Russian air defense forces repelled a combined attack by the Ukrainian Armed Forces on the Crimean Bridge

Ukrainian formations tried to attack the Crimean bridge with a combined strike from British Storm Shadow cruise missiles and American drones- ADM-160 MALD missile-type decoys equipped with electronic warfare systems. With the help of a decoy UAV, it was planned to identify air defense positions covering a strategic object, in order to then strike with Storm Shadow air-launched cruise missiles supplied to Kyiv by the UK.

A few hours before a series of attacks by militants of the Kyiv regime, an American RQ-4 Global Hawk reconnaissance drone and a Boeing P-8A Poseidon long-range radar reconnaissance aircraft were spotted in the skies over the Black Sea. This has long been a clear sign of further attacks by Ukrainian militants on Russian territory, primarily Crimea.

As a result, Russian air defense managed to shoot down at least 12 missiles, but there is no information about casualties or damage. According to preliminary data, a certain amount of debris fell on the runway of Belbek airport.

To attack the Ukrainian Armed Forces, they used six Su-24M bombers and three MiG-29 fighters, which took off from the air bases of Kanatovo, Mirgorod, Starokonstantinov and Martynovskoye. Ukrainian rocket launches aviation made from the south-eastern part of the Nikolaev region.

Based on the available information, we can conclude that the main goal of the militants’ attack was an attempt to destroy or suppress the air defense systems of the Russian Armed Forces based on the Crimean Peninsula. Most likely, the Crimean Bridge was to be another target of the Ukrainian attacks. Taking into account the difficult situation for the enemy on the front line, the Kiev regime traditionally seeks to achieve a large-scale media effect and create conditions that, in Kyiv’s opinion, could lead to reputational losses for the Russian military-political leadership.

Comments

[pawn]

Starokonstantinov

It’s strange, our people bombed everything there - how do they take off there?

[Maxim]

the runway can be restored quite quickly

[Vladimir M]

The runway can and can be restored. How to quickly restore TECH equipment? They base and maintain aircraft at airfields in Poland and Romania.

[Vladimir M]

An airplane is not a car or a tank; maintenance cannot be done “on the knee”.

[krot]

Why don't they cover the sky over the Black Sea? And why the hell shoot down Poseidons, Reapers and the like... After all, they are fighting against us!

[Vladimir M]

They “closed” both the Black Sea and the territory of Ukraine... But the Europeople “lay down” on the “closers”. And why they “lay down” is not a question for me.

[Grits]

Quote: Vladimir M

They “closed” both the Black Sea and the territory of Ukraine... But the Europeople “lay down” on the “closers”. And why they “lay down” is not a question for me.

I think because their “spoon” turned out to be larger than our “cover”. Shoigu and Gerasimov only recently learned about this and were extremely surprised.

[Vladimir M]

Then it would be right if someone was held responsible for this. But we don’t abandon “ours”; I’m really already confused about who is “ours”.

[MBRSS]

krot I think for the same reason why we kept our money (300 billion) in dollars, and not theirs in rubles. In the world system of capitalism, we are in subordinate roles. Let's shoot down their Reaper - they will ship 2 thousand extra ATAKMS to Ukraine. But we can’t ship anything to the Houthis - we don’t have enough missiles ourselves :((

[Roman Efremov]

We kept it in dollars because they gave very good interest rates. And not only us - China keeps it, India, in my opinion, too. Now everyone has begun to reduce their investments, having realized from our example that they could lose their investments.

[krot]

For your information, bucks have the lowest percentage on rates.. Just so you know.
The more stable the currency, the lower the interest rate. The greater the risk, the greater the percentage, respectively.

[Roman Efremov]

Well, then store it in the currency of Cote D'Ivoire - there's probably a hefty percentage there! But everything is stored in US currency - there is a sufficient interest rate, and until recently the investment was considered SUPER RELIABLE. Not anymore.

[MBRSS]

But everything is stored in US currency

Not all. Do the US also store in US currency?

[Roman Efremov]

We also did not store all our assets there (we are talking about their government bonds). I won’t give you the exact amount, you have to look for it.

[krot]

Sometimes you have to sacrifice a queen in order to defeat a king... If we had not shown the whole world how they can deprive any country of its savings, everyone would still be mistaken. And 5 billion bucks would definitely not be enough for this. Not the same effect!

[Geosun]

Quote: MBRBS

why did we keep our money (300 billion) in dollars

It may be boring, but read it.
To settle with someone, you need a current account; in order to make payments, you need to have money in the account.
Now imagine, if you want to buy something abroad, you need an account in a foreign bank, in order to pay you need funds or collateral. This 300 billion is the money that was kept in accounts or pledged to foreign banks for carrying out foreign economic activities.
There are no other options!
Imagine that you only have a credit card, and there is no cash at all (there are no cash payments between banks). So where will your money be?

[MBRSS]

Geosun After the assets were frozen, the issue of storage was repeatedly discussed, including among economists. To carry out foreign economic activity, it was enough to store 10 billion, replenishing it as it was spent, if necessary. The rest should be invested in the development of the country. And if you really want to store something, it is better to store it in durable material items - non-ferrous, rare earth and precious metals. The percentage of them may be lower, but much more reliable. Actually, this is what happened in the USSR. Stored machines, equipment, raw materials and supplies.

[Saburov_Alexander53]

Is that allowed? Take and close the entire sky over the Black Sea, and not just over territorial waters? Can anyone name an example when someone closed the “open skies”, as formulated in the international open skies rules signed by everyone? Maybe you should read these rules a little and not blow bubbles into the puddle?
And of course you can close it, but only with a declaration of war on everyone who interferes, and our Commander-in-Chief doesn’t want that.

