Ancient German military ethics as the source of the code of honor of knights of the Middle Ages

87
Ancient German military ethics as the source of the code of honor of knights of the Middle Ages

Chivalry is inextricably linked both with the world of wars and mounted warriors, and with the concept of “aristocracy,” for knights were usually people of noble birth. British historian Maurice Keane notes that chivalry can be defined as a certain ethos in which military, aristocratic and religious components are fused together [1]. Chivalry denoted the code and culture of the military class, which regarded war as its hereditary profession.

One of the features of Western European chivalry is that military craft became the subject of intense ideological exaltation - there was simply no “way to the top” for knights who knew no other career than the military. For this reason, the elements of war brought professional warriors not only inevitable suffering and hardship, but also significant opportunities for advancement up the social ladder. War turned for them into the main or even the only means of self-realization from childhood until the end of their lives [2].



In science, there is an opinion that the main sources of the political and legal culture of the Middle Ages were, firstly, Roman law, which retained its enormous authority, and, secondly, canon law, based on Christian dogma. However, we should not forget about the most important source - the ancient Germanic military traditions with their emphasis on personal freedom and the dignity of the armed man (“the law of the sword” and custom, as opposed to the “written law”). The culture of chivalry as the socially dominant class of the Middle Ages was based precisely on the law of custom [3].

Some researchers rightly note that the most important for knightly ideology were the pagan traditions of the ancient Germans. After all, the idea of ​​chivalry originates from the traditions of German tribal formations of the era of military democracy.

In this material we will consider issues related to the origin of knightly ideology, knightly virtues and their connection with ancient German military ethics.

About the knight's code of honor



Chivalry is essentially a secular, war-oriented upper-class code of honor. He owed his Christian motives to the fact that these social groups operated within the emerging Christian society, where the Christian cult was the basis of social and religious life. Chivalry flourished from the mid-1th to the mid-XNUMXth centuries as the ethos of the dominant secular class of Christian Europe, and its characteristic external forms corresponded to the social, political and cultural conditions of those times [XNUMX].

Chivalry - as described in medieval treatises - is a specific way of life in which we can distinguish three main aspects: military, aristocratic and religious. The aristocratic aspect of chivalry is not just about birth; it is associated with the most important function of chivalry and that scale of values, according to which nobility primarily depends on the self-worth of a person, and not just on his birth [1].

The “Knight’s Code of Honor” is a special phenomenon in European culture that arose in the XNUMXth century. Truly knightly virtues, in Old French called “largesse” (conventionally “breadth of soul”) and “courtoisie” (“courtiness”), were considered military valor, a sense of honor, loyalty, moderation and generosity. The code of knightly honor also assumed loyalty to one's word as an immutable rule of conduct. Knightly communities, grouped into orders and brotherhoods, conceptualized their group interests through the prism of the duty of fidelity to their word.

Military valor in the medieval sense was considered as

“the ability to rush, without hesitation, towards danger, while fighting according to all the rules of honor, without resorting to illegal techniques and tricks.”

The priority of “military valor” over other virtues in the “knight’s code of honor” was caused by the special relevance of military actions - the main sphere of manifestation of this quality at that time [5].

If a knight suddenly behaved unworthily, forgetting the chosen prototype and violating the code of honor, then he did not always get away with it. A special ritual of “demoting a knight” was practiced. French historian Michel Pastoureau writes about this, in particular. The one who had stained himself was elevated to the scaffold, placed astride a log, his head was doused with hot water to “wash away” the previous dedication, and weapon and the shield was broken and trampled underfoot. In this form, the ritual took shape by the beginning of the 6th century [XNUMX].

Maurice Kean notes that chivalry arose and was nurtured in France, but it found its final form in the pan-European context. It became widespread as a kind of unified ethos of the military class, identified, on the one hand, by the skill of mounted warriors, and on the other, by a combination of an extremely proud attitude towards one’s ancestors with the tradition of faithful service to one’s lord [1].

In French medieval literature of epic content, such knightly virtues as valor, loyalty, magnanimity and generosity were perceived as stereotypes of noble (knightly) behavior. However, these secular qualities already constitute the main features of the hero of more ancient German literature, the roots of which go back to the pre-Christian past. For example, these are the main virtues in the warrior society depicted in the Anglo-Saxon epic Beowulf.

The ethics of chivalry largely originated from the ancient German military ethics. It was precisely because of the ancient and deep-rooted military dream of glory and recognition that no sermons or religious teachings could bring down the military fervor characteristic of the ideal knight, for, as Tacitus said when he wrote about the ancient Germans and their thirst for battle, “renown is easiest won among perils” (“glory is easiest to achieve in times of danger”) [Tacitus, Germania].

German military traditions as the source of chivalry



Not only XNUMXth-century books on the Middle Ages and chivalry, but even major recent studies, such as the works of Franco Cardini and Jean Flory, begin with or do not ignore ancient Germany. This is not surprising, since it was German society that foreshadowed medieval chivalry.

Russian historian, specialist in the field of Scandinavian studies Alexander Khlevov notes that numerous facts suggest that the Germanic tribes, going through a stage of development characteristic of all early societies, colored it with their own flavor: a pronounced idealization of war and exaggerated attention to it. The given vector will later be reflected in the phenomenon of medieval European chivalry [4].

