Massive Iranian strike on Israel may indicate Iran has nuclear weapons

The massive Iranian attack on Israel has raised the issue of a possible escalation of the conflict into a nuclear one. It is reported that the Israeli army is preparing to launch a “retaliatory strike” against Iran, but only after consultations with the United States of America. During these types of consultations, which have already begun, the issue of identifying specific targets for a “retaliatory strike” is being discussed.

Against this background, Middle Eastern sources report that the main issue for consultations with the United States is not so much the definition of goals, but rather the definition of a specific weapons to carry out a strike. And the discussion turns on the possibility of using nuclear weapons on Iranian territory.

In turn, the Iranian massive attack on Israel itself indicates that Tehran is ready for various scenarios, including nuclear. Accordingly, this indirectly indicates a high probability of Iran creating its own nuclear weapons.

Let us recall that in February of this year, the 45th President of the United States, Donald Trump, announced that Iran had entered the final stage of obtaining nuclear weapons. According to Trump at the time, Iran “could have a nuclear bomb within two weeks.” Those “two weeks” have already passed, and if you believe the statements of the former US President, Iran could well have created nuclear weapons. And by attacking Israel in response to the bombing of the consulate in Syria, Iran may well be demonstrating that it and Israel now have parity in terms of weapons, including nuclear weapons, and that this fact needs to be taken into account by both Netanyahu and the American authorities.

Comments

[Orange bigg]

. It is reported that the Israeli army is preparing to launch a "retaliatory strike" against Iran, but only after consultations with the United States of America. During such consultations, which have already begun, the issue of identifying specific targets for the "retaliatory strike" is being discussed.

I wonder what will happen now?

[Egoza]

Quote: OrangeBigg

I wonder what will happen now?

Read Zhirinovsky's opinion on this matter. Oh, and he was a smart guy. May the kingdom of heaven be upon him.

[The black]

Wasn’t Israel digging the Mediterranean Sea 5 million years ago?

[Dutchman Michel]

5 million years

According to the project of the Ukrainian research institute

[tralflot1832]

What are you hinting at, were the Great Ukrainians the foremen of the diggers of the Mediterranean Sea?

[Dimy4]

Read Zhirinovsky's opinion on this matter

Would you be so kind as to send me the link? Thank you in advance.

[Egoza]

The prophecies of the co-founder and first chairman of the LDPR, Vladimir Zhirinovsky, about the war between Israel and Iran were found online. Two videos were published in the “Rhymes and Punch” Telegram channel.

In one of the videos, Zhirinovsky says that in 2024, events may begin in the Middle East that will lead to the outbreak of the third world war. Against this background, a huge number of refugees will appear, whom the politician proposes to place on the territory of Ukraine. This will lead, among other things, to the cessation of the existence of the Ukrainian state, the politician said.

In another video, the leader of the LDPR talks about the inevitability of a nuclear conflict in the Middle East.
https://lenta.ru/news/2024/04/13/naydeno-video-prorochestva-zhirinovskogo-o-voyne-izrailya-i-irana/

We need to take into account the situation in the Middle East. By 2024, such events will unfold there that everyone will completely forget what Ukraine is. The most terrible events will happen here

https://lenta.ru/articles/2024/04/06/predskaz/

[Fatalist]

And Israel will cry out: “Help Russia!” - the words of the elders about the future of the Jews.

[cast iron]

Zhirinovsky said a lot of things. Often it’s one thing in the morning and the opposite in the evening. For example, during the second Iraq War, Zhirinovsky, in a bathhouse with some guys, confidently predicted the defeat of the United States. He was a smart guy, but not a Vanga fortune teller.

[sdivt]

Quote: Egoza

Read Zhirinovsky's opinion on this matter

It’s just that Zhirinovsky was very talkative.
In other words, he spoke not just a lot, but a lot. Accordingly, in his speeches, if you dig carefully, you can find confirmation of any, absolutely any event
And if you dig a little more, you can also find refutations of these same events)
That is, you can find anything if you set the appropriate goal.

[aszzz888]

Orange bigg
(Alexander)
+1
Today, 07: 55
...I wonder what will happen now?