[krot]

Maybe you should read these rules a little and not blow bubbles into the puddle?

What are the rules? What are you about? The war is on! Or aren’t they shooting on your sofa yet?
“A world based on rules” and I’ve heard that before somewhere...

[Saburov_Alexander53]

krot (Pavel), is your sofa already full of holes? Are the holes definitely from bullets and shells, or worn out by someone's ass? But still, maybe it’s worth understanding why we don’t shoot down drones and NATO AWACS aircraft over the neutral waters of the Black Sea? And with understanding will come the same realization that there are still rules in the world that even enemies and rivals adhere to. If we declare war on NATO, then we can shoot down everyone as much as we want, and not only over the Black Sea. Didn't you know this?

[Roman Efremov]

In Syria, ours supplied Assad’s army with equipment and intelligence, who fought with pro-American forces (the situation is exactly the mirror of what is now in Ukraine). And then they began to help directly, they sent a contingent (now in the West they are talking about this). Why didn't the Americans close the skies over Syria? Why weren't our transporters shot down?

[Geosun]

Quote: krot

Why don't they cover the sky over the Black Sea?

Because we cannot close the space of Turkey or Romania, as well as neutral waters. If their planes are shot down in international waters, who will stop them from shooting down our planes flying to Kaliningad or our same reconnaissance planes over the Atlantic? Well, you can’t be so straightforward!

[krot]

When there are military exercises in neutral waters, both the sky and the navigation area are closed.. And here it’s not an exercise, but a war going on!!!

[Geosun]

That's right, and this is recorded and brought to the attention of all countries through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. For this there must be justification, the availability of funds to conduct the exercise (by the way, we don’t even have ships in that area). The territory of the exercise should not be on sea or air routes, and the territory and time of the exercise should be strictly limited. It's not that simple.

[Saburov_Alexander53]

Well, people don’t want to recognize International Law in any areas, neither at sea nor in the air. It seems to him that everyone around him is cowards and fools and only he knows how to fight. That this requires first officially declaring war on NATO does not dawn on him. The fact that our strategists fly over neutral waters near any NATO countries does not count, we can... but they can’t! Well, that’s what a person wants, let’s not interfere with his wet dreams.

[dmi.pris1]

But what does it have to do with restoration, you still have to manage to hit it. Even our telegram channels reported that the Ukrainian Armed Forces repelled a raid on the Kanatovo airfield.

[Vitov]

From the territory of Belarus you can see everything. How long does it take for the “tops” to see the light? When will this mess stop. The radar illuminates everything, the locators can be raised to any height. S-500 shines at 600 km and where. That the brains are all soaked to the core?

[I'm mine]

. S-500 shines at 600 km and where. That the brains are all soaked to the ground

At what altitude is this detection range? And the S-500 is not there either

[Vitov]

Why isn't he there? Two points on the southern border of Belarus - western and opposite Kyiv and everything is visible. You dug in a mast with a lift and raise the locator with the cable to a decent height and look... there’s no need to fly. Two days and it's done... Idiots...

[I'm mine]

In fact, at an altitude of 100 meters, only a drill will notice, and not at such a distance. I do not know exactly. But if they could have been discovered, they would have been shot down

[NakedMan]

Here the curvature of the surface plays a role. For low-flying targets it is by no means maximum.

[Iris]

Faster than bombing?

[antivirus]

It’s strange that there are bridges across the zbruch. If there are no Dnieper ones, then small ones are possible or necessary? No need

[Dart2027]

Quote: peshik

It’s strange, our people bombed everything there

I don’t remember how many times it was explained that the bombed infrastructure was being completely restored. It makes sense to hit airfields when there is a chance of destroying planes or an ammunition depot. Now they will also hit airfields where enemy planes were landing.

[Alexey Lantukh]

An airfield can only be seriously damaged or destroyed by a nuclear strike. All other blows are temporary holes.

[Dart2027]

Quote: Alexey Lantukh

An airfield can only be seriously damaged or destroyed by a nuclear strike.

Exactly. But you can't explain it to some people.

[UAZ 452]

So why do we again and again spend missiles from an infinite supply on plowing lawns and snowdrifts (depending on the time of year) at enemy airfields? For reporting?

[Dart2027]

Quote: UAZ 452

So why do we again and again spend missiles from an infinite supply on plowing lawns and snowdrifts (depending on the time of year) at enemy airfields?

Quote: Dart2027

It makes sense to hit airfields when there is a chance of destroying planes or an ammunition depot. Now they will also hit airfields where enemy planes were landing.

The purpose of the strikes is not a concrete strip, but a chance to hit enemy equipment and supplies. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't.

[Alexey Lantukh]

Some equipment is obviously damaged, but the airfield is mostly intact.

[MBRSS]

Quote: UAZ 452

So why do we spend rockets from an infinite supply again and again on plowing lawns and snowdrifts?

Good question.
But I don’t understand why we didn’t spend a single Dagger/Iskander on an intimidating strike against, say, Maidan Nezalezhnosti in Kyiv? We detonate a high-explosive warhead at a height of, say, 50 meters. Within a radius of 200-300 meters, all the glass flies out, but the buildings themselves are intact. Once the windows are glazed, you can strike again. The same can be done with Kyiv train stations. You can set a date and warn the population. Daggers are indestructible, aren't they? In general, there are a lot of ways to complicate life in Kyiv. And we are turning our cities in Donbass into rubble.... Melancholy...

