The tragedy of Georgy Gapon

92
The tragedy of Georgy Gapon

V. Kossak. "Bloody Sunday", 1905

В previous article it was told about the origin and early life of Georgy Apollonovich Gapon, who quickly went from a modest graduate of the Poltava Theological Seminary to the leader of the workers of St. Petersburg.

We talked about his generally harmless and even useful cooperation with the Police Department, as well as his role in organizing a mass procession to the Winter Palace. Here, representatives of workers and peasants were supposed to hand over to Nicholas II a petition about the people's needs with a request for protection from the tyranny of capitalists and local officials.



However, as you remember, both the emperor himself and his entourage did not like this naive appeal to the “Tsar-Father”. And the attempt to ask Nicholas II for reforms was regarded as unheard of insolence, and the most reactionary members of the imperial family insisted on “exemplary punishment” for the “insolent people.”

The emperor’s uncle, Grand Duke Vladimir Alexandrovich, for example, demanded to “calm the unrest” by publicly hanging “several hundred dissatisfied people.” Representatives of the upper classes did not even want to hear about the true state of affairs in the empire. After all, it was the extremely unfair distribution of national wealth that allowed them to lead a “European lifestyle”: spend time at foreign resorts, spend mind-boggling sums in foreign gambling houses, brothels and taverns, support ballerinas and actresses, and luxuriously furnish their Russian estates and palaces. All these pleasures were paid for by the subjects of Nicholas II, whose standard of living was 3,7 times lower than in Germany and 5,5 times lower than in the USA.


A rooming house in St. Petersburg in the photo of K. Bulla. 1913: “Russia, which we lost” in 1917, and was almost “found” after Yeltsin was elected president of Russia

They even made money from peasants freed from serfdom, since according to the developed “Regulations...” all land remained the property of the landowners. Former serfs were allocated a “field allotment,” for which they had to pay quitrents or work as corvee labor. Peasants had to buy this land for 49 years at a rate of 6% per annum (the average loan rate in the country is 5%). At the same time, the land, which actually cost 544 million rubles, was valued at 897 million.

It is not surprising that the famous Manifesto of the “Tsar-Liberator” caused massive peasant unrest throughout the country, which had to be suppressed for two years with the participation of the army. Only on January 1, 1906, the frightened Nicholas II signed a decree reducing the redemption payments by 2 times, and the following year they were canceled.

But at the beginning of 1905, it seemed to Nicholas II and his entourage that Russia could continue to be controlled with the help of whips and whips. Meanwhile, the prestige of Nicholas II had already suffered a terrible blow after the tragedy of the coronation celebrations on Khodynka Field - and a gloomy prophecy was spreading among the people that the new emperor, “having started with Khodynka, will end with Khodynka.”

The dispersal of the peaceful procession of people who decided to turn to the king “for truth and justice” completely ruined the reputation of the last emperor. From that moment on, he lost his sacred status, and no one believed in the legend about the “good king and evil boyars” that had existed for many centuries.

From now on, the people will blame Nicholas II for all their troubles and misfortunes, and the smartest people from his circle will look gloomily at the future and predict disaster. And in 1910, A. Blok heard how the emperor’s favorite, Admiral Nilov, standing a few steps from him, said to other courtiers:

“There will be a revolution, they will hang us all, but on what pillars – does it matter.”

Bloody Sunday


This day, January 9, 1905, is described in detail, literally minute by minute, in numerous sources. There is no need to repeat ourselves; we will briefly talk only about the course of events and the behavior of the hero of the article - G. A. Gapon.

In the morning, there were up to 11 thousand people in 140 columns (according to the number of branches of the “Assembly of Workers of St. Petersburg”). They walked to Palace Square from the Narva and Nevskaya outposts, the Vyborg and St. Petersburg sides, from Vasilyevsky Island and from Kolpino - but did not know that the tsar had already left the Winter Palace. On their way, the marchers were attacked by troops. At the Trinity Bridge, the procession was shot by soldiers of the Pavlovsky Guards Regiment, and then the fleeing people were pursued by the lancers.


"January 9. At the Trinity Bridge." Painting by an unknown artist

The demonstrators of the Nevsky branch on the Shlisselburg tract were attacked by the Cossacks of the Ataman regiment, but some of the workers moved towards the city center along the ice of the Neva River. Kolpino residents also reached Palace Square in small groups. Here, near the Alexander Garden, they were shot by soldiers of the Preobrazhensky Regiment.

The Semenovsky Life Guards Regiment attacked the march participants on Nevsky Prospekt. At the same time, contrary to the regulations, the order was given to open fire without warning. In August 1906, the commander of this regiment, General G. Min, was killed at the New Peterhof station by a member of the Combat Organization of the Social Revolutionaries Z. Konoplyannikova. Later, she was betrayed by the person who organized this terrorist attack - Yevno Azef.

Former rural teacher Zinaida Vasilievna Konoplyannikova became the first woman hanged in Russia by court verdict. It was she who turned out to be the author of the term “red terror”, declaring at the court hearing:

“The party decided to respond to the white but bloody terror of the government with red terror.”


The Socialist-Revolutionaries also sentenced the commander of the 3rd battalion of this regiment, N. Riman, who especially “distinguished himself” during those events. Miraculously escaping the assassination attempt, he left the country. He returned to Russia a year later in the summer - secretly, after growing a beard.

The poet M. Voloshin witnessed the “exploits” of the Semenovsky regiment, who recalled:

“A strange and almost incredible thing: they shot at the crowd, but it remained completely calm. After the volley, she leaves, and then returns again, picks up the dead and wounded and again stands in front of the soldiers, as if reproachfully, but calm and unarmed. When the Cossacks attacked, only some "intellectuals" fled; workers and peasants stopped, bowed their heads low and calmly waited for the Cossacks, who were chopping their bare necks with sabers. It was not a revolution, but a purely Russian national phenomenon: a “rebellion on the knees.”

However, other memoirists report that some of the demonstrators did not kneel, but took away weapon from soldiers and policemen and beat them. There is, perhaps, no contradiction here: Nevsky was filled with participants in the procession, and in different sections of it people could behave differently.

On Vasilyevsky Island, Valentin Serov saw the confrontation between the march participants and the troops from the window of his workshop:

“I will never forget what I saw from the windows of the Academy of Arts on January 9. A restrained, majestic, unarmed crowd marching towards cavalry attacks and gun sights is a terrible sight.”

Since the Academy of Arts was nominally headed by Grand Duke Vladimir Alexandrovich, who commanded the troops of the St. Petersburg garrison, Serov defiantly left it. That same year, he painted two paintings dedicated to the events of that bloody day. Below you see one of them:


V. Serov. “Soldiers, brave boys! Where is your glory", 1905

And this is a painting by V. Makovsky:


V. Makovsky. “January 9, 1905 on Vasilyevsky Island”, 1905

But it was not possible to completely disperse the workers on Vasilyevsky Island; about 1 people seized the armory and began to build barricades, which were destroyed by the end of that day.

Gapon stood at the head of the column of the Narva department of the “Meeting of Workers of St. Petersburg,” followed by about 50 thousand people. From the nearby chapel, four banners, icons and the stole in which Gapon donned were taken. Along with the icons they carried portraits of Nicholas II and a large white flag with a clearly visible inscription: “Soldiers! Don't shoot at the people!

In the book "Stories my life" Gapon recalled:

“Despite the severe cold, everyone walked without hats, filled with a sincere desire to see the Tsar in order to... cry out their grief on the chest of the Tsar-Father.”

Gapon, who no longer believed in the success of this action, addressed the crowd:

“If the king does not fulfill our request, then we have no king.”

They met with the tsarist troops at the Narva outpost.


“January 9, 1905, Gapon at the Narva Gate”, painting by an unknown artist, 1900s.

Here Gapon's column was attacked by a squadron of the Life Guards Cavalry Grenadier Regiment. The wounded appeared on both sides: several participants in the procession were wounded by sabers, three soldiers received blows with sticks, and the platoon commander received a cross (!).

Gapon called out to the people walking with him: “Forward, comrades! Either death or freedom! - and then 4 salvos were fired by the infantrymen of the 93rd Irkutsk Regiment. 40 people were killed and injured. Two policemen were among the victims of these volleys.

The demonstrators began to retreat along the ice of the Tarakanovka River. Gapon himself later recalled it this way:

“The crowd first knelt down and then lay flat, trying to protect their heads from the hail of bullets, while the back rows took flight... I stood with several survivors and looked at the bodies stretched out around me. I shouted to them: “Get up!”, but they continued to lie down. Why don't they get up?
I looked at them again and noticed how lifelessly their hands lay and how streams of blood ran through the snow. Then I understood everything...
Horror overwhelmed me. My brain was pierced by a thought: and all this was done by the “father king.” In this moment of despair, someone took me by the hand and led me to a side street a few steps from the site of the massacre.
There was no point in resisting. What more could I do?
“We no longer have a king,” I exclaimed. Reluctantly I surrendered into the hands of my saviors.”

Gapon, wounded in the arm, was taken away from the square by workers led by Pyotr Rutenberg: his hair was quickly cut off, he was changed into clothes and taken to A. M. Gorky’s apartment. According to eyewitnesses, Gapon was in a state of shock, and when he came to his senses, he sat down to draw up a proclamation, which contained the following lines:

“Comrade Russian workers! We no longer have a king. A river of blood flowed today between him and the Russian people. It’s time for Russian workers to start fighting for people’s freedom without him. I bless you for today. Tomorrow I will be among you."

