Armenia is big - there’s enough for everyone: Pashinyan is on the verge of disaster

58
Armenia is big - there’s enough for everyone: Pashinyan is on the verge of disaster


No agreement on cards


The Zangezur corridor is now the most explosive section of the Caucasus. Azerbaijan needs control over a 40-kilometer section of Armenian territory to provide basic supplies to its exclave, the Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic. Almost half a million Azerbaijanis live in the region, sandwiched between the not-so-friendly Armenia and Iran. And only a thin isthmus connects the people of Nakhichevan with Turkey.



Armenia, we must pay tribute, is holding up well and does not allow, under any pretext, the resumption of land communication along the Zangezur corridor, which was interrupted in the early 90s. In Soviet times, Azerbaijan was connected through Armenia by a railway and a highway.

Nikol Pashinyan is irritated by the very wording of the Zangezur corridor; it seems to him that the sovereignty of Armenia is being oppressed here. Last summer, his opponent Ilham Aliyev said that “the corridor will definitely be open, whether Armenia wants it or not.” This automatically puts the two countries on the brink of war, and not for the unrecognized Nagorno-Karabakh, but for the Armenian territory, which is fully formalized at the international level.

There is a feeling that Azerbaijan would have long ago entered Armenia under some kind of “humanitarian flag” and cut a corridor to Nakhichevan. Russia's opinion is also constrained by the military base in Gyumri. Armenia's membership in the CSTO, which has not yet been interrupted, also provides a certain guarantee of inviolability for Yerevan.

One can also understand Aliyev - after all, he forcefully resolved the Nagorno-Karabakh problem, which has been around for decades. After a military victory, the leaders of countries rarely stop - appetites grow during the meal, as is known. And Baku had not finished his meal yet.


Considering the disparate military potentials of Armenia and Azerbaijan, Pashinyan is ready to make concessions. We are talking about some sections of the border.

The situation after numerous wars between Yerevan and Baku has become very difficult. And Nagorno-Karabakh, although it was the largest problem, is far from the only one.

The Armenian enclave of Artsvashen, which is not under the control of Yerevan, is located on the territory of Azerbaijan. Baku insists on the return of 31 settlements on the border at once. According to the leadership of the republic, the Azerbaijani army occupied the territories during the last wars over Karabakh. Azerbaijan does not want to hear anything about this and, in turn, demands that the villages of Karki, Barkhudarly, Sofulu, Upper Askipara and several other settlements be returned to its jurisdiction. Armenia occupied these territories in the early 90s.

It is worth noting that none of the mentioned villages belong to the Zangezur corridor - all are disputed territories in the north of Armenia. And only lonely Kyarks were located near the Nakhichevan Autonomous Republic.

Until a certain point, Nikol Pashinyan intended to resolve the issue radically and give Azerbaijan several points in the Tavush region in the north. Officially, this procedure is covered up as an attempt to conclude a peace treaty with Baku, which, as it seems to the Armenian leadership, will help preserve sovereignty.

Without demarcation and delimitation of the border, Aliyev does not agree to sign any agreement. After the victory in Nagorno-Karabakh, this very clarification of the border will take place on Baku’s terms. Otherwise it can not be.

Until a certain point, Pashinyan understood this and, at a meeting in one of the disputed villages, announced the “transition to the practical stage” of the border demarcation process. In response to fair objections from local residents, the Prime Minister said:

“...But this means that at the end of the week there will be war. And I know what will happen at the end of this war. Then, when we meet somewhere on Republic Square, you will say: “Okay, we are simple villagers, we had no information, but you knew everything.”

Change of position and anticipation of war


Pashinyan’s defeatist mood occurred after a conversation with Stoltenberg, who called for a peace treaty to be formalized as soon as possible. On the sidelines of a tour of the Caucasus, he probably promised Pashinyan some goodies for territorial concessions to Azerbaijan.

The Armenian leader seemed to follow NATO’s lead and raised his foot over the abyss, but stopped in time. “What is ours will remain ours, what is theirs will remain theirs,” he unexpectedly declared after another demand to transfer the disputed villages to Azerbaijan. This happened just a couple of days after he threatened the villagers on the border with a new war.

