“Ukraine may cease to exist”: Lukashenko announced the need for peaceful negotiations on the Ukrainian conflict

Currently, the armed conflict in Ukraine threatens the very existence of this state. This statement was made by the President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko.

As the head of the Belarusian state noted, the Ukrainian military personnel themselves were tired of the fighting. Nobody wants to fight, so we need to move towards peaceful negotiations, Lukashenko believes.

If we don’t negotiate now, Ukraine may lose its statehood and cease to exist

- said the President of Belarus.

At the same time, Lukashenko drew attention to NATO's aggressive and militaristic actions in Eastern Europe. According to the Belarusian leader, Washington is developing aggressive rhetoric towards Moscow and Minsk. Lukashenko considered the allocation of new US military assistance to Ukraine an important step towards escalating the conflict.

Separately, the head of the Belarusian state focused on the militarization of Poland and the Baltic countries. According to him, NATO and the United States are turning them into a springboard for further aggressive actions against the Russian Federation and Belarus. Thus, military infrastructure is being built at an accelerated pace in Poland and the Baltic republics, including naval and aviation bases for the forces and means of the North Atlantic Alliance.

To date, the modernization of five airfields, two naval bases, and six large training grounds has been completed in Poland and the Baltic countries

- stressed Lukashenko.

The President of Belarus also named the main opponents of the United States. According to Alexander Lukashenko, contrary to popular belief, these include not only China and Russia. The European Union is also considered by the US authorities as a rival and competitor, so they are interested in weakening the “united Europe”.

Comments

[Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov]

“Ukraine may lose its statehood and cease to exist” -

- Well, okay...

[military97]

There would be someone to negotiate with... And the price of their “word” is a pittance...

[fruc]

Previously, Ukraine was at least a spacer between the West and the East, but now we do not need it in its current role (ram). It turns out there are Ukrainians, but no Ukraine.

[kvv]

why bother them, let him stop, this is the best option

[rs777]

It seems as if Lukashenko wants to save the second-hand Nazi regime.

[alystan]

This NENKA sits deeply in him too.

[guest]

Quote: kvv

this is the best option

I agree, and another obscene world will bring us a lot of blood in the future, most likely not so distant.

[Reptiloid]

why bother them, let him stop, -----kvv

I don’t understand, as if Old Man is afraid that it will collapse or what? Incapable of contract!!! Is he really talking about new Minskys??? A long time ago, Wasserman assumed that Ukraine should be annexed to Russia, piecemeal. Now we see that this is happening.

[isv000]

“Ukraine may cease to exist”

You usually can’t get information out of Old Man, which means the decision has been made. May God grant that the good decision is not reversed!..

[Wolfskin1993]

Not “can”, but “MUST” disappear!!!

[Mouse]

. Ukraine may lose its statehood and cease to exist

Yes, it would be quick...
Talk about negotiations will stop immediately...

[sdivt]

If we don’t negotiate now, Ukraine may lose its statehood and cease to exist, the President of Belarus said

This is not the first time the topic of negotiations has been discussed, which in itself is annoying
And this strange formulation is even more annoying - if we don’t start negotiations, Ukraine will disappear
I do not understand something?
Lukashenko would like to preserve Ukraine - so that Russia does not get bored in the future? Did you live in constant tone?

[guest]

Quote from sdivt

Lukashenko would like to save Ukraine

Well, he has Ukrainian roots with that last name.

[spirit]

Lukashenko would like to preserve Ukraine - so that Russia does not get bored in the future? Did you live in constant tone?

Do you think Lukashenko himself, on his own initiative, will raise such topics?)) As in the situation with Prigozhin, a person voices through himself the desire of you know who. The Old Man here acts as a repeater.

