How the plan for a “small victorious war” with Japan failed

41
How the plan for a “small victorious war” with Japan failed
Russian poster of the beginning of the war: “Let's sit by the sea, wait for the weather”


Japanese Threat Assessment


The war with Japan was apparently one of the most predictable stories. The Japanese armed forces held a dress rehearsal for it during the Sino-Japanese War of 1894–1895. The Japanese launched a surprise attack on China, Chinese the fleet. The Japanese army landed in the Korean port of Chemulpo, where it was the most convenient place for landing. The Japanese will land there in 1904.



A number of sensible Russian military leaders understood all this very well. Unfortunately, no one in St. Petersburg heard their voice. Russia was not ready for war in the Far East.

Thus, on March 8, 1900, Russian Vice Admiral Stepan Osipovich Makarov handed over a note “Opinion on the organization of Port Arthur” to the Main Naval Headquarters. In it, he noted the insufficient ground defense of Port Arthur, which could lead to dire consequences. At least 447 guns were required to defend the fortress, but only 200 guns were assigned.

Makarov noted the fact that The Japanese will first of all occupy the Korean Peninsula, and the Russian fleet, cut off from its bases, will not be able to prevent their landing. Then the Japanese army will move to the Kwantung Peninsula and will be able to quickly concentrate more forces there than we have. As a result, it will be a war for the possession of Port Arthur. Port Arthur will become a symbol of the Russo-Japanese War. The fall of Port Arthur will deal a terrible blow to Russia's position in the Far East. Thus, the Russian admiral almost completely predicted the entire course of the future war.

In the pre-war period, in Russian high society there were widespread anti-Japanese sentiments. Admiral Pavel Tyrtov, manager of the Naval Ministry, responded to Makarov’s note with a long resolution, accusing the admiral of alarmism.


Russian naval leader, hero of the Russo-Japanese War, oceanographer, polar explorer, shipbuilder, Vice Admiral Stepan Osipovich Makarov (1849–1904). After the outbreak of the Russo-Japanese War, he was appointed commander of the Pacific Squadron on February 1 (14), 1904, and arrived in Port Arthur on February 24 (March 8). He supervised the actions of ships during the defense of Port Arthur, but soon died on the battleship Petropavlovsk, which was blown up by a mine.

In August 1903, Minister of War Alexei Kuropatkin, in a report to Emperor Nicholas II, said that the fortification of Port Arthur was at the final stage, and with a sufficient garrison and supplies it would be impregnable from land and sea. The garrison of the Kwantung Peninsula has been sufficiently strengthened, a year's reserve has been created and will withstand the blow of even the main forces of the Japanese army. A safe harbor is being created for the Pacific squadron, and it will be able to “calmly” measure its strength with the entire Japanese fleet.

As a result, Port Arthur, secured from sea and land, having a strong garrison and supported from the sea by a powerful fleet, represents an independent force. There are enough reserves in Port Arthur to wait for the moment when our troops in Manchuria can gather strength and defeat the Japanese army, liberating Port Arthur, Kuropatkin believed. Now you can “not worry” about Port Arthur’s isolation from Russia and the Amur region and even reduce spending on the defense of the Far East. As we see, Kuropatkin was decisively mistaken in his calculations. Makarov's assessment was much closer to the real picture.

On November 5, 1903, the head of the Provisional Military Staff of the Governor in the Far East, Major General V.E. Flug, handed over a report to Governor Alekseev, which outlined the scenarios for the Japanese offensive. The Japanese could:

1) limit the seizure of the Korean Peninsula;

2) having captured Korea and created bases there, direct the main attack on Russian troops in Southern Manchuria and Port Arthur;

3) deliver the main blow to Vladivostok and the South Ussuri region. At the same time, the Japanese armed forces could conduct a auxiliary operation to capture Sakhalin and the mouth of the Amur.

It was noted that for the war with Russia, Japan could transfer 10 divisions to the mainland in the first half of the second month: 130 battalions, 46 squadrons, 576 guns. In reality, Japan was able to field 13 divisions and 13 reserve brigades, more than 1 thousand guns. Against these forces, Russia could field (except for the garrisons of fortresses) 77 battalions, 75 squadrons and hundreds and 184 guns of the Far East troops; they could be concentrated no earlier than the beginning of the third month.

Thus, in the first period of the campaign, the Japanese army received a noticeable advantage. Only by bringing up reinforcements from Western Siberia and the European part of Russia, which could have been done no earlier than the seventh month of the war, could Russia concentrate superior forces.

It was clear that if Japan started a war, it was unlikely that its troops would sit in Korea and wait for the Russians to gather forces for a counteroffensive. Only by seizing the strategic initiative, a quick war scenario, with the available material and human resources, could Japan count on victory. The Japanese command was not stupid and was not going to wait in Korea until 6-8 months passed and the Russians transferred troops from Siberia and from the European part of Russia.

Flug's report gave the erroneous conclusion of the Chief of the Provisional Naval Staff that, given the current balance of forces of our and Japanese fleets, the possibility of defeating our fleet was not allowed. Therefore, it was believed that the Japanese would not be able to land troops in the West Korean Gulf or Yingkou (modern Chinese province of Liaoning). Rear Admiral Wilhelm Witgeft believed that the Japanese would be able to land on the western coast of the Korean Peninsula no closer than Jinampo (Tsinampo), or on the southeastern and eastern coast of the peninsula.

The Supreme Commander-in-Chief, Tsar Nicholas II, also had a contemptuous and disdainful attitude towards the Japanese Empire. The Russian emperor treated the situation in the Far East lightly and called the Japanese “macaques.” The Emperor declared that Japan did not have a real army, and if war broke out, our Japanese troops would easily defeat the Japanese. The public supported such jingoistic sentiments. The Japanese were not taken as a serious enemy. Like, they are Aboriginal savages who can easily be put in their place.

