January promises to be hot: prospects for a forceful solution to the Taiwan issue

61
January promises to be hot: prospects for a forceful solution to the Taiwan issue
Xi'an H-6 - the main irritant of Taiwan's air defense


Kuomintang against


Mid-January 2024 could not be more suitable for the start of the Chinese special operation to return Taiwan to its native harbor.



Why at this particular time?

On January 13, elections for the President and Parliament of the Republic of China (Taiwan's second name) are scheduled. Two parties are fighting for power in the archipelago - the conservative Kuomintang and the pro-American Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). The latter is now listed as the ruling party - Tsai Ing-wen, the chairman of the DPP, has already been president of Taiwan for two terms.

This is largely why relations between Beijing and Taipei are so tense - the ruling forces are doing their best to distance themselves from China, preferring the American umbrella. The Kuomintang cannot be called a completely pro-Chinese party, but at least they do not challenge the “one China” principle.

It was Tsai Ing-wen who welcomed Speaker of the US House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi to Taiwan with open arms last August. Under Kuomintang rule this would have been unthinkable. Ingwen's repeated and provocative statements regarding China have noticeably cooled relations between Beijing and Taipei.

Ordinary residents of Taiwan understand this very well - last August the ruling party lost the local government elections. It turned out to be especially painful for the DPP in special municipalities, where ¾ of the island’s population lives. According to the voting results, people from the Kuomintang received four seats, and the “democrats” only two.

In the upcoming elections, there is every chance for the Kuomintang to win, which cannot but worry the United States. If a president from an opposition party comes to power, events may not go according to the American scenario.

On the one hand, the president of Taiwan, who sympathizes with China, will sharply reduce the degree of tension with Beijing. And this is good for the US presidential administration - there will be one less hot spot on the planet. It could be sold to voters in the fall of 2024. But this is the only bonus for Americans.

The new broom in Taipei will sooner or later begin to negotiate the most profitable scenarios for unification with the PRC. That is, to resolve the inevitable issue politically. It is unknown whether it will work out or not, but the Americans will definitely reduce their support for Taiwan in this situation. Which will naturally make it easier for China to bring the rebellious island back under its umbrella.

By the way, there are already delays in the supply of military equipment - at the moment the Americans have not sent weapons by 20 billion dollars. The delay in deliveries is explained by the Ukrainian case, and now the Israeli war has also been added.


Kuomintang Party Flag "Blue Sky and White Sun"

Based on all of the above, the pressing question becomes not when China will begin its special operation, but how ready the United States will be to interfere in the internal affairs of Beijing and Taipei. Simply put, any hint of a color revolution in January-February 2024 will greatly increase the chances of a forceful reunification.

The first signs of the work of American political strategists are already present. Under the leadership of overseas comrades, the DPP carried out a rotation of personnel, corrected mistakes, and the rating naturally increased. In addition, the Kuomintang presidential contender, Hou Yu, was unable to find a common language with another oppositionist, Ko Wen-je, and now he is also running for election.

This split the ranks of opponents of the current pro-American government and at the same time increased the chances of the election of US candidate William Lai.

Task with an asterisk


The words “I want to emphasize that Taiwan independence means war” belong to Chen Binhu, a representative of the Office of Taiwan Affairs under the State Council of the People's Republic of China. Not the most significant figure in China, but this is just a test of public opinion. In the future, the right people of higher rank will say the same thing.

China has entered the Taiwan election race and does not expect to lose. So the deputy chairman of the Central Military Council, Zhang Yuxia, claims that “the army will not show any mercy to those who try to break Taiwan from the PRC.”

The phrases are loud, but backed up by very real deeds. First of all, China’s activity in the so-called Taiwan air defense identification zone. This zone is quite large and extends far into mainland China. When people talk about PLA warplanes appearing on Taiwan's radar, it is worth remembering that they may simply be flying along their coast. But in Taiwan this makes it scary.

The median line of the air defense identification zone, which runs through the Taiwan Strait, looks much more interesting. Before 2020, the Chinese rarely crossed it, simply because they did not want unnecessary confrontation. But already in 2021, the Chinese Air Force entered the east of the median strip almost a thousand times, and in 2022 there were already 1 crossings.

Taipei's biggest scare came on December 26, when 71 Chinese Air Force aircraft were spotted in the air defense identification zone, of which 43 crossed the median line. There is nothing fatal in such actions, but Taiwan has to respond - at least nine percent of the defense budget is spent annually on responding to such actions by China.


Illustration of Taiwan's air defense identification zone and its median line.

The constant increase in the PLA's combat activity around Taiwan may well be a stage of preparation for a major war. When warships and strategic missile carriers constantly fly near the borders, it is not difficult for the enemy to launch an offensive.

Firstly, Taiwan's defense is under constant stress - they are well aware that heavy Xian H-6s, for example, can carry hypersonic missiles. Fighters have to be scrambled to intercept, and this is a natural and accelerated wear and tear on the equipment. This is not the only example - the Chinese military is definitely trying to starve the Taiwanese out, or at least force them to spend more on defense.

Secondly, the military bustle around the island allows you to calmly prepare an offensive. Just yesterday, planes were simply strolling along the median line, and tomorrow they are destroying control points and air defense systems.

At the same time, all players understand the inevitable victory of China in a possible war with Taiwan. Inclusion of the army and fleet If it happens to the USA, it will lead to a third world war, which the Americans do not want at all.

Taiwan is both a very difficult target and a fairly simple one. It will not be possible to return the island with lightning speed - a landing operation through the strait will require a lot of effort and time. And, of course, there are many victims. But it will not be difficult for Beijing to blockade Taiwan, and Taipei will have no chance in a war of attrition.

Even the limited involvement of the American fleet (without the use of nuclear weapons) will not turn the tide of the conflict, but will only prolong it. They will try to crush it with sanctions, but China is a completely self-sufficient player on the world stage, capable of feeding itself even in complete isolation. Which, by the way, can only be organized from the sea - land borders outside the influence of the NATO bloc and its sympathizers. Russia will provide hydrocarbons and, in part, food products, and Beijing will handle everything else on its own. China alone has accumulated strategic reserves for at least six months.

