Trafalgar naval battle

30
Trafalgar naval battle
"Battle of Trafalgar", painting by W. Clarkson-Stanfield, painted in 1806


Most recently we talked about Bonaparte's Egyptian campaign and naval battle of Abukir, about the political situation in Europe on the eve of the War of the Third Coalition, about the causes and beginning of this war. Napoleon was preparing an invasion of England, the British were feverishly looking for allies whose armies would fight Bonaparte in Europe, distracting him from his plans to conquer their proud island. As you know, the British found allies - and they miserably lost this war. But England was saved. And the main battle of that war for the British themselves was the famous naval battle of Trafalgar. It is often said that in it England lost its best admiral, and France lost its fleet and hope of remaining a great naval power. The Battle of Trafalgar is traditionally included among the four largest naval battles in the world. stories - on a par with Salamis, Lepanto and Tsushima. The Battle of Trafalgar will be discussed in this article.



On the eve


On September 17, 1805, Napoleon signed an order according to which the Franco-Spanish squadron was to finally leave Cadiz and go to Cartagena, where other Spanish ships were to join it. At Toulon they were to take on French landing troops and proceed to Naples to support Saint-Cyr's army and also to threaten Egypt. The unsuccessful Vice-Admiral Pierre-Charles de Villeneuve had to surrender command to Count François-Etienne de Rosely (a famous French hydrographer and cartographer) and come to Paris “to give an explanation.” He received the letter with the order on September 27, and in order to save his honor, he decided to lead this expedition himself. For a long time he did not dare to go to sea, but now, when he was already in virtual retirement, he was eager to go into battle. But the Spaniards were against it. Admiral Federico Gravina pointed out that many sailors were sick, the crews were understaffed, the recruits were poorly trained, and the period of autumn storms was approaching. Villeneuve replied that

“The fall of the barometer should not serve as an excuse for the decline of courage and allied duty.”

Meeting with the British


On October 19, French and Spanish ships left the harbor of Cadiz and headed for Gibraltar. In the early morning (about 5 hours 30 minutes) of October 21, British ships were discovered near Cape Trafalgar, they were led by Horatio Nelson, from whom the French admiral fled during the battle of Aboukir. And now Villeneuve himself had lost his courage: after much hesitation, he gave the order to turn back - to Cadiz. At about 8 o'clock in the morning a signal was raised: "Jibe, all of a sudden, heading north, in reverse order"- the vanguard ships now became the rearguard. This maneuver took two hours, and the battle formation was disrupted - “distance gaps” appeared; now the ship following could not protect the stern of the one in front. Some ships, in order not to collide with their neighbors, did not break down at all, which now looked like a crescent curved to the right - towards the shore. Nelson, intending to cut the enemy fleet into three parts, lined up his ships in two columns.


The plan was very bold, even risky, since the British ships approached the enemy at a heading angle of almost 90 degrees and therefore could not use their artillery. And enemy ships could hit them with volleys of onboard cannons. But the wind and ocean waves were favorable for the British.

Correlation of forces


What forces did the admirals of the opposing sides have at their disposal? Nelson had 27 battleships, 4 frigates and 1 schooner at his disposal. Villeneuve led a fleet of 33 battleships (18 French and 15 Spanish), 5 frigates and two brigs. As for the battleships, in Nelson's squadron 4 of them were ships of the first rank, 4 of the second, 20 of the third. In the unified Franco-Spanish navy there were 4 battleships of the first rank and 29 of the third. Villeneuve flew his flag on the 80-gun ship Bucentaure, which was covered by the Spanish 144-gun ship Santissima Trinidad (Holy Trinity).


Santísima Trinidad, model of a ship in the Science Museum of Valladolid

Federico Gravina's flagship was the 112-gun battleship Principe de Asturias. Nelson was on the famous 104-gun battleship Victory, which had previously been the flagship of the talented British Admiral John Jarvis (Nelson served under Jarvis and learned much from him). Victory was only slightly younger than Nelson - laid down at Chatham on July 23, 1759 and launched in 1765. But in 1799-1803. this ship was undergoing repairs and was literally rebuilt log by log; they say that the cost of such reconstruction exceeded the cost of construction. Victory outlived Nelson, it remained in service until 1812, and then it was put into “eternal berth” in the city of Portsmouth:


Nelson's deputy, Vice Admiral Cuthbert Collingwood, sailed on the 100-gun Royal Sovereign.