As a result, while the Japanese were rapidly militarizing the country, uniting the nation into a single fist, creating a military-industrial complex, an army and navy organized according to advanced Western European standards, purchasing the latest squadron battleships and cruisers (Japanese blitzkrieg), in Russia military preparations were carried out sluggishly and indecisively. The enemy was greatly underestimated.


Alexey Nikolaevich Kuropatkin (1848–1925, Sheshurino) - Russian military and statesman, Minister of War (1898–1904), member of the State Council. During the Russo-Japanese War, he successively held the positions of commander of the Manchurian Army (February 7 - October 13, 1904), commander-in-chief of all land and naval armed forces operating against Japan (October 13, 1904 - March 3, 1905), commander of the 1st Manchurian Army army

Preparing Russia for war


Reacting to the rise of Western powers in the Asia-Pacific region, especially Britain, Russia began to strengthen its forces in the Far East in the 1880s. Petersburg had a huge amount of time to prepare the Russian Far Eastern borders for war. By the beginning of the Sino-Japanese War, Russian forces in the Far East had been increased to 30,5 thousand people and 74 guns. But a significant part of the troops were Cossack cavalry.

In anticipation of Russian intervention in relations between Japan and China, the border districts were reinforced with artillery. The Amur Governor-General Dukhovsky received instructions to strengthen local formations and strengthen Vladivostok, Nikolaevsk and the defense of Sakhalin.

Military activities were carried out slowly. First of all, this was due to the fact that Russia’s main attention was focused on the Western strategic direction; the main funds and forces were constantly spent on strengthening military power in the European part of Russia. The main wars of the Russian Empire were fought in Europe. And the eastern direction was financed on a residual basis; it was long considered secondary, if not tertiary. Therefore, by 1898, the number of troops in the Far East reached only about 60 thousand people with 126 guns.


Port Arthur. General form. Photo from Niva magazine, 1904


Lack of financial resources, sparse population, lack of roads, the rudimentary state of engineering preparation for the theater of war, the lack of barracks and the general underdevelopment of the military and industrial infrastructure of the region delayed the concentration of troops in the Far East. Japan at this time accelerated the pace of military development, trying to prepare for war before the Russians completed construction of the Circum-Baikal Railway.

In 1898, when Russia occupied Port Arthur and relations between the two powers worsened even more, a new military development plan was adopted, which provided for increasing the number of Russian troops in the Far East to 90 thousand people and 184 guns. Russian participation in military intervention against China caused by the Boxer Rebellion in 1900–1901. (How the Russians took Beijing by storm), led to the transfer of troops from European Russia and the formation of a number of new units.

The tense situation in the Far East required more and more attention from St. Petersburg. Viceroy Alekseev was ordered “to bring our combat readiness in the Far East into full balance with our political and economic objectives in the shortest possible time and without stopping at the necessary expenses.”

In accordance with this instruction, they planned to form two new army corps with a total number of at least 50 thousand soldiers. These corps were supposed to concentrate in areas of possible Japanese landing. The strengthening of the army group in the Far East was carried out not by sending new units from the European part of Russia, but by reforming local formations to include separate groups of soldiers sent from the European part of Russia. This was done so as not to weaken the army in the western strategic direction.

They planned to transfer two divisions and one brigade to the Kwantung Peninsula, as well as strengthen Port Arthur and Vladivostok. Port Arthur received a fortress garrison and fortress artillery. In 1903, two infantry brigades with artillery were transferred to the Far East. The garrison on Sakhalin was also strengthened. Cavalry was not transferred to the Far East; it was believed that it was more needed in the European theater of military operations. In Manchuria they decided to limit themselves to Cossack cavalry concentrated in the border areas.


Postcard “Squadron battleship “Petropavlovsk”. Was the flagship of the 1st Pacific Squadron

Russian forces in the Far East


By the beginning of the war, Russia had about 98 thousand soldiers and 272 field artillery pieces in the Far East (in total there were about 125-150 thousand people east of Lake Baikal). The garrison of Port Arthur numbered 22,5 thousand people, in Manchuria there were about 28 thousand people, in the Vladivostok area there were about 45 thousand people. There were several thousand more artillery, engineering and other formations.

There was also a security guard for the CER (railway troops) - about 35 thousand people. The Trans-Siberian Railway was operating at the beginning of the war, but its capacity was low: 3–4 pairs of trains per day. It took about 1 month to transfer one army corps from the European part of Russia.

Although Russia had good relations with China, some troops had to be kept on the right flank to the detriment of the group in the most important eastern sector of the theater of operations. China was decentralized, and provincial governors and local generals did not always obey the center and pursued their own policies. Some of them could well cooperate with Japan. Behind the Pechili border stood the troops of the Chinese generals Yuan Shi-kai and Ma. Various gangs also carried out rampages in the provinces.

The war found the Russian army in a state of reorganization: two-battalion regiments were deployed into three-battalion regiments, brigades were transformed into divisions. Engineering preparations for the Far Eastern theater of operations proceeded slowly. The question of developing military infrastructure was raised only when the inevitability of war became obvious to almost everyone. The main attention was paid to strengthening Port Arthur and Vladivostok.


Portrait of Admiral E. I. Alekseev. A. F. Pershakov. According to some reports, Evgeny Ivanovich is the illegitimate son of Alexander II. On July 30, 1903, Alekseev was appointed Viceroy of His Imperial Majesty in the Far East. In this position, he showed extreme hostility towards Japan, supporting the desire of Russian industrialists to establish themselves in Korea and preparing a break with the Japanese government. In connection with the outbreak of the Russo-Japanese War, on January 28, 1904, Alekseev was appointed Commander-in-Chief of the ground and naval forces in the Pacific Ocean. After the death of Admiral Makarov, he directly commanded the Pacific Fleet until April 22. A number of major defeats of the Russian army forced the government to recall Alekseev from his position as commander-in-chief

The isolated position of Port Arthur required its powerful fortification so that the garrison could hold out for quite a significant period before the Russian army could launch a counteroffensive. The initial project for the fortifications of Port Arthur, the first stage, provided for a two-year construction period. However, various circumstances, such as the Chinese uprising, when workers simply fled, cholera epidemics, the remoteness of Port Arthur, and simply theft, slowed down the work. Construction work progressed slowly.