The coming January should be decisive, first of all, for Washington's policy. China's interests in Taiwan must be taken into account, otherwise a military scenario of reunification is inevitable. However, one cannot rely on the prudence of the Americans - story with Ukraine once again confirms this thesis.
61 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    6 December 2023 04: 28
    And here, by the way, is the example of Venezuela in a dispute with Guyana over territory that has been going on since the 19th century. Once the 24th state of Venezuela was formed! Through a referendum, just like Russia decided with Crimea!
    1. -3
      6 December 2023 06: 43
      There is no point in being particularly happy about the upcoming batch. Russia will inevitably be involved in it, being absolutely unprepared for a large-scale confrontation. Of course, the main events will unfold in Southeast Asia, but our Far East, especially the island part, can become a battlefield. And we have a lot of problems with our European neighbors. It is necessary to prepare for a big war with decisive goals.
      1. +1
        6 December 2023 10: 30
        Why did it happen? Of course, Russia will express every support and approval, but that’s where it all ends. It is possible that supplies of energy, raw materials and food will increase.
      2. 0
        7 December 2023 16: 09
        Quote: Victor Leningradets
        Of course, the main events will unfold in Southeast Asia, but our Far East, especially the island part, can become a battlefield.

        The Americans don’t have enough problems with China and will they decide that they also need to engage the Russians with their nuclear potential? Or is it better to connect directly to the conflict
        1. 0
          10 December 2023 01: 44
          Quote: APASUS
          The Americans don’t have enough problems with China and will they decide that they also need to engage the Russians with their nuclear potential?

          Aren't you already hooked?
          Since 2014, in my opinion, they have grabbed hold of the Russian Northern Black Sea region.
          And whose planes, satellites and drones are directing British unmanned boats at Russian ships and bases? Whose missiles, shells, etc. are flying at our troops and our cities?
          We have been in a war for a long time, only in a wrong war.
    2. +5
      6 December 2023 06: 54
      Quote: andrewkor
      And here, by the way, is the example of Venezuela in a dispute with Guyana over territory that has been going on since the 19th century. Once the 24th state of Venezuela was formed! Through a referendum, just like Russia decided with Crimea!

      There is a difference. In the Crimean referendum, it was the residents of Crimea who voted, and in the Venezuelan referendum, only the residents of Venezuela voted. The Guyanese living in the part claimed by Maduro were not asked, and by the way, the standard of living there is much higher than in Venezuela, and they don’t fucking need Venezuela. It’s as if they held a referendum in the Russian Federation on the inclusion of Crimea, but Crimea itself was not asked.
      By the way, the standard of living in Venezuela is evidenced by the fact that this year Venezuelans made up the majority among illegal immigrants, ahead of the Mexicans, who have been in the lead for centuries.
      1. 0
        6 December 2023 20: 41
        Quote: Nagan
        It’s as if they held a referendum in the Russian Federation on the inclusion of Crimea, but Crimea itself was not asked.

        If we are to invent analogies, then this is a referendum using electronic voting at the State Services on the inclusion of the island of Hokkaido into the Russian Federation.
    3. +4
      6 December 2023 11: 48
      Only there, for some reason, a referendum was held not among the population of the disputed territories, but among the population of a neighbor who dreams of seizing these territories.
      1. 0
        6 December 2023 20: 42
        Quote: Kmon
        among the population of a neighbor who dreams of capturing these territories.

        Simpler.

        Madura didn't do anything at all.
      2. 0
        10 December 2023 01: 48
        Quote: Kmon
        among the population of a neighbor who dreams of capturing these territories.

        If not captured, return to Native Harbor.
    4. 0
      6 December 2023 20: 39
      Quote: andrewkor
      Once again the 24th state of Venezuela was formed! Through a referendum, just like Russia decided with Crimea!

      I am forced to note that the Madura referendum is a new word in the history of referendums in comparison not only with Crimea, but even with the Zaporozhye region. On the other hand, if Madura does not limit himself to insane statements, then Venezuela’s chances of finally getting rid of him increase sharply.
  2. 0
    6 December 2023 05: 16
    But it will not be difficult for Beijing to blockade Taiwan

    Well, well, if the Navy of R. Korea, Japan and the USA do not intervene, then even then you will have to strain, and if they intervene, then the navel will be untied and “blocked”...
    They will try to crush it with sanctions, but China is a completely self-sufficient player on the world stage, capable of feeding itself even in complete isolation.

    Yes, within six months of total trade sanctions there will be a sharp collapse in industrial production (one of the most export-oriented, by the way), which will lead to mass unemployment, a social explosion and a completely predictable change of power... That is why there will be no military operations or blockades, since the US , if desired, can replace China (it is already doing this with all its might), but China has not yet found an alternative to the American and European markets...
    1. +1
      10 December 2023 02: 34
      Quote: Doccor18
      replace China (already doing this with all their might)

      Well, if he’s still “working hard”, and therefore will replace him, then what’s the point of pulling the cat by the genitals? If it is replaced, will China still lose its markets?
      I am for a good mix between the Yankees and the Chinians. We don’t still have to fight a war.
      But China, of course, will try to do without war and blockade - through the peaceful unification of China with the rebellious province. By the way, the majority there is in favor.
      1. +1
        10 December 2023 10: 13
        Quote: bayard
        Well, if he’s still “working hard”, and therefore will replace him, then what’s the point of pulling the cat by the genitals?

        It makes sense to buy time. China is not ready for a fight right now. Not ready
        neither economically (its own Central Asian bloc, mainland routes are just being formed, their infrastructure is being built, emphasis is being placed on improving the well-being of its own people in order to increase the share of the domestic market over exports, science, microelectronics and the military-industrial complex are developing by leaps and bounds),
        not in the military aspect: 1. The PLA Navy, if it happened now, would completely blow away a collision with the combined American-Japanese-Korean Fleet. China has few aircraft carriers and small submarines; they are significantly inferior in terms of performance characteristics to the American ones. In such conditions, a blockade of the island is impossible, 2. The Marine Corps does not have experience in such large-scale operations, it is small in number to resolve the Taiwan issue, and the training of ground units requires a lot of time and appropriate technical equipment, 3. The PLA Air Force is not as strong and numerous as they portray its some experts. She still has no combat experience. In addition, while it is extremely deficient in the field of engine construction, almost a third of the fleet still flies on Russian engines.
        All this makes the operation impossible now. The Chinese are soberly assessing the situation.
        Quote: bayard
        China will lose its markets anyway

        This will not happen now, in ten years, at best. These ten years, I think, will be enough for China to solve its main problems...
        Quote: bayard
        I am for a good mix between the Yankees and the Chinians

        But I am against it, because Russia will be drawn into this conflict in any case. But the Pacific Fleet and the Eastern Military District will definitely not be willing to engage in this kind of “mixtures”...
        Quote: bayard
        But China, of course, will try to do without war and blockade - through the peaceful unification of China with the rebellious province. By the way, the majority there is in favor.

