Continuation of the Russian career of the Irishman Lassi. Colonel becomes lieutenant general

23
Continuation of the Russian career of the Irishman Lassi. Colonel becomes lieutenant general
P. Lassi in a portrait of the XNUMXth century. works by unknown artist


В previous article it was told about the youth of Peter Lassi, the beginning of the Northern War and the military path of this Irish officer from the unfortunate battle of Narva to the brilliant Battle of Poltava. Today we will continue this story.



Swedish shame at Perevolochnaya


After the Battle of Poltava, Peter I made an obvious mistake: having arranged a feast with the captured “teachers,” he forgot to give orders to pursue the enemy army. Only late in the evening were the dragoons of R. Bour and M. Golitsyn sent in pursuit of the Swedes, and the next day Alexander Menshikov, who was entrusted with general leadership, joined the pursuit. However, it was this mistake that led to the unheard-of shame of the surrender of the Swedish army at Perevolochnaya. Menshikov was late, and Charles XII had already managed to cross the Dnieper, but there is no doubt that if the king had still remained with his troops, the Swedes would have easily repulsed the attacks of the Russian dragoons, who were significantly inferior to them in numbers. Now the Swedish troops were led by the morally broken General Adam Ludwig Levenhaupt, who had been defeated at Lesnaya before Poltava. Some of the Swedish soldiers panicked, but there were enough people ready to fight to organize a defense. Moreover, as the Swedish general Kreutz later claimed, the horses of the Russian dragoons literally fell off their feet from fatigue, and the people were also extremely tired. But Levenhaupt declared at the military council that

“It is better to surrender on somewhat honorable terms than to continue to experience happiness weapons. "

The defeat of the Swedes near Poltava and the subsequent capitulation of their army near Perevolochnaya became a sensation on a pan-European scale. What especially shocked everyone was the surrender of the seemingly invincible soldiers of Charles XII. The British Ambassador Charles Whitworth, for example, reports:

“Maybe in the whole stories there is no such example of submissive submission to fate on the part of so many regular troops.”

The Danish ambassador Georg Grund was also completely at a loss, writing:

“Such a multitude of armed men, reaching 14-15 thousand, divided into regiments and equipped with generals and officers, did not dare to draw their swords, but surrendered to a much smaller enemy. If their horses could carry them, and they themselves could hold a sword in their hands, then it seems to everyone that giving up without a fight is too much.”

In fact, the Swedes themselves calculated that 18 people surrendered at Perevolochna without a fight. Among them were Field Marshal Rönschild, generals Schlippenbach, Roos, Hamilton, Stackelberg and the head of the royal campaign office, Karl Pieper. Alexander Menshikov, who accepted their surrender, had 367 thousand cavalrymen at his disposal. Russian trophies included 9 guns, 21 howitzers, 2 mortars, 8 banners and 142 thousand thalers.

Having learned about these events, Stanislav Leszczynski chose to renounce the Polish crown - the Saxon Elector Augustus the Strong, an ally of Peter I, again became king of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Charles XII also surprised everyone, who, instead of intensively preparing for revenge, sat in Bendery for 5 years, withdrawing pretending to be the Sultan and Turkish officials, as well as selflessly fighting with the Janissaries guarding him (who called him “Demirbash”, that is, “iron head”). What gave these “battles” a special charm was the fact that the Janissaries protected him from a possible attack by the Russians and, more than anything else, were afraid of causing the “distinguished guest” even the slightest harm. This was discussed in the article "Vikings" against the Janissaries. The incredible adventures of Charles XII in the Ottoman Empire, published December 18, 2019.

Meanwhile, the neighbors were already preparing to tear the Kingdom of Sweden apart. Prussia laid claim to Pomerania. Mecklenburg intended to annex Wismar. Denmark wanted to receive the Duchy of Bremen and Holstein. In the east, Russian troops continued to gain victories. In June 1710, Vyborg was taken (Peter I called it “St. Petersburg's strong pillow"), in July - Gelsinfors (Helsinki). In October of the same year, Revel (Tallinn) and Riga fell, the commandant of which, as we remember, was the hero of our article, Peter Lassi. But in 1711, the series of victories of the Russian army was interrupted by the humiliating defeat of the adventurous and extremely poorly prepared Prut campaign. This is how the future first emperor of Russia himself imagined this expedition:


Allegorical image of the Prut campaign, made before it began

However, Peter I then successively, one after another, repeated all the mistakes of the Russian campaign of Charles XII - and he himself admitted it. Aubrey de la Mottere claims that, seeing his army surrounded, the Russian autocrat said to his generals:

“I found myself in the same difficult situation as my brother Karl near Poltava.”

