forecasts, work on priority areas of scientific research and technological development with an analysis of the possibility of implementing their results in developing promising and modernizing existing weapons and military equipment and evaluating the level of increase in their military-technical effectiveness.
  • Author:
    67 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

    I have an account? Sign in

    1. Artmark
      Artmark 22 May 2013 15: 14 New
      17
      Russia must be strong! With a strong science, army and spirit !! good
      1. Forget
        Forget 22 May 2013 16: 59 New
        11
        Quote: ArtMark

        and for this we need to do a quality education ....
        1. Artmark
          Artmark 22 May 2013 18: 50 New
          +3
          those who know their work perfectly (pros) and most importantly, be patriots of their homeland should work in any field !!! hi
      2. Genady1976
        Genady1976 22 May 2013 18: 47 New
        0
        Yes, I’ll kill them all from a slingshot if angry
        1. Nick
          Nick 22 May 2013 20: 42 New
          +2
          Quote: Genady1976
          Yes, I’ll kill them all from a slingshot if

          Well, well, some tried to throw their hats ...
          1. Genady1976
            Genady1976 22 May 2013 21: 41 New
            0
            NOT caps and a slingshot fool
        2. skeptic
          skeptic 22 May 2013 21: 22 New
          0
          Quote: Genady1976
          Yes, I’ll kill them all from a slingshot if Th angry


          Yes, without a bazaar, if a slingshot will bullet, at least with nuclear pebbles or something steeper. lol
    2. Tarpon
      Tarpon 22 May 2013 15: 19 New
      16
      Quote: ArtMark
      Russia must be strong! With a strong science, army and spirit !! good

      And a strong economy, as little dependent on the West as possible.
      1. Artmark
        Artmark 22 May 2013 15: 30 New
        +1
        I agree! And without a strong economy, nothing is possible good
      2. Interface
        Interface 22 May 2013 15: 35 New
        21
        In the 1929 year, I.V. Stalin said: "Either we will run a path equal to a century over these 10 years or they will crush us ...." Today is the same situation.
        1. Orik
          Orik 22 May 2013 15: 50 New
          +7
          Only now there is less time left. Quote from Sulakshin SS:
          And of course, there is great concern that the system is being broken. The country is led to geopolitical destruction. Too all this is systematically done. The forecast at the time of the "test" is 2020-2021. Sharp instability will increase from 2018.
        2. nickname 1 and 2
          nickname 1 and 2 22 May 2013 16: 44 New
          +1
          Quote: Interface
          Today is the same situation.


          Yes? And therefore everything is = march to Bolotnaya?

          Before they were rebuilt and before they were transformed and before demacratized?

          Yesterday, the devastation in the country for 20 years = today is a super state with a super economy?

          schaaas! I'll do everything....! I’ll tear the current from my beard ...
          1. Interface
            Interface 22 May 2013 17: 27 New
            +3
            After the civil war and the first world war in Russia:
            1. Destroyed industry to the ground.
            2. Weakened and poorly armed army.
            3. General non-recognition of the position of the Soviet leadership in the world, non-recognition of the USSR itself
            BUT IN THE COUNTRY DURING THE 5 YEARS, THE USSR EXCEEDED ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF ALL COUNTRIES OF EUROPE BECAME THE 2-TH IN THE WORLD THE INDUSTRIAL POWER, BUILT UP THE MIC. The question of the price of these “breakthroughs” is a completely different conversation, but the fact remains: after all, after a devastation, it is possible to build a strong mobilization economy and provide a standard of living for a new generation of citizens, at least the urban population. This is despite the fact that the situation in Russia today is better than in the aforementioned 1929 year, so we should not start from scratch.
            1. vadson
              vadson 22 May 2013 23: 49 New
              0
              Stalin raised the economy with the help of the same usa, trained personnel with the support of the same usa, and in the usa itself there was a great depression at that time, which is why they helped us and solved their problems. Who will help us now? if the states will again have a great depression 2.0 then not far off the third world
              1. Uhalus
                Uhalus 23 May 2013 02: 16 New
                +1
                Everything is correct. Yes, but we do not have Stalin ... And, it seems, will not. And the people are no longer becoming that; the new generation does not want to work. It’s sad.
          2. BDRM 667
            BDRM 667 23 May 2013 04: 54 New
            0
            Quote: nick 1 and 2
            Yes? And therefore everything is = march to Bolotnaya?

