The role of Umberto Nobile and Felice Troiani in the development of Soviet-Italian cooperation in the field of airship construction

71
The role of Umberto Nobile and Felice Troiani in the development of Soviet-Italian cooperation in the field of airship construction

The fascists' coming to power in October 1922 did not at all become an obstacle to the development of relations between Italy and the USSR. A week after his appointment as Prime Minister, on November 6, 1922, Benito Mussolini informed the Soviet representative in Italy V.V. Vorovsky about his readiness to establish diplomatic relations between the countries, and on February 7, 1924, notes were exchanged on Italy’s recognition of the government of the USSR [2] .

After the establishment of diplomatic relations between the countries, the Duce proposed concluding a Soviet-Italian treaty of non-aggression and neutrality, but soon postponed negotiations, fearing complications with other powers.



“Mussolini’s anti-Bolshevism […], according to him, was directed in the 20s almost exclusively against the internal enemy, i.e. the leftist movement in Italy” [3],

– points out historian I. A. Hormach.

In the field of economics, the mutual interest of Italy and the Soviet Union was obvious, since the need of the Italian market for Soviet raw materials, and the Soviet market for Italian industrial products, was very great. The fact that in 1926–1927 is eloquent. fuel oil for the Italian military fleet was supplied only from the USSR [2].

In the second half of 1927, speaking at a session of the Central Executive Committee on December 10, 1928, M. M. Litvinov described Soviet-Italian relations “as an example of correctness, despite the differences in socio-economic systems”. The Italian leadership was also satisfied with them. The General Secretary of the Fascist Party, R. Farinacci, wrote: “Moscow and Rome are now two poles of the struggle for the political and social revolution of future generations. This struggle must remain purely ideological.”

Despite serious ideological differences, during this period relations between the Soviet Union and fascist Italy were based on close economic cooperation, including in the field aviation. In particular, story airship construction in the USSR is inseparable from the contribution of engineers officially invited from Italy, who imported technology to the USSR [4].

Umberto Nobile and Felice Troiani had a significant influence on the development of this industry in the Soviet Union.

The crash of the airship "Italy" and the rescue of its crew


Umberto Nobile (1885–1978) Italian airship builder, Arctic explorer, general (1926). Two flights to the Arctic - in 1926 and 1928 - brought Nobile worldwide fame. In April-May 1926, the airship, named "Norway", made its famous flight, first from Italy to Spitsbergen with stops in Britain, Norway and Leningrad, and then without landing through the North Pole to Alaska. And in May 1928, this ship, named “Italy,” made several flights to the polar regions from a base on Spitsbergen. In the last of them, he reached the North Pole and, without landing, headed back. However, due to strong winds, the airship veered off course and crashed.
Umberto Nobile (1885–1978) Italian airship builder, Arctic explorer, general (1926). Two flights to the Arctic - in 1926 and 1928 - brought Nobile worldwide fame. In April-May 1926, the airship, named "Norway", made its famous flight, first from Italy to Spitsbergen with stops in Britain, Norway and Leningrad, and then without landing through the North Pole to Alaska. And in May 1928, this ship, named “Italy,” made several flights to the polar regions from a base on Spitsbergen. In the last of them, he reached the North Pole and, without landing, headed back. However, due to strong winds, the airship veered off course and crashed.

An important role in strengthening ties between Italy and the Soviet Union was played by the USSR's rescue of the crew members of the airship Italia, which crashed in the Arctic Ocean. It’s worth talking about this in a little more detail.

As you know, the government of Benito Mussolini sought to strengthen the glory of Italian aeronautics, and therefore attached great importance to the expedition on the airship “Italia”. The ceremonial departure took place on April 15, 1928, all Italian newspapers applauded this event, but on May 25 the airship crashed about 100 km from the island of North-East Land (Spitsbergen archipelago) [1].

From the impact on the ice, the control nacelle and the rear engine nacelle were torn off from the power structure of the airship and were thrown down, while the airship itself immediately rose into the air again and was carried away.

The crashed balloonists had to fight for survival for more than a month. Fortunately, among the wreckage they found some food supplies, a tent, which they painted red to attract attention, but most importantly, an emergency shortwave radio station. With its help, they tried to transmit distress signals and their coordinates, which were caught by the Soviet radio amateur Schmidt from the Arkhangelsk region [1].

Norwegian, Swedish and Italian planes headed to the search area. On June 20, the Italian pilot Umberto Maddalena, flying an S.55 seaplane, discovered the crash site and dropped a food cargo. On June 23, the Swedish pilot Lundborg landed on the ice and took the wounded Nobile out of the camp. However, during the second landing, the plane capped, and Lundborg himself became a prisoner of the “Red Tent”.

Initially, the USSR reacted somewhat coolly to the expedition of the airship “Italia”, since, according to some assumptions, Mussolini wanted to annex Franz Josef Land to his possessions. However, after the disaster, the icebreakers Malygin and Krasin were sent to the Spitsbergen area. Pilot B. G. Chukhnovsky from the Krasin discovered A. Mariano and F. Zappi, who, together with F. Malmgren, who died under unclear circumstances, having lost hope that they would be discovered, decided to walk to Spitsbergen. They, like those remaining at the “Red Tent,” were saved by “Krasin” [1].


The failure of the expedition marked the end of Nobile's career in Italy as an airship designer. In late autumn 1928, a commission of inquiry was created to investigate the causes of the crash, headed by Admiral Umberto Cagni [5]. The findings of the commission, published on March 4, 1929, were unfavorable for Nobile - the commission of inquiry accused him of the incorrect maneuver of the aircraft, which led to the tragedy, as well as the fact that he was the first to leave the scene of the crash on the Lundborg plane [4].

The N-4 Italia was the fourth in a series of semi-rigid airships built at the Aeronautical Structures Factory in Rome, headed by Umberto Nobile. "Italy" was built in 1927, the length of the airship was 105 meters.
The N-4 Italia was the fourth in a series of semi-rigid airships built at the Aeronautical Structures Factory in Rome, headed by Umberto Nobile. "Italy" was built in 1927, the length of the airship was 105,4 meters.]

However, the biggest problem was the international prestige of Italy, undermined as a result of the unsuccessful mission, which the country spared no expense in achieving. Because of this failure, the construction of airships in the country was stopped, and soon the Minister of Aviation Italo Balbo completely banned it.

