The death penalty was alien to the legal worldview of the Russian people

95
The death penalty was alien to the legal worldview of the Russian people
Execution of conspirators in Russia. V.V. Vereshchagin



Blood feud and God's judgment


In Ancient Rus' there was no death penalty, but there was an ancient custom of blood feud, which was expressed in the principle “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.” The community had to punish the criminal. At that time, not punishing the criminal, not restoring justice, not taking revenge was considered a shame, dishonor for the victim, his family and clan. Execution could be replaced by exile, which was a very severe punishment; the “outcast” was not protected by clan or tribe, and in fact had no rights.



Used in Rus', etc. God's judgment. When all ordinary means were exhausted, the parties could appeal from the human court to the divine court. The forms of such a trial were different: lots were practiced, rota (oath, oath), ordeals (tests through fire and water) and judicial combat. Murder suits primarily used the fire and water test.

The test by fire consisted of holding one's hand on fire while crossing a lit fire in one shirt, and holding a hot iron with one's hands. The water test was carried out with either boiling or cold water. When testing with boiling water, a ring was placed at the bottom of a vessel with boiling water, which the accused had to remove without harm to himself. When testing with cold water, the accused, tied with a rope, was thrown into the water, and if he sank to the bottom, he was considered innocent, but if he remained on the surface of the water, he was found guilty. This test is explained by pagan views of water as a pure element that does not accept anything unclean.


"God's Judgment" Author: Ivan Goryushkin-Sorokopudov. 1910s

From Russian Pravda to Code of Laws of Ivan the Terrible


With the development of state institutions, repressive functions are gradually transferred to a special state apparatus. The death penalty becomes public and receives the status of a criminal punishment executed on behalf of the state.

Sources report attempts by Greek bishops to introduce the death penalty for robbery in Rus'. Individual cases of the use of this measure are known, but as a general practice the death penalty did not take root at that time. Russian Truth (a collection of legal norms of Rus' under Prince Yaroslav the Wise) did not provide for the death penalty. They were punished with a vira (monetary fine), the highest measure, including for murder in robbery, was “flow and plunder” - confiscation of property and extradition of the criminal (along with his family) “by the head”, that is, into slavery.

But traces of traditional law were also preserved in Russian Pravda - blood feud was preserved, but the circle of possible avengers was limited.

“If a husband kills his husband, then he will take revenge on his brother’s brother, or on his father’s son, or on his son’s father, or on his brother’s brother, or on his son’s sister; If someone doesn’t take revenge, then 40 hryvnia for your head.”

The final abolition of blood feud already occurred in the edition of the Russian Pravda under the sons of Yaroslav (“The Truth of the Yaroslavichs” by Izyaslav, Svyatoslav, Vsevolod, from 1072). Blood feud was finally replaced by a monetary fine. The death penalty in Rus' was henceforth applied only for exceptional crimes, during extraordinary events - for treason, rebellion, crimes against the Church.

The historian of Russian law N.P. Zagoskin noted that the death penalty was alien

“to the legal worldview of the Russian people, how alien to them is a harsh attitude towards a criminal in general.”

Grand Duke Vladimir Monomakh (creator of the “Charter”) also said:

“Do not kill and do not order to kill, even if someone is responsible for someone’s death.”

The most cruel and severe measures came to us from Western Europe after the adoption of Christianity. Only after the adoption of Christianity by the supreme power and its gradual spread to the population (the process was not instantaneous and bloodless and took more than one century), after long recommendations and pressure from Christian hierarchs, the Russian state adopted the Roman system of punishments (including the murder of a criminal). Subsequently, the institution of the death penalty in Rus' began to expand.

For the first time, the death penalty was legally enshrined in the Charter of Dvina in 1397. It was allowed to be used against malicious repeat offenders - for theft committed for the third time. The Pskov Judgment Charter of 1467 further expanded the list of crimes for which the death penalty was imposed. Capital punishment began to be applied for high treason (“perevet”), theft in the church, theft of church property, horse theft, arson (a terrible crime in conditions when most of the buildings in the settlement were wooden), theft committed in the settlement for the third time, robbery.

The trend towards expanding the use of the death penalty was continued in the Code of Laws of 1497. This set of laws of the Russian state provided for the death penalty for: treason, other state crimes, religious crimes (in particular, sacrilege), slander, for the murder of one’s master and other types of murder, robbery and repeated theft.

According to the Code of Law of 1550, people were executed for the first theft and repeated fraud. They could have been executed for almost any “daring deed.” At the same time, it should be noted that in peacetime the crime rate in Rus' was low. Thus, during the entire long reign of Ivan IV the Terrible, according to historians, about 4 thousand people were executed. At the same time, in the West, and then in Russia, the myth of “bloody Grozny” was created (Who created the “black” myth about the “bloody tyrant” Ivan the Terrible; How Grozny was turned into "the most terrible Russian tyrant").

In medieval England, France, Spain and other countries of Western Europe, executions were carried out much more often and for more minor sins. And during extraordinary events, riots, uprisings, etc., they were massacred, in the thousands, tens of thousands.


"Reading the Russian Truth to the people in the presence of Grand Duke Yaroslav." A. Kivshenko

First Romanovs


In the 1649th century, the death penalty began to be applied to tobacco smokers. A new step to expand punitive measures was taken in the Council Code of 54. The death penalty became the main type of criminal punishment, which punished from 60 to XNUMX crimes. Various types of death penalties were also approved: simple - hanging, and qualified - beheading, quartering, burning (for religious matters and in relation to arsonists), as well as pouring hot metal down the throat for counterfeiting.

The decree of 1653 changed the laws that had been in force since the time of Tsar Ivan Vasilyevich (Code of Code of 1550 and additional decrees), and according to the Council Code of 1649.

All robbers and thieves awaiting death penalty were released from it, they were ordered to “give belly" Capital punishment was replaced by punishment with a whip, cutting off a finger of the left hand and exile to Volga, Ukrainian cities or Siberia. The death penalty remained in force only for repeat offenders.

However, this decree did not last long. Soon the punishment was tightened again. Already in 1659, a decree was issued that reinstated hanging for robbers detained in the lower cities (Middle and Lower Volga region). In 1663, a decree was issued in Russia, which established that robbers and thieves, “who will face the death penalty", it is necessary to cut off both legs and left arms.