Only Pashinyan is capable of such military-political somersaults. He instantly reacted to the new reality and began to gather his army to the border with Azerbaijan. And then he accused Baku of inciting war.


There are several processes at work at once, and all of them, one way or another, can provoke a new conflict. Now for the internationally recognized territory of Armenia.

Yerevan began to intensively arm itself, primarily in France. Since the summer of 2023, the army has already received several Bastion light armored cars, and air defense systems and GM200 radars are next. The latter, allegedly, will be able to control territory within a radius of 200 kilometers or more.

There is talk about supplies of small arms weapons from France and about training the military according to NATO standards. Armenia is also establishing ties with India, primarily being interested in the local military-industrial complex. The dreams of the Armenian establishment include the creation of an axis of Delhi - Yerevan - Paris as opposed to Baku - Ankara - Islamabad.

However, the interest of the Indians and French in this scheme is very doubtful. This is especially true for India, which has always been famous for its exceptional pragmatism in foreign policy and concentration on its own interests.

Why does Delhi need distant Armenia if there are plenty of problems nearby?

The second process, which Pashinyan carefully pedals, is related to the ongoing alienation from Russia. So far there is no talk of withdrawing the base from Gyumri, but the current leader of Armenia has every chance to bring the matter to this point.

The idea is that without destroying ties with the Kremlin, Pashinyan will not be accepted in the coveted high circles of Europe. First, break up with Russia, and then we will talk about your future - the rhetoric of the West is simple and clear.

Pashinyan is methodically approaching this. He ratified the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, recalled his representative to the CSTO and blocked MIR cards in Armenia.

But will Pashinyan’s government have a future?

Azerbaijan will not calmly look at the growing military power of Armenia, if this growth takes place at all. Considering the general unsettled state of world politics, he may start another mess on the Armenian border. That over time it will go into a hot phase, and then Mr. Pashinyan will not get away with four villages.
58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    April 4 2024 05: 15
    Quote: Yevgeny Fedorov
    Armenia's membership in the CSTO has not yet been interrupted
    It's frozen. Now is the time for Aliyev to resolve the issue with the Zangezur corridor and illegal Armenian villages
    1. +2
      April 8 2024 18: 42
      Armenia, we must pay tribute, is holding up well and does not allow, under any pretext, the resumption of land communication along the Zangezur corridor

      What a fool.
      It would be better to hold on to Nagorno-Karabakh like that.
      And Azerbaijan really needs this corridor. How Russia needs the Suwalki corridor. And it would be better for him to come to an agreement with Azerbaijan peacefully. Because sooner or later we will have to come to an agreement, the only question is whether Armenia will get goodies for this or will its last teeth be knocked out.
      1. +2
        April 8 2024 19: 12
        Iran is against border changes. And the collaborators and traitors in power in Yerevan are not resolving this issue. Iran will send troops into Armenia and will fight with both Turkey and Azerbaijan, if necessary. The powers that be in Iran are talking about this directly. Aliyev has already been personally targeted by a sniper from Iranian territory, and then the photos have been leaked to the Internet.

        Any strengthening of the anti-Iranian Ankara-Baku tandem, as well as the appearance of American or any other NATO bases in Armenia, is unacceptable for Tehran, and they made it clear that they will defend their interests, including through military means.