Then

“withdrew to his tent, forbidding anyone to enter it.”

Prut trip


Sultan Ahmet III was called to war with Russia by Charles XII, who was in Bendery, who pointed out that Russia was now forced to keep its main forces on other fronts. The French Ambassador Desalliers spoke about the same thing. Among the supporters of the new war were Akhmet’s mother, Emetullah Rabia Gulnush Sultan, the Grand Vizier Baltaci Mehmet Pasha and the Crimean Khan Devlet Giray II.

This is how we see Akhmet III in the miniature of his court painter Levni Abdulselil Celebi. By the way, this Sultan is often compared to Peter I:


And this is Emetullah Rabia Gulnush Sultan, the mother of the Ottoman Sultans Mustafa II and Ahmed III, the daughter of a Greek priest from the city of Rethymno (the island of Crete, which then belonged to Venice), who fell into slavery at the age of three, her Christian name is Eumania Voria:


Arolsen Klebeband. Portrait of Emetullah Rabia Gulnush Sultan

And the Grand Vizier Baltaci Mehmet Pasha, who came from a family whose men were engaged in collecting firewood (“balta” - “axe”):


On November 9, 1710, the Ottoman Empire declared war on Russia. The fighting began in January 1711, when the Crimean Tatars attacked Ukrainian lands. On January 10, 1711, the Russian army marched from Riga to Kyiv, the commander of which Peter I traditionally appointed B.P. Sheremetyev. In this army were Y. Bruce, A. Repnin, A. Weide, who distinguished themselves at Poltava, and the hero of our article, Pyotr Lassi, whose regiment was part of Repnin’s division. Unfortunately, Peter wanted to take part in this campaign himself, and his stubbornness, and then his state of panic, became the main reasons for the ensuing disaster.

As already noted, the preparation for the trip was simply disgusting. Its participant, the commander of the dragoon brigade, the Frenchman Moreau de Braze, states in the book he published in 1735:

“It is difficult to believe that such a great, powerful sovereign as, without a doubt, Tsar Peter Alekseevich, having decided to wage war against a dangerous enemy and having time to prepare for it throughout the whole winter, did not think about the food of the large army that he brought to the Turkish border! And yet this is the absolute truth. The army did not have food supplies for even eight days.”

In addition, in the Russian army there were a huge number of wives of generals and senior officers, who, according to the testimony of the same Brose, occupied “more than two thousand five hundred carriages, carriages, small and large carts" Some of the transport carts turned out to be loaded not with crackers and cereals for the soldiers (of which very few were taken anyway), but with exquisite foods and wine for people of the “noble class”.

The recent successful experience of defeating the Swedes at Poltava required choosing defensive tactics: giving the Ottomans the opportunity to move forward, losing both people and horses, suffering from infectious diseases, hunger and thirst. Instead, Peter decided to defeat the enemy on his territory. The Russian Tsar also had his own “Mazepas” - the Wallachian ruler Constantin Brancovan (Brincoveanu) and the Moldavian Dmitry Cantemir, who promised to raise an anti-Turkish uprising in their lands and provide the Russian army with food and fodder. Peter also hoped for the Serbs and Bulgarians, he wrote to Sheremetyev:

“The rulers write that as soon as our troops enter their lands, they will immediately unite with them and induce all their numerous people to revolt against the Turks; look at the Serbs... also the Bulgarians and other Christian peoples will rise up against the Turks, and some will join our troops, others will revolt against the Turkish regions; in such circumstances, the vizier will not dare to cross the Danube, most of his troops will scatter, and perhaps they will start a riot.”

The last attempt to prevent a catastrophe was made by the Scottish general in Russian service Ludwig Nikolai von Allart, who on June 14 (25) at a military council advised to take positions on the Dniester and wait for the Turks at the crossing.