Russian empire


The use of the death penalty reached its peak under Tsar Peter I. During the investigation of the Streletsky riot of 1698 alone, about 2 thousand people were executed. The military regulations of 1716 impose the death penalty in 122 cases. But in most cases, the death penalty was replaced with other punishments.

After the era of Peter the punitive wave began to decline, and various attempts at reform began with the goal of abolishing or limiting the death penalty. As a result, under Elizaveta Petrovna, a radical change is taking place in this area. In 1744, the empress issued an order that suspended the execution of death sentences. By a decree of 1754, the “natural death penalty” was replaced by “political” death and exile to hard labor in Siberia. Previously, the criminal was subjected to corporal punishment - beaten with a whip, his nostrils were pulled out, or he was branded. All cases in which the death penalty could be applied were subject to transfer to the Senate and were considered by the empress herself.

This order was preserved under subsequent sovereigns. An exception was made only during the suppression of riots, insurrections, when military courts operated, and due to individual cases of grave crimes and special state circumstances. For example, exceptions were in 1771 - the execution of the murderers of Archbishop Ambrose, in 1775 - the uprising of Emelyan Pugachev and his associates (Russian riot), in 1826 – the cause of the Decembrists.

In general, the Russian tsars were quite humane people in comparison with Western rulers. Death sentences were already handed down quite rarely; for example, during the reign of Alexander I, 84 people were executed.

Suspended by the decrees of Empress Elizabeth Petrovna, the death penalty was restored by legislative acts of the 1812th century: the Field Code of 20, the law of October 1832, 1832 on quarantine crimes and the Code of Laws of the Russian Empire of XNUMX.

The Code of Laws established the death penalty for: 1) serious types of political crimes, but only if the perpetrators were brought before the Supreme Criminal Court; 2) some quarantine crimes (that is, crimes that were committed during epidemics and were associated with violence against quarantine guards or quarantine institutions); 3) military crimes. The use of the death penalty is limited to these same types according to the Penal Code of 1845 (provided for the approval of the sentence only after its highest consideration). Usually, under extenuating circumstances, the death penalty was replaced by indefinite hard labor or hard labor for a period of 15-20 years.

According to the laws of the Russian Empire of the late 1th century, in addition to military and quarantine crimes, people who committed the most important state crimes were also subject to the death penalty: 2) malicious intent on the supreme rights, life, health, honor and freedom of the sovereign and members of the imperial family; 3) rebellion and XNUMX) serious types of treason.

The law of April 17, 1863 allows in some cases the death penalty for murder, robbery, assault weapons on defenseless people, arson and violence against a woman. The provision on enhanced security 4 September 1881 of the year transferred to the jurisdiction of the military court for condemnation under the laws of wartime cases of armed resistance to the authorities and attack on officials, if these crimes were aggravated by murder, attempted murder, infliction of wounds, injuries, severe beatings, arson . The main types of death penalty were shooting and hanging.

There were also special cases. Thus, since 1893, it was allowed to apply the death penalty to military courts for the murder of railway employees and train passengers who committed “natives in the Caucasus region and Stavropol province" However, in general, the use of the death penalty in the XNUMXth century was rare, an exception.

The situation changed with the growing wave of revolutionary terror at the beginning of the 1905th century. To bring down the revolutionary wave of 1907-XNUMX, military courts began to operate throughout the country, executing not only professional revolutionaries, but also looters and other “troublemakers” (it was then that the expression “Stolypin tie” appeared). The death penalty could be applied by decision of the governors.

On June 19, 1906, during a meeting of the First State Duma, a draft law on the abolition of the death penalty in Russia was discussed. All cases of the death penalty were planned to be replaced directly with the next most severe punishment. But the bill was not supported by the State Council. The same bill on the abolition of the death penalty was raised and approved by the Second State Duma, but the State Council again did not support it.

At the beginning of the XNUMXth century, the Russian public, prominent criminologists and scientists more than once raised the issue of the complete abolition of the death penalty.
95 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +16
    30 October 2023 04: 25
    I read modern criminal chronicles and am silently horrified.
    I am definitely in favor of the death penalty for sadists, maniacs, child killers, and incorrigible repeat offenders.
    Our modern justice has greatly degraded in terms of fair punishment for crimes committed.
    A plus sign is given to criminals...a minus sign is given to those who are trying to resist crime.
    If this continues, our society will inevitably disintegrate and rot like a body or plant incapable of living.
    I don’t understand the message of the author of the article... what Is he for the death penalty for criminals or against it? It’s weird, though.
    1. +12
      30 October 2023 05: 28
      I also got the impression that the author wrote and wrote and then gave up.
      1. +10
        30 October 2023 05: 52
        There is a feeling that there was an “arc... noah”: “a God-loving, holy people”, “good rulers who looked upon their people as the lambs of God”, “princes, kings and other rulers” who rode in their kindness on pink ponies across the rainbow, scattering pink petals and nourishing their people with the right hand of the sovereign".... And all the tyrants and murderers were there - in the “damned west”, which has been walking under the devil since time immemorial. And with us - Holy Russia. Yes. And these are all writers - classics who wrote about how landowners beat their slaves to death, how soldiers were whipped to death with spitzrutens, about how executioners broke their spines with batogs, how Novgorodians were lowered under the ice and someone cut off the heads of the archers himself, and about how they shot in the back of the head " enemies of the people" and Zemlyachka drowned officers in barges and so on and so forth - these are all the machinations of the "West", a slander against honest people, true patriots of the country, a pure lie. Yes.
        1. +4
          30 October 2023 13: 31
          It’s unlikely that they were drowned in barges. A little expensive. It’s easier to tie your hands and go overboard. Can be in a bag with a stone.
          1. +2
            30 October 2023 14: 26
            The barges are reusable. Picked it up and unloaded it. French invention.
        2. 0
          31 October 2023 09: 10
          Quote: Monster_Fat
          And here we have Holy Rus'. Yes. And all these classic writers who wrote about how landowners beat their slaves to death, how soldiers were also flogged to death with spitzrutens, about how executioners broke their spines with batogs, how they lowered Novgorodians under the ice and someone cut off the heads of archers himself, and about how they shot “enemies of the people” in the back of the head and Zemlyachka drowned officers in barges and so on and so forth - these are all the machinations of the “West”, a slander against honest people, true patriots of the country, a pure lie. Yes.


