Marina Mnishek. Trying to be Theodora

27
Marina Mnishek. Trying to be Theodora
Marina Mnishek in the painting by B. Zvorykin


В previous article we talked about the life of Marina Mnishek before the assassination of False Dmitry I. Her reign in Moscow lasted only 9 days, she miraculously escaped violence, or even death, and now two paths were open to her. She was about 18 years old, she could return to her homeland, get married again and live a long life as an ordinary “noble lady.”



And, since she had gone through the coronation procedure, she had the right to continue to call herself the Moscow Tsarina - albeit a dowager. But Marina decided to fight for the Moscow throne, ultimately destroying herself and her son, as well as many people who considered her the rightful queen. In Mussorgsky's opera Boris Godunov, Marina Mnishek says:

“A whole host of princes and counts,
And noble lords
It won't relieve hellish boredom...
Panne Mniszech is too boring
A languid outpouring of passion,
Ardent youths praying,
Vulgar speeches of tycoons.
Panna Mniszech wants fame
Panna Mniszech thirsts for power!
To the throne of the kings of Moscow
I will sit as queen
And in gold-woven purple
I'm shining with the sun.
And I will slay you with wonderful beauty
I am the stupid Muscovites,
And herds of arrogant boyars
I'll force you to hit me with your forehead.
And they will be glorified in fairy tales,
Tales, fables
I'm proud of my queen
Stupid boyars!

Marina Tsvetaeva wrote about her:

“The wife of three Impostors,
Mishka the arrogant daughter...
Damn you, damn you
You are the False Dmitry who could be the False Marina!”

We will talk about this in today's article.

False Dmitry II


So, already on May 19 (29), 1606, a new tsar, Vasily Shuisky, was “called out” (elected) in Moscow. His coronation took place on June 1 (11) of the same year.

On June 9, Jerzy Mniszek appeared before the boyars, who had recently solemnly welcomed “Tsarevich Dmitry”, and now hypocritically accused him of bringing a “traitor and impostor” to Moscow. In August 1606, he, his daughter Marina and 375 retinue, who were allowed to take with them weapon, were sent to Yaroslavl. Here they were treated quite kindly and they did not experience any oppression then.


M. P. Klodt. Marina Mnishek with her father in custody in Yaroslavl

But, as we remember, the killers of False Dmitry “overdid it”, mocking his corpse - so that many later did not recognize the body of the former tsar. In addition, the mother of the real Dmitry, who they tried to force once again to “identify her son,” uttered a mysterious and very cynical phrase:

“You should ask me when he was alive; and now, since you killed him, he is no longer mine.”

That is, on the one hand, she called the murdered man an impostor, but, on the other hand, she gave reason to believe that her “son” was “saved” again.


“Queen Martha denounces False Dmitry.” Colored lithograph based on a sketch by V. Babushkin

And one of the close associates of False Dmitry I (and the murderers of Fyodor Godunov) is Mikhail Molchanov, whom the Dutch merchant, traveler and diplomat Isaac Massa called “a great rogue and flatterer, who feared neither God nor people” and “a secret accomplice (of the Impostor) in all cruelties and debauchery,” fled to Poland. On the way, he told everyone about the salvation of the king.

Many people believed him - even Mnishek’s father and daughter, who also heard these rumors. At first, Molchanov, who reached Sambir, tried to declare himself the saved tsar and was recognized as such by Ivan Bolotnikov - the fugitive appointed him commander of the army. But Molchanov was not like the False Dmitry that many saw.

Prince G.K. Volkonsky, ambassador to the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, gives the following description of the appearance of the “Sambir thief”:

“He is not small in age, he is dark-skinned, his nose is a little gag-shaped (humpbacked), his eyebrows are black, not small, drooping, his eyes are small, the hair on his head is black and curly, smoothes from the forehead up, his mustache is black, and his beard is trimmed, there is a wart as long as a hair on his cheek...
The Polish man can speak Polish and read and write, and he can speak Latin.”