Nobile was forced to complete his work. In these circumstances, he gratefully accepted the offer of Professor R. L. Samoilovich to take part in a journey to Franz Josef Land on board the icebreaker "Malygin" in order to shed light on the disappearance of "Italy" and the fate of six comrades (along with the airship, they were carried away a group of six people whose fate was unknown). However, bad weather conditions prevented the ship from approaching Alexandra Land, where, according to Nobile, he could find elements useful for the investigation [5].

Upon returning from the expedition, he received an offer from the Soviet side to head the design work at the Dirizhablestroy enterprise at the Dolgoprudnaya station (now the city of Dolgoprudny) as a designer and consultant on technical issues. Nobile agreed if the Italian government did not interfere with this [4].

Upon his return to Italy, Nobile presented a report on the proposal made to him to the secretary of the National Fascist Party, Giovanni Giurati, asking Mussolini's permission for this mission. Having received Jurati's consent and informed the Italian Ambassador to the USSR Bernardo Attolico, Nobile, however, faced opposition from Balbo. Nevertheless, Mussolini did not object to the departure of Nobile, whom he disliked, abroad and, among other things, allowed him to take to the USSR the drawings of airships of the Norge and Italia type [4].

In May 1932, Nobile arrived in Moscow, where he was accommodated in an apartment on the corner of Lubyanka and Myasnitskaya Street.

Activities of U. Nobile and F. Troiani in the USSR


Together with Nobile, the following went to the Dirigiblestroy: engineers Felice Troiani and Luigi Visocchi, draftsmen Nicola De Martino and Giacomo Garutti, as well as several workers. The Umberto Nobile Documentation Center in Vigna di Valle houses the contracts concluded by Dirigiblestroy with Nobile and his nine Italian employees [1].

Design engineer Felice Troiani (1897–1971) was quite an interesting person - it was he who designed the famous “red tent”. Much the opposite of Nobile, Troiani was also a member of the Italia expedition.

It should be said that if Nobile, by the time of his departure to the USSR, had already parted ways ideologically with the fascists, then Troiani, on the contrary, on the eve of his departure to the Soviet Union, joined the fascist party. The book of memoirs “What I Saw in Soviet Russia”, published in Italy in 1945, speaks about Nobile’s views. It shows the author's deep sympathy for the Soviet Union [4].

Troiani was quite skeptical about the USSR, which he wrote about in his autobiography entitled “The Tail of Minos” (not translated into Russian). Historian Polina Dyakonova notes that while Nobile plunged into the whirlpool of life in the Soviet capital with great enthusiasm, Troiani was extremely skeptical about Soviet methods of work. According to Troiani, Nobile’s enthusiasm was probably fueled by the hope of regaining his position in Russia, lost in Italy.

Covers of Felice Troiani's autobiographical novel The Tail of Minos
Covers of Felice Troiani's autobiographical novel The Tail of Minos

Soon Nobile began work, but it was seriously complicated by the lack of an organized technical base. The office of "Dirizhablestroy" changed its address four times.

In “Dirizhablestroy” it was necessary to start all over again, to create everything anew. Nobile took up the matter with the ardor of a southerner and the efficiency of a great specialist. At first, 80 young engineers, DUK graduates, worked under Nobile’s leadership. Such a large number of inexperienced engineers was even a hindrance in the work. It was hampered by staff turnover and the inability to rationalize the activities of the design bureau in our own way [6].

The official five-year plan was absolutely fantastic - following it, it was planned to build 58 semi-rigid and rigid airships. Here is what Nobile himself writes about this:

“When I noticed to the head of Dirigiblestroy that we in Italy and Zeppelin in Germany, even having excellent enterprise equipment and qualified personnel, could not fulfill 5/1 of this plan in 5 years, he objected: “What is impossible in capitalist countries, it is quite feasible in the USSR, where the pace can be increased as much as desired!”


But in the end, of course, it was not possible to carry out this plan.

The first airship designed by Nobile, which received the identification mark “USSR-B5” with a volume of 2 cubic meters. m, was built during September 340 – January 1932. Skilled Italian workers (1933-3 people), with the help of Soviet colleagues, performed a miracle. Working on old low-power machines, at zero temperature in the workshops, and resorting to ingenious tricks, they created metal structures in a few months [4].

The first Soviet semi-rigid airship B5 took to the skies on April 27, 1933. Photographs reveal its external resemblance to the Italian ship Mr with a volume of about 1 thousand cubic meters, which was produced at the SCA plant in 1924 - it remains to this day the smallest semi-rigid airship in the world and one of the smallest airships in general. It is possible that Mr served as the starting point for the B5 project, although there were noticeable differences in their designs [7].


The construction of the B-5 airship took place under difficult conditions. At the end of February 1933, Nobile suffered an acute attack of appendicitis, which turned into life-threatening peritonitis. He was urgently hospitalized in the Kremlin hospital and was able to return to work only in May. While Nobile was undergoing treatment, responsibility for B-5 passed completely to Troiani.

Due to the fact that the work was carried out slowly and with great difficulties, the head of Dirigiblestroy, Feldman, asked Troiani to give a description of each of the Italian workers who arrived with Nobile. The fact is that after a year from the beginning of the contract, only one experimental B-5 airship was built, while it was planned to build and test several airships by that time.

Troiani reported that most of the Italians invited by Nobile were not actually certified engineers and did not have much experience in the construction of airships, but were most often simple workers from the Aeronautical Structures Factory. Nobile introduced them to the USSR as engineers [1].

Subsequently, this caused a scandal between Nobile and Troiani and the final break between them. Troiani described this conflict as follows: “He told the Italians that I was a communist, and before the Russians he claimed that I was a fascist spy.” Troiani notified his superiors that he was asking to return to his homeland, since he no longer wanted to work under Nobile [1].

As a result, Feldman offered Troiani the position of chief designer at the Tushino Aeronautical Training Center (VUK).

Troiani took an active part (he was the chief designer) in the construction of the airship, which initially bore the working name VUK-1, and then V-7 (Chelyuskinets). However, when the airship was already ready, the day before the first flight, the boathouse, along with the airships located there, burned down after being hit by lightning. After the loss of the airship V-7, similar airships V-7bis and V-8 were built at Dirigablestroy. The last of the Soviet semi-rigid airships built, the B-9, was based precisely on Troiani’s ideas.


It should be noted that Troiani generally treated his work with some irony. In his memoirs, he wrote that he did not believe in the future of the airship, believing that it was destined to give way to the plane. Troiani returned to his homeland at the end of 1934.

As for Nobile, the main airship built under his leadership was the B-6. Its design began back in September 1932, when the workshops in which it was supposed to be built did not yet exist.