Cuthbert Collingwood in a portrait by Henry Howard

Among the French battleships was Swiftsure, which, as part of the English fleet, took an active part in the naval battle of Aboukir and successfully attacked the French flagship, L'Orient. It was the Swiftsure sailors who then presented Nelson with a coffin made from a piece of the Orient's mast that fell on the deck of their ship. However, in 1801, this ship was captured by the squadron of the French admiral Honoré Joseph Antoine Gantome.


French ships l'Invincible and Le Dix-Août attack Swiftsure on 24 June 1801

And the British squadron included the former French ships Tonnant and Spartiate, captured during the Battle of Abukir.

The Allied ships carried 2864 artillery pieces, and the number of crews reached 20 thousand people. The British ships carried 2312 guns and about 16 sailors.

In the Battle of Abukir, the French fleet suffered heavy losses, including casualties. As a result, British sailors were more experienced and better trained. The difference in the level of the gunners was especially critical: some argue that the British were almost three times faster than their opponents in terms of rate of fire.

Nelson then made a very controversial and fatal decision - to wear a ceremonial uniform with orders. He was now an ideal target, and Victory officers asked him to dress less conspicuously. Nelson replied:

"I honestly deserve the awards and honestly die with them."


Nelson's Trafalgar uniform. Greenwich, National Maritime Museum

Before the battle began, he told his captains:

“If you don’t see signals in battle or don’t understand them, place your ship next to the enemy’s - you can’t go wrong.”


Nelson outlines the plan for the Battle of Trafalgar to his captains, still from the 1911 American film.

At about 12 noon, Nelson ordered a signal to be raised, which researchers are still arguing about. Some write that it read:

"Nelson believes that everyone will do their duty."

However, such a signal is simply impossible - the code used does not have the necessary notations. The most popular version says that the signal was as follows:

"England expects everyone to do their duty."

This phrase became the battle motto of the British Navy.

But skeptics argue that Nelson gave the usual signal - required by the charter:

"Follow me."

The French ships raised the republican tricolor flags, the Spaniards raised the flags of their country and wooden crosses.

Battle



Joseph Mallord William Turner. The Battle of Trafalgar

So Nelson decided to attack the enemy fleet in two columns. The first to approach the Franco-Spanish fleet were 15 ships of Collingwood's column, which were tasked with cutting the enemy formation between 12 and 13 rearguard ships. However, in the end, the Franco-Spanish fleet was cut down to 16-17 ships, and Collingwood's ships were in the minority. The English ships also entered into battle not simultaneously, but in turn. Thus, their opponents had a good chance of success, however, as we remember, the English gunners fired three times faster. Nelson led a second column of 12 ships that attacked the center of the enemy formation.

It should be noted that the vanguard (former rearguard) ships of the French Vice Admiral Pierre Dumanoir, which had become separated from the main group of ships, continued to sail towards Cadiz. There were 9 of them, and they were joined by one ship of the central group. These ships began to turn back only at about 3 o'clock in the afternoon - too late, by this time the enemy had already captured 12 French ships. And 4 of them completely avoided the fight.

The first salvo of the Battle of Trafalgar was fired by the Spanish 112-gun ship Santa Ana, firing at Collingwood's flagship Royal Sovereign, which had rushed forward.


Santa Ana in an early 23th century engraving. This ship was captured by the British, but on October XNUMX was recaptured by Federico Gravina, returned to Cadiz, and then, together with the Príncipe de Asturias, was transferred to Cuba


Royal Sovereign in an engraving from 1796

At about half-past twelve, Collingwood's ship cut through the enemy formation and for about 15 minutes fought alone and was badly damaged. But the Royal Sovereign’s guns were not silent: the Spanish battleship Santa Anna and the French Fugue took a heavy toll. Then other English ships began to approach. Nelson's column entered the battle half an hour later.


Nelson and his officers on the deck of the Victory approaching enemy ships, still from the American film 1911.