            Marsh should be forced to WORK, and not a rally ...
        3. pahom54
          pahom54 22 May 2013 16: 53 New
          +4
          I agree with the author.
          Most people need to realize this and not blaspheme the country's leadership for the money spent on the country's defense. And to Stalin’s dictum, you can add Bonaparte’s earlier statement: A country that does not want to feed its own army will feed someone else’s. "
          At the present stage, it is necessary not only to rearm the army, but also to invest money in science and industry, and without a strong economy such money can not be found.
          1. aksakal
            aksakal 22 May 2013 23: 09 New
            0
            Quote: pahom54
            I agree with the author.

            - and the article of minuses was thrust -)))). The article and the article, the usual analytical and boring article, but they certainly didn’t deserve such cons -)))
            1. biglow
              biglow 23 May 2013 14: 42 New
              0
              The article was bombarded because the author came up with some alarmist name for her. Nobody will doubt us. One hit with a single missile in any large American city is enough for America to leave any war and sit at the negotiating table. For this, nuclear weapons as a deterrence weapon are needed.
    3. Regis
      Regis 22 May 2013 15: 19 New
      35
      Now, so that we would not be “crushed,” you need to learn to do just two things:
      1) Give birth
      2) To educate
      We can do the rest.
      1. Gemar
        Gemar 22 May 2013 15: 49 New
        23
        Quote: Regis
        1) Give birth
        2) To educate

        I support you!
        Just so that we are not “crushed”, I would suggest adjusting your proposal:

        1) Give birth and bring up.
        2) Reveal and shoot (plant).

        While in our country there will be Red and Tuburetkins, he will prefer to give birth and bring up people abroad.
        1. a
          a 22 May 2013 19: 36 New
          -9
          You would all need to plant someone or shoot. not yet planted and not shot ?? maybe stop your people shoot?
          1. Garrin
            Garrin 22 May 2013 22: 11 New
            +4
            Quote: uno
            You would all need to plant someone or shoot. not yet planted and not shot ?? maybe stop your people shoot?

            By shooting one scum, you can save hundreds and thousands of normal people.
        2. Setrac
          Setrac 23 May 2013 05: 34 New
          +1
          Quote: Gamar
          While in our country there will be Red and Tuburetkins, he will prefer to give birth and bring up people abroad.

          Here for this 23 plus set? Just the Reds and Taburetkins bring up abroad, and then turned down about the people! Dear, are your children also brought up abroad?
      2. Sleptsoff
        Sleptsoff 22 May 2013 16: 28 New
        -32
        Right! Russia needs more cannon fodder!
      3. nickname 1 and 2
        nickname 1 and 2 22 May 2013 16: 50 New
        +8
        Quote: Regis
        1) Give birth


        DO NOT drink - a year old (Schaub freaks not done)

        Do not drink - a year old (Schaub remember how they are doing)

        Do not drink - a year old (Schaub to find one that wants to give birth from thee)
        1. Gemar
          Gemar 22 May 2013 17: 05 New
          +7
          Quote: nick 1 and 2
          DO NOT drink - a year old (Schaub freaks not done)

          Do not drink - a year old (Schaub remember how they are doing)

          Do not drink - a year old (Schaub to find one that wants to give birth from thee)

