Japanese airliner MRJ-SpaceJet - a failed Mitsubishi project

16
Japanese airliner MRJ-SpaceJet - a failed Mitsubishi project

The regional air travel industry experienced a renaissance in the 1990s, giving rise to relatively small players such as Embraer and Bombardier creating their own regional hits. The Japanese, who have long sought to take their rightful place in the industry, also saw their chance in the new jet trend.

The project of an aircraft for regional air transportation did not threaten significant costs and did not imply fierce competition with such giants as Boeing and Airbus, whose contractors were many Japanese companies.



In 2002, the Japanese government initiated a research program to develop this vision. The competition for this government order was won by MHI (Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Group), primarily widely known for its cars. Meanwhile, the auto industry is just one division of a giant conglomerate that works in many areas: from air conditioners and trains to space launch vehicles and submarines, and is also a contractor aviation giants producing aircraft under license.

With this basis, they decided to develop their own airliner. Initially, a small aircraft for 50 passengers was planned with a narrow fuselage, which increased the aerodynamic properties of the machine. At the same time, the newest aircraft was supposed to receive the design of larger aircraft with an engine under the wing.

The project was officially announced in 2007 at the Paris Air Show and was named MRJ (Mitsubishi Regional Jet). The plane was presented as a concentrate of advanced technologies: a comfortable cabin, the latest electronics, a body made of composite materials, etc. In Japan itself, the new product was presented as a national project.

However, too many mistakes and miscalculations did not allow the production of these ambitious airliners to go into series production. However, at the same time, Mitsubishi still gained invaluable experience, although it cost them a decade and a half of work and several billion dollars.

16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -2
    15 January 2024 14: 59
    Yes, in aviation they love invaluable experience worth lards of dollars. Just this morning I remembered about the RAH-66 Comanche helicopter.
    1. +1
      15 January 2024 15: 13
      so what about the A50? I don’t care about these Japanese candy wrappers. what is there to block? and it’s already clear to everyone that trouble has happened. And there are vague doubts... it’s not easy to drop such a board. Did you fall under the “friendly” category again? Someone needs to change somewhere...
      1. 0
        15 January 2024 15: 33
        I have no idea, but for some time now I have not been interested in the real reasons why our sides fell in one case or another. It was enough for me to see how the situation developed in the information field with the loss in May 2023. Thank you, I don't want any more.
        1. -1
          15 January 2024 15: 37
          what is there then? chasing empty words?
          1. -2
            15 January 2024 15: 40
            I think I commented on the news about the Japanese jet.
    2. 0
      15 January 2024 16: 45
      You will also remember the Tu-86\96 family. How many have you produced since the 80s? But the project is still alive. wassat hi
    3. 0
      17 January 2024 12: 16
      Especially in this article!
      ! Only one conclusion: .... a decade and a half and lards of expenses
  2. 0
    15 January 2024 15: 01
    Everyone begins to understand that their own is good.
  3. +2
    15 January 2024 15: 05
    It would seem that, unlike Russia, which is cut off from the market for advanced technologies, Japan has full access and should have made an advanced aircraft. But no, the design thought was not enough.
    Japan, like Europe, is no longer the same.
    1. -2
      15 January 2024 15: 39
      Should I say something about the damn thing?
  4. 0
    15 January 2024 16: 21
    Empty. The allies didn’t let me in. The Entente 100 years ago, and now they have pulled blankets (more than one) in their direction.
  5. +5
    15 January 2024 16: 30
    To the question that Russia is such a backward country. We make all types of aircraft, we develop something from the Soviet legacy (we didn’t waste it), which we did already in the modern period (Su-57, superjet, MS-21, Mi-28). And this is mainly done on our own, under sanctions and prohibitions, in a limited sales market. The example of MRJ is very indicative - a rich country, a giant technology company, components from all over the world without restrictions, a global sales market, seemingly not at all stupid and hardworking Japanese engineers... And at the end - bang. Or bang. Learn to appreciate the work of our people who work in the aviation industry. From general designers to assemblers.
  6. 0
    15 January 2024 19: 02
    Why is this an article about regional airlines, but no one mentioned SuperJet. Well, purely for the sake of starting a fruitful discussion. Pogosyanov’s work is flying.
  7. +1
    20 January 2024 01: 03
    I don't see a failed plane. It’s just that this kind of plane is not needed right now. If there were no strong competitors, I would fly without problems.
  8. +1
    2 February 2024 04: 12
    MRJ, without exception, vying with each other to predict a wonderful future; there was a ready market for US domestic lines for it. And it turned out like this.
    1. 0
      4 February 2024 22: 05
      Apparently, they considered that the US domestic market was not enough. The same Embraer almost voluntarily parted with this market, because... Narrow-body aircraft have become popular in “external” markets. But there is strong competition with Airbus (A-220).