The flagships of Nelson and Villeneuve, Victory and Bucentaur, met in battle. The French fired three salvos, knocking down one of the Victory's masts, but then either six or seven British ships hit the Bucentaur. Nelson's flagship passed the Bucentaur and found itself in front of the battleship Redoutable. Bucentaur was now tackled by the 98-gun English ship Temerair.


The French battleship Redoutable (center) and the British Victory and Timirer in Clarkson's painting by Frederick Stanfield

During the Battle of Trafalgar at sea, there was a strong rolling motion, which, on the one hand, interfered with aimed fire, and on the other, disrupted the formation of the Franco-Spanish fleet, which found itself “cut up” in several places. The battle turned into a series of confrontations between individual ships, which fired at each other almost point-blank - not only from cannons, but also from handguns weapons. Such fights ended in boarding battles. It was then that the gunner of the French ship Redoutable, who was on the mizzen mast, mortally wounded Nelson, who was clearly visible thanks to his ceremonial uniform, from a distance of 14-15 meters. The bullet passed through the shoulder, pierced the lung and got stuck in the spine, the admiral was paralyzed in the lower part of his body.


Nelson's wound in the painting by D. Digton

Nelson was conscious and demanded reports on the progress of the battle. At 4 o'clock in the afternoon, the captain of Victory informed him that 15 enemy ships had already been captured (including the French flagship, which had lost all its masts) and the battle had been won. Nelson is said to have responded:

“That’s good, but I was counting on 20.”

He died 30 minutes later. According to the official version, the admiral's last words were:

“Thank God I was able to fulfill my duty.”


Benjamin West. Death of Admiral Nelson

It should be noted that the battleship Redoutable, from which Nelson’s fatal shot was fired, was captured by his flagship, Victory. During the desperate boarding battle, the French lost 80% of the crew. The huge four-deck battleship Santissima Trinidad was also captured, which was forced to fight with seven British ships. The beating of the Franco-Spanish fleet was stopped by a storm.

The Spanish admiral Federico Gravina showed himself excellently in this battle, and continued to lead the battle even after losing an arm. He managed to take some of the ships to Cadiz, where they took refuge from the storm. The next day, despite being wounded, Gravina again led the remaining combat-ready ships to sea. It was possible to recapture the battleship Santa Ana, whose crew had mutinied against the British on board, but Gravina's two other ships sank during the ongoing storm.


Federico Carlos Gravina i Napoli in a portrait by an unknown artist

The Spanish admiral was never able to recover from the consequences of the wounds he received during the Battle of Trafalgar. He died on March 9, 1806, aged only 49.

After the battle


The results of the battle were as follows. The British did not lose a single ship; 458 of their crews were killed and 1208 were wounded. The combined Franco-Spanish fleet lost 22 ships (one was sunk, the rest were captured). The crews of the ships suffered heavy losses: 4395 people were killed, 2540 were wounded, about eight thousand were captured (including de Villeneuve). Up to three thousand French and Spanish sailors who had already surrendered drowned during a fierce storm on October 22, at the same time three ships that were captured by the British, including the Santissima Trinidad, sank. And on November 4, 1805, the squadron of Captain Richard Strachan intercepted 4 French ships of Rear Admiral Pierre Dumanoir, which left Trafalgar without taking part in the battle. These ships were captured and brought to England.

Nelson's body was brought to London in a barrel of brandy. They said that sailors drank this drink on the way - with the help of straws. It is difficult to say how reliable these stories are, but the rum that was given to English sailors actually began to be called “admiral's blood" or even "Nelson's blood».

Horatio Nelson's dream of a funeral in Westminster Abbey never came true: St. Paul's Cathedral became his burial place. And he was buried in a coffin made from a fragment of the mast of the French flagship, which the sailors of the battleship Swiftsure gave him after the Battle of Aboukir.


Nelson's headstone, St Paul's Cathedral, London

The captured commander of the combined Franco-Spanish fleet, Vice Admiral Villeneuve, was also present at this funeral. After a year and a half, he was released on his word of honor not to fight the British. On April 22, 1806, his body was found in one of the rooms of the inn where he stayed, awaiting Napoleon's orders. According to the official version, de Villeneuve, who feared the tribunal, committed suicide.


