Mao Zedong had grandiose plans in 1958

31
Mao Zedong had grandiose plans in 1958

What could be the reason for the large-scale mobilization of Chinese workers in the smelting of iron and steel in small-scale metallurgy in the fall of 1958?

This question has already arisen in the previous article and aroused great interest. While there are no special finds related to publications or archival documents, and while the CCP does not want to tell how everything really happened, you can take a purely analytical route and put forward a search hypothesis.



In my practice, I quite often encountered confusing topics that were not easy to understand. Such mysteries can be solved by finding and analyzing as many facts as possible related to the topic under consideration, as well as carefully studying the context, that is, the political, social and economic situation surrounding the events. The success of this enterprise largely depends on putting forward a certain hypothesis, which I call a search hypothesis, which sets the direction for the search for the necessary materials. Otherwise, even if you have a fair amount of perseverance, you can get stuck.

Certain conclusions based on facts already known to us lead to a search hypothesis that explains the background of the 1958 steel campaign, which will then need to be convincingly confirmed or refuted.

Some facts


The fact of the first.

The campaign itself, as far as one can judge, was short-lived, from late August to late December 1958. Although we now do not know exactly when exactly the campaign stopped and what then became of the built stoves, in particular, whether they were subsequently used and for how long. Let's start from what we have. Four months for the campaign.

The fact of the second.

Apparently, a lot of metal was smelted during this four-month campaign. For example, on October 18, 1958, Luzhai County of the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region smelted 207,2 thousand tons of pig iron and 288,1 thousand tons of cast iron. Apparently this is peak smelting.

However, the county did not achieve this smelting in one day. There was some initial production, then it grew and reached a peak. And after the peak, the county clearly did not stop production the next day.

Total at the peak - 495 thousand tons of metal, and if the county had smelting close to this, say, a couple of days before the peak level and a couple more days after, roughly a week, then smelting could reach 2-2,5 million tons of metal for this week .

Many districts smelted the metal, some quite a lot, so that the smelting per campaign could reach very large values, by eye 10–15 million tons of any metal, if not more. I think that the CCP does not want to publish statistics on the total production of metal by small-scale metallurgy in 1958, although they have it, because the overall figures would be so large that they would pose questions that would be difficult to answer.

At least two main questions.

First - why so much?

However, in the conditions of China at that time, excess metal was more of a benefit than a disadvantage.

Second - why so quickly, and without actually taking into account the expenditure of effort and cost?

This is a more complex question, especially in light of one fact.

The third fact.

In total, about 90 million people out of 266 million workers, or 33,8%, were mobilized. Taking into account temporary support workers, as Luo Pinghai wrote, up to 100 million people. This means that a number of sectors of the Chinese national economy then experienced a sharp outflow of personnel, not excluding agriculture. But if it was difficult to dredge up the Chinese sea of ​​peasants, then many branches of the factory industry at the end of 1958 must have been virtually locked up or sharply reduced output.

About a quarter of China's industrial output was sacrificed for iron and steel. For what?

This means that cast iron and steel at that moment had much greater value for management than all other industrial products. And this is a factor that leads to suspicions that this was all a military mobilization campaign.

Military heritage


Even from the appearance of the 1958 campaign, one can confidently judge that small metallurgy in China had long traditions and trained cadres of craftsmen, and on a decent scale. In total, there were up to 600 thousand ovens. If for every three furnaces there is one master who controls the smelting, then 200 thousand master smelters are already required.

Together with other workers who needed qualifications to work at the blast furnace or furnace, the need for personnel reached approximately half a million people. These personnel were available, since it was possible to organize a metallurgical campaign of such a scale. The unskilled workers were apparently mainly peasants, especially since the campaign itself began at the end of August, after the completion of the flood rice harvest and the beginning of the dry season, which lasts until March of the following year.

In other words, China already had a small ferrous metallurgy industry capable of smelting significant volumes of metal. On the one hand, this is generally a traditional Chinese craft. The districts that produced the greatest smelting apparently were centers of small-scale ferrous metallurgy from ancient times.