By November 1934, it was possible to prepare the B-6 airship for flights. It was named "Osoaviakhim" and became the largest and best of the Soviet airships. In addition, it was superior to its Italian prototype in terms of flight characteristics. Cruising speed was increased from 90 to 104 km/h. The gondola could accommodate up to 20 passengers. The payload was able to be increased to 8 kg. Nobile was very proud of the result achieved [500].


In September 1937, the airship B-6 set an absolute world record for the duration of an airship's flight, flying along the route Dolgoprudnaya - Novgorod - Shuya - Ivanovo - Kalinin - Bryansk - Kursk - Penza - Voronezh - Vasilsursk and back.

In February 1938, the B-6 airship under the command of N. S. Gudovantsev set off for Murmansk with the goal of evacuating Papanin’s expedition from the drifting North Pole station. From Moscow to Petrozavodsk the flight took place in difficult conditions. The cloud cover was low, it snowed from time to time, and the metal parts of the airship became icy.

Two hours before flying over Petrozavodsk, the airship encountered dense fog and flew blind almost until the moment it approached the city. 18 km from the White Sea station, the airship hit a mountainside and crashed. Rescue teams on skis found 13 dead and 6 survivors [4].

Leaving the USSR at the end of 1936, Nobile rejoiced at the progress achieved:

“The Dolgoprudnaya airship-building base, as a result of the activities of Dirigiblestroy, was already well developed. There were two metal boathouses (one large and one small), many properly equipped manufacturing shops, stone office and living quarters buildings, well-stocked grocery stores, and several miles of railroad sidings. Testing laboratories (TLO), due to the lack of suitable premises, remained for now in Moscow, and the training center (DUK), where airship engineers were trained, remained in Tushino. <...> People no longer proposed plans that had no real basis” [8].

Italian engineers and Soviet reality


In the preface to the Italian edition of his book, Nobile wrote that he was connected with the USSR by a feeling of enormous gratitude, “which became even stronger when the Russians invited me to go work with them, precisely at the saddest period of my life, since at that time it became extremely difficult for me to live in my country” [8].

In general, Nobile had some sympathy for the Soviet Union, despite the fact that at Aeroflot and at Dirigablestroy the attitude towards him and the Italian presence in general was ambiguous - many respected him as a professional, but some contemptuously called him “fascist” generalishko."

Nobile, generally little experienced in politics, naively overestimated Soviet democracy, mistook the scenery for reality and sometimes went too far in his speeches and in his relations with his colleagues at Dirigiblestroy. So, at first he told the workers that trade unions are obliged to protect their interests, and therefore they must demand an improvement in their financial situation. This did not go unnoticed by the relevant authorities [7].

In February 1933, N. Kuibyshev, head of the Naval Inspectorate of the NK RKI, reported to Stalin:

“Conditions have been created for Nobile in which he has the opportunity to freely act as a defender of the working class. Against whom - obviously, against the bodies of Soviet power... It is also significant that it is considered completely normal when Soviet engineering and technical workers seek from Nobile the protection of their rights or satisfaction of their claims. In a word, in “Dirizhablestroy” the fascist General Nobile turned from a technical consultant into a political leader” [7].

In personal communication, Nobile was not always simple and even. On the one hand, those who worked with him noted his constant friendliness, attention to the interlocutor, simplicity and accessibility.

“You could learn a lot from Nobile: how to behave, how to position yourself, and this, by the way, is very important. This is what we call an external culture of treating people,”

– recalled airship designer Vladimir Shevyrev, who personally communicated with Nobile.

He invited fellow designers to his home for Italian pasta and currency Riesling from Torgsin. Chess players also often dropped by to see him on Myasnitskaya, sometimes staying up late at the game and running away to catch the last metro train.

On the other hand, he was very sensitive to any attempts not even to criticize, but simply to take a little deeper interest in his engineering solutions.

The conflict between Nobile and Troiani caused enormous damage to Nobile's reputation in the Soviet Union and the further work of the Dirigiblestroy enterprise. A significant role was also played by the rumors spread by them, mutual accusations of “fascism”, “espionage”, etc. Apparently, Nobile and his comrades were not fully aware of the possible consequences, not only for them, but also for their Russian colleagues. After this conflict, writing complaints and denunciations to higher authorities became commonplace at the enterprise [1].

Many Italians who remained at Dirigablestroy after the departure of Nobile and Troiani, during the period of repression of 1937–1938. were arrested on charges of sabotage and industrial espionage. Total in 1937–1938 199 Italians were arrested in the USSR. For example, Troiani's closest collaborators (both Italians and Russians) were arrested, and many were repressed. They were accused of having a close acquaintance with Troiani. The paradox was that after returning to Italy, Troiani was interrogated regarding his alleged communist sympathies and even espionage activities for the Soviet Union.

Aeronautics and aviation historian Alexei Belokrys notes in his book:

“The head of Dirigiblestroy left the USSR in 1936, shortly before the NKVD brought his former employee-engineers to justice for their “connection” with him, carrying out his espionage assignments and carrying out counter-revolutionary fascist activities with him among the workers. This is exactly what happened in 1937 with airship designers Boris Garf, Mikhail Kanishchev, Vadim Strangel, Vladimir Katansky. The height of absurdity was the accusation of transferring secret information about the structure of Soviet airships to the Italian” [7].

Nevertheless, it was Nobile’s arrival in the USSR that allowed work on the design of Soviet airships to be carried out at a high technical level for its time. In particular, as mentioned earlier, Benito Mussolini not only did not express any objections to Nobile’s departure to the Soviet Union, but also gave him permission to take out the drawings of Italian airships, which allowed Nobile to take full advantage of the results of his previous design work in Italy. This episode may also serve as confirmation of the favorable climate in Soviet-Italian relations at this moment [1].

The USSR managed to become an airship-building power in a short time, and in this branch of industrial production it completely adopted the ideas of Italian designers. Several Soviet airships were built using Nobile’s semi-rigid design, including the largest, the B-6, which brought several records to the USSR. However, its disaster on February 6, 1938 caused the Soviet Union to abandon further construction of airships.