[Reptiloid]

Somehow it looks a lot like blackmail. But it makes sense for him to push the Russian Federation towards peace Why. What is his interest? Or who asked? Or some kind of pressure Unclear

[NOT malicious]

Everything turns out interesting... Father didn’t say anything new. Almost...
What if we look at the situation through the prism of official proclamations from all sides?
The picture looks like this:
The “West” is against multipolarity, but for the presence of hygiene. For the presence of a specific “bug” who is puppeteering everyone, “such a bastard”!!!!! As a result, the Gugemon unites many countries against a specific state and directs them in the right direction. Well, the same? Mulka does everything at her own expense.
“Vostok” stands for multipolarity, for equality, for the absence of a specific and clearly visible owner-leader-holder of the “common fund, public interests” and so on. As a result, no one can become a unifying factor, a core, a nifrite rod (whatever) so that everyone together in a united format can resist the hellish enemies. No, how could it be otherwise?!?!?! Multipolarity, equal rights!!!!!! Someone cannot be “more equal” than the others and dominate, command, and understand!....
As a result, the bottom line is that the “multipolar equals” defend each one for himself against the “unipolar ones led by the hygiemon.”
Everyone acts within the framework of their ideas.
What is the result?
And such is that even Belarus cannot be used as a clear and distinct ally in the war. Because Father is also for multipolarity, “sitting on 5 chairs.” Or have you forgotten his somersaults?
And he pokes and remembers everything. One story with his presentation regarding the coup in Minsk by the forces of the “Wagnerites” is worth something! And not only this...

[sdivt]

Quote: NOT malicious

Vostok stands for multipolarity

East is a loose concept)
Which East are you talking about? I think we're talking only about Russia
Because if you listen carefully to Mr. Xi, then there is no talk of any multipolarity.
Mr. Xi sees a strictly bipolar world, China - USA.
There is no Russia in his paradigm. And if there is, then strictly in the wake of China
Give at least one quote from China about a multipolar future?

[Eug]

Agree? So that Ukraine can survive as a state? With whom to negotiate? Is he himself in favor of preserving Ukraine as a state? Or does he only give advice to be good to everyone?

[rotmistr60]

If we don’t negotiate now, Ukraine may lose its statehood and cease to exist

Is Lukashenko very concerned about Ukraine in its current state, led by the Bandera regime? We've already had our fill of Minsk. Fortunately, Lavrov officially stated that if there are negotiations, it will not be with Zelensky and the Russian army will not stop hostilities during this time.

[Volunteer Marek]

So this is the goal - the destruction of the fascist state in Ukraine! What's wrong?

[esl462]

Well, let's drink to that without clinking glasses.

[Boris Sergeev]

What is the meaning of these exhortations? Lukashenko has been harping on the same thing for years, but Ukraine remains intact and even the front line does not move. Not a single blow has been dealt to the leadership of Ukraine; “partners” are calmly coming to Kyiv. Putin invites them to return to the “Istanbul agreements,” according to which even Crimea is, in fact, recognized as Ukraine. Why should they worry about their statehood then? Further, Ukrainian—more precisely, Bandera—statehood is preserved, so what? The West will pump them up with weapons, new generations will be raised not just on legends about Bandera, but by presenting the SVO as “the typical aggressiveness of Muscovites.” The United States will place military bases on the same border with Belarus. And when they find the moment, they will strike with all guns.

[ivan2022]

"Ukraine" in the sense of a state. If he stops, there will be a terrible fight and a war between everyone and everyone. In a country with a whole bunch of nuclear power plants and a lot of real crazy people, it’s not the best.
Politicians should have thought about these things earlier, and not about implementing the stupid Minsk agreements. To which Old Man had a hand, and now stands on the sidelines, reasoning and being clever; “look at the hands - here they are, clean!”

[Ghost1]

The West has allocated money for weapons, so they are not considering negotiations this year.

[opposite28]

If we don’t negotiate now, Ukraine may lose its statehood and cease to exist, the President of Belarus said.

I hope the message in Kyiv was heard. There will be no agreements...

[NOT malicious]

Quote: Eug

Agree? So that Ukraine can survive as a state? With whom to negotiate? Is he himself in favor of preserving Ukraine as a state? Or does he only give advice to be good to everyone?