          And still do not drink a year to find one who does not smoke, does not drink, and knows what “abortion” is only by hearsay.
          Threat Understand me correctly, in Russia it is easy to find a girl, find out her parents, etc. But while living in China, I ran into a problem ... If it’s beautiful, then it’s necessarily courageous. I myself am courageous, which means that my wife should be a “restraining factor” for me. Therefore, the last two girls were Muslim ... Now, I partly regret that I did not marry one of them.
          I look at a girl in Suifenhe ... she is 16 years old (a beautiful infection), and she is already a local club star. I would not want to marry the one who made me and my friends "brothers."
          Therefore, Regis correctly said:
          Quote: Regis
          2) To educate
          1. Perch_xnumx
            Perch_xnumx 22 May 2013 18: 35 New
            +3
            Therefore, Regis correctly said:

            I will upset you. Our youth is brought up by the Internet, VKontakte, twitter, computer shooters, tough nuts in cinemas, iPods, tablets, as well as clubs, parties, casantypes and other empty things. Instead of being brought up on the books of classics, playing sports, outdoor activities. And the product turns out to be appropriate.
            1. a
              a 22 May 2013 19: 40 New
              0
              So in other countries, youth is also brought up - parties, iPads and iPods. So what? the economy is not like ours. science is not our couple. how so
              1. Regis
                Regis 22 May 2013 22: 06 New
                +2
                Quote: uno
                So in other countries, youth is also brought up - parties, iPads and iPods. So what? the economy is not like ours. science is not our couple. how so

                What are you talking about? About the fact that there are countries with more successful economies? Well, let's say that there is. As well as there are countries that invest much more in science. But there is still no huge difference (which Russia could not overcome) between us. And if you recall that our country was thrown back at least two decades ago “thanks” to Yeltsin and the company. That lag will not seem so big to you. And still, despite the disaster of the 90s, there are industries in which we are leading.
                1. Sleptsoff
                  Sleptsoff 23 May 2013 16: 18 New
                  -1
                  Yeltsin and the company are just an excuse for no one has imposed it on us, it was the people's choice. And as for the industries in which we are leading, you can name them as an example, I'm just wondering what today's Russia is famous for.
                  1. Regis
                    Regis 23 May 2013 22: 05 New
                    0
                    Quote: Sleptsoff
                    Yeltsin and the company are just an excuse for no one has imposed it on us, it was the people's choice. And as for the industries in which we are leading, you can name them as an example, I'm just wondering what today's Russia is famous for.

                    Well, you can’t be so sad to troll;) especially on this site. In general, you can drive in Google something about the delivery of astronauts to the ISS or about nuclear power plants, please do not forget our "defense system" either.
                    1. Sleptsoff
                      Sleptsoff 27 May 2013 16: 45 New
                      -2
                      I won’t even google, because of everything that you called, we are famous only for safe power plants and the defense industry, we are not even famous for it, we just kept our positions, amers ranked 1st in export. Our launch vehicles are just a temporary measure, just the Americans are going to move to a new level, so to speak, so they took a break, as they say, a step backward for two forwards. The defense industry and nuclear energy is certainly good, but how it helps a simple Russian to live better is stupid money to the budget. We are not famous for high-quality food, electronics, clothing, that is, things necessary for life, all this is imported.
    4. Aristarch
      Aristarch 22 May 2013 15: 19 New
      +3
      Not everything is perfect in science and production, but things are going, we have to work.
    5. plotnikov561956
      plotnikov561956 22 May 2013 15: 21 New
      +2
      I read it diagonally .. It seems to be happy for the Motherland, but somehow it’s muddy from the very title of the article .. as if I had raised my hands already ...
    6. Lech from ZATULINKI
      Lech from ZATULINKI 22 May 2013 15: 23 New
      20
      I am concerned about the SOAP BUBBLE called -SKOLKOVO.
      There was a strong conviction that this project was created for the TRANSFER OF MONEY OF RUSSIAN TAXPAYERS INTO POCKETS OF DIFFERENT CHUBAIS and
      budgets of AMERICAN UNIVERSITIES.
      I do not believe in the good intentions of this CHUBAIS FRAUD.
      1. aviator65
        aviator65 22 May 2013 16: 36 New
        +6
        Why else could this venture be started? Do we have few academic campuses that were created back in the Soviet era and worked very efficiently until oxygen was blocked by the new government, and along with all of science in the country? First, the education system was mutilated, having produced a bunch of lawyers, economists and other managers, but now these “specialists” will lead us along the path of creating high technology. Achievements are already on the face. I myself saw several car washes, on the signs of which the NANO prefix proudly flaunted. The Chubais case lives and wins!
        1. Captain45
          Captain45 22 May 2013 21: 06 New
          0
          Quote: aviator65
          I myself saw several car washes, on the signs of which the NANO prefix proudly flaunted. The Chubais case lives and wins!