Ludwig Nicholas von Allart

But Peter I, who was experiencing a severe attack of “dizziness from success,” rejected this reasonable proposal. It soon became clear that during the journey the Russian army lost 19 thousand people from disease, hunger and thirst, and another 14 thousand soldiers were left to guard communications. Potential allies also failed: Brancovan completely abandoned the war with the Ottomans, Cantemir brought about 6 thousand poorly armed ragamuffins and, citing drought and a locust invasion, did not deliver the promised food. Allart suggested staying in place to put the troops in order and wait for the Turks at a previously prepared position. But Peter I not only ordered to move further along the right bank of the Prut River (towards Wallachia), but also divided the army, sending General K. Renne to the Danube fortress of Brailov. As a result, Russian troops were surrounded by superior forces of the Ottomans and Tatars. The situation was critical, but the fierce resistance of the Russian soldiers caused confusion both among ordinary Turks and in the ranks of the high command. The British Ambassador Sutton recalled:

“Each time the Turks fled back in disarray. After the third attack, their confusion and frustration were so great that one can certainly believe that if the Russians had counterattacked them, they would have fled without any resistance."

The French agent La Motreuil, who was in the Ottoman army, stated:

“The Janissaries have lost their courage.”

And the head of the Janissary corps reported to the Sultan:

“If Moscow had attacked, then they (the Janissaries) would never have been able to hold their ground... the rear Turks had already begun to flee, and if the Muscovites had come out of the camp, the Turks would have abandoned their guns and ammunition.”

The Polish general Poniatowski recalled that the kegaya, that is, the deputy commander-in-chief of the Ottoman army, told him then:

“We risk being overwhelmed, and that will inevitably happen.”

At the military council, the generals of the Russian army suggested that Peter burn the carts,

“to build a Wagenburg from stronger carts and place Volokhs and Cossacks in it, reinforcing them with several thousand infantry, and attack the enemy with the entire army.”

And this was quite possible and feasible. In August 1739, already under Anna Ioannovna, the army of Minich, a comrade-in-arms and rival of Peter Lassi, found itself in a similar situation. Near Stavuchany, it was surrounded by superior forces of the Ottoman troops of Seraskir Veli Pasha and for two days was subjected to continuous attacks from all sides. Finally, on August 17 (28), Minich launched a demonstrative offensive on the enemy’s right flank, but unleashed a powerful blow on the left flank. Result: the Russians lost 13 soldiers killed, the Turks - about a thousand. This is the most bloodless victory in the history of the Russian army. And Minich, the commander whom slanderers accused of being

“washed away the shame of the Prut Peace with streams of Russian blood.”

P. A. Rumyantsev also acted decisively in 1770: at the head of 17 thousand soldiers and several thousand Cossacks, he was surrounded by a 150 thousand-strong Turkish-Tatar army - and defeated it.

And in July 1711, the fate of the campaign hung in the balance; everything could have turned out completely differently. But Sovereign Peter Alekseevich fell into a state of panic, who, according to R. Erebo, on July 21

“I ran back and forth around the camp, beating my chest and could not utter a word.”

Yust Yul also reports:

“As they told me, the king, being surrounded by the Turkish army, fell into such despair that he ran back and forth around the camp like a madman, beat himself in the chest and could not utter a word. Most thought he had a blow."

To complete this picture, “the officers' wives, of which there were many, howled and cried endlessly"(Yust Yul).

And therefore it was decided to make peace with the Turks on any terms. And the position of the Turks was such that the Grand Vizier did not even respond to the first two letters with a proposal for peace negotiations, because he decided that the Russians were trying to somehow deceive him. Moreau de Braze, mentioned above, claims that he asked one of the Ottoman pashas about the reasons for concluding peace:

“He replied that our firmness amazed them, that they did not think to find such terrible opponents in us, that, judging by the position in which we were, and by the retreat we made, they saw that our life would cost them dearly, and decided, without missing a beat, to accept our proposal for a truce in order to remove us... and that they acted prudently, concluding peace on terms honorable to the Sultan and beneficial to his people.”

By the way, having learned about the Turkish encirclement of the Russian army, Charles XII, who was in Bendery, went on horseback to the Turkish camp (he rode 120 versts without stopping), but the Russian troops had already left - just an hour ago. Karl begged the vizier to give him part of the Turkish army and promised to bring Peter I with a rope around his neck, but received a mocking answer:

“Who will govern the state in his (Peter’s) absence? It is not proper for all the kings of the infidels to be away from home.”