Early Germanic society was characterized by a strict ethical code that valued trust, loyalty, and courage above all else. Fame in ancient Germanic society was an absolute value, and life without honor for the ancient Germans was simply unthinkable.

“It is shameful for a leader to be inferior to someone in valor, and it is shameful for a squad not to be like its leader in valor. And to emerge alive from a battle in which a leader fell is dishonor and shame for life [7],”

- Tacitus wrote about the customs of the ancient Germans. It was in this that German society differed from the Roman Empire and anticipated medieval chivalry. The incentive for everyone was honor.

The main source of honor and glory for the ancient Germans was war. In German customs, as Franco Cardini notes, it is sacred. The god of war Wotan (Odin) exists surrounded by a squad (Gefolg-schaft) - a retinue of valiant men. Like him, the German leader, who has earned his authority through valor, strives to imitate the divine example in everything and is looking for worthy comrades for his retinue [8].

Terms such as “valor” (virtus) or even “audacity”, “fearlessness” (audacia) - a word, we note, is much stronger - are not sufficient to convey the spirit with which the Celt and German fought in antiquity or the early Middle Ages [ 8].

In the imagination of the German warrior, who acquires strength and aggressiveness thanks to initiation, connected through it by indissoluble bonds with warriors and illustrious leaders like himself, joining a military family based on valor and a common destiny, brotherhood and identity with formerly strangers blood, coexists with natural ties of clan [8].

Among the Germans, thanks to joining a fighting squad, an almost consanguineous relationship was established between its leader and ordinary members. The warriors who were part of such a detachment had every right to maintain order in the possessions of their commander, as if they belonged to his family; in the same way, he had the right to restore order and dispose of the households of those whom he armed and took into maintenance, and from their killers he demanded payment of a blood debt, wergeld, according to the rate that corresponded to his own status, and not the killed warriors from his squads - everything is again as if the members of the squad were his relatives. We find similar views in chivalry [1].

Scandinavians went on Viking campaigns to gain fame, to remain in the memory of their descendants, and also to increase their social status. The Saga of Harald Graypelt, for example, says:

“Harald was a very valiant man. One man in Sweden was called Tosti, he was in that country the most powerful and noble man of those who was not a king or jarl. He was very warlike and constantly went on campaigns. He was nicknamed Skoglar-Tosti. Harald the Greenlander joined Tosti and went with him on a Viking campaign in the summer, and showed his valor [9].”

As for chivalry, the necessary attributes of an ideal knight were also a thirst for exploits, conquests, victories, a desire for glory and daring, bordering on recklessness. The war for chivalry also had a religious connotation, with the only difference being that the ancient pagan religion was replaced by Christianity.

For the ancient Germans, youth was a time of trials, searches and attempts by a young warrior to prove what he was capable of. This is reflected, for example, in Beowulf, as well as in Germanic epic poems of the 1th-XNUMXth centuries written in Latin, for example, in Ruodlieb and Waltharius. Subsequently, this theme is found in later works - chivalric romances - where young knights leave their home (or the court of King Arthur) in order to prove their knightly worth during unprecedented adventures [XNUMX].

Many knightly traditions - such as, for example, the consecration of swords - also have ancient roots associated with the distant pre-Christian past and the traditions of the ancient Germans. Thus, the sword of Roland Durendal has its counterpart in the German-Scandinavian “Walder” (X-XI centuries) in the form of the Mimming sword, forged by the great blacksmith of the German-Scandinavian pantheon Wieland. And the relics enclosed in the hilt of Durendal (the tooth of St. Peter, the hair of St. Dionysius, a piece of clothing of the Virgin Mary) have their analogue in the Scandinavian magical “stones of life” embedded in the hilts of pagan swords [1].

Thus, the emergence of the knightly mentality is in one way or another connected with the ancient German military tradition, the German code of heroic values.

Conclusions


So, knightly culture has its roots, on the one hand, in the depths of self-awareness of the ancient Germanic peoples with their cult of the leader, personal loyalty and military valor, and on the other hand, in the concept of service developed by Christianity.

The ideal of devotion to a lord in war undoubtedly came from the German squads, but veneration of a superior and ardent devotion became the norm of all social life, a norm that was sanctified by Christian morality. All this limited, first of all, the unbridled “knightly” free will [10]. The rider was required not so much to distinguish himself in war, but to serve, which was unusual for the freedom-loving Germans.

German comitat - squads bound to the leader by an oath of allegiance - which one could join thanks to the glory gained in battle by one's ancestors and which were brotherhoods in arms, were the living soul of the knightly Middle Ages. Shall we take the epic example of Roland-Olivier or historical evidence from the times of the Crusades, the complementarity of brothers in arms is so important that it can be argued: the specific embodiment of the ideal of a perfect knight was most often found not in one individual hero, but in a pair of them, where they are united by weapons [8].

Based on the foregoing, we can conclude that the idea of ​​chivalry originates primarily from the ancient German and Celtic principles of military democracy, built on the principles of a free armed man, as the social basis of society.