          You seem to have mixed the Russian Empire, Ancient Rus', and the Bolsheviks into one ball. Everyone knows what happened to Saltychikha for her atrocities. Everyone also knows the attitude of citizens towards Ivan the Terrible. The compatriot has nothing to do with the Russian Empire.
    2. +3
      30 October 2023 18: 14
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      I don’t understand the message of the author of the article... is he for or against the death penalty for criminals? It’s weird, though.

      Is the option that the author simply gives a historical excursion not considered in principle?
    3. +2
      1 November 2023 21: 00
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      I am definitely in favor of the death penalty for sadists, maniacs, child killers, and incorrigible repeat offenders.

      You decide
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      Our modern justice has greatly degraded in terms of fair punishment for crimes committed.
      A plus sign is given to criminals...a minus sign is given to those who are trying to resist crime.

      If you are for execution, then you cannot argue for “bad justice,” and vice versa.
      If justice is bad and death is introduced, then there will be a mountain the innocent corpses.
      You yourself understand this perfectly well
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      A plus sign is given to criminals...a minus sign is given to those who are trying to resist crime.

      Therefore, either if the justice is bad - then life, but if you desperately need a tower, then there should be justice perfect.
      В non-corrupt The USSR slapped an innocent man for Chikatilo's affairs.
      In the 1930s, an article for torture had to be introduced in the Criminal Code of 1926
      If there is an interest, making you a pedophile/maniac/terrorist/incorrigible recidivist has always been a matter of a couple of days.
      "And I am the chapel too? (c)
  2. +12
    30 October 2023 04: 35
    Lately they have started making some kind of tolerants out of Russian society... It’s time to understand that turning the other cheek doesn’t work. If you have committed an evil, be kind enough to atone for your guilt, and don’t sit on the necks of taxpayers, grinning about how good it is to do nothing. The death penalty is necessary, otherwise people are openly laughing at our laws, and this is the fault of the legislators themselves, and everyone who thinks that the law is not for everyone. But capital punishment can be introduced only when the law is fairly observed, but now the laws only apply against ordinary people, and all sorts of thieves even avoid fines, let alone prison.....
    1. 0
      23 March 2024 13: 32
      This is certainly a very serious topic. In the event that the death penalty is applied in Russia, it should not definitely take place without torture - which should definitely lead to death, but if measures are taken against any religious fanatics, it is necessary, in addition to the death penalty, to take measures also against those religious dogmas, which in fact bring both oblivion and a curse of the family for the villain! Those atrocities that will be committed should not be considered a feat for the sake of the people and faith, and the villains themselves should not be revered in their family and their people, nor should they lead to their repetition!
      Example: a Muslim believer does not eat pork, well, there are also some other restrictions on his behavior that must be turned to his detriment! That is, lead the villain to the religious death of his soul, etc., etc., which should become a tough barrier for each of them to decide to commit evil. Naturally, this should be accepted, or consultation on this issue should be given - according to the type of punishment, not people of a different faith, but precisely people of the same faith as the villain, so that this does not lead to religious confrontation!
      1. 0
        April 13 2024 19: 48
        Among Muslims, hanging is considered shameful, because the soul leaves the body not as it is supposed to, but through the butt... and becomes defiled, and despite all the merits, such a Muslim does not go to heaven..
        About the same will happen to a Muslim who is killed by dogs.... For a dog is an unclean animal
        And all this sewing into a pig's skin.... There is no such thing in the Koran
  3. +8
    30 October 2023 04: 35
    At the beginning of the XNUMXth century, the Russian public, prominent criminologists and scientists more than once raised the issue of the complete abolition of the death penalty.

    Look, how philanthropic they are, you just want to cry. It's good to be a liberal before grief comes to your home..
    It seems that any adequate representative of the public, any sane criminologist and scientist would have sung differently if his wife had been raped and killed. Or they robbed and killed his son or daughter.

    In practice, humanism eventually transforms into perversion. To support the thesis, here are a couple of recent examples from Ukraine. A woman was jailed for five years and two months for stealing three kilograms of lard from a drunk man sleeping on a bench.
    And he faces five years for the driver who killed a girl at full speed at a pedestrian crossing. Although in reality she should have been given a fine (with compensation for damages), and the driver (including aggravating factors) should have been given the thumbs down. But Ukraine is striving for a humane Europe, where not only rape, but also murder is almost decriminalized.
    1. +11
      30 October 2023 05: 19
      Quote: Comrade
      It's good to be a liberal before grief comes to your home

      You can’t say it more precisely! Just note that the Bible also spoke about the death penalty for murder, rape and something else...
    2. -2
      30 October 2023 05: 37
      Although in reality she should have been given a fine (with damages),

      Does the murdered girl also get a fine?
      1. +4
        30 October 2023 18: 18
        Quote: Andrey Moskvin
        Does the murdered girl also get a fine?

        Not the murdered one, but the one who stole the lard
    3. +4
      30 October 2023 15: 15
      Quote: Comrade
      It's good to be a liberal before grief comes to your home..

      Bernard-Henri Levy is an example of this. The man supported, inspired and justified all anti-state protests around the world, presenting their participants as fighters for freedom and democracy.
      But as soon as the demonstrations began in France, the freedom fighters immediately turned into enemies of the Republic, fascists and anti-Semites, and the fighter against tyranny began to call for unification around the legitimate government. smile
      Whether Macron speaks or not, whether we agree with him or not, whether we stand for his reforms or against them - it doesn’t matter now. Faced with the enemies of the Republic, there is only one way out: support President Macron!
    4. +2
      30 October 2023 18: 18
      Quote: Comrade
      A woman was jailed for five years and two months for stealing three kilograms of lard from a drunk man sleeping on a bench.

      I encroached on something sacred!
      1. +1
        31 October 2023 11: 54
        Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
        I encroached on something sacred!