Enraged Charles, before leaving the tent, with a sharp blow of his spur tore the hem of the vizier's robe - and Baltaci Mehmet Pasha became the enemy of the Swedish king.

On August 1, at Mogilev, Sheremetyev, in a letter to Peter I, especially noted “Colonel Lesya” and Brigadier Staff, recommending them for promotion in rank. The corresponding decree was signed by Peter two days later, after which Brigadier Lassi was sent ahead of the army to “prepare proper quarters, food and fodder».

One of the most humiliating, but surprisingly tenacious myths of Russian history is associated with the conclusion of the Prut Peace - about the bribery of the Ottoman commander-in-chief of the Turks by the wife of Peter I, Catherine. These rumors were spread throughout Europe by Charles XII, who wanted not only to disgrace Peter, but also to “frame” his enemy, the Grand Vizier (and Commander-in-Chief) Baltaci Mehmet Pasha. This ridiculous version, it seemed, was soon forgotten. But when Catherine unexpectedly ascended the throne in 1725, a certain Rabiner published a book in Leipzig in which he included a story about how the new Empress once allegedly saved the first Russian emperor from captivity. None other than Aubrey de la Mottre, a French Huguenot emigrant who became an agent of Charles XII, wrote on this matter:

“I received information from various Muscovite officers... that Madame Catherine, who later became empress, had very little jewelry, that she did not collect any silver for the vizier.”

And further:

“It is only thanks to Shafirov’s abilities, and not at all to the imaginary gifts of the queen, that the king owes his deliverance on the Prut. As I have said elsewhere, of all the gifts made to the Vizier after the conclusion of the peace treaty, I was very well informed (I repeat this again) not only by the Pasha with whom I was then, but by many other Turks, even the enemies of this Vizier. »


Pyotr Shafirov in a portrait by an unknown artist

In 1732, Voltaire repeated Rabiner's stupid version in a book about Charles XII. And, as they say, “off we go.” But even Pushkin, who studied the circumstances of this case while working on “The History of Peter,” made a note: “It's all nonsense».

In fact, even Baltaci Mehmet Pasha's numerous opponents did not dare to accuse him of taking a bribe. The English envoy Sutton writes that the vizier's behavior:

“He is approved completely and in every detail by the Sultan and all the people, despite everything that was blamed on him, and despite the intrigues of the Swedish king and khan. The Vizier is supported not only by the Sultan and his ministers, but also by the ulema, the largest and best part of the people, the chief of the Janissaries and, in general, all the military leaders and officers, in accordance with whose advice he acted... Only a few of the mob listen to the words of the Swedes and Tatars... ., that the vizier was generously bribed by the king.”

Yes, Shafirov came to the vizier with gifts - because Ottoman etiquette prescribed to show respect to the person with whom you need to talk about business, and there was even a special institution for recording such gifts and deducting interest from them to the treasury. And these were gifts not from Catherine, and not even from Peter I, but from Field Marshal Sheremetyev:

“2 good gilded squeaks, 2 pairs of good pistols, 40 sables worth 400 rubles.”

The results of the Prut campaign were sad: the Russian army lost 2872 people in battles, and 24 from disease, hunger and thirst. Russia was forced to leave the hard-won lands with fortresses, including Azov, Taganrog, and Kamenny Zaton. It was necessary to burn the Azov fleet (more than 413 ships) and withdraw troops from Poland, and refuse to interfere in the affairs of the Zaporozhye Sich. Peter I even agreed to resume paying tribute to the Crimean Khan.

British Ambassador Sutton reports:

“The king undertook, in a separate article, which at his request was not included in the text of the treaty in order to hide the dishonor, to pay the usual previous tribute to the khan in the amount of 40 ducats annually, from which he was released under the last peace.”

Russia even lost the right to keep an ambassador in Istanbul and had to communicate with the Ottoman government through the Crimean Khan.

Having escaped captivity, Peter I, taking Catherine with him, went to improve his health on the waters of Carlsbad. Almost all foreign officersin the name of his royal majesty" thanked "for the services they rendered, especially during this last campaign"and was fired without pay. The mentioned Moreau de Braze wrote 24 years later:

“Field Marshal (Sheremetyev) did not spend too much money releasing all these officers, because he did not pay anyone anything; and to this day my salary for 13 months is being lost behind him.”