In conclusion, it should also be noted that the special attitude of the ancient Germans to weapons was also subsequently reflected in chivalry. In particular, historian A. Khlevov notes the following:

“The warrior loved his weapon, trusted it, called it by a bright and sonorous name, expecting help in battle, probably, first of all, from the weapon itself, and secondarily from the deity responsible for military success. In this context, a direct continuation of this tradition of animation is the knightly custom of giving proper names to swords, spears and other weapons. It, like many other features of classical European chivalry, is rooted precisely in the German tradition of the pagan period [11].”

Использованная литература:
[1]. Maurice Keene. Chivalry. – M.: Scientific world, 2000.
[2]. Orlova E.I. “Education by service” in the knightly culture of the European Middle Ages. // News of the Volgograd Pedagogical University. Series “Socio-economic sciences and art”. 2009. No. 8(42). P.8-12.
[3]. Karpovsky A. S. Subculture of chivalry in the context of the political and legal culture of Medieval Europe: dis. Ph.D. cultural studies, Moscow. state University of Culture and Arts. – M., 2003.
[4]. Quote from: Khlevov A.A. A brief history of the Middle Ages: Epoch, states, battles, people - St. Petersburg: Amphora, 2008
[5]. Manukhina A.O. “Reflection of the “knight’s code of honor” in the medieval discourse of the Crusades. [Electronic resource] URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/otrazhenie-kodeksa-chesti-rytsarya-v-srednevekovom-diskurse-epohi-krestovyh-pohodov-na-materiale-starofrantsuzskih-dokumentalnyh
[6]. Pastoureau M.P. Everyday life in France and England during the time of the Knights of the Round Table / trans. from fr. M. O. Gonchar; scientific ed., comment. and after. T. D. Sergeeva; preface A. P. Levandovsky. – M.: Young Guard, 2009.
[7]. Cornelius Tacitus. Works in two volumes. Volume I. “Annals. Small works." Scientific-ed. Center "Ladomir", M., 1993.
[8]. Cardini F. Origins of medieval chivalry. – M, Progress, 1987.
[9]. The Saga of Harald Gray Skin // Sturluson S. Circle of the Earth - M.: Nauka, 1980.
[10]. Barthelemy D. Chivalry from ancient Germany to France of the 2012th century. St. Petersburg: Eurasia, XNUMX.
[eleven]. Khlevov A. A. Harbingers of the Vikings. Northern Europe in the 11st–2019th centuries. – St. Petersburg: Eurasia, XNUMX.
87 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    16 October 2023 05: 14
    knightly culture has its roots, on the one hand, in the depths of self-awareness of the ancient Germanic peoples with their cult of the leader
    Other peoples did not have such a culture, therefore they were barbarians, not noble.. smile
    1. +21
      16 October 2023 05: 24
      Alexey agrees - every sandpiper praises its swamp!
      The role of “German culture” in the emergence of chivalry as such is greatly exaggerated by the Author. The most ancient sources “The Song of the Nebelungs”, the oral sagas of the Scandinavians say the opposite - steal, deceive, kill in the back!!!
      A textbook example of “knightly behavior” from the history of the birth of the Frankish state is the case of the vase.
      Good day to everyone, Kote!
      1. +16
        16 October 2023 05: 48
        Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
        steal, deceive, kill in the back!!!
        ...the incident with the vase

        There is another example nobility - Theodoric kills the ruler of Italy, Odoacer, at a feast, who was specially invited there for the sake of example and friendship...
        1. +10
          16 October 2023 07: 18
          Quote from Korsar4
          There is another example of nobility - Theodoric kills the ruler of Italy Odoacer at a feast,

          If the goal is noble, any action is justified!
          1. +4
            16 October 2023 13: 53
            Q. Be careful with conclusions “if the goal is noble”, where is the measure of nobility?
            Here, you know, it’s very slippery: it’s not for nothing that it’s said: “The road to hell is paved with good intentions.”
            The last example: Hamas has put Israel on its back. If the IDF moves back, it will not be clearly understood. Both in Israel and abroad the reaction will be unusual.
            That's what my sofa thinks
        2. +8
          16 October 2023 09: 30
          The Hattic leader Adgandestrius proposed that the Romans poison Arminius, and his letter with this proposal was read in the Senate, but Emperor Tiberius refused to sanction the insidious murder, answering that “the Roman people take revenge on their enemies, not by resorting to deception, and not by secret means, but openly and by force weapons." In 21, Arminius was killed by his entourage[7]; according to Tacitus - Segestes, the father of his wife Thusnelda

          Well - and which of them is noble, German or Roman?
        3. +3
          16 October 2023 13: 56
          “for the sake of example and friendship” it doesn’t matter “friendship” with such “friendship” and enemies don’t care
      2. +3
        16 October 2023 13: 30
        Namesake, good day. My sofa whispers that the author, one of the “Germans”, praises them very much
    2. +6
      16 October 2023 06: 27
      Everything is simple here, if a warrior is endowed with armor, weapons and a war horse, then he will cause a lot of trouble, so you need to put him in a framework, that is, come up with a code of honor for him and so on. The Japanese invented Bushido (the way of the warrior) for samurai. But as soon as firearms appeared, no one needed these knights with their codes. Saveldra showed this perfectly in Don Quixote, even moreover, the knight turned into a laughing stock. Kurosawa in “Seven Samurai” also showed the uselessness of knights (samurai), except to protect the peasants for rice soup. That's the whole philosophy of chivalry. what
      1. +3
        16 October 2023 10: 12
        Did you exclude Cervantes from the authors?
    3. +3
      16 October 2023 07: 19
      Quote: parusnik
      other peoples

      Which ones?
  2. +5
    16 October 2023 05: 27
    I liked the story with the “disgrace of the knight”.

