State Duma deputy: dozens of weapons, including Saiga, were registered in the arsenal of the private security company guarding Crocus

235
State Duma deputy: dozens of weapons, including Saiga, were registered in the arsenal of the private security company guarding Crocus

State Duma deputy Alexander Khinshtein, who heads the parliamentary committee on information technology and communications, published information about a private company that was involved in the security of the Crocus City Hall near Moscow. We are talking about the private security company Crocus Profi, which, according to the deputy, is armed with dozens of units of various weapons, including, no less, Saiga-20KV service rifles. This is a smooth-bore weapon, the handling of which is given to all security guards of private security companies that use it.

Also, as Alexander Khinshtein reports, the registered arsenal of the said private security company included IZH-71 pistols - the same ones that are very similar in appearance to the Makarov.



If these weapons were in the arsenal of the security organization, then why in this case was it reported that “the guards were not armed”?

Here is a quote from Alexander Khinshtein:

This entire arsenal is stored in the building next door to Crocus (Krasnogorsk, Mezhdunarodnaya, 6), but the guards were on duty without it.

As the deputy writes, in the same building there is a base of the private security company’s rapid response group, which (the group) is obliged to arrive on site in emergency cases. But it didn’t arrive... Alexander Khinshtein writes that this group “did not go to Crocus City Hall” itself.
According to Khinshtein, this private security company “guards” another 16 objects.
235 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +51
    25 March 2024 20: 51
    In the same building there is a fully staffed police department, it seems! Cowards should be tried in a place with terrorists. Local security may not have weapons. But the GBR was obliged to leave, they should also have bulletproof vests with them! The security guards mostly go to earn money; no one is ready to fight terrorists.
    1. +54
      25 March 2024 20: 54
      Even more questions for Agalarov... does the Prosecutor General’s Office still not see any violations?
      The Agalarovs drove the Crocus in an interesting way, a fire service for show, a quick response service also for show and without weapons, the family in Russia was not bad
      1. +44
        25 March 2024 20: 56
        Should private security companies fight terrorists? And what were the police officers doing in the next building, armed with real AKSU assault rifles and real PM pistols? Why did the riot police travel for an hour, even though their headquarters is very close? Is this cowardice, betrayal, or following the orders of those who cover up terrorists?
        1. +14
          25 March 2024 20: 59
          Quote: ramzay21
          Should private security companies fight terrorists? What were the police officers doing in the next building?

          So what is a private security company needed for, to “row” money, they get more money than policemen, why does the country need them?
          1. +26
            25 March 2024 21: 07
            So what is a private security company needed for, to “row” money, they get more money than policemen, why does the country need them?

            The country does not pay private security companies; business owners pay them and they perform the tasks assigned by their owners. They can scare away hooligans, catch thieves, and ensure order in shopping centers, but terrorists must be dealt with by people who are trained and appropriately armed and equipped, that is, at least the police.
            1. +5
              25 March 2024 21: 11
              Quote: ramzay21
              The country does not pay private security companies; business owners pay them and they perform the tasks assigned by their owners.

              I understand that this is a “sharaga” that can work “on ours and on yours.”
              But the state has zero benefit from it, and maybe even worse.
              1. +1
                26 March 2024 08: 08
                Everything is left to private businesses and it seems that this activity is not controlled in any way. In Belarus, even if shopping centers have their own security, there is still an emergency call system for a special unit, security, and police. And they go to apprehend a shoplifter in bulletproof vests and with a machine gun. After the terrorist attack in the Moscow region, riot police with machine guns are now on duty in major shopping centers in Minsk.
              2. 0
                27 March 2024 20: 11
                You understood correctly, which is why the state has limited the activities of private security companies as much as possible, including in the area of ​​using service weapons, special equipment and physical force. So there is no need to complain to them. Questions for the Ministry of Internal Affairs and our heroic National Guard.
            2. -2
              25 March 2024 22: 43
              Members of the private security company wear a “uniform” similar to a military uniform and people count on them as responsible people in authority. What's the output? Prohibit them from wearing uniforms that even remotely resemble military ones. Let them wear a rooster's outfit, and with their service they will achieve his respect. And so these private security companies dishonor the uniform and the entire service class.
              1. +6
                26 March 2024 01: 25
                as responsible people, imbued with power

                they have no power
                And so these private security companies dishonor the uniform and the entire service class.

                they are not servicemen
                1. -2
                  26 March 2024 19: 59
                  Why not? And who is responsible for order? According to you, no one, it turns out. Come in, do what you want, take what you want? So what? I hope you have verified this from your own experience?
              2. +3
                26 March 2024 03: 43
                What kind of outfit could be invented then for the police, who did not fulfill their duties and, by all appearances, did not even intend to fulfill them?
              3. +5
                26 March 2024 07: 38
                Members of the private security company wear a “uniform” similar to a military uniform and people count on them as responsible people in authority.

                The security forces do not and cannot have any power, they cannot use violence, because in ours, as in any other country, the state has a monopoly on the use of violence and ONLY civil servants, that is, the police and the National Guard, have the right to shoot to kill terrorists.
                If we allow this to private security officers who carry out the orders of the owner, we will get hundreds of private armies in an already thoroughly rotten and corrupt state with strong signs of feudalism.
                1. -1
                  26 March 2024 20: 01
                  You are not right .

                  Guards have the right to use firearms in the following cases:
                  1. to repel an attack when his own life is in immediate danger
                  2. to repel a group or armed attack on protected property
                  3. to warn (with a shot in the air) of the intention to use a weapon, as well as to give an alarm signal or call for help.
                  1. 0
                    26 March 2024 20: 58
                    Dear. Yes, you wrote correctly, but in life you have seen what kind of contingent goes to security structures from themselves, the grief of the guards must be defended. The problem with adequate personnel at the moment is very acute in all private security forces in the country, and you are talking about weapons. Who should they give it to? That .
              4. 0
                27 March 2024 20: 14
                For those who are clueless, I repeat, the security guard is limited in the use of weapons and special equipment. The uniform and insignia do not copy the uniform of the armed forces and law enforcement agencies. Stop sputtering if this is not the topic of the question.
                1. 0
                  27 March 2024 23: 53
                  Answer me, stupid, if the private security company in Crocus had firearms, in the situation that happened, they would not have the right to use it? Just yes or no? Did you have the right or didn't you?

                  Well, in terms of form... It’s a form even without insignia. Private security officers do not serve in tutus. If you splash it, it’s okay... you’ll have to wash it off too much. It’s useful.
          2. +5
            25 March 2024 21: 10
            Should private security companies fight terrorists? What were the police officers doing in the next building?
            Yes, I agree... and we need to ask them... it is clear that the security problem is much deeper and it cannot be solved in a month, a year, two.... there are a lot of questions... but all these questions have one thing in common - they are all to power......
            1. +3
              25 March 2024 21: 12
              Quote: Black
              Yes, I agree...and we need to ask them...it’s clear that the security problem is much deeper and cannot be solved in a month, a year, two..

              And you can’t solve it with private security companies, they are useless.
              1. +3
                25 March 2024 21: 14
                You can’t solve it with private security companies, they are useless

                I agree 100%....
              2. -10
                25 March 2024 22: 13
                And you can’t solve it with private security companies, they are useless.

                Well, if they had arranged a shootout with the attackers, there would have been more casualties. This is not special forces, but a private security company.
                1. +10
                  25 March 2024 22: 42
                  I do not agree at all.
                  The terrorists walked and shot at everything that moved, and the people ran away from them and hid. And how could an armed guard do harm in this situation by taking out his IZH? I definitely could have wounded one or two. And there were only four of them. Four!
                  In general, what does it feel like (for the same security guard) to hide behind a chair and see that an armed bandit is heading towards you to kill you. And the only weapon you have is a chair...
                  1. +9
                    25 March 2024 23: 21
                    Quote: BABAY22
                    I do not agree at all.
                    The terrorists walked and shot at everything that moved, and the people ran away from them and hid. And how could an armed guard do harm in this situation by taking out his IZH? I definitely could have wounded one or two. And there were only four of them. Four!
                    In general, what does it feel like (for the same security guard) to hide behind a chair and see that an armed bandit is heading towards you to kill you. And the only weapon you have is a chair...

                    Read the law on private security companies and on weapons in places of public events.
                    It would never occur to anyone to issue a service weapon at a mass event. Especially if you are sane and know the laws.
                    In our country, only law enforcement agencies have the right to violence and the use of weapons.
                    1. +11
                      25 March 2024 23: 44
                      I read it. Federal Law 2487-1 art. 18.
                      "Use of weapons."
                      I have already written below.
                      It turns out that security does not have the right to use weapons to protect people. Only for the protection of yourself and the protected property.
                      How's that?
                      Maybe I didn't read it right?
                      1. 0
                        27 March 2024 20: 25
                        Well, you see. That's exactly what you read. So what questions might there be for the private security company?
                    2. +3
                      26 March 2024 02: 05
                      Quote: SovAr238A
                      In our country, only law enforcement agencies have the right to violence and the use of weapons.

                      They have the right, but for some reason criminals and terrorists take advantage of it.
                2. +4
                  25 March 2024 22: 47
                  Quote: private person
                  Well, if they had arranged a shootout with the attackers, there would have been more casualties. This is not special forces, but a private security company.