        Peaceful unification is an ideal option for the PRC and Taiwan, but the worst nightmare for the United States, because the annexation of the island will put an end to a hypothetical naval blockade of the PRC, so the democrats will stick in the wheels until the last moment...
        1. +1
          11 December 2023 03: 24
          Quote: Doccor18
          They will put a spoke in our wheels until the last moment...

          They will poke and poke with triple zeal.
          Just imagine that in the upcoming elections in Taiwan, the results will be falsified in the most crude, open and unprincipled manner. smile Of course, in favor of pro-American parties and the candidate.
          And after the start of the inevitable riots on this issue, these riots will be suppressed in the most brutal manner, the leaders will be arrested and accused of creating a mess with money and in the interests of China. feel
          And what should China do in this case, for which leaving everything without consequences is a Loss of Face. And even from a rebellious own province!... In the Chinese tradition, this is the most humiliating and unforgivable insult.
          And the Taiwanese authorities will also impose sanctions on China for this... And for this reason, the United States will begin an unlimited pumping of weapons into the rebellious island. And they themselves will introduce sanctions - “for an attack on democracy.”
          And you'll have to do something about it.
          The United States also knows how to count the time when China will become too tough for them. At first, they believed that to prevent this they needed to start a war in... the early 2030s. Then this milestone was moved to 2027. And already last year and this year, the Pentagon claims that the war must begin... no later than 2025!
          And all because China has sharply accelerated the rearmament of the Army, the pace of construction of the Navy and... strategic nuclear forces. And here it is no longer China that chooses the timing and date of the start of the conflict. The USA will appoint her. And they know how to create the conditions for it.
          1. 0
            11 December 2023 07: 11
            Quote: bayard
            Just imagine that in the upcoming elections in Taiwan, in the most rude, open and unprincipled way

            For the first time...?
            Quote: bayard
            And you'll have to do something about it.

            The Chinese are too pragmatic to start unprepared, because all this could turn into a disaster for the state. They have lost touch with Pelosi and will continue to do so, the time has not yet come...
            1. +1
              11 December 2023 08: 03
              Quote: Doccor18
              The Chinese are too pragmatic to start unprepared, because all this could turn into a disaster for the state.

              The caution and pragmatism of the Chinese is the talk of the town, but the fact of the matter is that they will be constantly provoked and coerced, and they will constantly lose face. And this is harmful to reputation.
              And any statement and reaction (diplomatic or informational) will be presented as an act or preparation for aggression... and sanctions will be imposed. Or they will simply provoke a “conflict through negligence” at sea or in the air.
              The US task is to inflict military defeat or force China to abandon its intentions and ambitions.

              And I don’t really like it if the USA collapses, and China (with a huge border with us, overpopulated and in need of resources) finds itself alone with us. There was one interesting beauty in the confrontation with the United States - our countries are in different Hemispheres. Therefore, there were many indirect conflicts, but they could not develop into direct and immediate ones... “by chance.” In any case, it would not be a conflict on the border. . . Therefore, I am not at all opposed if the United States and China enter into a conflict of any nature and scale. . . or even simply into a state of active Cold War. This will weaken them (especially China) both economically and lead to an overextension of forces in the military race. This will force the United States to leave only NATO against us... and it certainly won’t take it out against us.
              Problems will make us problems from the South... will be stopped. And Kazakhstan, which dared to be on the wrong side of History... will be punished. Or even divided between five neighbors. But no one will allow him to do bestiality. And everything is going well for Russia in the Global South.
        2. +1
          11 December 2023 04: 00
          Quote: Doccor18
          Quote: bayard
          I am for a good mix between the Yankees and the Chinians

          But I am against it, because Russia will be drawn into this conflict in any case. But the Pacific Fleet and the Eastern Military District will definitely not be willing to engage in this kind of “mixtures”...

          Well, first of all, we don’t have to get involved in this mess. After all, China didn’t get involved in the war for us either. Our position will be Armed Neutrality. VERY Armed.
          And do not underestimate the capabilities of our Pacific Fleet so much. You look at its surface part and completely lose sight of the capabilities of our attack submarines. And not only SSBNs. First of all, the presence in Kamchatka of the SSGN divisions pr. 949, 949A and Yasen-M.
          This year, another Yasen-M and another Borey-A were commissioned for the Pacific Fleet.
          In the future, 2024, another Yasen-M and Borey-A will also be commissioned for the Pacific Fleet.
          And this applies to those submarines that are already there and which during this time will come out of modernization at Zvezda.
          The batch of "Varshavyanka" for the Pacific Fleet will be completed.
          A series of corvettes, Project 20385, will be completed at the Amur Shipyard.
          The second BOD Project 1155 will emerge from the modernization, having received during the modernization not two, but FOUR UKSK for 32 cells, 4 x 4 = 16 Kh-35 anti-ship missiles, "Packet-NK" and medium-range air defense systems (it is not yet clear "Shtil" or "Redoubt").
          In addition, next year the nuclear-powered missile cruiser Admiral Nakhimov will also be upgraded. Which, by the way, is ALSO planned for service in the Pacific Fleet. Yes
          And also in the future, 2024, two new frigates, Project 22350 (for the Black Sea Fleet) and Project 22350.1 (with 4 UKSK) for the Pacific Fleet, will be commissioned.
          But at the Amur Shipyard they are also building Karakurts for the Pacific Fleet.
          And the UDC that is being prepared for delivery in 2024 at Yantar is also for the Pacific Fleet. And although it is an amphibious ship, it is capable of carrying 4 helicopters - be it a Ka-52M or an anti-submarine one. Maybe they’ll attach some kind of air defense system to it... if it were “Pantsir-M”, I would be simply happy... but most likely it will be possible to install just a “Tora-M2” module.
          And now add up what is at the Pacific Fleet now, and what will appear there over the next two years...
          In my opinion, it is serious enough for Armed Neutrality.
          And yes, I completely forgot about the submarine division carrying the Poseidons in Kamchatka. Also a good deterrent.
          And in 2025, two more brand new frigates, Project 22350.1, will be delivered to the Pacific Fleet. And at the Amur Shipyard, construction of a series of 6 frigates of the same project will begin.
          It seems to me that we will succeed in Armed Neutrality in the Pacific Ocean.
          1. +1
            11 December 2023 07: 22
            Quote: bayard
            We don’t have to get involved in this mess at all.