Don’t be surprised, but - THEY AGREED, AGREED and WILL AGREE! Don't believe me?
"Who should we negotiate with?" - with the head of Ukraine on gas transit contracts, for example. For 2024 and beyond, for 2025. If you don’t believe me, see the official media. Within the framework of such contracts, Ukraine is a state.
Trade with “vna” and war with “vna” are taking their own, but simultaneous, course. Don't confuse flies and cutlets!

[sergant036]

Luka, as usual, demonstrates his “remarkable” farm intelligence. What kind of negotiations, what kind of zug-zwang? Dad, are you crazy or just a traitor? Most likely - the second. You, your blessed west, will be strung up on a lantern first, you weirdo with the letter “m”.

[Oldman]

You, with your sergeant's intellect, cannot understand the farm life, alas...

[know]

Lukashenko, of course, does not say this on his own initiative - he is probably transmitting “signals” from Putin about readiness for negotiations.

[FoBoss_VM]

It’s not that Ukraine can cease to exist. She MUST cease to exist.

[dweira63]

In fact, I am not surprised by this president’s call to move towards peace negotiations; “the Ukrainian military is tired of fighting” is a strange statement. The question is, why is this now, when our troops are going on the offensive? Whose position did he decide to voice? - that’s the main question, it doesn’t look like a gag. I don’t think he is concerned about preserving Ukraine as a sovereign state.

[NOT malicious]

Quote from sdivt

Quote: NOT malicious

Vostok stands for multipolarity

East is a loose concept)
Which East are you talking about? I think we're talking only about Russia
Because if you listen carefully to Mr. Xi, then there is no talk of any multipolarity.
Mr. Xi sees a strictly bipolar world, China - USA.
There is no Russia in his paradigm. And if there is, then strictly in the wake of China
Give at least one quote from China about a multipolar future?

"...If you listen carefully to Mr. Xi, then we are not talking about any multipolarity" - For those who listen, are NOT attentive and do not know how to use Tynet and look at a PC (a laptop; a thing like that, with a drawer, a screen and a bunch of buttons) with a little less respect than for a Typewriter, please:
"BEIJING, August 22 - RIA Novosti. China will continue to strengthen the strategic partnership within the BRICS framework, promote the democratization of international relations and multipolarity of the world, said Chinese President Xi Jinping in his address to the participants of the BRICS business forum, which was read out by Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao on Tuesday."

Is it normal, or is it okay for you to google it?

[sdivt]

Quote: NOT malicious

For those who listen, are NOT attentive and do not know how to use Tyrnet and are looking at a PC (camputer; something like that, with a box, a screen and a bunch of buttons)

Thank you, I had fun)
Now, let's get back to the topic.
What did I ask? Quote? Or interpretation performed by the media?
Quote. And you gave me how this is understood in our media.
Would you also refer to your own comment?
Do you understand the difference?
But what am I talking about) Judging by the vocabulary (camputer, knonpachegi) - there are some doubts
Here is the definition of a quote according to Ozhegov:
A quotation is an exact, verbatim excerpt from some text or statement.
Unfortunately, I don’t know your vocabulary, I explained about these tyrnets and knonpachegs in the simplest possible terms, I hope you understand me

[NOT malicious]

Quote: Dweira63

In fact, I am not surprised by this president’s call to move towards peace negotiations; “the Ukrainian military is tired of fighting” is a strange statement. The question is, why is this now, when our troops are going on the offensive? Whose position did he decide to voice? - that’s the main question, it doesn’t look like a gag. I don’t think he is concerned about preserving Ukraine as a sovereign state.

“...why do this now, when our troops are going on the offensive” - well, probably, then why negotiations were held in Tehran and Yalta (google the years yourself). Then, too, “our troops went on the offensive.”

[Ivan Ivanov]

The Ukrainian military personnel themselves were tired of the fighting. Nobody wants to fight, so we need to move towards peaceful negotiations, Lukashenko believes.