          And not only car washes, it’s already been 2 years ago how to buy socks and underpants made using nano-technologies. They only cost more than usual in 2-3, but there’s no difference.
          1. Egen
            Egen 23 May 2013 05: 38 New
            0
            Quote: Captain45
            socks and underpants made by nano-technologies. They only cost in 2-3 more expensive than usual, but there is no difference.

            why not, it just is not visible ........ :)))
      2. nickname 1 and 2
        nickname 1 and 2 22 May 2013 16: 37 New
        -3
        Quote: Lech from ZATULINKI
        SOAP BUBBLE called -SKOLKOVO.


        Go work there!
      3. Grishka100watt
        Grishka100watt 23 May 2013 08: 29 New
        0
        Zhores Alferov said that things are going quietly in skolkovo, and that there is no need to panic)
    7. Melchakov
      Melchakov 22 May 2013 15: 23 New
      +2
      Something title with content is not going well request . EMLO (this is my personal opinion).
    8. tttttt
      tttttt 22 May 2013 15: 28 New
      13
      Military science and defense should be in the hands of the state and not private shops.

      And the worldview principles of the Russian spirit are built on 5 Horde principles "above":

      - power is higher than property,
      - service above possession,
      - justice is above the law,
      -general above private,
      -spiritual above material.
      1. SASCHAmIXEEW
        SASCHAmIXEEW 22 May 2013 16: 04 New
        +3
        Great principles! It is necessary with mother’s milk, to give it to children, and even in school you need to put it at the forefront! Who does not agree, let him get out of RUSSIA !!!
        1. a
          a 22 May 2013 19: 43 New
          -2
          some ugly principles. if you do not agree, get out. a person may have a different opinion, but at the same time he loves his country. or do you think those who think differently a priori do not like their country?
          1. tttttt
            tttttt 22 May 2013 23: 56 New
            +1
            A parasite that sucks blood from its victim also loves it ...
    9. Mr. Truth
      Mr. Truth 22 May 2013 15: 32 New
      +6
      Russia needs not only powerful strategic nuclear forces but also powerful conventional forces suitable for any war. No need to follow the western path of building the armed forces, we have our own experience more suitable to our conditions.
    10. treskoed
      treskoed 22 May 2013 15: 34 New
      +3
      There is no real alternative to nuclear weapons yet! Talking about "innovations" and "military technologies" there is a desire to destroy the country's nuclear shield in advance as if it were supposedly outdated against the background of these "innovations"!
    11. Arberes
      Arberes 22 May 2013 15: 38 New
      +7
      In Soviet times, they did not spare money for science and scholars were cherished and cherished! And the primary education with which it all begins, how powerful it was! I have long noticed how inconsistent, and it’s stupid (to be honest) some "reforms" are underway. They are trying to build everything under the Western model, and then breaking a bunch of firewood, they begin to recall our Soviet experience (it turns out to be not so bad compared to the Western one)!
      Why do we always first to the bottom, and then ...
      It is necessary to increase funding by orders of magnitude in science and not make stupid and abrupt movements like the well-known Minister of Livanov to us all!
      To create excellent conditions for new scientific personnel, including foreign ones. We all know perfectly well the practice of some states on the re-purchase of brains, as they say would be money?
      The state has money (oil, gas, forest, etc. resources). That's all you can do well to make a start and make a breakthrough!
      And we can do it and must!
      Otherwise, the price is worthless to us, as a mighty power or empire, who do you like?