            But here there is no certainty...
            What if the Japanese, as part of a coalition, quietly decide, so to speak, to carry out the Kuril operation, “for the purpose of a naval blockade of China” (as an option)? Need an answer? Definitely.
            Even if China completely blocks all sea communications, its rear will be supported by the Trans-Siberian Railway and pipelines. How long will they function under such circumstances? Remember about Nord Streams...
            It is very doubtful that in the main battle (if it does happen) Russia will be able to remain an observer...

            Quote: bayard
            And don’t underestimate the capabilities of our Pacific Fleet so much

            I evaluate them quite soberly and believe that we, like the Chinese, lack at least another ten years...
            1. +1
              11 December 2023 08: 38
              Quote: Doccor18
              I think that we, like the Chinese, need at least another ten years...

              For complete stability in a war at sea - yes. But today it is quite enough to stop any global threats or to eliminate such a threat in the person of Japan.
              Is anyone now stuttering about the nature of the “underwater earthquake” and the Fukushima tsunami?
              What if, after their adventure with the Kuril Islands, ANOTHER thing happens, but fatally of greater force? Or is it in vain that the Poseidon carriers in Kamchatka were formed into an entire division? And for the whole of Japan, a couple of pieces will be enough to no longer remember such a state - request Forces of Nature.
              Or God's Punishment.
              As a result, American bases in the region will disappear... in the most NATURAL way.
              And note that for such an Answer a mighty ocean Fleet is not at all necessary. . . But it is also possible with a series of “Daggers” in special equipment. But this will already be obvious violence against the Aggressor. I would still prefer God's Punishment. Like last time.
              I repeat - by 2025, our Pacific Fleet will already be a sufficiently formidable force to be a warning to any aggressor. But we should not interfere in the struggle between the United States and China. Take advantage of the moment to obtain the maximum possible profit - yes. Just like China is doing to us now. Provide diplomatic support, cover the rear and organize the supply of energy and other resources - yes. But to interfere in their fight for the “King of the Hill” is okay. We also have to act as Arbitrator and mediator based on the results of their disputes.
              And in general, we can get a chance for the 10 years of enhanced and accelerated development that we are missing only if these two decide in a fight which of them is cooler.
              At this time, we may well replace the United States in the Middle East as a supplier of weapons, a Nuclear Umbrella for friends and a supplier of high technologies. Nuclear energy, Aircraft manufacturing (yes, instead of Boeings and Airbuses), because there are enemies in the west. And our revived and still quite good Education System. Let their students study in our universities, learn the Russian Language, fall in love with Russia... we will still need these personnel in the Future - to build harmonious, equal and mutually beneficial relations.
              We have to do all this in the next 10 years.
          2. +1
            11 December 2023 07: 54
            Quote: bayard
            A series of corvettes, Project 20385, will be completed at the Amur Shipyard.
            The second BOD project 1155 will come out of modernization...

            Against two light aircraft carriers and four dozen modern destroyers/frigates of the Japanese Navy...
            Add to that one and a half dozen of the best non-nuclear submarines in the world, the strongest anti-submarine air force in Southeast Asia and two hundred pilots on good fighters who have enormous experience in flying over the surface of the sea... If you don’t consider the strategic nuclear forces, then there’s not much to brag about, the situation is not In our favor. And if you add three standard squadrons (Korean, European and American) to the enemy’s camp..?
            1. +1
              11 December 2023 09: 20
              Quote: Doccor18
              Against two light aircraft carriers and four dozen modern destroyers/frigates of the Japanese Navy...
              Add to that a dozen and a half of some of the best non-nuclear submarines in the world, the strongest anti-submarine air force in Southeast Asia and two hundred pilots on good fighters,

              And what from this ? Should we play with conventional toys with them? stop No need . We are adults.
              Remember the movie about Indiana Jones, when the Nazis were chasing him in Egypt and a huge blackamoor with a saber blocked his way... And so deftly twirled it. lol Remember what Indiana did? He simply shot the fool, uttering only one word - “no time”.
              So we have NO TIME.
              What are all these ships and planes worth if their bases and the entire nearby country are washed away by the waves of the sea to hell?
              In addition, all this surface abundance is enough for one, even an incomplete salvo, of our “Batons” (I’ll keep quiet about the “Yaseni-M”, these two with a full salvo are enough).
              NAPL? Yes, they are good submarines, but they are armed with torpedoes and Harpoons. And we have “Granites”, “Onyxes” and “Zircons”. And also “Daggers”, which have already been trained on ships. Already taught.
              Their 200 “good fighters” probably won’t be able to fly against a couple of Su-35S regiments and a Su-57 squadron. So there is no need to thicken it.
              In addition, of the surface forces, one Nakhimov, three frigates 22350.1 and a pair of modernized 1155 are also guaranteed to sink all their surface forces. There would be target designation. And for this purpose, a constellation of maritime reconnaissance and target designation satellites is being deployed.
              I’m telling you - by the end of 2025, even the surface group of our Pacific Fleet will already represent a completely formidable force. In addition to the Batons, there will be four more Yasenyas and a pair of modernized Shchuk-Bs. Six new Warsaws, not counting the old ones.
              But for a final solution to the Japanese Question, a pair of “Poseidons” or, even simpler, two bottom sea mines are enough. Special power.
              You can spend three or four “Mace” and it will all end as soon as it begins.
              And no one will judge.
              But they will definitely stop doubting us.
              1. +1
                11 December 2023 10: 14
                Quote: bayard
                What are all these ships and planes worth if their bases and the entire nearby country are washed away by the sea waves to hell?

                You see what’s the matter, but do you have the courage to “wash it off and glaze it”...
                After all, this is a game without winners. The USA without Japan will lose all of Southeast Asia completely and irrevocably...
                1. +1
                  11 December 2023 10: 33
                  Quote: Doccor18
                  You see what’s the matter, but do you have the courage to “wash it off and glaze it”...