Since 1903, work has proceeded at a faster pace, but time has already been lost; the program for the construction of Port Arthur fortifications has not been fully implemented. They did not have time to implement the program for the construction of fortifications on the Jinzhou Isthmus (the small town of Jinzhou was located near the narrowest point of the Liaodong Peninsula, the most convenient place for the defense of the peninsula). The fortifications of Vladivostok were also not completed. The city could only repel the first weak attacks.

Thus, Russia, unlike the Japanese Empire, was not ready for war in the Far East. Work on strengthening Port Arthur and the Liaodong Peninsula and other fortifications were not completed; the railway did not allow the rapid transfer of troops from the European part of Russia. A sufficient army group was not concentrated in the Far East in advance, capable of resisting the Japanese army in Manchuria and Korea, or even preemptively occupying the Korean Peninsula, part of the coast of China and stopping the landing of Japanese forces.

We did not have time to reinforce the 1st Pacific Squadron. The detachment of Rear Admiral Virenius left Kronstadt for the Far East in 1903, but with the outbreak of the Russo-Japanese War it had to be returned from the Red Sea to Russia. The detachment could significantly strengthen the 1st Pacific Squadron. It included: the squadron battleship "Oslyabya", the 1st rank cruisers "Dmitry Donskoy" and "Aurora", the 2nd rank cruiser "Almaz", the destroyers "Buiny", "Brilliant", "Bystry", "Impeccable" ", "Bedovy", "Bodriy" and "Bravey", four destroyers, three steamships of the Volunteer Fleet "Orel", "Smolensk" and "Saratov".

The steamships of the Volunteer Fleet could be used as auxiliary cruisers for operations on enemy communications. It should be noted that, if desired, St. Petersburg could send most of the Baltic Fleet to the Far East before the war. Later, the 2nd Pacific Squadron was sent, but the decision was very late and led to disaster.


The squadron battleship Oslabya ​​leaves Bizerte, December 27 1903.

59 ships and vessels of various classes remained in Port Arthur. Including 7 squadron battleships - "Tsesarevich", "Retvizan", "Poltava", "Sevastopol", "Petropavlovsk", "Pobeda" and "Peresvet", the armored cruiser "Bayan", armored cruisers "Askold", "Diana" , "Pallada" and "Varyag". One cruiser and one gunboat of the Port Arthur squadron were located in the Chemulpo roadstead.

In September 1903, Rear Admiral Ewald Stackelberg moved with a detachment from Port Arthur to Vladivostok. The detachment included: armored cruisers "Russia", "Gromoboy" and "Rurik", armored cruiser "Bogatyr". The defensive detachment of Vladivostok also included the gunboats “Koreets”, “Manchzhur”, “Beaver” and “Sivuch”, several destroyers and torpedo boats, and transports.

True, the gunboats were unable to strengthen the Vladivostok detachment. The “Korean” died in Chemulpo; "Manchu" was in Shanghai during the outbreak of the Russo-Japanese War, where he was interned. At the beginning of the war, the "Sivuch" was under repair in Yingkou; when the Russian army retreated from Yingkou, the gunboat moved up the Liaohe River and was then blown up. The Beaver was in Port Arthur, the gunboat received severe damage from Japanese siege artillery fire and sank.


Armored cruiser "Gromoboy" in Vladivostok. 1904 Participated in the Russo-Japanese War as part of the Vladivostok detachment

Unfavorable political situation


The political situation for the start of the war was also unfavorable. The British Empire openly supported Japan. The United States also provided full diplomatic, financial, military and material assistance to the Japanese.

France, Russia's official ally, took a coolly neutral position. St. Petersburg should have taken a closer look at the position of its future Entente allies during the Russo-Japanese War and broken the alliance with France in order to avoid participating in the First World War as cannon fodder for London and Paris.

During this period, Germany was friendly towards Russia; it was beneficial for her that Russia would get bogged down in eastern affairs and be distracted from Western Europe. True, this did not stop the Germans from selling to Japan weapon and other products, business is business.


Anti-Russian satirical map prepared by a Japanese student at Keio University

The state of the Russian army. If it weren't for the generals


The Russian army in the second half of the 1877th - early 1878th centuries was in crisis, which was convincingly confirmed by the course of the Eastern War (Crimean), the Russian-Turkish War of XNUMX–XNUMX, the Russo-Japanese War and the First World War.

There were no complaints against the Russian soldier. Russian soldiers, as in previous times, showed courage and dedication. During the Russo-Japanese War, Russian soldiers and sailors showed exceptional heroism and resilience, which was repeatedly noted by foreign military agents stationed at the headquarters of the Russian and Japanese armies. The Russian non-commissioned officer corps was well prepared. Low- and middle-ranking officers also demonstrated the proper level of training.

The main problem was in the senior command staff. The royal generals, with some exceptions, turned out to be completely incapable of showing creative initiative. A feature of Russian (and then Soviet, which was confirmed by the initial stage of the Great Patriotic War) military education was overload with theory and lack of practice. Academic education suppressed common sense. Instead of practitioners, they brought up doctrinaires who were unable to understand and accept the new developments in military affairs. Conscious initiative was suppressed.

Future generals, in fact, were not taught to fight. Many of the generals occupied top command posts not so much because of their skills and merits, but because of their high origin, connections in high society, and the ability to please their superiors. They viewed service not as service to the Motherland and people, but as a source of material benefits and honors. Such “commanders” did not enjoy authority among the troops. These were generals of the “peaceful army”, incapable of innovation, initiative and decisive action. By the way, in my opinion, in the special military operation of 2022–2024. Russia has stepped on the same rake again.