Pierre-Charles Villeneuve

In London, a square that was previously named after William IV was named in honor of the Trafalgar victory. It is located where the Strand, Whitehall and Mall streets meet. In 1842, in its center, on a granite column 46 meters high, a statue of Nelson, three times the height of a man, was installed. Alexander Herzen, by the way, called this column “a bad monument to a bad man».

The pedestal of the column is decorated with bronze panels depicting four of Nelson's famous victories - they are cast from captured French artillery pieces. And the metal of English cannons was used to decorate the upper part of the column.


Trafalgar Square, London


Nelsons column in London

It is curious that the construction was carried out with financial assistance from Russia: the government of our country wanted to improve relations with England.

The last surviving flag from an English ship that took part in the Battle of Trafalgar “surfaced” at an auction held in London on October 21, 2009, the 204th anniversary of the battle. With an original asking price of £14, this historically valuable relic sold for £000. Agree, the price is not too high - compared to the prices of some modern “works of art”.

Of first article You may remember that a few hours before his death, Nelson explicitly stated in his will:

“The only favor I ask from my Sovereign and from my homeland is concern for the fate of Lady Hamilton and little Horatia.”

England thanked its hero, leaving the admiral's beloved woman and his daughter without a livelihood. Upon receiving the news of Nelson's death, Emma Hamilton went to bed with a fever for two weeks. Having come to her senses, she learned that Nelson's will had not been recognized, and very soon she found herself in debtor's prison. Upon release, she rented a room in the attic, soon found herself in debt again and was forced to hide from creditors in France. Here, out of grief and hopelessness, she began to “hung to the bottle” and soon became an alcoholic. She died in complete poverty on January 15, 1815. Her daughter Horatia returned to England, married a priest and had 10 children (seven sons and three daughters).


Horatia, daughter of Admiral Nelson and Lady Hamilton

Only at the end of her life did she manage to obtain from the English government a one-time subsidy of 1457 pounds sterling (Horace distributed this money among her sons) and a “pension” for her daughters - 100 pounds annually. She died at the age of 80. On the gravestone she is named not as her own daughter, but as Nelson's adopted daughter.
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    7 January 2024 07: 02
    What kind of sword does Nelson have on the monument? A broadsword is not a broadsword... recourse
    And the fatal shot from the mast is considered one of the best along with Hatchcock, Zaitsev...
    1. VLR
      +6
      7 January 2024 07: 58
      This is probably not a real blade, but a symbol of a sword: the sculptor was not thinking about the authenticity of the image, but about how the statue would look from the side, plus another point of support.
      1. +3
        7 January 2024 08: 16
        Apparently yes. The sword from Treptow Park would have been too heavy to lift in real life. hi
        1. +4
          7 January 2024 15: 50
          I was surprised by the “gratitude” of the English government: shish was given to Lady Hamilton and Admiral Nelson’s daughter, Horatia. Although the dying admiral asked for it.
      2. +3
        7 January 2024 14: 56
        This is probably not a real blade, but a symbol of a sword:

        The first photo shows a British midshipman's dagger from the late 1856th century, and the second photo shows its 610 version. The name “dirk” should not be misleading; its length is 169 mm. Nelson's height, by the way, is XNUMX cm.
        1. +3
          7 January 2024 16: 17
          Single-edged, with a fuller... The blade is from a dirk, the handle is from a dagger. Some kind of compilation. hi
  2. +1
    7 January 2024 08: 47
    So the French lost freedom of navigation and to seize and plunder colonies. They fought for the Atlantic for 60 years.

    To the flood: the fundamentalists who have arrived in large numbers - Islamists and shamans from Africa and other overseas countries, will burn the Louvre and other courtly institutions? And the aunt with a smile, her detolte zone will be openly destroyed?
  3. +10
    7 January 2024 10: 09
    What do you think are the reasons for Nelson's fatalism? Put on a ceremonial uniform with orders, wrote a will? As a doctor, I can guess. He was missing an arm and experienced humiliating limitations in self-care. As written in the first article, I have been sick since childhood. Age has not improved my health. I stuck to my character, but I understood that in another year or two my body would completely crumble and become completely disabled. And he decided not to let it come to this, he thought that if he died a hero, the government would take care of his loved ones; they would not need anything. Overestimated London bureaucrats.
    1. +7
      7 January 2024 12: 21
      Quote: vet
      What do you think are the reasons for Nelson's fatalism? Wearing a ceremonial uniform with orders