        To the sacred symbol of the nation! smile
  4. +3
    30 October 2023 05: 24
    First of all, thanks to the author for his efforts.
    Secondly, it is necessary to solve problems of ethics and humanity in matters of application of the death penalty, referring to the Russian people, based on the fact that in Rus' from ancient times they preferred death to shame.
    But, over time, there were people for whom the “yellow water” that got into their eyes was God’s dew. And guided by the principle: “one time is not a pederast,” they reduced any shame against their loved ones to an ordinary oversight.
    * * *
    The purpose of any punishment is to prevent new crimes in the future. Shedding blood with or without reason is unforgivable. But there are crimes when the human essence can no longer be beaten with rods. By the way, public flogging could eradicate some crimes. I'm not suggesting cutting off the thieves' hand. There are many ways to wean oneself from this habit by atonement for sins through hard physical labor.
    But there are types of crimes for which the punishment should be execution. These are those atrocities whose purpose was the desire to kill or mock. There are no conditions for correction for those who committed murder for the purpose of JUST KILLING... There should be no pity for those involved in the drug business.
    * * *
    Why do they say: “I’ll shoot you like a mad dog!” Yes, because there are no other methods of correction (treatment) for this.
    * * *
    It would be a good idea to exclude some officials (even those who establish by law their comfortable maintenance and provide ordinary citizens with the right to poverty) from activities in government structures. Excessively greedy people cannot do good deeds.
    The moratorium on the death penalty for criminal and economic crimes was introduced by those who had no intention of reforming, ensuring themselves relative immunity and complete impunity thanks to their status or big money.
    * * *
    Particular attention must be paid to the use of exceptional measures in conditions of war (yesterday even the Supreme Commander said it - war). There should be no mercy for the enemy who came to your house to kill, guided by Nazi rules.
    The main concern of the state is ensuring the safety of its citizens!!!
    1. 0
      31 October 2023 11: 52
      Quote: ROSS 42
      The purpose of any punishment is to prevent new crimes in the future.

      Brad. Who came up with this? Punishment can never prevent anything in the future. Punishment in itself is sufficient. The purpose of punishment is punishment itself, according to the principle “Evil must be punished.” The only question is whether the punishment corresponds to the gravity of the crime or misdemeanor. The principle of punishing crime is valuable in itself. And the death penalty has always been, is and will be a natural part of the people's legal consciousness as an expression of the instinct of self-preservation of society.
  5. +5
    30 October 2023 05: 51
    Stalin abolished the tower in 1947, and Bandera members and other Nazi collaborators began to be imprisoned for 25 years. And before that they were hanged. Alas, even great people make mistakes, and if they do, they are great ones. Maybe he figured that hardly anyone would survive 25 in the Gulag, so let them bring at least some benefit to the country while they were alive. Even in his worst nightmare, he could not have dreamed that Khrushch would give them all an indiscriminate amnesty, and Shcherbitsky would drag them into the nomenklatura.
    This is how the half-baked Banderaites and their descendants made their way to power. Now we have to denazify...
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  6. +1
    30 October 2023 05: 59
    And yet... we have not adopted the manner of making an act of retribution, a public show, entertainment... and so, keeping hardened, dangerous criminals for life is a so-so idea, not justified.
    1. +2
      30 October 2023 06: 24
      Quote: rocket757
      keeping hardened, dangerous criminals for life is a so-so idea, not justified

      And expensive!
    2. -1
      30 October 2023 06: 25
      Well, yes, it “didn’t catch on.” Enough of these “slogans and chants” about the chosen people, supposedly not like those in the “West”: kind, God-fearing, not wishing harm to others, rejecting cruelty, living in truth, etc. Just read this:
      1. +1
        30 October 2023 09: 29
        Question... does national cinema and literature reflect the essence of the processes taking place in society or shape it???
        For the especially enlightened/spiritualized, clarification... no one has such a level of bloodthirstiness, violence, and other perversions, except for those who are “exceptional”... but not the essence, we practically don’t have this.
        As always, everything is learned by comparison.
        By the way... about the chosen ones, this is somehow in a completely different direction.... for us it’s enough to remain just normal people. Your own path, your own goals and objectives... that's normal.
      2. +7
        30 October 2023 18: 22
        Quote: Monster_Fat
        Just read this:

        Shirokorad?!!!
        I don’t know how you can argue your point of view WORSE than by referring to Shirokorada.
  7. +4
    30 October 2023 06: 19
    It is always a pleasure to rejoice for the “humane-loving holy people”.

    But the decisions of the kings should not be confused with the will of the people. In addition, “giving it away” is an even more terrible thing than cutting off one’s head. Here the life of an entire family was cut to the ground.

    In the 19th century there lived a famous lawyer V.D. Spasovich, who knew how to see the main thing: “We cannot have a full-fledged jury trial, because society does not understand that a crime is a violation of the law.” Deep!!

    Many people to this day live according to the “Russian Truth” of the 12th century, when it was considered a crime to cause offense... For example, Chekhov’s peasant from the story “The Intruder” could not understand that unscrewing the nuts on railway tracks is a crime.
    A Russian worker or collective farmer in the USSR also had a strange understanding: “bring every nail from the factory...” or “everything around is collective farm...”....

    When Yeltsin and his comrades divided the USSR at night under a bush in Belovezhskaya Pushcha, the people did not even in the slightest understand that this was a crime: “yes, yes, they didn’t offend anyone!”.... .

    And even few people remember the resolution of the State Duma in March 1996 on this matter.
    Well, people didn’t understand that a criminal must not nominate for president.! ... laughing
    1. 0
      31 October 2023 15: 32
      For example, Chekhov's peasant from the story "The Intruder" could not understand that unscrewing the nuts on railway tracks is a crime.

      I don’t want to say anything, but in this case he had some reasons (erroneous, of course) to believe so - the whole village had been unscrewing these nuts for years. With the connivance of the authorities. And, I suspect, not only this village. Let me note that from Chekhov’s text it is clear that not only the dark peasants knew that the screws were being tightened, but also the “gentlemen” and took advantage of it.
      Denis grins and narrows his eyes at the investigator in disbelief.
      - Well! For how many years the whole village has been unscrewing the nuts and God preserved them, and then there was a crash... people were killed... If I had taken away the rail or, let’s say, put a log across the track, well, then, perhaps, the train would have deflected, otherwise. ..ugh! screw!
      - But understand, the rails are attached to the sleepers with nuts!
      - We understand this... We don’t unscrew everything... we leave it... We don’t do it crazy... we understand...
      — When they searched your place, they found another nut... Where did you unscrew this one and when?
      “I didn’t unscrew it, Ignashka, the crooked son of Semyon, gave it to me.” I’m talking about the one under the chest, and the one in the sleigh in the yard, Mitrofan and I unscrewed.
      - With which Mitrofan?
      - With Mitrofan Petrov... Have you heard anything? He makes nets here and sells them to gentlemen. He needs a lot of these same nuts. For each seine, there are about ten...
  8. +1
    30 October 2023 06: 57
    It's the other way around. The death penalty was precisely what helped the Russians, who were building a great empire, to protect themselves from traitors who argued that why have an empire, the Germans, French or Turks may not like it, that it is easier to lie under them than to build a great empire themselves, not to please them “civilized”, who, however, tore off the heads of their traitors like heads of cabbage. True, for this there should have been an organ in Russia that tracked the traitors in a timely manner. Under Nicholas II and Brezhnev, this body worked poorly and the liberals and Gorbachev got into power, whose heads were not cut off because of such an oversight..
    1. -1
      30 October 2023 08: 15
      Quote: north 2
      True, for this there should have been a body in Russia that tracked traitors in a timely manner. But under Nicholas II and under Brezhnev, this body worked poorly

