Russian aristocrats against Emperor Paul I. “Conspiracy of the Beneficent”

89
Russian aristocrats against Emperor Paul I. “Conspiracy of the Beneficent”
Monument to Paul I in the courtyard of the Mikhailovsky Castle


As we remember from previous articleDuring the few years of his reign, Paul I managed to do a lot of good for the state and the vast majority of his subjects, but at the same time alienated a narrow layer of serf-owning nobles against himself. Particularly dissatisfied were the depraved officers of the guard regiments of St. Petersburg, who suddenly realized that their duties included not only playing cards, dancing at balls and carousing in taverns with gypsies. You must also regularly appear in the barracks and, oh horror, dress according to the regulations, learn to walk in formation and handle the service card. weapons. These quite reasonable demands were quite enough to declare the emperor crazy.



On the other hand, Paul I dared to allow himself an independent foreign policy and challenge the British, who insulted him by refusing to return Malta, which legally belonged to him. And the Russian aristocrats who wanted to lead a “European way of life” were entirely dependent on the British who bought grain from them. There are no foreign exchange earnings from Britain - there is no opportunity to spend money in European capitals, buy luxury goods, furnish mansions with imported furniture, pay salaries to French chefs, Italian musicians, German estate managers, take in foreign actresses, ballerinas and singers for maintenance. Thus, Russian nobles and English bankers and lords had common interests. We remember that the sister of Catherine II’s last favorite, Platon Zubov, Olga, better known by her husband’s surname (Zherebtsova), was the mistress of the English ambassador Charles Whitworth, who in every possible way promoted among Russian aristocrats the idea of ​​removing Emperor Paul I, who was inconvenient and objectionable to Britain, from power with the appointment of a regent. The Zherebtsova-Zubova brothers, who fell into short-term disgrace under Paul I, had already been returned to St. Petersburg, restored to their rights (including property rights) and, not needing anything, led a secular lifestyle. However, they dreamed of restoring their former influence at court, which they hoped to gain under the young and new Emperor Alexander I, who owed everything to them. Olga Zherebtsova-Zubova became a mediator between the British Ambassador Whitworth and the Russian conspirators.


Charles Earl Whitworth, engraving from the book "History Russian Empire", London, 1859.


Olga Zherebtsova in the portrait of Jean-Louis Voile

However, the conspirators received a heavy blow after a dispatch was intercepted in which Whitworth called Paul I crazy. This led to his expulsion from St. Petersburg, but the conspiracy had already taken shape and acquired “flesh and blood.” Proof of the English trace in the murder of Paul I is the 2 million rubles that Olga Zherebtsova received in London immediately after the assassination of the emperor. She was supposed to distribute this money among his killers, but she appropriated it, deciding that the conspirators would not dare to openly demand their “30 pieces of silver,” and, of course, none of them would file a complaint in court.

The first conspiracy against Paul I was drawn up back in 1796 in Smolensk; it is sometimes called the “Conspiracy of Amateurs.” The conspirators were led by two retired colonels - A. M. Kakhovsky and P. S. Dekhterev, who gave their organization the strange-sounding name “Canal Workshop”. "Canaglia" literally means "pack of dogs" in Italian. But later they began to call swindlers and swindlers that way. I think you will agree that it is difficult to expect anything serious from an organization with such a name. In 1798, all these “rascals” were arrested, no one was executed - they got off with prison or exile.

Much more dangerous was another conspiracy, organized with the help of the British by the highest dignitaries and aristocrats of the Russian Empire. The “conspiracy of the blessed” began to take shape in the summer of 1799, the denouement came on the night of March 11 (23) to March 12 (24), 1801.

Dramatis personae


In St. Petersburg, the idea of ​​​​abdicating Paul I from the throne was promoted by Nikita Petrovich Panin, the nephew of the mentor of this emperor (Nikita Ivanovich Panin). Under Paul I he became vice-chancellor at the age of 29.


Nikita Petrovich Panin in the portrait of Jean Louis Voile

But Panin was an ardent opponent of the alliance with France. On this basis, he later quarreled with Pavel and was sent to his estate Dugino. Ironically, N. Panin was the only one of the conspirators who really wanted to save the life of Paul I. Alexander, in his opinion, should have become “regent for a mad father».

Before his disgrace, Panin managed to attract Admiral Osip de Ribas to his side.


Osip de Ribas in a portrait of Lampi, 1796

The founder of Odessa, Paul I, was initially dismissed from his post as commander of the Black Sea rowing fleet, then returned to service - and again dismissed for numerous abuses in the quartermaster line. De Ribas was more than determined, demanding that a dagger or poison be used against Paul. And suddenly he was appointed acting minister of the sea, which obviously made him very happy. But the conspirators were frightened by this appointment - they now feared betrayal on the part of the admiral. And therefore there were rumors that the sudden death of de Ribas was caused by poisoning. They even named the name of the alleged poisoner - he was allegedly the Governor-General of St. Petersburg, Count Pyotr Alekseevich von der Palen, who joined the conspiracy. It was he who was at the bedside of the ill de Ribas on the night of his death.

Palen came from the family of one of the Courland barons. He fought with the Turks, including near Bendery (where he was wounded), and near Ochakov, and in 1791 he negotiated peace with the Swedes. Having been appointed ruler of the Riga viceroyalty and governor-general of Courland, he incurred the wrath of Paul I by providing a royal reception to the disgraced Platon Zubov, who was heading abroad (in fact, honors were due to the former king of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth Stanislav Poniatovsky, but he passed by Riga). However, soon Paul not only returned Palen to service, but also literally showered him with favors - he appointed him governor-general of St. Petersburg, inspector of six military colleges, director of posts, member of the board of foreign affairs and chancellor of the Order of Malta. However, he apparently remained resentful of the emperor.

Palen was 55 years old at this time, but he still retained vigor in both body and spirit, and had the appearance of “the most honest and the most fun“, knew how to please people.


P. A. Palen in the portrait of D. Walker (from the original by G. Kugelgen), 1790s.

Gradually, it was Palen who found himself at the head of the conspiracy. He took on the role of “recruiting” the heir to the throne, Grand Duke Alexander.


Tsarevich Alexander in a portrait by an unknown artist, 1798-1800.

At first, Alexander was offered to become his father’s co-ruler: supposedly the Senate would be able to convince Paul of the need for such a step, all that was needed was Alexander’s consent to this. The Grand Duke readily “swallowed the bait” and did not inform his father about this conversation. The arrival of Empress Maria Feodorovna's nephew (13-year-old Eugene of Württemberg) in St. Petersburg was used to spread rumors that Paul intended to marry him to his eldest daughter and declare him heir to the throne. They began to frighten Alexander with the wrath of his father, who was allegedly ready to send him, his brother Constantine and his mother-empress to prison.


Johann Baptist Lampi the Elder. Grand Dukes Alexander and Constantine. 1795

Palen recalled:

“I presented him (Alexander) with a choice - either the throne, or prison, and even death.”

