The fate of Volga Bulgaria

31
The fate of Volga Bulgaria
I. Aidarov. Fall of the Great Bulgar


В previous article it was told about the completion of the famous western campaign of the tumens Subedei and Jebe, the defeat of the seemingly invincible Mongols on the banks of the Volga and the return of the remnants of this corps to Genghis Khan. And what happened next?



Mongol conquest of Volga Bulgaria


Just 6 years later (in 1229) - after the election of Ogedei as the great khan and the appointment of the ruler of the ulus of Jochi Batu, a 30-strong Mongol army again invaded the territory of Bulgaria and its vassals. Here the Mongols met stubborn resistance, and they managed to completely conquer these lands only in 1236. At the last stage of the war, the invading army was led by Subedei, who fought in Western China from 1229 to 1232. But he, according to the “Secret History of the Mongols,”

“met strong resistance from those peoples and cities whose conquest he was entrusted with under Genghis Khan.”

As a result, in 1234 Ogedei was forced to issue a decree on the mobilization of forces throughout the empire - the last in stories of this country:

“The eldest son is obliged to send to war both by those great princes-princes who manage their destinies, and by those who do not have such under their jurisdiction. Noyons-temniks, thousand-managers, centurions and foremen, as well as people of all conditions, are obliged to send the eldest of their sons to war in the same way. Likewise, both princesses and sons-in-law will send their eldest sons to war.”

The youngest son of Genghis Khan Kulkan, the sons of the Great Khan Ogeedei Guyuk and Kadan, his nephews Batu, Ordu, Shiban and Tangut (sons of Jochi), Mengu and Buchek (sons of Tuluy), Buri and Baydar (sons of Chagatai), were to take part in the new campaign. as well as Subedey-bagatur and Burundai-batyr (the future triumphant in the battle on the Sit River, in which Grand Duke Yuri Vsevolodovich of Vladimir died).

Batu Khan was appointed nominal commander-in-chief, but real power over the army was in the hands of Subedei. The decisive offensive began in the late summer of 1236. The main cities of Volga Bulgaria - Bulgar and Bilyar - fell. Most of the Bulgar aristocrats then recognized the power of the Mongols and stopped resistance. According to some reports, it was the Bulgars who knew how to fight in forest areas who played a decisive role in the encirclement and defeat of Yuri Vsevolodovich’s army in the City.

Mentioned in previous article The Mordovian prince Purgas took his last battle 30 km from modern Penza, in a fortress called either Burkas or Sernya - now in its place is the Zolotarevskoye settlement, where the remains of about 2 thousand people were found.

Another Mordovian prince, Puresh, went over to the side of the Mongols and took part in the Western campaign of Batu Khan. Apparently, the Mongols used them as “cannon fodder.” Matthew of Paris, referring to the testimony of captured Tatars, wrote about the Mongol army:

“The Mordan tribes are ahead. They destroy all people indiscriminately. Not one of them dares to put sandals on his feet until he kills a man.”

The ending was sad: having suffered huge losses, on April 8, 1241, the Mordovians refused to take part in the famous Battle of Legnica, which took place the next day.

Subedei ordered Puresh to take his army to the rear, supposedly for rest, giving weapon The troops that took their place at night killed the Moksha prince, his son Atyamas and all the Mordovians. According to a popular legend, Puresh's daughter Narchatka (Narchat), having learned about the death of her father and brother, raised an uprising in 1242, which was brutally suppressed by the Mongols.


Monument near the village of Narovchat

Some believe that it was then (and not in 1236) that the Sernya (Burkas) fortress, besieged by the Tatars, perished, on the site of which the Zolotarevskoye settlement is located.
Volga Bulgaria became one of the Horde uluses. Before the founding of Sarai Batu, the capital of the Jochids was the city of Bulgar, in which, according to Karamzin, in addition to the Volga Bulgars lived

“Votiaks, Cheremis, Mordovians who left the Rostov regions during the baptism of the Russian land.”

The emergence of the Kazan kingdom


In 1395, the Bulgar cities on the Volga were devastated by the troops of Tamerlane, which led to a long period of decline of these lands. In 1438, the Golden Horde Khan Ulu-Mukhammed (“Greater Muhammad”), the Khan of the Golden Horde and Crimea, having been defeated by Kuchuk-Mukhamed (“Lesser or Small Muhammad”), founded a new state on the site of the Volga Bulgaria and the Chuvash land, which occupied the territory from Vyatka to the Volga and from the Oka to the Kama and the mouth of the Belaya River. In the Kazan Chronicler you can read:

“And you will find (Ulu-Muhammad) a place on the Volga, in Russian Ukraine itself, in this country of the Kama River, with one end adjacent to the Bulgarian land, and the other end to Vyatka and Perm.”