A war is brewing in the east. And Isravul will receive the terrorist underdog in full.

[Letun]

For a long time the Jews have been tugging at the tiger's whiskers, now is a fair continuation of this policy. I hope this time they get a real punch in the face. Come on, Iran!

[knn54]

I wonder what if the Houthis launch a MASSIVE attack on Israel?

[Orange bigg]

The powerful Israeli missile defense system was penetrated by Khaibar missiles, originating from the USSR.

.And bye the consequences of at least seven hits on military targets in the Negev Desert and several more at other bases are being studied by the competent Israeli departments, we’ll tell you about the new missile with which the main attack took place.

. We are talking about the newest Iranian medium-range missile "Khaybar", of the "Khorramshahr" family with a liquid-propellant rocket engine. They were first presented to the military-political leadership of Iran in May 2023, and the data provided by the developers was quite impressive. The military department stated the missile range is 2000 km, the warhead is over one and a half tons and the circular probable deviation (CPD) is up to 20 meters. In all these indicators, "Khaibar" can be compared with the very dangerous American Pershing-2 missile., which, fortunately, was scrapped back in the last century, under the INF Treaty. The only difference is that it was solid fuel.

https://dzen.ru/a/Zhri2WydETyYqYt-

[Persia]

Quote: OrangeBigg

The powerful Israeli missile defense system was penetrated by Khaibar missiles, originating from the USSR.

it seems that Russian are having similar to Turk have ugly habit of claim the credit for others achievements
who ver you are quoting don't know what the fuck he is talking about
Kheibar Shekan or Kheibarshekan (Persian: خیبرشکن) is an Iranian solid-fuel medium-range ballistic missile operated by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Aerospace Force. It is of the third generation of IRGC missiles and was unveiled in 2022 at a The missile has solid fuel and in the landing phase has maneuverability in reentry phase until impact.
Iran enemy US announce the cep for this missile to be between 5 to 10
iran is only nation that created pinpoint long rang ballesric misile that makes fighte jet obsolete

Why are fighter jets being used in the first place?
Why don't we use land-based missiles instead of fighter jets for precision attacks?
There are two kinds of missiles: cruise missiles, which are accurate but lack range, and ballistic missiles, which are almost limitless in range but have very poor accuracy.
Fighter jets are used to deliver precision attacks with air-launched cruise missiles.
But why did they have to be air-launched?
Cruise missiles can't be long-range due to a problem known as "the tyranny of the rocket equation." For range, you require fuel. Fuel increases the weight, which decreases the range. So the answer they came up with was to move the missile close enough to the target with an aircraft, then launch the cruise missile. and for longer range they made aircraft carrier to move the fighter jet closer to target
But why don't we make ballistic missiles as accurate as cruise missiles to eliminate the need for fighter jets and aircraft carriers?
The ballistic missile that could go long range had a problem of its own known as "REENTRY PLASMA EFFECTS" which happens When slamming air particles into each other as fast as a reentering object does, the extreme heat from all this friction raises the temperature of the air so high that the gas becomes ionized, forming essentially a cloud of plasma around the outer surface of the craft in the reentry phase that interrupt the radio communications between a vehicle and ground station.
In simple terms, you can't guide it. Therefore, long-range ballistics are only used for nukes that lack of accuracy isn't an issue.
So obviously, when Iran announced that they somehow developed ballistic missiles with pinpoint accuracy, everyone dismissed it as propaganda. Even after Iran released the footage of a ballistic missile hitting the target with pinpoint accuracy,. Iran was accused of Photoshopping, despite the lack of any evidence to suggest the footage was altered. But after the attack on the US air base that all missiles achieved bullseye, everyone had to accept the fact that, just like the Persians were the only ones with Damascus steel technology, now they repeated similar unachievable technology. Uzi Robbin, the father of Israel's missile defense, said this in reaction to Iran's pinpoint ballistic missile. "By pushing a button, they were able to accomplish a task that we need to risk the lives of pilots and costly fighter jets to do the same. and they probably were under air conditions when they pushing the button"
Conclusion: iran doesn't need any aircraft or aircraft carrier to diliver precision attacks

[Orange bigg]

Ground-based ballistic missiles are more expensive and larger than air-launched cruise missiles or glide bombs, which are relatively cheap and, as a result, more widespread. Aircraft missiles are more mobile due to aviation. An airplane can fly 1000 km in an hour and carry air-launched cruise missiles over the same distance, which increases their damage radius (aircraft flight radius + flight radius of a missile fired from an airplane).