This is where he is wrong. The population of fascist Ukraine, a significant part of it, is warmed by a sense of national superiority and support of the white master. Otherwise, no one would have fought for a long time.
Who is he addressing, what kind of negotiations. Doesn’t he see that they are going to fight with us?

[Appraiser]

Who needs Ukraine anyway? The question is of course rhetorical. After all, there was no such state before, therefore it should not be written into history as a state. A state is a political form of organization of society in a certain territory, a sovereign form of public power, possessing an apparatus of control and coercion to which the entire population of the country is subordinate. Simply put, it is a failed project of “independence”, controlled from the outside. At the same time, the people (the population of the country) do not obey the authorities.

[NOT malicious]

Quote: Oldman

Buddy, you need to disguise yourself, otherwise it’s clear that you’re just enjoying the truth of the womb, you’re simply bursting with the realization of the power of your unsurpassed intellect. Let's smash Belarus for multipolarity, you can't use it as an ally...
Guys, there are so many idiots like this on the site, they’re just typical sissies.

Thank you! It is what it is. But there is no way to cut the truth, because I don’t have true information. I only have access to official media, including TV. Including Father’s speeches about the “Vangerites” with attacks on the Kremlin, for example. Remember? Or did you have a desire to suddenly forget everything and rewrite history, because this is something else? What about the supply of fuel and lubricants from Belarus to VNA? Forget too? And what about the Minsk gatherings under the roof of Belarus? Also - photo?
You must understand: if and when normal and even men rub in honesty and fists, there are no intermediaries. And if the Belarusian Father is so correct and principled for the Russian truth, we are welcome to unite across borders and legally with the Russian Federation and “Alga Kamsamol” from the north “out” to Kyiv. At that moment the war would end.
How can I be a chick if the current drew the attention of citizens "outside" to the fact that... and the boys are fighting, theirs on the "banking" successfully trade with Moscow? Where's the logic?
Why are you swearing? This is all multi-polarity, dude! Nothing personal, just lots and lots of polarity. Welcome!

[Oleg Apushkin]

Oh, this retro-slator prediction would sooner come true, why support V.I.’s mistakes? Lenin

[sdivt]

Quote: Oldman

Buddy, you need to disguise yourself... this is a typical sissy guy.

Bravo!
I don’t like your words, that means you’re a sissy
Standard practice, when there is nothing to object with - glue the label

Quote: Oldman

Let's smash Belarus for multipolarity

Sir, what does Belarus have to do with it? Are we talking about Lukashenko, or is it the same thing for you?
I have no complaints about Belarus, I go there at least once or twice a year, everything is great
And by the way, about multipolarity/multi-vector. Today, the number of vectors and other polarities for Lukashenko has sharply decreased. And do you know from when? From 2020, from August. It was then that Mr. Lukashenko began to understand that Russia is much closer than this entire united West

[Vasily12]

Surrender - there should be no other way. The state of Ukraine should not exist and this is the best outcome of the SVO.

[nordscout]

A.G. Lukashenko announced the need for peaceful negotiations on the Ukrainian conflict... Peace negotiations, for Russia and Belarus, are potentially a “one-way ticket”, since this is an attempt by the West + the USA to “preserve”, at Russia’s side, the state - an “infection” that our grandchildren will have to fight with, and with a very dubious result for the Union State... “Old Man” is getting old and begins to lose his international analytical “sense”... Times now are dashing, unpredictable, requiring clarity and decisiveness, especially in geopolitical matters... And the “laurels” of the Minsk peacemaker are probably already an exhibit for a museum...

[NOT malicious]

Quote from sdivt

which was read out by Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao on Tuesday.

"...which I read on Tuesday Chinese Minister of Commerce Wang Wentao."
- this is the quote, the text of the message from Xi and signed by him, which was read out by his minister. Do you need text in Chinese? I'm not giving it. I'm lazy.

How the press/protocol services of top officials work - Google to help!