Military Review

The bench tests of the modernized on-board equipment complex Tu-160 have been completed.

38
Tupolev OJSC together with FGUP GosNII AS, FGUP OKB Elektroavtomatika them. P.A. Efimova "and GLITS them. Chkalov completed bench tests of the upgraded on-board equipment complex of the first stage of the modernization of the strategic aviation strike complex Tu-160.


The bench tests of the modernized on-board equipment complex Tu-160 have been completed.


According to the press service of JSC Tupolev, the tests were carried out on a complex semi-natural stand, as a result of bench workings, a conclusion was obtained that flight tests were to be carried out in the 2013 year.

The upgraded aircraft will receive a number of new systems on modern elemental base, differing in advanced features and increased reliability.

Tupolev OJSC, together with FSUE GosNII AS and cooperative enterprises, are working on the creation of semi-natural simulation stands for working out the whole range of specific tasks of onboard equipment complexes of modernized and newly developed long-range aircraft aviationbased on Russian technologies and element base, corresponding to the concept of integrated modular avionics with open architecture.

Simulation of jamming and target environments, high-performance simulation computing systems, together with a full-scale cockpit and on-board equipment, make it possible to completely simulate long flights to perform combat missions. Similar solutions are used today to simulate the most critical stages of takeoff and landing of civilian and special aircraft.
Originator:
http://www.aex.ru/news/2013/3/26/104206/
38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. queen
    queen 27 March 2013 07: 54 New
    11
    It’s a pity that not everyone took away from Ukraine. They needed them as the fifth leg of the dog (((((and we won’t build yet. It’s sad. We must save what we have, we will wait for PAK YES.
    1. Skarte
      Skarte 27 March 2013 08: 34 New
      +4
      Ukraine lost money for the ostentatious destruction of what their brains have not grown to ... "It's not worth breaking" ... These beautiful birds have great potential, and a good filling will increase their efficiency many times ...
      1. queen
        queen 27 March 2013 08: 58 New
        +1
        Quote: Skarte
        big potential

        I don’t argue, but the production period is 10 maximum 15 years. Then there is still nothing.
        1. VAF
          VAF 27 March 2013 14: 18 New
          +1
          Quote: regin
          but the production period is 10 maximum 15 years


          No Volodya ... the appointed calendar will be extended, so 20-25 years more .. fly!
          1. queen
            queen 27 March 2013 14: 31 New
            +1
            Good Sergey. Renew from hopelessness. No new yet visible ((((
            1. VAF
              VAF 27 March 2013 14: 42 New
              +2
              Quote: regin
              Extend from hopelessness. New is not yet visible


              And what remains ... even so! And about the Kh-101/102 missiles somehow .. "they were silent," otherwise, last year, everyone was already "destroyed", including the AUG wassat
              1. queen
                queen 27 March 2013 14: 51 New
                +1
                Quote: vaf
                X-101/102 missiles

                So I look, they only tested on bears, but did the TU-160 drag them? Or is this just the modernization for them?
                1. VAF
                  VAF 27 March 2013 17: 17 New
                  +1
                  Quote: regin
                  and did the TU-160 drag them? Or is this just the modernization for them?


                  These missiles are just under the Tu-160 and under the Tu-95MS, just the Swan takes them 2 times more and flies with them twice as far, that's just .. Bears three times more!
              2. queen
                queen 27 March 2013 14: 56 New
                +1
                About X-101
                Flight speed: cruising 190 √ 200 m / s, maximum -250 - 270 m / s. Flight duration up to 10 hours
                I about 10 hours didn’t understand anything)))))))))
                1. VAF
                  VAF 27 March 2013 17: 34 New
                  +2
                  Quote: regin
                  Flight speed: cruising 190 √ 200 m / s, maximum -250 - 270 m / s.


                  Almost everything is normal here ... the speed range is from 690 to 950 km / h, the range is 5500 km, the maximum average flight duration is 7-8 hours, and about 10 hours ... test data for the maximum duration wink



                  And on the Tu-160, how do you look? Only on the ground or already in flight .. when released

                  1. queen
                    queen 27 March 2013 17: 43 New
                    +1
                    Quote: vaf
                    And on the Tu-160 as .. look