[Orange bigg]

Ground-based launchers with missiles are not as mobile as aviation as a platform for launching aircraft cruise missiles, and cannot travel long distances in a short time, as aviation can; ground-based launchers are, as a result, easier to find and destroy.

[Orange bigg]

Regarding the insufficient flight range of cruise missiles, this is debatable. The destruction range of the Kh-50 cruise missile is 1500 km, the Kh-101 is more than 3500 km. The Dagger is 2000 km. All of these missiles are air-launched and to their radius you can add the flight radius of their carrier along with these missiles by board.

[bayard]

Quote: OrangeBigg

The destruction range of the Kh-50 cruise missile is 1500 km, the Kh-101 is more than 3500 km.

The range of the X-50 with a conventional\conventional warhead is 1500 km. The range with a special warhead is about 2500 km.
Range of X-101 - 4500 km.
Range of X-102 - 5500 km. (the same in a special version).

[stankow]

Much harder to find. In the forests and let it go. And aviation, as we know, is stationed at airfields.

[Orange bigg]

Translation of your post.

It seems that Russians, like Turks, have an ugly habit of taking credit for the achievements of others
the people you're referring to don't know a damn thing what they're talking about
Kheybar Shekan or Kheybarshekan (Persian: خیبرشکن) is an Iranian solid-fuel medium-range ballistic missile used by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Aerospace Force. It belongs to the third generation of IRGC missiles and was presented in 2022 at the exhibition a. The rocket runs on solid fuel and is maneuverable during the landing phase until it re-enters the atmosphere before impact.
Iran, an enemy of the United States, announces that the efficiency of this missile is between 5 and 10
units, Iran is the only country to have developed a precision-guided long-range ballistic missile that makes jet fighters obsolete

Why are fighter jets used in the first place?
Why don't we use ground-launched missiles instead of fighter jets for precision attacks?
There are two types of missiles: cruise missiles, which are highly accurate but have limited range, and ballistic missiles, which have virtually unlimited range but are very effective.

[aszzz888]

knn54
(Nikolai)
+1
Today, 08: 13
New
I wonder what if the Houthis launch a MASSIVE attack on Israel?

Then kirdyk to Israel. Negotiations will be requested. Who will stay?

[novel66]

I don't think anyone will agree to negotiate. They'll beat you all the way

[Thrifty]

The Persians should have fired missiles at Dimona and carried out Jewish nuclear facilities so that they could breathe deeply their native radiation!°

[former soldier]

I wonder what will happen now?

What should happen if the US and Israel together shot down almost all of the 300 missiles and drones launched by Iran? Israeli facilities were not damaged. What could be the continuation? What should Israel and the US expect in response to Iran?

[Orange bigg]

This is data voiced by the Israeli side. One of the parties to the conflict, and therefore an interested party. So I would not particularly trust the data below.

Iran fired more than 14 drones and missiles at Israel on the night of April 300, writes The New York Times with reference to Israeli officials. Most of the air threats were intercepted. In total, Iran launched 185 drones and 36 cruise missiles, as well as 110 surface-to-surface missiles. It is noted that the US military shot down dozens of them, but most drones and missiles were intercepted by the Israeli army.

[former soldier]

This is the data announced by the Israeli side... I would not particularly trust the data below.

....... Most of the air threats were intercepted. In total, Iran launched 185 drones and 36 cruise missiles, as well as 110 surface-to-surface missiles. It is noted that the US military shot down dozens of them, but most of the drones and missiles were intercepted by the Israeli army.