The Russo-Japanese War completely confirmed the unsuitability of the generals. Kuropatkin accused his generals of disrupting a number of operations. Thus, General Bilderling during the battle of Liaoyang, having significant forces at his disposal, did not stop the encircling movement of Kuroki’s army. Kuropatkin blamed General Stackelberg for extreme indecision during the September offensive, as a result of which the well-planned operation failed. General Kaulbars failed the Mukden operation. Despite repeated orders and numerous reinforcements sent to him, he stubbornly did not go on the offensive and gave the enemy two days.

While Peter's practice worked - future generals began serving as soldiers, like Suvorov, the Russian army was invincible. But the system was broken. The generals were filled with sycophants, opportunists, careerists, and service workers who knew how to “serve beautifully” in peacetime. The highest positions were filled with sons, relatives of generals and aristocrats who had never smelled gunpowder. The degeneration of the elite of the Russian Empire fully affected the generals.

Suffice it to recall the illegitimate son of Emperor Alexander II, Admiral General Yevgeny Alekseev, who, being a member of the so-called. of the Bezobrazov clique, as the main commander of the Kwantung region and the imperial governor in the Far East, like no one else, he contributed to drawing Russia into the confrontation with Japan. At the beginning of the war, Alekseev was appointed commander-in-chief of all ground and naval forces in the Far East and was responsible for the failure of the initial period of the war.

The operational art was based on the doctrine of General Leer, who was based on the art of war of the Napoleonic Wars era. The military art of the era of the wars for German reunification has not been well studied. Only in 1907, on the instructions of the Chief of the General Staff Palitsyn, the Academy of the General Staff began to study the features of military art from the era of the wars of 1866 and 1870–1871.

Thus, Clausewitz's dialectic was completely not reflected by Leer. In addition to the tenets of Napoleonic art, defensive tendencies played an important role among the senior command staff of the Russian Imperial Army, which were combined with the recognition of the benefits of concentration for actions in internal operational areas. The generals, with some exceptions, did not study the experience of the Anglo-Boer War and the last Sino-Japanese War, which became a rehearsal for Japan for the Russo-Japanese War.






Russian propaganda posters from the Russo-Japanese War. Shows the degree of mischief-making sentiments in Russian society

Plans of the Russian command


Most military and political leaders believed that victory over the “weak” and “savage” Empire of Japan would be achieved with little effort, without disrupting the process of preparing for war in the West. The concept of a “small and victorious war.”

The plan for war with Japan, developed by the end of 1903 at the headquarters of Governor Alekseev, was based on optimistic assumptions about the superiority of the Russian fleet over the Japanese and the possibility of concentrating the Russian army in the Mukden-Liaoyang area before the arrival of the main Japanese forces. The Japanese army was underestimated, both in numbers and in terms of combat effectiveness.

Kuropatkin believed that the most important task of the army was “the concentration of our troops.” Until this moment, it was possible to sacrifice any local points and positions in order to prevent the enemy from defeating our weak army. Only by concentrating the main forces could it be possible to launch a counteroffensive.

It was believed that Japan would be able to transfer about 200 thousand people with 684 guns to Korea and Manchuria. The potential for growth of the Japanese army due to new mobilizations and the possibility of further transfers to Manchuria were considered unlikely. Based on such forces, it was assumed that the Japanese army would be able to develop an offensive in only one main direction: towards Vladivostok, Mukden or Port Arthur.

The possibility of simultaneous active offensive actions by the Japanese army in two operational directions, as well as the defeat of the Russian fleet, were not taken into account.

Already during the war, the unforeseen possibility of developing offensive operations of the Japanese army in two directions at once took the Russian command by surprise. Already on the way to Manchuria, Kuropatkin made a number of clarifications and amendments to the plan, suggesting that the Japanese army would first attack Port Arthur and at the same time, in anticipation of the offensive of the Russian troops, would strengthen itself in Korea.

The Russian army could begin active offensive operations no earlier than six months after the start of the war. They planned to achieve gain in time by defensive actions on a number of defensive lines - from the Yalu River, the Fenshuiling Range, etc. At the first stage of the war, it was planned to act as carefully as possible in order to prevent the enemy from being defeated in a decisive battle.

After concentrating sufficient forces, War Minister Kuropatkin planned to go on the offensive, oust the enemy from Manchuria and Korea, and then, if necessary, conduct an amphibious operation on the Japanese islands. The starting area for the Russian offensive was considered to be the Liaoyang-Haicheng region. From here it was possible to provide timely assistance to Port Arthur.



Great hopes were placed on the cavalry, in which the Russian army had a complete advantage. The cavalry had to wear down the Japanese infantry with its raids.

In addition, it was believed that the Japanese would not be able to organize the rear, the supply of ammunition, food, and this would lead the Japanese army into “moral and material disorder, which must be taken advantage of for decisive strikes.” However, as the course of the war showed, the Japanese did a better job organizing the rear than the Russian army, having thoroughly studied the theater of military operations in the pre-war period.

The tsarist generals were unable to use their advantage in strong cavalry to break through enemy lines, destroy communications, and wreak havoc and destruction in the style of future white and red commanders during the Civil War.

In general, Kuropatkin's plan, with initially weaker Russian forces in the Far East, could lead to success, but under two main conditions.

Firstly, it was necessary to implement it, which, given the low quality of a significant part of the high command, was a difficult task. The personnel problem ruined the best ideas.

Secondly, political support was needed in St. Petersburg. The Russian public should have calmly reacted to the period of concentration of the Russian army, when it would slowly retreat, losing position after position.