      The fact that Nelson had an obscure appearance request
      I'm not kidding. I had a chance to read his biography. For Sir Horatio, wearing a ceremonial uniform with all the regalia was the norm. He even sat at the dinner table with friends like this. So as not to get lost against the backdrop of brutal sailors.
      However, the only time he dressed in a private dress in public was the trial of one of his former subordinates. He asked the admiral to testify to his previous impeccable service. Sir Horatio could have refused, but he did not. But he showed up to testify in civilian law.
      1. +1
        8 January 2024 14: 25
        Yes, "complexes" too. But imagine. Since childhood, he has been a sickly, proud man who, due to his injury, excuse me, finds it difficult to even go to the toilet on his own, especially on a ship. With age, everything worsens, new sores appear. And thoughts - what's next? Disabled carriage? A burden to both yourself and the woman you love? Could be looking for death. In battle, it is still not necessary to wear a ceremonial uniform with orders, and, as I understand it, everyone tried to persuade him not to wear this uniform. And before, there was no indication that Nelson always put on the dress uniform before the battle. Otherwise, all of his behavior at Trafalgar would not have been noted. Otherwise, why be surprised? He always puts it on and is wearing it now.
        1. 0
          8 January 2024 16: 03
          Disabled carriage?

          Due to the missing hand and eye? belay
          Quote: vet
          A burden to both yourself and the woman you love?

          Exactly the opposite. Nelson understood perfectly well that if he died, Emma and Horatia would be left with nothing. And I was not mistaken...
          He would have remained alive, received a warm place on the shore (like the uncle who patronized him), or in parliament. Somehow he provided for his daughter.
          Quote: vet
          And before, there was no indication that Nelson always put on the ceremonial uniform before the battle.

          And you the entire Have you studied Nelson's historiography?
          Then I don't argue.
          Quote: vet
          He always puts it on and is wearing it now.

          That's exactly what he did.
  4. Fat
    +8
    7 January 2024 10: 39
    Thank you, Valery. Very good article.
    Santissima Trinidad is an amazing ship. Built at the Royal Dockyard in Havana entirely from mahogany (mahogany) The figurehead of this "manovar"
    1. +4
      7 January 2024 13: 56
      Good afternoon, Andrey Borisovich! Merry Christmas to you!

      I agree with you that Valery’s article was a success (many thanks to him). I also want to share one fact: in honor of the victory at Trafalgar, the British built the destroyer HMS Trafalgar D1943 in 77.
  5. +9
    7 January 2024 11: 00
    The plan was very bold, even risky, since the British ships approached the enemy at a heading angle of almost 90 degrees and therefore could not use their artillery.

    One feels that the author is not a sailor. A heading angle of 90 degrees means that the enemy is abeam, that is, in a direction perpendicular to the centerline plane of the ship and can be fired upon with the entire side. In this case, the heading angle was close to zero.
    During the Battle of Trafalgar, strong rolling motion was observed at sea

    There is no rolling near the sea, there is a wave near the sea, under the influence of which the ship experiences rolling, pitching or rolling, depending on its position relative to the waves and wind.
    1. +9
      7 January 2024 14: 27
      Quote: Dekabrist
      One feels that the author is not a sailor.

      Yes, the author inserted the word “coursework” out of place. Apparently I wanted to add a marine flavor to the article. However, overall it turned out well, quite a decent review article.

      The most interesting thing in the descriptions of Trafalgar is when did Nelson actually manage to draw up his famous “battle plan”? The French behaved unpredictably, and it is difficult to convey anything other than a few words using flag signals.
  6. +5
    7 January 2024 17: 02
    I'll have to re-read "Cape Trafalgar" by Perez-Reverte...
    1. +3
      7 January 2024 17: 50
      Quote: Macsen_Wledig
      I'll have to re-read "Cape Trafalgar" by Perez-Reverte...

      Thanks for the tip, I didn't read it!
      Valery is better at writing about people. Simple, accessible and understandable. One drawback is that it is subject to subjective bias, which leads to excesses in conclusions.
      But if I choose from our moremanoa, I will choose Ryzhev, not Mokhov!
  7. +6
    7 January 2024 18: 21
    The Battle of Trafalgar is traditionally included among the four largest naval battles in world history - along with Salamis, Lepanto and Tsushima.