On the other hand, this is probably a legacy of wartime. The armies fighting in China needed steel and cast iron for production. weapons and ammunition. Since the needs were very great, China did not yet have its own large industry, and imports were irregular, it is not surprising that the Red Chinese, that is, the communists; White Chinese, that is, Chiang Kai-shekists; Japanese militarists and their various Chinese accomplices of an indeterminate color put all their might on the local small metallurgy industry.

This is a very little-studied issue, but I came across information that the Japanese created artisanal smelting of iron or cast iron in the occupied territories, which they then exported for processing to Manchuria or Japan. I think that all the participants in the long war in China did this, and the communists - first of all, since they could least of all count on external help.

For example, the command of the communist 8th Army in 1939 formed a military-industrial department, which created arsenals in all liberated areas. In July 1943, the 8th and 4th new armies in their arsenals produced about 10 thousand rifles, 100 thousand artillery shells, several hundred thousand mines and grenades, and about 1 million pieces of ammunition.



Production of grenades at the 8th Army factory

Another example.

Chiang Kai-shek organized the production of a 50-mm mortar type 27 (a copy of the Japanese mortar type 89) and produced 40 thousand of these mortars and 1,5 million mines during the war with the Japanese, and then 80 thousand mortars and 600 thousand mines for them during the war with the communists . In 1941–1945, the same mortar was produced by the 8th Army (2 mortars and 500 thousand mines for them).


Arsenal products in Chongqing

So, despite the industrial underdevelopment of China, both the Red and White Chinese had weapons production, and it was, of course, supplied with raw materials. And in this supply, local small-scale ferrous metallurgy played a significant role.

Reserve for a proposed war


The urgency and haste of Mao Zedong's steel drive at the end of 1958 most likely stemmed from military needs. This is indicated by certain military-political circumstances.

Firstly, back in November 1957, at a meeting of representatives of workers and communist parties in Moscow, Mao criticized N. S. Khrushchev’s policy aimed at “peaceful coexistence” with capitalist countries as anti-revolutionary and called not to be afraid of a third world war, believing that The USSR and China, through joint efforts, can put an end to the United States. Mao convinced Khrushchev of this during his visit to China from July 31 to August 3, 1958, that is, on the eve of the iron smelting campaign.

Secondly, on August 23, 1958, the Second Taiwan Strait Crisis began, which lasted until December 2, 1958. Formally, these were small battles for the islands of Kinmen and Mazu off the coast of mainland Fujian, but apparently Mao had far-reaching plans. The command of the Kuomintang army also had equally far-reaching plans for landing on the continent and advancing deep into China. In any case, similar plans were developed in 1965 with the participation of former Japanese officers.

This, of course, requires a more thorough analysis of how the situation was perceived by the Chinese communist political and military leadership at that moment. Most likely, many moments that later seemed insignificant were then regarded as a harbinger of a big war, for which it was necessary to thoroughly prepare.

And here a massive campaign to smelt iron and steel suddenly turns out to be very appropriate. If the PRC finds itself in a situation of a large-scale clash with the Chiang Kai-shekists, who are supported by the United States, and the USSR does not want to come out with all its might on the side of the Chinese communists, then the only hope is on its own forces and the local production of weapons and ammunition.

In this situation, the idea could arise that it would be very advisable to create reserves of metallurgical semi-finished products before the onset of a potential conflict: cast iron, steel and cast iron, from which weapons and ammunition would later be made.

Outline of the plan


The plan, if we follow this assumption, was, in general, probably like this.

By mass mobilization and the creation of prefabricated small metallurgy in centers with the most favorable natural and transport conditions, it was possible to achieve the smelting of several million tons of metallurgical semi-finished products. The quality of the resulting metal was unimportant, since it was then intended to be melted down in military factories and workshops by experienced craftsmen who could quite easily obtain cast iron and steel of the required quality.

The metal smelted in small blast furnaces and furnaces was not immediately used, but was stored somewhere, most likely in caches in the rear areas, where military enterprises and workshops were located. Perhaps it was not shown in open statistics. What happened to him later is unknown. It was probably subsequently used up little by little when it was decided that these reserves were no longer needed.

This was not a spontaneous campaign at all, but a carefully planned and organized military-economic operation. Many issues needed to be resolved. Among them: to supply 90 million workers with food for several months, to provide at least a minimum of work clothes and shoes, to deliver building materials and components for the construction of furnaces, iron ore mining, fuel, to transport them to processing sites, and also to organize the transportation of finished semi-finished products.