                    Cool, before that I only dopped later, picked on the internet, did not find it. drinks Amerikosy’s campaign is a little afraid of her))))
    2. silver_roman
      silver_roman 27 March 2013 12: 19 New
      0
      yes, but PAK YES will be fundamentally .... different. Firstly, it will not be supersonic, and secondly (as far as is known from the available information, the airframe will be designed according to the aerodynamic wing scheme, such as the K-B-2 for amers. I understand that under the PAK DA its armament complex will be developed, such as flying 4-5 thousand km, launched the X - *** rocket and flew back, hitting the target. Although the Tu-160 can also do this. In general, it’s a pity that there are few such vehicles as the Tu-160.
      1. Nayhas
        Nayhas 27 March 2013 22: 04 New
        -1
        The fact of the matter is that a 5th generation bomber is not required to deliver strategic cruise missiles. This is a waste of money. For example, in the United States, the B-1B is actually no longer a strategic bomber in the modern sense of the term. The main strategist is the old man B-52N, which can take on board 20 strategic missile launchers, while 74 operating aircraft can easily arrange nuclear hell in almost any country without entering the airspace. Against its background, the insanely expensive B-2 with only 16 CR looks dull. Here, of course, it is worthwhile to understand that the B-2 was created in the era of the Cold War against one specific country, which has long been gone and because of this it is not worth letting 20 cars under the knife, of course, but why repeat this frankly senseless path? Against this background, China's decision to build the N-6K looks more logical. The design worked out over the years, debugged by production, quite inexpensive D-30 engines have earned a good reputation. As a result, China has a cheap strategic bomber carrier of six CDs equipped with a powerful radar, a powerful electronic warfare station, and modern avionics. With an air-to-air refueling system, it can perform the same tasks as the B-52H and B-2.
        1. Skarte
          Skarte 28 March 2013 09: 55 New
          0
          Do not tell me, for these purposes, new technologies will be developed, a solution (from materials to software) and work for brains, there is a task, then minds are at work ... if it is not a full-fledged working project, then it can be called " machine "for from the point of new solutions that can be easily applied in other projects ... about the use ... maybe he will not be able to strike at America and replace" Poplar "(for example), but it will be quite good at solving problems to destroy their own bases in Europe ... he may have a very wide range of tasks.
          1. Nayhas
            Nayhas 28 March 2013 16: 45 New
            0
            Be realistic, our military-industrial complex has long outlived its usefulness, by the way, Yuri Borisov, Deputy Defense Minister for Armaments, said recently "about the decline in the quality of weapons and equipment supplied to the troops, as well as about the fact that the defense complex has practically exhausted its scientific and technical reserve."
            1. Skarte
              Skarte 29 March 2013 07: 55 New
              0
              Time will tell...
          2. Nayhas
            Nayhas 28 March 2013 16: 46 New
            0
            Be realistic, our military-industrial complex has long outlived its usefulness, by the way, Yuri Borisov, Deputy Defense Minister for Armaments, said recently "about the decline in the quality of weapons and equipment supplied to the troops, as well as about the fact that the defense complex has practically exhausted its scientific and technical reserve."
  2. Krasnoyarsk
    Krasnoyarsk 27 March 2013 08: 49 New
    -1
    Would complete the backlogs of the Tu-160.
    1. queen
      queen 27 March 2013 08: 56 New
      0
      Quote: Krasnoyarets
      Would complete the backlogs

      Won't, it's not a super-duper build.
    2. Wedmak
      Wedmak 27 March 2013 09: 45 New
      0
      There's no point. The development went PAK YES. Perhaps the backlogs will be dismantled for its prototype.
    3. White
      White 27 March 2013 10: 18 New
      +1
      There is no groundwork. All that has already been completed. But even that flies in doubt because there is a problem with the engines.
      1. PLO
        PLO 27 March 2013 11: 47 New
        0
        There is no groundwork

        exist
        either 2 or 3 gliders
        but as you yourself noticed a problem with the engines
        1. VAF
          VAF 27 March 2013 14: 08 New
          +1
          Quote: olp
          exist
          either 2 or 3 gliders


          Oleg NO, anger exists, neither 2. nor 3 nor 1.5, but only 0 integers .... hell tenths !!!
    4. VAF
      VAF 27 March 2013 14: 06 New
      +1
      Quote: Krasnoyarets
      Would complete the backlogs of the Tu-160.


      Again you are talking about some .. mythical backlog ???

      Last year, here on the site of a couple of KOLOUNS, such as SS-18 with foam at the mouth, it was proved that the Tu-160M ​​was flying at all times and the Kazan people saw the bulkheads between cargo bays for new super-duper-hyper missiles for days on end.