If there is no third-party information about the destruction on Israeli territory, does that mean the effectiveness of the joint Israeli/US missile defense system is close to 99%? It can not be so. Of course, most likely, US missile defense/air defense systems based on ships, land, and aircraft were also concentrated or configured to intercept on the Iran-Israel routes going over Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan. The next echelon is the Israeli missile defense system - the Iron Dome and aviation. But still, some of the 300 Iranian funds should have arrived. Let's wait for new information.
PS If Iran has 2-3 nuclear missiles, then with such a missile defense density it will be difficult for them to reach the target.

[Orange bigg]

According to some reports, all Khaybar ballistic missiles reached their targets, that is, they penetrated the Israeli missile defense system. And the UAVs could have been launched to open the air defense, overload it, or for a diversionary maneuver.

[bk316]

According to some reports, all Khaybar ballistic missiles reached their targets, that is, they penetrated the Israeli missile defense system.

Yes, even if you believe the Jews, and they are certainly lying. Then 99% are several warheads that have reached their target. Iran will easily repeat this, bringing it to 10-15 warheads. 15 dirty bombs is the end of Israel. There will be no more promised land.

[Persia]

Yes, even if you believe the Jews, and of course they lie. That 99% is a few warheads that have reached the target. Iran will easily repeat this, bringing it to 10-15 warheads. 15 dirty bombs are the end of Israel. There will be no more and more of the promised land.

They were unable to intercept even one Iranian ballistic missile, because it is impossible to do even theoretically.
I am sure that most users of this site know how a missile defense system works in principle.
but for those who don't, I'll try to explain the basics.
It's like hitting a bullet with a bullet: this is only possible for ballistic missiles with a predictable trajectory from start to finish. This allowed the computer to determine the optimal location of the interceptor relative to the missile to ensure a collision.
But I will give an example of the reliability of their declared quantity
(USA and Israel)) claimed 99% success against Saddam's ballistic missiles, luckily for us they had to declassify the actual data and the success rate was only 9 percent.
it gets worse
when you study the method, you quickly realize that they didn't intercept a damn thing, and they scored that 9 percent because they couldn't find the impact point of some missiles, so they declared them successful interceptions.
These people have the audacity to claim that Russia and Iran are exaggerating their military power when we know from their own evidence that they have changed 0% success to 99% success.
in fact, the latest investigation carried out by the American showed that anti-missiles against missiles such as Iskandar and Qiam only improve morale, but are useless in practice.

which explain why you were literally jailed as a spy if you shared any video of Iran's operation
the fact that they cut off Citizen's Internet access during the attack, and their decision that sharing videos you recorded is the same as sharing classified information with the enemy, tells me that the level of destruction must be similar to the level of destruction in Gaza Strip on target bases, they are scared to death and madly share videos of the operation or its consequences (destruction)

[Synoid]

A nuclear charge does not have to be on a rocket;)

[bayard]

Quote: Former soldier

Is the effectiveness of the joint Israeli/US missile defense system close to 99%?

Don't you believe your eyes?
There are so many videos on YouTube, Telegram, etc. about exactly how ballistic missiles pass air defense echelons. It is the final sections of their flight that are very well captured, the acceleration of their BB with the operation of the accelerator engine is about 3-4 seconds. And the very destruction of targets with multiple hits. And you really didn’t see this?
There are no reports from the sites of the hits, but this is understandable; Israel has always hidden its losses and did not recognize any direct or indirect evidence. But in the modern world, such a show is impossible for dozens and hundreds of observers to film. YouTube is full of footage of spectacular hits and the impotence of air defense. Perhaps because the BBs maneuvered and accelerated in the final section. But interceptions on earlier sections of the flight are possible, and there most likely were interceptions.

Quote: Former soldier

out of 300 Iranian funds should have made it.

185 + 36 + 110 = 341 UAVs and missiles in a salvo.
Moreover, the "Shaheds" simply loaded and unloaded air defense and interceptor fighters. Cruise missiles did about the same. But the IRBMs worked quite effectively. But the strikes were carried out on military targets, not on cities, so we are unlikely to see footage from the impact sites. However, it is the weekend now, so we will see what the officials report next week.

Quote: Former soldier

Even if Iran has 2-3 nuclear missiles, then with such a density of missile defense it will be difficult for them to reach the target.

