Military Review

Iraq initialed a new agreement on the supply of Russian weapons

19

Iraq initiates new supply agreement weapons from Russia after the scandalous cancellation of the previous treaty, said on Wednesday the deputy of the Iraqi parliament from the State Law bloc of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki Ali ash-Shalia.


“The Iraqi delegation initialized a new defense agreement in Russia a few days ago, including heavy and medium-heavy equipment for the same amount that was specified in the previous contract, canceled due to corruption,” the MP said, RIA reports.News».

As the newspaper VIEW, reported recently, a contract for the supply of Russian weapons to Iraq has received contradictory information. So, 4 in March, Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari said that Russia would provide the country with helicopters and air defense batteries before the summer.

Three days before the FSMTC, Alexander Fomin, said that Russia and Iraq had not signed contracts for the supply of weapons and military equipment.

February 13 General Director of Rosoboronexport OJSC Anatoly Isaykin informed that contracts with 2012 billion dollars were concluded with Iraq in 4,5 year, but they have not yet entered into force.

Recall that in October last year, the Kremlin’s press service reported that Russia and Iraq during the visit of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki to Moscow concluded a package agreement in the field of military-technical cooperation worth 4,2 billion dollars.

However, on November 10, Western mass media, citing Iraqi government spokesman Ali Mousavi, spread information that the Iraqi leadership canceled an agreement with Russia for the purchase of weapons worth $ 4,2 billion due to suspicions of corruption.

Later, Iraqi Defense Minister Saadun ad-Dulaimi called false information about the cancellation of the contract. He also refuted the statements of the representative of the Prime Minister of Iraq Nouri al-Maliki Ali Mousavi that a corruption component was found in the deal.

In December, Putin discussed with Nuri al-Maliki the implementation of the agreements that were reached in October.
Originator:
http://www.vz.ru
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. JonnyT
    JonnyT 28 March 2013 10: 58 New
    +4
    And what does initialed mean? 7 ??
    1. Dimani
      Dimani 28 March 2013 11: 05 New
      +6
      it means pre-signing
    2. Papakiko
      Papakiko 28 March 2013 11: 07 New
      +9
      Quote: JonnyT
      And that means initialed

      Etymology
      Comes from the french. parapher "to wax; sign ”, further from paraphe“ stroke; sight ", from the average. lat paraphus, distortion. lat paragraphus "paragraph", dates back to Greek. παραγραφή “subscript of the sign, paragraph”, from chap. παραγράφω “ascribe”, then from παρά “near, near” + γράφω “write, draw, describe”

      I really immediately pop up other great-Russian-words
      Paraffin-O..i-screwed-goof-off-in-the-mud-face-wise-nama ... b-. etc. etc.

      The article is for PARAFFIN. fool sad
      1. JonnyT
        JonnyT 28 March 2013 14: 01 New
        0
        Thanks for the enlightenment. good
      2. Rustiger
        Rustiger 28 March 2013 15: 07 New
        +2
        Comes from the french. parapher "to wax; sign ”, further from paraphe“ stroke; sight "


        Thanks for clarifying. I did not have to go into the dictionaries.
        Why don't the editors of the site give a "translation" right away. Or did not find suitable words.
        Fucked them for this minas!
        Would hit the second for "news about nothing"
        1. dmitreach
          dmitreach 28 March 2013 15: 35 New
          +1
          Why would the editors of the site

          Sudars enlighten. We are on our internet. In order to get into the dictionary you do not even need to lift the sirloins from the chair. (Yes, I climbed the same dictionary)

          In this situation, another question interests me: Where Mr. Barn Obama is watching ??? Iraq seems to be their clearing ....
        2. dmitreach
          dmitreach 28 March 2013 15: 36 New
          0
          Why would the editors of the site

          Sudars enlighten. We are on our internet. In order to get into the dictionary you do not even need to lift the sirloins from the chair. (Yes, I climbed the same dictionary)

          In this situation, another question interests me: Where Mr. Barn Obama is watching ??? Iraq seems to be their clearing ....
  2. aksakal
    aksakal 28 March 2013 11: 04 New
    +9
    But what about amers? So what? They conquered Iraq for that, 5000 soldiers laid down, so that Iraq would take up its mission again? - began to buy the usual weapons in a new way, then again - again, politics independent of the States, and so on all over again?
    Okay, yesterday Bangladesh. Iraq is at least solvent. And he still has something to offer Russia - at least the same Lukoil concessions. And again - foreign exchange earnings, helicopter plants operating in full power in Kazan and Ufa ...
    If so, it's time to raise the salary of the designers so that young people think with brains - is it necessary to go into the legal or financial-economic? Maybe in technical? Of course, it’s difficult, drawings, sopromat, TMM, sleepless nights and missed intoxicated parties - ((((((. The work of the designer in Russia is greatly underestimated. It's time to fix it!
    1. Ustas
      Ustas 28 March 2013 12: 20 New
      +3
      Quote: aksakal
      The work of the designer in Russia is greatly underestimated. It's time to fix it!