                  Why then, with such strain of strength, expenditure of funds and scientific potential, was all this created and continues to be created??
                  Appetite comes with eating. Confidence and brutality are gained when Real Power appears.
                  And this power is Real.
                  And who would dare to present to the Forces of Nature and the Will of God for punishment... THE AGGRESSOR? belay
                  After all, we are initially considering the option that Japan attacks unprovoked and seizes Russian territory. angry And as you know, for Russia - God Himself.
                  Do you think the USA... They will charge him?? No.
                  They will quickly wipe themselves off and crawl away.

                  ... You see ... After all, their own Destiny will be revealed to them.
                  And Fate, as you know, means ONE thing - the Judgment of God.
                  Or is it in vain that we have the God of the Sea in our arsenal? bully
                  1. 0
                    11 December 2023 10: 55
                    Quote: bayard
                    Why then, with such strain of effort, expenditure of funds and scientific potential, was all this created and continues to be created??
                    Appetite comes with eating.

                    That’s how it is, but they’re not in a hurry to put it into practice. Even the democrats, who once had complete superiority in these weapons, did not dare to use them against the USSR. And now no country in the world has total superiority. Moreover, in terms of strategic nuclear forces, it seems that the United States, Russia and China have approximate parity. Yes, we can drown the Japanese archipelago, but what are we going to do with the Minutemen and Tridents?
                    1. +1
                      11 December 2023 13: 49
                      Quote: Doccor18
                      That’s how it is, but they’re not in a hurry to put it into practice.

                      But you need to hurry slowly. In order to start swinging a club, you must first grow a club. Otherwise, if you rush, you will make people laugh.
                      Quote: Doccor18
                      Even the democrats, who once had complete superiority in these weapons, did not dare to use them against the USSR.

                      Yes, they were not ready in 1945! The war with Japan just ended in September. And it was necessary to give the country a rest, to switch society’s brains from the USSR and Stalin - the greatest heroes and victors, our allies and brothers in arms, to ... “let’s burn the USSR with an atomic bomb.” belay So, it won’t take long for the people’s brains to be twisted... They (the People) can rebel.
                      And the United States did not have a supply of bombs at that time. They barely managed to produce uranium for two bombs and plutonium (from Germany, they did not produce it) for one. what
                      Here is one uranium bomb that was blown up in the desert. The other two - "Baby" (uranium) and "Fat Man" (plutonium) - over Japanese cities. And... that's it request The United States never had any more atomic bombs. And the material for new ones still needed to be developed. To expand the capacity of the radiochemical plant... And when they had the first few dozen of these bombs... the USSR had already detonated the same bomb.
                      Moreover, Stalin was not at all simple. He left a huge group of troops in Germany and central Europe, deployed an entire airborne army in Chukotka (to transfer it to Alaska and from there launch an offensive along the coast. But most importantly, he put ... England under attack from his bomber aircraft! And the number bomber aviation in Germany was so great that England was afraid to make a crooked utterance. And the tank armies of the USSR with the monstrous IS-3 simply put the Anglo-Americans in awe. In a matter of weeks, all of Europe would have been under the control of the USSR, ports for American transports would have been inaccessible, and England was wiped out by carpet bombing.
                      And the United States still had too few atomic bombs to achieve victory with their help. Nuclear weapons are effective only in cities. If used against troops deployed along the front... their effectiveness is relatively low. At best, you can destroy a battalion stronghold. . . And they continued to accumulate and diversify nuclear weapons. And then the USSR tests a thermonuclear bomb!
                      And again in search of the “magic sword” or “silver bullet”.
                      Only after the number of atomic bombs numbered in the hundreds did the real possibility of their use in the war with the USSR arise.
                      1. +1
                        11 December 2023 15: 18
                        Quote: bayard
                        Yes, they were not ready in 1945!

                        At 45 you’re not ready, but at 50? And in 1950 they had almost four hundred b/g. versus our five... And all this against the backdrop of a monstrous difference in the capabilities of strategic aviation...

                        Quote: bayard
                        Moreover, Stalin was not at all simple. He left a huge group of troops in Germany..

                        That's the point. Having serious forces, the democrats never decided to attack, because something always got in the way... So I’m talking about the same thing, of course you can strike, but what will the costs be...
                      2. 0
                        12 December 2023 09: 58
                        Quote: Doccor18
                        And in 1950 they had almost four hundred b/g. versus our five... And all this against the backdrop of a monstrous difference in the capabilities of strategic aviation...

                        Stalin contrasted this with our shock tank armies in Europe, against which atomic bombs were ineffective, and even by destroying our cities, the United States would have lost all of Europe and England. And with a guarantee. The landing of American troops in Europe becomes impossible. In addition, in the USA they did not know exactly how many atomic bombs we already had, but they knew for sure that we were riveting the B-29 under the symbol Tu-4 at the fastest pace. At the same time, we actively worked to destroy the British Empire, created Israel (precisely for these purposes)... and in this noble cause (destruction of the British Empire), the United States and I acted together and even in concert.
                        So it was England that wanted to destroy us, but the USA had somewhat different plans. The colonies of England were tastier and we explored them together.
                        Quote: Doccor18
                        Having serious forces, the democrats never decided to attack, because something always got in the way...

                        We hindered them with our active foreign policy (aggressive and extremely offensive) and the successes of our Economy and Defense Industry. The Caribbean Crisis alone was worth it! After which we removed the missiles from there, but left a 40-strong corps, with airfields (near Florida!), from which our combat and anti-submarine aircraft flew over the Caribbean Sea, inspected American AUGs leaving the base and conducted an active search for American SSBNs in their areas combat deployment. And then our MAPL grazed there, tracking down the American "Ohio" and "George Washington".
                        What was the trick with Egypt? When did the Suez Canal come under our control? When did our 5th operational squadron begin to work permanently in the Mediterranean?
                        What about help and assistance in the victory of Vietnam? And control of the Malacca Straits from a base in Cam Ranh?
                        What about our bases for submarines in West Africa?
                        Until the top of the Union rotted, we marched victoriously. We constantly expanded our area of ​​influence, but did so without burdening our new friends and allies. And with benefit for yourself. If it were not for treason and the deliberate collapse and collapse of the Land of Soviets. . .
                        If the current ones do not commit treason (and then they will be thrown out, and they have WHAT to lose), then having felt the taste of the game, they will have no choice but to restore the USSR\RI within its\its former borders.
                        I am for USSR-2.
                    2. +1
                      11 December 2023 14: 30
                      Quote: Doccor18
                      Moreover, in terms of strategic nuclear forces, it seems that the United States, Russia and China have approximate parity.