      And here the BAC and in the face .... it turns out they just completed bench tests of the future modernization program
      Although last year he talked about it and proved it. but most importantly fellow news and Chupa-Chups !!!
  3. Wedmak
    Wedmak 27 March 2013 08: 51 New
    0
    Only tests completed? belay And it was thought that they were already undergoing modernization ...
  4. elmi
    27 March 2013 09: 37 New
    +2
    The power of Russia is growing
  5. fzr1000
    fzr1000 27 March 2013 09: 43 New
    0
    And how many of them do we have now?
    1. Wedmak
      Wedmak 27 March 2013 09: 53 New
      +1
      16 pieces. True, not all are used. One seems to be for testing, the rest I do not remember. It seems that one has already gone or will go in the near future to modernization.
    2. ruton
      ruton 27 March 2013 11: 53 New
      +2
      At the beginning of 2013, the Russian Air Force included 16 Tu-160 aircraft hi
      1. bask
        bask 27 March 2013 13: 20 New
        +1
        Quote: ruton
        Russian Air Force at the beginning of 2013 there are 16 Tu-160 aircraft

        Little, catastrophically small !!!!!
        1. Wedmak
          Wedmak 27 March 2013 13: 25 New
          +1
          How much do you need?
          1. VAF
            VAF 27 March 2013 14: 12 New
            0
            Quote: Wedmak
            How much do you need?


            Pieces of 10-15 for each theater, and there are at least 5 of them, so count and combat-ready, and not ... payroll! soldier

            [img] http://aviaforum.ru/attachment.php?attachmentid=369126&d=1362652275 [/ img]
          2. VAF
            VAF 27 March 2013 14: 14 New
            +2
            Quote: Wedmak
            How much do you need?


            Pieces of 10-15 for each theater, and there are at least 5 of them, so count and combat-ready, and not ... payroll! soldier
            1. Odysseus
              Odysseus 27 March 2013 17: 32 New
              +1
              Quote: vaf
              Pieces of 10-15 for each theater, and there are at least 5 of them, so count and combat-ready, and not ... payroll!

              Eco You grabbed .... We would have to deal with the engines and get at least 16 combat ready would be happiness.
              1. VAF
                VAF 27 March 2013 18: 41 New
                +2
                Quote: Odyssey
                Eco You grabbed.


                Why grabbed? belay He answered a clearly posed question .... how much is needed ... gave an answer, based on realities, necessary .. just that! wink

                Quote: Odyssey
                We would have to deal with the engines and get at least 16 combat ready would be happiness.


                I have already been "christened" amerovsky praiser and commoner, do you want the same? wink
                For THEM, these fellow ... will not rust .. hang the label! +! drinks
                1. queen
                  queen 27 March 2013 18: 49 New
                  +1
                  Quote: vaf
                  I have already been "christened" amerovsky praiser and common man, do you want the same? wink
                  Behind THEM, these fellow ... will not rust .. hang the label! +! drinks

                  Here, too, are the Kremlin henchmen)))))
                2. Odysseus
                  Odysseus 27 March 2013 20: 58 New
                  +2
                  Quote: vaf
                  Why grabbed? He answered a clearly posed question .... how much is needed ... gave an answer, based on realities, necessary .. just that!

                  Ideally, of course, yes, but that's ideal ....
                  Quote: vaf
                  I have already been "christened" amerovsky praiser and commoner, do you want the same?

                  And me as a Chinese agent of influence. Moreover, in the topic where I suggested in the event of an attack by the PRC to inflict a massive nuclear missile strike on them smile
                  People can be understood. Life is difficult now. Good news is not enough. And some kind of outlet is needed. Hence all these "heroic" cries.
            2. Wedmak
              Wedmak 27 March 2013 21: 12 New
              0
              The whole fleet. At least a hundred, someone under repair, someone undergoing modernization, someone flying ... And how many refuellers you need ... bah ... I wonder what series PAK YES will go, God forbid, live to see the series ....
              1. sergius60
                sergius60 27 March 2013 23: 44 New
                0
                16 * 20 = 320 nuclear bullets. The radius of the GUARANTEED extermination of all living things, well, let's say 10 km. Along the front - 20 km. 320 * 20 = 6400 km of the coast of any country turn into a "death zone". I emphasize, it is the COAST. Because what remains inside, no one will need it. And you - "not enough" crying
  6. cosmos111
    cosmos111 27 March 2013 11: 50 New
    0
    TU-160 is the only strategic modern one. Update on-board electronics and a boot to serve 40 for at least another few years.
    1. queen
      queen 27 March 2013 12: 02 New
      +2
      40 years minimum? Well, you have gone too far ... 10-15 years. We have only two young .... the resource is not eternal.
  7. Gladius
    Gladius 27 March 2013 12: 18 New
    +1
    Beautiful plane - the white swan of the world!
  8. slavik_gross
    slavik_gross 27 March 2013 12: 20 New
    +1
    God help you. Straight heart rejoices !!!
  9. gavko
    gavko 27 March 2013 20: 41 New
    +1
    It is the largest supersonic aircraft in the history of military aviation and an aircraft with variable wing geometry, as well as the heaviest military aircraft in the world, which has the highest maximum take-off mass among bombers. Among the pilots received the nickname "White Swan"