Gorky also wrote his appeal to society, in which he accused Emperor Nicholas II and the Minister of Internal Affairs Svyatopolk-Mirsky of premeditated murder of civilians and called for “an immediate, persistent and united struggle against the autocracy.” He told his friends about Gapon on the evening of January 9:

“By some miracle, Gapon remained alive, lies with me and sleeps. He now says that the king is no more, there is no God and there is no Church.”

According to official data, 120 people were killed that day, about 300 were injured, but some researchers bring the number of killed to two thousand people.

On January 11, Nicholas II established the St. Petersburg Governor General, headed by the former Chief of Police of Moscow D. F. Trepov. Arrests of activists of the “St. Petersburg Workers' Meeting” began. Gapon, who was put on the wanted list, managed to travel abroad.

In February, he wrote and sent to the emperor “Letter to Nikolai Romanov, the former Tsar, the former Tsar and the real murderer of the Russian Empire”:

“With naive faith in you, as the father of the people, I peacefully walked towards you with the children of your own people.
You should have known, you knew it.
The innocent blood of the workers, their wives and young children, forever lies between you, O murderer, and the Russian people. You can never have a moral connection with him again. You are no longer able to fetter a mighty river during its flood with any half-measures, even like the Zemsky Sobor.
Bombs and dynamite, individual and massive terror over your offspring and the robbers of the disenfranchised people, a popular armed uprising - all this must and will certainly happen. A sea of ​​blood will be shed like nowhere else.
Because of you, because of your whole house, Russia may perish. Understand all this once and for all and remember it. It’s better to quickly renounce the Russian throne with your entire house and give yourself up to the judgment of the Russian people. Have pity on your children and the Russian country, oh you, offerer of peace for other peoples, but a bloodsucker for your own.
Otherwise, all the blood that has to be shed will fall on you, executioner, and your associates.
Georgy Gapon.
PS Know that this letter is an exculpatory document for the upcoming revolutionary terrorist events in Russia.
February 20/7, 1905"


Aftermath


The shooting of a peaceful march in St. Petersburg made a truly terrible impression on society - both in Russia and abroad. Even some tsarist officials were horrified, and the St. Petersburg mayor Fullon submitted his resignation that same evening. M. Voloshin, already quoted, wrote:

“The motto of the Russian government “Autocracy, Orthodoxy and Nationality” has been thrown into the dust. The government rejected Orthodoxy because it gave the order to shoot at icons and at a religious procession. The government declared itself hostile to the people because it gave the order to shoot at the people who sought protection from the tsar... The people said: The last days have come... The tsar gave the order to shoot at the icons... People, like holy martyrs, are proud of their wounds.”

And then O. Mandelstam left the following entry in his diary:

"The children's hat, mitten, women's scarf, thrown that day on the snows of St. Petersburg, remained a reminder that the tsar must die, that the tsar will die."

Savva Morozov said to Gorky:

“Now the revolution is assured... Years of propaganda would not have achieved what His Majesty himself achieved on this day.”

Leo Tolstoy wrote:

“The Tsar is considered a sacred person, but you have to be a fool, or an evil person, or crazy to do what Nicholas does.”

The newspaper L'Humanité published an article by Jean Jaurès:

“From now on, a river of blood ran between the king and his people. By striking blows at the workers, tsarism mortally wounded itself.”

The bloody events of January 9, 1905 had another truly fatal consequence for the tsarist regime: they irreversibly changed the Russian army. The soldiers and officers of the regiments who stood in the way of the popular procession later experienced the contempt of the entire Russian society. The reputation of both the army and the guard was completely ruined by the participation of the Semenovsky regiment in the bloody suppression of the Moscow December uprising.

In February 1917, the Petrograd regiments would no longer dare to shoot at workers’ demonstrations. And on February 26, 1917, at 17:1, 500 soldiers of the Life Guards Pavlovsky Regiment - the same one that shot at the procession of workers at the Trinity Bridge on January 9, 1905 - were the first to go over to the side of the revolution and opened fire on the police.

However, Nicholas II and his entourage did not understand this then. As the saying goes, known in different versions back in Ancient Greece, “if God wants to punish, he will first take away reason.”

A delegation of specially selected workers was promptly delivered to Nicholas II, to whom he pompously declared:

“It is criminal for a rebellious crowd to express their demands to me... I believe in the honest feelings of the workers and in their unshakable devotion to me, and therefore I forgive them their guilt.”

He addressed the soldiers of the Semenovsky regiment with the following words:

“Thank you from the bottom of my heart for your service. Thanks to your valor and loyalty, sedition has been broken.”

It seems that he really did not understand that from that moment on he became the first Russian emperor who could not and had no right to hope for the protection of his people. And after his abdication, the newspaper “Russkoye Slovo” published an article with the following words:

"With what ease the village refused the tsar ... I can't even believe it, as if the feather had been blown off its sleeve."

Gapon in exile



G. Gapon in London

Having left Russia, Georgy Gapon found himself in the rank of a world celebrity. Newspapers wrote about him, and the most prominent figures of the revolutionary movement - Lenin, Plekhanov, Kropotkin - considered it an honor to meet him personally. It is known about Gapon’s meetings with Jaurès, Clemenceau, and Anatole France. In March he was defrocked by a consistory court. Around this time, he gave preliminary consent to join the Socialist Revolutionary Party (SRs).

Among other things, Gapon took part in sending a shipment of weapons to Russia, which was to be delivered by the steamer John Grafton. This was discussed in the article “Evno Azef. The great provocateur's own game".

Gapon was preparing to continue the fight. His conversation with one of the Finnish revolutionaries, Johann Kokk, is typical. In response to his phrase “you had Gapon in Russia, now you need Napoleon,” he said, as if jokingly:

“How do you know, maybe I’ll be Napoleon.”

And he also, half-jokingly, said to the socialist and journalist V.A. Posse:

“Why is the Gottorp (Romanov) dynasty better than the Gapon dynasty? The Gottorps are a Holstein dynasty, the Gapons are a Khokhlatsky dynasty. It’s time for Russia to be a peasant king, but pure peasant blood flows in me, and Khokhlatsky blood at that.”

On September 30 (October 12), 1906, Gapon wrote a statement about joining the RSDLP(b).

Return to Russia


After the promulgation of the Manifesto of October 17, 1905, Gapon decided to return to Russia and not only restore the “Meeting of St. Petersburg Workers,” but transform it into an all-Russian organization independent of the government (the All-Russian Workers' Union), and perhaps even into a political party .


Gapon, returning from emigration, 1905–1906

He arrived in St. Petersburg illegally and, through intermediaries, entered into negotiations with Prime Minister S. Yu. Witte, who promised to assist in the restoration of the “Assembly” and even compensate for the financial losses suffered by this organization - 30 thousand rubles. He demanded from Gapon an official renunciation of revolutionary activities and a speech in support of the government course.

Witte wanted to act flexibly, and Gapon was ready to come to an agreement with him. However, the “game” was spoiled by the Minister of Internal Affairs P. Durnovo, who demanded that Gapon no longer be an agent of influence, but a real employee of the Police Department. Gapon refused, and Durnovo, through journalists under his control, began to disseminate information in the press about the former priest’s contacts with Witte, and about the funds that were promised to him by the Prime Minister.

By the way, look at what cartoons depicting Gapon, Witte and Durnovo were published in St. Petersburg at that time:


“The Last Stronghold”: N. Gapon, S. Witte and P. Durnovo, Zarnitsa magazine, No. 5 1906

One of his former associates, the former head of one of the branches of the Assembly, Nikolai Petrov, also spoke out against Gapon. In response to rumors about cooperation with the Okhrana, Gapon demanded a public trial of himself.

Death of Gapon


It was rumors about Gapon’s cooperation with the authorities that became the reason for reprisals against him.

The real reason, apparently, was the enormous popularity of Gapon, who claimed to be the leader of the entire revolutionary movement.

On the other hand, many radical opponents of the regime feared that Gapon would actually take the path of peaceful cooperation with the authorities and distract the masses of workers from the “real” revolutionary struggle. This did not suit at all, for example, the head of the Combat Organization of the Social Revolutionaries, Yevno Azef, who, receiving huge funds as an agent of the Security Branch, did not want a significant reduction in funding.

Azef was fully supported by his deputy, the honest and fanatical terrorist Boris Savinkov. It was they who insisted that the Central Committee of the Socialist Revolutionary Party impose a death sentence on Gapon as an Okhrana agent and provocateur.


Yevno Azef and Boris Savinkov

On March 26, 1906, at a meeting of workers, Gapon presented a project for a new organization, which he called the “Program of Russian Syndicalism.” And two days later the “sentence” of the Socialist Revolutionary Party was “carried out.”

It must be said that Gapon was warned about the danger: some said that it came from the Black Hundreds, others advised him to be careful when communicating with the Socialist Revolutionaries. However, Gapon, hoping for his popularity, did not believe in threats.

On March 28, 1906, he went out of town to Ozerki, where he had an appointment with representatives of the Socialist Revolutionary Party. He never returned back.