    When we wash our hair with hot water, don’t we lose anything? However, there are not many alternatives.
  3. +9
    16 October 2023 05: 54
    the author tediously repeats himself in his praise of the heirs of the barbarians. There was already an article of his about, they say, nobility as the cornerstone of all ancient Germanic culture. Only there, as far as I remember, he praised the Scandinavians.
  4. +6
    16 October 2023 06: 20
    Knight is a corruption of the German Ritter, which literally means "horseman". The French Chevalier also literally translates as “horseman,” as does the Spanish Caballero. Thus, horsemen were an aristocratic class back in ancient Rome; in particular, the horseman was the procurator of Judea, Pontius Pilate. And in Greek Athens, although there was democracy and universal military service, the horsemen were very wealthy citizens. Not surprising - maintaining a horse was not cheap. And on the opposite side of the world, in Japan, samurai were mounted warriors and at the same time a hereditary elite, a noble class. So German traditions played some role in the development of knighthood, but the main reason for the emergence of knighthood was the state’s need for a cavalry army. In Switzerland they spoke German, but there was no cavalry, and there was no noble class, although both Germany and France with a developed noble class are nearby, beyond the pass.
    1. 0
      17 October 2023 02: 44
      Quote: Nagan
      Knight is a corruption of the German Ritter, which literally means "horseman".
      And on the opposite side of the world, in Japan, samurai were mounted warriors and at the same time a hereditary elite, a noble class...
      A samurai is not always “on horseback” - Samurai is right wield a sword...
      Unlike the peasant, who It was forbidden to have bladed weapons.
      В era of the "warring states" becoming a samurai was quite simple - you needed people ready to fight - to make up for losses in previous battles.
      In the era of the “reign of the shoguns,” it was almost impossible to become a samurai without being born into a samurai family - there were no free places left...
      A. Kurosawa's films show a lot "horseless" samurai who wandered around Yamato (Japan) in search of food - all the land was divided between large landowners who hired "landless" samurai to work.
  5. +13
    16 October 2023 06: 26
    When F. Cardini proposed his complex theory that the source of chivalry were their barbarian predecessors, it looked fresh, relevant, and interesting. Although even then, in the 80s of the twentieth century, most historians pointed out the problems and shortcomings associated with such a straightforward interpretation.
    Today, 40 years later, this is not relevant at all: of course, the influence is unconditional, the traits are similar, the leaders turned into kings and counts, but this is not what determined the development: the squad, unlike the knight, are completely different social institutions that arose on different soils and for different reasons.
    hi
    1. +6
      16 October 2023 07: 15
      Quote: Eduard Vaschenko
      different social institutions

      But there is no doubt that “German military and aristocratic views” played a role. Here Cardini essentially did not discover anything new.
  6. +6
    16 October 2023 06: 46
    A wonderful article that reveals one of the versions of the origin of the cult of chivalry. Which, however, was also doused with slop by Cervantes. Because in practice everything was a little different...
    1. +5
      16 October 2023 06: 59
      But I would not criticize Cervantes indiscriminately. The book is brilliant. And Don Quixote's reasoning is wise. Only they are not addressed to those who can hear.

      By the way, I really like the way Kamburova sings in the film about Dulcinea.
      1. +5
        16 October 2023 07: 11
        But I would not criticize Cervantes indiscriminately.
        Where do I criticize him????
        1. +6
          16 October 2023 07: 39
          Which, however, was also doused with slop by Cervantes.


          Is this encouragement or criticism?
          1. +10
            16 October 2023 08: 15
            How can I criticize Lepanto's hero??? True, then he was put in prison for embezzlement... It’s an amazing thing, great writers grow out of unlucky tax collectors: Matthew, Cervantes, O. Henry...
            1. +6
              16 October 2023 08: 30
              There was time to think. And distractions were limited.

              Baron Muchausen from the film was able to appreciate this.
          2. +2
            16 October 2023 10: 23
            Is this encouragement or criticism?
            Excuse me, but when they criticize, do they smear honey on their lips? smile
            1. +3
              16 October 2023 11: 02
              Wasps and bees can flock to honey.

              I know how flies land on honey,
              I know death that prowls, destroying everything,
              I know books, truths and rumors,
              I know everything, but not myself.
    2. +6
      16 October 2023 07: 11
      Quote: 3x3zsave
      A wonderful article that reveals one of the versions of the origin of the cult of chivalry. Which, however, was also doused with slop by Cervantes. Because in practice everything was a little different...

