The long reign and tragic end of Nicolae Ceausescu

32
The long reign and tragic end of Nicolae Ceausescu

This ruler was quite mediocre, and in the last years of his reign - an openly weak politician, but this did not prevent him from remaining in power for 24 long years. During this time, Romania moved from economic growth to a regime of austerity, and in foreign policy it quarreled with everyone who could become its friend and ally. All this led to a completely logical result.

What was Nicolae Ceausescu like? Thanks to what, a person from a simple peasant family was able to reach the heights of power, how he managed it and why he ended up so sadly, we will tell you.



Youth


The future Romanian dictator was born in January 1918 into a poor peasant family and was the third of 10 children. At the age of 11, Ceausescu moved from his native village to Bucharest with his older sister, where he worked part-time at a factory and became an apprentice and then an apprentice shoemaker.

Since the teenager’s earnings were more than modest, young Ceausescu began to resort to petty theft. He was caught in one of them, and that’s how 15-year-old Nicolae ended up in prison for the first time. The prison experience greatly influenced him and actually predetermined his future fate. In prison, he met prominent figures of the communist movement, including the future Romanian leader Gheorghiu Deja, and also joined the Communist Youth League (CYU) of Romania.


15-year-old Ceausescu during his first arrest, 1933

In the second half of the 1930s, Ceausescu was arrested several times, but only for participation in strikes and propaganda work. In prison, like many other prisoners, he was tortured, as a result of which he began to stutter.

General Stefan Kostial, who knew him in those years, spoke of him like this:

“Ceausescu was a narrow-minded communist enthusiast who himself believed in the nonsense he preached. It looked quite strange, and therefore most of the prisoners avoided him.”

In 1936, Ceausescu joined the Romanian Communist Party. In 1940, he was once again arrested for propaganda activities and spent almost the entire Second World War in prisons and concentration camps. He was released only after the fall of the Antonescu regime in 1944. Since the communists came to power in Romania, Ceausescu's career skyrocketed thanks to his acquaintance with influential underground fighters who now occupied government positions.

In the late 1940s and early 1950s, Romania undergoes forced collectivization, which was met with hostility by most peasants. Once, encountering peasant disobedience in the Dambovita district, Ceausescu gave the order to open fire on unarmed people.

Thanks to friendly relations with Gheorghiu Dej, who led the country in 1947, Ceausescu became a member of the party's Central Committee in 1952, and a member of the Politburo in 1955. He holds the position of Deputy Minister of Defense and becomes a general, although he never served in the army. By the end of the 1950s, he effectively became the second man in the state.


Gheorghiu-Dej, Khrushchev and Ceausescu at Bucharest airport before the 1960th Congress of the RWP, XNUMX

After the death of Gheorghiu-Deja from cancer in March 1965, Ceausescu was elected first secretary of the Central Committee, heading the party and state. The choice fell on him because he was considered a compromise figure; his colleagues did not rate his political abilities highly, so they hoped that he would become an obedient puppet in their hands.

In power


However, having come to power, Ceausescu did not intend to be an obedient tool in the hands of other party members. In the very first months, he appointed people loyal to himself to key positions in the country. Then, one by one, he removed from power representatives of the “old guard”, associates of Georgiu-Dej. The formal reason was their accusation of “immoral behavior" Gheorghiu-Dej himself, his friend and patron, thanks to whom Ceausescu made his career, now began to be criticized, and those repressed during his reign received freedom.


Ceausescu at the time of coming to power, 1965

In the early years, the Ceausescu regime was relatively mild. Thus, residents of the country had the opportunity to buy foreign press, the freedom of press of the Romanian press was higher than in other countries of the socialist camp. Citizens were able to freely enter and leave the country, and dissidents were no longer sent to concentration camps, giving them more lenient punishments.

In foreign policy, Ceausescu showed himself to be a peacemaker. For example, in 1968, he condemned the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia, saying that it was a big mistake, and during the Sino-Soviet conflict on Damansky Island, he took neutrality, not supporting either side.


Ceausescu's speech at a rally against the entry of Soviet troops into Czechoslovakia in Bucharest, 1968

However, such liberalization did not last long. In 1971, Ceausescu made a series of visits to Asian countries - China, North Korea, Vietnam and others. In North Korea, he became interested in the Juche idea and the cult of personality of Kim Il Sung. Ceausescu decided to arrange something similar in Romania.