As you can see, D. Medvedev was not at all original in his wishes for “a good mood and more health.” Fans of “saving” money under the motto “No money but you hold on“occur in our country with unenviable regularity.

However, Peter Lassi remained in the Russian service, was promoted, and in the same 1711 he married Martha Philippine von Funcken (widow of the Swedish Count Hans Christopher Fröhlich), who bore him 9 children - 4 sons and 5 daughters. One of Lassi's sons, Franz Maurice, became an Austrian imperial marshal.

Continuation of the Russian service of Peter Lassi


The following year, 1712, Repnin's division, which included the Lassi grenadier regiment, was sent to fight in Pomerania. And again Lassi walked ahead, providing forage and provisions. Looking ahead a little, let's say that for the successful completion of this assignment in September he will receive the rank of major general.

In Thorn, Lassi received orders to act against either Grudinsky or Grazensky, a Pole who is called “partisan of the Swedish king" Let us recall that “parties” (also known as “flying detachments”) at that time were regular military formations that operated separately from the main forces. Their military personnel were called partisans (armed groups of civilians in those days were called “cordons”). Grazensky managed to burn down one of the Russian military warehouses, but, having learned about the approach of Lassi, he chose not to engage in battle, but to retreat to Silesia.

In 1713, P. Lassi took part in the battle of Friedrichstadt, and “under the direct command of Peter I" According to the plan for this battle, presented by Maslovsky, the Lassi regiment acted in the center. Then the hero of our article was among the troops besieging Stettin. Historians have information at their disposal that major generals

“Lesy and Shtaf were on duty in the trenches every week... with a change of people.”

Lassi entered Stettin with Russian troops. This city, by the way, was transferred to Prussia as payment for joining the anti-Swedish Northern Alliance.

The formations of Repnin's division were taken to Russia by Brigadier Treiden for winter quarters, settling down "from Luk to Pskov and in Pskov" Repnin spent the winter in Livonia and Estland; of the senior officers, he kept only Lassi with him, which speaks of the high authority that this Irishman already enjoyed in Russian service.

On the northern fronts, the Russian armies and navy generally acted very successfully. On July 27 (August 7), 1714, the Russian fleet won a victory near the Gangut Peninsula (currently Hanko). Peter I received the rank of vice admiral for his participation in it. And on May 24 (June 4), 1719, the Russian fleet won a battle near the island of Ezel (Saarema).

Meanwhile, in 1714, after a 5-year stay on the territory of the Ottoman Empire, Charles XII returned to Sweden. On November 30, 1718, under unclear circumstances, he died during the siege of the Norwegian fortress Fredriksten. Many researchers believe that the king was killed by one of the Swedes, and not with a bullet, but with a button cut from one of his uniforms and filled with lead. This version was confirmed in 1924, when at the site of Karl’s death, a local blacksmith found a button, the diameter of which coincided with the diameter of the bullet hole in the king’s hat. Analysis of DNA traces on this button and on the royal gloves showed the presence of a rare mutation found only in Sweden.


Carl Gustaf Cederstrom. Death of Charles XII


Reconstruction of the death of Charles XII on November 30, 1718 in the front trench near the besieged fortress


The same button that was found by the blacksmith Carl Andersson

Charles XII was succeeded by his sister, Ulrika-Eleanor.

But let's return to Peter Lassi - in 1716 we will see him at the head of three regiments (two guards and Astrakhan), which were often used as marines. A joint landing with the Danes on the Swedish coast was planned. Three Russian ships built in Amsterdam (Portsmouth, Devonshire and Malburg), four Arkhangelsk ships (Uriel, Selafail, Varachail and Yagudiel), Sivers' squadron of 13 arrived in Copenhagen ships (seven battleships, 3 frigates and 3 shnyavas) and Zmaevich's galleys. But it all ended in a huge scandal. Peter I accused the Danes of wanting to conclude a separate peace treaty with the Swedes, the Danes accused him of trying to capture Copenhagen - and brought the capital's garrison to a state of full combat readiness. Further - more: the English king George I demanded the withdrawal of Russian troops from Germany and Denmark and sent Admiral Norris an order to block the Russian fleet. Fortunately, Norris showed prudence at the time: citing some inaccuracies in the wording, he asked for confirmation. By that time, the ministers had convinced George that breaking off relations with Russia would be unprofitable for Britain, since it would lead to the arrest of English merchants and the cessation of imports of strategically necessary goods. Russian ships left Copenhagen, infantry units retreated to Rostock and Mecklenburg, and cavalry to the Polish border. But in order to show everyone that the alliance between Russia and Denmark was not destroyed, one cavalry regiment was left on the territory of this kingdom.