      I can’t help but support you, Anton, although I’ve already written my comment. Very well written. Moreover, it gives me reason to return to the medieval topic in the near future and write a “response”. In which there will be something that is not included here.
      1. +4
        16 October 2023 07: 22
        Hello, Vyacheslav Olegovich! I'll be happy to criticize!
    3. +6
      16 October 2023 10: 28
      Which, however, was also doused with slop by Cervantes. Because in practice everything was a little different...

      Hello Anton!
      Cervantes was right because he wrote in the era of the fall of chivalry, and his work was in tune with the “collective unconscious”, which would not have been possible in earlier periods, both the beginning and the dawn of chivalry as a system.
      hi
    4. +8
      16 October 2023 10: 40
      Cervantes also doused him with slop. Because in practice everything was a little different...


      We should not confuse chivalry with the feudal system. The feudal system can be called the real life of the period we are talking about, which has its advantages and disadvantages, its merits and its vices. Chivalry, on the contrary, represents the ideal world as it existed in the imagination of novelists...The more closely we look at history, the more clearly we understand that the system of chivalry is almost entirely a poetic invention.

      Sismondi, Jean Charles Leonard de (1885–88). Historical perspective on the literature of southern Europe
  7. +8
    16 October 2023 07: 08
    Where did the ethics of chivalry in the Middle Ages originate?
    Answer to the question from the preview: from the Aquitaine poetic culture. And no more.
  8. +6
    16 October 2023 07: 10
    Dear Victor! Congratulations! Very good stuff. I read it with pleasure. It’s nice that you grow such good “plants” in “my medieval field” (just kidding).
  9. +11
    16 October 2023 07: 20
    All this is Walterscottism. In fact, these bright-minded people were just like other despicable people. Behavior was ruled by self-interest, right, power and lust. They wrinkled their butts among themselves, but even then strictly in accordance with the “color differentiation of the states.” Yes, they were pros in war, because this is their bread. They lived by war, and those with higher political positions in their orders fought in rapprochements in between, or even worse, in tournaments. And the Arthurs, Siegfrieds and Rolands are so, what they wanted to seem, but what they were not. A kind of self-justifying self-deception
    1. +1
      16 October 2023 09: 48
      Don't judge everyone by yourself. There have, of course, been plenty of unprincipled and greedy people at all times, but from an ethical point of view, comparisons between knighthood/nobility on the one hand and modern elites/military command on the other, modernity looks, to put it mildly, very unsightly. In the same France, the nobility at the beginning of the XNUMXth century made up a third of the entire army, all command positions were occupied by nobles. It was, first of all, a military class, which had a number of functions. And they had ideas about honor.

      For example, in 1502, Pierre de Teray, Lord Bayard, a famous knight, was appointed commandant of the fortress of Minervino (this was the period of the Italian Wars). During one of his forays, he captured the Spanish lord Alonso de Soto Mayor. While waiting for the ransom, Bayar offered Soto-Mayor, on his word of honor, complete freedom of action in the fortress, which he took advantage of to attempt an escape (after which he was already kept under lock and key). Subsequently, Alonso de Soto Mayor explained this by saying that he was allegedly treated poorly, after which Bayard challenged him to a duel for libel. It is noteworthy in this story that the prisoner was given freedom at a military facility on his word of honor - in those days it meant much more than it does now.
      1. +8
        16 October 2023 10: 40
        However, from an ethical point of view, comparisons between knighthood/nobility on the one hand and modern elites/military command on the other, modernity looks, to put it mildly, very unsightly.

        Good afternoon,
        Without arguing with your right to express any conclusions and opinions, I would like to note that such a comparison, from a scientific point of view, is not appropriate. Thus, I do not want to justify any of the “managers”.
        But one could compare their “nobility” in relation to their own serfs and other rabble, getting tangled under the feet of their horses laughing
        The current “elite” needs to manage in a complex and very stratified society, where “every gopher is an agronomist”, during a period of material saturation (the majority have toilets that Louis XIV never dreamed of), which cannot be said about feudalism.
        hi
      2. +7
        16 October 2023 12: 42
        However, from an ethical point of view, comparisons between knighthood/nobility on the one hand and modern elites/military command on the other, modernity looks, to put it mildly, very unsightly

        And from the point of view of what ethics will you compare the medieval nobility and modern elites and their approach to jus in bello? What macro position will your choice be based on - realism, militarism, pacifism, pluralism? Depending on the choice, the results of the comparison may be diametrically opposed.
      3. +2
        16 October 2023 15: 44
        Quote: Viktor Biryukov
        And they had ideas about honor.
        are you serious now?!!!!
        it was all for show, but in real life they poisoned each other, framed each other, raped and killed
  10. +6
    16 October 2023 08: 00
    So, knightly culture has its roots, on the one hand, in the depths of self-awareness of the ancient Germanic peoples with their cult of the leader, personal loyalty and military valor, and on the other hand, in the concept of service developed by Christianity.
    Let's clarify, European knightly culture. If we turn to the epics of other nations, in principle we will find everything the same, but with our own national flavor. And you don’t have to go far, just turn to the Slavic epics about various heroes.
    1. +7
      16 October 2023 08: 48
      Let's clarify, European knightly culture. If we turn to the epics of other nations, in principle we will find everything the same, but with our own national flavor. And you don’t have to go far, just turn to the Slavic epics about various heroes.