Having completed his career as an impostor, Molchanov returned to Moscow in 1608, was captured as a participant in a conspiracy against Shuisky and whipped. In 1609, he ended up in the detachment of the Polish hetman Sapega, then in the Tushinsky camp of False Dmitry II and became a guard under him. Then he was among the boyars who offered the crown of the Moscow state to the Polish prince Vladislav. During the Polish occupation of Moscow, he served as manager of the Pansky Prikaz and was cursed by Patriarch Hermogenes. In 1611, he was killed by rebel Muscovites.

So, there was no new False Dmitry from Molchanov, but we didn’t have to wait long for other impostors. Already at the beginning of 1607, in Vitebsk there was a man somewhat similar to the first Pretender, who on January 8 (18) presented a manifesto to Vasily Shuisky. True, very soon he himself became frightened of his courage and fled to Propoisk, where he ended up in prison. It is believed that there the Poles and their Russian allies “made him an offer that cannot be refused”: torture or even death, or continue to play the role of the saved Dmitry.


Portrait of False Dmitry II. Engraving. XNUMXth century

Konrad Bussov conveys the following words of Hetman Jan Sapieha, spoken by him near the Trinity-Sergius Monastery:

“Sitting one day with his officers at the table, (he) extolled the courage of the Poles, who are not lower, but even higher than the Romans, and among many other things, he also said the following: we, the Poles, three years ago placed on the Moscow throne a sovereign who should have been called Demetrius, the son of a tyrant, despite the fact that he was not one. Now we have brought the sovereign here for the second time and conquered almost half the country, and he must and will be called Demetrius, even if the Russians go crazy from it.”

And S. Platonov wrote about it this way:

“False Dmitry II came out of his drunken prison to do his job and declared himself tsar under pain of beatings and torture. It was not he who led the crowds of his supporters and subjects, but, on the contrary, they pulled him along in a spontaneous ferment, the motive of which was not the interest of the applicant, but the own interests of his troops.”

But the Polish king Sigismund III did not want war with Russia at that time, and therefore in May the new impostor went to Russia under the name of Andrei Nagogo to spread rumors about the “miraculous salvation of Tsar Dmitry.”

However, everything did not go according to plan: in Starodub, local residents and the Putivl delegates who arrived there began, under threat of torture, to demand to know the place where the surviving king was hiding. The impostor had to improvise: he accused the crowd of “unwillingness to recognize the true Sovereign,” his companions confirmed that the False Nag was Demetrius - and soon many southern cities swore allegiance to him.

So, who was this impostor, who could read and write in Russian and Polish (and some claim that he also knew Hebrew), and was well versed in church rituals? Prince Dmitry Mosalsky Gorbaty, governor of False Dmitry II, testified under torture that the impostor was “from Moscow from the Arbatu from Zakonyushev priests’ son Mitka.”

Boyar son Afanasy Tsyplatev, who served the second False Dmitry, stated that “Tsarevich Dmitry is called Litvin, Ondrei Kurbsky’s son.”

The cellarer of the Trinity-Sergius Monastery Abraham (Averky Palitsyn) considered him to come from a family of Starodub children of the boyar Verevkins.

The Jesuits considered the impostor to be a baptized Jew Bogdanko, who had previously been a teacher in Shklov, and then served in one of the churches of Mogilev, where his resemblance to the first impostor was noticed by the Pole M. Mekhovsky, who knew False Dmitry I.

Some considered him to be the Lithuanian clerk Bogdan Sutupov, or one of the clerks of False Dmitry I. And the ambassadors of the second False Dmitry once stated during negotiations:

“We do not deny that the man who calls himself Demetrius is not Demetrius at all, and we ourselves do not know who he is... He is God’s instrument.”