A turn towards totalitarianism began. In the same year, censorship was significantly tightened and propaganda praising the merits of “greatest son of the Romanian people" The Ceausescu personality cult began. Helpful propagandists attributed to him all the real and imaginary achievements of the country; in the press he was called “titan of thought”, “favorite son of the nation”, “hero of heroes”, “genius of the Carpathians”, “full-flowing Danube of reason” and other epithets of the like. Ceausescu did not tolerate criticism and, probably, he himself believed in his unusual genius. When an American journalist asked him how he felt about his cult of personality, Ceausescu replied calmly:

“In every country there are figures who, through their deeds for the benefit of the people, deserve universal respect.”


Propaganda poster in Bucharest, 1986

In addition, the “hero of heroes” also had a clear inferiority complex due to his height of 165 cm. All photographers and television workers in the country were ordered not to photograph Ceausescu standing next to tall people; compliance with this rule was strictly controlled.

Next, Ceausescu decided to gain full control over the citizens of Romania and completely eradicate any dissent. The state security agency Securitate began to play a major role, expanding more and more every year and gaining greater powers. Everyone who could speak out against the regime, who was dissatisfied with its actions and spoke out openly, soon found themselves in prison.

In governing the country, Ceausescu relied more and more on his relatives. In fact, the second person in the country was his wife Elena, who had a 4th grade education. She was elected academician, headed the Institute of Chemical Research, her name was put under the scientific works of the scientists of this institute, and propaganda called her “world famous scientists" But this will seem like a trifle if we remember that during the reign of Ceausescu, the Romanian Academy of Sciences seriously put forward the theory that modern Romanians are direct descendants of the ancient Romans.

Ceausescu's son Nicu, who was popularly called the prince, soon began to play a significant role in politics. He held a number of government positions, but is best remembered for his drunken sprees and related incidents. Daughter Zoya is remembered for her love affairs. And only the eldest son Valentin, who became a nuclear physicist, was a completely decent person, but he was not interested in politics and did not hold any positions.

In total, about 40 relatives of the dictator, who were popularly called the Ceausescu clan, received government positions.

Ceausescu himself and his family members were partial to luxury. He had 21 palaces, 41 residences, 20 hunting lodges.


Ceausescu receives the presidential scepter from the hands of the President of the Grand National Assembly, Stefan Wojtek, 1974

The population of Romania during his reign was forced to tighten their belts every year. The 1970s saw economic growth, but it was driven by loans from Western countries. Soon the loans had to be repaid, and then a number of restrictions were imposed on the population of Romania, and total savings began on literally everything. The issuance of food using cards was introduced, the sale of gasoline using coupons, television broadcast only two hours a day. In winter, it was forbidden to use refrigerators, it was forbidden to use gas to heat apartments, and at night it was allowed to light no more than one light bulb in houses (and its power should not exceed 15 W). Any violation of these prohibitions was punishable by heavy fines. Thousands of beggars appeared in Bucharest and other cities of the country.


Meeting of Ceausescu with the President of the Central African Republic J.B. Bokassa, 1972

Ceausescu stubbornly refused to admit the failure of his own economic policy and blamed all the failures on his ministers, including Prime Minister Verdetz, who were immediately removed from their posts. But all this did not correct the situation, the people were driven to despair by poverty, and only a spark was needed for their discontent to explode. And soon this spark flared up.

Revolution


The Romanian people have expressed dissatisfaction with the Ceausescu regime since the 1970s. When the retirement age was raised in 1977, mass miners' strikes began, in which more than 35 thousand people took part. However, their protest was suppressed.

In the 1980s, new strikes of miners and workers of large factories swept across the country one after another, and in 1987 there was an uprising in the city of Brasov, suppressed by the authorities.

Added to the unstable internal situation were failures in foreign policy: by the mid-1980s, Romania’s relations with both the USSR and the West had deteriorated significantly. US President George H. W. Bush later recalled:

“For a certain period of time, we treated Romania depending on its belligerence towards Russia. But Ceausescu opposed Russia, and then we said that he was our man. Later, after we saw that we were dealing with an oligarch who controls everything... we changed our position.”