      Agree. “The Sturmbannführer also wanted to, but the Junta managed to do it earlier.” (c) drinks
      1. +4
        16 October 2023 09: 46
        You know, even if you take the Ossetian epic about the Narts, not adapted for children, but for an adult audience, for example, there is also a local “Grail”, but here it is not a cup, but millet, which the giant stole and the Narts are trying to get it - knights, but success accompanies only one. I don’t remember all the twists and turns, but there are a lot of similarities
    2. +5
      16 October 2023 13: 19
      And you don’t have to go far, just turn to the Slavic epic about various heroes.

      Here you really don’t have to go far, only the French epic about heroes was written down in the XNUMXth century, and the Russian one in the XNUMXth century.
      1. +3
        16 October 2023 17: 45
        Quote from Frettaskyrandi
        and Russian - in the XVII.

        But isn't it at 19?
  11. +3
    16 October 2023 09: 24
    Based on archaeological finds, it is possible to draw a chain of events that indicate that the Frankish state, after the conquest of Europe, contributed to the distribution and improvement of the weapons and armor of warriors.
    1. 0
      15 December 2023 04: 50
      armor of warriors.

      What is this Internet slang for? Warriors
  12. +5
    16 October 2023 10: 09
    The article is the most ordinary idealistic garbage. Judge for yourself, but what kind of fidelity to one’s word can one talk about in relation to the feudal lords? Just remember Truchses or Karl the Evil. Another example is the execution of the herald-envoy by Karl the Bold. Rare scum. It’s not for nothing that the Swiss didn’t even take this scum into the logs .
  13. +2
    16 October 2023 10: 27
    The code of any military class is the same in all countries: kill or be killed.
  14. +4
    16 October 2023 10: 36
    Ancient German military ethics as the source of the code of honor of knights of the Middle Ages

    This is a categorical statement right away, although it has already been proven many times that in relation to historical processes such categoricalness is not the best approach.
    Naturally, the cultural traditions of the Germanic tribes, which formed the basis in the ethnogenesis of Western European peoples: Germans, French, Dutch, Flemings, Danes, Swedes, Norwegians and others, could not help but exert their influence, but reduce the formation of such a cultural imperative as a code of honor it is not worthwhile to resort to such a primitive process as the author does.
    Perhaps it would be worth starting here not with Maurice Kean, but with Pierre Bourdieu and his theory of habitus.
  15. +5
    16 October 2023 11: 42
    Hmmm! The author's "Russian language" is terrible. God be with them, with commas, but some sentences are simply impossible to understand!
    Usually this is written by people who read very little.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  16. +1
    16 October 2023 12: 31
    reverence for a superior and ardent devotion became the norm of all social life, a norm that was sanctified by Christian morality. All this limited, first of all, the unbridled “knightly” free will [10]. The rider was required not so much to distinguish himself in war, but to serve,

    Christian morality was rather used to sanctify the necessary qualities for service on which feudal society was based. Christian morality itself in its original version is not very tailored to this service.
  17. +7
    16 October 2023 13: 06
    Good article, I liked it.
    It would probably be worth changing the title a little - “as one of the sources of the code of honor” - so more precisely, especially since the author mentions other sources. Otherwise, it is somehow automatically understood that ancient German military ethics was the main and almost the only source of the knightly code of honor. smile
    Regarding knighthood, I would like to note that this phenomenon in itself can be considered unique, purely European. Heavy spear cavalry is not a unique phenomenon, and chivalry is unique to Europe. What is different about a European knight from the XNUMXth to XNUMXth centuries? from a Russian warrior, an Egyptian Mamluk or a Byzantine clibanarius? If you just put them next to each other, it’s not a fact that you can tell who is who – the differences will be purely decorative. And yet, European chivalry is a unique phenomenon.
    However, in my opinion, what made it unique was not what the author writes about. The cult of the warrior, dating back to primitive times, was characteristic of any nation (at a certain stage of its development) and at the same time did not differ much in its content among different peoples. Strength (the ability to resolve any conflict by force), valor (the willingness to resolve any conflict by force), service (devotion to the leader, lord, overlord), the role of defender of the tax-paying population (read, “the well-being of the overlord and, as a consequence, one’s own), generosity (wealth came so easily, it should have gone away so easily.) What else?
    In one ratio or another, such qualities were inherent in the elite military classes of almost any region and any time - the ancient Turks, Arabs, Japanese, Chinese (we cannot say for sure about the Slavs), including the ancient Germans and Celts.
    So this ethics, of course, influenced the formation of the moral character of the European knight, but it did not make him unique in his own way; rather, on the contrary, it made him similar to “everyone else.” smile
    1. -1
      16 October 2023 13: 41
      And what is unique about the European knight?
      1. +6
        16 October 2023 15: 23
        Think for yourself.
        What is unique about the European knight, the Japanese samurai, the Egyptian Mamluk, the Mongolian keshig, the Byzantine clibanarius, the Russian warrior, and finally. What are the similarities, what are the differences...
        I don’t want to describe obvious things here, especially since the article partly gives the answer - if you think about it, of course.
        You are, after all, a reader...
        1. -3
          16 October 2023 20: 39
          There is no need to cast a shadow over the fence - the uniqueness of the Euroknight meant differences from other feudal lords who were not of European origin.
          1. +3
            16 October 2023 21: 44
            This is exactly what I suggested you think about. It's better than just wagging your tongue.
  18. +1
    16 October 2023 13: 14
    The leader of the squad probably did nothing but walk around and collect debts for the dead. crying
  19. +4
    16 October 2023 15: 30
    Comrades, dear, I’m making fun of the “Germans”, but for the sake of truth: in knightly times, there was a lot of positive things, namely, loyalty to the word, nobility towards the weak, and the longer humanity lives, the more vile it becomes.
    I remember school: 2 on 1 was mean, hitting a sick person - the answer is triple.
    I was in the second one, I was marked by 2. I brought a relative from the 8th. And everything is within the framework of our “concepts”. We once had a vile case: 2nd grade, a lame girl, her mother was swollen, “we considered it our duty to tease her. Once I deliberately pushed her so that she would fall from the porch, the answer was .... A 7th grader brought a guy who had served .You can imagine what he did with 3 idiots.Lastly, he forced him to start him and kiss his friend’s ass.
    There were no more similar cases.
    The “concepts” were cruel, but on the whole they were fair, but now it’s not the same.
    Or maybe I have old age grumbling?
    1. +1
      16 October 2023 15: 40
      Quote: vladcub
      : in knightly times, there were many positive things, namely loyalty to the word, nobility towards the weak