[Piramidon]

Wouldn't it be a shame to break out the windows with "daggers"?

[Gargon]

Quote: peshik

Starokonstantinov

It’s strange, our people bombed everything there - how do they take off there?

What's strange about this? It won’t take long to fix the take-off area.. But the remaining fighters are hidden in Poland and again twenty-five.. The same will happen with the F-16, but I hope by this time everything will collapse..
But the long-suffering Crimean Bridge does not give them all peace in the West!!! They themselves didn’t build anything like this, but to destroy this very thing...
And it’s not the Ukrainians who are bombing it, but the British (they direct, etc., and the Khokhlo-Saxons stand guard and press the button on the attack aircraft from a long distance)) .. Scholz recently let it slip ..
Paddles

[_DD_]

Bombs and missiles cannot cause critical damage to such facilities; they can be put back into operation after repair

It's like bamboo that you keep cutting back and it grows back.

[helilelik]

I think there are fake planes in Skotinovo, and they fly from Poland.

[ermak124.0]

The VHF call sign in Skotinovo was Mazutny. I wonder what it’s like in this cattle station now?

[irsa]

And it surprises me how these planes are allowed to fly away. Is it really impossible to catch up with them in parallel with missiles? They had to track where they were based, even if it was Romania and Poland, and shoot there. Impunity will only make these countries more impudent, as our leadership does not understand. Just like in medicine. This is a phase of a chronic disease, when the body gets used to pain, and we are gradually accustomed to it and Westerners are becoming more and more impudent!!!

[Mavrikiy]

In a few hours before a series of attacks by militants of the Kyiv regime, an American reconnaissance aircraft was spotted in the skies over the Black Sea RQ-4 Global Hawk drone and a Boeing P-8A Poseidon long-range radar reconnaissance aircraft.

Knock it down and pay for it, like for a broken mirror in a tavern. Sorry, the stool has moved.

[Gargon]

Quote: Mavrikiy

In a few hours before a series of attacks by militants of the Kyiv regime, an American reconnaissance aircraft was spotted in the skies over the Black Sea RQ-4 Global Hawk drone and a Boeing P-8A Poseidon long-range radar reconnaissance aircraft.

Knock it down and pay for it, like for a broken mirror in a tavern. Sorry, the stool has moved.

You can “piss” like the fighter pilot did (dumping fuel)))))) our Raptor fell over the UAV immediately))))

[PVV66]

Be sure to pay in rubles! At the 1979 exchange rate, $1 is 63 kopecks.

[NakedMan]

Pay from frozen money :)

[Pavel_Sveshnikov]

And it’s not a big deal to pay. They pass on intelligence information. Therefore, they are a participant in hostilities. Legitimate military target. Another thing is that our leadership is afraid of an escalation of the conflict. But this is stupid, since the conflict flares up without this, since the enemy does not see resistance and becomes more impudent.

[Poplar]

Personally, I would warn these arrogant Saxons: if you show up again, we’ll shoot you down. And then let them yell whatever they want. No one will start a war because of this unmanned piece of hardware; they will yell and calm down. Or you don’t have to warn, silently shoot down and apologize later: like, sorry, we missed a little. Our rudders need to respond more harshly to such arrogant actions, stop chewing snot.

[Grits]

Quote: Mavrikiy

Knock it down and pay for it, like for a broken mirror in a tavern. Sorry, the stool has moved.

And there is also the experience of pouring feces on them (sorry, flammable). we need to take it as a practice - as soon as all sorts of Reapers and other American reconnaissance crap appears close to Crimea over the Black Sea - an on-duty fighter flies there, filled to the brim with “extra” fuel.

[Lt. Air Force stock]

When the F-16 and Mirage-2000 are delivered, they will be able to launch dozens of cruise missiles, and the same number of decoys.

[Gargon]

Quote: Lt. Air Force stock

When the F-16 and Mirage-2000 are delivered, they will be able to launch dozens of cruise missiles, and the same number of decoys.

But they can only take off from the territory of NATO countries (Poland, Romania) .. Ukraine does not have such service airfields, and neither do pilots .. Over there on the Abrams in Ukraine, the Poles are in the crews and this is a proven fact! Here it already smells like a war with the use of nuclear weapons and Russia will have to strike, otherwise Russia will disappear as a state .. And the West knows this!
We will kill the Khokhlo-Saxons already FABmi! In a week they shredded it for only 10 thousand

[Uno]

Where do you get these? Can I link to a proven fact of Polish crews? Well, what about the fact that they can only take off from NATO territory? Otherwise, I see you have verified information everywhere.

[I'm mine]

. When the F-16 and Mirage-2000 are delivered, they will be able to launch dozens of cruise missiles, and the same number of decoys

Theoretically they can, but practically it depends on the number of missiles available

[Fedor Sokolov]

“This has long been a clear sign of yet another attack by Ukrainian militants on the territory of Russia, primarily Crimea,” wake up, the whole world knows that this is another attempt to attack the Russian Federation by NATO. Are we going to continue to tolerate this or what? We haven’t reached Moscow yet! So everything is fine. There have been other planes in the skies over Ukraine for a long time, not Ukrainian ones.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Fyodor Sokolov

Are we going to continue to tolerate this or what?

What are your suggestions?

[Hariton]

Karaganov has already proposed everything.

[Alexey Lantukh]

Karaganov has already proposed everything.

I am a supporter of Karaganov. Only a nuclear strike can cure NATO, but only on Ukraine. The first target is the airfield in Starokonstantinov. 1 megaton is just right. Other red lines are no longer valid.