Использованная литература:
[1]. Dyakonova P. G. Soviet-Italian relations in the field of aviation: 1924 - June 22, 1941, dissertation of candidate of historical sciences - M., 2019.
[2]. Makulov S.S. Problems of perception of Italian fascism in the Soviet press, 1922–1941, monograph - M., MGIMO-University, 2021.
[3]. Hormach I. A. Italy and the USSR. 1924–1939. Diplomatic and economic relations. M., 1995. P. 12.
[4]. Dyakonova P. G. Activities of Umberto Nobile and Italian airship construction specialists in the USSR in 1931–1935. / P. G. Dyakonova // Historical journal: scientific research. 2018. No. 4. – pp. 174–183.
[5]. Francesco Surdich. Nobile Umberto. Dizionario Biografico degli Italiani, Volume 78: Natta – Nurra, Istituto dell'Enciclopedia Italiana, Rome 2013.
[6]. Brode B. G. Umberto Nobile. – St. Petersburg: Nauka, 1992.
[7]. Alexey Belokrys. Nine hundred hours of heaven. The unknown history of the airship "SSSR-V6". – M.: Paulsen, 2017.
[8]. Nobile U. Quello che ho visto nella Russia sovietica. Roma: Atlantica, 1945.
71 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    10 March 2024 05: 21
    We made an excellent film with the Italians, “The Red Tent.” Brilliant cast, amazing music by Morricone.
    One marvels at the laxity of the Italians. Their airship has disappeared, and they are not listening to the broadcast. If it weren’t for our radio amateur who caught the SOS signal, Nobile and Malmgren’s groups would have died.
    1. +2
      10 March 2024 10: 56
      Quote: Comrade
      We made an excellent film with the Italians, “The Red Tent.” Brilliant cast, amazing music by Morricone.

      And the combined shots are good, but it’s a pity how Lundborg was treated.
      1. +2
        10 March 2024 14: 06
        Quote: Maxim G
        It's a pity how Lundborg was treated.

        True, but then there was no need to cast Cardinale in the film. She would look unnatural without her voluptuous admirers.
    2. +3
      10 March 2024 13: 48
      We made an excellent film with the Italians, “The Red Tent.” Brilliant cast, amazing music by Morricone.
      It is, of course, true, except for Nikitushka Mikhalkov, who in the film did not play Chukhnovsky, but some kind of hysteric.
      1. +3
        10 March 2024 15: 04
        Quote: Aviator_
        .... We made an excellent film with the Italians, “The Red Tent”. .

        It was impossible to get everything together, Sergei, hi Now ---- I'll take a look for sure. And I really liked the article. Post-revolutionary time, industrialization, development of science, industry, DOSAAF, sports.....
        And how not to remember the words of Stalin
        or we will do it, or we will be crushed

        And everything was done at an accelerated pace
        1. +3
          10 March 2024 16: 09
          The film is not bad, but somehow not ours. The main characters sit, remember and talk. And the absolutely miserable Chukhnovsey, played by the boorish Soviet major Nikitushka Mikhalkov. However, he always plays the same type of hero, himself. As an artist he is nobody.
          1. 0
            10 March 2024 17: 10
            Quote: Aviator_
            ..... Soviet boorish major Nikitushka Mikhalkov. However, he always plays the same type of hero, himself. ...

            After all, those films of his are long-standing for me. But I remember this. There was a conversation between some artists about films. And then about “Station for Two” (sort of? With Gurchenko) And they, the artists, say that Nikita Mikhalkov just came from the Army. And in this film! Wow! Now how many artists have served in the Army?
            1. +2
              10 March 2024 17: 18
              And they, the artists, say that Nikita Mikhalkov just came from the Army back then and into this film!
              He was the one who was talking to the artists like that. He served in the navy as a border guard, and before the film “Tent” came out. Moreover, “Vokzal” (this is generally the 80s). How he served is also known - he sat, wrote “scripts” and portrayed a “creative person”, and the gentlemen officers around him walked on tiptoe and shooed away flies. The flies know what to land on and are not mistaken. I read this in the memoirs of colleagues. I seriously doubt whether he ever wore a kitchen outfit.
              1. 0
                10 March 2024 17: 54
                You know a lot wink Sergey! It's even kind of scary hi
                1. +1
                  10 March 2024 17: 57
                  Yes, I’m already a lot of years old, too, two sons, three grandsons and a granddaughter.
                  1. 0
                    10 March 2024 18: 42
                    Quote: Aviator_
                    Yes, I’m already a lot of years old, too, two sons, three grandsons and a granddaughter.

                    good The fact is that you know a lot about that life, from different aspects and areas, and not just in your specialty. And you immediately quickly remember the right one. I can compare. You know that at work I often communicate with people of different ages and sometimes there is a calm atmosphere and calm conversations and people remember a lot of things. So it's not just me being polite Yes
                    1. +4
                      10 March 2024 19: 14
                      Danelia writes about this major rudeness in his memoirs, how he filmed his first film, “I’m Walking Around Moscow,” and took him to the main role. And Nikitushka still didn’t have enough money, but since he was still a nobody, they paid him at the lowest level. Having filmed half of the picture, Nikitushka told Danelia: “raise the rate, otherwise I’ll leave” (Konchalovsky persuaded him, the same Mr., said that a lot had already been filmed, they wouldn’t replace it with anyone). And Danelia pointed to the door and began to call another actor. Nikitushka became angry, shed a tear, and in tears and snot began to persuade him to leave him. Danelia left it, but described everything in his memoirs. In general, of all the artistic memoirs, I like the memoirs of Lanovoy, Danelia and Menshov, they are honest.
                  2. +1
                    10 March 2024 19: 13
                    Regarding the repressions, I would like to add that yes, not only Italian specialists were repressed, but also from other countries. Including communists. This was due to the fact that when Stalin abandoned the idea of ​​the World Revolution, there was a direction towards
                    socialism in one single country

                    Many of the Communist Communists who arrived did not understand this; they were dissatisfied with why this was so and asked questions. For which they were accused of Trotskyism. They were repressed. I feel sorry for them, of course. But ---- it was.
                    1. +5
                      10 March 2024 19: 24
                      Yes, some fell under this. Zakhar Prilepin writes very well about Lenin, I subscribed to him on Zen. Each day provides current material. I highly recommend it. As for the “World Revolution”, it should not be understood in a straightforward and naive manner, as Makar Nagulnov understood in Sholokhov’s “Virgin Soil Upturned” (by the way, have you read it? In my time, it was included in the school curriculum). It must be understood as the creation of a bloc of socialist states, which in essence was done under Stalin after that war. And the Trotskyists contributed to the death of Republican Spain, it was not for nothing that Ramon Mercader, who introduced Leiba Trotsky to mountaineering equipment, was a Spanish communist.
                      1. +1
                        10 March 2024 19: 34
                        Quote: Aviator_
                        .... the Trotskyists contributed to the death of Republican Spain, it was not for nothing that Ramon Mercader, who introduced Leiba Trotsky to mountaineering equipment, was a Spanish communist.