Turning point in the Northern War


In July 1719, the galley fleet of Admiral General F. M. Apraksin attacked the coast of Sweden. The first landing force was led by Apraksin himself: they managed to capture the cities of Sørdetelje and Nyköping, the city of Norrköping was burned by the Swedes themselves, and they also sank 27 of their own merchant ships in its harbor. In addition, iron and copper factories on the island of Ute were destroyed, and on the island of Nekvarn, a cannon factory and 300 already manufactured artillery pieces were captured. The second detachment, commanded by Peter Lassi (about 3500 people), destroyed factories in the vicinity of the city of Gävle and defeated in two battles the Swedish detachments that tried to stand in his way. 10 guns became trophies. And in August, the Russians landed on both sides of the Steksund fairway and approached the Vaxholm fortress, which defended Stockholm. The results of these operations were very impressive: 8 cities and 1363 villages were captured, 140 country houses and castles of Swedish aristocrats were burned, 21 factories, 21 mills and 26 military warehouses were destroyed. The following year, 1720, Russian marines were already operating in the immediate vicinity of Stockholm, S. Solovyov wrote about this:

“Major General Lassi headed towards Stockholm, landed at the town of Grina, and the surrounding country burned: 135 villages, 40 mills, 16 shops, two cities... 9 iron factories were burned out; a huge amount of iron, human and horse feed, which the military men could not take with them, was thrown into the sea.” After some time, he was elected in order to “...land on the Swedish shores and devastate them, burn three towns, 19 parishes, 506 villages with 4159 peasant households.”

Queen Ulrika-Eleanor was forced to resume peace negotiations. And Lassi received the rank of lieutenant general.

July 27 (August 7), 1720 (on the same calendar day as under Gwegut 6 years ago) near the island of Grengam to the Russians fleet Another victory was won over the Swedes. In honor of these victories, the Panteleimon Church was built in St. Petersburg in 1735.


Sweden no longer had the resources for a further war, and on August 30 (September 10), 1721, a peace treaty was signed in Nystadt (currently Uusikaupunki, Finland), which consolidated Russian conquests in the Baltic states. The Swedes “sold” Ingria, Karelia, Estland and Livonia to Russia for 2 million thalers - a huge amount, but that’s exactly how many gold Saxon thalers were captured from the Swedes after the Battle of Poltava, and about 700 thousand more from Perevolochnaya.


Peter Schenk. The signing of the peace treaty in Nishtadt on August 20, 1721


Territories that became part of Russia under the terms of the Nistadt Treaty

On October 22 (November 2), 1721, Peter I accepted the title of Russian Emperor, which was first recognized by Prussia and Holland, and in 1723 by Sweden. But other states initially refused to recognize the imperial title of Russian monarchs. Turkey recognized it as Anna Ioannovna in 1739. Elizaveta Petrovna achieved recognition of herself as Empress of England and Austria in 1742, and Spain and France in 1745. And Catherine II was recognized as empress in 1764 by her former lover Stanislav Poniatowski, who with her help became the last king of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.

As for Lassi, from 1723 until the death of Peter I (January 28, Julian style, 1725), he was a member of the Military Collegium.