And further:

“Alexander demanded from me a preliminary oath that they would not make an attempt on his father’s life. And I gave him my word... I knew perfectly well that it was necessary to complete the revolution or not start it at all, and that if Paul’s life was not terminated, then the doors of his prison would soon open.”

It seems that Alexander, who knew how the abdication of the throne ended for his grandfather, Peter III, perfectly understood the impossibility of a bloodless coup and “bargained” only for show. The following description by F. F. Rostopchin of relations in the family of Paul I has been preserved:

“Grand Duke Alexander hates his father; Grand Duke Constantine is afraid of him; The daughters, raised by their mother, look at him with disgust, and all this smiles at him and would like to see him turned to dust.”

In general, as Herzen later wrote,

“Alexander ordered to kill his father, but not to death.”

In parallel with the “processing” of the heir, new participants in the conspiracy were recruited - according to the same scheme: Palen confidentially informed the chosen person that a decision had already been made on his arrest or expulsion from the capital. It was difficult not to believe the Governor-General of St. Petersburg and the head of the Secret Police. Meanwhile, Pavel was persuaded to grant amnesty to many of his future murderers, including Bennigsen and the Zubov brothers.


Levin August Gottlieb Theophile von Bennigsen on an engraving by Geitman after the original by J. Doe. In Russia he was called Leonty Leontyevich. A native of Hanover, an English subject in Russian service. He never learned to speak Russian

Leonty Bennigsen and Platon Zubov will become leaders "squad of drunken guards", who on the night of the murder break into the emperor's bedroom. By the way, it was the British envoy Charles Whitworth who gave his mistress Olga Zubova-Zherebtsova money to bribe Kutaisov, who persuaded Paul I to return the Zubovs to St. Petersburg.

On the other hand, Arakcheev, who was unconditionally loyal to the emperor, was removed from St. Petersburg.

Two days before the murder, Pavel directly asked Palen if he knew about the conspiracy. Palen, as you know, claimed that he assured the emperor that he deliberately entered the circle of conspirators in order to be aware of their plans. But General Karl Toll recounted Palen’s story he heard:

“Once Paul asked him: “They say that there is a conspiracy against me and you are one of the conspirators.” Palen paused in his bow for a moment, returned his normal expression, and replied, “How can this happen when we have a Secret Expedition?”

Having calmed the emperor, Palen asked permission, in case of emergency, to arrest the empress and the grand dukes. He presented the received order to Alexander. In addition, Palen recommended that Paul nail down the door to the chambers of his empress wife, from where the conspirators allegedly could have broken into his bedroom. Thus, Paul was deprived of the opportunity to seek salvation in his wife’s rooms.


Fragment of the painting “Coronation of Paul I and Maria Feodorovna” by Martin Ferdinand Quadal

Anxious forebodings had long haunted the emperor, who decided to build for himself and his family not a palace, but a castle, named after the heavenly patron of the Romanov dynasty - Archangel Michael (also called the Engineer). Construction was completed at the end of 1800. Pavel managed to settle in the Mikhailovsky Castle. And he was killed 39 days after the move.


Mikhailovsky Castle

The last day of the life of Paul I


On March 11 (23), 1801, the emperor, as usual, woke up at about 4 o’clock in the morning. He worked in his office until 9 o’clock; among other things, he listened to Palen’s report. Then, together with his son Alexander, he “inspected the troops».


Alexander Benois. "Parade under Paul I"

Palen then gathered the guards officers and, on behalf of the emperor, expressed to them “the sovereign's particular displeasure with their service” and hinted at imminent disgrace, even arrest and exile. This was done so that they would not especially grieve for the murdered emperor.

At about one o'clock in the afternoon, Pavel dined at the Mikhailovsky Castle, and meanwhile Palen sent out invitations to dinner to the people involved in the conspiracy. Between 15 and 17 p.m., Pavel swore in all family members, after which he was in a good mood and invited his sons Alexander and Konstantin to have dinner with him. This last meal took place at 9 pm. Among others, Palen's wife and daughter, as well as General Mikhail Kutuzov, were present. Leaving the dining room, Pavel looked at himself in the mirror and said:

“Look how funny the mirror is; I see myself in it with my neck to the side.”

His next phrase is conveyed in different ways. Some recalled that the emperor quietly said:

“Going to death is not making knapsacks.”

Others stated that he said:

"Which have not be avoided."

At about half past ten, the life physician Grivet gave the emperor a lemon-mint tincture, after which the outer doors were closed. And before going to bed, Pavel spent about an hour in the company of his favorite Anna Gagarina. And at this time, the 3rd battalion of the Semenovsky regiment (whose commander was Tsarevich Alexander) was alerted and sent to the Mikhailovsky Castle, where it replaced the Preobrazhensky battalion - under the pretext that Paul I had scheduled a review of their regiment for early morning. The officer commanding the Preobrazhensky soldiers did not dare to disturb the emperor, who had already gone to his bedroom, to clarify the order and ordered his subordinates to surrender their posts.

Meanwhile, Platon Zubov and Leonty Bennigsen came to Palen’s house. Here they saw a large hall filled with a large number of drunken officers - from 40 to 60 people. In the end, only Palen and Bennigsen turned out to be sober. Platon Zubov announced that Tsarevich Alexander sanctioned the removal of Paul I from power - fulfilling the will of Catherine II, who allegedly wanted to transfer the throne to him, but the will was destroyed by Bezborodko. The question arose of what to do with the abdicated emperor, it was then that Palen said:

“I remind you, gentlemen, that in order to eat scrambled eggs, you must first break the eggs.”

However, seeing that not everyone present shared his point of view, he feignedly agreed to take Pavel to Shlisselburg.

The next article will talk about the murder of Paul I and the fate of the conspirators.
89 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    28 November 2023 05: 06
    Thank you Valery for sharing your view of the history of events! Still, it’s more or less clear with Paul I, unlike his father.
    However, it would be interesting to know the Author’s opinion on the “possible” role of Arkachev, who, according to many researchers, “did not have time” to prevent the conspiracy.
    Good day to everyone, health, success and prosperity! Fortunately, food (spiritual), unlike the day before, is already there!
    1. +3
      28 November 2023 06: 31
      Good morning Vlad! hi

      About Arakcheev. The figure is very interesting. The most important thing is that he simply served those whom he served. He served faithfully.
      PS Interesting fact: in 1814, Arakcheev was promoted to field marshal general, but he himself refused this rank.

      Have a nice day, everyone! hi
      1. +4
        28 November 2023 07: 07
        Good morning!
        As far as I remember, he refused titles and gifts more than once or twice. At a minimum, we owe him for the artillery of the 12th year.
        hi
        1. +3
          28 November 2023 07: 10
          Naturally!
          So he’s a general from the artillery.
          By the way, Arakcheev developed a project for the abolition of serfdom. But it didn’t work out, the emperor was dissatisfied with it (the project)...
        2. +2
          28 November 2023 07: 11
          Naturally!
          So he’s a general from the artillery.
          By the way, Arakcheev developed a project for the abolition of serfdom. But it didn’t work out, the emperor was dissatisfied with it (the project)...
        3. +4
          28 November 2023 08: 00
          Vladislav, good morning,
          At a minimum, we owe him for the artillery of the 12th year.