However, as the war showed, the public and high society were not ready for the retreat of the Russian army at the first stage of the war. Defeatist sentiments in St. Petersburg and pressure from the world community did not allow the Russian army to carry out Kuropatkin’s strategic plan and move on to the second stage - the offensive against the exhausted Japanese army. The Russian army was simply not given time to win.

The plan for the use of the Pacific Fleet, approved in December 1903, was wishful thinking. The high command practically missed the development of the Japanese fleet after the Sino-Japanese War, although the creators of the war plan were sitting not far from the Japanese shores - in Vladivostok and Port Arthur. The fleet was supposed to establish dominance in the Yellow Sea and prevent a Japanese landing in its base area.

At the same time, a small cruising detachment, based in Vladivostok, was supposed to operate on the enemy’s sea communications. Before the war, they did not think of seriously strengthening the Vladivostok cruiser detachment, although there were excellent opportunities for this. It was possible to use the ships of the Volunteer Fleet, which was created specifically to solve such problems. The organization of the cruising war in the Pacific Ocean in the pre-war period was a failure.

The war plan took into account the usual outbreak of hostilities after a declaration of war, but the fleet was not prepared to repel an attack by Japanese ships. Although the possibility of a surprise attack by the Japanese on the Russian squadron was foreseen at the Main Naval Headquarters and at war games, Makarov warned about this.

As a result, the calculation of the Russian command that the Russian fleet would dominate the sea, and therefore the Japanese would not be able to land on the northwestern coast of Korea and on the shores of the Liaodong Peninsula, failed.

41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    19 February 2024 05: 22
    Yes, there was no plan there.
    Totally.
    General.
    Everything was built on the fact that Japan would be afraid to fight with Russia.
    In principle, this was quite realistic if the Borodino fighters reached the theater of operations on time. Unfortunately, this did not happen, and could not have happened, if only because of the wrong choice of prototype for construction. Still, the Tsarevich was unreasonably complex in comparison with Retvizan.
    Still, discussions about military operations on land, excuse me, are in favor of the poor. The very fact of the start of large-scale hostilities on land meant the loss of the war. That's exactly how it happened.
    Russia did not need this war at all; it would have been easier to get an ice-free port in the Far East by having normal relations with Japan and sharing Korea with it.
    1. +3
      19 February 2024 13: 28
      Unfortunately, this did not happen, and could not have happened, if only because of the wrong choice of prototype for construction. Still, the Tsarevich was unreasonably complex in comparison with Retvizan.

      I’m not at all against your conclusion about the complexity of construction and the validity of the choice (I myself also think Retvizan is a better choice for RIF), but nevertheless, the speed of construction of the Borodino tanks took from 3 to 4 years, which is actually not such a bad indicator.
      Potemkin, for example, took 6 years to build)
      The point here is not so much the project, but the fact that they were laid down too late. It should have been at least a year earlier.
  2. +2
    19 February 2024 05: 30
    Nothing changes. Just as in the past the Anglo-Saxons found satellites to fight Russia, so today they use vassals to destroy it.
    Not only has criticism of the existing situation been made subject to prosecution under the law; Not only are mischief-making and temporary successes being positioned with wide publicity, but they are also engaged in some kind of theatrical elections... We win, then we’ll talk about which horse to change at the crossing.
    And someone else is misleading us with the greatness of the reign of Nicholas II - this is his losing war!!! The shameful canonization of the bloody Nikolashka is beyond any scope...
    This is our story... This is how it should be taught in school, so that from early childhood boys and girls understand what is “good” and what is “bad.”
  3. +13
    19 February 2024 05: 48
    History repeats in a spiral.

    “In the pre-war period, in Russian high society, in relation to Japan, mischievous sentiments were widespread.”

    “Future generals, in fact, were not taught to fight. Many of the generals occupied senior command posts not so much by skills and merits, but by high origin, connections in high society, and the ability to please their superiors. They viewed service not as serving the Motherland and the people, but as a source of material wealth and honors. Such “commanders” did not enjoy authority among the troops."
  4. +17
    19 February 2024 05: 55
    Hmm... History repeats itself. It’s like I read about SVO. There are indeed nuances, but that, as they say, is another story...
  5. +4
    19 February 2024 06: 07
    France, Russia's official ally, took a coolly neutral position. St. Petersburg should have taken a closer look at the position of its future Entente allies during the Russo-Japanese War and broken the alliance with France in order to avoid participating in the First World War as cannon fodder for London and Paris.
    As always practically, as with the same with the British, there are only their own interests with short-term alliances, and naturally only when it is profitable.
  6. +13
    19 February 2024 06: 24
    Japan was busy with self-isolation for a long time, so we must thank God that the Anglo-Saxons began to destroy the Russian Empire from the Far East at the hands of the Japanese so late. What
    As for Nicholas II, his court and the generals with the admiralty, they inherited from the former ruler a complete lack of understanding of the danger of such a large size of the Empire and the possibilities for the development of military and naval technologies in the West. Parades and reviews of the army by Nicholas and his court would have also included cavalry biathlon, but biathlon had not yet been invented by that time. It’s so good that the Admiralty did not decide to hold naval parades at the mouths of the Neva.
  7. +8
    19 February 2024 08: 14
    Errors at the strategic level cannot be corrected at the tactical level.

    The author is right that the blame for the defeat lies with the highest echelons of power. But the author is wrong that the army and navy themselves were well prepared - no one knew how to fight, not a soldier, not a sailor, not an officer. A continuous series of defeats on land and at sea is proof of this.

    The defeat of the Russian army on the battlefields in the First World War is another confirmation of this. We could cope with the Austrians, but we constantly lost to the Germans. Our army was no longer the steamroller it was in the 18th and first half of the 19th centuries and what it became in the second half of the 20th.
    1. 0
      19 February 2024 14: 31
      Quote: S.Z.
      The author is right that the blame for the defeat lies with the highest echelons of power. But the author is wrong that the army and navy themselves were well prepared - no one knew how to fight, not a soldier, not a sailor, not an officer. A continuous series of defeats on land and at sea is proof of this.