      Do you know the story of the mediocre King Richard the First - the lion's heart?!!
      so this was the norm, but all the courtliness and nobility are in books
  20. 0
    16 October 2023 15: 38
    the ability to rush, without hesitation, towards danger, while fighting according to all the rules of honor, without resorting to illegal techniques and tricks
    is this an article or a ladies' chivalric novel?!!!
    the author does not know how these “knights” sold, handed over and framed each other?!!!
    what the hell is honor?!!!
    drunk, trash and drunk, the main goal is to rob the weak and run away from the strong, which happened throughout Europe
    the neighbor is weakened, run to rob him, strengthened, lock yourself in the castle
    ugh, bullshit and not an article
    1. +8
      16 October 2023 16: 59
      Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
      drunken jerk and drunkard,

      You should say this to your face, Godefroy of Bouillon, the first to climb the wall of Jerusalem, John Talbot, the “British Achilles” who died in battle at the age of 69, for example, or Bertrand Du Guesclin, a rootless knight buried in the royal tomb.
      There are a few more characters you can name.
      As I understand it, when John the Good, released on parole, voluntarily returns to captivity, because the conditions of release were violated by his son, or Johann of Luxembourg goes into battle, although he himself no longer sees a damn thing, or when Richard III rushes into a hopeless attack , wanting to change the outcome of the battle with a duel - this is because they are drunken rags and drunks.
      Do you always treat everyone with the same brush?
      1. +4
        16 October 2023 17: 14
        I should say this to your face
        ... La Giru, just to be sure.
        1. +4
          16 October 2023 17: 30
          Hello Anton. smile

          ...La Ghiroux,

          In medieval France, where modern playing cards (“classical” or “French”) appeared around the XNUMXth century, “pictures” (cards with characters - kings, queens and jacks) were associated with certain historical or legendary characters. The Jack of Hearts corresponded to La Hire.

          I don’t really trust Wikpedia, but what do you think?
          1. +4
            16 October 2023 17: 36
            Hi Uncle Kostya!
            VikNik and I discussed this about a month and a half ago, when I also tried to appeal to information from Wiki. Well, in general, he “washed” me, as always. laughing
            1. +4
              16 October 2023 19: 43
              Well, everything has its pros and cons, at least if someone “washed” you, you don’t have to waste time on the bathhouse. wink
              1. +4
                16 October 2023 20: 21
                Sometimes a cold shower is enough
                1. +3
                  16 October 2023 20: 29
                  Unfortunately, it doesn't work for everyone. Others can only be dealt with with a bullet. Alas. I'm not bloodthirsty, you know. smile
          2. +5
            16 October 2023 18: 45
            In medieval France, where modern playing cards (“classical” or “French”) appeared around the XNUMXth century, “pictures” (cards with characters - kings, queens and jacks) were associated with certain historical or legendary characters. The Jack of Hearts corresponded to La Hire.

