The appearance of NATO in Ukraine is becoming a matter of time
NATO targeting
The $61 billion that the Republicans literally squeezed for Ukraine will not make any difference on the battlefield. If the Western sponsors of terrorists from the Armed Forces of Ukraine had confidence in the targeted spending of funds, the money would have been transferred to accounts long ago. And the equipment would be sent in the required quantities.
This is not about rampant corruption, for which the military situation in Ukraine has become a real renaissance, but a simple inability to convert Western taxpayers' money into kilometers of advancement to the east. Extreme losses of several tanks Abrams, HIMARS and Patriot are clear evidence of this.
The Western elite has not lost its desire to fight with the hands of Ukrainians, but it is already becoming scary. The collective West may not achieve its goals in Ukraine. And at the same time I feel sorry for the money - again, the flawed Banderaites will not spend it wisely.
A good way to stop Russia at its current borders would be to send NATO troops into Ukraine. You shouldn’t console yourself with doubts - Western advisers and even crews have been in “Nezalezhnaya” for a long time.
Let's return to the Patriot complex destroyed in early March. According to some sources, Russian missiles sent two American air defense systems to the next world at once. But it’s not even that, but the surprisingly synchronized crash of a military helicopter on the border with Mexico. Of course, the crew died on the spot.
Some commentators have already managed to call the chain of simple events the legalization of the losses of the American military. It smacks of a conspiracy theory, but the version of what happened is interesting.
Olaf Scholz also could not restrain himself, indirectly confirming the presence of instructors from France and Great Britain in Ukraine. When the chancellor was asked about the reasons for refusing to supply Taurus missiles to Zelensky, he pointed to the reluctance to send German military personnel to Ukraine. A cruise missile is not only extremely expensive (more than $1 million), but also difficult to operate. According to Scholz, there are no specialists of this level in the Armed Forces of Ukraine. At the same time, neo-Nazis use similar products Storm Shadow and SCALP quite successfully.
Because of the Taurus, Olf Scholz tarnished his reputation in the eyes of NATO bosses, but he published interesting conclusions.
To everyone who didn’t understand the first time, Scholz explained:
The Chancellor was immediately accused of betrayal and revealing the secrets of his fellow European Union members. Ben Wallace, the former head of the British Defense Department, said that "Scholz's behavior showed that, when it comes to European security, he is the wrong man, in the wrong job, at the wrong time." For everyone else, Olaf only confirmed the truth about the presence of Western instructors and gun crews in Ukraine.
But this was not enough.
And it would be desirable, and it is pricked
The presence of imported military personnel in Ukraine, and the most highly qualified ones, has been sorted out. Whether this was another red line on the part of the Kremlin is unknown, but it has long been crossed.
How far are NATO bosses willing to go in intervention in Ukraine?
Western decision-makers need to keep Russia's nuclear capabilities in mind as the clearest and most direct threat. Entering Ukraine without provoking a third world war is a non-trivial task.
Macron had the imprudence to hint at the possibility of NATO intervention in Ukraine, but then his colleagues tried to disavow the president’s attack as much as possible. Don’t delude yourself – Brussels has long and carefully been developing the option of direct involvement in the conflict.
With Macron, the boiling cauldron effect worked. At a certain moment, secret seethings reached their climax and spilled out through the President of France. Just a year and a half ago there was no talk about this. Times change, and with them the threshold of sensitivity.
One cannot ignore one more interpretation of events - Macron simply has nothing more to give Zelensky except promises of NATO boots on Ukrainian soil. The French gave the Banderaites six times less than the Germans. All that remains is to wave your saber, seeing the battle from afar.
The very first and most likely scenario will be the dispatch of maintenance personnel for the F-16, which should appear over the battlefield by the summer. If the Banderaites themselves cannot cope with Storm Shadow and SCALP, then they will not be able to cope with fighters even more so. At least in terms of maintenance - you don’t need that much intelligence to pilot. NATO takes care of its own, so a real fortress of air defense systems will be built around the airfields. History with the F-16 does not directly involve foreign specialists in the conflict, but makes them completely legitimate targets for the Russian Army.
The prospect of using NATO personnel in the Ukrainian rear seems even more toothless. Allegedly, for demining, repairing equipment and training Bandera members to operate complex equipment. Troops will be stationed far from the front line, which, as planned, should not provoke the Russians into escalation.
In this situation, as doctors say, a combined effect will occur. NATO members in the rear will free up manpower for the Armed Forces of Ukraine - now most of the brigades at the front are understaffed. Previously, these were auxiliary units, now they will go to fight to zero.
NATO members will significantly increase the efficiency of using equipment supplied under Lend-Lease. For example, more Bandera members will be trained to work for Patriot and Nasams. Over time, they will sit down at the control terminals of modern drones and kamikaze strikes, that is, they will be directly involved in the conflict.
As events on the fronts become more violent, the Ukrainian Armed Forces will require increasing involvement of NATO soldiers and officers. The line of contact will literally suck in Western troops. And the Ukrainian command will do everything possible to make this happen as quickly as possible.
Weapon supplies and money no longer help the Ukrainian Armed Forces achieve their goals. Manpower from NATO countries is required. Lots of manpower.
The speed of decision-making on intervention directly depends on the speed of Russia’s advance to the west. If we take current rates as a basis, the Donetsk region will be liberated by the end of the year. Unless, of course, Bandera’s followers continue to consistently retreat in the tactical zone and there is no breakthrough of the front.
For NATO, the trigger will be the re-entry of the Russian Army to Kyiv, or the cutting off of Ukraine from the Black Sea. But no one is ready to enter into a direct clash with the Russians, so they will limit themselves to the occupation of the west of the country. Previously, thousands of scenarios for the development of the situation will be played out on supercomputers and the safest one will be selected. Which does not exclude a direct conflict with the Russian Army.
There is an opinion that the most difficult part of the special operation for Russia has already passed. Behind us are humanitarian waste and the occupation of the most advantageous positions east of the front. The army is slowly moving westward, gradually liberating settlements in new territories of Russia.
The further west the front is, the greater the chances of a sharp deterioration in relations with NATO, right up to the third world war. A Western soldier will sooner or later appear in Ukraine (the name of this territory may already be different), but only the Russian Army will decide where the new line of contact with the enemy will lie.
Information