It was only on April 6 that there were reports in the press that Gapon had gone missing. And on April 16, an official of special assignments at the Police Department, I.F. Manasevich-Manuylov, under the pseudonym “Mask,” published an article in the newspaper “Novoye Vremya” in which he claimed that Gapon was killed by a member of the Combat Organization of the Social Revolutionaries - engineer Pyotr Rutenberg, who had the party nickname Martyn (or – Martyn Ivanovich). Let us recall that it was Rutenberg who actually saved the wounded Gapon at the Narva outpost on January 9, 1905.

A parcel with Gapon's wallet and the key to the fireproof box of the Lyon Credit bank arrived from Berlin to the address of lawyer S. Margolin.


On April 19, the editors of a number of newspapers received anonymous letters saying that Gapon had been killed by the verdict of the “workers’ court” as a “traitor provocateur.”

Gapon’s popularity among the people was so great that the Socialist Revolutionaries did not dare admit to the murder and on April 26 issued an official statement, claiming that “the reports of Novoye Vremya are vile slander.”

And even on July 5 of the same year, Azef refused to Gapon’s killer, P. Rutenberg, to confirm the fact that he acted on the orders of the party. And the Central Committee of the Socialist Revolutionary Party stated that the murder of Gapon was “a private matter of Rutenberg.” The Socialist Revolutionaries recognized the organization of Gapon’s murder only in 1909.

But let's go back to 1906, when on the last day of winter G. A. Gapon suddenly disappeared without a trace.

His body was discovered only on April 30. The owner of the dacha where the murder took place (a certain Zverzhinskaya) noticed that the house she rented was closed and empty. I had to break the locks. The body of the hanged Gapon was found in a room on the second floor. Witnesses identified from photographs the person who appeared in the house that day - it turned out to be Pyotr Rutenberg.


The house in Ozerki where Gapon was killed


The room where the murder took place

Gapon's death, without any exaggeration, shocked many ordinary people. No one believed that the massacre of him was carried out by revolutionaries; agents of the Tsarist Secret Service were suspected of the murder. The newspapers wrote that Gapon was allegedly going to publish some information incriminating senior officials.

Georgy Gapon was buried at the expense of St. Petersburg workers at the suburban Assumption Cemetery (in Pargolovo) on May 3 in the presence of a correspondent from the newspaper “Novoye Vremya”.


Gapon's funeral

At the rally they sang “You fell a victim in the fatal struggle” and “Bravely, comrades, keep up” and demanded revenge. A wooden cross was placed on the grave with the inscription “Hero of January 9, 1905 Georgy Gapon.”

Police officer Kolobasev in his report gave a list of wreaths laid at the grave:

“1) with a red ribbon, with a portrait of Gapon, with the inscription “January 9, to Georgy Gapon from fellow workers, members of the 5th department”; 2) with a black ribbon “to the leader on January 9 from the workers”; 3) with a red ribbon “to the true leader of the January 9 revolution, Gapon”; 4) with a red ribbon “to the dear teacher from the Narva district of the 2nd department” and 5) with a red ribbon “from the Vasileostrovsky department from comrades to the respected Georgy Gapon.”
Then a small metal monument with a white cross and the inscription was placed on the grave:
“Representative of the S.R.F.Z.R. (that is, the Assembly of Russian Factory Workers) Georgy Gapon died at the hands of an assassin on March 28, 1906 at a dacha in Ozerki.”

Later a monument appeared with a cross and the inscription:

“Sleep well, killed, deceived by treacherous friends. Years will pass, the people will understand you, appreciate you, and your glory will be eternal.”

Until 1924, wreaths and mourning ribbons appeared on the grave. Then the monument was destroyed, the grave was forgotten and lost.

No one wanted to remove the dacha where Gapon was killed, and it was demolished in 1909.

But what happened in Ozerki on February 28, 1906?

Circumstances of the murder


In 1909, Rutenberg wrote in the magazine “Byloye” that Gapon, who trusted him, himself spoke about contacts with Witte, explaining that money was needed to create a new workers’ organization and that cooperation with the authorities would be used for the benefit of the revolution. Moreover, he claimed that he offered him 25 thousand rubles for information about the impending assassination attempt on the Minister of Internal Affairs Durnovo. This is at odds with his later statements:

“I’m still not sure whether Gapon’s murder was fair, whether he was actually an agent provocateur.”

What doubts could there be if Gapon really offered him a lot of money for betrayal? Or didn’t he offer it? But it was necessary to somehow explain the murder of a popular labor leader.

One way or another, Rutenberg reported his conversations with Gapon to members of the Central Committee of his party. The head of the Combat Organization, Yevno Azef (who, by the way, himself saved Durnovo from the assassination attempt, receiving 5 thousand rubles for this), with the support of Savinkov, insisted on the “execution of the traitor.” “Carrying out the sentence” was entrusted to Rutenberg himself, who was put in charge of five Socialist Revolutionaries from among the workers.

Rutenberg claimed that during the last meeting they stood outside the door during his conversation with Gapon and were personally convinced of his betrayal. However, this is known only from the words of Rutenberg himself. As for the executors of the sentence, Rutenberg does not even mention their names. And therefore, when preparing an article for the Byloe magazine, Rutenberg had “complete creative freedom.”


P. Rutenberg, Police Department archival photo, 1900s.

B. Nikolaevsky, in a letter to V. Chernov, written in 1931, mentions students A. A. Dikgoff-Derenthal and Yu. Prokopov among Gapon’s murderers, and Burtsev in 1933 even claimed that Derenthal (by the way, the author of the Russian text of operettas “ Violets of Montmartre" and "Charito") tightened the noose around Gapon's neck.


A. A. Dikhof-Derenthal: he looks like a librettist of frivolous operettas, but not much like an executioner calmly tightening the noose around the victim’s neck

Considering that 25 and 27 years have passed respectively since the murder, these testimonies of people who were not present at the “execution” do not inspire much confidence.

Rutenberg claimed that Gapon's last words were:

“Comrades, brothers! Don't believe what you hear! I'm still for you!

Rutenberg allegedly did not take part directly in the murder - he went downstairs. At the time of his death, Gapon was only 36 years old.

Gloomy memories of this murder haunted Rutenberg all his life, and he clearly doubted that he was right. He once said to Savinkov:

“I see him in my dreams... I keep imagining him. Think about it, I saved him on January 9... And now he’s hanging!”

After the murder of Gapon, Rutenberg lived in exile, became interested in the ideas of Zionism, and, since he had once converted to Orthodoxy in order to marry Olga Khomenko, on his own initiative he underwent an ancient rite of repentance for apostasy, receiving 39 lashes, the scars of which remained for life.

In 1917 he returned to Russia, proposed to arrest Lenin and Trotsky, was among the defenders of the Provisional Government, spent six months in the Peter and Paul Fortress and was released at the request of Gorky and Kollontai. Created the Palestine Electric Company. During World War II, he became the head of the Vaad Leumi (National Council), the body of Jewish self-government in Palestine. He died on January 3, 1942 in Jerusalem.

Yevno Azef, at whose insistence the decision to kill Gapon was made, after exposure was also sentenced to death by the Socialist Revolutionaries (January 5, 1909).


Leaflet notification of the Socialist Revolutionary Party about Azef’s cooperation with the Okhrana

However, he managed to leave for Germany, where he led the life of an unremarkable man in the street. During the First World War, as a Russian subject and anarchist (in fact, a former Social Revolutionary), he spent two and a half years in the Berlin Moabit prison; after his release, he did not live long - he died in April 1918 from kidney failure and was buried in an unmarked grave.

Georgy Gapon, who became a victim of Rutenberg and Azef, who really could have been one of the great figures of the Russian Revolution, still officially bears the undeserved stigma of a bloody provocateur.
92 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    19 October 2023 05: 36
    For some reason, the article is missing a small detail. When foreign journalists asked Gapon, during his immigration, what would have happened if the Tsar had come out to the people, he replied that he would have been shot in half a minute.
    1. +4
      19 October 2023 06: 20
      Quote: Dart2027
      that he would have been shot in half a minute.

      Well, send me the link...
      1. +3
        19 October 2023 06: 45
        Quote: Vladimir_2U

        Well, send me the link...

        https://moluch.ru/archive/182/46723/
        1. +6
          19 October 2023 07: 00
          Thank you.