                  Why do they need weapons then, if they can’t be trusted to use weapons? Let them then walk around with spray cans!
                  1. +1
                    26 March 2024 07: 34
                    Why do they need weapons then, if they can’t be trusted to use weapons?

                    This is to protect the owner when he goes to negotiations with the same one. In short, for show off.
                    1. 0
                      27 March 2024 20: 20
                      You are completely off topic. Private security guards, in accordance with the law, do not have the right to act as a bodyguard
                  2. 0
                    27 March 2024 20: 18
                    All questions to the state. Those security guards who have a weapons permit (grade 6) are trained and wield weapons no worse than police officers. The problem is that they are very limited by law when it comes to using weapons.
                3. 0
                  26 March 2024 06: 15
                  And who are they? Security..Ah! Definitely a private shop!
              3. +1
                26 March 2024 05: 52
                Short-chop is SECURITY and not protection
                1. +2
                  26 March 2024 06: 16
                  How is Security different from Protection? So that nothing is stolen? Then it’s watchmen
                  1. +2
                    26 March 2024 06: 25
                    Below I wrote that these are watchmen.
                    And there is
                  2. +1
                    26 March 2024 06: 27
                    Below or above I wrote that these are watchmen.
                    And there is
                    True, the watchman also guards, but security is different from security.
                  3. +1
                    26 March 2024 07: 36
                    How is Security different from Protection? So that nothing is stolen? Then it’s watchmen

                    Straight to the point, these are watchmen, they guard the property of their employer.
            2. +1
              26 March 2024 04: 04
              A month, a year, two... 2000 years have passed since 23,5... And you still have a month, a year...
          3. +4
            25 March 2024 23: 18
            Quote: carpenter
            Quote: ramzay21
            Should private security companies fight terrorists? What were the police officers doing in the next building?

            So what is a private security company needed for, to “row” money, they get more money than policemen, why does the country need them?

            Read the law on private security companies first.
            1. -3
              25 March 2024 23: 48
              Quote: SovAr238A
              Read the law on private security companies first.

              I read it, but you read it and think that this is bullshit - “a private paramilitary company”, who is it for? For you or for the moneybags.
              Man, use your brain - it’s “private”, but it’s not for you.
              We have companies, but for the company where I work, but there are 5 of us, and we are just VOkhR, or just watchmen, but without a baton and weapons.
              And "people" with screw cutters and a pistol, that's!!!
              So I was not born and live in Russia, but 200 meters from it.
              1. 0
                27 March 2024 20: 22
                Don't confuse wet with hot. A private security company is not a PMC. There are no legally operating PMCs in our country.
          4. +7
            25 March 2024 23: 34
            carpenter
            So what is a private security company needed for, to “row” money?

            Absolutely true, if you also consider who is at the head of these same private security companies. This is not a secret - former and retired high-ranking employees of the same Russian Guard and the Ministry of Internal Affairs, who are supervised and controlled by the same Russian Guard. It turns out to be a vicious circle. Only ordinary security officers receive little money. If the hard workers of these private security companies are replaced by ordinary watchmen and watchmen, then nothing will change.
            1. +1
              25 March 2024 23: 53
              Quote: frruc
              If the hard workers of these private security companies are replaced by ordinary watchmen and watchmen, then nothing will change.

              Let me put it another way - The private security company has replaced the cops! I am a watchman, or guard, or in English, “officemanager”. Wow that sounds so good. !
              There’s not even a baton.
            2. +2
              26 March 2024 05: 58
              So it’s the watchmen and watchmen who just forced the sign to be changed and have more money for licensing for it
          5. -1
            26 March 2024 00: 29
            You contemptuously call the people who are obliged to protect you “policemen.” Everyone, indiscriminately.
            And then you become indignant that they are in no hurry to save you.
            1. +1
              26 March 2024 05: 59
              But suddenly, the first one will shout: police, police, help
            2. 0
              26 March 2024 06: 35
              This is understandable.

              So where were the police from the station in the same building? And from another branch in the next one?
          6. +1
            26 March 2024 21: 23
            You don't know. Police officers have higher salaries than private security companies. Yes, plus all sorts of benefits, and even an early pension.
        2. +12
          25 March 2024 21: 06
          So that's what I'm talking about. If it is true that in Crocus the entire police department was fully armed, why are they silent about this? How so? It is not yet clear how shotguns can be used to counter automatic weapons. Although even the French special forces use Saiga! If now security is posted in every shopping center, everything must be issued to at least AKMSU, or Vityaz!
          1. +11
            25 March 2024 21: 36
            If security is now posted in every shopping center, everything must be issued to at least AKMSU
            Yes, at least install tanks. This won't solve the problem. The problem can only be solved by eliminating the reasons for the possibility of terrorist attacks, in this case it is a mess with migration.
            1. +4
              26 March 2024 00: 07
              The problem can only be solved by eliminating the reasons for the possibility of terrorist attacks, in this case it is a mess with migration.

              It's a mess with migration, that's true.
              But for sure, in advance there was a “casting” of objects suitable for a terrorist attack, that is, those where the security was the least capable.
              Security is always divided along the perimeters, the outside car cannot drive up to the entrance, the parking lot is separated from the entrance, they must get out of the car and walk to the entrance.
              Cars that can get to the entrance pass through a barrier and along a path fenced with concrete blocks.
              The barrier can be knocked down if you are in an armored car, and a simple car may well be damaged by a collision. A broken barrier is already an emergency, grounds for the immediate deployment of the RRT to the scene of the incident.
              Next, the car must leave the scene of the terrorist attack, again there is a barrier, a narrow path fenced with concrete blocks, all this takes time, but is it possible to drive along a narrow path made of blocks if you are full of adrenaline? And also the SBI is already on the way, probably still an armed guard in a booth at the barriers.
              The measures are, by and large, cheap, but the terrorists would not have been able to drive up and leave the crime scene so calmly.
              So the owner of the property, in my opinion, did not take proper security measures.
              And the fact that the Prosecutor General’s Office does not see security violations, in my opinion, is a reason to check the employees of the Prosecutor General’s Office.
              1. 0
                27 March 2024 10: 03
                So it is possible to agree to the need to “check” those who appointed the Prosecutor General’s Office. Don't rock the galley. The rowers feel sick.
        3. +22
          25 March 2024 21: 06
          What is cowardice

          Most likely, this is the same banal story as at the front. No one wanted to take responsibility (then they will knock on the cap), everything should be decided by the big guys at the head of the vertical, so they decided for an hour while the crocus was burning. A vertical where a couple of people decide, she like this
        4. -2
          25 March 2024 21: 56
          The riot police drove for an hour due to our widespread carelessness. This is Moscow, the war is far away, the terrorist attacks have long been forgotten, and there was no information about the attack either, or it was very late!
          1. +12
            25 March 2024 22: 30
            From the riot police base to Crocus it is a 5-minute drive. 5 minutes for the duty group to jump into the car. 10 minutes after the command to leave, riot police were supposed to be on site. But there is another time period: the time of receiving information and making a decision. It turns out that this segment is about an hour. This is not carelessness, I don’t even know what to call it. Perhaps it's the system.
            1. 0
              26 March 2024 05: 13
              5 minutes this is a police station and not riot police, he was far away
              1. +3
                26 March 2024 10: 27
                Madam, the riot police base is located in Strogino - 5 minutes by car.
          2. -3
            26 March 2024 06: 03
            Leave your fantasies to your family.
            You are very far from this topic.
            Moreover, he himself admitted that you are also a goofball
            1. +1
              26 March 2024 07: 57
              Show me the ruler, distance measurer!
              Before being rude, try to understand what I wrote, although what am I talking about......
              1. 0
                26 March 2024 10: 34
                Do you know how to use a ruler yourself? I changed it especially for you using Yandex maps: 3 km 300 m in a straight line. Along the way, of course, there will be a little more, but not much.
                1. +1
                  26 March 2024 13: 00
                  I was right in my assumptions about your understanding of the text. You are talking about meters and centimeters, but I am talking about a topic from which I am far from...

                  You're probably a special forces ranger, and you've definitely passed all the hot spots, I guessed it right, admit it? Or, at a minimum, a combat training officer for SOBR, right?
                  You are very insightful and at once determined that I am a dreamer and very far from the topic. These terrorists wouldn’t even have time to take a step there!
                  1. 0
                    26 March 2024 13: 53
                    Dear, you are talking about some kind of blizzard. Where did you see in my comments that I called you a dreamer, far from the topic.
                    You wrote that this is carelessness. And I answered you that, apparently, the problem is in the system. I wrote about time and distance to illustrate that it was technically possible to arrive much faster.
                    Regarding understanding the text: Please, delve into the meaning of what is written yourself, do not rush to bang on the keyboard with a feeling of wounded pride.
                    1. +2
                      26 March 2024 16: 01
                      Sergey, in this situation it’s quite an answer. I admit, we didn’t quite understand each other. I shake hands, no questions asked!

