Explosion in Odessa: The Russian Armed Forces are trying to knock out the infrastructure through which weapons and ammunition can be delivered to the Armed Forces of Ukraine

31
Explosion in Odessa: The Russian Armed Forces are trying to knock out the infrastructure through which weapons and ammunition can be delivered to the Armed Forces of Ukraine

A powerful explosion was reported in Odessa. At the same time, the Ukrainian side has not yet specifically reported on the arrival.

After the explosion, a fire broke out, which several crews of the State Emergency Service are trying to extinguish. According to the latest data, the explosion occurred at the port infrastructure.



It is reported from the scene that electricity has gone out in part of Odessa.

Earlier, attacks were carried out on the port infrastructure of Nikolaev.

All these options for fire impact fit into a single outline of the elimination of enemy infrastructure capable of receiving military cargo by sea. This is extremely important in view of the fact that the West is once again preparing large supplies of military equipment and ammunition to the Kyiv regime as part of an extensive military aid package worth almost $61 billion approved by the US Congress.

For obvious reasons, if supply channels weapons will not be blocked on the battlefield, this will cause significant problems and prolong the conflict, leading to new casualties. Therefore, isolating the front from supplying Ukrainian troops is a priority task of the Russian Armed Forces. And disabling the enemy’s port infrastructure is part of this task, and an extremely important one at that.
31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    April 24 2024 08: 02
    “All these options for fire impact fit into a single outline of the elimination of enemy infrastructure capable of receiving military cargo by sea” -

    — Odessa and Nikolaev should stop being port cities...
    (Before release)
    1. +12
      April 24 2024 08: 05
      In general, access to the sea is contraindicated for Ukrainians. Only for pig farms! It’s more convenient for them, and it’s calmer for us.
      1. +2
        April 24 2024 08: 16
        In the territories of Poland and Canada, just don’t confuse the Khkhlovs with the Ukrainians, the former are ideological, and the latter are forcibly converted by the Khkhlovs.
        1. +1
          April 24 2024 15: 22
          just don’t confuse the Khkhlovs with the Ukrainians

          Do you know how they differ from each other: Ukrainians live in Ukraine, and Ukrainians live where it’s better.
      2. +11
        April 24 2024 08: 17
        Another thing would be to send a couple of ships with cargo to the bottom, purely “by chance”, so that others would think about whether to approach the city.
        1. +1
          April 24 2024 08: 39
          That's what we're talking about. If you are afraid openly, do it on behalf of unknown well-wishers.
      3. +4
        April 24 2024 08: 40
        The port in Odessa must be smashed to smithereens so that no Kostya can bring back scows full of feces.
      4. +1
        April 24 2024 08: 40
        The port in Odessa must be smashed to smithereens so that no Kostya can bring back scows full of feces.
        1. 0
          April 24 2024 15: 24
          Shattering is possible, but only tactical nuclear weapons. There is no other option.
    2. +1
      April 24 2024 13: 34
      Quote: Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov
      — Odessa and Nikolaev should stop being port cities...

      For Ukraine....
  2. +7
    April 24 2024 08: 13
    They say - in the port... loud, such a BOOM! first 2 (within 2 seconds) after 2 minutes 2 more...
    Probably “they practiced teamwork in pairs” (c)
  3. +5
    April 24 2024 08: 18
    "Explosion in Odessa: Russian Armed Forces tries knock out the infrastructure through which weapons and ammunition can be delivered to the Ukrainian Armed Forces"
    I understand there are spelling errors in the article, but I think this is unacceptable in the title of the article. It’s just that after this I don’t even want to read further.
    1. +1
      April 24 2024 11: 55
      Quote: Kolt27
      in the title of the article I think this is unacceptable

      Apparently, the editors couldn’t decide: the army is oldеor the armed forces are oldюthsy.
  4. +1
    April 24 2024 08: 18
    Explosion in Odessa: The Russian Armed Forces are trying to knock out the infrastructure through which weapons and ammunition can be delivered to the Armed Forces of Ukraine
    . Logical, justified, NECESSARY!
    So let's go!
  5. +4
    April 24 2024 08: 20
    Determine which and whose ships will deliver weapons and declare them a legitimate target...
  6. +2
    April 24 2024 08: 24
    fit into a single outline of the elimination of enemy infrastructure capable of receiving military cargo by sea
    Another would be to try to break the overland supply chain, which is of course difficult (there are many routes), but at least partially.
  7. -1
    April 24 2024 08: 38
    There should be dozens of strikes on bridges, towers, generation, and transport interchanges. It is necessary to shoot down everything flying over the World Cup for the purpose of reconnaissance, then there is a chance to significantly reduce assistance. One-time pokes will not bring much benefit. We already took place last year.
    1. +1
      April 24 2024 09: 56
      i have been saying this from the start,
      but just seem to attract alot of minuses [ - ] on here.
      1. -2
        April 24 2024 10: 01
        Yes, many have been talking about this from the very beginning (March 22). People just want to believe in the Kremlin chess player who plays for a super long time, hence the disadvantages.
        1. -1
          April 24 2024 11: 59
          Quote: IvanIvanov
          they talked about this from the very beginning (March 22). People just want to believe