Ulu-Muhammad on the miniature of the Facial Vault during the campaign against Murom

The borders of the Kazan kingdom in the south reached modern Volgograd, in the north they ran along the Pizhma River (from its mouth to the mouth of the Voya River), along the Vyatka River to the upper reaches of the Kama, in the west the border was the banks of the Volga and Sura, in the east the Kazan Kingdom bordered on the Nogai Horde . Moreover, the subjects of the Kazan kings were not nomads, but farmers. The secular Russian writer of the 16th century Ivan Peresvetov wrote:

“And I heard about this land, about the kingdom of Kazan, from many warriors who were in this Kazan kingdom, that they talk about it and compare it with the paradise land due to its great fertility.”


Kazan kingdom on the map

However, some believe that the true founder of this state was the eldest son of Ulu-Muhammad Mahmud (Mamotyak), who, according to the Resurrection Chronicle:

“He took the city of Kazan, killed the patrimony of the Kazan prince Libey, and sat down to reign in Kazan.”

The Nikon Chronicle reports the same thing:

“Tsar Mamutyak came from Kurmysh, took Kazan, and killed the Kazan prince Azy, and he himself reigned in Kazan, and from there the Kazan kingdom began to exist.”

That is, here the eldest son of Ulu-Muhammad appears in the role of the Prophetic Oleg - like the famous prince, he kills the ruler of Kazan on the grounds that he is not a member of the ruling dynasty.


Mamutyak sends his army to Moscow

One way or another, the capital of the state, founded either by Ulu-Muhammad or his son, became the city of Kazan, which is believed to have been one of the border fortresses of Volga Bulgaria. Despite the “millennium” celebrated in 2005, Kazan was first mentioned in a historical source only in 1391. After this city, the new state began to be called the Kazan Kingdom (Khanate). During its existence, in addition to minor border skirmishes and raids, 11 major wars with the Russian state were recorded, 6 of them were started by Kazan citizens, 5 by Russians.

The first campaign of the Kazan people against the Russian lands took place in 1439; the Moscow and Tver Chronicles report that the Khan’s troops failed to take Moscow, but they pretty much plundered the surrounding area. And in 1444, Nizhny Novgorod was captured by the Kazan people. When trying to recapture this strategically important city, on July 7, 1445, the troops of Vasily II were defeated by the army of the already mentioned son of Ulu-Muhammad, Mahmud. Among others, the Grand Duke and his cousin Mikhail Vereisky were captured. Then Suzdal was also plundered.

In terms of its consequences, this was one of the most terrible and humiliating defeats of the Russian troops from the Tatars. The amount requested for the release of the Grand Duke was so great that the state did not have the money to ransom other prisoners, who were eventually sold on slave markets.


Vasily II swears on a crucifix to pay a ransom, miniature of the Facial Vault

There were even rumors among the people that the Grand Duke ceded Moscow to the Kazan Tsar.

Vasily II had to agree to the construction of mosques in Russian cities and transfer Gorodets Meshchersky to the Kazan princes Kasim and Yakub “to feed,” which became known as the Tsarevich Town - and then the name Kasimov was assigned to it. For all this, the Grand Duke was publicly reproached by his rival, Dmitry Shemyaka, who then ordered Vasily II to be blinded (and this prince went down in history under the nickname “Dark”).

Karamzin wrote that “five peoples lived in the Kazan kingdom: Mordovians, Chuvash, Votyaks (in the Arsk region), Cheremis and Bashkirs.” And also that the “Mughals” and “Bulgars” “made up one people, the remnants of which are now called the Kazan Tatars.” However, only the ruling dynasty of the Chingizids was Mongolian (Tatar) in this state. Tsars (khans) in Rus' were often called Kazan, their subjects - Kazan or Kazan Tatars. Thus, in the Resurrection Chronicle under 1478 it is reported:

“In the summer of 6986 (1478), that winter, when the prince was great in Novgorod, the Tsar of Kazan came unknown to Vyatka and captured a multitude of people in the village.”

And here is the chronicle message about the raid of 1537:

“News began to come that the Kazan king Safa-Girey was gathering with many people from Kazan and other hordes, with Crimeans and Nogai, and was thinking of going to the Kostroma places and the Galich ones.”