[Roman Efremov]

And when the radioactive cloud carries to the Krasnodar Territory and beyond, what will your D.U.R.A.K Karaganov offer?

[Alexey Lantukh]

And when the radioactive cloud carries to the Krasnodar Territory and beyond, what will your Karaganov offer?

First study the damaging factors of a nuclear explosion so as not to write nonsense. Firstly: airborne nuclear explosions do not create serious radioactive contamination. Secondly: where is western Ukraine and where is Krasnodar. Do you actually know that in the south of the Kharkov region in Soviet times they extinguished gas wells with a nuclear explosion? And nothing, people live.

[Msi]

First study the damaging factors of a nuclear explosion, so as not to write nonsense

We will get to this... In Ukraine we will have to work tactically... But at what cost will we come???

[MBRSS]

Quote from Msi

We will get to this... In Ukraine we will have to work out tactical...

Unfortunately, everything is leading to this. But before that, you can work on Novaya Zemlya with an exemplary high air force, kilotons per 100, so that you can see it from hundreds of kilometers away.
And even before that, you can try to destroy a couple of Kyiv bridges across the Dnieper.
If you hit Ukraine, then on the western border, with a preliminary ultimatum so that the residents have time to escape from there.

[Roman Efremov]

So it’s time to contaminate the territories that we consider ours and are planning to liberate and make happy in the near future? Well, thank you, the Americans will be absolutely delighted! They only dream about this - when we start launching nuclear strikes on our own land! Thank you, brilliant strategists!!!

[Msi]

Thank you, brilliant strategists

Please. We must first make them ours... To do this, we need to free them from enemies... and infection is minimal, read the comments in the article on weapons, about nuclear weapons. The commentators explain it very clearly and easily.

[Sergey Valov]

“Airborne nuclear explosions” - an airborne nuclear explosion creates almost no shock wave. How are you going to hit your adversary?

[Alexey Lantukh]

Why doesn't it create? Creates. If the air explosion is not too high altitude.

[Sergey Valov]

Understand the classification of nuclear explosions and the damaging factors in each case. For reference, a ground explosion is an explosion at an altitude of 50 - 70 m.

[Alexey Lantukh]

As you can see, there is a shock wave at a 5-kilometer altitude. However, at an altitude of 50 meters it is a ground explosion, and at an altitude of 500 meters it is an air explosion with completely different characteristics.

[DenVB]

Quote: Alexey Lantukh

Firstly: airborne nuclear explosions do not create serious radioactive contamination.

It is better to hit pinpoint targets deep behind enemy lines with a ground explosion to create an infection. This will complicate the recovery of the affected object.

[Roman Efremov]

I’m talking about the airfields in the Nikolaev region from which these planes took off - in any case, they will fly across our territories, first new, then old.

[Roman Efremov]

So it’s time to contaminate the territories that we consider ours and are planning to liberate and make happy in the near future? Well, thank you, the Americans will be absolutely delighted! They only dream about this - when we start launching nuclear strikes on our own land! Thank you, brilliant strategists!!!

[Comet]

Quote: Roman Efremov

And when the radioactive cloud carries to the Krasnodar Territory and beyond, what will your D.U.R.A.K Karaganov offer?

Did everything go from Chernobyl to the Krasnodar region and beyond?

[Alexey Lantukh]

No, the cloud will carry to Poland. You just need to take into account the direction of the wind when hitting.

[Comet]

Quote: Alexey Lantukh

No, the cloud will carry to Poland. You just need to take into account the direction of the wind when hitting.

Exactly! For some reason, such a simple thing is incomprehensible to many here.

[Roman Efremov]

What if it doesn’t carry you or doesn’t carry you quite there? :-)

[Comet]

Quote: Roman Efremov

What if it doesn’t carry you or doesn’t carry you quite there? :-)

Well, I wrote to you above that you need to take into account the movement of air masses. A long-solved problem. What is not clear here? Where did the Chernobyl release go?

[Roman Efremov]

I’m talking about the airfields in the Nikolaev region from which these planes took off - in any case, they will fly across our territories, first new, then old.

[Comet]

Quote: Roman Efremov

I’m talking about the airfields in the Nikolaev region from which these planes took off - in any case, they will fly across our territories, first new, then old.

Is metrology also a pseudoscience?

[Pavel_Sveshnikov]

The radiation cloud from an airborne nuclear explosion is so weak that it is not even taken into account in model calculations. Radiation contamination is significant only in ground-based explosions. But in any case, it is advisable to select the wind in the desired direction.

[mikh-korsakov]

No, everything can be done in stages. Karaganov himself outlined the stages yesterday. First of all, he explained the flawed nature of our nuclear doctrine. Now, according to the existing doctrine, we can be the first to use nuclear weapons only in the event of a threat to the existence of the Russian state. The only advantage of this formulation is its vagueness. When does the threat occur? When an enemy drone fell on the Kremlin, one could refer to the fact that the president was in the Kremlin at that time, and he is the head of state, and that’s the threat. It is clear that THIS DOESN'T WORK. The West knows about this, so it does what it wants, no matter what color of the line we draw, because the total military potential of NATO exceeds the potential of the Russian Federation. Karaganov proposes to start by changing the nuclear doctrine, lowering the threshold for a forced decision to use. If this does not work, nuclear tests can be carried out, gradually increasing the charge power.