The next article will talk about the peak of the military and military leadership career of Pyotr Petrovich Lassi.
23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -3
    6 November 2023 05: 48
    Denis Brig has an article specifically about Lassi... Without this water...
    1. +4
      6 November 2023 06: 23
      There is a proverb: “Who loves a watermelon, and who loves a cartilage back.”
      I like exactly this style - with a description of related events and a presentation of the overall picture. And what? Do I demand that everyone write like this?
      "Let all flowers bloom."
      1. +2
        6 November 2023 06: 37
        I like exactly this style - with a description of related events and a presentation of the overall picture.
        Sure, not a problem.. laughing hi Then the series of articles can be called differently.. A biographical sketch, this series cannot be called hi
    2. 0
      7 November 2023 17: 17
      Denis Brig has an article specifically about Lassi

      Out of curiosity, I decided to google it, but couldn’t find it...
  2. +2
    6 November 2023 06: 21
    Good morning!
    Thank you very much Valery for this essay. Sometimes it’s even interesting to read the works of a well-known Author, anticipating his story in advance. Although it must be admitted that Valery, unlike Vyacheslav, never provokes a specific reader.
    Now to the article.
    On October 22 (November 2), 1721, Peter I accepted the title of Russian Emperor, which was initially recognized by Prussia and Holland,