          This is another modern myth.
          We owe it to Napoleon and copied it from him.
          The transformation of artillery and the creation of an artillery school was entrusted by Alexander I under the influence of Napoleon - to Arakcheev. He completed the assignment, but with excessive cruelty.
          He himself had never been on the battlefield, as his contemporaries wrote about.
          Therefore, being not, he logically refused the field marshal.
          Arakcheev is a typical martinet, and also a cruel martinet. Why was it “used” by both Paul and Alexander - all three were obsessed with formalism: “the demon of the parade ground,” and not with real control, including on the battlefield: Not in the Tsaritsyn meadow, as Kutuzov told Alexander at Austerlitz.
          hi
          1. +10
            28 November 2023 08: 25
            No Edward, not a myth.
            Russian artillery in the 18th and early 19th centuries developed with an eye on France and England, but was quite original, and in some cases was ahead of the Europeans.
            Moreover, it was not Arakcheev alone who was at the origins, but a galaxy of specialists, engineers and organizers.
            R.s. If you don’t believe me, then google who was the first to have a full-fledged buffet, howitzer artillery with a conical chamber (unicorns) and horse artillery. We were inferior to the French in terms of technology, but the organization of our park was always better. hi
            1. VLR
              +8
              28 November 2023 08: 46
              Arakcheev liked to say:
              "We Russians need to demand the impossible from us in order to achieve the possible."

              Arakcheev was a very good artillery officer, under him the supply of artillery units with ammunition significantly improved. He personally compiled the “Manual for Battery Commanders,” which is rated quite highly by military historians and, by all accounts, contributed to improving the quality of training for artillery units. On the recommendation of Arakcheev, artillery was allocated as a separate branch of the military and organized into companies and brigades. To give these units greater mobility, the calibers of the guns and the size of the carriages were reduced. In addition, work on their standardization continued, thanks to which now army gunsmiths in the field could quickly assemble one combat-ready gun from two or three broken guns. The Artillery Committee appeared and the Artillery Journal began to be published. Arakcheev himself then wrote articles on the technology of manufacturing gunpowder and saltpeter, as well as performing live firing.
              The Artillery Commission was active at that time, which, in addition to its chairman A. Arakcheev, included I. G. Gogel, A. I. Kutaisov and H. L. Euler. A unified system of artillery pieces was developed, called the “Arakcheevskaya” (or “system of 1805”).
            2. +5
              28 November 2023 09: 49
              Vladislav,
              If you don’t believe me, then google who was the first to have a full-fledged buffet, I don’t google howitzer.

              I usually ask for a link to a scientific paper. laughing laughing
              Because when I write, this is data from specific scientific works. hi
              And there were guns on my buttonholes, although I was not a gunner hi
              Best regards,
              Edward hi
              1. +5
                28 November 2023 12: 30
                Quote: Edward Vashchenko
                Vladislav,
                If you don’t believe me, then google who was the first to have a full-fledged buffet, I don’t google howitzer.

                I usually ask for a link to a scientific paper. laughing laughing
                Because when I write, this is data from specific scientific works. hi
                And there were guns on my buttonholes, although I was not a gunner hi
                Best regards,
                Edward hi

                At least respected VikNik A. Nilus with “
                Back
                A. Nilus “HISTORY OF MATERIAL PART OF ARTILLERY.”
                There are modern monographs and works, but I am cut off from the sources, even my home library.
                Several photographs from the local history museum of Kamensk-Uralsky.


              2. +1
                28 November 2023 21: 13
                I usually ask for a link to a scientific paper.

                Edward, with all my wonderful attitude towards you, would also ask for a link to this statement of yours. Like a friend! drinks
                We owe it to Napoleon and copied it from him.

                But the Gatchina artillery was excellent. Although it was not Arakcheev who founded it, he commanded it. drinks
          2. VLR
            +8
            28 November 2023 09: 04
            Arakcheev is a typical martinet, and also a cruel martinet..."devil of the parade ground"

            It has long been noted that Arakcheev was not an ideologist, but a diligent and very effective executor of other people’s plans. The same Alexander I once said to Kleinmichel:
            “You cannot know what Arakcheev means to me; he takes all the bad upon himself and attributes all the good to me. "

            The same military settlements were the idea of ​​Alexander I. Arakcheev was on his knees, begging him “not to create new archers.” But then, having been appointed to the “execution” position of the chief commander of the Separate Corps of Military Settlements, he diligently fulfilled his duties. And he understood that he would be damned. Ermolov said:
            "Many undeserved curses will fall on me."
            But he strictly followed the emperor’s orders.
          3. +3
            28 November 2023 12: 05
            Quote: Eduard Vaschenko
            This is another modern myth.

            So how long does it matter whether he came up with it himself, or was smart enough to accept other people’s innovations?
            In any case - well done!
    2. VLR
      +5
      28 November 2023 08: 39
      In October 1799, Paul I dismissed Arakcheev: the reason for the emperor’s anger was Arakcheev’s attempt to free his brother Andrei from punishment. The fact is that while Andrei Andreevich Arakcheev’s subordinates were on duty at the Arsenal, someone cut off the gold embroidery from the ceremonial artillery chariot. Defending his brother, Alexey Andreevich stated that the theft had occurred earlier, but the slandered officer turned to another of Pavel’s nominees, Kutaisov. He gladly reported this to the emperor. Paul was offended that they were trying to deceive him. This, by the way, speaks of Pavel’s objectivity, because he always highly valued Arakcheev, who came from a poor noble family. who owed him everything and was unconditionally devoted.
      1. +4
        28 November 2023 11: 14
        Quote: VlR
        This, by the way, speaks of Pavel’s objectivity

        No. This speaks of his absurdity and habit of making rash decisions.
        1. +4
          28 November 2023 11: 17
          Well, here I didn’t please either - I didn’t treat “my” person condescendingly. And if he did, they would write that Paul 1 was hypocritical, he had double standards.
          1. +4
            28 November 2023 11: 35
            Quote: vet
            did not treat “his” person condescendingly.

            With the corresponding result. request
            Quote: vet
            And if he did, they would write that Paul 1 was hypocritical, he had double standards.