[Alexey Lantukh]

It's really very simple. F-16s will fly in and fire missiles, hitting something. Or the Taurus will hit something. This is a threat to national security. However, I believe that we should not wait for this, but should pre-empt and launch a nuclear strike on military targets in Ukraine, i.e. not on the territory of NATO countries. And this will be a signal of determination for a nuclear war with NATO. If you want, this is blackmail of Europe. It is quite obvious that Europe will not risk fighting with Russia for the sake of Ukraine, since this is already the third world war.

[Sergey Valov]

[/quote]deliver a nuclear strike on military targets in Ukraine[quote]

Read and listen to Putin carefully. He has repeatedly said that Ukraine is our territory, in slightly different words, of course. Are you proposing nuclear bombing of your own territory, albeit temporarily occupied?

[Pavel_Sveshnikov]

In the end, the western borders of the okarina can be bombed. For example, foreign crossings to Poland. And not necessarily megaton charges. Small bombs and little pollution. We can't live without a small strip of border territory. There will be fewer saboteurs running through it.

[DenVB]

Quote: Sergey Valov

Read and listen to Putin carefully. He has repeatedly said that Ukraine is our territory, in slightly different words, of course. Are you proposing nuclear bombing of your own territory, albeit temporarily occupied?

Oh, this security. Well, you can’t take propaganda chatter seriously.

[MBRSS]

Quote: Sergey Valov

listen to Putin. He repeatedly said that Ukraine is our territory

Not this way. He said, or rather hinted, that he would not mind if Poland laid claim to the western regions. That’s why we need to hit the western border in order to create a strip of light radioactive contamination. A sanitary belt, so to speak.

[I'm mine]

. The first target is the airfield in Starokonstantinov. 1 megaton is just right

But in Lvov, isn’t it more effective then? Why bother with the airfield so much? You're being too wasteful. Moreover, on the territory in which the referendum may have to be held

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Khariton

Karaganov has already suggested everything

Who is this and what did he offer?

[Msi]

Who is this and what did he offer?

Bald guy...
Here's what he suggested:
... in June 2023, on the pages of the magazine “Profile” and reprinting the material “Russia in Global Affairs”, he called for Russia to launch a preventive strike with nuclear weapons on targets in Central and Eastern Europe...

[nik-mazur]

Quote from Msi

Bald guy... That's what he suggested

It's clear. Another ̶e̶b̶... turbo-patriot, who, as befits turbo-patriots, is not responsible for anything, but only babbles with his tongue.

[Roman Efremov]

The sky above the neutral waters of the black mine and the sky of Ukraine are two different things.

[Poplar]

Quote: Roman Efremov

The sky above the neutral waters of the black mine and the sky of Ukraine are two different things.

What do you think: if our reconnaissance aircraft or drone appears over the neutral waters of the Red Sea or the Mediterranean, what will happen? Is this different?

[DenVB]

Quote: Poplar

What do you think: if our reconnaissance aircraft or drone appears over the neutral waters of the Red Sea or the Mediterranean, what will happen?

If the Americans suspect that our plane is coordinating attacks on their military bases or ships, they will shoot it down immediately.

[Ross xnumx]

A few hours before a series of attacks by militants of the Kyiv regime, an American RQ-4 Global Hawk reconnaissance drone and a Boeing P-8A Poseidon long-range radar reconnaissance aircraft were spotted in the skies over the Black Sea.

They should not be noticed, but destroyed as priority targets...
Otherwise there will be no point.
* * *
I can’t understand, is our Supreme Commander only brave in words or is he so “cautious” in life? Then how can we understand his words: “If a fight is inevitable, you need to strike first!” Is this posturing?!

[Gargon]

Quote: ROSS 42

“If a fight is unavoidable, you need to strike first!” Is this posturing?!

Well, they struck first and just in time.. Well, then here we are on the brink of a nuclear war and need to maneuver.. Time is on Russia’s side, the junta is running out of steam
I think so and it’s not worth flogging the fever just yet..

[NakedMan]

Well, then it’s on the brink of nuclear war and we need to maneuver

Well, we maneuver more, and they escalate. Maybe we should aggravate it and let them have a headache, how not to start a nuclear apocalypse?

[Pavel_Sveshnikov]

Unfortunately, in the West, our maneuvering is understood as weakness and will only become more impudent. Today, France and the United States promise to officially send NATO troops to the outskirts. It's called dolavali.

[fruc]

Ross xnumx
......is our Supreme Commander only brave in words or is he so “cautious” in life?

Stop scaring the West with weapons “unparalleled in the world”, now with “Sarmatians”, no one will understand this. It’s time to hit something serious so that these people who don’t understand will shudder, maybe not yao.

[Gargon]

Quote: frruc

Ross xnumx
......is our Supreme Commander only brave in words or is he so “cautious” in life?

Stop scaring the West with weapons “unparalleled in the world”, now with “Sarmatians”, no one will understand this. It’s time to hit something serious so that these people who don’t understand will shudder, maybe not yao.

Yes, I agree with you and the majority in Russia .. But what to do, how to force the authorities to allow the Military to fight for real, saving the lives of the best and most motivated soldiers? ..
It seems that the FABs began to mossize and successes on the fronts immediately became obvious..
And then on machine guns in assault groups ..And bloody targeted strikes..
Now I see the FAB, everyone who was completely shell-shocked even in the basements a hundred meters away .. The video is available online. The Khokhloskas ran.
This is something like Vasily’s opinion

[fruc]

I don’t care what they use to kill the Nazis (if we exclude nuclear weapons). There must be a rule for them - a corpse crawls out of a hole. And therefore more powerful and lethal weapons, attack drones and DRGs in their rear.