          Subsequently, outside the borders of Russia, Gapon was once asked: “Well, Father George, now we are alone and there is no need to be afraid that dirty laundry will be washed out in public, and that’s a thing of the past. You know how much they talked about the event of January 9 and how often one could hear the judgment that if the Emperor had accepted the delegation with honor and listened kindly to the deputies, everything would have turned out all right. Well, what do you think, oh. George, what would have happened if the Emperor had come out to the people?” To which the priest immediately replied: “They would have killed in half a minute, half a second!”
          Indeed, it is very similar to a tale, because no one asked, under any circumstances - it is unclear. But you never know...
          1. +3
            19 October 2023 07: 13
            Quote: Vladimir_2U
            Indeed, very similar to a bike

            Not really. Gapon was a Socialist Revolutionary, but what did the Socialist Revolutionaries do? Terrorism.
            1. VLR
              +5
              19 October 2023 11: 57
              Gapon was not a Socialist Revolutionary Party - he was going to join this party in exile, but ultimately chose the RSDLP.
              The tragedy of January 9 was inevitable because the reactionary entourage of Nicholas II persuaded him to “give a lesson to the cattle”: to disperse the procession in a demonstrative manner, without sparing ammunition. Grand Duke Vladimir Alexandrovich, commander-in-chief of the troops of the Guard and the St. Petersburg Military District, said directly:
              “The public hanging of several hundred dissatisfied people will calm the troubles.”
              1. +3
                19 October 2023 13: 35
                Quote: VlR
                Gapon was not a Socialist Revolutionary

                And Rutenberg was there!
                Quote: VlR
                Gapon was an idealistic monarchist

                Before the events of January 9? Without a doubt. But it is doubtful whether he remained so after that.
                Georgy Gapon, who became a victim of Rutenberg and Azef

                He played his role and was no longer needed.
                The provocation was a success.
                1. +3
                  19 October 2023 15: 02
                  I wanted to do at least something for the people. Now there are no such people anymore.
              2. +2
                19 October 2023 17: 56
                Quote: VlR
                Gapon was not a Socialist Revolutionary
                What about the other organizers?
                Quote: VlR
                The tragedy of January 9 was inevitable because
                No one would ever allow a crowd into the palace, and there was no riot police at that time. Well, exposing fooled people to bullets is simply a classic of all revolutionaries.
          2. +7
            19 October 2023 15: 49
            Judging by the memoirs of Andreeva (Gorky’s common-law wife...), Savva Morozov spoke somewhat differently on the “subject” of January 9th...

            “The Tsar is a fool... Today he shot people who just yesterday were kneeling before him. Years of Bolshevik agitation could not have done more harm.”...
    2. VLR
      +6
      19 October 2023 06: 40
      This single mention is at odds with all other evidence, and is very similar to a tale. Gapon was an idealistic monarchist, he seriously believed in the possibility of improving the situation of the workers through a direct appeal to Nicholas II, and even organized a “squad”, the members of which were literally supposed to cover with their bodies the emperor who came out to the people in the event of some kind of provocation. And measures were taken to ensure that the first ranks of demonstrators consisted only of absolutely unarmed people, but with icons and royal portraits in their hands.
      1. +1
        19 October 2023 06: 46
        Quote: VlR
        And measures were taken to ensure that the first ranks of demonstrators consisted only of absolutely unarmed people, but with icons and royal portraits in their hands.

        Who covered with their bodies those who followed them.
        Quote: VlR
        organized a “squad”, whose members were literally supposed to cover with their bodies the emperor who came out to the people in the event of some kind of provocation

        That is, after he gets shot?
        1. VLR
          +7
          19 October 2023 07: 08
          Who fired? The people in the front rows are exalted monarchists with icons and royal portraits - who will kneel before the soldiers who shot at them and before the Cossacks rushing towards them. It is likely that there were militants with revolvers in the crowd, but they had no chance to even see Nicholas II. And, given the scale of the procession, very few revolver shots were recorded. It must be admitted that the procession was surprisingly well organized and not a single incident was recorded anywhere before the meeting with the soldiers. And there was nothing to respond to the soldiers’ volleys.
          The most desperate people in some places tried to take away revolvers from policemen and rifles from soldiers, and on Vasilievsky Island they seized a warehouse with weapons. Precisely because they did not have firearms. Garon’s “team” was needed more so that the enthusiastic crowd would not trample the beloved Emperor Nicholas II at that time.
          1. +1
            19 October 2023 07: 16
            Quote: VlR
            It is likely that there were militants with revolvers in the crowd, but they had no chance to even see Nicholas I

            Why would this be so? When someone speaks in front of a crowd, he always stands on a raised platform, otherwise he simply cannot be seen or heard.
            Quote: VlR
            And, given the scale of the procession, very few revolver shots were recorded.

            Quote: VlR
            Precisely because they did not have firearms.

            That is, there were shots, but there were no weapons? How is that?
            1. VLR
              +5
              19 October 2023 11: 28
              When someone speaks in front of a crowd, he always stands on a raised platform, otherwise he simply cannot be seen or heard.

              There was no elevation there, and there was no plan. Nicholas II was not required to “push a speech” - he had to go out and accept the petition from the same Gapon and promise that it would be carefully considered, Gapon would then give a signal that the goal had been achieved and this signal would be transmitted further down the ranks. Nikolai smiles, says that he is with the people with all his heart, hints at a favorable outcome, and then - commissions with the participation of working delegates (who are appeased and bribed in every possible way), meetings, approvals - but the process goes on! In general, there is a high chance that they would have “chattered” in the worst bureaucratic traditions.
              1. +2
                19 October 2023 17: 59
                Quote: VlR
                Nicholas II was not required to “push a speech” - he had to go out and accept a petition from the same Gapon

                And initially this petition did not contain a demand for surrender to the Japanese.
                Quote: VlR
                Nikolai smiles, says that he is with the people with all his heart, hints at a favorable outcome

                And no one will see or hear this. That's not how things are done.
      2. +3
        19 October 2023 07: 01
        Quote: VlR
        He even organized a “squad”, whose members were supposed to literally cover with their bodies the emperor who came out to the people in the event of some kind of provocation. And measures were taken to ensure that the first ranks of demonstrators consisted only of absolutely unarmed people

        Well, to some extent this can serve as confirmation of the story. hi
      3. +4
        19 October 2023 15: 58
        Nicholas could not “go out” to the demonstrators for a completely banal reason. He simply wasn’t in St. Petersburg...

        Probably not everyone knows that he NEVER LIVED in “Winter” AT ALL. But he simply made occasional “raids” there when the rules of the Palace or diplomatic “protocol” required it... Although his “pennant” “fluttered” constantly at the residence. Giving the impression that “himself” is “here” all the time. And “himself”, after his visits to Zimny, immediately went to Tsarskoe Selo. Where he lived PERMANENTLY...

        At one time, A. Shirokorad very thoroughly, relying on an array of archival documents, proved this circumstance.
        1. VLR
          +4
          19 October 2023 17: 11
          But Nikolai was told that people were going to meet him at the Winter Palace. I could come specially, or I could say, “Come on, go to Tsarskoye Selo or Peterhof, I’ll accept your petition there.” But Vel gave it instead. Prince Vladimir Alexandrovich carte blanche to forcefully disperse the procession. The Romanovs wanted to give a lesson to the “cattle” and “cattle” - so that in the future they would not dare to raise their heads. And we got a revolution.
          1. +3
            19 October 2023 19: 56
            Quote: VlR
            But Nikolai was informed that people were going to meet him at the Winter Palace

            The fact that he left the city was also known to all interested parties.
          2. +1
            20 October 2023 12: 12
            Dear Valery...

            It is unlikely that Nicholas II could “come” to St. Petersburg upon receiving this or that report or message. Moreover, to “go out” to someone there...

            Simply because EVERY trip he made to the capital was accompanied by preliminary elaboration and implementation of measures to ensure his safety. After all, he did not live in Zimny, precisely for reasons of ensuring the safety of himself and his family members...

            As for his attitude towards the “cattle” (that is, the people), then in general he treated everyone except his family members - children, wife - with extreme indifference... At least towards the “ministers”, for sure. ..

            Of course, he didn’t call them “cattle”, but he got rid of them, if necessary, as easily and without emotion as from used toilet paper...
          3. 0
            20 October 2023 12: 20
            Yes and more...

            The fact is that the “lessons” you mentioned - punitive expeditions, floggings, etc., already from the autumn of 1904, for MONTHS, were given in many Russian provinces, where the mass discontent of the peasants was comparable in scale to the scale of the rebellion impostor Pugachev... Cossacks, gendarme squadrons, troops... Floggings, courts, prisons...

            So, Peter, in this context it was only within the framework of an already established “trend”. Another thing is that peasants in the provinces did not submit loyal “petitions” in advance. And, so to speak, they took up the pitchforks right away...
    3. +3
      19 October 2023 11: 24
      Quote: Dart2027
      then he replied that he would have been shot in half a minute.

      +++ In addition, the well-known Nikolai Starikov pointed out the events of that day, which were not covered in the article: for example, before the soldiers started shooting, provocateurs from the crowd targeted officers...
      1. +3
        19 October 2023 19: 57
        Quote: aybolyt678
        for example, before the soldiers started shooting, provocateurs from the crowd targeted the officers

        And that too.
    4. +5
      19 October 2023 13: 35
      “Georgy Gapon, who became a victim of Rutenberg and Azef, who really could have been one of the great figures of the Russian Revolution, still officially bears the undeserved stigma of a bloody provocateur.”
      ************************************************** *************************************
      The article is missing a lot of "details"...

      In particular, about the real “pastime” of this “revolutionary” behind the cordon, during the so-called. "emigration". Indeed, at first, various revolutionary parties offered him cooperation. Alas, this guy, with excessive conceit, wanted to be exclusively “in charge.” And he himself “steers” in parties. Naturally, he was “sent away”...

      Well, and then, receiving hefty fees for his “interviews” and the publication of his memoirs in the local media, he quickly spilled the beans in casinos and brothels... Moreover, while still “in office”...

      And when he returned to Russia, Mr. Gerasimov’s department “sheltered” him, having very skillfully played on his excessive pride. And he did become an agent. Paid...