I think there are at least an order of magnitude more armed missiles. And I repeat - Iran's new IRBMs are very effective and accurate. The US and Kurdish terrorists have already felt this. In addition, American observers noted that some of the Iranian missiles used ... multiple warheads. I think that in reality the warheads were not multiple, but in the final section the missile ejected false targets, which were mistaken for multiple warheads. In addition, everyone saw the short-term acceleration in the final section (perhaps non-specialists did not understand what they saw) and any specialist will tell you that such IRBMs are very difficult targets for any existing air defense. And Iranian engineers can be congratulated on such a success.
So, in my opinion, even without a complete defusing of Israel's long-range missile defense, about 50% of missiles with nuclear warheads will reach their target. And that's a lot. For Israel, with its size, that's definitely a lot (of nuclear warheads that have broken through, if that happens). I wouldn't recommend testing that. It's better to let the conflict slide than to test in practice how many nuclear warheads will break through the missile defense system.

[Synoid]

Look on the Internet and don't embarrass yourself. Dozens of objects were hit, dozens of Israeli soldiers were destroyed, hundreds were wounded. Feel free to use a search engine.

[former soldier]

Look on the Internet and don't embarrass yourself. Dozens of objects were hit, dozens of Israeli soldiers were destroyed, hundreds were wounded. Feel free to use a search engine.

So it seems like the shooting down of everything is the first official Israeli reaction to the Iranian strike. Who should I trust?

[former soldier]

Look on the Internet and don't embarrass yourself. Dozens of objects were hit, dozens of Israeli soldiers were destroyed, hundreds were wounded. Feel free to use a search engine.

Why should I embarrass myself?

Official message from the White House:

Statement by President Joe Biden on Iran's attacks on the State of Israel
HOUSE
BRIEFING ROOM
STATEMENTS AND RELEASES
Earlier today, Iran - and its proxies operating from Yemen, Syria and Iraq - launched an unprecedented air attack on military targets in Israel. I condemn these attacks in the strongest possible terms.

At my direction, to support Israel's defenses, the US military has deployed missile defense aircraft and destroyers to the region over the past week. Thanks to this deployment and the exceptional skill of our military personnel we helped Israel shoot down almost all incoming drones and missiles.

[Synoid]

Believe your eyes, not the Anglo-Saxons and their sixes. The Internet is full of photos and videos of arrivals;)

[Andrey Moskvin]

We must wait for an angry statement from the Japanese Foreign Ministry that Iran may launch a nuclear strike AGAIN.

[firemann]

I really want to respond with a picture

[Msi]

indirectly speaks of the high probability of Iran creating its own nuclear weapons

I hope Iran managed to create nuclear weapons...

[aszzz888]

Msi
(MSi)
+1
Today, 07: 57
New
indirectly speaks of the high probability of Iran creating its own nuclear weapons

I hope Iran managed to create nuclear weapons...

The latest news on this topic was a long time ago. And even then the figure was close to 97% enrichment. It can be assumed that Iran ALREADY HAS nuclear weapons.

[The black]

Even at the time of 2023, there was a general opinion in NATO countries that Iran has 10-15 nuclear warheads with a capacity of 10 kilotons, the carriers of which could be Iranian medium-range strategic ballistic missiles... so, most likely there are.

[Dutchman Michel]

It can be assumed that Iran ALREADY HAS nuclear weapons

One can also assume that Israel will soon feel it on its own skin

[aszzz888]

Dutchman Michel
(Michel)
0
Today, 08: 15
New
It can be assumed that Iran ALREADY HAS nuclear weapons
One can also assume that Israel will soon feel it first hand wink

Of course, not everything is so simple regarding the use of nuclear weapons, but if Iran has nothing to lose, then ANYTHING is possible.

[aszzz888]

Just now, in a previous article, I gave a post on this topic -

The massive Iranian attack on Israel has raised the issue of the possible escalation of the conflict into a nuclear one.

[svp67]

Accordingly, this indirectly indicates a high probability of Iran creating its own nuclear weapons.