                      No, parity is only between us and the United States in strategic nuclear forces. China has an estimated 300 to 500 nuclear warheads on strategic carriers. By 2030, China plans to have 1000 nuclear warheads on strategic carriers. And only by the mid-30s to achieve parity with the USA and the Russian Federation. Now they are actively building silos in 2 position areas.
                      And by 2030, if by some miracle nothing irreparable happens, both the Russian Federation and the United States will most likely withdraw from the framework agreements and enter a new nuclear arms race. And it would be better for us not to yawn, but to do this in an explicit and secret manner now.
                      Quote: Doccor18
                      we can drown the Japanese archipelago, but what are we going to do with the Minutemen and Tridents?

                      Just imagine yourself in the shoes of the President and the Supreme Military Council of the United States. You have 400 ancient, rotten Minutemen, and new ICBMs will not replace them for another 8-10 years. At the same time, Trident-2 is an excellent missile, and the entire arsenal is technically sound. There's just a problem with their use. Firstly, the technical condition of the Ohio-class SSBN is not entirely ideal. They are old and some of them may simply not be able to go to sea.
                      Secondly, Ohio-class SSBNs are not capable of firing a salvo of more than 4 SLBMs at a time. After which you need to pause, level the submarine, check the hull for deformation and damage, and only after that fire a salvo of no more than 4 missiles. Little is said or written about this in the regular press, but experts have known this feature for a long time. "Ohio" turned out to be too weak a hull, which is why the new SSBN was required to place only 16 launch tubes. And we even thought about limiting ourselves to 12.
                      That is, a one-time salvo will not have the character of a massive one. And until the next salvo there will be a good hour, or even more. And it’s not a fact that all these SSBNs will be able to fire back at all the BCs... Either their SSBNs will fall apart and sink, or they will realize it in time and try to retreat to a safe place on the surface.
                      And if several bottom nuclear land mines are detonated in the area of ​​their combat deployment - detonated remotely after the first salvo... subsequent salvoes may not happen. Even if they do not die, they are unlikely to be able to carry out a safe launch.
                      These are the features.
                      Yes, I think you already know about them.
                      So in terms of quantity, quality and ability to use, we have a clear and multiple advantage. And the range of strategic nuclear forces is much wider.
                      And additional and most effective strategic nuclear forces are not subject to the restrictions of the New START Treaty.
                      The advantage must be taken.
                      1. +1
                        11 December 2023 15: 22
                        Quote: bayard
                        China has an estimated 300 to 500 nuclear warheads on strategic carriers

                        This is where it gets very interesting. I’ve been reading for almost twenty years that the PRC has two or three hundred b/g. How is that? Either the Chinese industry stopped a long time ago, or they have a b/g no less than ours...
                      2. +1
                        11 December 2023 22: 46
                        Quote: Doccor18
                        I’ve been reading for almost twenty years that the PRC has two or three hundred b/g. How is that? Either the Chinese industry stopped a long time ago, or they have a b/g no less than ours...

                        It’s simple - during Kisenger’s tenure, when he was engaged in his famous “shuttle policy,” a certain “Cooperation Agreement” was concluded between the USA, China and England. For 50 years. According to this agreement, China renounced its alliance with the USSR, left the CMEA, and opened its doors to transnational corporations, creating for them an exceptional tax and legal climate. And incl. (and China was already a nuclear power) pledged to freeze the number of its nuclear warheads with the number that was at the time of signing. But there were either 240 or 280 pieces.
                        In response, China received Western investment, the deployment of American, British, and then European companies and corporations, and the wide open markets of the USA, Europe and England. And its economy skyrocketed.
                        But until 2020 (the expiration date of the agreement), the numerical limitations of nuclear warheads in China were strictly observed. And they didn’t bother anyone in the USA or the West.
                        And then a new agreement was concluded... the terms of which were changed, England dropped out of it altogether, and China removed many humiliating restrictions. Incl. on the number of strategic nuclear forces.
                        And then the construction of new position areas began. They already had new ICBMs - heavy solid fuel analogs of the Soviet Molodets, but somewhat lighter (88 versus 108 tons) and they carried 6 heavy nuclear warheads versus 10 for the Molodets, and the entire complex for overcoming the US missile defense system. They got all this from the Dnepropetrovsk Yuzhnoye Design Bureau, whose secrets were traded by the Privat group. A flow of specialists was organized... It is for these missiles that two silo positioning areas are now being built, as well as railway and ground mobile transport hubs, which are hidden in tunnels under mountain ranges, have been created.
                        The deployment and production of such complex and specific equipment cannot go too quickly, therefore the named pace of achieving parity, established at the CPC Congress, will be carried out at precisely this pace.
                        According to both China and the United States, when the number of nuclear weapons on strategic carriers reaches 1000 units, the likely damage from its use in the United States will become categorically unacceptable. Later, these estimates were revised again. As a result, the red line for the start of “active containment of China” became first 2027, and then 2025.
                        So China has absolutely no time left.
            2. 0
              11 December 2023 09: 24
              Quote: Doccor18
              And if you add three standard squadrons (Korean, European and American) to the enemy’s camp..?

              EVERYONE will fall to the bottom.
              But then those who sent them will have to work in the territories as well.
              However... after the EXEMPTIVE punishment (final) of Japan, if there is anything left of those squadrons afloat, they will VERY quickly go home and until the end of their days they will pray that they will not see THIS again.
              Not a joke .
        3. +1
          11 December 2023 04: 22
          At the same time, the Northern Fleet will not be weakened by the withdrawal of the Peter the Great for repairs and modernization. For it will consist of not only 3 new frigates of Project 22350, but also two modernized Project 1155, the second being a reinforced version (4 UKSK, Package-NK, 4 x 4 X-35 and medium-range air defense systems). And so also undergone repairs (replacement of boilers, capital upgrade of the power plant) and partial modernization of the Sarych... And of course, the Admiral Kuznetsov, which returned from modernization almost new.
          And a couple of "Ladas" - already serial.
          "Admiral Isakov" will enter service next year and go to the Black Sea Fleet. But his service will most likely be assigned to the 5th Operational Mediterranean Squadron - until the end of the Northern Military District.
          So, if you consider that all the large landing ships that are now based on the Black Sea (and there are not 12 of them there, as it were) have been installed with Tor-M2 air defense missile system modules... by 2025, the state of the Navy will not look so bleak at all, as it seems to many today.
          And it seems to me that we have decided to take shipbuilding seriously.
          hi
          1. 0
            11 December 2023 08: 03
            Quote: bayard
            At the same time, the Northern Fleet will not weaken

            The Northern Fleet will have enough work if a mess breaks out... It will be necessary to restrain the NATO Navy, cover the NSR, ensure the passage of tankers with oil and LNG (otherwise the paragraph will be lost for export).
            Quote: bayard
            as part of the 5th Operational Mediterranean Squadron -

            We will have to forget about the Mediterranean Sea for a while, strengthening two strategic ocean Fleets. It is not advisable to scatter your forces.
            Quote: bayard
            And it seems to me that we have decided to take shipbuilding seriously.