            French suits appeared at the end of the XNUMXth century. There is no documentary evidence of who and when designated the jack of hearts Lahire and whether this name is connected with the name La Hire.
            1. +4
              16 October 2023 22: 17
              Thanks, Vic.
              In general, that’s what I assumed, it’s too far-fetched.
      2. +7
        16 October 2023 17: 44
        Quote: Trilobite Master
        drunken jerk and drunkard,

        I should say this to your face

        Rvan is not bad either! All of them are in tattered sackcloth: laughing
        1. +6
          16 October 2023 17: 56
          Right! The neighbors in the tattered cotta didn't let me go further than the barbiken. laughing
        2. -2
          16 October 2023 17: 56
          Quote: Mihaylov
          Rvan is not bad either! All of them are in tattered sackcloth:

          kindergarten, can you give me some examples of Renaissance paintings?
      3. -3
        16 October 2023 17: 56
        Quote: Trilobite Master
        You should say this to your face, Godefroy of Bouillon, the first person to climb the wall of Jerusalem, John Talbot, the “British Achilles”, who died in battle at the age of 69, for example, or Bertrand

        ii? !!!!
        Well, he climbed up there, then what, didn’t he rape or rob anyone?
        Quote: Trilobite Master
        or when Richard III rushes into a hopeless attack, wanting to change the outcome of the battle with a duel - this is because they are drunken rags and drunks.

        there is no need to sing ballads and show off prettiness, they didn’t go there to protect children, but to rob, rape and kill
        1. +6
          16 October 2023 18: 11
          No one is going to sing anything to you! Stay with your opinion about the era, which, it must be said, is very poor.
          1. -4
            16 October 2023 18: 33
            Yes, not just wretched but real, you look at this era through the prism of films ala Ivanhoe
            and you’d better read Druon’s books, written after a lot of historical research, that’s where “nobility”, “honor” and “loyalty” are
            1. +5
              16 October 2023 19: 01
              you'd better read Druon's books
              Thank you very much for your valuable advice!
              I read Druon about 35 years ago; I have long been drawing information about the era not from fiction, but from available primary sources and the works of professional historians. Such as Johan Huizinga, Jean Favier, Jacques le Goff, Simone Roux, Ian Mortimer, Olga Togoeva... I can name a dozen more names offhand, but this is not available to you. Enjoy Druon!
              1. +6
                16 October 2023 19: 09
                Quote: 3x3zsave
                Thank you very much for your valuable advice!

                And most importantly, it is on a cosmic scale and cosmic..... drinks
                And you Legoff, LeGoff...
                1. +4
                  16 October 2023 19: 50
                  And most importantly, it is on a cosmic scale and cosmic.....
                  Nonsense. The same thing that I tried to convey to my opponent in other words.
                2. +3
                  16 October 2023 20: 12
                  No, what? "Le Goff" is a good wine, according to Geralt of Rivia!
              2. -2
                16 October 2023 23: 00
                Quote: 3x3zsave
                not from fiction

                Just for fun, read how the damned kings were created
                and as for the primary sources, don’t shake nonsense
                and if you don’t remind us about honor and nobility how Richard the first was captured, maybe you’ll tell us something about the right of the first night, or maybe you’ll tell us something about how the noble knights took Pskov?!!!!
        2. +4
          16 October 2023 22: 06
          Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
          didn’t rape or rob anyone?

          Personally? laughing
          It is quite possible that no one. The man was extremely decent...
          But for those words with which you deigned to characterize chivalry as a whole, and therefore him personally, I could give you a kick. And he would be right, by the way. smile
          Do you know cases when the war was done without violence and robbery?
          In general, with your knowledge and understanding of the Middle Ages, it would be more appropriate for you to remain silent or simply thank the author and some commentators for their science. Yes
          1. 0
            16 October 2023 23: 04
            I already realized that a society of pink ponies and reconstruction lovers had gathered here, knights were pooping soap bubbles, and some other nasty people were burning children in Pskov
            Quote: Trilobite Master
            Personally?

            who personally?!!!
            Who exactly are you talking about?
            1. +2
              17 October 2023 09: 48
              Children in Pskov were not burned and Pskov was not taken.
              If you are talking about the events of 1240-1242.
              The Pskovites entered into an alliance with the Livonian Germans.
      4. -2
        16 October 2023 23: 06
        Quote: Trilobite Master
        I should say this to your face, Godefroy of Bouillon, the first to climb the wall of Jerusalem

        The SS men in Koenigsberg showed miracles of courage and fought to the last, some while standing in the water of the Baltic Sea, SO WHAT?!!!!
  21. +2
    16 October 2023 15: 52
    Today's German knights are not the same...
  22. +2
    16 October 2023 19: 51
    Half a century ago, as far as I remember, in school textbooks they wrote that the eldest son inherited from the Germans. The rest had to look for a “living space” with the help of a sword. Well, the cross is an excellent justification for looking for a place where you can drink sweetly and eat heartily.
  23. The comment was deleted.
  24. +3
    16 October 2023 20: 45
    Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
    and you’d better read Druon’s books, written after a lot of historical research, that’s where “nobility”, “honor” and “loyalty” are

    Yes, here you don’t even need to read Druon - you can read the chroniclers of the 15th century...
  25. 0
    16 October 2023 20: 46
    Quote: 3x3zsave
    Such as Johan Huizinga, Jean Favier, Jacques le Goff, Simone Roux, Ian Mortimer, Olga Togoeva...

    As I understand it, these are all contemporaries of Talbot and Louis 13?
    1. +5
      16 October 2023 21: 19
      Communication with you does not provide any interesting information for me. Sorry.
  26. 0
    2 February 2024 18: 51
    From the article it is only clear that there was a culture of chivalry. But its essence is not completely revealed. The words “nobility” and “honor” were heard. But the meaning of these terms in the understanding of the knights themselves is not revealed. Apparently the reader must figure it out for himself...