With nuclear weapons, not everything is so simple. Even if Iran was able to accumulate enough weapons-grade uranium or plutonium to create several dozen special warheads for its missiles, it still cannot be 100% confident in their performance without testing. There are a lot of nuances when creating nuclear weapons, and failure to fulfill one of them can turn nuclear weapons into an “unusual firecracker.” But Israel was able to test its nuclear weapons and verify their functionality.

[aszzz888]

svp67
(Sergei)
0
Today, 08: 09
..if Iran was able to accumulate enough weapons-grade uranium or plutonium to create several dozen special warheads for its missiles, then it still cannot be 100% confident in their performance without testing....

There are good nuclear teachers from other countries. I won't point my finger where.

[The black]

Considering the area of ​​Israel, any arrival of a nuclear-capable missile, even just one, could be a disaster for Israel

[aszzz888]

The black
+1
Today, 08: 17
New
Considering the area of ​​Israel, any arrival of a nuclear-capable missile, even just one, could be a disaster for Israel

In fact of the matter. And those in a closed glass glass that was dropped on the stones will immediately feel it).

[svp67]

Quote: Black

the arrival of a nuclear-powered missile, even just one, could be a disaster for Israel

Everything will depend on the power of the special warhead and where it “flies” and alone, this is not a disaster, but rather a tragedy. Israel is still a fairly mountainous country, that is, the terrain itself protects against such attacks. Japan, even two strikes did not destroy

[Arisaka]

So Japan is a big country. Here on a real scale are Japan, Ukraine, Israel against the backdrop of Europe. on the other hand, Israel simply does not have the population to survive this.

[svp67]

Quote from Arisaka

So Japan is a big country.

Yes, compared to Israel it is big, only it consists of islands and the city of Nagasaki is located on the island of Kyushu, not the largest of them.

[fsvlad]

Deza: Crimea with new territories is the wrong color :)

[Arisaka]

I can't do anything here))

[bk316]

Everything will depend on the power of the special warhead and where it will “fly” and single,

I already wrote about Israel, it is more expedient to use a dirty bomb. And naturally on the cities and coast. They have nowhere to evacuate.

[avdkrd]

It is unlikely that Iran, in creating nuclear weapons, relied only on theoretical calculations. I would assume the participation of North Korea, even up to the transfer of finished products. They could share technologies from the heart.
It is interesting that several years ago, Iran already announced that it has something cooler than nuclear weapons.

[Anatole Klim]

Quote: svp67

can turn nuclear weapons into an “unusual firecracker.”

Remember the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, but there was not weapons-grade uranium, but lower radioactivity, but both Pripyat and Chernobyl had to be evacuated, large areas were contaminated. If an Iranian nuclear charge does not work or is shot down over Israeli territory, then huge areas will be contaminated with radioactive pieces and dust. Given the size of Israel's territory, the exodus of the Jews will be inevitable.

[Cartographer]

Quote: Anatol Klim

and lower radioactivity

Higher. And completely different isotopes. Compare Hiroshima and Pripyat.

[cast iron]

The Chernobyl accident cannot be compared with the consequences of a nuclear explosion. Various kinds of events. And, by the way, in terms of radioactive contamination, an accident at a nuclear power plant will be worse than a nuclear explosion.

[Anatole Klim]

Cartographer
(Michael)

Higher. And completely different isotopes. Compare Hiroshima and Pripyat.

Quote: cast iron

The Chernobyl accident cannot be compared with the consequences of a nuclear explosion. Various kinds of events. And, by the way, in terms of radioactive contamination, an accident at a nuclear power plant will be worse than a nuclear explosion.

I responded to a comment that Iran has not yet tested a nuclear weapon and is not confident that it will work. I am not an expert, but I have an idea of ​​what a dirty bomb is and wrote that if an Iranian nuclear charge does not work or is shot down and destroyed, this will lead to radioactive contamination of Israeli territory. I didn’t talk about any nuclear explosion, I just noticed that nuclear reactors at nuclear power plants use low-enriched uranium, and nuclear weapons use more highly enriched uranium, but I don’t know which one is more dangerous. Whoever gets radiation sickness will not care.