                      Just recently I was talking with someone who was extremely careful in his answers, but with fattening hints that, they say, “we swam, we know,” “a military man,” well, I didn’t notice the emotions...
                      1. +2
                        26 March 2024 17: 14
                        It's good that we understood each other. Shake your hand.
            2. +2
              26 March 2024 08: 06
              "......According to information provided by the chairman of the Investigative Committee, Alexander Bastrykin, the investigation was able to establish the sequence of events of the terrorist attack at Crocus City Hall. According to him, the shooters entered the building at 19:58 and left the concert venue at 20:11. .."
        5. -1
          25 March 2024 22: 54
          ramzay21
          Should private security companies fight terrorists?

          And private security companies too. To do this, the post must be equipped with at least a “panic button”, but was there one? If there was, then why didn’t they take advantage of it when the shooting started on the street. The arrival time of the Russian Guard response team should ensure the timely implementation of measures. Moreover, this is not Mukhosransk, but the capital, Moscow. And let the competent authorities sort out the weapons of the private security company and the work procedure of the facility’s security officers.
          1. +3
            26 March 2024 03: 50
            It seems that the competent authorities no longer exist, or their competence is expressed only in protecting the state from its citizens.
        6. +1
          26 March 2024 00: 06
          Why did the riot police drive for an hour, although its headquarters, the Russian National Guard, is nearby?

          There are a lot of questions here. For example, how could it turn out that after a warning from the US secret services about terrorist attacks being prepared in Moscow in places of mass events, no one in the government, nor in the State Duma, nor in the FSB, nor the Ministry of Internal Affairs, nor the National Guard, nor our other numerous security services even scratched their head and did not take any precautionary safety measures in advance. Information from the Americans was simply ignored. Why do we still, even in war conditions, not include requirements for their protection by state security services and ensuring their security in the standards for holding mass events? We didn’t have enough of Dubrovka, Beslan, and Budenovsk? And it is truly incomprehensible why our services took such an impermissibly long time to respond to signals received after the attack, did not intercept the terrorists in Krasnogorsk, but stopped and detained them only in the Bryansk region, 1000 km from Moscow.
          1. +3
            26 March 2024 01: 31
            For example, how could it turn out that after a warning from the US secret services about terrorist attacks being prepared in Moscow at places of mass events, no one in the government, nor in the State Duma, nor in the FSB, nor the Ministry of Internal Affairs, nor the National Guard, nor our other numerous security services even scratched their head and did not take any precautionary safety measures in advance.

            But this is not a secret.
            It was announced at the highest level that the American warnings were a provocation. That’s why no one took any measures. Who wants accusations that they allegedly played along with the Americans?
            https://www.interfax.ru/russia/951234
        7. -1
          26 March 2024 06: 47
          Quote: ramzay21
          And what were the police officers doing in the next building, armed with real AKSU assault rifles and real PM pistols? Why did the riot police travel for an hour, even though their headquarters is very close? Is this cowardice, betrayal, or following the orders of those who cover up terrorists?

          What can we talk about if Kolokoltsev himself arrived 3 hours later...
      2. +24
        25 March 2024 20: 59
        Even more questions for Agalarov...

        What about the Agalarovs? They make money in our country, our country is a food source for them, but this is not news for a long time!
        1. +14
          25 March 2024 21: 02
          Quote: ramzay21
          What about the Agalarovs? They make money in our country, our country is a food source for them
          And not only for them
      3. +6
        25 March 2024 21: 07
        Quote: Black
        fire for show,

        ===
        regarding fire prevention in the center near Podolyaki, this topic was raised on the tg channel
      4. +3
        25 March 2024 21: 44
        The main thing is that it is smooth on paper, and everything corresponds to the text. In practice, no one cared.
      5. +9
        25 March 2024 21: 52
        Quote: Black
        Even more questions for Agalarov... does the Prosecutor General’s Office still not see any violations?
        The Agalarovs drove the Crocus in an interesting way, a fire service for show, a quick response service also for show and without weapons, the family in Russia was not bad

        The Crocus City building is probably equipped with a video surveillance system, which is displayed on the monitors of the central security post.
        Why didn't the security at the central post notice the terrorists?
        Why didn't the security call the rapid response team and the police from the neighboring building?
        Are the guards connected to terrorists?
      6. +9
        25 March 2024 22: 15
        Quote: Black
        Even more questions for Agalarov... does the Prosecutor General’s Office still not see any violations?
        The Agalarovs drove the Crocus in an interesting way, a fire service for show, a quick response service also for show and without weapons, the family in Russia was not bad

        I'll add. Judging by the way it was blazing, the materials used during construction were not the ones that should be used.
      7. +9
        25 March 2024 22: 27
        Quote: Black
        Even more questions for Agalarov... does the Prosecutor General’s Office still not see any violations?
        The Agalarovs drove the Crocus in an interesting way, a fire service for show, a quick response service also for show and without weapons, the family in Russia was not bad

        You raise a very interesting topic!
        Agalarov in the recent past to the governor of Moscow. Region He opened the door for Gromov with his foot, I think he continued these habits with Vorobyov.
        There are a lot of questions for him. It is no wonder that after the terrorist attack, all shopping malls in Moscow and the Moscow region owned by the family were immediately closed.
        There are such corruption connections with our bureaucrats - mother, don’t worry. fellow
        Let's start with security, which was not there, just as there were no alarm or warning systems.
        To the floor km in a straight line Government building Moscow. Region There are a couple of PPS crews constantly on the site, and the Agalarovsky chop shop is not far away.

        The Tajiks fired in the stalls and mezzanine, from which the “roof” caught fire, and it blazed noticeably and immediately. They did not have “bumblebees”, nor did they have “flies”. How they set fire in several places at once, where there was a fire alarm and what materials the cladding and the dome itself were made of. The fire spread quickly, judging by the video from the cart!
        But dozens of visitors suffocated and died under the rubble!
        I am sure that we will never know the truth on these issues raised.
        Alas.....
    2. +1
      26 March 2024 00: 07
      About 30 years ago, a security guard with a Saiga was just not at every gas station, but then the screws were tightened very tightly, now they have very serious restrictions on traveling with weapons, and even more so on their use. When I wanted an alarm for my dacha, the private security company directly said - it will work, we will come to the site, but we have no more authority. Only private security, and she has an hour to go...
    3. +6
      26 March 2024 00: 12
      Security guards are divided into categories - 4th category handcuffs stick, 5th added injury, 6th has the right to use service weapons Saiga and Izh-71, this weapon is assigned to him and he is issued a RSL permit in which a photograph, surname, name, model number of the weapon, he hands over every year shooting, the boss does not have the right to issue an employee with a service weapon with 4th and 5th category; in crowded places, a security guard does not have the right to be on duty with a service weapon, a maximum of a baton and handcuffs. A security guard with a 6th rank needs to be paid more, so in security agencies 90 percent are 4th rank. I suspect that it was the 4th rank guards who stood at the entrance and under no circumstances were they allowed to have weapons.
      1. 0
        26 March 2024 01: 24
        The owner of the center said that they were generally “controllers.”
        That is, as I understand it, they did not have security guard status (as well as a license)...
    4. +1
      26 March 2024 06: 51
      If these weapons were in the arsenal of the security organization, then why in this case was it reported that “the guards were not armed”?


      Because it is prohibited to have weapons at public events. Just in case. But, as it turns out, there are all sorts of cases...
    5. +1
      26 March 2024 08: 10
      Body armor against AKM at point blank range? You are funny. It’s easier to cover yourself with paper, the same effect. The attack lasted several minutes, security, as I understood, was immediately posted at the entrance, they didn’t even have time to utter a word, most likely there wasn’t even a signal to the police. Leave on what grounds? Keep a psychic on staff? Well, if we left, it would take at least 5 minutes, by that time the terrorists would no longer have patrol officers, they would all be released. How nice it must be to be smart after the event.
      The only defense against a terrorist attack: prevention at the preparation stage.
      1. 0
        26 March 2024 14: 04
        Write to Khinshtein...
    6. +2
      26 March 2024 21: 20
      What kind of money to earn, don’t tell me. Here, from today's vacancies: from 1 to 800 rubles per shift. Work in two days. That is, 2-000 tr. per month, minus taxes. In Moscow, of course, there are more, but it’s also more expensive to live there...
      1. +1
        27 March 2024 05: 17
        Most of the guards there are from the regions. You can pay them less - anyway, if they are not happy, they will agree. They come on watch.
  2. +18
    25 March 2024 20: 52
    If these weapons were in the arsenal of the security organization, then why in this case was it reported that “the guards were not armed”?

    Weapons in the arsenal and weapons in the hands are not the same thing.
    1. +1
      25 March 2024 21: 12
      Quote from Scientist
      Weapons in the arsenal and weapons in the hands are not the same thing.

      Yes, we need to find out what the GBR was actually armed with, from which many expect a daring entry into battle with five machine gunners.
      1. +1
        25 March 2024 21: 17
        So that’s the question, automatic weapons are not allowed. Will Saiga stop machine gunners? At a short distance, of course, yes, but what if the battle distance is longer? The crocus is so huge. Here you either need machine guns or submachine guns. That they will now be handed over to the guards?
        1. 0
          25 March 2024 21: 19
          Quote: BAT-MENT
          Here you either need machine guns or submachine guns. What will the security be given out now?

          Hardly.
          1. 0
            25 March 2024 21: 21
            So what is the point of armed guards if they are outgunned by the attackers?
            1. +3
              25 March 2024 21: 22
              Quote: BAT-MENT
              So what is the point of armed guards if they are outgunned by the attackers?