      1. SASCHAmIXEEW
        SASCHAmIXEEW 22 May 2013 16: 08 New
        +3
        Livanov is an indicator of the entire cabinet, led by the Mendel !!! How much to endure it !! Guarantor, where are you?
        1. aviator65
          aviator65 22 May 2013 16: 40 New
          +6
          The guarantor and the prime minister are twin brothers ... Then you can follow Mayakovsky laughing .
    12. Alexey Prikazchikov
      Alexey Prikazchikov 22 May 2013 15: 41 New
      +2
      An article can be described in one phrase- Give money.
    13. Committee
      Committee 22 May 2013 15: 42 New
      +8
      I didn’t want to go to this site anymore, but the title of the article was outraged: “there aren’t enough nuclear weapons, they will crush us” Yes, there would be political will, all of us could be sent to hell. And I assure you, it would have been oh as "enough." And if we continue to squash, and have fun, we will surrender us with both “weapons” and without “weapons”.
      1. zvereok
        zvereok 22 May 2013 20: 01 New
        +3
        The dad doesn’t seem to be given to us by Belarusians. It remains only to Assad to lure - like a man with eggs.
    14. shinobi
      shinobi 22 May 2013 15: 48 New
      +3
      It’s a murky article. In order to be crushed, Russia should go down to the pre-revolutionary level in terms of scientific and technical potential. And provided that there is no nuclear weapons at all, and the result is not guaranteed, as the Russian man remains. With his peace and patience, on the one hand, and a genetic love for a good fight on the other. A similar kind of article, a classic example of information war. As if advocating power, the idea of ​​the futility of any actions and attempts to resist is suggested implicitly.
      1. Volkhov
        Volkhov 22 May 2013 20: 15 New
        +1
        Quote: shinobi
        .To crush us, Russia must fall in scientific and technological potential to a pre-revolutionary level.

        This partly happened - supplying the Arab Spring consumed AK 74, 47 of the mobile reserves, it remained the royal - Mosinki and Maxim. A Russian man is overfed with bromine and can only get drunk with a neighbor.
        But "us" will not be crushed, because "we" are not needed - everything happens besides "our" understanding.
        1. vadson
          vadson 23 May 2013 00: 01 New
          0
          At what way did Russia supply the Arab spring? there are most likely Chinese AK, and options from the former social camp of the post-European Europe. Yes, and in their warehouses another 17 million
    15. knn54
      knn54 22 May 2013 16: 33 New
      +5
      Who would dare to deal with Gaddafi or Saddam Hussein if they had nuclear potential? "Asks Major General Amir Eshel, head of the planning department of the Israeli army." No one would dare! ”
      Who argues that the Weapons must be modern and capable of effectively repelling enemy aggression. We need to spend money on modern weapons and do not waste money on weapons that do not meet the modern requirements of the military conflict. Everything is easy to calculate, but is this just what the military lobby needs on the one hand and the State Department on the other?
      PS General Kevin P. Chilton, head of the US Strategic Command from 2007 to 2011, told the Washington Post columnist Walter Pincus in 2010 that "over the 65-year history of nuclear weapons, no nuclear power has been conquered or even exposed the risk of conquest. ”On the other hand, countries that agreed to demand their weapons of mass destruction were soon conquered by countries that have nuclear weapons in abundance and are not about to abandon them!
      PPS And against hundreds of Islamist militants, members of ethnic organized crime groups, including drug mafia infiltrated into migrant flows, nuclear weapons really will not help.
    16. individual
      individual 22 May 2013 16: 33 New
      +3
      Sinobi complacently calls the article "muddy" ???