      And it was Gapon who began to “work” FIRST with Rutenberg. Having received a task from Mr. Gerasimov’s department to reach the top of the Socialist Revolutionary “militia” through Rutenberg. Rutenberg, to whom Gapon had already openly started offering money and “career growth,” could not believe “his ears” for a long time. For Gapon, the “former” one, was initially idolized...

      Well, and then, naturally, he informed his “leadership” (with the “trump” secret police agent Azef at the head. Who did not tolerate “competitors” (especially “with prospects”) in the field of work for the gendarme department. And, of course, he demanded "judge" and destroy the "traitor"...
  2. +5
    19 October 2023 06: 28
    On September 30 (October 12), 1906, Gapon wrote a statement about joining the RSDLP(b).
    It turns out that Gapon, a member of the CPSU, since 1906, and the Socialist Revolutionaries unleashed terror against the Bolsheviks back in 1906? laughing
    1. +1
      20 October 2023 08: 34
      member of the CPSU, since 1906,

      There was no way he could have been a member of the CPSU, because this name appeared only in 1952, when the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) was renamed recourse
  3. +7
    19 October 2023 06: 47
    “Carrying out the sentence” was entrusted to Rutenberg himself, who was put in charge of five Socialist Revolutionaries from among the workers. Rutenberg claimed that during the last meeting they stood outside the door during his conversation with Gapon and were personally convinced of his betrayal. Gapon’s last words were: “Comrades, brothers! Don't believe what you hear! I'm still for you! However, this is known only from the words of Rutenberg himself.

    This assertion by Rutenberg is refuted by A. A. Derental’s own memoirs about the murder of Gapon, which were published by him in “Byly” under the cryptonym “NN”:
    Gapon did not make excuses and did not say anything at all for a banal reason - leaving the room, he ran into Comrade at the door. Grigory (Yur. Prokopov). He was not taken aback, grabbed a liter ladle from a tub of water and hit Gapon in the face with it. Gapon fell, losing consciousness. Comrades who jumped out from the next room grabbed Gapon, tied him up, and threw a noose over him. Comrade Martyn (Ptr. Rutenberg) brought him to his senses with slaps and read out the verdict of the Party. After which the loop was tightened, tying it to the hanger. When the body stopped twitching, we threw a coat from the closet over it (sic), drank on the terrace, smoked and went our separate ways...(c)
    1. +8
      19 October 2023 07: 20
      “Carrying out the sentence” was entrusted to Rutenberg himself, who was put in charge of five Socialist Revolutionaries from among the workers.

      Of the five “workers”, two at that time were students of the Military Medical Academy - Derenthal and Prokopov, one was an engineer at the Putilov plant - Rutenberg. It is not known what the other “workers” were by profession. It is reliably known that all the killers were members of the Socialist Party. And that their victim was the person who wrote the application to join the RSDLP(b).
    2. VLR
      +5
      19 October 2023 07: 20
      I believe that they drank (and very heavily) even before the murder - “for courage.” That is, Gapon was killed by a drunken crowd - just like Emperors Peter III and Paul I.
      1. +7
        19 October 2023 07: 41
        One of Gapon's killers, Prokopov, was shot dead in 1910. in Nizhny Novgorod during a gendarme raid, and Dikgoff-Derenthal was sentenced to death on March 2, 1939 by the Military Collegium of the USSR Armed Forces. Shot the next day in Moscow. Rehabilitated in 1997.
        1. +7
          19 October 2023 07: 56
          Derenthal (by the way, the author of the Russian text of the operettas “The Violets of Montmartre” and “Charito”)

          And, by the way, since March 1918, Boris Savinkov’s closest assistant was a member of the leadership of SZRiS. Derenthal's relationship with Savinkov was very interesting - Dikgoff-Derenthal's wife Emma (Lyubov) Efimovna Store was Savinkov's personal secretary and at the same time mistress. In 1920-1921, the Dikhoffs and Savinkov lived in the same apartment in Poland.
          a photo. Emma (Lyubov) Efimovna Store

          On August 16, 1924, during Operation Syndicate-2, carried out by security officers, Savinkov, Dikhof-Derenthal and his wife crossed the Polish-Soviet border and the entire “sweet trinity” was arrested in Minsk.
    3. +2
      19 October 2023 16: 08
      "Rutenberg claimed that during the last meeting they stood outside the door during his conversation with Gapon and were personally convinced of his betrayal."
      ************************************************** *************************************
      Not behind the door, but in the “next room”...

      It was “in the country” and the audibility there was excellent. First, the “invited witnesses” listened to almost the entire “recruitment conversation” by Gapon Rutenberg. And then, when the parties had almost “shaked hands,” they burst into the room where the “action” was taking place.

      Stunned, Gapon practically “shit his pants”... The verdict was read out to him. And, yes, the crowd, chaotically and interfering with each other, began to “carry out execution”...
  4. +6
    19 October 2023 06: 51
    Since the Academy of Arts was nominally headed by Grand Duke Vladimir Alexandrovich, who commanded the troops of the St. Petersburg garrison, Serov defiantly left it.
    There is an urban legend that Serov, who was a court portrait painter of the royal family, after the events of Bloody Sunday, announced to the Minister of the Court Fredericks: “I will no longer set foot in this house!”, meaning the Winter Palace.
    Thank you, Valery!
  5. +12
    19 October 2023 06: 59
    Rutenberg, according to him, allegedly did not take part directly in the murder

    Don't give a damn! He simply organized the murder, brought in the perpetrators, and read the verdict to the victim. And so - clean as glass. belay Ugh, fool
  6. The comment was deleted.
    1. +7
      19 October 2023 07: 07
      a photo. court photo from 1907. Autopsy of the body of priest Georgiy Gapon at the dacha in Ozerki
  7. +12
    19 October 2023 07: 07
    In February 1917, the Petrograd regiments would no longer dare to shoot at workers’ demonstrations.” - by 1917, the personnel of the Russian army and the guard, including, almost completely died at the front. In the rear, in the barracks, there were mobilized men dressed in military uniforms who categorically did not want to go to the front. This was not an army. There were 2 - 3 career officers per regiment. Naturally, this gathering could not and did not want to suppress the popular uprising.
    1. +5
      19 October 2023 10: 23
      And before the guards regiments died at the front, they were formed exclusively from nobles, not from men? From private to officer?
  8. +5
    19 October 2023 08: 56
    several participants in the procession were wounded by sabers, three soldiers received blows with sticks, and the platoon commander received a cross (!).

    What people had to fight back with crosses, in my opinion, directly indicates that they were not ready for the attack and did not intend to attack themselves.
    1. +2
      19 October 2023 16: 16
      There, in general, no one and no one was actually going to “attack” anyone...

      The demonstration and the workers went “to the Tsar” (who, I repeat, was not in the Winter Palace...) with a “petition”. And if the author had cited its text (and it has been available for a long time...), it would become clear that this is a purely loyal procession, without the slightest intention of violence...

      In turn, the troops concentrated at the Winter Palace acted according to the Charter. And they opened fire, on the orders of the officers, only when the crowd (and for the military, this is just a “crowd”...), without responding to warnings, approached the armed cordon at a “dangerous” distance. What was fraught with an attack on the cordon and attempts to disarm it...
      1. -3
        20 October 2023 01: 55
        Moreover, the author writes:
        The demonstrators of the Nevsky branch on the Shlisselburg tract were attacked by the Cossacks of the Ataman regiment, but some of the workers moved towards the city center along the ice of the Neva River.

        And even absolutely Soviet sources that Wiki quotes (and the author) paint a slightly different picture:
        "...Three deputies, led by the chairman of the department Petrov, approached the officer and entered into a conversation with him, asking him to let the workers through to the Winter Palace. The officer demanded that the workers disperse and, to intimidate, ordered three volleys of blank cartridges to be fired. The crowd rushed back, but did not retreated. Some workers tried to escape, but others stopped them, saying: “Comrades!.. Stop!.. Don’t change!” Then the officer threw forward a detachment of Cossacks, who began to push back the crowd with swords and pikes." (The beginning of the first Russian revolution. January-March 1905. Documents and materials / Edited by N. S. Trusova. - M.: Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences, 1955)
        The picture immediately looks different.
  9. -1
    19 October 2023 09: 13
    Gapon deservedly bears the stigma of a bloody provocateur; it could not have been otherwise; all the vigorous activity of Gapon himself occurred during a crisis of traditional religiosity, as is the pope, so is the parish, as we know.
    The St. Petersburg workers of those years were the so-called otkhodniks, former peasants who, having moved to the city, lost their usual rural religious way of life, they didn’t offer a new way of life, by the way, they weren’t even allowed into St. Isaac’s Cathedral. The level of religiosity dropped greatly, and then drunkenness, fornication, abortion .
    1. +9
      19 October 2023 09: 27
      The St. Petersburg workers of those years were the so-called otkhodniks, former peasants who, having moved to the city, lost their usual rural religious way of life, they didn’t offer a new way of life, by the way, they weren’t even allowed into St. Isaac’s Cathedral... drunkenness, fornication, abortion.