        If the Armenian people want Armenia to be a war zone for Iran or Russia, then they can still tolerate their leadership.
        1. 0
          April 8 2024 19: 34
          What does this have to do with changing borders?
          The Suwałki corridor did not change the Baltic border, it only allowed Russians to travel along it.
          Armenia can also simplify the travel of Azerbaijanis through the territory of Armenia. It’s only 40 km, they can even run their own buses for the “horseless”.
          And cut travel coupons.
          1. +1
            April 9 2024 20: 59
            Because we need to study the history of the issue. The corridor that Baku wants provides for uncontrolled, customs-free transportation of people and goods. Those. in fact, a piece of Armenian territory is called a corridor there. Which, as I said, Iran is categorically against. And not just against it, but ready to send in troops.
            1. 0
              April 10 2024 18: 14
              That's why diplomats are needed, to create an agreement acceptable to everyone.
              What Azerbaijan wants and what it has now are two extremes. Either a complete lack of control or a complete ban.
              And the diplomatic solution is in the middle. That is, the checkpoint on the border operates, and in the event of aggravation of relations, Azerbaijan can either create queues for several days or close the checkpoint altogether. But the main thing is that the passage still works.
              To please Iran, a ban on the passage of military cargo can be stipulated.
              There is still a way to that enclave through Turkey, so it is impossible to completely isolate it. And this will simply reduce tension. And Armenia will receive additional income.
              1. 0
                April 11 2024 09: 25
                I repeat, this is the only question there. Are you living in an imaginary world? Even now, goods and cargo reach Nakhichevan without problems through the territory of Iran. With the procedures provided for by the legislation of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