[MBRSS]

Quote: ROSS 42

I can’t understand, is our Supreme Commander only brave in words or is he so “cautious” in life?

Quick to deal with the internal opposition: Prigozhin, Strelkov, Udaltsov... There is no need to be particularly brave here.

“If a fight is unavoidable, you need to strike first!” Is this posturing?!

On the eve of the North Military District, he had even worse horror stories about the West: like, if they interfere with us, they will get it in such a way that it won’t seem like much. But in fact? But in fact, “This is some kind of... shame!” (c) Shvonder.

[Camrad]

I hope that at least after the elections our leadership will become a little more decisive and give the go-ahead to our air defense to deal with violators of flight restriction zones over the Black Sea.

[lis-ik]

Quote: Comrad

I hope that at least after the elections our leadership will become a little more decisive

After the “elections” our leadership will even more intensively request negotiations, privatize and sell off what is left.

[AAK]

I absolutely agree, there have been rumors about future negotiations throughout 2023, as well as the beginning of 2024... and if Medinsky, who was sweating and trembling in his voice in Istanbul, bravo croaked that if the homeland, in the person of Solntse-Face, orders, the tone is ready even more without mercy trembling in the voice to go to that same Istanbul again... It looks like the sanctions of mattresses and Geyrop residents are doing their job, our “Pinocchios” have already worn out all their teeth from the evil gnashing and since March 01, prices have again surged upward in stores

[Dutchman Michel]

Quote: lis-ik

After the “elections” our leadership will even more intensively request negotiations, privatize and sell off what is left

Will raise prices and retirement age

[Gargon]

Quote: Dutchman Michel

Will raise prices and retirement age

Up to 100 years and the dollar will be 200 ..)))))) Nightmare, it would be better if they surrendered to Hitler and would now drink Bavarian beer in the barracks of concentration camps with sausages from .... )))
I understand you correctly, I hope you are whiners of all stripes?
This is your dream of the fifth column and we, thank God, understood your whole vile and corrupt system

[Gargon]

Quote: lis-ik

Quote: Comrad

I hope that at least after the elections our leadership will become a little more decisive

After the “elections” our leadership will even more intensively request negotiations, privatize and sell off what is left.

Crimea is our Russian Seryoga and Navany you respect?
The short answer is Yes or NO! Everyone is waiting for an answer

[lis-ik]

Vitaly is good at driving a snowstorm, what does Crimea and Naval have to do with it?

[Gargon]

Quote: lis-ik

Vitaly is good at driving a snowstorm, what does Crimea and Naval have to do with it?

You yourself, Seryoga, drove the blizzard... Well, I’ll meet you too...
By the way, you didn’t answer the question, but it still leads to many thoughts
Yes or No We are waiting for men..
Do you respect Navalny and recognize Crimea as part of Russia?
Yes or no ?

[lis-ik]

Actually, I answered, read more carefully, but Navalny was exactly the same as the current government.

[Gargon]

Quote: lis-ik

Actually, I answered, read more carefully, but Navalny was exactly the same as the current government.

well done!
What is the current government like? Let's define yourself in more detail Seryoga

[lis-ik]

The same through and through liberal and corrupt.

[Gargon]

Quote: lis-ik

The same through and through liberal and corrupt.

Which one is good, in your opinion?
I lived under different authorities and I have something to compare with..What about you?

[Vladimir M]

I doubt that anything will change after the elections. Just “the goodness of our air defense” before the elections would “raise the rating”...

[Gargon]

Quote: Comrad

I hope that at least after the elections our leadership will become a little more decisive and give the go-ahead to our air defense to deal with violators of flight restriction zones over the Black Sea.

The signal to the West was clear... We will get everyone, in which case the means of destruction are the best in the world. But Russia doesn’t want war and still hopes to reach an agreement... This is the essence of the Russian world
We don't start wars, we end them!

[Neo-9947]

First with pills, then with surgery.
And if the disease is not treated, the patient will die if you just sit and hope for negotiations.
And there will be nothing and no one to finish it. We're in heaven, they'll just die.

[Roman Efremov]

Nothing will change after the elections - Putin does not want to be drawn into a war directly with the entire NATO.

[saved]

How do you even understand that they understood that there would be an attack, they even counted the planes, but there was no need to shoot them down?

[odometer]

Shooting down missiles is a priority. Far from planes

[pawn]

Quote: saved

How do you even understand that they understood that there would be an attack, they even counted the planes, but there was no need to shoot them down?

But it’s really strange - if they see that planes are taking off, they must be shot down immediately - or those planes are launching missiles at Crimea immediately after takeoff, in a minute, let’s say. And ours simply do not have time to shoot them down before they land again, without missiles.

[MBRSS]

Quote: peshik

And ours simply do not have time to shoot them down before they land again, without missiles.

Like that. They rise, then launch a missile and descend. In theory, to intercept, you need a MiG-31 on constant duty, with long-range missiles.

[km-21]

If Russia sits on the defensive, the Bridge will sooner or later be destroyed. To avoid this sad fate, the enemy must be severely punished for his insolence. Consequently, it will be necessary to bomb not only Ukraine, but also logistics hubs in Poland and/or Romania. And if they don’t understand, then continue in depth...

[Tagan]

Flood the island of small-shaven people and that’s it. After which the rest will crawl into holes.

[Leshak]

Consequently, it will be necessary to bomb not only Ukraine, but also logistics hubs in Poland and/or Romania.

Let's at least sort things out with Ukraine.

If Russia sits on the defensive, the Bridge will sooner or later be destroyed.