      With what contempt you write about these people. Of course, they didn't crunch like French rolls.
      1. -3
        19 October 2023 09: 39
        Quote: vet
        With what contempt

        No need to fantasize.
        I recommend opening the Big Encyclopedia and finding the section - OTKHODNIKING
    2. +5
      19 October 2023 13: 33
      Quote: bober1982
      ..... The St. Petersburg workers of those years were the so-called otkhodniks, former peasants who, having moved to the city, lost their usual rural religious way of life, they didn’t offer a new way of life, by the way, they weren’t even allowed into St. Isaac’s Cathedral. The level of religiosity dropped greatly, and then drunkenness, fornication, abortion.

      And what, besides St. Isaac's Cathedral, were there no others? Especially at that time? According to archival data, before the Revolution there were about 500 Orthodox churches. They were also at plants and factories; it was support for the owners in their operation. Mostly young and healthy men came from the villages, and the working day while Vladimir, hi It should be well known that in factories and factories it was 11,5 hours during the day, and at night and before holidays it was 10 hours.
      There were reports, however, about overtime that was forced by the owners. Unskilled work was wearing out. They tried to send the money they earned to families in the village. We were exhausted. We were tired. And when was it time to fornicate and get drunk? We went to the baths. Someone tried to study. To master literacy or obtain a specialty.
      1. +4
        19 October 2023 14: 46
        A little chaotic, Dima, but overall I read it with interest.
        What’s the matter here - when peasants came from the village to the city, take for example your native St. Petersburg, where 60% of the workers were from peasants - then the people’s traditional religious order was violated and the reasons were the brutal mug of capitalism and the notorious progress .
        People stopped going to Church, to put it simply, of course.
        I mentioned St. Isaac's Cathedral for the reason that this is an egregious case, and not because..... before the revolution there were 500 Orthodox Churches
        1. +3
          19 October 2023 20: 13
          Vladimir, I just now saw your comment. I think that the newly arrived people did not stop going to church, if anyone had gone before. Except for those who became interested in various work circles. Populist groups appeared back in the 19th century, and others later. Including Marxist ones
          What about the religious order? recourse I’m not sure that he was in the village. Denikin wrote with surprise in his memoirs about the soldiers’ negative attitude towards the church. And the soldiers were mostly from peasants.
  10. VLR
    +11
    19 October 2023 09: 16

    A rooming house in St. Petersburg in the photo of K. Bulla. 1913

    It was these people who were later moved to “communal apartments”. Later, communal apartments were perceived as evil, and Bulgakov already wrote about “the housing issue that ruined everyone.” However, at first, a separate room was perceived by people as unheard of luxury and unprecedented happiness.
    1. +8
      19 October 2023 10: 08
      Life of ordinary working people at the end of the 19th century. Gilyarovsky perfectly described in his works, the living conditions that are presented in this photo are simply paradise compared to the sketches of Uncle Gilya.
      1. VLR
        +4
        19 October 2023 10: 32
        By the way, this is an illustration for N. Nosov’s book “Dunno on the Moon” (written in 1964-1965), which very truthfully tells about the “charms of life” in capital countries and which in the “dashing 90s” many called “ ahead of its time" and "prophetic." Hotel "Economic":

        1. 0
          20 October 2023 00: 08
          In modern times, an ordinary hostel. In fact, it’s a flophouse of the XNUMXst century. Capitalism...
    2. +5
      19 October 2023 11: 05
      Quote: VlR
      .....at first, a separate room was perceived by people as unheard of luxury and unprecedented happiness.

      hi yes, it was a luxury and it is known that a single person, a complete stranger, could be accommodated in such rooms recourse . And there were cases when people were seated in a sort of hallway. In some manorial apartments there were large hallways, even with windows, and from these hallways there were doors to other rooms.
      As for the photo of the shelter, I don’t see anything terrible there. If we remember and compare with the descriptions of the conditions that existed in the workers’ barracks that the factory owners built next to their factories.
      3-tier beds where people slept in shifts, depending on their work.
      I really liked the article! Thank you Valery! I have some questions that after some time I will formulate and write.
    3. +3
      19 October 2023 11: 29
      these people were then moved to "communal apartments". Later, communal apartments were perceived as evil

      A room in a communal apartment was too cool for those times, hostels (worker barracks) became more common, my grandparents lived in such a “barracks” until the end of the 60s.
      P.S. There is another caption for this photo: “Bedroom for workers of the Trusteeship of People’s Sobriety, 1909”
      1. +3
        19 October 2023 12: 53
        Quote: Vladimir80
        .... my grandparents lived in such a “barracks” until the end of the 60s. ....

        hi This is a very interesting addition, Vladimir! The Bolsheviks tried to improve living conditions even before the Second World War. But......... Just dormitories for workers began to be built at the same time, in Leningrad. Sometimes very close to plants and factories. Sometimes in some beautiful places, such as on Krestovsky Island, there were dormitories for workers, among whom there were many visitors from the villages. After the Second World War, the housing problem had to be solved anew, since there was enormous damage to the entire national economy.
        I wonder what city your grandparents lived in, Vladimir?
        1. +4
          19 October 2023 16: 24
          in what city

          in the near Moscow region...
          p.s. despite all Khrushchev’s many mistakes, we can thank him for mass housing construction
          1. VLR
            +3
            19 October 2023 17: 01
            In fact, they say that the program for the mass construction of apartment buildings was adopted under Stalin, but Khrushchev, in pursuit of penny savings, distorted it: there were projects for good, beautiful houses with spacious apartments, but Khrushchev demanded that everything be made cheaper. And what we got were miserable “Khrushchev” apartments with an inconvenient layout, small kitchens, combined bathrooms and low ceilings. The savings turned out to be insignificant, but entire areas of the cities were disfigured by dull blocks of uncomfortable five-story buildings, which were actually intended as temporary buildings for 20 years.
            1. +1
              19 October 2023 18: 07
              the program for the mass construction of apartment buildings was adopted under Stalin

              1947, if my memory serves me correctly. I have already covered this issue on the site in the comments, I’m too lazy to clarify and repeat myself.
              1. +2
                19 October 2023 18: 57
                Quote: A vile skeptic
                ...1947, if my memory serves me correctly.

                The Program for the Restoration of the National Economy after the Great Patriotic War began
            2. +4
              19 October 2023 18: 53
              Quote: VlR
              In fact, they claim that the program for the mass construction of apartment buildings was adopted under Stalin......

              Good evening, Valery! Efforts to improve the lives of workers began immediately after the Civil War! Clinics, schools, technical schools, universities, sports stadiums, Palaces of Culture, dormitories for visiting workers, and kitchen factories were built! The management wanted to improve the lives of workers, to relieve them of everyday hassles as much as possible! Industrialization was taking place, it was necessary to work, and work a lot, and with interest, with volume. Residential buildings in 2 directions --- houses for management, for foreign specialists, and for ordinary residents. There were no building materials, no specialists, there was terrible economy, materials left over from destroyed buildings were often used. Now this style is called constructivism. These houses began to appear in the late 20s, and before the war. We started with 2 storeys and up to 6 storeys. Of course, those that were built from old materials were destroyed. Not all of them have survived. Those that have survived (today), many of them are recognized as architectural monuments. And already before the war, there were experiments in large-block construction. These houses sometimes still exist! In the Moscow region, for example, we have on Blagodatnaya and recourse and somewhere else.... True, they are all plastered, as was customary then, and these blocks are not visible from the outside, early 30s.... sometimes they say about them that these are “pre-war Stalinka” or “Kirov” buildings. They are all different quality and in different places.
            3. +2
              20 October 2023 06: 29
              the program for the mass construction of apartment buildings was adopted under Stalin, but Khrushchev, in pursuit of penny savings, distorted it: there were projects for good, beautiful houses with spacious apartments, but Khrushchev demanded that everything be made cheaper. And what we got were miserable “Khrushchev” apartments with an inconvenient layout, small kitchens, combined bathrooms and low ceilings. The savings turned out to be insignificant, but entire areas of the cities were disfigured by dull blocks of uncomfortable five-story buildings, which were actually intended as temporary buildings for 20 years.

              in general, you are right, but there are details - it was the construction of panel “Khrushchev” buildings that was as industrial as possible and accelerated the construction period of the building several (!) times, and the decree “on surplus” led to the appearance of “stripped” brick houses, from which decorative cornices were removed and arches, etc. (they simplified the facades) - here, of course, the savings were meager
              p.s. Khrushchev probably sincerely hoped to build communism in the USSR by the 1980s, so mass panel housing construction of not very comfortable houses seemed then a way out of the situation...
          2. +2
            19 October 2023 18: 20
            Quote: Vladimir80
            .... p.s. despite all Khrushchev’s many mistakes, we can thank him for mass housing construction

            It’s a pity that the one who put a minus didn’t write why he decided so, didn’t share his knowledge with us request I used to think so too, that it was Khrushchev who began mass construction. Later I found out that this is completely wrong! Not only in this matter, as in others,
            Khrushchev continued what he started earlier.
            1. +1
              20 October 2023 06: 40
              It was Khrushchev who began mass construction. Later I found out that this is completely wrong