                What, ..., income? There genocide happened and is happening. What do you think people were running from? What did the peacekeepers see there that they were killed? We are talking about geopolitics and national security. Russia first of all. If you do not understand that the story with the “corridor”, the non-condemnation of the terrorist attack in Crocus by the Armenian delegation to the CSTO, the “suspension” of membership in the CSTO, the invitation of the French and British military to Armenia and the withdrawal of the Russian base from Armenia are not connected, then you are deeply mistaken.
  2. +12
    April 4 2024 05: 25
    no catastrophe threatens this Pashinyan. With the support of the Armenians of Armenia, he surrendered Nagorno-Karabakh, which is why the disaster did not happen. The Armenians did not revolt and did not demolish Pashinyan, which means the Armenians surrendered Nagorno-Karabakh. Moreover, if anyone there opens their mouth about the inequality of the surrender of Karabakh and the sycophancy of America, France and the EU, then in Armenia they will immediately be called Putin’s agents, which is a trend in all former republics of the USSR. Pashinyan and the Armenians will give up another part of Armenia, but the Armenians of Armenia must get to the guipure trousels of Europe!
  3. +5
    April 4 2024 05: 32
    blocked MIR cards in Armenia
    The WORLD cards were blocked by Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, and here you have the CIS and the EAEU..
    1. +2
      April 6 2024 12: 41
      Well, yes, this is a big plus for Russia. Unless, of course, you chew snot! The Central Bank of Russia must declare that all mutual settlements with these countries are carried out only and exclusively on the basis of the Mir system. All! And then sit and wait to see who will be carried out faster!
  4. +9
    April 4 2024 05: 38
    It’s interesting - if the Armenians lose statehood, will they claim the honorary title of the indigenous people of Russia?
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +7
      April 4 2024 10: 38
      Quote: antiaircrafter
      It’s interesting - if the Armenians lose statehood, will they claim the honorary title of the indigenous people of Russia?
      What kind of “complicated-simple” question did you ask? winked
      If we consider it from the point of view of the presence of Gypsies in Russia, then they do not have their own administrative-territorial entity, but at the same time, there are Gypsies as a people. And they are indigenous by right of birth in Russia, that is, Russians. Yes
      1. +4
        April 4 2024 13: 42
        Siberia is the homeland of the gypsies. drinks
        1. 0
          April 6 2024 13: 08
          He was a good leader, there should be more like him!..
  5. +5
    April 4 2024 06: 14
    It seems to me that in the end, no matter what happens, no matter what trouble they mess up, they will still blame us...
  6. +8
    April 4 2024 06: 38
    The trouble is that some Armenians living in this country (and not only) support Pashinyan and believe in a “beautiful future” in an embrace with Europe and the United States. There are all the signs of a post-Maidan Ukraine with its dreams, inflated self-esteem and supposedly being in demand in the West. And the demand was for one thing - to fight with Russia and die for Western interests. The same thing awaits Armenia, which, of course, will not fight, but will break the remaining ties with Russia completely and irrevocably.
  7. 0
    April 4 2024 06: 41
    There are no people in Azerbaijan who are dissatisfied with Aliyev’s policies; if not, they will be there.
  8. -17
    April 4 2024 06: 59
    Russia's opinion is also constrained by the military base in Gyumri. Armenia's membership in the CSTO.
    It’s funny, they have already attacked the territory of Armenia. The CSTO has tactfully remained silent, as has the Russian Federation, and Azerbaijan is restrained only by Iran and the EU mission with the opportunity to obtain sanctions, as in the example of Russia.
    1. +17
      April 4 2024 09: 48
      They did not attack the territory of Armenia, but the territory of Nagorno-Karabakh, which Armenia itself did not recognize either as its territory or as an independent state. That is, Armenia’s position was: we ourselves do not recognize Karabakh, but Russia and the CSTO must fight for it...
      1. -8
        April 5 2024 02: 43
        I wonder if I wrote something about Karabakh? Here I initially spoke about Armenia itself)))
        1. +4
          April 5 2024 16: 09
          And what region in Armenia did they attack, maybe occupied?
  9. +6
    April 4 2024 08: 29
    Someone else is being trained according to NATO standards...
  10. UAT
    +3
    April 4 2024 09: 41
    Sad level of analytics. Almost like the Ukrainian experts - there are a lot of trees (small details), behind which the forest is not visible. In addition, the author has strange problems with the Russian language: “So far there is no talk of withdrawing the base from Gyumri.”
  11. +3
    April 4 2024 11: 59
    we shouldn’t wait, but give Armenia a kick so that it goes away, 87% of the economy is trade with Russia or subsidies from Russia
  12. +8
    April 4 2024 12: 13
    “Armenia, we must pay tribute, is holding up well and does not allow, under any pretext, the resumption of land communication along the Zangezur corridor, which was interrupted in the early 90s.”
    what senselessly provokes Aliyeva... request What is the problem with discussing the conditions for using roads, charging for it... And it looks like Germany-Poland in 1939... hi
  13. +1
    April 4 2024 21: 19
    Without demarcation and delimitation of the border, Aliyev does not agree to sign any agreement. After the victory in Nagorno-Karabakh, this very clarification of the border will take place on Baku’s terms. Otherwise it can not be.
    The demarcation and delimitation of borders on the ground is carried out not on the terms of Baku, but on the terms of Vladimir Vladimirovich, who proposed to both parties to demarcate and delimitate the border between countries on the basis of topographic maps of the General Staff of the Soviet Army and even the Red Army. Azerbaijan and Armenia agreed at the beginning of 2021. But then Armenia gave back. Apparently, Pashinyan was familiarized with these maps. But... where will he go from the submarine?
