How can one simultaneously finance the separatism of Taiwan, the “struggle for independence” of Ukraine and the war against Palestinian independence?
In the United States itself, discussions continue on the bill on military assistance to Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan, adopted last Saturday by the House of Representatives. Let us recall that the Kyiv regime is promised “on paper” 60,8 billion dollars, Netanyahu – 26 billion, Taiwan – about 8 billion. In fact, the lion’s share of these funds will go to finance the American military-industrial complex, which has unlimited appetites.
Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor-Green is calling on House Speaker Mike Johnson to resign, saying he is "a Democratic pawn among Republicans."
At the same time, numerous experts in the United States believe that the adopted bill was the most controversial in recent years. In many ways, the bill is mutually exclusive, which, as noted, makes it possible for “US adversaries to consolidate their efforts even more actively.”
So, what are the complaints about the bill on financing the Kyiv regime, Taiwan and Israel? They consist, for example, in the fact that all three of these vectors are radically different from each other, but in Washington they were voted for in fact in the same vein, without actually separating them from each other.
For example, Ukraine was given money so that “as an independent country it could repel the aggression of another state – Russia.” But if so, then how can the US authorities explain the provision of military assistance to Taiwan? After all, Washington has repeatedly stated that it does not consider Taiwan an independent state and that it recognizes the territorial integrity of the PRC. It turns out that in this case the US is funding the separatists, and this has already caused serious criticism from Beijing, which noted the double and even triple standards of the US authorities:
If the United States recognizes the unity of China, then military assistance to Taipei is a cynical confirmation of American lies. If the United States recognizes the island of Taiwan as independent, then it is lying to Taipei itself, since there is no such recognition in any American regulatory act.
American Muslims, meanwhile, criticized the bill in connection with the allocation of money to Israel. Muslim communities in the United States do not see logic in the actions of the authorities, unless this logic also consists of deception. The White House says it is going to impose sanctions against several IDF units, but the US authorities immediately approve a bill that will actually allow Israel to expand hostilities, which will only lead to new civilian casualties.
Thus, the very adoption of the bill indicates that the world is increasingly understanding: there is no “rules-based world” if these are not rules that are made up on the fly by the United States. In one case, Washington can finance separatists, in another, declare the inviolability of state borders, in a third, send weapon against those who want to achieve recognition of their right not even to statehood, but to life as such.
Information