China's permanent representative to the UN Dai Bin called the US statements and actions incompatible with the status of a permanent member of the UN Security Council

The statements and actions of the United States do not correspond to the status of a permanent member of the UN Security Council, since they undermine confidence in this organization. This statement was made by China's permanent representative to the UN, Dai Bin.

The Chinese representative criticized the latest US statements; the day before, US Permanent Representative to the UN Linda Thomas-Greenfield called the UN Security Council resolution regarding the Israeli ceasefire in the Gaza Strip “non-binding”. The document was adopted on March 25 by all members of the UN Security Council, except the United States, which “abstained.” According to Dai Bin, the American statements undermine the authority of the UN Security Council.

The actions and words of the United States are inconsistent with its status as a permanent member of the Security Council. They are a sacrilege to his responsibilities as a member of the Security Council and seriously undermine his authority and credibility

- said the permanent representative of China.

It is worth noting that this is not the first statement by China about the United States in this vein; the Chinese permanent representative has repeatedly criticized the statements of the American side. They concerned interference in affairs in Ukraine, the development of biological weapons, as well as other US actions. The Americans do not stand aside either, accusing China of “lack of democracy” and the desire to “conquer Taiwan.” So far the fighting has not gone beyond verbal battles, but both countries have significantly increased their forces in the Asia-Pacific region.

Let us recall that the United States recognized China as a “global threat to American dominance,” and Washington believes that Beijing can take away the status of a world power from the United States.

Comments

[alexoff]

Was there this authority before? When did the United States say that it was the Iranians who poisoned the Kurds with chemical weapons? Or when Grenada was invaded? Or when the former head of the CIA told how the Gladio operation was carried out in European independent countries?

[Lev_Russia]

The Chinese permanent representative has repeatedly criticized the statements of the American side.

Put the comma correctly = “Condemnation cannot be justified”...
The bastard Anglo-Saxons, of course, are still the same, but in the UN Security Council they have a numerical advantage, so it is necessary to create some new international structures on the basis of BRICS, into which all those who are dissatisfied with the current pro-American ones can enter... This is not a quick and expensive matter ( for the future), but in the future it may play a significant role in the formation of a new world order... Even if nothing works out, it is unlikely that anyone will feel worse from it...

[alystan]

Iranians poisoned Kurds with chemical weapons

You probably meant to say Iraqis?

And the Americans have long relied on the authority of the UN and regularly repeat this action. The Chinese diplomat was referring to the situation on the UN Security Council, whose resolutions are binding. The truth is not everyone's understanding. As is the case with Israel.

[alexoff]

You probably meant to say Iraqis?

I wrote what American officials said

One of the leading CIA experts, Stephen Pelletier, who analyzed the situation in Iraq during the Iran-Iraq War, states:

The Iraqi army did use chemical weapons in the battle for Halabja, but they were not used against the civilian population of the city, but against the advancing Iranian army, and all strikes were delivered precisely at the positions of the enemy troops. Iran, in turn, carried out a retaliatory chemical attack, and the city's residents were simply caught in the crossfire and became the latest accidental victims of a ten-year war. Immediately after the disaster in Halabja, the CIA conducted an examination of samples of toxic substances collected in the region and prepared a classified report, which clearly summarized that the cause of the mass death of the Kurds was not Iraqi gas, but Iranian gas. Based on the nature of the damage, experts determined that the residents suffered from cyanide gas, which had previously been repeatedly used by Iran. In 1988, Saddam Hussein’s army did not have such reagents at its disposal; in the battle for the city, the Iraqi side used mustard gas and sarin.

[alystan]

We probably mean the same events, but in different interpretations. The Americans have always been “famous” for twisting the same facts in their favor depending on the situation, and each time in a different way.