  14. +3
    April 4 2024 23: 28
    Well, let's say there is always some kind of future. It can be dark, not very dark, not very light and downright light. In order not to distinguish this frank difference, you need to be absolutely colorblind, which the current “father of Armenia” seems to be. Still, it’s interesting how “Great Armenia” is going to pay for modern weapons? Is it perhaps its vaunted Dvin or Yerevan, which it exports more than it produces? tongue
  15. +3
    April 4 2024 23: 30
    Quote: Yamans
    The CSTO remained tactfully silent, as did the Russian Federation
    You see, that's the problem - you don't want to look at the root of the problem. And the root of the problem is that the war between Armenia and Azerbaijan has been going on since 1992. And it was in 1992 that newly independent Armenia, which, bypassing the UN Charter and without the sanction of the UN Security Council, sent its troops into the territory of Azerbaijan, which had also just gained independence, was recognized aggressor. The UN Security Council, by the way, admitted, and this is not bullshit.
    We, Russia, by the way, voted in the UN Security Council to recognize Armenia as an aggressor. Without our consent, as a permanent member of the UN Security Council with the right of veto, the UN Security Council could not recognize Armenia as an aggressor towards Azerbaijan.
    Meanwhile, in our own country, we began to create a Collective Security Treaty. Among the first signatories of which suddenly turned out to be the aggressor in the person of Armenia. Nonsense!!! But then Azerbaijan made its move, which on September 24, 1993 also signed the Collective Security Treaty.
    Belarus was the last to join the Treaty on December 31, 1993.
    The Collective Security Treaty came into force on April 20, 1994. And on November 1, 1995, the Collective Security Treaty was registered with the UN Secretariat.
    So, the Collective Security Treaty came into force on April 20, 1994. And it consisted of two members, between whom there was a war. Moreover, Armenia occupied almost 20% of the territory of Azerbaijan. It would seem that everything is clear - here is the aggressor (Armenia), here is the victim of aggression (Azerbaijan), give the Council of the Collective Security Treaty, solve the problem, force the aggressor (Armenia) to withdraw its troops from the territory of the victim of aggression (Azerbaijan).
    But, as the cat Matroskin said... no, the dog Sharik - “Screw you.” The Council of Member Countries of the Collective Security Treaty has shown complete impotence in this matter. Neither in 1994, nor in 1995, nor in 1996, nor in 1997, nor in 1998, nor in the first quarter of 1999, the Council of member countries of the Collective Security Treaty did anything to force the aggressor to withdraw its troops from territory of the victim of aggression. Therefore, it is absolutely clear that Azerbaijan, discouraged by such impotence of the Collective Security Treaty and our position, at the end of April 1999 did not renew its membership in the Collective Security Treaty for the next five years.
    But because Azerbaijan ceased to be a member of the Collective Security Treaty, nothing fundamentally changed for Armenia. Armenia, as it was a generally recognized aggressor towards Azerbaijan, remains an aggressor. The war started by Armenia in 1992 has also not gone away. Yes, after the signing of the 1994 Agreement on a Ceasefire and Military Actions from 00:01 on May 12, 1994, this war reduced its scale and intensity. But the war itself has not gone away. After all, after the signing of the Agreement on a ceasefire and hostilities, not only the Peace Treaty was not signed, but the Armistice Agreement was not even signed.
    So, why would you decide that the CSTO as a whole and we, Russia, in particular, should help the aggressor in 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024? After all, there is still no Peace Treaty between Armenia and Azerbaijan.
    1. -8
      April 5 2024 02: 54
      Again about Karabakh, did I say something about Karabakh? I say that in 2021 and 2022 Armenia was attacked and captured, 200 km of territory were shelled by Armenian cities with artillery, etc. Armenia turned to the CSTO and the Russian Federation, but in response - silence))
      1. +4
        April 5 2024 09: 55
        Quote: Yamans
        Again about Karabakh, did I say something about Karabakh?
        Did I say something about Karabakh? I said that since 1992 there has been a state of war between Armenia and Azerbaijan. In which Armenia is the aggressor. And, by the way, we, Russia, also recognized that in this war between Armenia and Azerbaijan, it is Armenia that is the aggressor.
        In 2021 and 2022, the war simply returned to the territory of the aggressor.
        Why should we, Russia, and the CSTO as a whole, in 2021 and 2022? would you help the aggressor?
        Maybe you will begin to be indignant at the fact that in 1944 and 1945. The Red Army "invaded" the territory of the Third Reich? But we not only “invaded”, but even took Berlin
        And about Pashinyan’s appeals. Yes, Pashinyan said publicly several times that he had instructed the Government to prepare an appeal to the CSTO. But the materials of the CSTO itself do not say anything about the fact that an official written appeal from Armenia was received from Armenia to the CSTO Secretariat.
        Apparently, Pashinyan still understood that his appeal to the CSTO would not only be rejected, but he would also be publicly flogged. And all of Armenia in his person too. Therefore, Pashinyan only said that “I gave instructions to contact the CSTO,” but in reality the matter never came to an official appeal.
        1. -4
          April 5 2024 10: 34
          The government has already appealed to Russia, the CSTO and the UN Security Council in connection with Azerbaijan’s encroachment on the sovereign territory of the country,” said representatives of the Cabinet of Ministers.
          The operational group of the Joint Headquarters of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) arrived in Yerevan amid an aggravated situation on the Armenian-Azerbaijani border, Armenian Defense Minister Suren Papikyan said on September 15.