            Without a doubt, they did. But it takes time, and 2025 is too optimistic...
            hi
            1. +1
              11 December 2023 09: 50
              Quote: Doccor18
              We will have to forget about the Mediterranean Sea for a while, strengthening two strategic ocean Fleets. It is not advisable to scatter your forces.

              The 5th Operational is not just a demonstration of the flag in the Mediterranean, it is control of sea communications, strait zones and FREEDOM OF NAVIGATION for tankers and gas carriers, as well as transport with grain, etc. It is also a threat to the southern flank of NATO and their fleets. And don't underestimate its capabilities. After all, there could be something much more serious underwater. It’s enough for “Ash” to wander there alone... and if it’s also paired with “Baton”... And everything is far from so simple. Especially if at least half of the warheads on their missiles are of a special design. And their stability and situational awareness will be provided by the surface ships of the 5th Operational Squadron. And also a couple ... Il-38 in the version of a reconnaissance target designator (thanks to a side-view radar) and a UAV. Naval reconnaissance and target designation satellites are a given.
              Quote: Doccor18
              it takes time, and 2025 is too optimistic...

              2025 is the year when the Nakhimov and Kuznetsov, which came out of modernization, gained primary combat readiness, gained, albeit relative, stability of the forces of the Pacific Fleet, the Black Sea Fleet received the first modern surface ship (which will serve until the end of the Northern Military District in the Mediterranean Sea), already what There is a reasonable number of "Ash" in service and new diesel-electric submarines. That is, by the end of 2025, our Navy will no longer be ashamed. And he will represent a real force. Albeit with limited operational capabilities of surface forces. But we will definitely be able to reliably protect our waters.
              And also, probably for the entire winter period, “Admiral Kuznetsov” will be transferred to the 5th Operational Mediterranean Squadron for intensive training of Carrier Aviation pilots. And there will be a place for him.
  3. +3
    6 December 2023 05: 53
    China's words mean little. China needs Taiwan in the form in which it is now. China will not agree to merciless destruction. All economic plans will collapse. And China also does not want to stand on the same page as Israel. It would seem that there is no way out. But I think China will find this way out. Interesting engineering ideas help with this.
  4. +3
    6 December 2023 06: 22
    In the upcoming elections there is every chance for the Kuomintang to win
    Maybe we should wait for the elections in Taiwan and then make predictions?
  5. +3
    6 December 2023 06: 45
    Just one missile, even with a conventional warhead, flies into the “3 Gorges” dam, and China suffers more damage than it can gain even with the instant capture of Taiwan without bloodshed or shooting.
    1. +1
      6 December 2023 08: 34
      Revolver
      (Revolver system Nagant sample 1895 g.)

      The PRC can demonstrate its determination and flex its muscles as much as it wants, but it will not dare to seize Taiwan by force. Why I think so, the answer lies on the surface: China is highly dependent on world markets for its products; if the United States imposes sanctions against China, the consequences for the latter will be much more noticeable than from a missile hitting the 3 Gorges Dam. That is why China is relying on a non-forceful solution to the issue, through its supporters, especially since it has experience in Hong Kong.
      1. +4
        6 December 2023 13: 19
        if the US imposes sanctions against China, the consequences for the latter will be much more noticeable

        Have you tried to imagine the consequences of sanctions against China for the West itself? How will he get out without cheap Chinese goods? Especially when you consider that the world’s forge is precisely the People’s Republic of China?
        1. 0
          6 December 2023 15: 45
          paul3390
          (Paul)
          The world forge is slowly moving to India.
        2. -1
          6 December 2023 20: 48
          Quote: paul3390
          Have you tried to imagine the consequences of sanctions against China for the West itself? How will he get out without cheap Chinese goods?

          I really don't care. Two years of Covid have shown this perfectly. Unlike, for example, the Russian Federation, the USA and the EU have very powerful (despite all the efforts of Brussels and the German government) industry.
      2. -2
        6 December 2023 20: 45
        Quote: Gomunkul
        Why I think so, the answer lies on the surface:

        Of course:

        Because it will not be possible to carry out a strategic landing at the level of Overlord (more precisely, Sea Lion) in the position of the PRC. Even without the participation of potential allies of the Republic of Kazakhstan
    2. +3
      6 December 2023 08: 34
      Dear revolver of my grandfather in the First World War!
      The funny thing is that you are absolutely right, but everyone will absolutely not care what the warhead was. The answer will be reliable, so that all of St. Andreas will have enough.
      Well, you got excited about the conventional warhead. Knowing from my experience the construction of dams and the calculation of structures for seismicity, I guarantee you that even a Grand Slam with one hit will not cause fatal damage.
      And about who, who, with what and how is the tenth question. In the States they believe in the omnipotence of the courts, but in the world everything is different. So, as the Tall One sang: what does he care about - there are five hundred around him, and whoever survives whom will prove everything when they pin him down.
      In short, with your level of missile defense, the damage in a global nuclear confrontation is unacceptable for you. Taiwan is not worth it.
  6. +5
    6 December 2023 08: 50
    The new broom in Taipei will sooner or later begin to negotiate the most profitable scenarios for unification with the PRC. That is, to resolve the inevitable issue politically.

    There will be no voluntary unification with the PRC. The residents and leadership of Taiwan see very well what is happening in Hong Kong and how the communists have driven the locals away from power.
    But it will not be difficult for Beijing to blockade Taiwan, and Taipei will have no chance in a war of attrition.

    The PRC may try to block Taiwan, but then Taiwan will block the Taiwan Strait through which hundreds of ships pass. How long will the Chinese economy be able to withstand this?
    The inclusion of the US Army and Navy, if it happens, will lead to a third world war, which the Americans do not want at all.