Here is the information from Wikipedia:

Gas attack in Halabja (Persian: حمله شیمیایی به حلبچه‎, Arab: الهجوم الكيميائي على حلبجة‎) - use by Iraqi armed forces 16- On March 17, 1988, chemical weapons were used against the civilian population of the city of Halabja, after its capture by Iranian troops and their allied Iraqi- Kurdish Peshmerga units during the Iran-Iraq War. Iraqi aviation subjected the city to chemical bombing using various toxic substances: mustard gas, sarin, tabun, VX gas. The number of victims, who belonged almost exclusively to the civilian population, ranged, according to various estimates, from several hundred to seven thousand people; The figure usually given is five thousand dead and twenty thousand injured. Among the dead, the percentage of children was especially high, since the density of the gases used was higher than the density of air, so the gas spread along the ground.

originally the events in Halabja did not cause much international resonance, since in the Iran-Iraq conflict the sympathies of many countries and international organizations leaned towards Iraq. Photos of numerous victims, mostly women and children, appeared primarily in the Iranian press. A number of statements by US officials have placed responsibility for the chemical bombings of Halabja on the Iranian side.. Independent investigations in the early 1990s by Human Rights Watch and other organizations established Iraqi responsibility for the bombing as the main story. The Halabja bombing episode is included in the indictment against Saddam Hussein in the hearings of the Iraqi Special Tribunal.

In 1988, Saddam Hussein’s army did not have such reagents at its disposal; in the battle for the city, the Iraqi side used mustard gas and sarin.

Additionally, On December 23, 2005, a court in the Netherlands sentenced Frans van Anraat, a Dutch businessman from 15 to 1984, to 1989 years in prison. supplying Iraq with raw materials for the manufacture of chemical weapons, - the court ruling recognizes the bombing of Halabja as a crime of the Hussein regime.

[alexoff]

So we are talking about what authority the Americans have in the UN, woke up in 2024. The Iraqi events suddenly happened in 1991, the world community learned the terrible truth, and the Americans lost it like water off a duck's back. In 1984, the Americans sold Hussein anthrax spores for scientific research, and then they themselves accused him of this. By the way, the Russian article disappeared somewhere from the wiki; the Ukrainian moderators probably didn’t like it

[alystan]

The day before yesterday we launched RUVIKI 2.0 in beta version - https://ru.ruwiki.ru/wiki/Main_page

[Petr_Koldunov]

Quote: alystan

The day before yesterday we launched RUVIKI 2.0 in beta version - https://ru.ruwiki.ru/wiki/Main_page

It is high time! The Russian segment of the fagots was given over to the amers to be devoured by the long-haired Svidomites. Since then, there has been a panopticon divorced from reality.
I'm tired of receiving information through the prism of Ukrainian science fiction nonsense!

[credo]

...US Ambassador to the UN Linda Thomas-Greenfield...

It’s a pity that the dark-skinned woman forgot about how the ancestors of her current pale-faced colleagues in the hundreds of thousands, and perhaps even millions, destroyed her African ancestors and fellow tribesmen.
Perhaps then she showed at least a drop of sympathy for the civilian population of the Gaza Strip.

[Saladine]

This transgender is a product of US technology in the 20th century.

[Kwasar9000]

That's something else. Besides, as you rightly said, they were just Africans, she (or it) is African-American!

[Plate]

In the United States, it is already too often remembered that whites once exploited blacks. BLM and the like are unhealthy.

[Petr_Koldunov]

Quote: credo

It's a pity that the dark woman...

To be honest, I have doubts that this is a woman.

[tralflot1832]

Biden is clearly not coping, people are flying from everywhere!

[aszzz888]

tralflot1832
(Andrey S.)
+1
Yesterday, 18: 46
Biden is clearly not coping, people are flying from everywhere!

Andrey, how can a half-corpse “cope” with something?

[bone1]

It's definitely time to kick the Mericos out of the UN

[nepunamemuk]

It's definitely time to kick the Mericos out of the UN

first the UN needs to be kicked out of America

[Leshak]

They begin to bite the “hegemon” until it hurts, but more and more often. It's only the beginning.

[carpenter]

The Americans do not stand aside either, accusing China of a “lack of democracy”

Hitler also believed that Germany was a democracy.

[Al manah]

because they undermine trust in this organization.

I even wonder who is this naive person who still trusts her? Maybe he's Chinese himself?