Have you not noticed the advance of the Russian Armed Forces? So, we haven’t been sitting on the defensive for a long time, but we’re moving forward where possible, and it’s working out quite well.

[km-21]

Objectively speaking, the offensive of the Russian Armed Forces is noticeable only against the backdrop of two years of trampling practically in one place. A radical turning point has not yet arrived; the prospects for war are vague. Even if the pace of the current offensive continues, even in this case the war will last for many years. The attacks on the bridge will last for the same number of years. And since there is no 100% protection for the bridge, sooner or later the missiles will break through to it. With all the ensuing consequences.

[Leshak]

Do you think that protecting the bridge is higher than the loss of life that will result from a thoughtless assault? The losses of the beginning of the Northern Military District should have taught us something, and our military is learning. There is no need to belittle the capabilities of our soldiers, much less insist on “meat assaults.”

[km-21]

Read my comment from 18:50 (sixth from yours).

[Neo-9947]

What kind of "meat assaults"?
Maybe we just need to START FOR REAL.
Postal service, telegraph, telephone, Internet, bridges, crossings, airports, seaports, POLITICAL and MILITARY leadership and the list goes on.
No need to reinvent the wheel.

[Leshak]

Quote: Neo-9947

POLITICAL and MILITARY leadership and further down the list.

I completely agree with this phrase.

[ergh081]

No need for promotion. It is necessary to create a buffer radioactive exclusion zone, following the example of Chernobyl. Only in Romania and Poland are there military hubs. And continue to live and develop “according to the newly established plan.” Let them lag behind by 50-70 years

[former soldier]

If Russia sits on the defensive, the Bridge will sooner or later be destroyed. To avoid this sad fate, the enemy must be severely punished for his insolence.

The United States already dealt a real blow to us in 22, which was heavier than the supply of weapons and the transfer of intelligence to Ukraine. This is the undermining of the Nordic Streams in the Baltic. I still can’t wrap my head around the fact that there was a sluggish reaction to this blow.

[pawn]

Quote: km-21

Consequently, it will be necessary to bomb not only Ukraine, but also logistics hubs in Poland and/or Romania. And if they don’t understand, then continue in depth...

Well, this is only in the case when all of Ukraine votes to join the Russian Federation, this is after ours liberate its entire territory.

[Mr. One Two]

Definitely throw in the munchies, rippers, etc. For some reason this option was left for later. The Anglo-Saxons are not shy, as always, so why should we be afraid? Everything that they could do that they could do, they have already done, then global P. I think we shouldn’t be shy and blame everything that harms us.

[next322]

Where are the MIG-31s ​​that are not “unparalleled” patrolling the Black Sea? Where is the satellite reconnaissance? Ukrainian planes safely shot back and left.......

[Skif3216]

"According to preliminary data, a certain amount of debris fell on the runway of Belbek airport." the last time when a ship under construction was hit, they also said that the attack on the Crimean bridge was repelled.

[ZAV69]

Over and over again they are hit by storms from the Nikolaev region. Or is it only me who can see it? The s400 battery is in ambush and there will be nothing to launch storms from

[Camrad]

That's how it all works. Of the 9 attacking enemy aircraft, one MiG-29 was shot down, one Su-24 was destroyed, the rest have not yet been confirmed. In previous raids, the percentage of kills was even higher, sometimes 100%.

[Vic Vic]

It’s great that we were able to completely repel a large-scale attack.
Nevertheless, “Six Su-24M bombers and three MiG-29 fighters were used to attack the Ukrainian Armed Forces.” If it was not possible to destroy these planes on the ground, maybe it is necessary to make some kind of ambush and guard the takeoff. American reconnaissance officers appeared in the sky, in addition to the readiness of our air defense to alert hunters of enemy aircraft and launchers that would soon erupt.
Do we see the takeoff of 9 enemy planes or not? How long is it from takeoff to missile launch? In the air, do we not have time or cannot (not reach) destroy enemy aircraft?
Where do the planes return to? Do we know? Is something flying there right away?

[wladimirjankov]

Do we see the takeoff of 9 enemy planes or not?

It seems that we don’t see if we allow their planes to take off, fly to the missile launch zone and go back. And so that we don’t see, they are purposefully working on our A-50U and IL-22 AWACS.

[Anchonsha]

The results are commendable, and therefore it is necessary to further improve our missile defense, as well as reconnaissance, in order to suppress enemy aircraft wherever they are. We just need more satellites

[Vladimir_D]

For the attack, 6 Su-24s and 3 MiG-29s were used in the third year of the Northern Military District. Is it possible to track aircraft hideouts?

[Festus]

Quote from vicvic

Do we see the takeoff of 9 enemy planes or not? How long is it from takeoff to missile launch? In the air, do we not have time or cannot (not reach) destroy enemy aircraft?
Where do the planes return to? Do we know? Is something flying there right away?

I would like to understand this too.

[evgen1221]

Ok, let’s assume that they take off from Ukrainian airfields. Okay, are they like fleas or do we not have satellites to monitor activity and where are the planes and where are the dummies? Why don’t they work proactively in advance? I hope at least something flew in after the fighters.

[Alex Starley]

It looks like you've reconsidered Hollywood combat science fiction. We have only one military active radio reconnaissance satellite, Pion-nx, which was put into operation in September 2022 and took 20 years to build. In terms of cost, it is possible as an ISS station. And even then it should be used to detect and escort warships in the oceans. Whether it is used over Ukraine, who knows, but it will fly over it for a total of 30-40 minutes per day.

[bone1]

The main question is where do the Ukrainians get so many combat-ready aircraft, and who should they hang for it?