            They don’t say that about Peter I. Although Alexander Danilovich...)))
  2. +7
    28 November 2023 05: 53
    Russian aristocrats who wanted to lead a “European way of life” were entirely dependent on the British who bought grain from them

    Does this remind you of anything? Replace aristocrats with oligarchs and “capitalist ministers”, grain with oil and gas. And we get a passionate desire from Putin’s inner circle to surrender to their “partners” and gain access to foreign accounts and foreign real estate. And the obvious fear of the “guarantor” of receiving an “apoplectic blow with a snuff box” - in the form of arrest and sending to Milosevic’s cozy cell with a rope and soap carefully placed in a visible place. Prigozhin, for example, has already tried “weakly”, but there may be more determined people.
    1. +7
      28 November 2023 10: 09
      Hence the conclusion, which has been confirmed more than once by practice. If you are going to dramatically change the course of the country, start with the mandatory purge of the top of your elite. Without this - well, nothing at all. And rely on those who will benefit from this change. And - everything will work out for you.
  3. +6
    28 November 2023 06: 11
    Katya2 created these conspirators. Or the Russian land itself grew it.
    Catherine's golden age is a bluff scribbler. Everyone intrigued against everyone, stole, borrowed money. Guard for feasts and parades. Under Potemkin, did the Guard fight the Turks? You can't drink away tradition, unlike liver
    1. +9
      28 November 2023 07: 10
      Quote: antivirus
      Katya2 created these conspirators. Or the Russian land itself grew it.
      Catherine's golden age is a bluff scribbler. Everyone intrigued against everyone, stole, borrowed money. Guard for feasts and parades. Under Potemkin, did the Guard fight the Turks? You can't drink away tradition, unlike liver

      How paradoxical it is that Elizaveta Petrovna created these conspirators. Under which export duties on commercial grain were reduced, which raised generations of nobles living as their serfs, and not as servants.
      1. +6
        28 November 2023 10: 40
        No - it all started much earlier. And it came from the obvious poverty of the Russian land. When, after the creation of a centralized state, it was necessary to sharply, significantly, increase the army. But there was no money for it. There was nothing to pay the military with. So Grozny took the obvious step - to make them self-sufficient, giving them land in exchange for service.

        But after the Time of Troubles, and perhaps even earlier, problems associated with this appeared. Firstly, the allotment became insufficient due to the increased cost of a set of weapons. For in Europe, the notorious price revolution has begun. Which, for example, the system of the Ottoman Empire could not survive, unlike us. But the most important thing is that no one needs land without workers. That is why, after the election of the Romanovs, the nobles so desperately pushed for the consolidation of the peasants - but what should they do if they demand service, but have nothing to arm themselves with? The peasants are fleeing from hunger and the chaos in the state...

        But Pyotr Alekseevich did not behave entirely logically. If we now have a regular army, paid for by the state, why then should the peasants support the nobles? Yes - he desperately needed a large number of at least somewhat educated people to become officials, and they could only be recruited from among the nobles. And he took the simplest path. Although, it was necessary to focus on the gradual abolition of serfdom, while developing public education. But this was too radical for him, and he probably wouldn’t have been able to do it. The personnel shortage was very severe. But I could take certain steps in this direction. But he didn’t. And after the abolition of the compulsory service in exchange for estates, the people finally ceased to understand why the hell they were feeding all this public. With all the consequences...
        1. +6
          28 November 2023 10: 54
          Yes, I agree that it was the decree “On the Liberty of the Nobility” that became a mine under Russian society. After all, before him, the nobles actually served, they left the estate in their youth, and often returned to it as old men or crippled invalids. The peasants understood that the Bare, of course... were bad people, but they shed blood for their homeland - just like their recruits. And suddenly these bar began to live permanently on the estates and, having nothing better to do, drag girls to the hayloft and “be original” with their brothers, like Nekrasov:
          “The law is my desire!
          The fist is my police!
          1. 0
            28 November 2023 11: 08
            Quote: vet
            And suddenly these bare began to live permanently on estates and, having nothing better to do, drag girls to the hayloft and “be original” with their brothers, like Nekrasov

            Nikolai Alekseevich was called a libertine and even a scoundrel by many evil contemporaries.
            Perhaps the famous poet composed a poem about himself?
            1. +2
              28 November 2023 11: 14
              But he, if anything, is not like Obolt-Obolduev - he is loving! laughing
              And with tears in his eyes - constantly grieving for the people, probably.
          2. +2
            28 November 2023 11: 16
            Quote: vet
            After all, before him the nobles actually served

            And after that too))
            1. VLR
              +4
              28 November 2023 11: 25
              But what about the 1541 officers who fictitiously “served” under Catherine II in the Horse Guards alone? And 57 not only who did not serve anywhere, but also completely illiterate nobles discovered in 1800 in the Voronezh province?
              1. +2
                28 November 2023 11: 39
                And who commanded the Suvorov and Rumyantsev miracle heroes?
                Aren't they nobles?
                In reality, it became unnecessary to serve in the second half of the 19th century. Before that, Nobles lick!
                1. VLR
                  +5
                  28 November 2023 11: 44
                  I repeat: 1541 nobles sat on estates, but were listed in the Horse Guards - under Catherine II, and not in the middle of the 57th century. And 1800 noblemen who had never served anywhere and were completely illiterate in XNUMX in the Voronezh province - also not the middle of the XNUMXth century.
                  1. +2
                    28 November 2023 11: 56
                    Quote: VlR
                    I repeat: 1541 nobles sat on estates, but were listed in the Horse Guards

                    Don’t you think that this has nothing to do with the notorious “Liberty of the Nobility”?)))
                    What did the decree say? About the fact that the nobles they have a right don't serve. What does your example say? About the fact that the nobles considered necessary at least be in service!
                    That is. these things are not connected in any way.
                    Quote: VlR
                    And 57 noblemen who had never served anywhere and were completely illiterate, in 1800.

                    But this is just about liberties. These nobles actually did not serve anywhere. (they didn’t take someone else’s place, didn’t take bribes, didn’t steal from soldiers), and therefore had no rank and couldn’t enjoy privileges.
                  2. 0
                    29 November 2023 07: 09
                    I repeat: 1541 nobles sat on estates, but were listed in the Horse Guards - under Catherine II

                    These were youngsters who were waiting for the age at which they could immediately receive a rank in the guard. As a rule, they immediately went to army regiments with a promotion of two ranks, since guards officers had a seniority of two ranks according to the table of ranks.
                    1. VLR
                      +1
                      29 November 2023 08: 29
                      And this, in your opinion, is normal? But the great Turenne, whom Napoleon called a teacher - an aristocrat of aristocrats, began to serve as a private.
                      1. 0
                        29 November 2023 11: 08
                        Quote: VlR
                        And this, in your opinion, is normal?

                        Didn’t this practice begin in the time of Anna Ioannovna?)))
                      2. VLR
                        +1
                        29 November 2023 12: 44
                        Does it matter when? The important thing is that this is “no way”, and, of course, is a shameful page in the history of the Russian army.
                      3. +1
                        29 November 2023 14: 44
                        Quote: VlR
                        Does it matter when?

                        It’s just that one for you is an example of an empress, the other is a fiend of hell))
                        What is important for the discussion is that this is not Catherine’s fault.
                2. 0
                  28 November 2023 15: 40
                  However, military service, introduced under Alexander the Second, also extended to nobles.
                  1. +1
                    28 November 2023 15: 51
                    Quote: Sergej1972
                    However, military service, introduced under Alexander the Second, also extended to nobles.