[Non-fighter]

100-115 tons of radioactive materials flew out of the reactor at Chernobyl. There is about 25 kilos of fissile (radioactive) material in a nuclear bomb; the Iranians, due to imperfect technology, have more, but still the numbers differ by 100 times.

[svp67]

Quote: Anatol Klim

Remember the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant,

There are more radioactive elements in any reactor than in any atomic charge, since they are simply much larger in volume

[Anatole Klim]

[quoteNot_a fighter
(Novel)
100-115 tons of radioactive materials flew out of the reactor at Chernobyl. In a nuclear bomb there is well 25 kilos of fissile (radioactive) material,] [/ Quote]

Quote: svp67

There are more radioactive elements in any reactor than in any atomic charge,

Based on your comments, a destroyed nuclear charge over Israeli territory is such a small thing compared to a destroyed nuclear reactor. The volume and mass are small, well, then ask the Serbs who got cancer from lying around depleted uranium shells after NATO aggression, tell this to the Jews, what NATO criminals tell the Serbs.

[Cartographer]

Quote: Anatol Klim

Based on your comments, a destroyed nuclear charge over Israeli territory is such a small thing compared to a destroyed nuclear reactor

On a national scale, yes. In addition, the crash site can be decontaminated. The Yankees repeatedly dropped atomic bombs from airplanes.

[sifgame]

When I asked local Jews the exact same question about the Israeli atomic bomb, they assured me that computer modeling can do anything!

[Non-fighter]

Ugums. They also had a joint test with South Africa when this state existed.

[Arisaka]

yeah, the Vela incident.

The Vela incident, sometimes called the South Atlantic Glimmer, was a double flare characteristic of a nuclear explosion in the atmosphere, recorded on September 22, 1979 by the American satellite Vela 6911 in the vast region surrounding the Prince Edward Islands.

[bk316]

With nuclear weapons, not everything is so simple.

Yeah, what about the dirty bomb?
Any country with a nuclear power plant can easily make a dirty bomb.
Any dirty bomb for a country the size of Israel is a disaster.

[Incvizitor]

Well, if our authorities are not sheep, then the ships to Iran were clearly not empty, and given the rearmament but new nuclear weapons, Iran should have a dozen other old poplars...

[Dutchman Michel]

That's great! This time the issue with Israel will be closed completely!

[cast iron]

There is nothing "different" about war. Especially in nuclear.

[Dutchman Michel]

There is nothing "different" about war.

I see you are one of those who are ready to give up territory, “if only there would be no war”

[cast iron]

Are you one of those who, using one general phrase, can determine a person’s worldview, character and inner beliefs? I envy your unparalleled insight :)

[Dutchman Michel]

Are you one of those who, using one general phrase, can determine a person’s worldview, character and inner beliefs?

I can feel it even through my tablet screen

[cast iron]

You urgently need to go to the shooting of “Battle of Psychics.” You will win outright against everyone.

[U-58]

However, the likelihood of the conflict escalating into the “nuclear” phase is currently low. What can Israel do?
Massive air raids on industrial facilities - factories for the production of drones, missiles, nuclear centers, energy facilities.
Targeted strikes on the headquarters of Iran's military-political leadership are also possible.
And there is no doubt that the US and its allies will support the defeat of the designated targets. It is possible that NATO, Australia, New Zealand, and perhaps Pakistan (a controversial candidate) will establish a naval blockade of Iran.
At the same time, the United States will categorically object to the use of nuclear weapons by both sides, because the consequences for the entire world community will be unpredictable.

[Ezekiel 25-17]

It would be better if it were: then the illegal Zionist entity will be more careful.

[tralflot1832]

Someone will be in trouble if an earthquake of unknown origin happens in Iran today or tomorrow.

[GUKTU76]

Quote: svp67

There are a lot of nuances when creating nuclear weapons, and failure to fulfill one of them can turn nuclear weapons into an “unusual firecracker”

This "cracker" is called a dirty bomb. The consequences of its use do not end with cotton.