              Well, private security companies sometimes have internecine squabbles. Redistributions of the security services market. It’s stupid to come to the disassembly with a gas canister.
              1. 0
                25 March 2024 21: 23
                A shotgun then is just the thing!
                1. -2
                  25 March 2024 21: 29
                  Quote: BAT-MENT
                  A shotgun then is just the thing!

                  A drained Degtyarev machine gun is also nice to have. How can the enemy know what if it shoots?
        2. 0
          25 March 2024 22: 45
          Saiga is not only 12 gauge, but also 5.45, + there was hardly any targeted shooting at a distance of over 100m. And civilian weapons are not as bad as they seem. Yes, even if the guards were armed with pistols, they could at least do something (as they say, sell themselves at a higher price), but since they are punching bags, why do they need weapons at all if they are not armed?
          1. 0
            26 March 2024 00: 45
            You are of course right, but you see, this is all the so-called “security theater”.
            It is needed to reassure society and create the appearance of control, the appearance of a safe environment.
            Even if you arm your guards as "heavy" and dress them in assault gear, terrorists will find a way to carry out a terrorist attack. The security, figuratively speaking, has one road, the scoundrels have hundreds of them.
            Only painstaking operational work gives results in such cases. And that’s not 100%.
            Considering that the Ministry of Internal Affairs has recently been so broken that it is not able to effectively carry out operational work in the field of countering extremism, it is carried out mainly by the office of the “big brothers”. Well, when the “big brothers” don’t pull it out, they give whipping boys to the not very smart ones - the Ministry of Internal Affairs.
            So it goes...
          2. -1
            27 March 2024 05: 20
            Some guard the body of the owner (owner). Here they are armed.
          3. 0
            27 March 2024 20: 33
            Saiga cal. 5.45 never existed in nature. There is Saiga 410. But this is a complete farce, the Chops are getting rid of them. The private security company does not use rifled weapons. By law, only smoothbore.
      2. -4
        25 March 2024 21: 42
        If there were about a hundred armored guards there and even with a short barrel, five terrorists would have no chance.
        1. 0
          27 March 2024 20: 34
          Will you personally pay all hundred 6th grade security guards?
          1. 0
            27 March 2024 21: 31
            Well, there are poor people there who run the crocus, it’s a shabby scumbag with an area of ​​100 meters, where does the money come from to pay for it?
    2. +1
      26 March 2024 08: 12
      Moreover, well, if they had, say, machine guns behind them, so what? Suddenly, several people with AKM run in and the machine gunner doesn’t even have time to understand. Well, an armed person will not stand for hours in a state of readiness to use weapons. It’s just that instead of the corpses of guards there would be corpses with weapons in holsters.
  3. +13
    25 March 2024 20: 52
    The owner of Crocus should be checked for involvement in the terrorist attack.
    By the way, what about insurance?
    1. +23
      25 March 2024 20: 57
      Quote: Million
      The owner of Crocus should be checked for involvement in the terrorist attack.

      But producer Prigozhin is very concerned that his friends have lost their business, but there are no condolences for those killed, and his wife, singer Valeria, is concerned about where they should perform now.
      They are non-Russians.
      1. +10
        25 March 2024 21: 13
        So where they benefit is their homeland!
        1. +5
          25 March 2024 21: 16
          Quote: BAT-MENT
          So where they benefit is their homeland!

          They don’t yell against Russia like Galkin, but they do the same thing, for them the main money is money, and they root for their “cellmates.”
          1. +8
            25 March 2024 21: 17
            They are simply smarter than Galkin!
    2. +1
      26 March 2024 08: 13
      Maybe stop talking nonsense? Terrorist attacks are usually not included in insurance.
  4. +1
    25 March 2024 20: 52
    According to Khinshtein, this private security company “guards” another 16 objects.

    Well, these are private security companies, but they don’t work, and whether they are needed at all, maybe it’s time to think about it.
    1. 0
      27 March 2024 20: 35
      You don't need it, business needs it.
  5. +2
    25 March 2024 20: 54
    Something is not entirely clear about this weapon. It seems to be there, but in fact it is not. Here we have to delve into the jungle of laws on private security companies.
    1. +2
      25 March 2024 21: 01
      Quote: tralflot1832
      Something is not entirely clear about this weapon. It seems to be there, but in fact it is not. Here we have to delve into the jungle of laws on private security companies.

      Here again is the question about private security companies, why should they have weapons, even in the Baltics, only clubs, but not weapons.
      1. +1
        25 March 2024 21: 11
        Quote: carpenter
        in the Baltic states

        ===
        The city municipal police work well there. strong guys with weapons in cars. constant patrolling.
        1. 0
          25 March 2024 21: 14
          Quote: Victorio
          The city municipal police work well there. strong guys with weapons in cars. constant patrolling.

          Well, that’s what I’m talking about, I live there and see it. It’s easier for me to press a button for the municipalities, and they will arrive quickly, 5 minutes maximum.
          1. +4
            25 March 2024 21: 22
            Quote: carpenter
            I live there and see

            ===
            left in December. Here. Krasnodar region, I see the police only at their building. freedom, people smoke and drink without restrictions, cars are parked everywhere, music from cars is full at any time. generally fun.
            1. 0
              25 March 2024 23: 09
              Quote: Victorio
              cars are parked everywhere, music from cars is at full capacity at any time. generally fun

              Even in the Baltic states, this is not possible. It's time to understand that this is not the same world as it was 20 years ago.
              1. -3
                26 March 2024 01: 29
                Quote: carpenter
                Quote: Victorio
                cars are parked everywhere, music from cars is at full capacity at any time. generally fun

                Even in the Baltic states, this is not possible. It's time to understand that this is not the same world as it was 20 years ago.


                Baltic extinctions, as they say on our forum. Why do you live there? They don't like Russians there.
                1. -3
                  26 March 2024 06: 41
                  Yeah, in Russia they really love it
                  Lol
                2. 0
                  26 March 2024 18: 38
                  Quote: Military Commissar77
                  Why do you live there? They don't like Russians there.

                  So I was born in Narva during the Soviet Union, and no one else is waiting for us anywhere, we turned out to be superfluous.
              2. 0
                26 March 2024 16: 32
                Quote: carpenter
                Even in the Baltic states,

                ===
                I won’t say that everything is as it should be. In the summer, every time my son and I returned from the beach, we picked up a bag of trash thrown here and there.
      2. 0
        25 March 2024 22: 47
        La ou je me trouve ce so t des sociétés privées qui garde un site 'sensible' elles sont t armées mais seulement dans jn premier temps avec des pistolets 9mm
        1. 0
          25 March 2024 22: 52
          Quote from Yanni Kounnar
          La ou je me trouve ce so t des sociétés privées qui garde un site 'sensible' elles sont t armées mais seulement dans jn premier temps avec des pistolets 9mm

          Security should be handled by the police and security forces, but not by private organizations.
    2. 0
      25 March 2024 22: 53
      Quote: tralflot1832
      Here you have to get into the jungle of laws on private security companies.

      Read the new gun law of January 25, 24. Security of public events with weapons is permitted by private security companies, but there are reservations and nuances. Responsibility lies with the organizers of the event. Security with weapons is one price, with special equipment another request And yet - Ramadan is a holiday for Muslims! But why does everyone think that the values ​​of ordinary Muslims and radical ones are the same? In the morning (on the same day) in Kabul, a suicide bombing was carried out in a mosque. For radical Islamists, a traditional admirer of Islam is also a “giaur” (infidel) hi
      1. -5
        25 March 2024 23: 11
        Quote: fif21
        . Security of public events with weapons is permitted by private security companies, but there are reservations and nuances.

        I can’t understand, a private office and with weapons, this is nonsense.
        1. +3
          25 March 2024 23: 15
          Quote: carpenter
          I can’t understand, a private office and with weapons, this is nonsense.

          Is it normal for PMCs with tanks? wassat
          1. 0
            25 March 2024 23: 28
            Quote: fif21

            Is it normal for PMCs with tanks?

            I understand PMCs with batons.
        2. +1
          26 March 2024 01: 30
          Quote: carpenter
          Quote: fif21
          . Security of public events with weapons is permitted by private security companies, but there are reservations and nuances.

          I can’t understand, a private office and with weapons, this is nonsense.


          PMC Wagner
    3. +5
      26 March 2024 01: 02
      Well, firstly, it’s easier to get a 4th category security guard’s certificate (does not have the right to carry weapons, only special equipment) than a 6th category (has the right to serve with weapons), accordingly, in order to avoid personnel shortages, private security companies deploy unarmed people wherever possible (4th) category.
      And cheaper, by the way.
      And smarter organizations call similar positions “controllers”; in this case, a license is not needed, and the person carrying out security and detective activities does not face liability for “exceeding authority.” In case something happens.
      By the way, I think that if you give each guard a gun, the number of deaths from this measure will exceed in a year the number of deaths in the crocus (misuse, crossbow, careless handling, attacks for the purpose of taking possession, loss with subsequent entry into the criminal environment) .
      Among the guards there are different people.
      So... well...
  6. +18
    25 March 2024 20: 54
    (group) is obliged to arrive on site in emergency cases. But didn't arrive

    And another one and a half kilometers from Crocus are the buildings of the Moscow Regional Duma and the regional government. And there are probably a lot of heavily armed security forces there and nearby. It took them 10 minutes to get to Crocus. But they didn't come.
    1. +10
      25 March 2024 21: 04
      Quote from Scientist
      It took them 10 minutes to get to Crocus. But they didn't come.