                    Formally, yes. In fact...those who graduated from the gymnasium served for six months, and the university for three months. They could live in an apartment, were not involved in dressing up, etc. and so on.
                    But that's not the point. With a certain stretch, it can be formulated this way: During the time of Alexander the Liberator, being a railway engineer became much more prestigious than being an officer.
  4. +6
    28 November 2023 06: 26
    "Conspiracy of the Beneficent"
    “These are not the people? These are worse than the people! These are the best people of the city!” (c) laughing
  5. +6
    28 November 2023 08: 15
    Russian aristocrats against Emperor Paul I.
    And what? The aristocrats are allowed, this is the emperor from among them. The people cannot be opposed to this. This is even now condemned. But there are all their own... smile
  6. +3
    28 November 2023 08: 35
    I have read about these events many times, but never in such a good presentation!
    1. VLR
      +2
      28 November 2023 09: 05
      Thank you, Vyacheslav, I tried, as always smile
      1. +3
        28 November 2023 21: 42
        Thank you, Vyacheslav, I tried, as always

        Valery, good evening!
        Despite the fact that I am a fan of your work, may I allow you a friendly remark, sir? wink The article came out well, but as someone who is fascinated by the era of Paul, I must comment on some points. soldier Just mind you, no offense! drinks
        “Once Paul asked him: “They say that there is a conspiracy against me and you are one of the conspirators.” Palen paused in his bow for a moment, returned his normal expression, and replied, “How can this happen when we have a Secret Expedition?”

        You used Tol's notes. drinks But there is a book "Regicide March 11, 1801", which was published during the reign of the Tsar. I must say, this is the first printed material that was released about this conspiracy; before that it was taboo. stop So, after the murder, Langeron interviewed a number of the leaders of the conspiracy. He asked Palen too. He, according to Langeron, told him the opposite! request Count Palen then admitted to Pavel that there was a conspiracy, moreover, that he himself was at the head of the conspiracy in order to hold all the threads.
        Paul replied: “All this is true,” he answered, “but, of course, there is no need to doze off.”
        In general, both Palen and Bennigsen told Langeron quite a bit... fellow
        “Look how funny the mirror is; I see myself in it with my neck to the side.”

        The entire last day of Emperor Pavel Petrovich was shrouded in mystical events, according to the recollections of four different people. Yes
        1. What you mentioned.
        2. When Pavel played with the younger children. After they began to be carried away, he suddenly shouted: "Annushka, Annushka here!". The child was returned, and the Tsar himself took off the icon and put it in his daughter’s clothes.
        3. Young Mikhail Palych (future head of artillery) played some unique game in the evening - he pretended to bury someone. He was asked what he did. The boy replied: "I'm burying my father." He was forbidden to do this, but he continued anyway, saying that he was now burying the grenadier. feel (This was personally recalled by Nikolai Palych, who was with Mikhail and saw it all). soldier
        4. A small dog, a Spitz, did not leave Pavel all day and evening, and often howled...
        Meanwhile, Platon Zubov and Leonty Bennigsen came to Palen’s house.

        Let me clarify. Was two dinner. At first, drunken guards gathered in groups of apartments. Then there was a general dinner, where Palen said his famous words about eggs and scrambled eggs. hi

        In general, it is still not known who was the first conspirator, who was the first to voice the idea of ​​the conspiracy. Contemporaries accuse Zherebtsova and Whitworth, and Panin, and Platon Zubov of various configurations between them. We'll hardly ever figure this out. request

        Looking forward to the continuation, Valery! Thank you! drinks
  7. +5
    28 November 2023 09: 03
    "Poor Pavel, poor prince."
    1. +2
      28 November 2023 21: 54
      "Poor Pavel, poor prince."

      Absolutely true! drinks
      Finally we came to a large square, between the bridge over the Neva and the Senate building. He walked to one, as it were, pre-marked place in the square, where at that time a monument to Peter the Great was being erected; I, of course, followed him and then stopped.
      “Goodbye, Pavel,” he said, “you will see me again here and somewhere else.”
      At the same time, his hat rose as if by itself, and my eyes were presented with the eagle gaze, dark forehead and stern smile of my great-grandfather Peter the Great. When I came to my senses from fear and surprise, he was no longer in front of me...

      This is Grand Duke Paul's account of a vision in St. Petersburg, Brussels, 1782. The erected monument to Peter is the Bronze Horseman. drinks
  8. +9
    28 November 2023 09: 24
    Quote from Kojote21
    the emperor was dissatisfied with it (the project) ...

    Oh my God!
    All adults are people! Does anyone in their right mind continue to believe that serfdom was not abolished simply because of the villainy of the reigning person?
    Starting with Catherine, the Russian autocrats understood perfectly well that this atavism was a time bomb placed under the empire, that serfdom hampered the development of the empire, etc.
    It took the work of two great emperors, Alexander Pavlovich and Nikolai Pavlovich, just to build what is now commonly called the vertical of power. Before Nicholas I, power in Russia went along the lines of Tsar, landowner, and peasant. The withdrawal of the peasantry from the power of the landowner meant the immediate collapse of the entire state.
    Only after the efforts of Nikolai Pavlovich in Russia created a power apparatus relatively independent of the free nobility, his son Alexander the Liberator managed to abolish serfdom relatively painlessly. Relatively, because fragments of noble permissiveness in the form of redemption payments for land overtook Russia in 1905 and, already with a rebound, in 1917.
    1. +5
      28 November 2023 10: 22
      Russian autocrats understood perfectly well

      The problem was not only serfdom. But rather, in the decree on the liberties of the nobility. According to which the nobleman was no longer obliged to serve. Thus, the result was garbage - the state was deprived of the advantages of having a service class, but at the same time raked in all the disadvantages of having an unfree majority of the population. Which is obvious stupidity, of course...
      Before Nicholas I, power in Russia went along the lines of Tsar, landowner, peasant

      Not always. This is a later education. Starting with the reforms of Grozny, zemstvo self-government played a very important role. One might say - decisive. And which was not at all noble. The nobleman was a purely military service class. The state you describe is rather the result of the activities of Pyotr Alekseevich, who built, so to speak, a rigid vertical of power based on the bureaucracy. It was really only possible to take it on such a scale from the nobles, as the most educated part of the population.
      1. +1
        28 November 2023 13: 05
        Earthly self-government was precisely that of the nobility
        1. +1
          28 November 2023 14: 01
          It depends on what period. Before the Romanovs - no. Zemstvo self-government was precisely that of the people. Just look at the history of the Time of Troubles and the same Minin. It was the zemstvo that, by its own will, decided to collect the militia and maintain it. And Pozharsky and the nobles were already invited as military specialists.
          1. +3
            28 November 2023 14: 35
            What other folk? These people are the nobles; no one considered the tax peasants to be the people.
  9. +4
    28 November 2023 09: 24
    Quote: kalibr
    I have read about these events many times, but never in such a good presentation!