              Of course, mass construction began earlier, but it was under Khrushchev that the technologies of large-panel housing construction (prefabricated multi-storey buildings) were mastered, many reinforced concrete plants were built, etc. (I say this as a builder).... Whether this is good or bad, I don’t know. But the ability to prepare a pit with a foundation in a month, and then assemble the entire house in another month, made it possible to build tens of millions of square meters in the shortest possible time. At the same time, surprisingly, brick houses with prefabricated reinforced concrete floors continued to be built (if you remember the film “The Adventures of Shurik”, it was on the construction of a five-story brick building that he worked)
              1. +3
                20 October 2023 09: 05
                Quote: Vladimir80
                .... of course, mass construction began earlier, but it was under Khrushchev that the technologies of large-panel housing construction were mastered .... (I say this as a builder)....

                hi it's like that. But (as I have drawn up many inspection reports for today’s St. Petersburg residential buildings, I say), under Khrushchev, those house-building experiments that began in the late 20s were completed in this way. For example, the construction of 2-story Stalin buildings began, and there were options for each family to have a separate entrance. And the ceilings are either normal or high. And if the common staircase is wide and has floor-to-ceiling windows... There have been attempts. They wanted to build a "garden city". Precisely for workers.... The shortage of all materials led to the fact that very long houses began to appear in order to save on the side walls. In some houses of that time, glazing appeared ---- 12 parts per standard window. Somewhere they began to make wooden stairs in houses of that time. Sometimes I saw them in 5th floors. request I think if it weren’t for the war, the results would have been earlier and better. After all, there is something to compare with. There was something to strive for. For example, houses built at that time for management or foreign specialists (pre-war Stalinist buildings are on a completely different level). It is interesting that at that pre-war time there was an absolutely enormous construction of educational institutions ---- schools, technical colleges, colleges. Most of the technical schools and schools stopped working in the 90s... In addition --- Palaces of Culture, factories. (which also began to close gradually). That is, at first the Bolsheviks provided a huge foundation for the public social side of life and health --- kindergartens, summer holidays, clinics, sanatoriums, stadiums...
  11. +4
    19 October 2023 10: 13
    The great adventurer priest Gapon in the revolutionary movement. Both yours and ours, and not a great figure in the revolutionary movement. In your own words:
    Around this time, he gave preliminary consent to join the Socialist Revolutionary Party (SRs).
    On September 30 (October 12), 1906, Gapon wrote a statement about joining the RSDLP (b)
    .
    He arrived in St. Petersburg illegally and, through intermediaries, entered into negotiations with Prime Minister S. Yu. Witte
    And yes, in 1906 there was no organizational RSDLP (b), there was an RSDLP, in which there were two factions, Mensheviks and Bolsheviks. Organizationally, the RSDLP (b) took shape in 1912, with its own official printed organ and cash desk.
  12. +4
    19 October 2023 10: 15
    The great adventurer priest Gapon in the revolutionary movement. Both yours and ours, and not a great figure in the revolutionary movement. In your own words:
    Around this time, he gave preliminary consent to join the Socialist Revolutionary Party (SRs).
    On September 30 (October 12), 1906, Gapon wrote a statement about joining the RSDLP (b)
    .
    He arrived in St. Petersburg illegally and, through intermediaries, entered into negotiations with Prime Minister S. Yu. Witte
    And yes, in 1906 there was no organizational RSDLP (b), there was an RSDLP, in which there were two factions, Mensheviks and Bolsheviks. Organizationally, the RSDLP (b) took shape in 1912, with its own official printed organ and cash desk.
    1. +4
      19 October 2023 12: 13
      The site today is a bit strange. I also duplicated some comments, I had to delete the copies manually.
      1. +5
        19 October 2023 12: 41
        That’s not the right word, I rushed late to remove one of the two. I didn’t notice the “miracle” right away.
  13. +1
    19 October 2023 10: 47
    Gapon was a calculating man with ambitions and a thirst to rule over bodies and, worse, over souls. And possessing charisma coupled with the gift of an orator, he achieved this. He exposed the people who blindly believed him to volleys and checkers. He played too hard because of his pride, tried to bend the authorities and, accordingly, become the authorities himself. The pedophile, and by no means a disinterested person, pretended to be a shepherd of the poor and orphaned. We will not know his true goals, but due to his contribution to the organization of the Troubles he received his fate. He created the Troubles and the Troubles devoured him. But whether he was an agent or not, whether the government used him or he used it, is no longer so important.
  14. +1
    19 October 2023 11: 29
    On the eve of all these events, the state of affairs in the country was critical, the collapse of the autocracy was inevitable, and when some unknown and talkative impostor priest begins to act as a defender of the oppressed and humiliated, this is already a farce, and it’s too bad that it turned out bloody.
    Here, from the sermon of St. John of Kronstadt, the sermon was called: Wake up, drunkards!
    .........what should I say to the people? They were extremely overcome by drunkenness. They could not walk a step without encountering a drunk at any time - on holidays and weekdays, in the morning, afternoon and evening, and even at night.
    Here are the words of St. Ignatius Brianchaninov:
    It is obvious that deviations from the Orthodox faith are universal among the people.
    There is no morality in the monasteries; true monks are not allowed to live by monastic actors.
  15. +3
    19 October 2023 11: 37
    There are so many intercessors for Nicholas 2, who want to justify the obvious and still seemingly uncontested crime of the tsarist regime against its people. Even under Yeltsin, there was no attempt to officially rehabilitate the actions of the tsarist authorities on Bloody Sunday.
    1. +4
      19 October 2023 12: 44
      Even under Yeltsin, there was no attempt to officially rehabilitate the actions of the tsarist authorities on Bloody Sunday.
      Times change. laughing And then, now, no matter who you point at, they are all descendants of nobles and boyars. You won’t find descendants, workers and peasants. laughing
  16. +1
    19 October 2023 12: 54
    Quote: Sergey Valov
    In February 1917, the Petrograd regiments would no longer dare to shoot at workers’ demonstrations.” - by 1917, the personnel of the Russian army and the guard, including, almost completely died at the front. In the rear, in the barracks, there were mobilized men dressed in military uniforms who categorically did not want to go to the front. This was not an army. There were 2 - 3 career officers per regiment. Naturally, this gathering could not and did not want to suppress the popular uprising.


    Not only peasants. According to Solzhenitsyn ("200 years together") there were a lot of Jews there who wanted to fight even less.
  17. +1
    19 October 2023 16: 35
    The cruelty of “Bloody Sunday” may have been due to the fact that monarchical power was already completely dependent on capital, although nominally, in the eyes of the people, it should have been above it. There was most likely already a lot of tension in this regard within monarchist circles, but they could not do anything.
    To accept the delegation and not fulfill its requests meant losing face. And the brutal suppression of the demonstration relieved the accumulated discontent and confirmed the status of “master of the Russian land.” Although the actual owner was already capital, which wanted to take power on the wave of discontent of the electorate, which did not belong to it. He succeeded in overthrowing the monarchy, but not in taking and maintaining power. For the means of its production also dictate its character and genesis.
    1. -1
      19 October 2023 17: 36
      Quote from cpls22
      Although the actual owner was already capital, wanting to take power on the wave of discontent among the electorate
      The owner is the one who runs the household....Therefore, there is an obvious contradiction - there cannot be any owner without the legal right and authority to do so. And if he does exist, as it were, he is a bandit, not the owner, and he will plunder the country’s economy

      In no country in the world has capital been the master until it has established capitalist legislation. Even modern Britain, with its formal monarchy, is closer in its state structure to Soviet power than modern Russia with its classical separation of powers.

      The simple fact is that Russian society psychologically perceives legislation only as a screen and, UNDER ALL AUTHORITIES, lives the same way - in fact, under the Autocracy. Even now, and even more so with the living Tsar.

      Russian society is not at all interested in legal rights, by default considering any lawlessness to be a normal, natural thing; divide the country into parts in the night Belovezhsky forest, shoot the Congress of People's Deputies, simulate elections...... In Russia, only Autocracy is real, everything else is utopia and surrealism.

      In the Empire, with its class division, power was firmly in the hands of the nobles, although money was in the hands of capitalists. This did not suit them. If capital had been the master in Russia in 1905, there would be no need for it to push it towards the February revolution in 1917.
      1. +1
        19 October 2023 19: 12
        If capital had been the master in Russia in 1905, there would be no need for it to push it towards the February revolution in 1917.

        Yes, legally he was not the owner. But with his money he held power circles by the gills. That's why he was able to overthrow the monarchy. Having bought someone, and left someone without funds. There is no power without money.
        During perestroika, the party power was torn apart by the “red directors”, and the Soviet power in the “holy nineties” was torn by money from overseas.
  18. +1
    19 October 2023 16: 56
    Interesting, informative educational publication.
    Quote: [quote][/quote]However, Nicholas II and his entourage did not understand this then. As the saying goes, known in different versions back in Ancient Greece, “if God wants to punish, he will first take away reason.”

    He addressed the soldiers of the Semenovsky regiment with the following words:
    “Thank you from the bottom of my heart for your service. Thanks to your valor and loyalty, sedition has been broken.”

    - Fans of the Russian “father-tsar” and modern “faithful servants of the throne” still assure us that the tsar was not in St. Petersburg at that time and he never dreamed of it. not in spirit... Good king, bad boyars... They crunched on French rolls...

    The autocrat left out of harm's way, fearing that a crowd with banners, icons and a petition would break through to the palace. But this did not stop him from later cordially “with all his heart” thanking the bloody executioners for a job well done (according to various estimates, up to 2 thousand were shot and hacked to death). From the crowd they shouted to the firing squads of the Life Guards and to the blood-crazed Cossacks and Life Dragoons: “Why are you beating us like the Japanese?” Answer: “And you are worse than the Japanese!”...
    No one was punished for the bloody crime; they were rewarded.