    The Americans were not afraid to join the war in the 50s. Since that time, little has changed.
    1. +1
      6 December 2023 09: 57
      The Americans were not afraid to join the war in the 50s. Since that time, little has changed.

      Well, it's a classic:
      “I came here to dig for treasure, and no one - neither man nor devil - will stop me. I was not afraid of Flint when he was alive, and damn him I won’t be afraid of a dead one.”
      In reality, during the Korean War 1950 - 1953. The United States had a de facto nuclear monopoly, since the USSR did not have the ability to deliver nuclear warheads to the continent. And the US advantage in the number of nuclear warheads was overwhelming. And yet, they played a draw.
      In Vietnam there is a real defeat, despite actual air supremacy and technical advantage on the ground. And there were no problems with logistics (no one sank the transports).
      It's not like that anymore. And most importantly, the United States does not have the initiative.
      1. -2
        6 December 2023 11: 16
        Quote: Victor Leningradets
        The Americans were not afraid to join the war in the 50s. Since that time, little has changed.

        Well, it's a classic:
        “I came here to dig for treasure, and no one - neither man nor devil - will stop me. I was not afraid of Flint when he was alive, and damn him I won’t be afraid of a dead one.”
        In reality, during the Korean War 1950 - 1953. The United States had a de facto nuclear monopoly, since the USSR did not have the ability to deliver nuclear warheads to the continent. And the US advantage in the number of nuclear warheads was overwhelming. And yet, they played a draw.
        In Vietnam there is a real defeat, despite actual air supremacy and technical advantage on the ground. And there were no problems with logistics (no one sank the transports).
        It's not like that anymore. And most importantly, the United States does not have the initiative.

        The United States helped Taiwan fight off the communists before, and will help now. Nothing changed.
        1. 0
          6 December 2023 11: 24
          The United States helped Taiwan fight off the communists before, and will help now. Nothing changed.

          “Credere, cantare” - as Jacob and Maradona sang.
      2. -1
        6 December 2023 20: 51
        Quote: Victor Leningradets
        ended in a draw.

        Without an army.
        Quote: Victor Leningradets
        The USA had a de facto nuclear monopoly, since the USSR did not have the ability to deliver nuclear warheads to the continent

        You, as I understand it, believe that in the name of the freedom of North Korea, it was necessary to destroy several tens of millions of Russians and Chinese. But Truman and Eisenhower did not think so.

        It’s difficult for me to say who is right here, you or them.
  7. +4
    6 December 2023 09: 44
    There is no need for a fight between China and the United States over Taiwan, it won’t happen. Many people want it. But China doesn’t.
  8. +5
    6 December 2023 11: 34
    prospects for a forceful solution to the Taiwan issue

    With all due respect to the Author, the prospects for a forceful solution are approximately zero...
  9. +3
    6 December 2023 11: 48
    Since when is China a self-sufficient player? It depends on food supplies from outside. And Russia will not be able to quickly replace these supplies - the capacity of transport links with China does not allow it.

    Well, there is no need for the United States to directly attack Chinese ships and troops. They can simply organize a blockade and the Chinese economy, tied to maritime cargo transportation, will be finished. And China will have to choose: either the collapse of the economy, or the collapse of the economy + a full-scale naval and air war with the US bloc, or a retreat admitting defeat.
  10. +2
    6 December 2023 12: 35
    China's per capita nominal GDP is equal to Russia or even slightly lower. The population of Taiwan is 3 times richer than China, has the most powerful
    semiconductor industry.

    They say that China and Taiwan are very different in mentality, not because of communism - there is little left of it in modern China, but because of the Cultural Revolution.
    And also the traditional foreign policy of China: there is a Middle Empire and barbarians.
    It is somewhat naive to expect that the Kuomintang might decide to voluntarily enter China.
    1. +1
      6 December 2023 20: 56
      Quote: Ivan Seversky
      The population of Taiwan is 3 times richer than China, has the most powerful
      semiconductor industry.

      Yeah. The idea that the rich and free Republic of China will run as fast as it can to join the poor and bloodthirsty rebels, and even having the example of Hong Kong before it, is common to all armchair geopoliticians.
  11. 0
    6 December 2023 13: 05
    median line
    median (middle) line
    Kinmen and Mazu in the Taiwan Strait.
    Both island groups are located off the coast of mainland Fujian province but are controlled by Taiwan.
    https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Цзиньмыньдао
    https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Мацзу_(острова)
  12. +1
    6 December 2023 14: 11
    From a formal point of view, yes, the time for a forceful solution is as good as possible because there are global distractions and some fatigue in the West from supporting conflicts.
    However, the question of whether the PRC wants to resolve the issue by force is ambiguous.
    1. +1
      6 December 2023 15: 50
      But the fleet of the United States and its allies is not particularly distracted by anything. And it is unrealistic to hide preparations for an invasion - there will be more than enough time to react (in particular, to prepare a blockade and sanctions).
  13. 0
    6 December 2023 20: 30
    Mid-January 2024 could not be more suitable for the start of the Chinese special operation to return Taiwan to its native harbor.
    This is not an analysis, but another episode of a soap blockbuster about the Northern Military District of the People's Republic of China in Taiwan. It is not difficult to understand the simple message of such authors: they really want and dream of distracting the Americans with a fire in the territories that interest them. However, the problem remains that the Chinese leadership, having its cautious and pragmatic views, is not inclined to get involved in military-political adventures, expecting that “the fruit will ripen on its own.”
    The coming January should be decisive, first of all, for Washington's policy. China's interests in Taiwan must be taken into account, otherwise a military scenario of reunification is inevitable. However, one cannot rely on the prudence of the Americans - the story with Ukraine once again confirms this thesis.
    We'll wait and see, but it's not worth exaggerating the Americans' desire to start a war, for all their arrogance and self-confidence...
  14. 0
    7 December 2023 22: 45
    I don’t see why China would need this. They have economic problems and a rapidly aging population. In general, their policy has reached the limit of its development. To continue it will have to be reformed, but the CCP has just mothballed the situation, in the style of Leonid Ilyich.
    I don’t think they will dare to take an adventure
  15. 0
    8 December 2023 20: 43
    Quote: Doccor18
    since the United States, if desired, can replace China (it is already doing this with all its might),

    Since you know that the United States is “in full swing,” can you name who exactly? And we will all laugh.
  16. 0
    10 December 2023 12: 18
    This is lovely, but Baba Yaga in Washington is against it.
    Ceterum censeo Washingtonum delendam esse