    Hmmm!? Is this called good? Oh well!
  10. +3
    28 November 2023 09: 34
    Regarding the assessment of Pavel's personality and mental abilities.
    Is it a great mind to cancel the awarding of the Order of St. George? This one step irrevocably turned the army away from him. To put into disgrace the only person whose presence in the capital made any coup absolutely impossible, I mean Suvorov, is this from a great mind?
    Well, okay, is it a great mind to want to do in a few years what took two great emperors more than half a century to accomplish?
    To create an environment around yourself in which an officer taking guard duty in the palace always had “Katya” with him in his stash, because from the guard he could easily go not home but to Kamchatka, is this from a great mind?
    I am already silent that replacing the main ally from England to France did not give Russia anything at best, but only left Russia alone with the “United Europe”, making the very existence of the country dependent on the mood of one person.
    How the French treated the Russians can be read from Baron Marbot, by the way.
    Even if we assume that Paul had very noble motives for his actions, it is worth remembering from the anecdote:
    Madam! Do you want checkers or go?
    Alas, checkers!
    1. +5
      28 November 2023 10: 41
      Quote: Grossvater
      Cancel from a great mind

      Quote: Grossvater
      To fall into disgrace

      Pavel Petrovich did not know how to understand people, even those few who were devoted to him were not confident in their future, under him there was a continuous series of resignations of officials, Pavel Petrovich himself could not distinguish between big matters and small ones, he tried to delve into everything, even petty matters. For this reason, there are all sorts of evil myths about his mental abilities.
    2. +2
      28 November 2023 11: 21
      Quote: Grossvater
      To bring into disgrace the only person whose presence in the capital made any coup absolutely impossible, I mean Suvorov,

      In my opinion, you confused Alexander Vasilyevich with Alexey Andreevich))
      However, there is a legend that Kakhovsky offered Suvorov to overthrow the emperor, but he indignantly refused. - Shut up! You can't! Blood of fellow citizens!

      Quote: Grossvater
      I am already silent that replacing the main ally from England to France did not give Russia anything at best

      Apart from the collapse of the economy...
  11. +4
    28 November 2023 09: 36
    Quote: vet
    Doesn't this remind you of anything?

    Well, how tired of all this! Go download it at home!
  12. +5
    28 November 2023 09: 38
    Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
    How paradoxical it is that Elizaveta Petrovna created these conspirators. Under which export duties on commercial grain were reduced, which raised generations of nobles living as their serfs, and not as servants.

    And it seems like Peter III abolished compulsory service for nobles?
  13. BAI
    +1
    28 November 2023 09: 56
    Palen was 55 years old at this time, but he still retained vigor in both body and spirit

    Yes, in modern times, this is the very dawn of strength and health.
    1. +5
      28 November 2023 10: 19
      As a doctor, I don’t quite agree: even now there are plenty of people at this age (55 years old) who are absolutely unhealthy, or people who are already experiencing certain difficulties in performing ordinary duties and not at all extreme loads. So, 55 years still cannot be called the time of “the very dawn of strength and health.” Here, after 35, many, if you listen to them, like Carlson, are “the most seriously ill in the world.” I think that in the 18th and 19th centuries people either did not live to be 55 years old, or, if they did, they were, thanks to natural review, “aliver” and more active than today. It’s just that those who still had teeth probably had problems with their teeth. The same Suvorov, when crossing the Alps, if I’m not mistaken, was 70 years old - and he walked along with everyone else, he was not carried on a stretcher.
  14. +5
    28 November 2023 10: 17
    "Canaglia" literally means "pack of dogs" in Italian. But later they began to call swindlers and swindlers that way.

    Sometimes a flock of sheep is enough. Just yesterday I watched the video. A small flock in the corral, a shepherd came in, the older ram decided that he, as the dominant individual, was encroaching on his females, began to kill the shepherd and finally killed him - the pen was closed, the shepherd, severely stunned after the first blow, had nowhere to go.
    That's it.
    There is video from the surveillance system, but there is no shepherd. It’s bad when there is no one to help in time. Isolation is not a security option.
  15. +1
    28 November 2023 10: 32
    Quote: paul3390
    a rigid vertical of power based on bureaucracy.

    I agree, but this vertical line only reached the landowner.
    There was no other power over the peasants, and this is at least 90% of the country's population.
    1. +3
      28 November 2023 11: 26
      Quote: Grossvater
      There was no other power over the peasants, and this is at least 90% of the country's population.

      According to the 1857 audit, approximately half (49%) of the peasants employed in the agricultural sector were not landowners, but government workers.
      1. +2
        28 November 2023 15: 53
        More precisely, state ones. Plus there were also appanage peasants. Before the abolition of serfdom, there were more state and appanage peasants in total than landowners.
  16. +3
    28 November 2023 10: 39
    Quote: paul3390
    Thus, the result was garbage - the state was deprived of the advantages of having a service class, but at the same time raked in all the disadvantages of having an unfree majority of the population. Which is obvious stupidity, of course...

    Again I agree!
    That's just forced stupidity. One of the forms of payment for numerous palace coups, an attempt to appease the overly influential noble society.
    By the way, the thought of whether my own nobles would ruin me did not leave the Russian tsars until the very end (rightly so, they did not).
    The leaders of the nobility, who by the way headed the zemstvo institutions, were considered the highest representatives of the crown power in the localities.
    So, the district leaders did not submit to the provincial leaders in any way, so that a second, parallel structure of power would not be formed.
  17. +1
    28 November 2023 11: 31
    Much more dangerous was another conspiracy, organized with the help of the British by the highest dignitaries and aristocrats of the Russian Empire.

    How wretched (from the author’s point of view) Russians are...
    They can’t even form a conspiracy on their own!
    It is necessary for Whitworth to come to Zubov and promise one hundred guineas for the murder of the Tsar. And Palen jumped out of the corner and shouted: “Everyone!”
    1. VLR
      +3
      28 November 2023 11: 37
      But no one ever doubted England’s participation. The same Napoleon then carelessly wrote:
      "If only at the time when England plotted the assassination of Paul I, knew that the instigators of the conspiracy were at a distance of one league from the border, would they really not have tried to capture them?

      And the reaction of Alexander, who hated Bonaparte and never forgave him, proves that the blow was struck precisely and to the very heart. If Bonaparte had lied, Alexander and his courtiers would have laughed, shrugged and forgotten in a couple of days.
      Napoleon, by the way, also said about the murder of Paul:
      “The British missed me in Paris, but they didn’t miss me in St. Petersburg!”
      1. +6
        28 November 2023 12: 02
        Quote: VlR
        But no one ever doubted England’s participation.

        Well, this is our tradition. if something goes wrong, then anyone is to blame, but not ourselves) request
        Quote: VlR
        And the reaction of Alexander, who hated Bonaparte

        Napoleon hinted at participation in the murder of his father. Which is, as it were, quite obvious.
        The fact that almost the entire elite hated their king, and the heir did not want to wait for forty years before power, risking ceasing to be the heir (and there were such plans), was not the British’s fault.
        Actually, there are two questions here. Did Whitworth know about the conspiracy? Yes!. This is his job.
        Was it its organizer? Definitely not.
        1. VLR
          +4
          28 November 2023 12: 10
          The initiative to remove Paul from power came from both sides. Both the British and Russian aristocrats were interested. One can argue about the degree of participation of the British ambassador. But the English money paid to Zherebtsova immediately after the murder of Pavel - she specifically, as soon as she learned about the murder, went from Berlin to London to get it - and brazenly appropriated it for herself - evidence that the English money was promised to the conspirators in advance. By whom? Only Whitworth.
          1. +2
            28 November 2023 12: 42
            Quote: VlR
            But the English money paid to Zherebtsova immediately after the murder of Pavel

            Er... was there a boy?
            Proof of the English trace in the murder of Paul I is the 2 million rubles that Olga Zherebtsova received in London immediately after the assassination of the emperor.