          “Tonight, the operational group of the CSTO Joint Headquarters arrived in Armenia to carry out a monitoring mission on the border of Armenia and Azerbaijan in accordance with the decision adopted by the Collective Security Council of the CSTO,” Papikyan wrote on social networks.
          Earlier it became known that the CSTO mission was sent to Armenia in order to analyze the situation on the spot and understand the causes of the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan and find ways to resolve it.

          On September 15, Sidorov announced that the CSTO does not intend to send a military contingent to Armenia. He noted that the heads of state of the organization agreed to solve the problem through political and diplomatic methods.

          The day before, Armenia asked for military assistance from the CSTO to restore the territorial integrity of the country. According to the Prime Minister of the Republic Nikol Pashinyan, the Azerbaijani Armed Forces have occupied 13 square meters since September 100. km of territory of Armenia.
          1. -4
            April 5 2024 10: 35
            Well, then why be surprised that Armenia is leaving for the EU and the USA if all the alliances with the Russian Federation and the CSTO were fakes?
            1. +4
              April 5 2024 11: 07
              Quote: Yamans
              Well, then why be surprised?
              So, is anyone surprised? I personally am not at all surprised.
              Quote: Yamans
              Armenia goes to the EU and the USA if all the alliances with the Russian Federation and the CSTO were fakes?
              Namely, that on the part of Armenia these unions were fakes. Moreover, carried out at the instigation of the United States. Now that Armenia has realized that it will not receive more than it received from Russia in almost 30 years, from the very beginning of its independence - Armenia simply stopped masquerading
            2. +1
              April 7 2024 22: 13
              Let him go, flag in hand and fair wind, such allies are worse than enemies, Tribe of Judah
          2. +2
            April 5 2024 11: 23
            On September 13, 2022, Armenia simply exercised its rights as the chairing country of the CSTO Council and held an extraordinary session of the Collective Security Council via videoconference.

            13 September 2022 years on the initiative of the Republic of Armenia, which chairs the CSTO, an extraordinary session of the Collective Security Council of the Collective Security Treaty Organization was held via videoconference with the agenda “On the aggravation of the situation in certain areas on the border of Armenia and Azerbaijan and providing assistance in resolving the situation.” The meeting was attended by Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan, President of the Republic of Kazakhstan Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, President of the Kyrgyz Republic Sadyr Japarov, President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin, Prime Minister of the Republic of Tajikistan Kohir Rasulzoda, State Secretary of the Security Council of the Republic of Belarus Alexander Volfovich.
            The Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia informed the meeting participants about the situation in certain areas on the border of Armenia and Azerbaijan, where, starting from midnight on September 13, 2022, military clashes took place with the use of heavy weapons and UAVs, resulting in deaths and injuries. The meeting participants expressed condolences to the Armenian side.
            A thorough and frank exchange of views took place. All participants in the CSC meeting expressed concern about the aggravation of the situation in the region and spoke in favor of resolving it exclusively through political and diplomatic means on the basis of generally accepted principles of international law and agreements enshrined in the trilateral statements of the leaders of Azerbaijan, Armenia and Russia dated November 9, 2020. The mediation efforts of the Russian Federation aimed at stabilizing the situation in the region were fully supported.
            President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin brought information to the members of the SKB about additional practical steps by the Russian side aimed at de-escalating the tensions that have arisen.
            During the session of the Collective Security Council, an agreement was reached to send the Collective Security Treaty Organization Mission to the Republic of Armenia, headed by CSTO Secretary General Stanislav Zas, with the participation of the Chief of the CSTO Joint Staff, Colonel-General Anatoly Sidorov and representatives of the CSTO member states to assess the current situation, preparing a detailed report to the heads of state at the next session of the Collective Security Council (which is planned to be held in the fall of this year in Yerevan) on the situation in the region and developing proposals for de-escalating the tensions that have arisen.
            A proposal was also agreed upon to create a Working Group consisting of employees of the Secretariat and military personnel of the Joint Staff to constantly monitor the situation in the area of ​​responsibility of the Collective Security Treaty Organization.