Iron ore and fuel are generally a serious problem. Iron ore had to be taken from the richest and most easily accessible, so that it could be dug with a pick and shovel and crushed by hand. Strong breeds were not suitable.


Ore grinding in Boai County, Henan Province

The furnaces had to be as close as possible to the sources of ore, because every kilometer of transportation increased costs. Trucks would need gasoline and tires, and horses would need fodder. Now, if the ore is only a couple of kilometers from the furnaces, then you can get by with Chinese wheelbarrows.


Sometimes they resorted to transporting iron ore on horses. Like, for example, in Anyang, Henan Province.

It seems that it was in such advantageous places that the stoves were installed wherever possible, including on the streets of villages and in the courtyards of houses, on any more or less convenient site. The coal was most likely charcoal, although the use of artisanal coke cannot be ruled out. These are large-scale logging, massive burning of coal and equally massive transportation of coal by all available modes of transport.


Here in the photo, most likely, coal is burned. In the background is a heap of coal that has not yet been dismantled.

In addition, there was another aspect.

During this campaign, tens of millions of workers, mostly men of military age, were concentrated in certain areas where mass smelting took place. One call from Mao, one instruction was enough to turn this economic mobilization into a military one. It seems that this point was also taken into account in the planning of the campaign, and warehouses of uniforms and weapons were deployed near such areas of concentration of small metallurgy. A few hours - and the metallurgist brigades are transformed into regiments and divisions.

All in all, it was a big undertaking that required resources, excellent planning, organization and discipline. Party cadres, trained during a long war, accustomed to following orders and not asking unnecessary questions, coped with this task quite well.

Still, one must assume that Mao then had grandiose plans, part of which was this campaign for iron and steel. So grandiose that it was very inconvenient to admit them later. If this were a purely defensive epic, then the Chinese leadership would hardly hide it, much less turn it into a stupid campaign. On the contrary, it would be a diamond in Chinese propaganda.

But here there is silence and even self-spitting. There must be a reason for this.

Now, if the plans were, for example, to bring communism at the bayonets of the PLA to Southeast Asia, India or anywhere else where the regiments of the revolutionary army could reach - then yes, it is better to be a klutz than a conspirator. Moreover, this plan did not succeed, for some, presumably, very compelling reasons.

This is how the search hypothesis turns out. Let's see where it leads and what it will give, being confirmed or refuted.
31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -3
    April 20 2024 05: 54
    The author touched on a very interesting but complex topic.
    There are also large-scale and seemingly obvious events in the history of our country, the meaning of which is absolutely unclear.

    For example, the reasons for the “Khrushchev thaw”, which seemed to suddenly fall on Soviet society precisely during the period of its most powerful economic progress.

    And also the most powerful self-spitting company associated with the “thaw”. With all the grandiose and friendly chatter of our media over the past more than half a century, this is actually one of the completely closed topics.


    These are the reasons for repression in the USSR, which are presented to the public in vague, but extremely emotional formulations. Here the history of China has clear parallels with the history of the USSR.

    Judging by the author’s earlier publications, he has always set himself difficult tasks and today he is one of the best, and his works are really worth reading and comprehending.
    1. -4
      April 21 2024 14: 22
      Quote: ivan2022
      For example, the reasons for the “Khrushchev thaw”, which seemed to suddenly fall on Soviet society precisely during the period of its most powerful economic progress.

      And what is there that is unclear? Allen Dulles conducted an active intelligence operation "Split (Disintegration Factor)"... As a result, Stalin, Beria, Abakumov, Ryumin, Belkin became agents of influence of the CIA Special Operations Department and with their hands the CIA destroyed politicians objectionable to the United States in Eastern Europe. The Thaw and de-Stalinization cleansed the leadership of the USSR from idiots who foolishly began to work against their people.
  2. +2
    April 20 2024 05: 59
    Why do people who are supposed to write cycles about people who get caught write here in the history section, they can make good money.
  3. +4
    April 20 2024 06: 08
    In other words, China already had a small ferrous metallurgy industry capable of smelting significant volumes of metal.

    But the lack of knowledge of strength materials and metal science turned these products into low-grade scrap...
    Quote: ivan2022
    There are also large-scale and seemingly obvious events in the history of our country, the meaning of which is absolutely unclear.