      Question: did it work well under Stalin?
      1. +1
        30 October 2023 08: 32
        Quote: kalibr
        Quote: north 2
        True, for this there should have been a body in Russia that tracked traitors in a timely manner. But under Nicholas II and under Brezhnev, this body worked poorly

        Question: did it work well under Stalin?

        I believe that the assessment of the comparison of a political leader (tsar, emperor, general secretary, president...) should be based on what he did not in relation to the current time (ruler, events), but in relation to previous rulers, events.
        1. -1
          30 October 2023 09: 46
          Quote: Terenin
          I believe that the assessment of the comparison of a political leader (tsar, emperor, general secretary, president...) should be based on what he did not in relation to the current time (ruler, events), but in relation to previous rulers, events.

          Why so many words? Especially off topic. This is not about assessing the manager. Only "organ". Therefore, you can answer more simply - “yes” - “no”.
      2. +3
        30 October 2023 10: 56
        Quote: kalibr
        Question: did it work well under Stalin?

        If we take into account, the fate of the leaders of this body obviously does not. request
        Well, or at least not always.
        1. 0
          30 October 2023 15: 45
          Quote: Senior Sailor
          If we take into account, the fate of the leaders of this body obviously does not.
          Well, or at least not always.

          That is, this organ has worked poorly for us... always!
          1. 0
            31 October 2023 06: 01
            An organ cannot exist on its own. If opposition forces (including traitors) are growing in the state, then any government agencies cannot be guaranteed to be protected from the penetration of these forces. This is not a question of the structure of the state, but a technical problem.
  9. +5
    30 October 2023 07: 13
    The entire text of the original source did not fit into the article format. smile
  10. +8
    30 October 2023 07: 30
    Law is a system that is strictly connected with the formational system of society. What are the Russian people like in the XNUMXth - XNUMXth centuries?
    Everything is strictly linked to the formation or pre-state period, like the Russian Truth - a document of customary law! This has already been written and rewritten. The document is no different from all the barbaric truths of the XNUMXth-XNUMXth centuries. or the laws of Gulltaring, Frostatig, etc.
    Feudalism was established - the Council Code of 1648 appeared, which existed, partly formally, until the 30s. XIX century!
    It turns out that the death penalty was “disgusting” to the Russian people, the people, if anything, in the terminology of the 30th - XNUMXs of the XNUMXth centuries. - these are only peasants, nobles are not people, but serfdom is acceptable to the peasant people.
    1. +5
      30 October 2023 07: 48
      hi Edward, good morning! Wonderful comment. But you see that this is a “piece” taken from someone.. smile Don't surprise readers with formations smile
      1. +2
        30 October 2023 08: 57
        Alexey good morning!!!
        Don't surprise readers with formations

        I won’t... although everyone studied at school, they didn’t pass by it laughing
  11. +3
    30 October 2023 08: 01
    “Salicheskaya Pravda”, “Ripuarskaya Pravda” of the Franks also did not know the death penalty... Were the Franks Slavs?
    1. +2
      30 October 2023 08: 59
      Were the Franks Slavs?

      From ours, from the Poles, from the Slavs.\
      Good morning!
      And those who wrote Lombard, Visigothic and other truths too laughing
      1. +1
        30 October 2023 09: 53
        Quote: Eduard Vaschenko
        Good morning!

        Good morning, Edward! You calmed me down...
    2. +1
      30 October 2023 09: 02
      Quote: kalibr
      "Salic truth", "Ripuarian truth" of the Franks also did not know the death penalty

      All the barbaric ones you mentioned Of Truth didn't know this, but besides Of Truth, the Franks, still at the pre-state level, had their own laws and traditions, dating back to the pre-Roman era of barbarism. For example, cutting off the limbs of a murderer or rapist and throwing him out for everyone to see. And this is none True didn't prohibit...
      1. 0
        30 October 2023 09: 51
        Quote: Luminman
        For example, cutting off the limbs of a murderer or rapist and throwing him out for everyone to see. And no Truth forbade this...

        Didn't know this. Where else can you read about this?
        1. +1
          30 October 2023 10: 40
          Quote: kalibr
          Didn't know this

          There is nothing surprising...

          Quote: kalibr
          Where else can you read about this?

          Lex Salica
          - If anyone finds at a crossroads a man without arms and without legs, abandoned there by his enemies, and finishes him off and is caught, he will be sentenced to pay 4000 deniers, which is 100 sol.
          - If anyone dares to remove a person from the gallows without the consent of the judge, he is awarded 45 sol.
          - If anyone dares to remove the head of a man, which his enemy has impaled, without the permission of the judge or the one who impaled it, he is sentenced to pay 15 sols.
          Etc.
          1. +2
            30 October 2023 15: 48
            Quote: Luminman
            abandoned there by his enemies, and will finish him off,

            And on the basis of this you are talking about the presence of execution in “truth”?
            Quote: Luminman
            If anyone dares to remove the head of a man, which his enemy has impaled, without the permission of the judge or the one who impaled it, he is sentenced to pay 15 sols.

            But from this point it is not clear whether the head was planted by law or by “right”. And the judge is only an arbiter.
            So these examples didn't convince me. We need a clause - “hanging for murder.” And again, we are not talking about pre-Roman times. And about the period after the baptism of the Franks.
            1. +1
              30 October 2023 16: 17
              Quote: kalibr
              But from this paragraph it is not clear whether the head was planted by law or by “right”

              Head impaled by concepts, like a discarded body with severed limbs. Salic truth does not prohibit this. It prohibits assistance...