      The question is “did you want to go”? Let the FSB sort it out. There are many unanswered questions when Central Asians have the status of “untouchables” in Russia.
      1. +1
        26 March 2024 01: 17
        Carpenter. In Russia there is a law (order) on the protection of public facilities adopted by the Government of the Russian Federation with regulations. Don’t talk nonsense.
    2. +9
      25 March 2024 21: 16
      And another one and a half kilometers from Crocus are the buildings of the Moscow Regional Duma and the regional government. And there are probably a lot of heavily armed security forces there and nearby. It took them 10 minutes to get to Crocus. But they didn't come

      Should they? In fact, these security forces have THEIR security object, for which they are RESPONSIBLE. Abandoning YOUR post, rushing off to no one knows where and why... Well, well... And pulling out the guards from an object of interest, creating a mess nearby is a classic of the genre.
      1. +5
        25 March 2024 21: 26
        Quote: tolancop
        In fact, these security forces have THEIR security object, for which they are RESPONSIBLE. Abandon YOUR post, rushing off to who knows where and why...

        It was not for nothing that during the war the Germans preferred to attack at the junctions between our divisions or even armies. They knew very well that each division would pretend that this did not concern it - let its neighbor take the rap.
        1. -1
          26 March 2024 06: 45
          But these were not Germans or divisions.
          In one place, thousands of people are being killed and no one can fight back.
          In another there are empty buildings, as it is evening
          YES, not everything is so obvious
          Aha

          Well, there the she-wolf general said that Kolokoltsev himself “arrived immediately” - after 2,5 hours, it seems
      2. -2
        25 March 2024 23: 14
        Quote: tolancop
        Abandon YOUR post, rushing off to no one knows where and why..

        Well, yes, the “hut” of the parasite oligarch needs to be protected, but 6500 people don’t care about protecting. Who are you security people?
      3. -3
        26 March 2024 06: 44
        Yea Yea
        Late Friday evening, all the deputies and others were probably in the building of the regional Duma - they work around the clock for the benefit of citizens
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +1
      26 March 2024 01: 32
      Quote from Scientist
      (group) is obliged to arrive on site in emergency cases. But didn't arrive

      And another one and a half kilometers from Crocus are the buildings of the Moscow Regional Duma and the regional government. And there are probably a lot of heavily armed security forces there and nearby. It took them 10 minutes to get to Crocus. But they didn't come.


      Well, if the Tajiks tried to take the regional administration by storm, then the security forces, armed to the teeth as you say, would repulse them. And so...
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. +7
    25 March 2024 20: 57
    In general, the handsome guards have no weapons, no, that’s the way it should be, they still kept the doors closed. The question is who are the biggest terrorists.
    1. 0
      25 March 2024 21: 16
      Quote: Incvizitor
      In general, the handsome guards have no weapons, no, that’s the way it should be, they still kept the doors closed.

      And if the emergency doors were open, then at each door it would be necessary to keep at least two more guards armed with machine guns so that the terrorists would not break in.
      1. +3
        26 March 2024 04: 17
        This means that it is necessary to develop a system where people can, in case of an emergency, open evacuation doors THEMSELVES from the inside (in parallel with the possibility of unlocking such doors from the central security point)... Some kind of emergency buttons or something. In the age of technology, anything can be invented, if there is a desire... And if for the state citizens are only a tool for enriching the “respected” Agalarovs, then they will then find suffocated mothers on the stairs, hugging their children for the last time...

        And from TV screens, hypocrites tell tales about demography...
        1. +1
          27 March 2024 20: 44
          Absolutely agree. Only the requirements of anti-terrorism conflict with the requirements of the Ministry of Emergency Situations. Some demand that everything be closed, others that everything be open.
    2. +2
      25 March 2024 21: 21
      Quote: Incvizitor
      In general, the handsome guards have no weapons, no, that’s the way it should be, they still kept the doors closed.

      Although everyone knew that as many as 6500 spectators would come to the concert. This is professional suitability, or assistants to terrorists. (expressed incorrectly, but nothing else comes to mind).
      Well, ban me then, let me answer for everything.
      1. -1
        26 March 2024 01: 26
        I work at almost such a facility; there would be no problems with evacuation if there were no terrorists with machine guns. All closed doors are opened without panic by administrators and security guards (how and with what is opened is information not for free access) Not a single facility in the world is not designed for this. The Twins in New York were ready for anything - except planes in the front.
        1. +1
          26 March 2024 04: 20
          If it weren't for the terrorists with machine guns, people would have calmly exited through the main entrance...

          Don't go crazy...
        2. -5
          26 March 2024 06: 59
          Get out of there quickly with this approach
          This one is not yours

          The emergency evacuation system should work specifically in an emergency situation
  9. +3
    25 March 2024 21: 01
    Well, they probably got lost - why the hell interfere, they have wives, let it sort itself out somehow. These are not Wagnerians.
    1. 0
      27 March 2024 20: 45
      I found someone to use as an example.
  10. -5
    25 March 2024 21: 02
    All of these private security officers must be held accountable for failure to perform their official duties resulting in the death of two or more persons.

    "Criminal Code of the Russian Federation" from 13.06.1996 N 63-ФЗ (ed. From 14.02.2024)

    Yes, everyone who reads this and feels that he has “balls” has the right to write a statement to the court about criminal prosecution.
    1. +4
      25 March 2024 21: 18
      Quote from JÜRGEN WEGNER
      All these security guards it is necessary to hold accountable for failure to perform their official duties resulting in the death of two or more persons.

      But what about the “sovereign people” who were within a radius of 1.5 km and did not scratch themselves even for an hour? These are their DIRECT job responsibilities.
      And with regard to private security companies, we still need to see whether they are required by contract to counter terrorists laughing
      1. -4
        25 March 2024 21: 30
        If this is an armed guard and has a firearm at his disposal, then yes. Required. Firearms, permits for them are not issued in order to shoot hares in the forest. Namely, to prevent the commission of a crime against a protected object and protected persons. It is a direct duty to use it against armed persons of a protected object.

        As for officials, yes... They are also subject to responsibility.

        But it will be difficult to attract them. They will motivate you with the arrival time according to the standards, traffic jams and other palmistry. And again, they will refer to “unverified information.”

        Chop was obliged to take the blow with the firearm.
        1. +3
          25 March 2024 21: 35
          Quote from JÜRGEN WEGNER
          As for officials, yes... They are also subject to responsibility.
          But it will be difficult to attract them.

          Quote from JÜRGEN WEGNER
          Chop was obliged to take the blow with the firearm.

          Did I understand correctly that we will punish those we can reach?
          1. -2
            25 March 2024 21: 48
            Andrew,

            only to the guilty ones who can be reached. It's up to the culprits.

            Create an initiative group, calculate the reaction time according to the regulations, request billing of calls to the police.

            There is every opportunity to achieve this. It's in your hands.
            1. +2
              25 March 2024 21: 56
              Quote from JÜRGEN WEGNER
              Create an initiative group, calculate the reaction time according to the regulations, request billing of calls to the police.

              There is every opportunity to achieve this. It's in your hands.

              Why are you shifting everything onto me? From “that opera” - “self-isolation, self-medication, self-education.” In our country there are a LOT of departments and people working there who, according to their OFFICIAL RESPONSIBILITIES, must do this laughing..
              Quote from JÜRGEN WEGNER
              Chop was obliged to take the blow with the firearm.

              He is not obliged to do anything that is not within the scope specified in the contract. Do not confuse “sovereign people” and “private owners”. Even if something is spelled out in the contract, employees will be responsible within the framework of their employment contract to the company, and that in turn will be responsible to the contractor within the framework of the concluded agreement.
              1. -2
                25 March 2024 22: 06
                Andrey, I’m not putting anything on you.

                But the very concept of a security organization that has received a permit for firearms implies security with these weapons.

                This is precisely the degree of guilt that is provided for in accordance with the article of the Criminal Code.

                If you are not Russian, the offer to create a group is wrong.

                I am not a resident of Russia. And not even the CIS. I'm just very worried about the deaths of children. When this happens, it's always the adults' fault.

                And don't give a damn about the employment contract. The 15-year-old boy had no duty to save.

                Therefore, I beg you not to talk like “not a good guy.”

                Fear God.
                1. +7
                  25 March 2024 22: 21
                  Quote from JÜRGEN WEGNER
                  But the very concept of a security organization that has received a permit for firearms implies security with these weapons.

                  This is precisely the degree of guilt that is provided for in accordance with the article of the Criminal Code.

                  Quote from JÜRGEN WEGNER
                  I am not a resident of Russia. And not even the CIS.