[Roman Efremov]

I don’t understand Jews, I just don’t understand!!! After all, they are considered smart people - and obediently sacrifice themselves on the orders of Washington! Is it really not clear how it will all end, given their tiny territory and crowded population??? They will drop a “dirty bomb” on them sooner or later - and there will be a new Exodus of the eternally persecuted people. After all, if you shoot down a bomb, don’t shoot it down, the result is the same, no missile defense system will help.................................... .

[Mazunga]

It’s not Washington who orders, my friend, but the other way around))

[Roman Efremov]

Did you order yourself to become suicides?

[Sergey3]

What can I say: beautiful
https://vk.com/video-186730393_456255285
They write that this is in Israel, although I somehow doubt it, the distance for such a salvo is large!

[Mazunga]

Surely the Persians have already whipped up a vigorous loaf, but why not, Pakistan has it, India has us at hand and we are rooting for a long time, it was high time to get one, not at the same time as Israel’s cheeks were puffed out

[Knell wardenheart]

I don’t think that Iran can have a “pluto” in the foreseeable future, they simply have nothing to produce it in significant quantities (at least for now), the increase in the volume of centrifuges and manichka at the enrichment level suggests that they can simply create some kind of “uranium bomb” design, such as, for example, a cannon bomb or some more modern one. Since this will not be a “pluto” option, placing it on a rocket will, in principle, be quite a task, and in general it will be a damn ineffective product. I would sit quietly in the place of Iran until there are 10-15 such farts, or even better, I would work in the “pluto” direction, because the scheme is more compact and, in general, the direction is suitable for further evolution into a hydrogen bomb.

[Mikhail Dadeko]

If the DPRK has nuclear weapons and delivery systems, then why can’t Iran have the same? Let's have some fun, after all, it's time to cut this "Proudian knot"!

[fsvlad]

The exchange of blows will continue, but this is not the time for a nuclear argument. Bye. The territory is not ready for mass resettlement.

[abc_alex]

Quote: Mikhail Dadeko

If the DPRK has nuclear weapons and delivery systems, then why can’t Iran have the same? Let's have some fun, after all, it's time to cut this "proud knot"!

Because nuclear weapons are a complex technological task. In addition to enrichment technology (and it is now essentially the only one in the world and only a few states own it and are not inclined to share it with ANYONE), related production is needed, in particular a certain high level of mechanical engineering and chemistry.
The DPRK, if you don't know, began its nuclear program in the 50s by sending its students to Soviet universities. Then in the mid-60s, the USSR built it an IRT-2000 reactor that produces plutonium. And only in the 80s did the DPRK begin to independently build a new reactor using the same scheme with graphite. And it began a program of separating spent nuclear fuel with the separation and accumulation of plutonium. Since 90, they began experiments with explosives. And only in 2006 did it announce its first nuclear test.

As for Iran, most of its “nuclear program” is a lie by Israeli intelligence and politicians with the goal of eliminating the strongest political competitor in the Middle East through the hands of the United States. The IAEA has repeatedly conducted inspections and issued an unequivocal conclusion - Iran does not have the means to create nuclear weapons. As well as the possibility of enriching uranium to weapons-grade levels. Israel, however, immediately came up with a new lie about Iran’s “secret factories” and “underground factories.” By the way, he regularly starts yelling about this topic, as soon as a demand arises at the international level for Israel to declare and give access to its nuclear weapons. Let me remind you that Israel has it. And what is happening now in Gaza makes it clear that there will be no ethical barriers for the Jews to launch 100 kilotons into a large city, especially amid cries about the Holocaust.

[Seraphimamur]

Yes. From the fact of having enriched uranium to create a bomb to this bomb is a big step. Other components from ultra-pure materials are also needed. And this is also technology.

[bone1]

"Testimony" is possible only in the only case - if Iran fires a nuclear missile at the Jews

[Sergey Prutkov55]

To cause irreparable damage to Israel, dirty uranium charges are enough. Even shot down over Israel. What difference does it make whether there was a shock wave or not, if it is no longer possible to live there?

[Seraphimamur]

I don't understand how Iran will fight Israel. There are three countries and a distance of 2000 km between them. They can only spit on each other in the air. And that's if the countries lying between them don't shoot down planes, missiles, and drones flying over them.