Footage of powerful strikes by the Russian Aerospace Forces on Ukrainian positions in the Donetsk direction is shown

27
Footage of powerful strikes by the Russian Aerospace Forces on Ukrainian positions in the Donetsk direction is shown

The Russian army continues its offensive, liberating more and more territories of Donbass. Almost every day we receive reports about the advance of our troops and the capture of settlements in the Donetsk direction.

At the same time, the enemy often leaves positions without permission, contrary to orders, including on the so-called second lines of defense. The enemy's escape is facilitated by the massive fire impact of the Russian aviation and artillery. Taking into account the serious weakening of the air defense of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, our attack aircraft are now operating directly over Ukrainian positions, which increases the accuracy and destructive power of the strikes.



The network shows several shots of massive missile and bomb attacks by the Russian Aerospace Forces on the positions of Ukrainian militants in the Donetsk direction. Apparently, at first, army aviation worked along the identified defensive line of the Armed Forces of Ukraine near the forest belt, and so densely and on a large scale that the fire impact could well be called a carpet. Then bomb attacks were carried out on the more fortified supports, most likely using FAB with UMPC. Obviously, after such attacks, only the name remained of the enemy’s positions.







According to the latest data as of this morning, to the west of Marinka, Russian assault groups are advancing in Georgievka along the main street, have gained a foothold in a school and continue to push through enemy defenses. To the west of Novomikhailovka, our attack aircraft entered the eastern part of Paraskovievka and have already taken control of up to a third of the village.

In Krasnogorovka, the cleansing of the refractory plant, which was the enemy’s most powerful fortified area, continues. If our people leave the plant to clear the low-rise northern part of the city, then the Ukrainian militants holed up in the high-rise buildings in the eastern part risk ending up in a cauldron. Judging by the latest reports about the entry of our troops into the northern buildings, this plan is already being implemented, and from the opposite flank.



From the Artemovsky Front special News No. On the flanks there are oncoming battles in the area of ​​​​Bogdanovka and Kleshcheevka and to the west of Krasnoye (Ivanovsky). Aviation and artillery are actively working, hitting Ukrainian Armed Forces positions in Chasov Yar and Ukrainian Armed Forces supply facilities in Konstantinovka. Apparently, the Kiev command decided to set up another symbolic “fortification” from Chasy Yar and is constantly sending reinforcements to the Russian FAB and artillery. At the same time, FPVs remain a serious problem in this area.drones the adversary.

Regarding the situation in the area liberated by the Russian Armed Forces Ocheretino in the Avdeevsky direction, today wrote "Military Review."

27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    April 27 2024 10: 55
    Well, they write that our bombs with correction modules fly 120 kilometers deep into enemy territory, that is, aviation operates in a relatively calm environment! And, the massive use of such bombs allows our military to clear territories of infiltrators as efficiently as possible.
    1. +1
      April 27 2024 10: 59
      They write that it depends on the height of the discharge. They write that they fly up to a maximum of 100 km.
      They write that there is an experimental version with a pulsating engine - this type can reach up to 150.
      1. +1
        April 27 2024 11: 01
        The correction module has been modified, and not only that, and such bombs now fly 120 kilometers deep into the territory from the release point.
        1. 0
          April 27 2024 11: 29
          Now, if only they could drop such bombs without planes to a height of 15 km, or even 7-10 km. it would be even better. What I mean is that a 600mm MLRS is very necessary. At least a couple of prototypes.
          1. 0
            April 27 2024 11: 52
            Do you want one, Luna-M?
            1. 0
              April 27 2024 12: 11
              no wink
              something like this. and yes my comment is too short
              1. 0
                April 28 2024 17: 04
                We could use the North Korean KN-25.
  2. +1
    April 27 2024 10: 58
    For advertising purposes, they could also show the place where the KAB 500 was unloaded, after the detonation of the cassettes. Otherwise, nothing can be seen in the smoke. recourse
    1. 0
      April 27 2024 11: 08
      The SVO seems to be serious, and not for show - that’s what the authorities say.
      1. 0
        April 27 2024 11: 29
        KAB 500 has good export potential.
  3. +1
    April 27 2024 11: 03
    Along the identified defensive line of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, near the forest belt, army aviation worked, and so densely and on a large scale that the fire impact could well be called a carpet
    Indeed, from the first frames you can see what has gone down like a carpet. Very similar to the use of cassette b/p (the nature of alternating breaks). That's their way and that's the only way.
    1. 0
      April 27 2024 11: 31
      However, the explosion of a high-explosive munition did not occur in a forest belt. And the effectiveness of large high-explosive bombs in an open field is questionable. If they are used, it will be with an explosion in the air at a height of 5-10 meters from the surface.
  4. Hey
    +2
    April 27 2024 11: 27
    To be honest, I'm skeptical about videos like this. The picture itself is spectacular. But the result of the strike is in doubt. First, we do not know where the enemy positions were. Before the forest planting, behind it, or usually in the planting itself. Based on the latter, the consequences for the enemy are minimal. If wrong, refute it.
    1. +1
      April 27 2024 11: 45
      Here the truth is covered in a dense “fog of war”. No one can confirm or refute it. The hope remains that they knew where they were hitting. But one thing I can say for sure, in the understanding of a resident of, for example, the Non-Black Earth region, I would not call these thorny bushes forest plantations, a 100-kilometer march in 87, they splashed there and as a shelter, what was in them, what was in front of them, what was behind them was about equally useless, well, unless you burrowed very, very deep and covered it with concrete or covered it with slabs.
    2. +2
      April 27 2024 12: 17
      Quote: MUD
      We don’t know where the enemy positions were... If I’m wrong, refute it