                  Then it’s better to take the trouble to study the legislation of the country where you propose to perform certain actions. And then make suggestions. We have enough empty noise of our own hi
                  1. -1
                    25 March 2024 23: 29
                    1. Crime under Art. 125 of the Criminal Code, is committed exclusively through inaction, which is expressed in the deliberate abandonment without help of a person who is in a condition dangerous to life and health and is deprived of the opportunity to take measures for self-preservation.
                2. -1
                  25 March 2024 23: 06
                  Quote from JÜRGEN WEGNER
                  But the very concept of a security organization that has received a permit for firearms implies security with these weapons.

                  Yes! If so, these are the requirements of the event organizer. Therefore, any whim, for your money. hi
                  1. -2
                    25 March 2024 23: 25
                    Cowardice and meanness - a whim for your money? How much money does it take to protect a child being removed before your eyes?
                  2. -2
                    25 March 2024 23: 27
                    Cowardice - are you saying that the contract should stipulate that rescuing the child being removed is part of the duty? What if it is not covered by the contract?
                    1. 0
                      26 March 2024 00: 15
                      Quote from JÜRGEN WEGNER
                      Cowardice - are you saying that the contract should stipulate that rescuing the child being removed is part of the duty? What if it is not covered by the contract?

                      You are a happy person, you can afford emotions. Therefore, I will skip your insult and rudeness. Yes ! The realities of life in the Russian Federation are such that any work by private companies is performed under a contract (according to your contract). And if the private security company did not fulfill the terms of the contract, then it will answer for it.
                      1. 0
                        26 March 2024 00: 51
                        It was not my intention to offend. A very emotional person who loves children, respects women and the elderly.

                        Just an hour ago I read on another site:
                        A man beat an elderly 73-year-old woman in a supermarket.
                        Man, dear and respected - where were the men in this supermarket?
                        Has everyone really lost their shit out of fear? Or is it normal to beat grandmothers in supermarkets? Are there NO contracts in the brains of Russian men?

                        According to this private security company, he has a violation under two articles of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.

                        And also, there is such a concept - I am a man, protection and support for the weak. And there is a doormat.

                        I beg you, do not convince me that in Russia there are no men capable of feats without a contract.

                        I have a very high opinion of Russia. I fought here with officials, fought with Russophobes, and on such a site you talk to me about contracts when they came to kill the children of Russia!!!!!

                        Please don't.
                      2. 0
                        26 March 2024 01: 22
                        Quote from JÜRGEN WEGNER
                        I beg you, do not convince me that in Russia there are no men capable of feats without a contract.

                        I believe that taking responsibility for people’s lives with a rubber stick and a gas can is already a feat. The guards are killed first. And the man who took advantage of the fact that the animal ran out of cartridges and took away his machine gun, isn’t he worthy of respect? Our strength is in the TRUTH, whoever is to blame will answer. There are organizers, there are performers, there are accomplices, there are sponsors of what happened. And there is no forgiveness for them.
                  3. -1
                    25 March 2024 23: 30
                    1. Crime under Art. 125 of the Criminal Code, is committed exclusively through inaction, which is expressed in the deliberate abandonment without help of a person who is in a condition dangerous to life and health and is deprived of the opportunity to take measures for self-preservation.
                    1. -2
                      27 March 2024 05: 40
                      Are you deliberately omitting part of the text or due to misunderstanding?
                      This one: “if the culprit had the opportunity to provide assistance to this person and was obliged to take care of him or he himself put him in a condition dangerous to life or health.”
                      Whether any of the unarmed guards were able to help anyone remains to be seen. Everything else cannot apply to them.
                      In general, your speech looks very much like an intention to insult, and also like a provocation.
              2. +3
                25 March 2024 22: 14
                Private security is PROHIBITED from using firearms in crowded places! (Law of the Russian Federation "On private detective and security activities in the Russian Federation" Art. 18)
                1. 0
                  25 March 2024 22: 33
                  Quote from vvnab
                  Private security is PROHIBITED from using firearms in crowded places!

                  Well, this alone clears up all claims against the private security company.
                2. +3
                  25 March 2024 22: 59
                  Well, police officers are also not allowed to be in a crowd: “A police officer does not have the right to use firearms in a large gathering of citizens if random persons may be harmed as a result of its use.” (according to the police law in article 23), if you do not take into account the nuances
                3. +5
                  25 March 2024 23: 00
                  I didn't understand something.
                  This very Article 18 allows the use of weapons in the event of a threat to the security guard himself or to the protected PROPERTY.
                  And nothing is said at all about protecting people. That is, the Tajiks could go and shoot people without causing harm to the protected PROPERTY, and the guard could only try to persuade him to stop this disgrace....
                  belay
                  I don’t understand who wrote this Law? Who is author?
                4. -1
                  25 March 2024 23: 13
                  Quote from vvnab
                  Private security is PROHIBITED from using firearms in crowded places! (Law of the Russian Federation "On private detective and security activities in the Russian Federation" Art. 18)

                  I thought so too, but changes have occurred. Read the “Law on Weapons in the Russian Federation” as amended on January 25.01. 24g st. 24 if I'm not mistaken. This is where it says PROHIBITED.......but with the exception of national clothing..... hi
          2. +1
            25 March 2024 23: 28
            Quote: Adrey
            Quote from JÜRGEN WEGNER
            As for officials, yes... They are also subject to responsibility.
            But it will be difficult to attract them.

            Quote from JÜRGEN WEGNER
            Chop was obliged to take the blow with the firearm.

            Did I understand correctly that we will punish those we can reach?

            He's drinking....
            Don't ask him.
            The security officer crushed his leg with five marks.
            1. -3
              25 March 2024 23: 39
              I don’t go to “five-room” clubs.
              And I don't drink either. Apparently I communicate with accomplices of terrorists. If this is the case, no one is to blame. The children have themselves to blame. Right?
              1. +2
                26 March 2024 00: 19
                Quote from JÜRGEN WEGNER
                I don’t go to “five-room” clubs.

                But in vain! lol
                1. -1
                  26 March 2024 16: 50
                  Quote: fif21
                  But in vain! lol

                  ===
                  yeah, it's expensive.
              2. +1
                26 March 2024 00: 30
                Quote from JÜRGEN WEGNER
                And I don't drink either.

                Not our man at all.
                Quote from JÜRGEN WEGNER
                Apparently I communicate with accomplices of terrorists.

                And again I didn’t guess! You communicate with people who know how to hide their pain, but have a good memory.
          3. 0
            26 March 2024 04: 21
            I would say who is not afraid to kick... After all, a faceless private security company is more convenient to kick than the toothy departments of Kolokoltsev and Zolotov
            1. +2
              26 March 2024 14: 15
              Quote: Nikolay310
              I would say who is not afraid to kick... After all, a faceless private security company is more convenient to kick than the toothy departments of Kolokoltsev and Zolotov

              Kolokoltsev’s department is no longer toothy. Last year, his last special unit, the Thunder squads, was taken away from him.
          4. 0
            27 March 2024 20: 48
            Naturally. Did you think Agalarov and Zolotov would be accused? The last one will be some kind of guard from the province.
      2. +1
        25 March 2024 21: 35
        I think that in emergency cases they should open those same locked doors and organize in every possible way the evacuation of people in an emergency situation, look how the boys showed themselves and there are no heroes to be seen among these guys.
      3. +1
        26 March 2024 01: 34
        Quote: Adrey
        Quote from JÜRGEN WEGNER
        All these security guards it is necessary to hold accountable for failure to perform their official duties resulting in the death of two or more persons.

        But what about the “sovereign people” who were within a radius of 1.5 km and did not scratch themselves even for an hour? These are their DIRECT job responsibilities.
        And with regard to private security companies, we still need to see whether they are required by contract to counter terrorists laughing

        “The sovereign’s people” defend the sovereign. Did the Emperor plan to go to Crocus for a concert? No? Well then, what are the questions?
    2. -1
      25 March 2024 22: 54
      ...Killed by terrorists, of course, too?..
  11. +4
    25 March 2024 21: 07
    Weapons are prohibited at public events. According to the GBR, the question is - where was she?
  12. +5
    25 March 2024 21: 11
    A tank of noodles has already been launched into the ears about external enemies, but not a word about serving and protecting organs. Where were they, what did they do during... The girl Chop will be given the boot, bribes are smooth there.
    1. 0
      26 March 2024 01: 35
      Quote: Phrases
      A tank of noodles has already been launched into the ears about external enemies, but not a word about serving and protecting organs. Where were they, what did they do during... The girl Chop will be given the boot, bribes are smooth there.

      Blame it all on the Americans and their mongrels, you won’t go wrong.
  13. 0
    25 March 2024 21: 19
    If an organization has a weapon, this does not mean at all that an employee working as a janitor in a store walks around with a gun
    1. -2
      26 March 2024 00: 35
      Quote: Bone1
      If an organization has a weapon, this does not mean at all that an employee working as a janitor in a store walks around with a gun

      Here a group of “comrades” decided to throw a fit, don’t give in to provocations. hi
    2. -5
      26 March 2024 07: 02
      “If a police department is located in the same building, this does not mean at all that the employees working there will engage in battle with terrorists” - apparently you wanted to say this too?
  14. -2
    25 March 2024 21: 33
    Quote: ramzay21
    Why did the riot police travel for an hour, even though their headquarters is very close?