          People just want to believe that there are simple, easy and quick ways to win. Like, all the bridges were bombed and the enemy immediately got their paws up. Or they bombed Bankovskaya, or television towers, or all communication centers, all railway nodes and substations, all airfields, ports, administrative buildings, plants, factories, power plants, 750 kW substations, refineries, warehouses, air defense, airplanes, tanks, artillery and everything the rest, which should have been destroyed long ago, is as simple as that. It’s strange that the General Staff doesn’t understand this.
  8. +3
    April 24 2024 08: 42
    It is not necessary to destroy ports, but to destroy foreign ships with weapons right in these ports. This is a legitimate goal. They warned you... Or boyazzo?? Then the terpilas.
    1. -5
      April 24 2024 08: 46
      In general, yes, the Kremlin resolves its fears and skewed beliefs at the expense of the citizens, the citizens tolerate all this.
    2. +1
      April 24 2024 09: 57
      just like the ukelele,s did with the RU ships in port.
    3. -2
      April 24 2024 12: 15
      Quote: kiborg
      destroy foreign ships with weapons right in these ports

      Great idea. How do you determine which ships are armed and which are with tractors or Chinese clothes? A foreign ship was sunk, and it was carrying diapers and baby food. Not only will the entire world press start screaming that we are child killers and violators of maritime law, but the weapons will not be harmed, because they were unloaded at the river port of Romania and transported to Ukraine by truck. And then, somewhere on the way to Cape Town or Rio de Janeiro, our ships will begin to sink, especially the tankers of the shadow fleet - and what a fair response to Russian lawlessness.
  9. +1
    April 24 2024 09: 39
    Odessa : 3 passes d'entrées et un quai 'containers'...Je me rappelle qu'après la guerre des 6 jours le canal de Suez est resté bloqué des années à cause des navires coulés...
    1. +1
      April 24 2024 10: 00
      a ensuite été bloqué pendant des années, tout comme le pont aux États-Unis, qui a bloqué tous les navires entrant et sortant

      and was blocked for years afterwards, same too with the bridge in the US now, blocked all ships coming and going
  10. +3
    April 24 2024 12: 31
    "The Russian Armed Forces are trying to knock out the infrastructure through which weapons and ammunition can be delivered to the Armed Forces of Ukraine" So this is where the NWO should have started, there is no need to be shy, the Western “partners” will condemn it anyway.... soldier
  11. +2
    April 24 2024 14: 52
    Strikes on Odessa do not greatly affect the flow of Western weapons. Only the threat of a global nuclear war can stop supplies. To indicate this threat, you will have to apply warning a nuclear strike on Poland and/or Romania (the airbase in Rzeszow is best). The West no longer accepts other methods of communication.
  12. 0
    April 24 2024 21: 37
    Alla buon'ora: è da quasi un anno che Noi supporter diciamo ch'era di primaria importanza eseguire il blocco dei confini delle vie di arrivo e rifornimento degli aiuti e militari diretti all'Ukraina. Comunque sia sembra che altri scali come la base aerea di Dzhankoy sia ultimamente interessata dai rifornimenti Yankee, soprattutto per i missili Atakam.
  13. +1
    April 25 2024 01: 59
    The Jawor range is located near the border through which weapons are transported from Rzeszow, Poland. If you hit Yavor with a nuclear charge, it will not only mix up the rails with asphalt on Ukrainian territory, but will also reach Poland. On the one hand, this will help Europeans get rid of the illusion of impunity. On the other hand, it will not be considered an attack on NATO.
  14. kig
    +1
    April 25 2024 03: 51
    Two years have already passed, and the ports are still working. Why? It’s not that simple; you won’t achieve anything with periodic raids. All berths cannot be destroyed at all, and if they exist, then they can be unloaded by ship means.