In 1469, the Russians managed to take revenge for the defeats of 1444–1445, and in 1487, the army of Ivan III took Kazan by storm, and the pro-Moscow khan Muhammad-Emin sat on the throne there.


Miniature of the Facial Vault, illustrating the capture of Kazan by Ivan III in 1487.

The text at the bottom of this thumbnail reads:

“And they took the city of Kazan on the 9th day of July, and captured the king of Kazan Alegam with his mother and the queen, two brothers and a sister, and with his princes, and brought them to Moscow.”

After this victory, Ivan III began to call himself as follows: “Grand Duke of Vladimir, and Moscow, and Novgorod, and Pskov, and Tver, and Ugorsk, and Vyatka, and Perm, and Bulgaria, and others” (for example, in a contract document with Roman Emperor Maximilian).

Please note: Ivan III still calls himself the Bulgarian Prince, and this is a symbolic title - without territories, and the land of the former Volga Bulgaria was owned by the Kazan Chingizid kings.

In 1521, Sahib Geray, the brother of the Crimean Khan Mengli Geray, came to power in Kazan: the Kazan people made a joint campaign against the Russian lands, uniting their troops near Kolomna and forcing Vasily III to first hide in a haystack and then flee to Volokolamsk.

In 1532, Vasily III managed to place the pro-Moscow Khan Jan-Ali on the Kazan throne. But in 1535, Vasily’s protege died, and a representative of the Crimean dynasty, Safa-Girey, again came to power in Kazan.

The Kazan Gireys (Gerai), who were allies of the Crimean Khanate, were principled opponents of the Moscow state, and in 1521–1547. About 40 raids on Russian lands were recorded. The number of Russian slaves on the territory of this Khanate reached 100 thousand people. When, under the terms of the peace treaty concluded after the Second Campaign of Ivan the Terrible, the people of Kazan undertook to release them, in Sviyazhsk alone food was allocated to 60 thousand people returning to their homeland.

The problem of the Kazan threat was finally resolved by Ivan IV, who made three campaigns against this khanate and annexed it to the Russian lands in 1552. By the way, along with the Russian troops, Tatar detachments from the Kasimov Khanate, which was already in vassal dependence on Moscow, also went to Kazan.


P. Korovin. Capture of Kazan


N. Roerich. Conquest of Kazan (sketch of a panel for the Kazansky railway station in Moscow)

The inhabitants of the conquered lands professed Islam, which did not prevent the Orthodox Christian Ivan IV from declaring himself Tsar of Kazan. This title then passed to the Godunovs and Romanovs.

The last Tsar of Kazan was Nicholas II, and this title is the sixth in a row. This monarch also retained the title “Prince of Bulgaria” assigned by Ivan III. But Nicholas II was not the Khan of Khiva and the Emir of Bukhara - these states had the status of protectorates of the Russian Empire, and until 1920 their own dynasties ruled there.

Kazan people


But let's return to the banks of the Volga. Kazan "Tatars" often called themselves simply Muslims. By the way, this is exactly what Bosniaks who professed Islam were officially called Muslims in socialist Yugoslavia.

Another self-name of the subjects of the Kazan kings is “kazanly”, that is, Kazan people. By the way, we can also recall the expression “orphan of Kazan”, which, according to the most reliable version (put forward by V. Dahl), appeared after the capture of Kazan by Ivan the Terrible - this is how noble people of the khanate called themselves in petitions to this king. Their imaginary “poverty” was ironically played out: “orphan of Kazan” - “orphan of Kazan”, that is, feigned. And then these two expressions were combined - and precisely in the first version. Let us clarify that the word “orphan” at that time was a derivative of “sir” and meant “poor, wretched person”, not necessarily lonely or left without parental care. Until the 15th century, it was often used as a self-name for Russian peasants.

It should be noted that in Rus' they knew very well that in Kazan, Astrakhan, Sarai, Crimea or Siberia there live different peoples who even speak different languages ​​and only understand each other with difficulty. The Kazan people, for example, spoke the Turkic language of the Altai family of the Kipchak subgroup - “closely related” are the Kumyk, Balkar, Kazakh, Bashkir, and Kyrgyz languages.