    Where did you get such information?
    After 22 minutes, which is really a lot, SOBR was in place. But it was Friday and there were a lot of cars on the Moscow Ring Road.
    1. +4
      25 March 2024 21: 57
      SOBR was in place and waving handkerchiefs after the terrorists who had calmly fled, who were not at all bothered by the many cars on the Moscow Ring Road... And the spectators generally walk around without a bagpipe in their pocket... There were no lawyers, everything will be explained.
      1. -1
        25 March 2024 23: 08
        But if at least every 10th man had a bagpipe in his pocket, then these freaks would be put right there.
        And it’s even more likely that, knowing this situation, they wouldn’t have gone there.
        ============
        Now, of course, witnesses to the kitchen showdown will come running and explain that firearms cannot be sold for free...
        Fine. Let's go gradually.
        We will allow retired military personnel, judges, prosecutors, other security officials, and other “trusted” people to wear them. And let all potential terrorists know about this.
        1. +1
          25 March 2024 23: 32
          Quote: Neo-9947
          But if at least every 10th man had a bagpipe in his pocket, then these freaks would be put right there.
          And it’s even more likely that, knowing this situation, they wouldn’t have gone there.
          ============
          Now, of course, witnesses to the kitchen showdown will come running and explain that firearms cannot be sold for free...
          Fine. Let's go gradually.
          We will allow retired military personnel, judges, prosecutors, other security officials, and other “trusted” people to wear them. And let all potential terrorists know about this.

          Let's remember Evsyukov. Shot 9 people in the store.
          1. -1
            25 March 2024 23: 59
            Oh!
            Witnesses have come forward!
            Well, Evsyukov. And what about Evsyukov? Did he legally own the gun as suggested? Did he undergo re-certification and medical examination for the right to legally own a weapon?
            Or is he just a criminal with an illegal gun, of which there are quite a few running around Russia? And from which it is proposed to defend, since the state is not able to provide security. This is impossible in principle, we are not the USSR.
          2. 0
            26 March 2024 16: 54
            Quote: SovAr238A
            Let's remember Evsyukov. Shot 9 people in the store.

            ===
            What if one of those shot by Evsyukov also had a gun? and that tragic incident would not have happened
        2. +2
          26 March 2024 00: 10
          Quote: Neo-9947
          But if at least every 10th man had a bagpipe in his pocket, then these freaks would be put right there.

          But if at the Zenit-Spartak match every 10th man had a bagpipe in his pocket... Many freaks would have been put right there... Oh, many...Yes
    2. +3
      25 March 2024 23: 03
      Tell them the exact time of arrival so that it becomes clear whether they arrived on time or in time for a shashoshny analysis.
      1. +2
        26 March 2024 08: 50
        And it’s clear that it’s too late.
        Let's say that the terrorists entered at 19:55. They left after 18 minutes, officials said.
        Accordingly, after 22 minutes there was no one left to catch there.
        The only thing I would like to clarify is what is the SOBR standard for the departure of duty shifts?
        Location of SOBR in Strogino. If the road is empty, drive no more than 7-8 minutes. Let's add 5 minutes to traffic jams.
        Well, the signal about the attack came, say, at 19:59. 4 more minutes.
        Approval for travel in combat gear. ??? minutes.
        The SOBR took XX minutes to leave. Let's say 5 minutes.
        Here you have 22 minutes.
        All that remains is to add. They didn’t know the car’s license plate number or make when the SOBR arrived. If the Moscow Ring Road had been blocked, there could have been more casualties. And so they were taken in a deserted place.
  15. -4
    25 March 2024 21: 33
    Here is a quote from Alexander Khinshtein:

    This entire arsenal is stored in the building next door to Crocus (Krasnogorsk, Mezhdunarodnaya, 6), but the guards were on duty without it.

    As the deputy writes, in the same building there is a base of the private security company’s rapid response group, which (the group) is obliged to arrive on site in emergency cases. But it didn’t arrive... Alexander Khinshtein writes that this group “did not go to Crocus City Hall” itself.
    According to Khinshtein, this private security company “guards” another 16 objects.
    And it’s high time to restore order among private security companies. How many private security companies like this are there in the country?! Looking forward to the next "crocus"?!
  16. -1
    25 March 2024 21: 47
    Oh, these "private security companies"! We need to be tougher with these private offices - legalized mafia for taking money. The level is ridiculous - below the baseboard. Damn, the guys on the collective farms who guarded the towers were even more respectable. A simple security guard, he’s no one and there’s no way to call him. He is between a rock and a hard place, i.e. between your boss and the customer (owner of the facility). I see two options: take a tight rein on the selection of personnel for private offices, or completely liquidate them and give everything to the “VOKhR” of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. This is just how I see the situation and believe so.
    1. 0
      27 March 2024 20: 53
      Have you seen the soldiers of the Federal State Unitary Enterprise "Okhrana" of the Russian Guard? You can’t watch ancient veterans and women there without tears. And the Russian Guard's PSBs are almost not involved in physical security; the staff doesn't allow it. There have been no security structures in the Ministry of Internal Affairs for a long time.
  17. -2
    25 March 2024 21: 51
    This entire group deserves to at least go to prison, and at maximum to sit next to terrorists.
  18. -1
    25 March 2024 22: 06
    It would be nice for Khinshtein to familiarize himself with the law “On private detective and security activities in the Russian Federation”, for starters. Article 18 of which states: “It is prohibited to use firearms against women..., as well as in large crowds of people, when the use of weapons may harm strangers.”
    It’s sad that in our country the words deputy and “stupid, narrow-minded person” have become virtually synonymous
    1. 0
      27 March 2024 20: 56
      What are you talking about, this is Zolotov’s main adviser. He knows everything, can do everything, understands everything, goes everywhere with his “competent” opinion.
  19. +6
    25 March 2024 22: 17
    The victims of the terrorist attack and the relatives of the victims should unite and file a lawsuit against Agalarov for creating a threat to the life and health of several thousand citizens by violating the requirements of fire safety rules and regulations at the facility, and failing to ensure safety standards at public events...
    The owners of the establishment must be held accountable by law for the deaths of more than a hundred people and even more victims...
    1. 0
      26 March 2024 00: 48
      first send a demand to Putin for his arrest
  20. -3
    25 March 2024 22: 24
    The owner and distributor of azercrime in Russia should not be responsible for the locked doors and the lack of courage among the churban gangs in the private security company to take up arms.
  21. -3
    25 March 2024 22: 43
    Quote: tolancop

    And pulling guards out of an object of interest by causing a mess nearby is a classic of the genre.

    And what was so valuable at these facilities during non-working hours? The noble gentlemen have already left.
    1. -4
      26 March 2024 07: 05
      In
      +1
      The pieces of paper were apparently guarded as important, from the point of view of such
  22. +1
    25 March 2024 22: 49
    Quote from JÜRGEN WEGNER
    If this is an armed guard and has a firearm at his disposal, then yes.

    They had no weapons, except maybe a stick. Weapons are for internecine fighting, not for protecting people.
  23. -1
    25 March 2024 22: 51
    En France lors du Bataclan, entre le début de l'attaque et l'assaut il s'est écoulé...2h38mn !!!
  24. +1
    25 March 2024 23: 20
    Quote: carpenter
    Quote: ramzay21
    Should private security companies fight terrorists? What were the police officers doing in the next building?

    So what is a private security company needed for, to “row” money, they get more money than policemen, why does the country need them?


    What nonsense, security works for almost minimum wage. Even collection for the minimum wage works. There, salaries a couple of years ago were less than 30,000 in St. Petersburg. Where have you seen such salaries in the cops?
  25. +3
    25 March 2024 23: 25
    Quote: Neo-9947
    But if at least every 10th man had a bagpipe in his pocket, then these freaks would be put right there.
    And it’s even more likely that, knowing this situation, they wouldn’t have gone there.
    ============
    Now, of course, witnesses to the kitchen showdown will come running and explain that firearms cannot be sold for free...
    Fine. Let's go gradually.
    We will allow retired military personnel, judges, prosecutors, other security officials, and other “trusted” people to wear them. And let all potential terrorists know about this.


    And it will be like in America - 20,000 gun deaths a year and hundreds of cases of mass shootings in public places.
    Do you want to arrange a wild west? Or do you just love guns and want to have one, but don’t allow your dream to come true?
    1. -1
      25 March 2024 23: 34
      How many “gunshot” deaths have we had this year already? How long will it be? Only honestly. Without “statistics”, where deaths are listed according to different columns so as not to disturb the picture. Only a free person has the right to have weapons. A slave is not entitled to it.
  26. 0
    25 March 2024 23: 31
    By the way, this is a very serious topic. In my opinion, in principle there cannot be any private security companies for normal security. This should be done by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and other special services. That is, those who are from the state, and not from the “owner”. The private security company should guard small shops, etc. Catch thieves, cut down hooligans, move grandmothers across the road. No more.
  27. -3
    26 March 2024 00: 28
    I imagine a shooting match in Crocus. Right among the rushing spectators! The only way to avoid such terrorist attacks is to exclude mass events. It's wartime, and crowds are the goal.
    1. 0
      26 March 2024 16: 59
      Quote: bbss
      I imagine a shooting match in Crocus. Right among the rushing spectators! The only way to avoid such terrorist attacks is to exclude mass events. It's wartime, and crowds are the goal.