    It is unclear why this number did not include the Battle of Jutland (1916)
    1. VLR
      +4
      7 January 2024 19: 36
      Probably because it (the Battle of Jutland) actually ended in vain and did not in any way affect the situation on the fronts of World War I. Disappointment on both sides began to express opinions that large warships were very expensive to build and maintain, and that they were of little use.
      1. 0
        7 January 2024 21: 33
        Quote: VlR
        opinions began to be expressed that large warships were very expensive to build and maintain, and they were of little use.
        I'm not here to try to debate))
        but these opinions were clearly very weak, since after this battle the battleships were built for another 30 years, and their displacement more than doubled
    2. +2
      9 January 2024 09: 51
      Quote: Yeti Suvorov
      It is unclear why this number did not include the Battle of Jutland

      Due to the lack of an undisputed winner.
      Both at Trafalgar and in three other battles, one of the opponents was completely defeated.
  8. +8
    7 January 2024 18: 46
    To be fair, Napoleon had the opportunity to crush England despite Trafalgar. If only he had focused specifically on this goal. The resources of Europe at that time were many times greater than those of England, and if you couldn’t win with skill, you could win with numbers. But Napoleon was allowed to rule for only 15 years (!), and Russia played a significant role in saving England (at its own expense).
    1. 0
      12 January 2024 15: 05
      and Russia played a significant role in saving England (at its own expense). That's it. But the pro-English party was too strong, not wanting to lose its profits from trade with England. Just like modern oligarchs.
  9. +5
    7 January 2024 19: 05
    The naval defeat at Trafalgar began the dismantling of the Spanish Empire and culminated in another naval defeat in the 1898 Cuban and Philippine War against the United States. These two naval defeats led the Anglo-Saxons to unchallenged dominance in the oceans.
  10. +1
    7 January 2024 22: 15
    The article does not indicate the difference in the artillery systems of the British and French navies during the Battle of Trafalgard. The British equipped their ships with coronades, with short barrels and less long-range, but at close range capable of throwing more metal at the enemy. In many ways, it was the coronades that allowed the British fleet to demonstrate a high rate of fire. Napoleon was offered to switch first to the tactics of raider operations and during these operations to avoid combat with the British at close range. Fulton suggested that Napoleon convert his fleet to steam power before invading the British Isles.
    1. Fat
      +2
      7 January 2024 23: 54
      Greetings, Vladimir.
      Quote: gsev
      The British equipped their ships with coronades, with short barrels and less long-range, but at close range capable of throwing more metal at the enemy. In many ways, it was the coronades that allowed the British fleet to demonstrate a high rate of fire.

      Two caronades stood on the quarterdeck of HMS Victory, with a total number of guns of 104. On other ships, I believe, the situation is the same. No increase in rate of fire in the general mass. In the entire history of the Royal Navy, only one "manovar" was fully equipped with caronades, and this was much later...
      1. +2
        9 January 2024 09: 57
        Quote: Thick
        Two caronades stood on the quarterdeck of HMS Victory for a total of 104 guns.

        There's a different trick there. Large-caliber carronades installed on the upper deck of the British made it possible to mow down the French boarders with grapeshot, since the English ships were on average higher. So a couple of guns could have played their role at the decisive moment.
        This trick did not work with the Spaniards. Their ships were even higher
        1. Fat
          +2
          12 January 2024 05: 00
          hi Ivan. In any case, the “lemons” were better trained and in better physical condition, the teams were fully equipped, which is why they shot faster than the French, especially the Spaniards.
          1. 0
            12 January 2024 15: 12
            Quote: Thick
            hi Ivan. In any case, the “lemons” were better trained and in better physical condition, the teams were fully equipped, which is why they shot faster than the French, especially the Spaniards.

            And the French admiral was so-so. Indecisive. Villeneuve wiggled too much.
  11. 0
    26 February 2024 19: 05
    the battle is traditionally included among the four largest naval battles in world history - along with Salamis, Lepanto and Tsushima
    Why isn’t Jutlandic listed? Or Sinopskoe