In this situation, Ceausescu refused to admit his own mistakes and begin any reforms. On the contrary, he decided with all his might to create the appearance of unprecedented popular support for his regime. Thus, in the 1985 parliamentary elections, the ruling Communist Party received 97,7% of the votes. However, these figures were far from the real state of affairs.


Ceausescu in Moscow at Brezhnev's funeral, 1982

And then December 1989 came. In the middle of the month, protests began in the western city of Timisoara against the eviction of a local Hungarian pastor. The protesting residents were soon joined by workers from nearby factories. On December 17, Ceausescu ordered Securitate state security forces and the army to open fire on protesters, killing more than 50 men, women and children. In the following days, use weapons continued, and the number of victims on both sides reached 1100 people.

However, the protest only grew. On December 21, Ceausescu ordered a large rally in his support in the center of Bucharest, to which the authorities brought about 100 thousand state employees.

When Ceausescu, being on the balcony of the palace, began to make a speech, a firecracker exploded in the crowd. Ceausescu fell silent in bewilderment. Following this, shouts were heard from the crowd, “Down with the tyrant!" and "Down with communism!" Unaccustomed to speaking in front of a hostile crowd, the dictator quickly left the balcony.

Meanwhile, clashes between protesters and the army and the Securitate began in the square, shooting rang out, and Tanks. The army began to go over to the side of the people.


Clashes in Bucharest, December 1989

Seeing all this, Ceausescu, his wife Elena and several guards fled by helicopter from the roof of the palace surrounded by a crowd.

On December 22, it became known about the sudden death of Defense Minister Vasile Mil. A version immediately spread among the people that he was killed on the orders of Ceausescu because he refused to shoot at the protesters. By that time, the rebels had taken the presidential palace, the television center and other important facilities in the capital. The overthrow of Ceausescu was announced on television.


Armed clashes in Bucharest, December 1989

Under threat of being shot down, Ceausescu's own helicopter was landed in a field near the city of Targovishte, 75 km from Bucharest. Its pilot immediately went over to the side of the rebels, and the Ceausescu couple, while trying to escape, were arrested by the army.

On December 25, their trial took place, lasting just over two hours. The couple were charged under four articles of the Romanian Criminal Code: article 145 (destruction of the national economy), article 163 (armed action against the people and the state), article 165 (destruction of state institutions) and article 356 (genocide). They were found guilty on all counts and sentenced to death. On the same day they were shot in the courtyard of the soldiers' barracks.

So the Romanian Revolution, which lasted only 9 days, ended in complete victory.
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    27 March 2024 04: 55
    In order to pay off the national debt, the slogan “Everything is for export” was put forward in Romania, as a result of which store shelves were empty and a card system was introduced. Nevertheless, using such tough measures, the “Genius of the Carpathians” completely paid off its external debt. For some reason, the Author did not cover the topic of Albanian-Romanian relations, where the same dictator sat, and maybe even worse than Ceausescu
    1. +6
      27 March 2024 05: 05
      On the same day they were shot in the courtyard of the soldiers' barracks.
      A strong warning for all dictators....
      1. -2
        27 March 2024 06: 10
        Quote: Igor Irtenev

        To the death of a hero

        Why did Ceausescu be killed?
        After all, he is not to blame for anything,
        He was treated too harshly
        Pointing the machine gun at the stomach.

        The image of an innocent victim is pure
        Etched into our hearts forever.
        As befits a communist,
        He stayed with them until the end.

        The ranks of heroes have thinned
        Within a matter of weeks.
        Friends, I'm scared for Fidel,
        Tell me, are you still alive, Fidel?

        I can't live without seduxen
        In the alarming darkness, close your eyes,
        I represent Kim Il Sung
        In the bloody clutches of the executioners.

        Heroes don't choose death
        And I’m a poet—consider me a hero.
        Poets die too
        Not the way you want sometimes.

        But if it's my turn,
        Then I would solve the question this way:
        If you die like Stalin,
        And live like Ceausescu lived.

        1989
  2. +10
    27 March 2024 04: 57
    Y el tío Gorbachov no tuvo nada que ver?

    No sé si Nicolae era un buen comunista, pero me resulta demasiado simplón este artículo...

    Fuente Wikipedia???

    ......

    And Uncle Gorbachev has nothing to do with this?