    The meaning of Khrushchev's thaw becomes clear when one remembers whose merits the NSH was going to belittle. Khrushchev's primitivism, the culture of the Ukrainian peasant... It was a very interesting time... It was then that questions began to arise as to why the victorious people did not have basic household appliances, while the defeated people abroad lived more beautifully.
    1. -4
      April 20 2024 06: 54
      The fact that Khrushch was not particularly developed is understandable. But he “encroached on the sacred”, he began to destroy what worked!

      But in any country, changes in ideology begin reluctantly and only because of big problems in the economy. Khrushchev abolished the “dictatorship of the proletariat” at the congress - why did it bother him? I wish I could sit and eat buns... Khrushch's stupidity alone cannot explain everything, and even a complete fool cannot reach high positions...

      At a time when the world was talking about the “Russian economic miracle,” Khrushchev stopped the implementation of the 6th Five-Year Plan and began to make adjustments, although in 4 years the country’s GDP grew by one and a half times.What for ?
      1. -1
        April 20 2024 19: 06
        Khrushchev stopped the implementation of the 6th Five-Year Plan and began to make adjustments,
        Joseph the Terrible set quite achievable plans, but Khrushchev Kukuruzny wanted everything here and now. Well, except that cargo communism did not want to be built right away, but after 20 years. I didn’t know the structure of the state and didn’t want to know. Trotskyist, one word. And seeing how it was being fulfilled, the five-year plan had to be “shifted to the right,” into the seven-year plan. Doesn't remind you of anything?
    2. -1
      April 20 2024 11: 16
      But the lack of knowledge of strength materials and metal science turned these products into low-grade scrap...

      Scrap is in any way better than a mixture of iron ore and coal. If I'm not mistaken, now half of the metal is scrap metal. Cast iron is the first process, and it is really better to do it near deposits, if only because of transport problems, as was stated in the article. By the way, a question to the author: how many in kilograms? How many kilograms of ore (even an average value) and coal are needed to smelt 1 kg of pig iron?
      1. -1
        April 20 2024 18: 31
        If without tricks, then approximately 1,8 kg of ore and 1,4 kg of coal. Consumption can vary greatly by furnace type and melting progress.
  4. +1
    April 20 2024 06: 23
    Thank you!
    The author's opinion is almost not supported by historical and archival information.
    However, it was an interesting read.
  5. +3
    April 20 2024 09: 51
    The PRC did not have the technical, financial, personnel or any opportunity to carry out Stalin’s industrialization in order to cover the gap of 50-100 years in 10 years, but it really wanted to. As political demagogues say, population is the main and most expensive resource, which was in abundance in the PRC.
    1. 0
      April 20 2024 11: 11
      In 1964 - the first Chinese nuclear weapons test. 1967 - First test of the Chinese hydrogen bomb. It took just 10 years, but now it doesn’t matter how.

      But our “dear Russians” in the 33 years since 1958 have blown everything away. And they scored all the goals into their own goal....
      Another 33 years have passed..... laughing But the pathological desire to show off and “prove something to everyone” remains from the time of Peter the Great. In its original form. hi
      1. +4
        April 20 2024 11: 42
        Well, to be fair, the USSR helped China a lot; it did not develop in a vacuum.
        https://topwar.ru/66750-kak-sssr-prevratil-kitay-v-velikuyu-yadernuyu-derzhavu.html?ysclid=lv7upji0vf501532536
        1. +3
          April 21 2024 19: 33
          Quote: Kmon
          Well, in fairness to China, the USSR helped a lot,

          To be fair, the USSR also did not develop in a vacuum, but in a capitalist environment. And supplies from the USA helped him win the Second World War. And even earlier, German and American companies created Soviet industry. There is no need to limit the time frame of justice and the frame of intelligence, first of all, of the leaders of the USSR.
          1. +1
            April 21 2024 21: 41
            Only China received help for free, and the USSR paid for everything in gold.
      2. +2
        April 20 2024 19: 07
        In 1964 - the first Chinese nuclear weapons test. 1967 - First test of the Chinese hydrogen bomb.
        And all this completely independently? Stanislavski comes to mind.
        1. -1
          April 21 2024 19: 30
          Quote: Aviator_
          And all this completely independently? Stanislavski comes to mind.