                        I've read about this. Also that he was raised to be so irreconcilable by his mother, a communist and Soviet intelligence officer ---- Karina Romanovich Mercader.
                        If Trotsky, in his old age, had not gotten involved in disgusting immorality, maybe he would have been able to hide...
                  3. +4
                    10 March 2024 19: 25
                    Again adding to the previous one. In 1927, Trotsky attempted a putsch in 3 cities --- Leningrad, Moscow, Kharkov. They suppressed it quickly. There are references to this. But in 1937, it also happened. True, I have only encountered indirect mentions of this. So there were reasons to fight Trotskyism.
                    1. +4
                      10 March 2024 19: 29
                      Yes, sure. By 1937 there was already information from Schellenberg about Tukhachevsky, read his memoirs “Labyrinth”, published here in 1990 (he wrote them in 1956). And how Stalin also deceived him by paying for information with marked banknotes; when German agents began to pay with them in the USSR, they were quickly caught.
                      1. +2
                        10 March 2024 22: 30
                        Quote: Aviator_
                        By 1937 there was already information from Schellenberg about Tukhachevsky, read his memoirs “Labyrinth”, published here in 1990 (he wrote them in 1956). And how Stalin also deceived him by paying for information with marked banknotes, when German agents began to pay with them in

                        Schellenberg's memoirs are inflatable bullshit. Moreover, even the fact that they were written by him is not at all a fact.
                      2. +2
                        11 March 2024 04: 45
                        Quote: your1970
                        Schellenberg's memoirs are inflatable bullshit
                        Classic memoirs: and then I come out in a white tailcoat wink
                      3. 0
                        11 March 2024 06: 26
                        Quote: Dutchman Michel
                        Quote: your1970
                        Schellenberg's memoirs are inflatable bullshit
                        Classic memoirs: and then I come out in a white tailcoat wink

                        No, this is not a memoir as such - everything there is too contrived. Well, either Schellenberg was a complete idiot and did not understand anything about intelligence.
                        Everything is too pretentious and cinematic
                      4. +2
                        11 March 2024 06: 29
                        Quote: your1970
                        Well, either Schellenberg was a complete idiot and didn’t understand anything about intelligence
                        There is an opinion that the British did serious work on these memoirs. Schellenberg actually knew a lot and had something to write
                      5. +1
                        11 March 2024 06: 57
                        Quote: Dutchman Michel
                        Quote: your1970
                        Well, either Schellenberg was a complete idiot and didn’t understand anything about intelligence
                        There is an opinion that the British did serious work on these memoirs. Schellenberg actually knew a lot and had something to write

                        Either it’s not his at all, or he wrote a “bestseller” and not a memoir.
                      6. +1
                        11 March 2024 08: 32
                        Quote: your1970
                        or he was writing a “bestseller” and not a memoir.
                        Well, he has a very good literary language. If only he wrote it himself
                      7. +2
                        11 March 2024 07: 33
                        that the British seriously worked on these memoirs.
                        Why should they expose Tukhachevsky like that? Justify the "bloody tyrant Stalin"?
                      8. 0
                        11 March 2024 08: 30
                        Quote: Aviator_
                        Why should they expose Tukhachevsky like that? Justify the "bloody tyrant Stalin"?
                        On the contrary, they thereby emphasized its bloodiness
                      9. 0
                        11 March 2024 08: 54
                        Quote: Aviator_
                        that the British seriously worked on these memoirs.
                        Why should they expose Tukhachevsky like that? Justify the "bloody tyrant Stalin"?

                        Intelligence that existed only 4 year and managed to completely decapitate the army of a potential enemy at the hands of the enemy himself - deserves all sorts of praise.
                        It is a filigree the work would be -if if it were true.
                        But “I am tormented by vague doubts...” (c) IVMP
                      10. 0
                        11 March 2024 18: 10
                        and managed to completely decapitate the army of a potential enemy
                        Behead the “hero of the cauldron near Warsaw” and the customer of the mass of tanks without radio stations, who tried to destroy the entire artillery of the Red Army by introducing universal guns instead of specialized ones (air defense, anti-tank guns, howitzers and field guns - see V. Grabin “Weapons of Victory”). Dragging through the adventurer Kurchevsky with his “dynamic rocket guns.” Should I continue the list of achievements of Napoleon the loser? They had to pray for him. But they gave in. We decided that the blitzkrieg would go ahead anyway.
                      11. -1
                        11 March 2024 23: 17
                        Quote: Aviator_
                        customer of a mass of tanks without radio stations
                        If there are no walkie-talkies, at least he can order them - they are not there.
                        Quote: Aviator_
                        Should I continue the list of achievements of Napoleon the loser?
                        - we have a 3rd Reich that existed for 4 (four!!) years as a state; its enemy, the USSR, existed for 20 years.
                        And now the reconnaissance is almost newborn - it destroys the entire top of the enemy army. Even if you do not take into account the personality of Tukhachevsky, distrust of EVERYONE begins in the army. “Isn’t he a German spy?” ALL ask themselves this question.
                        And about usefulness - if now our intelligence achieved that all the generals in the Bundeswehr were shot, would it be useful for us? Naturally!
                        But Schellenberg’s memoirs are an indistinct basis for considering that they were able to do something there. Everything is too whitewashed...
              2. 0
                11 March 2024 18: 29
                He served in the navy in the border guards

                Actually, he served on a minesweeper. I don't think the border guards had them. Moreover, the maritime border units were part of the border troops of the KGB of the USSR. Not the fleet.
            2. 0
              11 March 2024 18: 19
              A small, important clarification.

              In 1972, at the age of 27, he was called up for military service.
              He served in the Pacific Fleet in Kamchatka - first on the shore, then as a sailor on a minesweeper.
              On instructions from the command, as part of a group of four people, he made a 117-day hike on dogs.