            First of all, not right away. Zherebtsova arrived in London only a year later.
            Secondly, not two million rubles, but ten thousand pounds sterling. The EMNIP rate then was 30 pence per ruble, that is, approximately eighty thousand rubles.
            It’s just that Whitworth, while he was away from Zherebtsova, suddenly married the Duchess of Dorset, and paid compensation to his former mistress so that she would not raise a scandal.
            And it would be very strange if Olga Alexandrovna shared this money with anyone else)))
            1. VLR
              +2
              28 November 2023 12: 57
              10 thousand pounds is separate, I will write about it. And an amount equivalent to 2 million rubles, according to the testimony of contemporaries, was paid by the English government. And the fact that Zherebtsova appropriated them offended many of the conspirators, but they did not dare to be openly indignant. And he didn’t care about their indignation, living abroad, from where she returned only in 1810, when some of the participants in Pavel’s murder were no longer alive, for example, her brothers Nikolai and Valerian Zubov, with whom she also did not share.
              1. +3
                28 November 2023 13: 16
                Quote: VlR
                according to the testimony of contemporaries,

                Are you talking about Herzen?
                Quote: VlR
                amount equivalent to 2 million rubles

                Valery, excuse me, do you even understand that oh... a very large amount of money at that time?!!
                And well, it’s just extremely doubtful that such a heap of money would be transferred through a lady with a dubious reputation. Yes
                Quote: VlR
                returned only in 1810

                And the first thing she did was sell her parents’ house for 200 thousand... that there was nothing left of the two lyams? belay
                1. +4
                  28 November 2023 13: 39
                  that there was nothing left of the two Lyamas at all?

                  So that a Russian aristocrat could not spend 10 million abroad in 2 years? You offend! laughing
                  1. +3
                    28 November 2023 14: 07
                    Quote: vet
                    but failed to spend 10 million abroad in 2 years?

                    In other words, the scale of the amount is not clear to you?
                    And at the same time, do you firmly believe that the cunning Englishmen have not found any other way to transfer money for a service already rendered to them, other than to give it to the first person they come across... to a woman of non-difficult behavior?
                    I have no more questions request
      2. +2
        28 November 2023 12: 25
        And the reaction of Alexander, who hated Bonaparte
        What passions. smile Since it went off topic. I’ll add four and a half kopecks. By 1808, Sweden did not take part in the economic blockade of Great Britain. After the defeat in the Russian-Swedish war of 1808-1809, she joined. It was not love... smile
    2. +3
      28 November 2023 12: 21
      laughing
      How wretched (from the author’s point of view) the Russians are... They can’t even form a conspiracy on their own!
      laughinggood And most importantly, they are hungry for money. laughing As “British scientists” have established, the Russian bottling, even E. Pugachev, was bribed by the French, either the barrel of gold was transported across Europe, or it was transferred online, through Pochta-Bank. laughing
      1. VLR
        +2
        28 November 2023 12: 27
        The French did not bribe Pugachev, but they took some part in the case of “Princess Tarakanova”. Not what they would like in St. Petersburg. But the British helped Alexei Orlov a lot back then.
        1. +3
          28 November 2023 12: 32
          The French did not bribe Pugachev
          Naturally, they didn’t bribe, “Post-Bank” didn’t exist then. laughing
  18. +5
    28 November 2023 13: 47
    The main mistake of Pavel Petrovich was that he undertook to “drain the swamp” (from) the later Catherine’s legacy without taking care of three fundamental things:
    1) Create an inner circle. Those. he needs a new environment, capable and owing his rise personally to him. And the leapfrog of the return is only harmful and only inflames the anger of those returned. The replacement of elites must be carried out gradually, but without vacillation.
    2) If you decide to dragon the Praetorians, then first create a personal, dedicated guard. Those. We need a couple of new guards regiments with personally elevated officers. Protection of residence only by them.
    3) Understanding the relationship between sons (the most difficult thing). It is possible to officially announce an heir immediately.
    Well, again, the mistakes were superimposed on the hereditary Romanov tendency to tyranny.
    It would seem that a person had been waiting so long for the throne, he could have thought everything over. And he seemed to think that anointing was enough for power, although he knew exactly the history of his dynasty.
  19. +5
    28 November 2023 14: 04
    The author has a great talent for presenting events and facts, and the power of this talent far exceeds his own convictions.

    If you simply read the beautifully presented text, you get the impression that Pavel is a useless leader who does not understand people, a capricious tyrant who, based on momentary moods, does whatever comes into his head. At the same time, Pavel is not vindictive, has no sadistic inclinations, is an idealist and, it seems, a perfectionist, which makes him an even worse manager. It seems that he considers other people to be entirely noble idealists and, if he sees a discrepancy, he gets terribly angry.

    Judging by the text, in which the Author presents the events in great detail and convincingly, at that time Paul himself created the ground for the conspiracy and he himself got into it solely thanks to his own talents.

    At the same time, the Author asserts something that is not at all what he practically proved with his own text.
  20. 0
    28 November 2023 16: 44
    Quote: VlR
    And the reaction of Alexander, who hated Bonaparte and never forgave him,

    This is according to Sokolov, remember where this outstanding historian is now and for what reason.
    It seems to me that Bezotosny’s ​​position is more balanced. He has several books, specifically on Russia’s participation in anti-Napoleonic activities. I advise you to read it.
    1. +4
      28 November 2023 17: 22
      Of course, I apologize wildly, but where Sokolov ended up should not affect the assessment of his works.
  21. +3
    28 November 2023 16: 47
    Quote: S.Z.
    at that time, Pavel himself created the ground for the conspiracy and he himself got into it solely thanks to his own talents.

    Let's just say that it significantly expanded the social base of the conspirators. Let’s imagine the well-being of some officer, who was not only forbidden to wear the Georgiy he earned with his blood, but was also forced to guess where he would return today after guard duty and parade!
    1. VLR
      +1
      29 November 2023 09: 15
      Were there many officers in St. Petersburg with honestly earned “Georges”? Considering. that the guard after Peter I actually fought only in 1805 - it was crushed to dust, and it was not sent to the front again until World War I. (on Bloody Sunday the guardsmen “fought war”, and then the Semyonovites in Moscow drowned the popular uprising in blood). And the aristocrats did not forgive Nicholas II for sending the guards regiments to the front in World War I.
      Paul I was afraid of officers who could not and did not want to serve honestly. And here is what Arakcheev wrote, for example:
      "In Gatchina, the service was difficult, but pleasant, because diligence was always noticed, and knowledge of the matter and serviceability were distinguished."
      1. +1
        29 November 2023 11: 57
        Quote: VlR
        Were there many officers in St. Petersburg with honestly earned “Georges”?