            Well, Pashinyan informed, the participants expressed condolences and concern. We decided to send a monitoring mission.
            Pashinyan did not turn to the CSTO for help, especially military assistance.
      2. +2
        April 5 2024 12: 37
        What kind of bastard are you in the 21st century, cities are shelled with artillery? Where is the video evidence that at least one shell hit a populated area? Understand the tact, grandma Aikanush said it no longer works.
        1. -1
          April 5 2024 17: 51
          Go to Google and write shelling of the city of Jermuk, there are photos and videos there, smart guy
          1. +1
            April 5 2024 20: 41
            While the war is going on, Azerbaijan has every right not only to shell some Jermuk, but also to bomb Yerevan. We, when Germany attacked us, Berlin was bombed laughing
          2. 0
            April 10 2024 19: 27
            Google?! to the trash heap))
            yyy! hospida, how can you live without a brain?!
  16. +3
    April 5 2024 08: 02
    Pashinyan is successfully turning his country into a girl with low social responsibility, and himself into her pimp.
    Is this what Great Armenia dreamed of?!
    1. +2
      April 5 2024 09: 59
      Quote: Sebastian Aristarkhovich Pereira
      Pashinyan is successfully turning his country into a girl with low social responsibility
      With low social responsibility and suddenly a girl ?
      It happens ?
      Although... yes, perhaps you are right, given their morals, it may probably be so. wink
  17. 0
    April 5 2024 09: 42
    There are prophets in their Fatherland.
  18. 0
    April 5 2024 09: 50
    It’s amazing what time we arrived at, enterprising people got a chance to rise, but I think the majority went back 5 years ago. For the leaders of countries, now is the time (as in the Russian Federation in the 90s) when old and accumulated problems began to be solved with weapons.
  19. +2
    April 5 2024 10: 08
    Quote: DrEng02
    what senselessly provokes Aliyeva...
    And also annoys Vladimir Vladimirovich. Well, he doesn’t present Armenia itself in the best possible way. After all, Pashinyan put his signature on the entire Tripartite Statement, including this paragraph
    9. All economic and transport links in the region are unblocked. The Republic of Armenia guarantees the safety of transport links between the western regions of the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Nakhichevan Autonomous Republic in order to organize the unimpeded movement of citizens, vehicles and goods in both directions. Control over transport communication is carried out by the bodies of the Border Guard Service of the FSB of Russia.

    By agreement of the Parties, the construction of new transport communications linking the Nakhichevan Autonomous Republic with the western regions of Azerbaijan will be provided.
  20. 0
    April 5 2024 10: 22
    Pashinyan and the Westerners need all the talk about the corridor. Aliyev will not cut through any corridor. Don't talk crap. Then why aren’t we cutting through the Suwalki corridor?
  21. +1
    April 5 2024 11: 28
    Quote: jetfors_84
    Pashinyan and the Westerners need all the talk about the corridor. Aliyev will not cut through any corridor. Don't talk crap. Then why aren’t we cutting through the Suwalki corridor?
    Are you talking to me ? Why? Did I say that Aliyev will go to cut a corridor?
    And your comparison with the Suwalki corridor is simply incorrect. Pashinyan signed up for (let’s call it that) the Zanzegur corridor. And in advance he placed future transportation in the Zanzegur corridor under the control of the FSB of the Russian Federation.
    Show me at least a remotely similar document on the Suwalki corridor?
    So, who is talking crap - in my opinion it’s clear, isn’t it?
    1. -1
      April 5 2024 17: 47
      This tripartite document can be
      throw it in the trash.
      1. +1
        April 5 2024 20: 36
        Quote: Yamans
        This three-sided document can be thrown in the trash.
        I agree with this. Can. Because the Armenian side put a bolt on it from the very beginning. Especially this point:
        4. The peacekeeping contingent of the Russian Federation is being deployed in parallel with the withdrawal of the Armenian armed forces. The duration of stay of the peacekeeping contingent of the Russian Federation is 5 years with automatic extension for subsequent 5-year periods if neither Party declares 6 months before the expiration of the term its intention to terminate the application of this provision.