              Well, probably not “came from the Army,” but “from the army.” hi
    3. +1
      11 March 2024 08: 11
      Their airship has disappeared, and they don’t listen to the broadcast
      Comrade! Have you heard anything about the passage of radio waves depending on the range, distance, atmospheric conditions and transmitter power? So take the trouble to at least look at the map. And if you think that communicating via regular radio communication in A1A mode (telegraphy), for example, from the Bering Strait to Vladivostok is as easy as talking on a walkie-talkie for a couple of kilometers, then you are very mistaken. And their walkie-talkie probably wasn’t very good. And probably on a manual generator. I had a Brig transmitter on my trawler. One and a half kilowatts of power. And sometimes with great difficulty it was possible to contact the BRC (coast radio center) And Nobile had only an emergency. I think XNUMX watts maximum. hi
  2. +3
    10 March 2024 05: 34
    Quote: Victor Biryukov
    The first airship designed by Nobile, which received the identification mark “USSR-B5”
    The author did not indicate what engine was used in the built airship, what materials its shell was made of, whether it was a one-time production or with a large scope for a series, was there parallel training of specialists during production? To understand the state of affairs in airship construction in our country, this is very important. And one more interesting question: did the invited Italians have contacts with K. Tsiolkovsky?
    1. +6
      10 March 2024 08: 50
      Quote: Dutchman Michel
      what engine was used in the built airship, what materials were its shell made of

      The shell is made of corded rubber, manufactured by a Moscow plant Rubber, evacuated from Riga during the First World War, but not everything is entirely clear about the engine. We assembled engines under license Fiat и Daimler, but which ones were installed on these airships is not known. In addition, the production of these engines was not widespread - the five-year plans had not yet gained the proper momentum...
      1. +4
        10 March 2024 09: 49
        We assembled Fiat and Daimler engines under license, but it is not known which ones were installed on these airships.

        The literature refers to Maybach Mb.IVa engines, specially ordered in Germany for airships. Considering that they were successfully used on Zeppelin airships, the information can be considered reliable.
        The shell is made of corded rubber, manufactured by the Moscow Kauchuk plant

        Description of the fabric for the shell from the book "AIR SHIP (AIRSHIP)" published by the Main Editorial Board of Aviation Literature, 1935.
        Percale is a material used for the shell of an airship. Made from cotton
        fabrics. The tensile strength of a single-layer percale is approximately 700 kg, and that of a two-layer percale is 1100 kg. The fabric is rubberized to reduce gas diffusion, vulcanized, that is, treated with sulfur and coated with yellow paint (chrome) to protect against ultraviolet rays that destroy the shell.
        The weight data (approximate) of such matter is as follows: 1 sq. a meter of percale weighs
        96 g, 1 sq. a full meter of finished two-layer fabric - 325 g, also aluminized (against solar heating) - 330 g, 1 square meter of completely finished three-layer fabric - 500 g.
        When tested for gas permeability, a two-layer fabric should give
        gas leakage no more than 10 liters per 1 m2 per day (at + 15° C); three-layer - no more than 4 liters, embroidered material - no more than 1 liter. At a pressure of 10 mm,
        water column, good fabric allows gas leakage per day of 1,5% of the total volume,
        but practically no more than 3%.
        1. +1
          10 March 2024 16: 28
          Quote: Dekabrist
          The literature refers to the Maybach Mb.IVa engines, specially ordered in Germany for airships

          According to the Versailles requirements, any production of aviation equipment was prohibited in Germany. This included Maybach, which after the First World War switched to the production of engines for cars, therefore, this engine had nothing to do with airships built by Italian engineers... Most likely, they were FIATs that were collected under license. I know for sure that the first Soviet airships, built before the arrival of the Italians, were equipped with engines from this company...

          Quote: Dekabrist
          Description of the fabric for the shell from the book "AIRSHIP (AIRSHIP)"...
          ...Percale is the material used for the shell of an airship

          Probably, this refers to percale as a reinforcing element for the rubber of gas cylinders, giving them the required strength. Or, as an option, a skin for grouping gas cylinders and giving the airship the calculated aerodynamic shape...

          Quote: Dekabrist
          At a pressure of 10 mm of water column, a good fabric allows gas leakage per day of 1,5% of the total volume, but practically no more than 3%

          10 mm of water column is a very insignificant pressure. For greater clarity, I will say that the maximum gas pressure in a household gas pipeline supplying gas to consumer homes is 300 mm. water pillar That is, if it occurs to you to cut a gas pipeline and then plug it with your finger, you can easily do it without even feeling any pressure in it. In the gas cylinders of an airship, the pressure is calculated in more serious figures and no percale simply can withstand it...
          1. -1
            10 March 2024 17: 37
            This included Maybach, which after the First World War switched to the production of engines for cars, therefore, this engine had nothing to do with the airships built by Italian engineers...

            The fact that the Maybach-Motorenbau company stopped producing aircraft engines in 1918 does not mean that in the same year all the aircraft engines this company produced earlier, including 2000 Maybach Mb.IVa engines, ceased to exist. You won't believe it, but the airships Nobile Norge and Italia had Maybach engines. The photo shows a Yugoslav Fizir F1V-Maybach aircraft with a Maybach Mb.IVa engine, 1928, 32 produced.
            1. -1
              10 March 2024 20: 28
              Quote: Dekabrist
              including 2000 Maybach Mb.IVa engines

              Can you provide a link to a source about 2000 engines?

              Quote: Dekabrist
              In the photo - a Yugoslav Fizir F1V-Maybach aircraft with a Maybach Mb.IVa engine

              And again about 2000 engines - where is the source?

              In 1924, the Germans secretly produced about a hundred Heinkel aircraft, circumventing the Versailles laws, and sold them to Sweden. They also had an engine installed. Maybach. The scandal in the Reichstag was severe. But the question is - where? firewood engines?
              1. -1
                10 March 2024 20: 50
                where is the source from?

                Use Google
          2. 0
            10 March 2024 18: 47
            In the gas cylinders of an airship, the pressure is calculated in more serious figures and no percale simply can withstand it...

            And what is the pressure in the gas cylinders of a semi-rigid type gas airship?
            1. -1
              10 March 2024 20: 30
              Quote: Dekabrist
              And what is the pressure in the gas cylinders of a semi-rigid type gas airship?