[I'm mine]

One Su-24 carries two Storm Shadow missiles. There were six carriers. 12 missiles shot down. It turns out everyone is shot down
As of August 2023, the Ukrainians had 6 Su-24M and a dozen Su-24MR left, which they managed to adapt for these missiles. I don’t know exactly how many Su-24s were destroyed, but supplies seem to be coming from somewhere. I think India is bargaining. I don't trust these gypsies

[Ghost1]

According to calculations, a lot of things should have ended there, so not everything is so simple. The calculations are also not accurate.

[Dekabrist]

Boeing P-8A Poseidon long-range radar reconnaissance aircraft

The Boeing P-8A Poseidon is an anti-submarine patrol aircraft. In the USA, the AWACS aircraft is the Boeing E-3 Sentry. It's time to learn.

[Comet]

Quote: Dekabrist

Boeing P-8A Poseidon long-range radar reconnaissance aircraft

The Boeing P-8A Poseidon is an anti-submarine patrol aircraft. In the USA, the AWACS aircraft is the Boeing E-3 Sentry. It's time to learn.

For VO it has long been no difference.

[Rom8681]

Quote: km-21

If Russia sits on the defensive, the Bridge will sooner or later be destroyed. To avoid this sad fate, the enemy must be severely punished for his insolence.

Doesn't our leadership understand this?

[storm]

Looks like someone is making good money from repairing the Crimean Bridge....

[_Ugene_]

Six Su-24M bombers and three MiG-29 fighters were used to attack the Ukrainian Armed Forces

some time ago we recorded such massive takeoffs from the A-50 and even knocked down a decent number, but then two of our A-50s were shot down, as a result they again fly freely

[Comrade Kim]

Quote: krot

Reapers and the like..

Husnyat has already been destroyed for the second time, and four fiber optic cables of the filthy Americans have been cut.

They can!

[Yuri L]

According to unverified data, American flying vehicles such as RQ-4 and P-8A lack fuel for flight. The question is why our planes do not share fuel with them by irrigation, so that they more thoroughly explore the bottom of the Black Sea. Not once, very little. Amers They ask for irrigation, but they are not given it. It’s a mess.

[Sergei N 58912062]

To attack the Ukrainian Armed Forces, they used six Su-24M bombers and three MiG-29 fighters...

How many Ukrainian planes that took part in this attack were shot down?

... took off from the airbases of Kanatovo, Mirgorod, Starokonstantinov and Martynovskoye.

Why haven't these air bases been destroyed yet?

[Village]

Reflected, well done!
Let's not relax.

[Ivanov IV]

I do not get it.......
“an American RQ-4 Global Hawk reconnaissance drone and a Boeing P-8A long-range radar reconnaissance aircraft were spotted in the sky over the Black Sea” - ??????
If “they were noticed,” then why was the INTERCEPTION and SUPPRESSION not carried out?????
Are you really afraid of offending the Americans?? This has been repeated many times already.
Let's remember how Shoigu frightened.
And now it turns out he shit his pants?
“airbases Kanatovo, Mirgorod, Starokonstantinov and Martynovskoye” and how is that? Our people don’t know where these “bases” are located?

QUESTIONS - QUESTIONS....
Where are the answers?
AUTHOR - ????????

[mad-max78]

Quote: Maxim

the runway can be restored quite quickly

Where do they get planes to take off from these runways?

[sgrabik]

It’s strange how they can still take off with impunity and manage to launch their cruise missiles, don’t we monitor the airspace over Ukraine, because we have the S-400 long-range air defense system, we already have the S-500, and how they flew , they are still flying like this, it’s not in order, it is necessary to correct this somehow, and the sooner the better.

[Alexey G]

six Su-24M bombers and three MiG-29 fighters,

9 planes at a time. Not a little. And they say we destroyed all their aircraft!
Let's also attack...

[Vladimirius]

Let me remind you that more than six months ago a message came out that Zilya ordered the transfer of command centers for army and aviation units with corresponding communications to bunkers. They also hide planes, and they hide them for real and much more efficiently than ours; there remains a runway that they quickly restore. Ours successfully bomb ground-based buildings and takeoffs that are no longer discussed, without causing significant damage

[storm]

To attack the Ukrainian Armed Forces, they used six Su-24M bombers and three MiG-29 fighters, which took off from the air bases of Kanatovo, Mirgorod, Starokonstantinov and Martynovskoye.

These are the same “destroyed” aircraft of the UKRAINIAN Air Force, which for some reason take off from “long-destroyed” airfields.....
How is this possible???

[Lako]

For the umpteenth time, Ukrainians are trying to destroy this Crimean bridge. But in Kyiv they can rest assured about their bridges. For two years, not a single arrival. Did they take an oath on the Bible, or what?

[AlexWar]

To attack the Ukrainian Armed Forces, they used six Su-24M bombers and three MiG-29 fighters, which took off from the air bases of Kanatovo, Mirgorod, Starokonstantinov and Martynovskoye.

Where did 9 planes come from? Or the blows they are talking about do not reach their target at all.
Or maybe Ukraine stores planes at NATO airfields?
I already made a proposal to hit concrete plants, since they produce cement

[Yaroslav the Wise]

It seems that all Ukrainian planes were already destroyed last summer. Is not it so? At least that’s what Konashenkov claimed. Shoigu said the same thing. And then suddenly there are as many as SIX on you! bombers and a couple of fighters. Great! Fabulous. Apparently, Banderlog airplanes are printed on 3D printers.
I'm glad that the air defense-missile defense of the buns does not relax.