    I don't know if Nicolae was a good communist, but I find this article too simple...

    Wikipedia source???
    1. -2
      27 March 2024 09: 13
      This article does not explain why, according to polls, 50% of Romanians now believe that life was better under the communists.

      In Russia, this is explained really simply: “everyone who lived then is simply stupid, and today’s people are smart”... It’s just not clear why, given such heredity, they became wiser... laughing

      People really change.There used to be a Russian proverb: “simplicity is worse than theft.” And now they say that “the simpler the better.”
      1. +5
        27 March 2024 20: 54
        Quote: ivan2022
        This article does not explain why, according to polls, 50% of Romanians now believe that life was better under the communists.

        I very much doubt that today Romanians will exchange their standard of living and membership in the EU and NATO for the past under Ceausescu.
        1. +1
          27 March 2024 21: 13
          What joy ordinary people in Europe get from NATO is a highly controversial issue, but according to data from INSCOP or Open democraсy agencies Especially if they turned out to be approximately 59/50 in all countries of the former CMEA - I have no doubt...
        2. 0
          27 March 2024 23: 16
          Romanians will exchange their standard of living
          With a salary of 700-800 euros, prices there are only slightly (10-15%) lower than in England. By the way, Brasov was (in 1950-60) the Romanian Stalingrad - it was called Orasul Stalin.
          1. +1
            28 March 2024 06: 16
            Quote: Bolt Cutter
            With a salary of 700-800 euros

            All that remains is to compare it with 70-80 years and everything falls into place.
  3. -3
    27 March 2024 05: 59
    During the reign of Ceausescu, the Romanian Academy of Sciences seriously put forward the theory that modern Romanians are direct descendants of the ancient Romans
    During the Roman Empire, Romania was the most remote province where thieves and prostitutes were exiled by court verdict.
    1. +2
      27 March 2024 19: 17
      During the Roman Empire, Romania was
      There was no Romania - there was the province of Dacia, annexed by Trajan. Modern Romanians, however, look at this adequately; they say that the Romans brought civilization and experience of statehood to their ancestors, much like Russian Normanists talk about the Scandinavians.
      1. 0
        27 March 2024 19: 22
        Quote: Bolt Cutter
        There was no Romania - there was the province of Dacia, annexed by Trajan.

        The names change, the territory remains. By the way, Dacia was named after the Dacian tribe, whom the Romans genocided to zero in the process of annexing the province. The process, by the way, is proudly reflected on the Trajan Monument.
        1. +3
          27 March 2024 19: 29
          genocide to zero.
          Not at zero - there were quite a lot of them left, they were later recruited into the auxiliary legions.
          Names change, territory remains
          The modern USA is not at all the land of the Pawnees, Cherokees and other Orapahos. The territory itself is a faceless entity.
          In the Museum of Communism in Brasov, in addition to an exhibition of antiques from Soviet times, there are printed testimonies of the terrible horrors of life under communism. 4 out of 5 pieces of evidence are quotes from a book by a dissident who fled to Germany, and a couple more are from the memoirs of a doctor who dealt in illegal abortions, who stole medicines for his “business” and complained about their shortage. Something like this.
          These are the horrors (pictured) the Romanians had under hated socialism belay . My grandmother had a refrigerator like this (I hid ice cream in it when I was in first grade) and it still works, by the way. And I still have Soviet popular filmstrips for children.
  4. +3
    27 March 2024 06: 18
    Article 163 (armed action against the people and the state), Article 165 (destruction of state institutions)

    I saw something similar somewhere
    It’s a pity the army did not come out in support of the constitutional order sad
    1. +1
      27 March 2024 21: 23
      She did not come out in support of order among us either. For example, in the Russian Federation, the military oath of 1992 contained the words of an oath about not using weapons against authorities. And after that, in October 1993, the daring tank crews shot the All-Russian Congress of People's Deputies....

      Whether Romania or Russia, the idea of ​​legality here is highly conventional.
      1. 0
        April 22 2024 07: 27
        Well, how come I didn’t perform) 1962. June 1-2. Novocherkassk. Quite a lot of analogies with Romania
  5. 0
    27 March 2024 06: 20
    Quote: Nagan
    During the reign of Ceausescu, the Romanian Academy of Sciences seriously put forward the theory that modern Romanians are direct descendants of the ancient Romans
    During the Roman Empire, Romania was the most remote province where thieves and prostitutes were exiled by court verdict.