    The first - essentially, as a result of the Northern War, it became a kingdom, before which the duchy was ruled by a confederate.
    The second one made money and hoped to continue making money.
    At the same time, the imperial title was recognized by other “participants” in the Northern War: Denmark and Saxony, who also received a portion of “goodies”.
    Have a nice day everyone, I'm going to get ready for the service.
    Regards, Kote!
  3. +4
    6 November 2023 06: 28
    The article contains a particularly valuable reminder that Estland and Livonia were sold to Russia. In the 90s, Russia should declare itself not the heir to the debts of the USSR, but the heir to the territories of the Russian Empire, for which the blood of Russian soldiers was shed and money was paid according to the signatures of confirmed international acts of purchase and sale. But the path was chosen, from around the corner to look with envy at the Empire built by Peter the Great and other Russian Emperors and do nothing to revive such an Empire, but on every corner around the world to shout that having robbed the Russians, democratic Russia has thrown itself back within the borders of 400 years, she also paid off debts for the same Estland and Livonia, which when they were republics of the USSR, freely rode on Russia’s neck.
    But under the Tsars and Emperors there was no such freebie for them. What did Pushkin write about “the shelter of a wretched Chukhon”? I wrote it correctly. What they could do was worth it. It was then that the USSR climbed onto the neck and let’s build palaces and cities for them too.
    1. -1
      6 November 2023 07: 07
      I don’t remember in which of the articles I already explained where this myth about the purchase of Estland and Livonia by Peter came from. Yes, in terms of propaganda it looks very slick, but this is a section of the site about history.
      Part of paragraph 5 of the Nystad Peace Treaty:
      “Moreover, the e.c.v. wants to be obliged to be and promises the e.c.v. the amount of two million efimki regularly without deduction and of course from the e.c.v. with the appropriate authorizations and receipts provided to the authorized representative to pay and give indicate such terms and such a coin as that in a separate article, which has the same power and effect, as if it had been entered here word by word, decreed and agreed upon"
      Where does it say what efimiki are paid for? The story there is different and dates back to the end of the Livonian War.
      1. +2
        6 November 2023 18: 08
        What are the downsides? In fact, the author of the article, Mr. Ryzhov, specifically put the word sale in quotation marks. The Swedes “sold” Ingria, Karelia, Estland and Livonia to Russia for 2 million thalers.[b][/b] The treatise makes no specific mention of the redemption of these lands. A treatise on eternal peace, 10 pages and 24 articles devoted to the settlement of all kinds of issues, precisely in order to disperse peacefully and with dignity, and not leave any misunderstandings as pretexts for future wars. Although we know that this eternal peace did not last long. The issues are very different - border demarcation, legitimization of ownership rights to land and property, transition to Russian citizenship, ways to settle debt obligations on previously issued bills. A very good document, an interesting read.
        Payments are included in a separate “Separate Article”. This is actually a description of the terms of payment and the payment schedule (4 payments of 500 efimks until September 000). By the way, the transfer of funds was planned in one of three European financial centers - Hamburg, Amsterdam or London. Apparently, this division was dictated by the fact that the execution of the Treaty began from the moment of ratification and it was of unlimited duration, and the article was considered completed upon payment in 1724.
        By the way, the Nystad Treaty is similar in spirit to the surrender agreements of, for example, Riga. Yes, we won, but the enemy must accept defeat with dignity (in terms of relations with Charles’s army), and we plan to establish fair relations with the city authorities and the local nobility. Without prejudice from a property and legal point of view. Therefore, the words of the Balts about “enslavement” are a lie from beginning to end. Urban inhabitants and the nobility had options - to leave for Sweden and take their property within a year, to remain a foreign citizen, or to become a subject of the Russian Tsar. The legal system and laws remained local. The collective feudal lord - the city - changed the overlord and signed a new vassal agreement
  4. -2
    6 November 2023 06: 52
    The story was announced as if it was about Lassi, but in fact it is a description of the course of the Northern War.
    The author casually mentioned the very important battle of Lesnaya, which Peter himself called “the mother of the Poltava victory.”
    1. +2
      6 November 2023 08: 15
      In fairness, I would like to note that the author wrote about the battle at Lesnaya in the first article of this series.
      1. +1
        6 November 2023 11: 04
        Hello Anton!
        If you think this is enough:
        “However, as you know, on September 28, 1708, Levengaupt’s corps was defeated at Lesnaya (currently this village is located on the territory of the Mogilev region).”
        Well, then probably.
        1. +1
          6 November 2023 11: 49
          Hi Sasha!
          But we’re talking about Lassi, not Menshikov...
          1. +1
            6 November 2023 12: 13
            By your logic - where Lassi did not participate, there is no need to mention it?
            Such a mosaic))))
          2. 0
            6 November 2023 12: 46
            If you write the truth, you will be downvoted))). Spread propaganda and you're in the black!
            Only real “historians” do this.
            Then I'll add more.
            Lassi was not captured during the battle of Narva (1700). He miraculously finds himself on the right bank of the Narova, and this is only possible if he fled with others across the Kamperholm Bridge during the battle. The disorderly flight destroyed this bridge.
            Yes, the first battle for Russia was unsuccessful.
            But I corrected myself, well done!
            When the army strengthened and began to win, Lassi’s career suffered.
  5. +6
    6 November 2023 08: 12
    And I liked it.
    **************************
  6. +1
    6 November 2023 09: 33
    I somehow didn’t know that the Russians were acting so successfully right near Stockholm at that time - apparently, I turned a deaf ear at the time. And it’s interesting about Copenhagen.
  7. +1
    6 November 2023 09: 34
    By the way, it was precisely in Copenhagen, where Peter 1 quarreled with the Danes and the British, that Tsarevich Alexei was supposed to come? But instead he asked for political asylum in Austria.
  8. +3
    6 November 2023 11: 44
    “In honor of these victories, the Panteleimon Church was built in St. Petersburg in 1735.”
    The temple in the name of the holy great martyr and healer Panteleimon is one of the oldest churches in St. Petersburg. Initially, in 1718, a wooden chapel was founded (for the workers of the Particular Shipyard) in honor of the victory of the Russian fleet over the Swedes, won on July 27, 1714. Since on this day they commemorate the Holy Healer Panteleimon - the “all-merciful”. Later, a wooden church was built, and in 1734, by order of Empress Anna Ioanovna, a stone church with a bell tower was built. Architect – I.K. Korobov. Subsequently rebuilt several times.
  9. +3
    6 November 2023 13: 51
    Author! Bravo! It would be interesting to read newspapers of that time about the defeats at Narva and the Prut campaign and, in particular, about the behavior of Peter the Great. Or what our “fleachers” would write about this if these events happened in our time. The head of state fled shamefully, the head of state was in panic. And in the end, a great statesman.
  10. +1
    7 November 2023 17: 15
    However, Peter Lassi remained in the Russian service, was promoted, and in the same 1711 he married Martha Philippine von Funcken (widow of the Swedish Count Hans Christopher Fröhlich), who bore him 9 children - 4 sons and 5 daughters. One of Lassi's sons, Franz Maurice, became an Austrian imperial marshal.

    I read about Lassi’s family on Wikipedia, it says that all of his daughters married Russian foreigners. Is it because of faith?
    1. VLR
      +2
      8 November 2023 11: 22
      Most likely, plus upbringing in a close tradition, a close mentality.
  11. 0
    1 February 2024 11: 33
    I wonder what commentators and journalists would write now if something similar to the defeat as a result of the Prut campaign happened today? About Petya Naryshkin, the Great...
  12. 0
    23 March 2024 21: 13
    He served excellently and now I would like to introduce the Marines of the Baltic Fleet in the vicinity of Stekolna.