        The Armenian armed forces were not withdrawn from the territory of Karabakh. Accordingly, our peacekeepers were never able to take positions on the demarcation line instead of the Armenian troops.
        As a result, almost all of our peacekeepers huddled together at their main base, organized at the former Stepanakert airfield. soldier Which, however, did not stop the Armenians from blaming our peacekeepers and all of Russia for the fact that the peacekeepers “are not fulfilling their functions.” fool fool negative
        1. +2
          April 6 2024 09: 58
          These are flowers; this will not prevent us from writing in Armenian textbooks in the future about the “occupation” of Armenia by Russian troops.
  22. +2
    April 5 2024 11: 32
    There is absolutely no care for Armenia, there is no common border, there is zero benefit, they are evil Pinocchios to themselves. But Kazakhstan will come back to haunt us. And ours don’t care, even though in 404 it started almost the same way.
  23. +1
    April 7 2024 19: 29
    The Karabakh issue and the Nakhichevan problem had to be solved in conjunction. You give us, we give you. And not otherwise.
  24. +2
    April 9 2024 00: 09
    The problem can be solved very simply - stopping the Yerevan nuclear power plant with the removal of fuel, announcing the exact date of the withdrawal of Russian troops from the territory of Armenia, introducing visas for Armenians and closing the internal market for Armenian goods. Exclusion from the CSTO and generally from all local projects. Announcement of a list of requirements, subject to compliance which will consider the issue of resuming relations. And yes, the deprivation of Russian citizenship of all Armenians who have received it, say, since 2010. Rigidity and categoricalness will very quickly solve many issues. And if we also demonstratively say that the issue of territories between Azerbaijan and Armenia does not concern us and we are not against them starting a small war, then Pashinyan will quickly be flushed down the toilet.
    1. 0
      April 9 2024 11: 41
      Our Putin is “not the same.” I'm so tired of this already. How many lives have been lost because of this formulation of any question?
  25. 0
    April 9 2024 11: 40
    The main thing is for Armenians to leave the CSTO and the problem of the corridor will be solved within a year
  26. +1
    April 9 2024 16: 00
    That's it, the process has begun. in two years, all that will remain from Armenia is the Presidential Palace with an underground passage to the French embassy. Everything else will be partly Türkiye, partly Azerbaijan. And Armenians will come to the palace with a French flag, with tears in their eyes thank Pashinyan just for existing, France for the fact that it still has a small piece of the former Armenia around the French embassy and furiously scold Russia for the fact that it blatantly does not went to fight for the Armenians engaged in the most important business in the world - trade.
    1. -1
      April 10 2024 19: 34
      oh, trading your homeland, it’s not a small thing for you to dig through your pockets, shed blood for it, like naive fools Ivans. To trade in your homeland - you need to have a two-thousand-year history... and a small country. bgg
      1. +1
        April 10 2024 20: 02
        Yes, they love to trade in everything, especially friendship. However, in 1915-1916, friendship with the great Turkish people misfired, hmm. As a result, there were few Armenians left, well at least in Eastern Armenia there were some there left, escaped. Now there is no place to escape, but Turkey with Azerbaijan, which is no less “friendly” to Armenia, is. And indeed, soon they will come, sensing the cowardly weakness of the lands they considered theirs since ancient times. They will start with Zangezur (nothing, Iran will wince, but with war it won’t work), they’ll end up in Yerevan (what to do if the coward who sells everything has something to take for free, then you have to take it, the more courage has set in) Look, some of the Armenians will be saved, like then. Again in Russia. And France will help and express concern. And he will send a couple of Great fighters from the French Legion to Yerevan to protect all Armenians. Why not more? But because the rest of the legionnaires will be busy with a much more important matter - increasing the productivity of the black earth lands of Ukraine in the form of humus near the village of Berezino (a real town) Bolgrad district, Odessa region...
  27. 0
    April 12 2024 19: 45
    Deport all Armenians from the Russian Federation and the problem will disappear