      Near Liaoyang, the Russian army repels all enemy attacks, the Japanese command gives the order to withdraw - as if somewhat contradicting your conclusions about the complete inability to fight.
      1. +4
        19 February 2024 15: 32
        Quote: Trapper7
        somewhat contradicts your conclusions about the complete inability to fight.


        Not “complete inability to fight,” but insufficient ability to fight for victory. There were also successful battles in the First World War, but overall everyone lost. There were terrible defeats in the Second World War, but they won it, that is, they showed sufficient skill to win.
  8. +1
    19 February 2024 08: 25
    France, Russia's official ally, took a coolly neutral position. St. Petersburg should have taken a closer look at the position of its future Entente allies during the Russo-Japanese War and broken the alliance with France in order to avoid participating in the First World War as cannon fodder for London and Paris.

    Russia breaks the alliance with France. Germany flies into France. After the defeat he goes east. Only there is RI, not the USSR. Therefore, the war ends in complete defeat. wassat
    1. 0
      19 February 2024 20: 17
      Quote: BlackMokona
      Russia breaks the alliance with France. Germany flies into France. After the defeat he goes east. Only there is RI, not the USSR. Therefore, the war ends in complete defeat. wassat
      Russia breaks the alliance with France. Germany flies into France. After the defeat, he continues the war with England and tries to digest the French colonies. Russia grows rich by trading during the war instead of or together with the United States. If, after the victory over England, Germany rushes towards Russia, then their depleted reserves will be opposed by a country that has not yet fought, but whose military-industrial complex is promoted to its fullest (the Germans’ workers were taken to the front, so they would not only buy hemp from us) .
      1. +1
        20 February 2024 08: 43
        Quote: bk0010
        Russia breaks the alliance with France. Germany flies into France. After the defeat, he continues the war with England and tries to digest the French colonies. Russia grows rich by trading during the war instead of or together with the United States. If, after the victory over England, Germany rushes towards Russia, then their depleted reserves will be opposed by a country that has not yet fought, but whose military-industrial complex is promoted to its fullest (the Germans’ workers were taken to the front, so they would not only buy hemp from us) .

        We already went through this in WWII. Germany took out France, could not strangle Britain and went to Russia. It will be the same here.
        And how can we deplete it? If the Germans had had enough reserves at the first stage of the war, the war with France would have been won in a couple of months, just like in WWII. But England cannot deplete anything, it cannot even bomb like in WWII. winked
        1. 0
          20 February 2024 16: 37
          Quote: BlackMokona
          We already went through this in WWII. Germany took out France, could not strangle Britain and went to Russia. It will be the same here.
          It is highly likely that they took such an adventure precisely because Russia merged into WWI on the eve of victory. We decided that it worked then and will work now.
          Quote: BlackMokona
          And how can we deplete it? If the Germans had had enough reserves at the first stage of the war, the war with France would have been won in a couple of months, just like in WWII
          The speeds are not the same for a couple of months, there are not enough trucks. What did they lack reserves for? Let me remind you that Schlieffen’s plan was that while part of the troops tied up the French army in battles on the border, the other, through Belgium, bypassed the fortified areas and occupied Paris. But the French darted from the border with such speed that both groups approached Paris at the same time. Then the French came to their senses and stood to death. I don’t think that a bunch of Landwehr would fundamentally change anything here.
          Quote: BlackMokona
          But England cannot deplete anything, it cannot even bomb like in WWII. winked
          She can choke with a blockade, as she did. Again, I’ll just remind you that during WWI there wasn’t a single enemy soldier in Germany, their economy collapsed, there was nothing to eat. And we must not forget that the British had an abundance of manpower in the colonies.
      2. 0
        20 February 2024 10: 52
        What depleted reserves? The French are quickly taken out, the British cannot do anything to the Germans. The Germans give the Russians an ultimatum - either you sign up for us and supply us with whatever we say (that is, essentially become a colony), or we will take the resources for free. Russia could not withstand the confrontation with the Austrians with the support of a small part of the Germans, the chances against both of them are zero.
  9. +7
    19 February 2024 09: 10
    “How the plan for a “small victorious war” with Japan failed”
    In a nutshell, then - miserably.
  10. +5
    19 February 2024 10: 01
    True, the gunboats were unable to strengthen the Vladivostok detachment.

    All the gunboats listed by the author are still sailing-screw ships built in the 19th century with ancient guns that still used black gunpowder and the same ancient horizontal steam engines. These ships had no combat value at the beginning of the Russo-Japanese War.
    1. +2
      19 February 2024 14: 45
      Quote: Dekabrist
      These ships had no combat value at the beginning of the Russo-Japanese War.

      In principle, they could shoot along the shore. Anything is better than driving a Novik for these purposes
      1. +3
        19 February 2024 15: 57
        In principle, they could shoot along the shore.

        Only "in principle". You still have to get to the shore. Under the dominance of the Japanese fleet at sea.
        1. +5
          19 February 2024 19: 12
          Quote: Dekabrist
          You still have to get to the shore.

          And they got there - the gunboats fired at the shore repeatedly
    2. +2
      19 February 2024 23: 34
      Quote: Dekabrist
      These ships had no combat value at the beginning of the Russo-Japanese War.

      In the Vladivostok detachment, perhaps this is the case. But in Arthur, gunboats were one of the most sought-after ships. And shoot along the shore, and guard the roadstead...
      Although the gunpowder was smoky, the advancing infantry and destroyers with fire ships did not find it enough.
  11. +10
    19 February 2024 10: 16
    The war found the Russian army in a state of reorganization: two-battalion regiments were deployed into three-battalion regiments, brigades were transformed into divisions.