              Quote: kalibr
              And again, we are not talking about pre-Roman times. And about the period after the baptism of the Franks

              Salic truth - this is the period after baptism. The earliest
              A similar thing happened after baptism, because traditions are ineradicable. We still have laws and concepts and, unfortunately, concepts are more enforceable than laws. And this is not only here, in Russia...
              1. +1
                30 October 2023 19: 18
                Quote: Luminman
                Salic truth does not prohibit this. It prohibits assistance...

                This is what I wanted to find out. That is, there is nothing about executions there. All. that murderous events take place outside the legal framework. However, I have the text, I’ll have to look at everything for myself.
      2. +1
        30 October 2023 09: 52
        Quote: Luminman
        All the barbaric ones you mentioned

        Really? When did the Franks get baptized?
        1. +2
          30 October 2023 10: 45

          Quote: kalibr
          When did the Franks get baptized?

          Even school textbooks wrote about this. Feel free to search for yourself...
          1. 0
            30 October 2023 15: 52
            I know about school textbooks. I am interested in the effect of the Salic law itself “after the adoption of Christianity.” That's exactly how the author does it. But there are 498 years between the baptism of the Franks and baptism.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  12. -3
    30 October 2023 08: 11
    The use of the death penalty reached its peak under Tsar Peter I.
    He chopped off heads and tortured people. This is how much it was necessary to humiliate your royal title... To step down from the throne in order to pick up an ax in public. And to the torture room... He was clearly a psycho, but he was also a sadist!
  13. +5
    30 October 2023 08: 18
    In general, the Russian tsars were quite humane people in comparison with Western rulers. Death sentences were already handed down quite rarely; for example, during the reign of Alexander I, 84 people were executed.
    Well, yes, under Nikolai Palkin it was completely abolished, just to drive it back and forth through the gauntlet, it’s such a trifle, sir. The article is intended, well, for a completely ignorant history, a leavened patriot. There are few of these in the history section, this should be posted somewhere in “Opinions”, it would go down there with a bang wassat
    1. +4
      30 October 2023 08: 36
      to drive you through the gauntlet here and there, it’s such a trifle, sir
      This is humane. Don’t hang around in a noose and don’t walk around without your head. laughing
      1. +3
        31 October 2023 02: 17
        It’s also humane to let a peasant, for example, be whipped. And if he died a couple of days later, then the then forensic investigation did not find a cause-and-effect relationship between the lawful punishment and death. Therefore, there could be few executions.
    2. +1
      1 November 2023 22: 57
      under Nikolai Palkin it was completely canceled


      A very common misconception.
      Many people really think that Nicholas I executed “only” 5 Decembrists.

      I'll list what I remember right away:
      - Zerentui conspiracy (an attempt to liberate the Decembrists) - 5 people were shot in 1828.
      - Sevastopol riot of 1830 - about a thousand received hard labor, about five hundred were punished with spitsrutens (from 500 to 3000 blows) and 7 people were shot.
      - Shimon Konarski - shot in Vilna in 1839.
      - Potocki, Kociszewski and Zharsky - hanged in 1846.
  14. -1
    30 October 2023 08: 32
    Quote: Andrey Moskvin
    I also got the impression that the author wrote and wrote and then gave up.

    Quantity has won over quality, perhaps the author will present the second part of this “deep historical research” to us someday...
  15. +3
    30 October 2023 08: 45
    In Ancient Rus' there was no death penalty, but there was an ancient custom of blood feud, which was expressed in the principle “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.” The community had to punish the criminal.

    The author copied some source without completely understanding the essence of the question, so the article looks like a story about mathematics, which was written by an individual who did not know the multiplication tables.
    I wonder if the author is able to explain the difference between blood feud and the death penalty?
    1. 0
      30 October 2023 08: 56
      Quote from Frettaskyrandi
      the author is able to explain the difference between blood feud and the death penalty

      The first is a folk tradition, the second has been elevated to the rank of law. However, this does not change the final result...
      1. 0
        30 October 2023 09: 31
        Question for the author’s worldview: is the high mortality rate during and after corporal punishment, and the high mortality rate in places of confinement and hard labor, is this not taken into account?
  16. 0
    30 October 2023 09: 38
    An interesting reproduction of a painting by V. Vereshchagin
    On the day of the execution of the People's Will, there was no snowfall in St. Petersburg, that is, Vereshchagin pushed the execution itself into the background, and used the snowfall as an artistic device.
    Vereshchagin was a famous fighter against the death penalty, including the execution of Narodnaya Volya members, but when painting this picture he could not resist all kinds of art.
  17. +1
    30 October 2023 10: 38
    When I look at our legislation, and most importantly at law enforcement practice, I get the impression that criminals have more rights than we, law-abiding citizens.
    The position “it is better to let 10 criminals go free than to convict one innocent person” is good when you are sitting in the “crystal tower”, you and your family are protected. But imagine the state of a crime victim when the criminal is acquitted.
    1. +3
      1 November 2023 21: 09
      Quote: Not the fighter
      The position “it is better to let 10 criminals go free than to convict one innocent person” is good when you are sitting in the “crystal tower”, you and your family are protected. But imagine the state of a crime victim when the criminal is acquitted.

      Well, of course, the state of relatives who received a piece of paper “Rehabilitated posthumously due to lack of corpus delicti” - they were immediately happy in the 1950s-60s-70s...
      The man shot for the crime instead of Chikatilo - apparently the hole in his skull immediately healed back?
  18. -1
    30 October 2023 11: 50
    Quote from turembo
    The death penalty is needed, otherwise people are openly laughing at our laws
    Sometimes they laugh, but most often they are horrified by their inconsistency with international law and basic common sense.

    For example, a person is driving along the road without wearing a seat belt. Then he receives SEVEN fines, since on his way he came across 7 cameras recording his offense.
    Those. For ONE ongoing offense, a person is punished SEVEN TIMES, as if he had committed seven offenses.
    Fine?

    And at best, he will be punished. But if the car is registered, for example, in the name of his wife, then they will punish NOT the OFFENDER, but the person not committing an offenseThat is, the innocent will be punished.

    I would conclude that the legislation of the Russian Federation has reached complete insanity.
    1. +1
      1 November 2023 21: 15
      Quote: Lewww
      But if the car is registered, for example, in his wife’s name, then they will punish NOT the OFFENDER, but the person who did not commit the offense, that is, they will punish the innocent.

      I would conclude that the legislation of the Russian Federation has reached complete insanity.