          Are you even more stubborn than Mao? Do you really need to not just “create”, but “create on your own”? Otherwise; "I do not play like that..." laughing Today, the Chinese absolutely do not care who helped them create nuclear weapons and who helped them create the industry. ...

          By the way ; The USSR, too, the West helped create industry, and then helped during WWII. There are people who know how to find allies even among opponents, and there are also “specialists on the contrary.”
          Consult Stanislavsky on this matter......
          1. +2
            April 21 2024 19: 58
            Are you even more stubborn than Mao? You definitely need to not just “create”, but “create on your own”
            Getting personal is a deadly argument.
    2. -3
      April 21 2024 14: 30
      Quote: Jacques Sekavar
      The PRC had neither technical, nor financial, nor personnel, nor any opportunity to carry out Stalin's industrialization

      There is a point of view that the PRC developed under Mao, even during the Great Leap Forward and during the Cultural Revolution, somewhat faster than during the time of Deng Xiaoping. For example, by the beginning of Deng’s reforms, the Chinese were able to create a domestic industry of mini tractors and walk-behind tractors. In the USSR they could not create such production. Moreover, the People's Republic of China created its own atom bomb at approximately the same time as the USSR. In the USSR, the difference in testing time for an atomic and hydrogen bomb is 4 years, in the PRC it’s like 3..
  6. 0
    April 20 2024 15: 58
    The author's creative efforts are very reminiscent of similar impulses of the famous O. Bender.
    Listen to what I sprinkled last night with the oscillating set of an electric lamp: "I remember a wonderful moment, you appeared before me, like a fleeting vision, like a genius of pure beauty." Really, okay? Talented? And only at dawn, when the last lines were completed, I remembered that this verse had already been written by A. Pushkin. Such a hit from a classic! BUT?

    Only the role of an insidious classic is played by the Canadian historian Donald B. Wagner, who wrote the book The traditional Chinese iron industry and its modern fate in 1997. He has a website donwagner.dk. There are a lot of sources on the issue under consideration. Including the article Background to the Great Leap Forward in Iron and Steel (Background of the Great Leap Forward in the production of iron and steel. Link https://donwagner.dk/MS-English/MS-English.html).
    1. -2
      April 20 2024 18: 34
      “Don’t you dare not scald according to the manual!!!” laughing

      You should have gone farther already.
  7. -1
    April 20 2024 18: 25
    The furnaces had to be as close as possible to the ore sources
    The furnaces had to be as close as possible to coal sources: much less ore was required.
    1. 0
      April 21 2024 00: 10
      Or electricity. If there is a source of electricity in the form of a hydroelectric power station, ore and products are easily transported by water transport. For example, such a plant can be located in a remote highland near a dam, and raw materials and products can be transported by water and by railway.
  8. -1
    April 20 2024 19: 13
    An unusual interpretation of historical events in Chinese history. Respect to the author. In 1998, at an international conference at IOFAN, one of our professors from Moscow State University suddenly spoke to a Chinese man in his language. To the surprise of the Chinese, he replied that in the 50s he helped them look for uranium deposits in the Gobi.
  9. +2
    April 20 2024 21: 57
    Few people remember the main motto of the Great Leap Forward: Prepare for war and famine! The support for this “Leap” was, of course, to be our own strengths and, first of all, revolutionary consciousness, based on the enthusiasm and unquestioning submission of the masses. What can’t you do to achieve a great goal! And these were not only plans to “catch up and surpass Britain in the smelting of iron and steel” through “domestic metallurgy.” In the process of their implementation, railway and road transport fell into disrepair en masse - neither wagons nor cars showed the proper “consciousness” under repeated unacceptable overload. Building structures collapsed because they did not heed the call for “enthusiasm” and did not agree with illiterate savings on building materials and equally unlucky engineering. Agriculture was not left out either. Thanks to deep plowing, the fertile layer of soil was destroyed. Having started dense sowing (one grain per 1 sq. cm, with the prospect of obtaining a harvest unprecedented anywhere in the world, up to 700 centners per hectare!), all plans for the future grain abundance rotted on the vine. The result was famine in the PRC, with millions of population losses still unknown. Having led the country into an economic impasse with his grandiose projects, on the wave of increasingly obvious dissatisfaction with his policies, Mao decided to send China along a different historical path. And this was an even more destructive stage of Chinese history, known as the Cultural Revolution.
  10. 0
    April 23 2024 02: 49
    All this nonsense of both Mao and the author of the article was well ridiculed in a story like Platonov’s - the point is that several million rubles were allocated for land reclamation, the competition was won not by professional engineers, but by local Kulibin, who justified his projects from the point of view of Marxism - the result was predictable)) )
  11. 0
    April 23 2024 02: 53
    Quote: ivan2022
    The fact that Khrushch was not particularly developed is understandable. But he “encroached on the sacred”, he began to destroy what worked!