    It was also the last province to be annexed to the Roman Empire.
    1. -1
      27 March 2024 07: 35
      And its name comes from the word Rome.
  6. +6
    27 March 2024 07: 02
    For example, in 1968 he condemned the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia

    And what, the Soviet communists were obliged to give Czechoslovakia to their enemies? And according to this charge against Ceausescu, Yeltsin should also have been executed for the bloody massacre in Moscow in October 1993, when people were killed in and around the White House, including children. And Nicholas II for numerous shootings of rallies.
    But the enemies of the USSR always have double standards in everything.
  7. +5
    27 March 2024 08: 46
    And Romania “like the one that became free from the communist yoke,” and Poland and the GDR, and Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia... USSR....

    It is not clear, however, from which specific country this “yoke” came. Probably the yoke was simply from the book of Marx, written in the 19th century..... Anything can happen in life!

    Understood.

    And the fact that he and his wife were shot 2 hours after the “trial in the barracks” is normal, he was so bad......

    But I have already read somewhere before that during the 24 years of his reign he “quarreled with everyone and brought the economy to a decline.” I just remember that this is definitely not about us
    1. 0
      April 1 2024 16: 08
      It's very clear. Bukovina, as a result of the Second World War, was torn away from Romania and became part of the Ukrainian SSR, and then independent Ukraine. The beneficiary is thus established through simple logical conclusions.
  8. +12
    27 March 2024 09: 46
    You can't leave a person in power for too long. Power changes and spoils a person. There are exceptions, of course, and these are strong people. The best option is 2 terms. Different countries may have different deadlines. And those in power (and after) must necessarily report on their income. To have, like Ceausescu, dozens of palaces and hunting lodges……. Brad. And most importantly, the law must be the same for everyone.
    1. +3
      27 March 2024 19: 19
      Have, like Ceausescu, dozens of palaces and hunting lodges
      More precisely, all this real estate belonged to the state; he simply used it. He did not have villas in Miami or Cannes.
      1. 0
        27 March 2024 20: 37
        I understand that this was probably true. But the article says: He had……. .
  9. +5
    27 March 2024 12: 10
    in 1968 he condemned the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia
    The USSR invaded wherever it could, and the USA and Western countries carried the torch of democracy in Vietnam, Cuba, the Dominican Republic...
  10. +1
    27 March 2024 12: 41
    They write that he awarded his dog the rank of colonel.
  11. +6
    27 March 2024 15: 41
    When the retirement age was raised in 1977, mass miners' strikes began, in which more than 35 thousand people took part.

    Thus, in the 1985 parliamentary elections, the ruling Communist Party received 97,7% of the votes. However, these figures were far from the real state of affairs.

    So the Romanian Revolution, which lasted only 9 days, ended in complete victory.

    What, however, an instructive story... You will inevitably think about the evil fate that haunts those who want to rule forever... crying
  12. +7
    27 March 2024 16: 44
    Eduard Limonov has such a good book “The Murder of a Sentinel” (Citizen’s Diary) there is a chapter “Elena and Nicolae” about the kidnapping, shameful trial and criminal execution of spouses ..
    "Elena and Nicolae Ceausescu forever joined the immortal love couples of world history." //Eduard Limonov//
  13. +2
    28 March 2024 15: 20
    This ruler was quite mediocre, and in the last years of his reign - an openly weak politician, but this did not prevent him from remaining in power for 24 long years. During this time, Romania moved from economic growth to a regime of austerity, and in foreign policy it quarreled with everyone who could become its friend and ally. All this led to a completely logical result.

    Well, wow, I have really strong deja vu!!!
    1. +1
      3 May 2024 16: 57
      Well, wow, I have really strong deja vu!!!

      And it will last for a long time, alas. request
  14. +2
    April 1 2024 16: 40
    What’s the point of once again reprinting propaganda from the spark of the late 80s? no serious analysis, no study of the material
    1. 0
      April 8 2024 13: 07
      Prove that this article contains at least one phrase from Ogonyok of the 80s! Did you want to read that this “great” ruler ruled well and eventually became a “victim of the American imperialists”? So for such texts it’s definitely not for me.