      Do you propose to let the car drive strictly with a change of registration? And change it back and forth every half hour?
      Your suggestions?
      That they will travel all on cars registered to a legless (to be safe!) mother-in-law - doesn’t it bother you???!!!!
  19. +2
    30 October 2023 12: 11
    Come on, Alexander! And Prince Oleg did not slaughter the prisoners? And Svyatoslav? And the Decembrists who were torn from the gallows were not hanged again? No? Source?
    1. 0
      30 October 2023 12: 29
      What am I talking about? My labor teacher - Ivan Vasilyevich Novozhzhenov - passed the entire Higher Military Education + Japanese
      Instead of labor lessons, he sometimes told us about the war. And it was right! This doesn’t mean that I can take the plane from the wrong side... (now I have a shitload of things to take on the hump and they can shoot forward). He said: “I captured an SS man. I want to shoot him, the bastard, right there, but I can’t. My conscience doesn’t allow it. I say: “Put your helmet on your head.” I'll shoot her three times from your own Parabellum. If I don’t kill you, go in all four directions.” And so it happened. The SS left. Either Kakka is good, or Parabellum is bad.
      1. +5
        30 October 2023 12: 34
        SS left. Either Kakka is good, or Parabellum is bad.
        The SS's brains would turn to mush. And my neck would curl. Articulatio atlantoaxialis such feints would definitely not be to your liking.
      2. +1
        30 October 2023 14: 01
        For some reason Uncle Kostya is not visible. He is a weapons expert.
        I can only comment based on Zhuk.
        Luger (9,19 mm) has high penetration power. It seems to me that a helmet is not protection against a direct shot.
        My husband said that German helmets were weak
      3. +1
        30 October 2023 17: 37
        SS left. Either the helmet is good, or Parabellum is bad.

        Either he's a bad shooter. laughing
        And most likely a lie. A 9 mm bullet fired from a Borchardt-Luger at a speed of 350-380 m/s freely pierced a German M35-40 helmet at a distance of 20 meters. And even more so from a much closer distance. I’m not talking about three shots.
        The Internet is full of videos of breaking through M35-40 helmets from various domestic and German pistols from WWII


        1. +1
          30 October 2023 17: 39
          For some reason Uncle Kostya is not visible. He is a weapons expert.

          Banned, Vera, Uncle Kostya, for three months. In his previous work, he had shot quite a few German helmets from various types of weapons, testing them for bulletproofness.
          My husband said that German helmets were weak

          According to Konstantin, Soviet SSh-40 helmets were 20% superior to German M-40 helmets in terms of protecting the wearer, although they were 1mm thinner. It's all about the steel material.
          1. 0
            30 October 2023 18: 00
            It's all about the steel material.

            For us it was steel 36SGN
      4. 0
        1 November 2023 21: 23
        Quote: Sergey_Vladimir
        SS left. Either Kakka is good, or Parabellum is bad.

        Lied your workman....
        I don’t know why, but I lied.
        In one of the death concentration camps, the Germans were testing lethality - they put several people in a line close together and shot the first person in the heart. 5 people were guaranteed to get through, 6-7 were sometimes lucky.
        After the war, the camp commander was caught by our people, tried and shot
        1. -1
          1 November 2023 21: 27
          Quote: your1970
          put several people in a line close together

          In the column.
  20. AB
    +2
    30 October 2023 13: 38
    ...as well as pouring hot metal down the throat for counterfeiting.


    This punishment is called - Flood your throat. I remember reading about this for the first time when my hair was standing out in horror. Although it is far from the most cruel punishment invented by human “genius”.
  21. +4
    30 October 2023 13: 49
    Author, you are slightly “lost” in time: “God’s judgment” is the Middle Ages, and you say: “after the adoption of Christianity.”
    I may be mistaken, but “the pre-Christian “period is 97%” Terra incognito.”
    The first chroniclers associated with monasteries, which means Christianity
  22. 0
    30 October 2023 15: 04
    The use of the death penalty reached its peak under Tsar Peter I. During the investigation of the Streletsky riot of 1698 alone, about 2 thousand people were executed.

    Hmmm.... how many were executed under Alexei Mikhailovich during the suppression of the uprising of Stepan Razin? On VO there was an article “The end of Stepan Razin’s Peasant War and the fate of the atamans,” where the number of those executed in just three months after the defeat of the uprising was estimated at 11 thousand people.
    The revenge of the authorities was truly terrible: for three months, royal punishers executed more than 11 thousand people. Others were beaten with whips; thousands of people had their tongues cut out or their hands chopped off.
    1. +3
      30 October 2023 15: 59
      And the “copper riot”, when they chopped for “copper tabu”, and “salt”... Or punishments for “schism”. “And those schismatics should be burned in the log hole...”
      1. +2
        30 October 2023 19: 13
        And the Lensky execution in 1912
        1. +1
          30 October 2023 21: 31
          You can also remember the Novocherkassk execution.
          1. -1
            31 October 2023 05: 45
            It’s better to open the Old Testament, Exodus chapter 32 and remember that Moses said: “take the sword and kill” - and thousands of Jews were killed in a day Because those who break the Law should be killed. Violation of the Law is a crime for which an entire nation is erased from the Book of Life. This is simply a fact from God.
        2. +1
          31 October 2023 09: 33
          Quote: agond
          And the Lensky execution in 1912


          As a result of the shareholder conflict, the strike and the shooting of a crowd of three thousand strikers by government troops, 170 people were killed and more than 200 were injured.

          We still remember!
    2. 0
      31 October 2023 10: 05
      Quote: Alexey RA
      Hmmm.... how many were executed under Alexei Mikhailovich during the suppression of the uprising of Stepan Razin? On VO there was an article “The end of Stepan Razin’s Peasant War and the fate of the atamans,” where the number of those executed in just three months after the defeat of the uprising was estimated at 11 thousand people.


      For comparison to understand the difference:

      In the London borough of Tyburn alone (a place of execution for commoners), an average of 560 people were executed annually during the reign of Edward VI.


      Bartholomew's Night (French: Massacre de la Saint-Barthélemy - massacre of St. Bartholomew) is a massacre of Huguenots in France, carried out by Catholics on the night of August 24, 1572, on the eve of St. Bartholomew's Day. According to various estimates, about three thousand people died in Paris on that day, and throughout France about 30 thousand Huguenots were killed in pogroms.