      This is fundamentally wrong. The development of science and technological progress makes it possible to cause a damaging effect without nuclear damaging factors. At present, nuclear weapons are a deterrent against aggression and unacceptable damage to the attacker.
      I will refer to the observer, where he rightly emphasizes:
      "Advanced scientific and technological achievements contribute to the emergence of fundamentally different types of weapons - laser, electromagnetic, information, which qualitatively changes the face of the armed forces. Traditional types of military equipment are no longer able to ensure success in modern warfare. Therefore, it is important not to be an outsider in the race of military technology."
      Task Russian STRATEG refuse and abolish the promise of the doctrine that generals are fighting with past tactics and past instruments of war.
      The task of the leadership of Russia, create a powerful economy able to say "a new word in reliable defense support of the country.
    17. Black
      Black 22 May 2013 16: 48 New
      +2
      I do not understand why the article grabbed negative ratings.
      The country is not alive with a single nuclear weapon and its interests are defended. Science and technology are the basis of a developing economy, the welfare of the country, and its defense capability. I think this is and will be the priority of any country that wants to be independent. And if for this it is necessary to "tighten", the people will understand.
    18. saw486
      saw486 22 May 2013 16: 56 New
      +2
      I do not see anything muddy in the article. The complexity of the problem, yes. It is necessary to carry out many different and complex events in order to accomplish all this. If the Americans had, for example, 25-30 years ago, a system capable of planning the artillery fire of the entire army corps in 106 seconds, then at that time we spent on average 3 hours for division artillery.
      And it is also necessary to exclude from practice, when the worst examples, ideas, etc. are known. accepted by acquaintance and personal sympathy.
      1. Setrac
        Setrac 23 May 2013 05: 46 New
        +1
        Quote: saw486
        If the Americans had, for example, 25-30 years ago, a system capable of planning the artillery fire of the entire army corps in 106 seconds, then at that time we allocated an average of 3 hours for the artillery of the division.

        And whom did they defeat with the help of their miracle system? Iraqis pushed them in the horns in the first Iraqi. Can they shoot without electronics? Or will the Germans again throw them into the Atlantic?
    19. USNik
      USNik 22 May 2013 16: 59 New
      +2
      Something title with content is not going well

      An article can be described in one phrase- Give money.

      Some kind of muddy article.

      I completely agree. Belolentochny = defeatist nonsense, starting with the name (yeah, they got it right and crumpled, the trap hasn’t grown yet), continuing with hints of “other types of weapons” (Hello to patrols and Khabensky?) That only Rusnano could have invented in half from Skolkovo (just give money and do not ask for the result 10 years), and ending with instructions on who and whom should manage and who should obey whom. Article solid 1.
      1. djon3volta
        djon3volta 22 May 2013 19: 57 New
        +2
        Quote: USNik
        I completely agree. Belolentochny = defeatist delirium, starting with the name (yeah, they got it right and crumpled, the trap hasn’t grown yet), continuing with hints of “other weapons”

        Well, why is it immediately nonsense? If you blow the Afghan, the white-winged one well, then it’s quite possible to write something different wassat
        because those who write similar and not only articles, they do not write them for free wink after all, there’s the main one on the vpk website, there are editors, because they don’t work somewhere in parallel (like a taxi driver works on the vpk website), they consciously write articles and get interest or monthly satisfaction for their writings. would they write openly? NO OF FINAL !!! never in my life would they publish this, even if the USSR did not have a single nuclear bomb. because sowing panic is harmful and fraught with unpredictability of the population.
        Why do you think there are no articles about how Russia destroys the United States? Have you read such articles? No, I haven’t come across, but why do you think? I guessed?
    20. Komodo
      Komodo 22 May 2013 17: 01 New
      -1
      Do you think ???Zaeuuttsya !!
      The peepie is short. Avtor, do not bzdi !! am
      I apologize for my French.
    21. adg76
      adg76 22 May 2013 17: 12 New
      +3
      To begin with, it must be honestly acknowledged that war is inevitable. Then clearly determine with whom and how much time we have. To develop accelerated plans for the rearmament and rearmament of the army. Work out the issues of civil defense. Check mobilization potential. Take time for the partisan movement. Set specific directions for the development of promising weapons in a specific time frame. Clearly understand what plants and factories work for defense in the event of war. Who submits to whom (In a word, a register of public and private organizations in case of war with specifically prescribed functions). In a word, repeat what was before the Second World War and during the war
      1. Setrac
        Setrac 23 May 2013 05: 50 New
        0
        Quote: adg76
        Take time for the partisan movement.