      100500
      It is time for designers and engineers to pay the appropriate salary. Stop encouraging traders who do nothing to create a public product.
    2. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 28 March 2013 13: 35 New
      0
      I am surprised at Bangladesh’s GDP 305 billion dollars. And your solvent Iraq earns a year 94 billion dollars.
      1. Alexey Prikazchikov
        Alexey Prikazchikov 28 March 2013 17: 54 New
        +2
        Nda govp Ukarin below Bangladesh almost 2 times. And therefore, even Kazakhstan with a smaller population overtook the indicator.
      2. Alexey Prikazchikov
        Alexey Prikazchikov 28 March 2013 17: 55 New
        0
        Nda govp Ukarin below Bangladesh almost 2 times. And therefore, even Kazakhstan with a smaller population overtook the indicator.
  3. Nasty
    Nasty 28 March 2013 11: 05 New
    +9
    In the photo, the Arab looks like he is afraid that Putin wants to capture, and then throw through the hip ...
    or did he also think about what it means to “initiate”
    1. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 28 March 2013 15: 59 New
      +1
      And he says: - Mr. Putin, only not on the stock exchange.
    2. Rustiger
      Rustiger 28 March 2013 17: 34 New
      +2
      Attention.
      In the nomination "Word of the day" the site "Military Review" wins for neologism "PARAFFINE"
    3. Rustiger
      Rustiger 28 March 2013 17: 34 New
      0
      Attention.
      In the nomination "Word of the day" the site "Military Review" wins for neologism "PARAFFINE"
  4. elmi
    elmi 28 March 2013 11: 19 New
    +4
    I think that as soon as the Americans leave Iraq, military-technical cooperation will increase faster, as in the previous days of Saddam
  5. zao74
    zao74 28 March 2013 11: 25 New
    0
    Before the execution of the contract there are still many obstacles.
  6. Dmitry 2246
    Dmitry 2246 28 March 2013 11: 32 New
    +1
    Good tidings. Though with a fight, but forward!
    It's nice that others fought and profit to us.
  7. Wedmak
    Wedmak 28 March 2013 11: 35 New
    +6
    He initialed .... But it was impossible to write in Russian? What kind of fashion went, write foreign words in Russian letters ... That it was not clear?
    1. Bombowoz
      Bombowoz 28 March 2013 12: 28 New
      +1
      In-in! It’s necessary, but why distort the Russian language in such a way. - Only for initialed.
  8. AlNikolaich
    AlNikolaich 28 March 2013 12: 45 New
    0
    Yeah. I thought that the word "initialed" has a completely different meaning ....
    Wrong however! Next time, let them immediately translate the pancake ... negative
  9. Bargus
    Bargus 28 March 2013 13: 42 New
    +4
    I support the views of the previous opponent that the media and many politicians, and this began with Gorbachev, began to express their thoughts and speeches in foreign and foreign words in two ways, although Russian speech and thoughts of presentation are much richer and more understandable to a simple Russian citizen, the essence is either intentionally or just populism although the Russian language is clogged by this and loses its identity, its significance among the people.
  10. Veteran
    Veteran 28 March 2013 14: 39 New
    +6
    Initialization is the preliminary signing of an international agreement by the initials of the persons who participated in its development (initials are placed on each page of the agreed text of the draft agreement). This is an optional stage of concluding an international agreement, carried out at the request of the parties. The legal significance of initialing lies in the fact that it binds signatories with an obligation to consider negotiations in specific parts or in the text as a whole completed and deprives them of the opportunity to depart from already agreed language. However, initiation does not create a legally binding agreed text for states. The governments of these states may, at their discretion, having familiarized themselves with the draft initialed agreement (or its parts), make any changes or additions to it. By significance, a initialed agreement is close to an agreement signed “before the final decision”, which also does not bind the contracting states.
  11. urchik
    urchik 28 March 2013 15: 12 New
    +1
    Quote: Wedmak
    He initialed .... But it was impossible to write in Russian? What kind of fashion went, write foreign words in Russian letters ... That it was not clear?

    And how to understand the expression written above (+100500)? From some dibiltelechannel?
  12. bairat
    bairat 29 March 2013 08: 54 New
    0
    The main question is the terms of the transaction: are we giving back the technology again or for "real" money? To whom, to whom, and to Iraq so many debts were written off that our country could spend this year relaxing without refusing anything.
  13. bairat
    bairat 29 March 2013 08: 55 New
    0
    The main question is the terms of the transaction: are we giving back the technology again or for "real" money? To whom, to whom, and to Iraq so many debts were written off that our country could spend this year relaxing without refusing anything.
  14. bairat
    bairat 29 March 2013 08: 55 New
    0
    The main question is the terms of the transaction: are we giving back the technology again or for "real" money? To whom, to whom, and to Iraq so many debts were written off that our country could spend this year relaxing without refusing anything.
  15. Veteran
    Veteran 29 March 2013 16: 37 New
    +5
    Hussein's debt obligations are no longer legally legal (remember how the Soviet Republic abandoned the debts of Tsarist Russia), it would be futile to expect a refund, they will not return to us. But new contracts on a "live" commercial basis (payment after the fact) are very necessary - both for trading profit, and for future contracts (BT service), and for political influence.