      France, "Great Terror" - a total of apparently 50 victims of the Terror throughout France, representing 000 out of every 2 population"


      Compared to Europe, there was continuous massacre there. There is no other way to call it.
      1. +1
        31 October 2023 11: 59
        Quote from Eugene Zaboy
        Compared to Europe, there was continuous massacre there. There is no other way to call it.

        And I’m not comparing with Europe. I am considering a purely domestic Russian question - in which era were more people executed?
        The author put forward the thesis that
        The use of the death penalty reached its peak under Tsar Peter I. During the investigation of the Streletsky riot of 1698 alone, about 2 thousand people were executed.

        So I remind you that Peter’s predecessor, despite his nickname, was not distinguished by a quiet disposition - and actively poured the embers of the Peasant War with the blood of those executed.
        1. 0
          31 October 2023 15: 35
          Quote: Alexey RA
          So I remind you that Peter’s predecessor, despite his nickname, was not distinguished by a quiet disposition - and actively poured the embers of the Peasant War with the blood of those executed.


          Alexey Mikhailovich did the same thing that Poroshenko did and whose work Zelensky continues, fought against a popular revolt, or participated in the civil war. There is only one question. Which of them is right and what goals each pursued. How fair was Stepan Razin’s struggle and how fair are Zelensky’s goals? If you answer this question, someone will be acquitted. Was it possible to come to a peaceful agreement with Stepan Razin and was there any sense in this, from the point of view of the state interests of Russia?
  23. +1
    30 October 2023 23: 01
    The death penalty was alien to the legal worldview of the Russian people

    Is that why foreheads were consecrated at the Execution Ground, and popular prints were drawn at Lubyanka?
  24. +1
    31 October 2023 16: 21
    Quote from Fangaro
    The death penalty was alien to the legal worldview of the Russian people

    Is that why foreheads were consecrated at the Execution Ground, and popular prints were drawn at Lubyanka?

    The author is just a clown...
  25. -4
    31 October 2023 20: 04
    The article is liberal vomit. How is THIS allowed for publication?
  26. +1
    1 November 2023 05: 07
    The idea came up that, as a measure of punishment in our humane times, it would be possible to practice voluntary renunciation of citizenship with deportation abroad, so as not to feed the villains.
    1. +1
      1 November 2023 21: 29
      Quote from pavel.tipingmail.com
      The idea came up that, as a measure of punishment in our humane times, it would be possible to practice voluntary renunciation of citizenship with deportation abroad, so as not to feed the villains.

      You forget trifle - it is necessary that the other side borders was ready to accept a stateless person.
      If there is no such consent, you will not be able to deport him. Physically we will not be able to.
  27. 0
    1 November 2023 22: 17
    But it seems to me that the Russian people are quite bloodthirsty.
    This can be seen from the comments to the article.
    Commentators not only approve of the death penalty, but advocate its widest use.

    He prefers to act not according to logic and facts, but according to the first emotions that arise.
    And the idea that the crime rate does not directly depend on the severity of punishment causes undisguised anger and irritation.

    PS It was in 2023 that Israel introduced the death penalty for terrorists. Well, who stopped?
    1. -1
      6 November 2023 20: 18
      If you read M. Gorky’s essay “On the Russian Peasantry,” you can assume that we are talking about traditional ancient relations within society.

      They have no connection with legislation, which is oriented towards international standards.
      And within society it is not law, but custom that operates.

      The custom corresponds to the norms of the “Russian Truth” of the 12th century, according to which murder is compensated by a fine: “It is not a great sin.”

      But the people themselves are kind. In relation to other nations. Because these relationships have nothing to do with internal relationships.
  28. 0
    2 February 2024 18: 45
    Quote: your1970
    If there is an interest, making you a pedophile/maniac/terrorist/incorrigible recidivist has always been a matter of a couple of days.
    "And I am the chapel too? (c)

    If there is an interest for the one whose interest there is, there is no difference between life and death penalty. His interest in both cases will be ensured - the person will disappear. The prison inmates have a favorite song, they say, they set me up, I’m not involved, it’s an accident...
  29. 0
    23 March 2024 14: 14
    This is certainly a very serious topic. In the event that the death penalty is applied in Russia, it should definitely not take place without suffering - which should definitely lead to death!
    There must also be an unambiguous verification of what actually pushed a person or a group of people to commit a crime (serious, etc., etc.)! It could be religious beliefs, etc., etc....
    After all, preparation for death, as for a test, was done religiously by both terrorists in Syria and Wahhabists earlier in the Caucasus, so that, in their conviction, after his death, his soul could receive a great reward for the feat, while the feat itself would be revered his family, people and be an example of behavior for many!
    And, if measures are taken against any religious fanatics, it is necessary, in addition to the death penalty, to take measures also on those religious dogmas that, in essence, cause the greatest damage to the villain - both oblivion and the curse of the soul, clan, etc., etc. tch censure by fellow believers!
    Those atrocities that will be committed should not be considered a feat for the sake of the people and faith, and the villains themselves should not be revered in their family and their people as righteous people, and lead to their repetition!
    Well-known examples: a faithful Muslim does not eat pork, well, there are also some other restrictions on his behavior and obligations by faith, the failure of which should be detrimental to him!
    If we take Christians, then also the consumption of human flesh and blood...
    That is, to lead the villain to the understanding that if he commits an atrocity, this will lead him to the religious death of his soul, etc., etc., which should become a tough barrier for each of them to decide to commit evil - before choosing the death of the soul of a believer with eternal oblivion, because it is precisely the desire to be glorified as a martyr and to appear after one’s death, for the murder (possibly of an infidel - such people of faith as Christians, etc.), in paradise and to receive a high reward from the Lord, as a true believer, or even an Orthodox follower of his religious teachings!
    And all of them, naturally, observed their traditions, which they considered necessary conditions - in their own limitation, for the subsequent reward for their achievements for the soul in the future!
    Naturally, such questions should be accepted or consultations given on this issue - according to the type of punishment, not people of a different faith (or people far from this), but precisely people of the same faith with the villain, so that this does not lead to religious confrontation!
    These measures should lead us all to understanding and respecting other faiths, and the prohibition of causing harm to each other, not only on the basis of the prohibition of state law!
  30. 0
    April 23 2024 15: 44
    Quote: Comrade
    A woman was jailed for five years and two months for stealing three kilograms of lard from a drunk man sleeping on a bench.

    For this there is definitely a death penalty.