      That's right - we don't know. There is nothing to refute or confirm.
    3. 0
      April 27 2024 12: 46
      It looks like they really missed the mark a little with both the cassette and high-explosive ones.
    4. 0
      April 28 2024 17: 01
      To be honest, I'm skeptical

      Sit in the trench and sit five meters from this...
      They will write out diapers for the rest...
    5. 0
      1 May 2024 17: 26
      In 2022, in Kherson, somewhere in the forest, our defense forces were fired at with shells containing shrapnel. I remember these shots - every tree has a corpse
  5. +2
    April 27 2024 11: 52
    It’s a little unclear why they covered the field, and not the planting or construction, were the HHHs really dug in in an open field?
    Somehow it doesn’t fit with logic, but maybe now there are some new views on the equipment of positions
    1. 0
      April 27 2024 13: 28
      Quote: Romanenko
      It’s a little unclear why they covered the field, and not the planting or construction, were the HHHs really dug in in an open field?

      How to equip positions in the forest belt itself? Are you going to break a road right through the “forest” with a tank? Positions are set up in close proximity to the strip, maximum at the “edge”. Don't forget, if you can't be seen through the trees, then you can't see anyone...
      1. 0
        April 27 2024 14: 47
        Well, new times mean a new vision of the issue; of course, it is much more difficult to make positions in a forest belt, but it is also an order of magnitude more reliable. At least some kind of camouflage, some kind of protection from the flight of drones and flying fragments, but in a field, or at the edge of the forest, it’s clear. As for what is visible or not visible, for this purpose the branches are removed here and there in the firing sectors and you can see it, but not so much you.
        Of course, I served in the army a long time ago, so I repeat, maybe something has changed conceptually...
  6. -1
    April 27 2024 12: 06
    It lay well, heaped. But unfortunately, as often happens, the accuracy failed. The FAB is in the field, the first cassettes landed right in the forest belt, but the rest are back in the field. Let's hope that the destructive elements reached the forest belt.
    Apparently the drop was from an airplane: the FAB and the first cassettes lay strictly along the same vector, the next cassettes went to the right, but in the same square.
    If the arrival had been 30-40 meters closer, then there would have been nothing left of the forest belt at all.
    1. -4
      April 27 2024 12: 18
      Quote: Alex100
      If the arrival had been 30-40 meters closer, then there would have been nothing left of the forest belt at all

      Hmm, are we at war with the forest belts?
      1. 0
        April 28 2024 17: 07
        With those who hide in them.
        1. 0
          April 28 2024 18: 17
          Quote: Sergei N 58912062
          With those who hide in them

          Or not in them...
          1. 0
            April 28 2024 18: 19
            You can't really hide in an open field. Unlike the forest belt.
            1. 0
              April 28 2024 18: 20
              Quote: Sergei N 58912062
              Unlike the forest belt

              You can’t really dig trenches in the forest belt. Unlike an open field.