And the Krymchaks spoke the language of the Oguz subgroup, which is closer to Turkish, Gagauz, Turkmen, Azerbaijani and Salar. And there were also “Nogai Tatars” (Nogais), “Mountain Tatars” (Karachais and Balkars), “Yenisei Tatars” (Khakas), “Lipka Tatars” (Polish-Lithuanian, Belarusian), “Dobrudzhan Tatars” and so on. Modern Azerbaijanis were known as "Caucasian Tatars", and Marietta Shahinyan used this "definition" even in 1935 - in the fantasy revolutionary novel "Mess-Mend".

In general, we can safely say that the word “Tatars” in the Russian lands in those days was actually synonymous with Muslims: Kazan Muslims, Crimean Muslims, and so on.

If we talk specifically about the Kazan “Tatars”, then we remember that, according to Karamzin, people of 5 tribes originally lived in the Kazan kingdom. After the annexation of Kazan to the Russian state, numerous settlers from Russian regions appeared.

In the Russian Empire, little attention was paid to nationality; belonging to a religious denomination was much more important. The concepts “Orthodox” and “Russian” were practically synonymous: having been baptized according to the Orthodox rite, Muslims, Catholics, Protestants or Jews immediately became Russian.

The Tatar Murza Solohmir, having converted to Orthodoxy, instantly turned into the Ryazan boyar Ivan Miroslavich, married the sister of the famous Prince Oleg Ivanovich, Anastasia, and became the founder of the noble families of the Apraksins, Rataevs, Kryukovs, Shishkins, Chebotarevs and some others.

The Astrakhan prince Murtaza-Ali, having been baptized, became the Moscow boyar Mikhail Kaibulovich, married Agafya Ivanovna Sheremeteva (great-granddaughter of the Khan of the Great Horde Akhmat), and in 1572 headed the Boyar Duma.

Do you remember the answer of Nicholas I to de Custine?

“This one of mine is a Pole, this one is German. There are two generals standing there - they are Georgians. This courtier is a Tatar, this is a Finn, and there is a baptized Jew... all together they are Russians.”

After the conquest of the Kazan kingdom by Ivan the Terrible, all Muslims began to be called “Tatars”, and all Orthodox Christians were called “Russians”. This division, not on a national basis, but on a religious principle, still exists, although it is almost impossible to distinguish a modern Kazan Tatar from a Kazan Russian.

A similar situation, by the way, was in the Balkans, where Orthodox Christians became Serbs and Montenegrins, Catholics became Croats, Muslims became Bosniaks. And children from mixed marriages during Tito’s reign called themselves Yugoslavs.

But let's return to the Kazan Tatars.

Currently, when studying their genotype, it turned out that they have much in common with the inhabitants of Eastern Europe and the Mediterranean. As for the “contribution” of immigrants from Central Asia to the ethnogenesis of the population of this republic, in different regions it ranges from 1% to 6%.

It is curious that after the revolution, the “Council of Volga Bulgarian Muslims”, which had many supporters and followers of Bakhautdin Vaisov (members of the Firkai Nadzhia party), asked Moscow to name the new autonomy the Bulgarian Soviet Republic - and Lenin liked this name.

But the leaders of local communists insisted on the name Tatar-Bashkir Autonomous Republic - and Stalin supported them: he did not want too large a national entity to appear within the RSFSR. His plan worked: the Bashkirs did not want to be on the sidelines after the Tatars and demanded the creation of their own republic. Lenin and his supporters found themselves in the minority and submitted to party discipline.