              Use Google
              1. -1
                10 March 2024 20: 49
                Use Google

                Mutually. But so that you don’t get too upset by the blow to your emergency response after visiting Google, I warn you - it’s atmospheric.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                2. -1
                  11 March 2024 07: 30
                  Quote: Dekabrist
                  But so that you don’t get too upset by the blow to your emergency response after visiting Google, I warn you - it’s atmospheric

                  Without specific references, all your words are just verbal vent
                  1. 0
                    11 March 2024 08: 45
                    Without specific references, all your words are just verbal venting

                    I pointed out to you the book to which I referred in the very first comment, but you, instead of familiarizing yourself with the question (on Google, which you recommend to everyone, a lot of books are available with a detailed description of the gas and air systems of airships) and admit the mistake (make a mistake anyone can), you persist in your ignorance. This, you know, may indicate the presence of negativismus in all its manifestations.
                    1. -2
                      11 March 2024 16: 17
                      Quote: Dekabrist
                      instead of reading the question

                      I know all this without this scan of yours. I repeat my question - 2000 pieces of Maybach aircraft engines - where is the source? If you don’t know, don’t waste my time, go and call meиgo somewhere else...
                      1. 0
                        11 March 2024 20: 47
                        Yes, negativismus, and clearly according to Eugen Bleuler. Your affairs are bad.
                      2. 0
                        11 March 2024 22: 37
                        I repeat my question

                        To begin with, honestly admit that, to put it mildly, you are in a puddle with the pressure. Then we'll move on to the engines.
          3. +3
            10 March 2024 19: 12
            You should at least read the relevant literature first before making any assertions. The Nobile airships were equipped with Maybach engines, this is open data. The USSR-B6 was also equipped with them. After the end of the First World War, Czechoslovak Smolík S-2 (Sm-2) aircraft, for example, were also equipped with Maybach Mb.IVa engines - a number of the engines ended up there as war reparations. Moreover, Maybach engines were also installed on the Graf Zeppelin airship, developed in Germany in 1928, although these were engines of a different type (internal combustion) Maybach VL II.
            1. 0
              10 March 2024 20: 17
              Quote: Viktor Biryukov
              Have you at least read the relevant literature first?

              I'm waiting for a link from you relevant literature, especially about what engine was installed on the B6 airship by Italian engineers...

              Quote: Viktor Biryukov
              Moreover, Maybach engines were also installed on the Graf Zeppelin airship.

              What engine was on Graf Zeppelin I know without you. Where could he have come from in 1928? Can you explain this?
    2. +4
      10 March 2024 10: 16
      I tried not to go into technical details - there is no point in burdening readers with this, the article was already quite long. At that time, of course, there was no domestic engine specialized for use on airships (not only as a serial product, but also as a project in principle). As the reader correctly wrote above, water-cooled Mb IVa motors from the German company Maybach were used. The airship "SSSR-B6" was equipped with three motors located in motor nacelles. The same engines, specially created for operation at high altitudes, were equipped with late models of German Zeppelins during the First World War, and they were also installed on the Norway and Italy.
      1. +3
        10 March 2024 11: 06
        Quote: Viktor Biryukov
        At that time, of course, there was no domestic engine specialized for use on airships
        During WWI, engines for airships and airplanes were made in small quantities by the Russian Renault company from French components. Whether all this was left as an inheritance, I haven’t seen anywhere. The plant remained, but production was shrouded in fog. They made their own aircraft engines at the St. Petersburg Polytechnic Institute, but also in small quantities. There were also small workshops where they also made engines, but they could be counted on the fingers of one hand
        1. +1
          10 March 2024 16: 37
          Quote: Dutchman Michel
          They made their own aircraft engines at the St. Petersburg Polytechnic Institute, but also in small quantities. There were also small workshops where they also made engines

          Yes, there were many of these, but unfortunately, they were almost single copies, produced out of sheer enthusiasm...
      2. +2
        10 March 2024 16: 36
        Quote: Viktor Biryukov
        Mb IVa motors from the German company Maybach with water cooling. The airship "SSSR-V6" was equipped with three engines

        The latest aircraft engine company Maybach released in 1918...
      3. 0
        11 March 2024 21: 20
        Quote: Viktor Biryukov
        I tried not to go into technical details - there is no point in burdening readers with this, the article was already quite long.

        Without technical details, the rather long article turned out to be almost entirely devoted to the squabbles and intrigues between Nobile and Troiani. Discussing who wrote denunciations about whom does not help much in understanding the problems of airship construction. Some kind of fiction.
  3. +6
    10 March 2024 07: 53
    Quote: Comrade
    We made an excellent film with the Italians, “The Red Tent.” Brilliant cast, amazing music by Morricone.
    One marvels at the laxity of the Italians. Their airship has disappeared, and they are not listening to the broadcast. If it weren’t for our radio amateur who caught the SOS signal, Nobile and Malmgren’s groups would have died.

    In my opinion, you are wrong. Zatsepin’s music written for the film is much better than mine, but my music is much more expensive and it will be in the film, as Marricone himself said. As for the cast, the weak link in it, of course, is the false “flash” Claudia Cardinale. Neither her monologues, nor her glances, nor her kisses are unconvincing. And the Soviet viewer cannot be fooled by a nurse running around Spitsbergen in a fashionable fur coat, thin tights and light boots. And it was not Kalatozov’s mistake to invite Claudia Cardinale to star in the film. Cardinale at that time was the bride of the Italian producer of the film, and Kalatozov obeyed his condition.
    And since this VO section where we are now writing is “History,” the last thing to look for in Kalatozov’s film “The Red Tent” is historical accuracy and the chronology of the disaster. Kalatozov sends us on a psychological “expedition”, where there are no brightly negative images and historical chronology of the event. There are simply different people there - good and evil, unhappy and happy, vengeful and devoted - but not good or bad...
    If a Western viewer will call this film an ordinary blockbuster pursuing commercial goals, then a Soviet viewer will call this film a film of a very high artistic class, where themes fundamental to man are raised.
    1. 0
      11 March 2024 01: 29
      Quote: north 2
      In my opinion, you are wrong. Zatsepin’s music written for the film is much better than mine, but my music is much more expensive and it will be in the film, as Marricone himself said.

      Have you personally heard Zatsepin’s music for this film that you think I’m wrong?

      Music cannot be measured with a ruler or weighed on scales, so that later you can say, this is longer, and this is heavier.
      Some people like The Beatles, others Uriah Heep. But this does not mean that one of these groups is better than the other. They are too different, and there are no common criteria for comparing their work.
      I really like the work of both groups, as well as the music of Zatsepin and Morricone. I really love M. Bernes and L. Utesov, but no one can convince me that one of them sings better than the other.
      Everything is well placed, without being able to compare, I think Morricone wrote a brilliant score for the film.