      ===
      You don’t have any idea, just watch the videos. they could have been met already at the entrance, as the bandits began shooting even in front of the doors
  28. -2
    26 March 2024 00: 45
    we need to slowly carry out a rotation, replacing the guards with members of our team
  29. -2
    26 March 2024 02: 52
    Almost all private security companies belong to employees of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and an agreement with them is something like a fee.
    If we approach the issue of choppers from the standpoint of usefulness, then the bulk of them are absolutely useless. Well, the law requires their use...
    Anyone understands that four attackers is still not much and the presence of several motivated and, most importantly, armed guards could change everything.
    In my opinion, it is almost impossible to prevent such cases and it is necessary to completely change the attitude of the state and the law towards armed citizens.
  30. -1
    26 March 2024 03: 34
    Quote: old rats
    You contemptuously call the people who are obliged to protect you “policemen.”

    The police are the ones who kick women in the stomach at demonstrations.
    1. 0
      26 March 2024 06: 09
      - Uncle traffic cop, is it true that you are a policeman?
      - really boy, what's the matter?
      - Uncle, why did you shoot our partisans?

      The people's militia was, and the police are closer to business and oppression.
  31. +2
    26 March 2024 04: 21
    It’s all empty. There are a lot of other places where you can’t squeeze in. You can’t put a machine gun at every point. And judging by the salary of a private security officer, then few people agree to fight with IZH against AK.
  32. 0
    26 March 2024 04: 56
    I think the situation can be changed if, at the same time as purchasing a ticket, citizens purchase short-term insurance for a round sum, and the insurer will be responsible for protecting the event.
  33. -1
    26 March 2024 06: 07
    There is a private security company, but there is no State Bureau of Investigation. And it’s a pain to give them weapons. So they’re on duty with a cucumber and a baton.
  34. +3
    26 March 2024 06: 35
    Case from practice: The object is a building in which there are only two chains of stores, divided by floors between them. Security by different private security companies. At night, glass breaks. The RBI of the first network were the first to rush in, inspected their facility, everything was intact. The window of the second chain was broken. At the same time, someone saw the private security company... The kids drove in in a car... But the private security company just stood there. The private security company of the second network rushed in, and the first ones stupidly passed on the information to them. Naturally, the culprits have already dumped and abandoned the car without documents in the yards. To my question to the first arrivals why they were not detained, the answer was: On what basis? We have everything intact. If they had detained, God forbid, one of the children complained about their health... Excess of authority, even to the point of considering the issue of deprivation of a license.
    1. +1
      27 March 2024 20: 59
      This is exactly what happens. They tied their hands and feet with bans, and now they demand heroism.
  35. 0
    26 March 2024 07: 45
    registered weapons are an additional payment for security. if there are no weapons, many times less. But where do they keep it when they need it? The question is?
  36. -1
    26 March 2024 08: 05
    Registered and then what? No one will give the private security company machine guns, and farts against AKMs are as good as pellets against an elephant. Even if the private security company was armed with machine guns, they would simply be crushed at the entrance, without even having time to squeak. Only in the movies there is Die Hard and he kills everyone.
    Deputies need to go to the front, they are tired of being smart after a fight. If a terrorist attack is not prevented at the preparation stage, then the maximum that can be done is to reduce the number of victims, eliminate the consequences and destroy all those involved. It is necessary to establish at the legal level: all those involved must be destroyed, regardless of their tenure and position. The CIA director should know: gave the command to attack, buy a coffin.
    1. -1
      26 March 2024 09: 34
      these devils didn’t even clean the machines, apparently they didn’t recognize
      They wouldn’t crush anyone armed and prepared
  37. +2
    26 March 2024 08: 44
    How many such crocuses are there in Russia? Azerbaijanis buy everything in a row
  38. +1
    26 March 2024 09: 22
    Not only are the guards prohibited from using weapons, but even if they were hit with a baton, they are threatened with a prosecutor’s investigation. And if, God forbid, you put on handcuffs, you could end up in jail. Many stores refuse the services of security guards and hire store managers. Guys walk around and make sure they don't steal. If he sees a mess, he can give it to the scoreboard and no one will do anything to him, he is not a security guard, he is not bound hand and foot by instructions and laws. Moreover, he should be rewarded because he detained the thief. Such cases are often shown in criminal chronicles.
    Banks refuse armed security, because if you shoot a robber, they will torture you with checks, and why pay extra money for a weapon.
  39. +1
    26 March 2024 10: 14
    Quote from: dmi.pris1
    How is Security different from Protection? So that nothing is stolen? Then it’s watchmen

    guardia is Italian for “guard, protection,” so it’s no different.
    The Guard hi
  40. +2
    26 March 2024 10: 28
    Quote: Volunteer Marek
    By the way, this is a very serious topic. In my opinion, in principle there cannot be any private security companies for normal security. This should be done by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and other special services. That is, those who are from the state, and not from the “owner”. The private security company should guard small shops, etc. Catch thieves, cut down hooligans, move grandmothers across the road. No more.

    Do we have capitalism or what? laughing The owner protects his property by all available means, this collective farm where everyone around is equal, and there is nothing special to take from anyone, is over. And for a long time.
    But the collective farm habits remained. Although the state in fact does not guarantee anything to anyone - I remember the reform of the Lord of Winter Time, when the Ministry of Internal Affairs was reduced, like, it was not needed.
    Well, what do you want? Protect yourself, as the rulers suggest, well, with your own actions. Both individually, such as the concept “my home is my fortress,” and through private security companies. But here, too, the collective farm thinking: pestles/revolvers are categorically prohibited, shotguns are also limited, judicial practice on the necessary defense is purely punitive in relation to the defender.
    Well, this is how we live. drinks
  41. 0
    26 March 2024 11: 40
    In the same building there is a fully staffed police department, it seems!

    This is from the official website of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation. Office of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the Krasnogorsk district. The police department of the Pavshino microdistrict controls order in the entrusted territory and helps Moscow residents solve problem situations within the framework of the law. Here you can write a statement if you witnessed a crime or suffered from the actions of a criminal. Employees recommend contacting them immediately, because the sooner they can begin an investigation, the greater the likelihood that the culprit will not escape responsibility, and you will be able to receive compensation.
    The organization is located at the address: Russia, Moscow region, Krasnogorsk, Mezhdunarodnaya street, 18 (near the Myakinino metro station). You can find out the necessary information by calling +7 (498) 568-93-10 or on the website 50.mvd.rf. The company's doors are open 24 hours a day.
    You realized that this is probably not the police department. This is a COMPANY!
    1. +1
      26 March 2024 12: 23
      Quote: Alex 22 22
      In the same building there is a fully staffed police department, it seems!

      This is from the official website of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation. Office of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the Krasnogorsk district. The police department of the Pavshino microdistrict controls order in the entrusted territory and helps Moscow residents solve problem situations within the framework of the law. Here you can write a statement if you witnessed a crime or suffered from the actions of a criminal. Employees recommend contacting them immediately, because the sooner they can begin an investigation, the greater the likelihood that the culprit will not escape responsibility, and you will be able to receive compensation.
      The organization is located at the address: Russia, Moscow region, Krasnogorsk, Mezhdunarodnaya street, 18 (near the Myakinino metro station). You can find out the necessary information by calling +7 (498) 568-93-10 or on the website 50.mvd.rf. The company's doors are open 24 hours a day.
      You realized that this is probably not the police department. This is a COMPANY!

      It's a waste of time to google - but judging by the style of what's written, you're lying hi To the extent that this is the official website of the Ministry of Internal Affairs.
      And for what purpose are you lying, I’m curious? I’m embarrassed to ask - why did you put the word “company” in caps, out of hatred for some social group or other base motives?
      1. 0
        26 March 2024 14: 50
        Quote: hhurik
        And for what purpose are you lying, I’m curious? I’m embarrassed to ask - why did you put the word “company” in caps, out of hatred for some social group or other base motives?

        By the way, yesterday he already wrote about this same “company” and this same “official website of the Ministry of Internal Affairs”. Then that article was trashed along with all the comments. But the guy is persistent, apparently.

        This is probably where he gets this nonsense about the “company” and the “official website” from: https://zoon.ru/msk/public_services/upravlenie_mvd_rossii_po_krasnogorskomu_rajonu_otdel_politsii_mikrorajona_pavshino/

        An ordinary reference aggregator site, they call any office a “company,” be it the Ministry of Internal Affairs, or a joint-stock company, or an individual entrepreneur.
  42. +1
    26 March 2024 21: 24
    The FSB should fight terrorism, not security guards.
  43. 0
    27 March 2024 00: 45
    Quote: Volunteer Marek
    How many “gunshot” deaths have we had this year already? How long will it be? Only honestly. Without “statistics”, where deaths are listed according to different columns so as not to disturb the picture. Only a free person has the right to have weapons. A slave is not entitled to it.


    It is immediately obvious that you are from the sect of the estrus on trunks. Always the same quotes.
  44. +1
    27 March 2024 07: 09
    you better tell me how many taxes this crocus paid to the budget))) that’s where the loaf will be eden
  45. 0
    27 March 2024 20: 04
    In general, the security of sports, cultural and other public events by private security companies does not require the security guards to have service weapons. In other words, it is prohibited.