        Or maybe you should read the statute first?
        The order was given exclusively for military merit, and even Grand Duke Constantine became a knight after personally participating in the battle of Austerlitz.
        Therefore, if the St. George Cross, then in any case it was “honestly earned”
        Quote: VlR
        Considering. that the guard after Peter I actually fought only in 1805 - it was crushed to dust, and it was not sent to the front again until World War I.

        If you don’t know something, it doesn’t mean it didn’t happen!
        Composition of Russian troops in the Russian-Swedish War of 1808-1809
        Life Guards Grenadier Regiment, Life Guards Jaeger Regiment, Life Guards Preobrazhensky Regiment, Life Guards Izmailovsky Infantry Regiment, Azov Musketeer Regiment, Belozersky Musketeer Regiment, Libavsky Musketeer Regiment, Nevsky Musketeer Regiment, Petrovsky Musketeer Regiment, Pernovsky Musketeer Regiment, Brest Musketeer Regiment, Velikolutsk Musketeer Regiment, Vilmanstrand Musketeer Regiment, Kaluga Musketeer Regiment, Kex Golm Musketeer Regiment, Kremechug Musketeer Regiment, Mogilev Musketeer Regiment, Navaginsky Musketeer Regiment, Nizovsky Musketeer Regiment, Perm Musketeer Regiment, Polotsk Musketeer Regiment, Ryazan Musketeer Regiment, Revel Musketeer Regiment, Sevsky Musketeer Regiment, Tenginsky Musketeer Regiment, Tula Musketeer Regiment, 1st Jaeger Regiment, 2nd Jaeger Regiment , 23rd Jaeger Regiment, 24th Jaeger Regiment, 26th Jaeger Regiment, 30th Jaeger Regiment, 31st Jaeger Regiment, Life Guards Cossack Regiment, Mitavsky Dragoon Regiment, Grodno Hussar Regiment, 20 guns. Total about 35 thousand people, 20 guns

        In the War of 1812, the guards were mainly in reserve, but... cavalry guards and horse guards as part of the cuirassier division attacked the French at the Raevsky battery
        The cavalry regiment was commanded by Colonel Baron Levenwolde. He set the first squadron into a gallop and, turning his horse to the left, managed to shout to the commander of the fourth squadron, Captain Davydov: “Command, Evdokim Vasilyevich, left shoulder!” before he was killed by buckshot. Colonel Levashov took his place in front of the regiment. While this happened, the first line hesitated for a second, but, supported by the second, boldly cut into the enemy column. Part of the enemy cavalry (Polish cuirassiers) managed to turn to the right and take the cavalry guards on the flank, but the horse guards rescued them, rushed to the attack and repulsed the Poles. A hand-to-hand fight began between the men-at-arms.

        Then the Foreign Campaign. Battle of Kulm.
        The Russian Guard under the command of Count Osterman Tolstoy held back, at the cost of heavy losses, the onslaught of three times the forces of the French corps of Vandamme

        Russian-Turkish War of 1828-29. The Life Guards Sapper Battalion especially distinguished itself.
        Russian-Turkish War of 1877-78. Plevna, crossing the Balkans
        In the Russian-Turkish War, the first assaults on Plevna took place, as is known, in 1877-1878. , ,
        unsuccessful and the Russian army had to move on to a systematic siege of the fortress.
        its blockade it was necessary to take Mountain Dubnyak Telish and Dolny Dubnyak covering , ,
        highway This task fell to the Guards Corps and the Guards Rifle Division. {98}. 2- ,
        brigade and Sapper battalion attacked Gorny Dubnyak while I division and 1st
        The guards cavalry covered the attack from Plevna by Finland's men. thirty
        The regiment managed to break into the small redoubt and held it until reinforcements arrived.
        companies of the Infantry Regiment rushed to occupy the Turkish lodgements in front of the ditch covering it,
        a large redoubt and with the onset of dusk, they captured fortification B in a bayonet battle, {99}.
        In December, the guards rangers were replaced at the Shindara mountain position by Izmailovsky 1877.
        The regiment was covering the passages through the mountains. In two weeks, the regiment lost a man. Situation, . 551.
        was incredibly heavy. The Commander-in-Chief reported the Guards troops from the parking lot and. : "
        work in the High Balkans and during the march through them, both officers and
        The lower ranks have been without boots for a long time and now finally without trousers. Uniforms and overcoats.
        , . , only rags and even without lint, only fiber on them Most people don’t have linen, but some
        it remained in shreds and decayed. Despite this, the guards stubbornly overcame “{100}. ,
        mountains that were considered absolutely inaccessible in winter

        This is not to mention the fact that guard officers often and densely served at headquarters in the active army or are on business trips, even if their regiments did not participate in this campaign.

        Dear author, tighten up your equipment!
        1. VLR
          0
          29 November 2023 12: 54
          Therefore, if the St. George Cross, then in any case it was “honestly earned”

          The question was: during the time of Catherine II, were there many people with the Order or Cross of St. George in St. Petersburg, where the guards who were not fighting at that time were stationed? They were inherited from Catherine by Paul. Of course, there were also “cavaliers”: favorites or relatives of “worthy” people who went into the army and immediately left for St. Petersburg with the news of some kind of victory. And they received extraordinary titles, orders, gifts, money. Valerian Zubov, for example, received his first Order of St. George (4th degree): he barely had time to arrive when Potemkin sent him back with the news of the capture of Bender. And here is the result: the rank of adjutant of the empress, the rank of colonel, the Order of St. George of the 4th degree, 10 thousand rubles in cash and jewelry in the same amount.
          1. +1
            29 November 2023 14: 55
            Quote: VlR
            Valerian Zubov, for example, received his first Order of St. George (4th degree): he barely had time to arrive when Potemkin sent him back with the news of the capture of Bender.

            Valery, have you forgotten that I wrote to you about the materiel? feel
            For the news of the capture of Bender Zubov, he was awarded not an order, but 10 rubles and valuable gifts for the same amount.
            As for the Order of St. George, 4th class, Zubov was awarded it three years later for distinction during the capture of Ishmael.
            The third class of the same order for the suppression of the Kosciuszko uprising, and the star of the second for the capture of Derbent.
            Of course, I understand that the Zubovs are unpleasant to you, but maybe you shouldn’t be so open?
            1. VLR
              0
              29 November 2023 15: 52
              Yes, here with Zubov’s “Georgiy” I have now confused two episodes - Bendery and Ishmael, I admit smile
              1. -3
                30 November 2023 20: 43
                Not only are you biased, but your level of knowledge is also insufficient to write articles that claim to be reliable.
  22. +2
    28 November 2023 17: 21
    Quote: Grossvater
    Let's just say that it significantly expanded the social base of the conspirators.

    I think he created it. The conspirators are persons close to the emperor; with his chaotic behavior, he made them fear for their future.

    Out of fear, they grabbed him.
  23. -1
    28 November 2023 17: 24
    but the regicides are still Bolsheviks)))
  24. 0
    1 March 2024 14: 23
    And why condemn Ivan the Terrible? He pressed the boyars so hard that they were afraid to squeak again. If Paul had acted the same way, he would have ruled for another ten to fifteen years.