    It’s always like this, with war on the horizon, we have a reorganization, no communication, management is haphazard, underestimating the enemy. Nothing changes in our country. This is already a kind of tradition.
  12. +10
    19 February 2024 11: 20
    “St. Petersburg should have taken a closer look at the position of its future Entente allies during the Russo-Japanese War and broken the alliance with France in order to avoid participating in the First World War as cannon fodder for London and Paris.”

    The author is not only poorly acquainted with the REV of 1904-1905 and broadcasts multiple conjectures, not based on documents.
    But he doesn’t understand the cause and effect of I MB. He doesn’t remember well the school history course: the union of the monarchical empire and the republican state was formalized by an agreement in 1891 and a secret military convention. August 18, 1892. On August 27, 1892, the agreement was supplemented by a military convention signed by the chiefs of the general staffs of Russia and France. The parties pledged to provide mutual assistance in the event of an attack by Germany or Austria-Hungary on Russia or by Italy and Germany on France. (The alliance was later confirmed by the Russian-French Naval Convention of 1912).

    France pledged to field 1 million 300 thousand soldiers, and Russia - from 700 to 800 thousand. The convention emphasized that in the event of hostilities, these forces would have to be quickly and completely pulled up to the borders with Germany, so that she would have to fight the war in both the east and the west. According to the convention, the parties were obliged to provide intelligence information about the number of troops and the steps taken by the countries of the Triple Alliance. The Convention remained in force as long as the Triple Alliance existed.
    And from the history of the beginning of WWII it is known that Germany declared war on Russia on August 1, 2014, France, fearing that it would be left alone with the German army when they defeated the Russian army, declared war on Germany on August 3, 1914.
    So this military convention saved Russia from defeat in the first months of WWII.
    And further on in this article - the author’s blatant amateurism.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +1
      20 February 2024 00: 47
      France, fearing that it would be left alone with the German army when they defeated the Russian army, declared war on Germany on August 3, 1914.
      So this military convention saved Russia from defeat in the first months of WWII.

      But at the same time, it’s probably worth remembering that previously both Germany and Austria were allies of the Republic of Ingushetia. Relations were spoiled by the efforts of the previous Romanovs, Nicholas 1 and Alexander 2. And then, through the efforts of Alexander 3, supposedly the “Peacemaker,” relations with Germany were completely destroyed and a strange alliance with distant France was born. Not without the help of French loans, again, they paid for them by draining their own industry to the French.
      1. +1
        20 February 2024 10: 55
        There is nothing strange about this. The balance of power on the continent has changed. France has ceased to claim the role of continental hegemon, but Germany has become the opposite. The hegemons, as practice shows, always cannot cope with Britain and go east. Therefore, its confrontation with Russia was inevitable sooner or later, hence the search for allies.

        And there were no alternatives to industrial development through French loans, since Germany could not provide similar funds.
        1. 0
          21 February 2024 00: 31
          Quote: Kmon
          And there were no alternatives to industrial development through French loans, since Germany could not provide similar funds.

          Couldn't or didn't want to? Let me remind you that Alexander 3 confiscated German property in the western provinces. Which of course did not increase the Germans’ desire to invest.
          1. 0
            21 February 2024 01: 47
            As far as I remember, Germany spent almost all of its funds on the active development of its own industry, so, unlike France, it could not invest in Russia even if it wanted to, and it did not have the opportunity to tie it to itself with loans.
  13. ANB
    +3
    19 February 2024 13: 30
    . future generals began their service as soldiers, like Suvorov,

    Did Suvorov actually serve as a private?
    Or, as was customary among nobles then, he was assigned to the regiment from childhood. And he entered the service as an officer.
  14. -4
    19 February 2024 14: 51
    So Russia was already preparing a landing force for Japan. The revolution got in the way. And Nippon had more losses than Russians
  15. 0
    19 February 2024 14: 59
    “The cavalry had to wear down the Japanese infantry with its raids” - while the cavalrymen themselves criticized such tactics, they believed that endless “reconnaissance” only exhausted and bled our own valuable cavalry resource, without achieving real success (deep breakthroughs), for which this branch troops was intended.
  16. +1
    19 February 2024 18: 27
    History repeats itself
    When talking about the “fifth column” comes up, an episode is often mentioned about how pre-revolutionary intellectuals congratulated the Japanese emperor on his victory over Russia. For a hundred years now this story has been told in various details.
    For example: “It’s mind-boggling, but during the Japanese celebrations in honor of the victory over Russia in the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-1905, the Japanese Mikado was given a telegram in which the Russian intelligentsia congratulated Japan on the victory.

    There is a street "1905" in Moscow. The main thing is that the street "2024" does not appear
  17. 0
    19 February 2024 18: 28
    On the poster there, as always, Zelensky is begging.
  18. +5
    20 February 2024 01: 02
    The author wrote quite correctly that the REV was the most predictable war of that time. This was known and understood, including in the Republic of Ingushetia, and they themselves willingly went towards war, aggravating relations for the sake of generally small commercial enterprises. (concessions on the Yala, for example).

    It seems that preparations began on time, and the plans were drawn up quite reasonable. It was planned to strengthen the fleet and deploy the army. But there was no clear control over the implementation of these plans. The entire top management of the Republic of Ingushetia was busy with some momentary issues, trying to earn something for their personal pocket from the same plans. As a result, everyone sees that the schedule lags behind that of Japan, but no one wants to lift a finger to correct the situation that threatens RI in their favor. Moreover, there were many opportunities for this. This war was really lost by the elite of the empire; there were no objective reasons for such a humiliating defeat from a much weaker enemy.
    1. +2
      20 February 2024 10: 56
      There were objective reasons. The Japanese fleet was much stronger, the army was more motivated, the generals and admirals were more adequate.
      1. +2
        20 February 2024 14: 57
        Was the Japanese fleet much stronger? - Well, you bent it. By the beginning of the REV, Japan was a second-rate naval power, unlike us, but you have to be able to love everything the way our admirals did.
        1. 0
          20 February 2024 16: 53
          Well, yes, if you compare not with all the RI fleets at once (which were impossible to concentrate at one point), but with individual flotillas. And it’s not only about the admirals, but also about the disgusting training of the personnel and the weak performance characteristics of the ships. And the emnip gunpowder was of poor quality.