    To be honest, I was impressed by the description of how they cut down the crowd with checkers and sabers, trampled them with horses, and there were women, children... Near Mukden, these dashing grunts would...

    In Soviet school textbooks, I remember, Gapon was made almost the main culprit of the massacre.


  19. 0
    19 October 2023 20: 29
    Gapon, Derenthal, Azef, Rutenberg... that's who kneaded our history...
  20. +1
    19 October 2023 22: 45
    I have long been interested in the past life of people in our city. Interested in transport, for example, how we got there. The problem of distances.
    Demonstrators of the Nevsky branch on the Shlisselburg tract.....Kolpintsy.....

    For example, the Shlisselburg Tract. Now this is the People's Militia Avenue, named after the workers' protests in 1901. Its length is about 11 km. It's about the same distance to the city center. It turns out that you have to walk at least 22 km, maybe more. After all, today's Nevsky district was at that time part of the Shlisselburg district of the region, many industries were located there. And Kolpino? This is still the area. St. Petersburg is approximately 30 km away. Or more. That is, how much did people believe in the king’s mercy that in such a cold and dark time they went to the city on foot. And Gapon convinced them of this
    1. +1
      20 October 2023 00: 20
      It was not Gapon who convinced them, but the hope that the tsar would help improve the bestial condition of the workers.
      1. 0
        20 October 2023 09: 11
        Quote: Jager
        It was not Gapon who convinced them, but the hope that the tsar would help improve the bestial condition of the workers.

        Yes, I thought about despair and a hopeless insoluble situation, but I didn’t know how to say it
  21. +3
    19 October 2023 23: 41
    “The Russia that we lost” in 1917, and was almost “found” after Yeltsin was elected president of Russia
    Lest the current “find” turn out to be worse for us than the previous one...
  22. +3
    20 October 2023 00: 18
    By the way, at the Golutvin station on the square in front of the station there is a monument to the execution of workers, and on the wall of the station there is a memorial plaque with the names of those killed.
    Kolomna at that time was a major industrial center due to the presence of the Kolomna plant (still existing) with a large number of workers.
    Unfortunately, it is not possible to assess Gapon’s figure impartially now due to the fact that he was not unequivocally assessed during his lifetime. And more than 100 years later...

    I thank the author for the interesting material! drinks
  23. Des
    +2
    20 October 2023 07: 24
    I haven’t read here with such interest for a long time).
    “Rutenberg allegedly did not take part directly in the murder - he went downstairs. At the time of his death, Gapon was only 36 years old.” Yes, only 36 years old. I hate Gapon as a provocateur, but even more so as N2, as a stupid sovereign (fool).
  24. -1
    20 October 2023 08: 21
    Well, yes, peaceful demonstrators who only wanted to bow to the Tsar-Father, but for some reason forgot that processions were not allowed.
    From different sides, 150 thousand people with unclear goals, whose leadership received a ban on the procession, walked in the direction of the king's palace.
    What were they waiting for, I wonder? That they will be greeted with flowers?

    They were shot at, but they still walked forward peacefully. And it’s described as something like a peaceful protest. :)

    Let me also remind you that on October 25-27, 1917, similar events ended in a coup.
    Georgy Gapon is a provocateur who led hundreds of people to their deaths. It doesn't matter what his goals were. It all ended with the collapse of the Russian Empire.
    1. +1
      21 October 2023 16: 37
      Quote: Denis812
      From different sides, 150 thousand people with unclear goals, whose leadership received a ban on the procession, walked in the direction of the king's palace.
      What were they waiting for, I wonder? That they will be greeted with flowers?

      The Russian state system very thoughtfully and talentedly keeps the people in obedience. However, over time, this leads to the fact that unprincipled people gather in the leadership and begin to squabble among themselves for resources (they have nothing to take from a poor worker or engineer). At the end of the 19th century, the tsarist secret police relied on the creation of pseudo-revolutionary organizations into the leadership of which the secret police introduced its agents provocateurs. In Stalin's history textbooks it is directly and simply written that this idyll of power, secret police, and well-fed revolutionaries ended when there was a strike at a factory with French capital in Russia. The owners of the plant told the authorities that they would pay money either to the workers or to the authorities. If the government wants to have the same dividends, it must disperse or at least rein in the “nashi” of that time. What was and was done by the authorities. But as a result, the Russian Revolution occurred and the French and the autocracy were left without dividends from the plant nationalized by Lenin. Although something more dangerous for the authorities happens when the elite believes that it is necessary to reduce spending on the army and security forces and lie under the control of a foreign state. Then the elite is simply destroyed or expelled, as was the case in the national republics in 1991. Under Putin, it turned out that cultural and sports figures, called upon to be a soft force in governing the people, were the first to betray him.
  25. -1
    20 October 2023 08: 26
    Georgy Gapon, who became a victim of Rutenberg and Azef, who really could be one of the great figures of the Russian Revolution, still officially bears the undeserved stigma of a bloody provocateur.

    And here is what the well-known B.V. Savinkov writes in his book “Memoirs of a Terrorist”:
    Having decided to kill Gapon alone, he (Rutenberg) invited him to a pre-filmed dacha in Ozerki, ostensibly for final negotiations about his decision to join the police. Rutenberg gathered several workers, personally well known to him, party members, some of whom went with Gapon on January 9, and told them all his conversations with Gapon. The workers didn't believe it at first. Rutenberg invited them to verify the veracity of his words and only then proceed with the murder. One of these workers was waiting for Gapon at Rutenberg at the station. Ozerki is like a cab driver. While they were driving to the dacha, he, sitting on the box, heard the entire conversation between Gapon and Rutenberg and became convinced that Gapon was really inviting Rutenberg to join the police service. The same thing happened at the dacha. In an empty room, behind a closed door, several workers heard Rutenberg talking to Gapon. Gapon never spoke as cynically as he did this time. At the end of the conversation, Rutenberg suddenly opened the door and let the workers in. Despite Gapon's pleas, the workers immediately hung him on a hanger hook.
    https://www.livelib.ru/quote/44938486-vospominaniya-terrorista-boris-savinkov

    So Gapon deservedly bears the label of a provocateur.
    1. +1
      20 October 2023 10: 55
      The article clearly states that all this evidence has one source - the “word of honor” of Rutenberg himself, who tried to present himself in this situation not as the leader of a gang of criminals, but as an ideological killer. But you and I are not British gentlemen! And not even Putin - to take his word for it like that. And Dmitry-Richard’s commentary contains quotes from the memoirs of another killer, who claims that Gapon was simply “killed” without asking him a single question. Read more carefully.
      1. -2
        20 October 2023 12: 55
        Read more carefully.

        I believe Savinkov’s memoirs more than the opinions and conclusions of the author of the article.
        ps And please don’t be rude, giving stupid advice on how to read all sorts of dubious opuses. Mr. Ryzhov V.A. is not the Strugatsky Brothers at all, so his “creativity” should be carefully studied.
        1. -2
          20 October 2023 13: 28
          It looks like you shouldn’t believe Savinkov’s memoirs. Because he was not present during the murder of Gapon and writes everything from Rutenberg’s words. But Rutenberg did not take into account that one of the killers would also leave memories. And there - just murder. No one spoke to Gapon, no one eavesdropped. They simply “carried out the sentence.” I hope Dmitry won’t be offended if I post the quote he gave again:
          Gapon did not make excuses and did not say anything at all for a banal reason - leaving the room, he ran into Comrade at the door. Grigory (Yur. Prokopov). He was not taken aback, grabbed a liter ladle from a tub of water and hit Gapon in the face with it. Gapon fell, losing consciousness. Comrades who jumped out from the next room grabbed Gapon, tied him up, and threw a noose over him. Comrade Martyn (Ptr. Rutenberg) brought him to his senses with slaps and read out the verdict of the Party. After which the loop was tightened, tying it to the hanger. When the body stopped twitching, we threw a coat from the closet over it (sic), drank on the terrace, smoked and went our separate ways..
          1. 0
            20 October 2023 14: 18
            It looks like you shouldn’t believe Savinkov’s memoirs. ... He was not present and writes everything from Rutenberg’s words.

            You so confidently refute Savinkov’s memoirs that you were probably present at the same time. I'm looking forward to your memoirs with your version. love
  26. -1
    21 October 2023 08: 05
    ... Hm..
    Quite sad. As always, proclamations, processions, beatings. Tsar Father Savior...
    As a result, the death of naive ordinary people.
    From the recent one, there were also white ribbons on the lapel and there were also bits, cameras, and then the stage.
    The question arises, is this a pattern or heredity?
    And what is more present here, faith in the king as a savior or the inferiority of education and mentality?
  27. -1
    23 October 2023 22: 01
    By the way, does this situation with Gapon remind you of anything?

    “March of Justice”, shelling of him by the Russian Armed Forces, Prigozhin himself not as a Pop, but as Putin’s Cook, his three Hero Stars, cooperation with security forces in Russia and abroad, and his death under strange circumstances...
    The disappearance of some of the characters, the sledgehammer, and...... the king is the king, with boyars and princes
  28. The comment was deleted.