As a result, on May 27, 1920, a resolution (decree) was issued by the Council of People's Commissars and the All-Russian Central Executive Committee on the formation of the Autonomous Tatar Socialist Soviet Republic, which became the Tatar Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic on December 5, 1963. Since February 7, 1992, it has been called the Republic of Tatarstan. Although, of course, it would be correct to call this republic Kazan, or Volga-Bulgarian.
31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    April 17 2024 05: 40
    The article would be complete and meaningful if the Author paid attention to the Bulgars. Who are they, where did they come from and what kind of state is this, Volga Bulgaria
    1. VLR
      +10
      April 17 2024 06: 31
      This is a continuation of three articles about the western campaign of the tumens Subedei and Jebe. If we talk about the emergence of the Volga Bulgaria state, we would have to go back too far. Although the topic is, of course, interesting, perhaps I’ll write about it later - before the first meeting of the Volga Bulgars with the Mongols and the “Battle of Ram”.
      1. +3
        April 17 2024 08: 25
        If we talk about the emergence of the Volga Bulgaria state, we would have to go back too far
        One paragraph would be enough for a general idea.
        1. +2
          April 17 2024 14: 53
          So, from the surviving written sources of the Bulgars, for example, stone tombstones, it is clear that the Bulgars spoke the early Chuvash language, but the Polovtsian language is just more of a Tatar-Bashkir language. Speakers of the modern Chuvash language perfectly understand inscriptions in Bulgarian.
          Native speakers of the Tatar-Bashkir language perfectly understand written sources in the Polovtsian language.
          So, stop calling the Kazan Tatars Bulgars, that’s not true.
          1. VLR
            +4
            April 17 2024 15: 41
            So it is said that on the territory of the Kazan kingdom or khanate lived representatives of 5 indigenous ethnic groups, one of which was the Chuvash. But the rulers and aristocrats were newcomers, and therefore their language - the Turkic of the Altai family of the Kipchak subgroup - became official. And modern “Kazan Tatars” are a fusion of local tribes and a number of colonists. They have nothing to do with other “Tatars,” for example, the Crimean ones (who were formed on a different ethnic basis).
            1. +3
              April 18 2024 06: 51
              If we return to the topic, then it would be good if the Author did not say that Lame Timur (Tamerlane) ruined Kazan, the attitude of the Volga-Ural population, which was expressed in epics and other sources, as well as the modern attitude of these peoples - Lame Timur is a hero who destroyed the power of the Mongols and liberated these peoples from the oppression of the Horde. It is very strange why this is not reflected in modern historians, but it was Timur’s defeat of Tokhtamysh that actually led to the liberation of Rus' from the Yoke. Khromets literally razed the main cities of the Horde from the face of the earth. Therefore, in the memory of the Volga peoples, Timur is still a positive hero.
          2. +4
            April 17 2024 16: 26
            Quote: Civil
            from written sources of the Bulgars, for example stone tombstones, it is clear that the Bulgars spoke the early Chuvash language

            These are the modern Chuvash who speak a language that has Bulgarian, or rather, Khazar roots...

            Quote: Civil
            From this, it’s enough to call the Kazan Tatars Bulgars, it’s not true

            If you say that to the Kazan Tatars, they will beat you! Kazan Tatars are the real heirs of the Bulgars...
            1. ANB
              +2
              April 17 2024 23: 37
              . If you say that to the Kazan Tatars, they will beat you!

              They won't beat you. In Tatarstan there was a lot of controversy in the 90s about who they were, Tatars or Bulgars. The Tatars still won.
              Well, Kazan Tatars are very different from Tatars from other regions.
              1. +3
                April 18 2024 08: 56
                Quote: ANB
                In Tatarstan there was a lot of controversy in the 90s about who they were, Tatars or Bulgars. The Tatars still won

                When there were Bulgars, there were no Tatars. Now there are Tatars - no Bulgars. Modern Kazan Tatars are the direct heirs of the Volga Bulgaria...
              2. VLR
                +4
                April 18 2024 08: 59
                In Tatarstan there was a lot of controversy in the 90s about who they were, Tatars or Bulgars. The Tatars still won.