          So we were also not a first-class naval power. No one more serious than the Turks and Swedes have ever been defeated at sea, unlike the British, French, Spaniards, etc.
          1. +1
            20 February 2024 18: 30
            I agree with you that with the advent of the steam era we did not defeat anyone serious, but if we approach the issue formally, then in terms of the number of ships of the line, by the beginning of the REV we shared 2-3 place with France (20 versus 6 Japanese). Quite a first-class maritime power. Well, as for the preparation of l/s and performance characteristics of ships, then it all comes down to the highest command staff (admirals), their competence and professional suitability (or rather the lack thereof), as well as the general backwardness of our industry, so that our “crystal bakers” are there "They didn't crunch. Yes, the unfortunate geographical location played a role, but, I think, with the proper level of professionalism and competence, this problem could be somehow leveled out.
  19. 0
    20 February 2024 15: 28
    The main problem was in the senior command staff. The royal generals, with some exceptions, turned out to be completely incapable of showing creative initiative. A feature of Russian (and then Soviet, which was confirmed by the initial stage of the Great Patriotic War) military education was overload with theory and lack of practice. Academic education suppressed common sense. Instead of practitioners, they brought up doctrinaires who were unable to understand and accept the new developments in military affairs. Conscious initiative was suppressed.

    Future generals, in fact, were not taught to fight. Many of the generals occupied top command posts not so much because of their skills and merits, but because of their high origin, connections in high society, and the ability to please their superiors. They viewed service not as service to the Motherland and people, but as a source of material benefits and honors. Such “commanders” did not enjoy authority among the troops. These were generals of the “peaceful army”, incapable of innovation, initiative and decisive action. By the way, in my opinion, in the special military operation of 2022–2024. Russia has stepped on the same rake again.

    How right the Author is! For all 100!!! With all the consequences...
  20. +1
    20 February 2024 17: 31
    "Korean" died in Chemulpo

    Amazing ignorance of the battle between the Varyag and the Korean in Chemulpo.
    The Korean gunboat also took part in the battle against the squadron of Vice Admiral Uriu Sotokichi. In the battle, she did not receive more than one hit, and the captain decided to blow up the gunboat, which was done.
    They wanted to blow up the heavily damaged Varyag, but the commanders of the British and French cruisers opposed it, and the cruiser was scuttled. Then the Japanese raised it, after the war, Nicholas II bought it.
    Having made the transition from Vladivostok to Romanov-on-Murom (now Murmansk), the Varyag replenished the flotilla of the Arctic Ocean.

    The heroic ship found the February and then the October revolutions in the British port. After the Bolsheviks seized power, the government of the young Soviet republic declared that the tsar's debts were not theirs, refusing to pay for the ship's berthing and repairs. Then "Varyag" was confiscated to pay off the debt by the British and later sold to a German company for scrapping for metal. In 1925, when the Germans decided to tow the ship for disposal, during the towing process it sank in the Irish Sea due to a strong storm. Apparently the cruiser preferred death at sea to inglorious transformation into scrap metal.
    All the battles in Manchuria were lost, given the superiority of the Russian army.
    All naval battles of the 1st squadron of the Pacific Fleet too. And Tsushima and the death of 2,3 squadrons of the Pacific Fleet only completed a series of failures for the Russian army and navy.
    Port Arthur and Dalny (Liaondong Peninsula) were occupied by the Japanese.
    According to the Portsmoort Peace Treaty, the Japanese ceded the Kuril Islands (both ranges) and the southern part of Sakhalin Island.
    No indemnities were paid to Japan.
    40 years later, the Red Army troops will recapture the Kuril Islands, southern Sakhalin, liberate the Korean Peninsula to the 38th parallel, and northern China, landing airborne assaults
    in Mukden, Port Arthur and other cities.
  21. +2
    22 February 2024 22: 28
    The reasons for the collapse of the plan for a “small victorious war” with Japan were most succinctly and succinctly expressed by General Dragomirov: “The Japanese are macaques, but we ourselves are like that!” Shap-kicking seems to be in the blood of the Russians throughout almost the entire military history. First - contemptuous boasting in advance and teasing the enemy, and then - forced sobering, accompanied by considerable soldierly blood and deprivation for its population.
  22. 0
    24 February 2024 18: 21
    How useless Nikolashka was - so were those around him
  23. 0
    Today, 14: 37
    Правда, в том что касается военной науки, в современной РФ действительно отчасти следовали советским канонам (до 2005 года боевой устав был практически советский), ориентированным на большую войну с применением ОМП, но попутно произошла другая деформация - сокращение армии (и отсечение мобпотенциала в лице частей сокращенного состава) в ходе военной реформы, что исключало применение советской тактики. Затем "доктрина Герасимова" , которая отражала как раз современный западный взгляд на войну и к этому готовила армию. Война рассматривалась как "сетецентрическая", очень маневренная, с использованием небольших хорошо вооружённых соединений (опора на БТГр) и сил специального назначения и высокоточного оружия. Готовились также к противопартизанским действиям. И противодиверсионным.
    Ну, и опыт соответственно опирался на Чеченскую и Сирийские компании, с учётом которых произошли и изменнения в уставе в 2014м году.
    А война оказалась в совсем другом стиле. Так что в этом ситуация с русско-японской отличается. Как раз подвела охота за новомодными тенденциями с одной стороны. С другой - проворонили целый ряд тенденций - например, малые беспилотники.
    А про генералитет, оторванность от жизни - все верно.