        What kind of mood? You don’t have to bring this up!
        Quote: adg76
        To develop accelerated plans for the rearmament and rearmament of the army.

        What kind of miracle weapons should be produced instead of those available or being produced now?
    22. Strashila
      Strashila 22 May 2013 17: 21 New
      +1
      Of course ... the fifth column in the government and the army of gastric migrants ... 15 million, this is serious.
    23. Vtel
      Vtel 22 May 2013 18: 04 New
      +2
      Yes, here pulls for the candidate. It wouldn’t be so good, but it wouldn’t be bad if “our” big-headed authorities in the power of these most beautiful schemes and plans didn’t plunder the people's money.
    24. awacs
      awacs 22 May 2013 18: 28 New
      0
      Who wouldn’t come up with that !!! Fight all one infantry in the fields of our vast country!
    25. annenkov242
      annenkov242 22 May 2013 18: 55 New
      0
      Quote: Interface
      In the 1929 year, I.V. Stalin said: "Either we will run a path equal to a century over these 10 years or they will crush us ...." Today is the same situation.


      So you need Stalin!
      And the whole historical situation ...
    26. zvereok
      zvereok 22 May 2013 19: 59 New
      +3
      Quote: Arberes
      They are trying to build everything under the Western model, and then breaking a bunch of firewood, they begin to recall our Soviet experience (it turns out to be not so bad compared to the Western one)!
      Why do we always first to the bottom, and then ...


      And then, they begin to restore the good Soviet models. Yes, byad - the same people are recovering. And if they aren’t, then they are the same from other sections, and there is something to rebuild according to the Western model in other places (((in the end, Chubais, Chubais, Chubais ....
    27. varov14
      varov14 22 May 2013 20: 05 New
      +1
      Not a damn thing will happen, Medvedev called Russia's budget precrisis, the wrong people rule and direct. We do not need to conquer, we allow ourselves to be replaced by others.
    28. The comment was deleted.
    29. Budilnik
      Budilnik 22 May 2013 20: 11 New
      +2
      RUSNANO and Skolovo are run by odious cosmopolitans who, apart from profit, have no other aspirations for the prosperity and strengthening of Russia. They have already noted famous stories on sawing up state money. Chubais and Vekselberg to strengthen their defenses would be ridiculous if it weren’t for defense and the very existence of our state . It’s sad and pay attention to the activities of Medvedev whom he attracts to his anti-Russian team ...
    30. Borat
      Borat 22 May 2013 21: 04 New
      +2
      An idiotic headline! It is the presence of nuclear weapons today that is a guarantee of deterring aggressive aspirations from the outside!

      As for scientific research in the military field, they are necessary, but you should not get stuck in an arms race with the West. Most Western developments are driven by economic reasons, rather than combat effectiveness and development prospects.
    31. Parabellum
      Parabellum 22 May 2013 21: 10 New
      +2
      Nuclear weapons are not enough to deter aggressive aspirations from the outside? Only due to the presence of nuclear weapons for the past 60 years there has been no global military conflict and in the next 20 to 30 years a more powerful deterrent is not expected.
    32. Bresh
      Bresh 22 May 2013 21: 23 New
      +2
      Quote: Regis
      Now, so that we would not be “crushed,” you need to learn to do just two things:
      1) Give birth
      2) To educate
      We can do the rest.