      If you provide a link to Zatsepin’s music, I’ll be happy to listen. Perhaps I'll change my mind.
      1. 0
        11 March 2024 06: 54
        What was that! Can I give you a link to Zatsepin's music for the film "The Red Tent"? So enter in YOUTUBE the words Zatsepin “Seashore” this is Zatsepin’s music for this film. And enter in YOUTUBE the words Morricone “Farewell”, or in Russian Morricone “Farewell”, this is Morricone’s music for this film. Why two music? Yes, because in the Soviet box office the film had music by Zatsepin, and in the West it was shown with music by Morricone. So everyone who watched this film knows Zatsepin’s music for this film, and only my upbringing does not allow your question to be called shameless.
        As for whose music is better, read my comment again and you will see that it was not me who gave the assessment, but Morricone himself, and from this music Morricone made a very rich profit from the film's distribution in the West. This is from the words of Morricone himself, which is also in articles on the Internet.
  4. +4
    10 March 2024 08: 28
    Mussolini wanted to annex Franz Josef Land to his possessions

    Franz Josef Land became part of the USSR in the 20s. One must assume that Mussolini made territorial claims against the USSR?
    1. +4
      10 March 2024 09: 55
      No, Italy did not officially make territorial demands to the USSR. These were only assumptions expressed by Nobile himself in one of his books (Nobile U. Addio Malyghin! Сon i russi, fra i ghiacci della terra Francesco Giusppe: seguito da una nota storica sulla scoperta ed esplorazione di quella terra. Milano, 1948). He wrote that the formal basis for the annexation of Franz Josef Land to Italy could be the fact that it was discovered by an Austro-Hungarian expedition, equipped in Trieste, a predominantly Italian city, which was then the main port of Austria-Hungary. And Trieste, as you know, became part of Italy after the First World War. But, again, these were only Nobile’s assumptions and it is difficult to say whether Mussolini really had such plans.
  5. BAI
    +1
    10 March 2024 08: 57
    The USSR managed to become an airship-building power in a short time

    What for? Dead end branch of development
    1. +5
      10 March 2024 09: 09
      Quote: BAI
      What for? Dead end branch of development

      We know this now, but then airships had Golden ageuntil they were finally driven out of the sky by planes...
    2. +5
      10 March 2024 14: 29
      Quote: BAI
      What for? Dead end branch of development
      Airplanes were still poor back then. And airships could carry people and cargo.
  6. +8
    10 March 2024 13: 35
    As an Italian, I will tell you that the article about Umberto Nobile and the USSR-Italy cooperation in the field of airships is excellent and detailed, because many details here are little known, for example the very reason why the Mussolini government did not approve of Nobile. In addition, for philatelic curiosity, there are envelopes with an Erinnophile stamp of the airship "NORGE", which flew over Alaska, carried by an Italian crew and has good economic value.
    1. 0
      10 March 2024 14: 28
      As an Italian, I will tell you that the article about Umberto Nobile and the USSR-Italy cooperation in the field of airships is excellent and detailed, because many details here are little known, for example the very reason why the Mussolini government did not approve of Nobile.

      It is obvious that, even as an Italian, you have little interest in your own history. Are you, as an Italian, not familiar with “Italiani al Polo Nord: la tragedia del Dirigibile Italia”? But even in 1960, the Gianni Bisiach program attracted 28 viewers.
      1. +4
        10 March 2024 19: 03
        Personally, I have only known the figure of Umberto Nobile for a few years, having become acquainted with him through philately and then by reading various articles on the Internet. At school they don’t tell us anything about Nobile, perhaps because his figure is associated with the years of fascism and everyone here is censored. Even the figure of Gianni Biasic is unknown to most, despite the record 28 million viewers of his programs.
  7. +3
    10 March 2024 14: 00
    Martynov Apollinariy Konstantinovich (1901 - 1991) - one of the scientists in the field of experimental aerodynamics of aircraft, the development of aerodynamic research base, technology and experimental methods. Science organizer and teacher. Student N.E. Zhukovsky (as Vika writes about him). In addition, he was the head of the TsAGI graduate school from 1970 to the end of the 80s. So, Apollinarius Konstantinovich really did not like airships. That's all because. that in the 30s he had to be in the mooring crew on Khodynskoye Field, where the airships were based. He ended up on this team because of his own curiosity; he was placed last when the crew pulled the apparatus to the mooring mast using the guiderope. And the latter was always doused with dumped ballast (water) after mooring. So he, the volunteer assistant, got it.
  8. +6
    10 March 2024 14: 28
    Announcement at the post office: “Telegrams related to the search for the missing Nobile expedition are accepted free of charge.” Rabinovich telegraphs to a friend in Odessa: “Chaim zpt look for Nobile period If you don’t find zpt send smoked mackerel period.”
    1. +1
      10 March 2024 23: 19
      Mackerel, fatty and moderately salted, smoked and hung, is very good! The article is also delicious, there’s nothing to say about the film, I passed it by, how young we were...
  9. +1
    10 March 2024 22: 19
    Thanks, very interesting.
  10. +4
    11 March 2024 00: 21
    Thank you for the article. A number of additions:

    - The design of the V-7 steering system (which later burned down in the hangar) was carried out by a young Soviet engineer, Evgeniy Lvovich Ginzburg, the grandfather of the author of this commentary.

    - It was not for nothing that the B-7 was called “Chelyuskinets” - initially the Chelyuskin expedition was planned to be evacuated on it. A film was made in the Moscow region about the rescue of the expedition by the B-6 airship. This was due to the fact that the film could deteriorate in the Arctic frost, and it was not possible to shoot the necessary footage on the spot.

    - Evgeny Ginzburg was the developer of the mooring device, which the airship had to bring with itself and drop onto the ice in order to moor.

    - Troiani mastered the Russian language, but for a long time hid this fact from his subordinates, who liked to make caustic remarks about their boss in his presence. He spoke to the team in Russian, already saying goodbye, which caused everyone’s amazement.


    - During the fire that led to the death of the B-6, Evgeny Ginzburg himself was in the hangar and barely escaped - together with another young engineer, he grabbed an elderly colleague by the arms and ran out through the central gate. The fire was so strong that despite the heavy rain, the backs of the runners remained dry.

    Source of information: family legends.
  11. +1
    11 March 2024 08: 32
    Thanks to the Author, an interesting and seriously researched article.

    Stories such as the rescue of the Italia crew prove that countries and peoples not only fight each other, but also try to help each other in cases of disaster. At least sometimes.

    Maybe even wars are not the main achievement of civilization...
  12. 0
    April 8 2024 00: 59
    Not certainly in that way. Even after the B-6 disaster in the USSR, airships were still built. Already during the war, two were built - B - 12 (most likely, a new assembly of a previously dismantled design in 1940) in 1942 and "Pobeda" in 1944. Together with "Pobeda" (in the same year) they built another and a motorized balloon "Baby", designed for parachute training jumps. True, these were all soft-type airships, but they successfully fulfilled their role during the Second World War (and even more than that).