                This is just natural: the Bulgars lost, and everyone wants to be the descendants of the winners. However, in fact, the Kazan Tatars are the descendants of the peoples conquered by Subedei and Batu.
                The Kazakhs are the same - there the descendants of the conquered tribes, through one, believe that their ancestor was Chingis himself - not even some Temnik or Murza. However, the small Mongols were at the very top of the “food chain”, and the ancestors of the Kazakhs were their servants and grooms.
    2. +5
      April 17 2024 09: 33
      It was founded by one of the sons of Kan (not Khan) Kubrat, Kan Kotrag. The rest came to the Eastern Roman Empire (two sons independently of each other, Asparukh and Kuber), one in Italy (Altsek) and one remained in the site of Old Great Bulgaria (Batbayan).
      1. +4
        April 17 2024 11: 06
        It was founded by one of his sons
        I know a lot about her. But there are readers who don't know this. They either won’t understand anything or will go to other sites for information.
    3. 0
      April 20 2024 09: 01
      And why don’t Tatars like Bashkirs....
    4. +2
      April 26 2024 10: 25
      Michel, I’ll be brief. There was Great Bulgaria. Under the onslaught of the Khazars, one clan went to the Volga, founding Volga Bulgaria. The second (Khan Asparukh) went to present-day Bulgaria, where, in alliance with the local Slavs, he formed the Bulgarian Khanate. It seems (inaccurate) there was a third clan that covered the retreat of his fellow tribesmen. And part of which went to North Macedonia. So the Chuvash, Kazan Tatars, Bulgarians, perhaps Balkars, related peoples.
      The author is PLUS.
      1. +1
        April 26 2024 11: 40
        So Chuvash, Kazan Tatars, Bulgarians, perhaps Balkars, related peoples
        Here you can also add Karachais and, possibly, Kumyks
  2. +10
    April 17 2024 06: 06
    I enjoyed reading it, thank you very much!
    Regards, Kote!
    1. Fat
      +6
      April 17 2024 12: 32
      I will support you. I liked the article. For some reason, he considered the Volga Bulgars to be more the “heirs” of the Polovtsians - the Kipchaks, and the Mongol conquerors were, in his mind, almost completely assimilated by the Kipchaks.
      Something fell into place after reading it - that’s wonderful.
  3. +4
    April 17 2024 06: 53
    I read a report by some church minister about the process of baptism of local peoples. Very interesting, sometimes funny, sometimes sad. But apparently the material was deleted, I can’t find it now.
    1. 0
      April 20 2024 09: 09
      The baptism of the Tatars faced bureaucratic difficulties... priests traveled around the villages, baptized people and issued a document that they were baptized... And they made lists of who was baptized... but upon leaving Tataria, these priests with the lists disappeared.
      As a result, the authorities spat on this baptism and left everything as it was
  4. +6
    April 17 2024 09: 01
    The article is very interesting, a plus for the author. In the Ryazan region, in the east, in the Kadomsky district there is the so-called. Purgasovo settlement. It is believed that Purgas was Erzya, Puresh Moksha. They were at enmity with each other. Puresh joined the Mongols because... constantly fought with Ryazan
  5. +4
    April 17 2024 09: 17
    The “Council of Volga Bulgar Muslims”, which included many supporters and followers of Bakhautdin Vaisov (members of the Firkai Nadzhia party), asked Moscow to name the new autonomy the Bulgar Soviet Republic - and Lenin liked this name.

    He was born on the Volga in Simbirsk, studied at Kazan University - apparently, he knew what kind of Tatars lived in Kazan and the surrounding area.
  6. +4
    April 17 2024 09: 21
    It is almost impossible for a modern Kazan Tatar to differ from a Kazan Russian.

    Last year I was simply amazed by two women - tour guides - about 50 years old, fair-haired, purely Slavic in appearance, in pure Russian they talked about the importance of the revival of Tatar culture and how good it is that only people with perfection are accepted for government positions in Tatarstan who know the Tatar language. That is, in Tatarstan there is direct and unpunished discrimination against the Russian-speaking population - so brazen that it was not even in Ukraine in the post-Soviet decade. What are they thinking about in the Kremlin - are they waiting for the Kazan "Maidan"?
    1. 0
      April 22 2024 16: 25
      Have you forgotten about Chechnya? Or are you afraid to say anything about it? There's a picture in a square, maybe in a cube
  7. 0
    April 17 2024 11: 14
    As a result, in 1234 Ogedei was forced to issue a decree to mobilize forces throughout the empire
    Wow!! And in what form was the decree? Orally or in writing?
    1. +3
      April 17 2024 15: 43
      They shouted loudly, it could be heard from afar, and there their screamers picked up
    2. 0
      April 19 2024 08: 53
      To be honest, I didn’t understand your question. Do you doubt that the children of Genghis Khan issued some decrees in their states and brought them to the attention of their subjects? How did they manage them then?
      1. -4
        April 20 2024 02: 01
        I have no idea. But if you personally are sure that Genghis Khan existed, that he had children and that these children issued decrees, then be so kind as to show a photocopy of at least one decree they issued.
  8. +6
    April 17 2024 12: 23
    Thanks to the author for the series.
    Still, after all the Drevlyans, Krivichi and Vyatichi, Volga Bulgaria, along with Moscow and Novgorod, is the foundation of the future Russian state, and the first experience of tolerant construction, assimilation and involvement at any level of government.
  9. +4
    April 17 2024 13: 08
    This one of mine is a Pole, this one is German. There are two generals standing there - they Georgians. This courtier is a Tatar, this is a Finn, and there is a baptized Jew... all together they are Russians

    I remember reading somewhere that the Georgian Bagration inundated Alexander I with complaints that he - Russian people, there is no life from the “German” Barclay de Tolly. smile
  10. +2
    April 18 2024 00: 35
    Informative and well written article. The author was able to explain the fluidity/flexibility of people's identities during imperial times, where your religion often determined your language and/or ethnicity.
  11. -1
    April 24 2024 17: 36
    Thanks to the author for an informative and interesting article.