      How nice to know that you are not alone)) !!! Give birth, raise in love for mother and motherland.
      The question of demography is the main one, but unfortunately they don’t hear us and don’t help us ....
    33. lemal
      lemal 22 May 2013 22: 02 New
      0
      Come on guys !!!
    34. sergeybulkin
      sergeybulkin 22 May 2013 22: 04 New
      0
      Enta article is clearly part of someone's dissertation, or report at the conference, judging by the abundance of abbreviations. Bullshit she - I must say bluntly.
    35. 1goose3
      1goose3 22 May 2013 22: 06 New
      +2
      Quote: Budilnik
      RUSNANO and Skolovo are run by odious cosmopolitans who, apart from profit, have no other aspirations regarding the prosperity and strengthening of Russia


      A member of the international council of a foreign bank Chubais is the head of RUSNANO and we hope that this is RUSNANO fully working for Russia, including for the defense of Russia!? no
    36. Wolf3000
      Wolf3000 22 May 2013 22: 50 New
      +2
      In order for some kind of development to begin in the country, it is necessary to change the system and expel traitors usurpers from the Kremlin. In the meantime, liberal-sovereign democrats who have been destroying the country since 1991 will remain in power, Russia has no prospects. Only pumping out resources, over-enrichment of elites and bureaucracy, reduction and degradation of the population. And the armed forces now carry out only two functions: strategic nuclear forces, to prevent external creeps into the oil and gas shares of the elite and the brigade of a new look, to suppress a possible rebellion and the fight against terrorism.
    37. Egen
      Egen 23 May 2013 05: 41 New
      0
      Wait guys, what you write is all clear.
      But I didn’t understand something else.
      In the article they write that type ice has gone, for example, laws adopted in 2012 are cited. In any case, the new minister has not yet managed to accept anything from what is written here. So it turns out it was all under the former stool, is it his merit? How then is he bad? Or is it good on the 1 side but not on the 2? I did not understand anything in our state :(
    38. gregor6549
      gregor6549 23 May 2013 06: 16 New
      0
      What kind of hysteria is "out of control" and since when has nuclear missile weapons ceased to be considered a deterrent? Of course, science and technology, including military, need to be developed, who argues with this. But reacting to any Wunderwaff of the USA and its allies is also not worth it. Already reacted at one time to the bullshit of "Star Wars" Reagan and were left without pants. And bullshit is still bullshit still, despite the feverish attempts of its authors to prove the opposite. Well, these authors can be understood. Such money swelled, but to no avail. And why is this for Russia? Moreover, there is no extra money and is not expected. God forbid to put your armed forces in order, give them real weapons and teach them to use them correctly today, and not to dream of a fantastic weapon that is planned to be created "the day after tomorrow" without money, personnel, or anything else.
      After all, all those who reassure people with statements that something “super duper” will definitely appear after 2020 or 2030 of the year are well aware that they will be able to cut big money for it tomorrow, and after 30 of the year neither the money nor the “printers” themselves promises "no one can get. And if anyone gets it, then it’s mainly the “switchmen”, as in the case of Taburetkin, Chubais, etc., are strongly “progressive” and “leaders ahead”. Here they are completely pulled by the "looking around the zone", and without the right to correspondence.
    39. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 23 May 2013 08: 48 New
      +5
      Why is China so successful in its economy and population growth? Because both there and there are no pi-owls fellow
    40. adg76
      adg76 23 May 2013 09: 16 New
      0
      Quote: Setrac
      What kind of mood? You don’t have to bring this up!

      History teaches this
    41. adg76
      adg76 23 May 2013 09: 23 New
      0
      Quote: Setrac
      Quote: adg76
      To develop accelerated plans for the rearmament and rearmament of the army.

      What kind of miracle weapons should be produced instead of those available or being produced now?

      Miracle weapons are not needed. But the shells in warehouses need those that are suitable for the gun, and not those that are disposed of. Clearly know how much, where, why. This is a simple children's example. As an option, the story with the "Sharks." There is a boat, no missiles. Now there will be no boats