    But in any country, changes in ideology begin reluctantly and only because of big problems in the economy. Khrushchev abolished the “dictatorship of the proletariat” at the congress - why did it bother him? I wish I could sit and eat buns... Khrushch's stupidity alone cannot explain everything, and even a complete fool cannot reach high positions...

    At a time when the world was talking about the “Russian economic miracle,” Khrushchev stopped the implementation of the 6th Five-Year Plan and began to make adjustments, although in 4 years the country’s GDP grew by one and a half times.What for ?

    Yes, yes, my grandmother remembered about this GDP, buying a tablecloth was an event, just like now a car, or for a teacher, and collective farmers generally wore homespun clothes.
  12. 0
    April 23 2024 17: 04
    Now, if the plans were, for example, to bring communism at the bayonets of the PLA to Southeast Asia, India or somewhere else where the regiments of the revolutionary army could reach

    The Chinese communists never had any plans to carry communism on their sticks.
    As far as I know, they had a plan to entice the Americans and their satellites onto their territory and inflict a decisive defeat on them there. The PLA had enormous experience in these operations in the battles of 1937-1953.
  13. 0
    April 26 2024 23: 28
    back in November 1957, at a meeting of representatives of workers and communist parties in Moscow, Mao criticized N. S. Khrushchev’s policy, aimed at “peaceful coexistence” with capitalist countries, as anti-revolutionary

    In the spirit of these statements, it is quite logical to assume plans to seize the banner of the world revolution from the hands of the USSR and the desire to create their own “socialist camp”. We started with enthusiasm, but then we had to give up, calculating the lack of strength without the support of our “senior comrade.” This refusal of support most likely was the true reason for the destruction of relations between the USSR and the PRC. Logical hypothesis.
    1. 0
      April 28 2024 11: 53
      Explaining everything by “World Revolution” is convenient, but too stupid. Back in 1915, Lenin wrote an article “On the slogan of the United States of Europe,” in which he foresaw the future confrontation between Western Europe and Russia. And not a world revolution at all.

      If we are to look for the reasons for the conflict with China, then we must “start from the stove” in post-Stalin politics. That is, to find the real reason for the “Khrushchev Thaw.” But to do this, we must abandon the kindergarten version: “Khrushchev was crap because he didn’t like Stalin.”

      Because the fact that someone doesn’t like someone does not change the ideology and economic policy of the state. Especially during a period of economic success.

      When the real reason for Khrushchev’s reforms is clear, then it will be possible to understand the rest.

      Mao suspected Khrushchev of something more than “revisionism for the sake of revisionism.” Therefore, when Gorbach came to China in 1989, they didn’t really listen to him either. And they did the right thing. They knew in advance what to expect from the “Russian leaders” and who they really were.
      1. 0
        April 28 2024 16: 35
        Quote: ivan2022

        When the real reason for Khrushchev’s reforms is clear, then it will be possible to understand the rest.

        It is not at all a fact that identifying the reasons for Khrushchev’s reforms will shed light on the reasons for Mao’s then-policy. They simply could have different views on further development.
  14. 0
    April 28 2024 19: 56
    The success of this enterprise largely depends on putting forward a certain hypothesis, which I call a search hypothesis, which sets the direction for the search for the necessary materials.
    -

    “- Due to the absence of an atmosphere, the corpuscular radiation of the Sun, bombarding the surface of the Moon, causes... uh... interference in radio communications. It is these obstacles that prevent...

    “Obstacles are obstacles, that’s absolutely true,” assented the Chief. “But what are they?” laughing