It was this man who was destined to enter history, like the Tushinsky thief and False Dmitry II. He did not have time to help Ivan Bolotnikov, who was defeated in besieged Tula, but in the spring of 1608, his army, led by the Lithuanian hetman Roman Ruzhinsky, defeated the government troops of Dmitry Shuisky (the tsar’s brother) at Belev and in June encamped in the village of Tushino.


False Dmitry II and the Tushino camp in the painting by S. V. Ivanov, 1908

Tushinsky thief's wife


In Tushino, False Dmitry II had his own boyar duma and his own patriarch - Filaret (Romanov), who until the end of his life the people would call him “the thieves”. He was the father of the future Tsar Michael, and received the rank of metropolitan from the first Pretender. And then both Filaret and Mikhail swore allegiance to the Polish prince Vladislav, who renounced the crown of the Muscovite kingdom only under the terms of the Polyanovsky Peace - in 1634: Mikhail Fedorovich Romanov bought this title from him for 20 thousand silver rubles.

But let's return to Marina Mniszek. On July 13 (23), 1608, the new Tsar Vasily Shuisky concluded a peace treaty with the Polish king Sigismund III, and one of its points was the release of all captive Poles (including Mnishkov) to their homeland. They tried to force Marina to renounce her rights to the Russian throne, but the proud Pole declared that she was crowned king and therefore was the legitimate ruler of the country. Apparently, they decided to get rid of her, and in mid-August 1608, she and her father were released to Poland.

However, old Mnishek contacted False Dmitry II (unlike his daughter, he had no illusions about the miraculous salvation of the first impostor), who was then in Tushino, and offered to recognize him as his son-in-law. The price was 30 thousand rubles (and after the occupation of Moscow, the Pretender promised another 300 thousand zlotys), the Seversk principality with 14 cities and part of the Smolensk land. By the way, on January 17, 1609, Jerzy Mniszek left for Poland and over time practically stopped contacts with the daughter he abandoned.

The Tushino detachment, led by captains Zborovsky and Stadnitsky, intercepted the Mnishek family on the way.

It was then that Marina learned that she was being taken not to her real husband, but to an impostor who had adopted his name. A priest found in the Tushino camp secretly married Marina and the impostor: without this ceremony, she refused to perform marital duties. So pride and ambition pushed her into the arms of a man about whom the Polish captain Samuel Maskiewicz wrote:

“The man is rude, has disgusting customs, and uses foul language in conversation.”

Maximilian Voloshin wrote about this:

“And Marina fled to Tushino
And she hugged me alive,
And, having gathered an unheard of army,
I approached Moscow again with glory.”

Marina and False Dmitry II in Kaluga


But soon the situation changed. Vasily Shuisky's appeal to Sweden, which was then at war with the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, for help led to Sigismund III declaring war on the Muscovite kingdom and besieging Smolensk in September. The Tushino camp was disintegrating: the Poles and some of the Russians went over to serve Sigismund, the rest were on the verge of rebellion.

And therefore, on December 27, 1609 (January 6, 1610), False Dmitry II chose to flee from Tushino to Kaluga - in a simple cart, hiding under shingles. Historians believe that it was from this time that False Dmitry II became an independent figure - until then he was just a puppet in the hands of others and he himself understood this.


N. D. Dmitriev-Orenburgsky. Arrival of the second Pretender in Kaluga after escaping from Tushino



Kaluga Fortress, reconstruction


And the “thieves” Tushino Patriarch Filaret and the boyars of the local Duma on February 4 (14), 1610, concluded an agreement with Sigismund III, according to which the king’s son, Vladislav, was to become the new Russian Tsar. On the night of February 24, Marina Mnishek also fled from Tushino, dressed in a man’s suit, to Kaluga. She left a note in her tent:

“I am leaving to defend my good name, my virtue itself, because, being the mistress of nations, the queen of Moscow, I cannot return to the class of Polish noblewoman and become a subject again.”

Heading south, to Kaluga, she ended up north - to Dmitrov. Either she didn’t know the way, or she purposefully went there, since this city was occupied by the troops of an ally, Jan Sapieha. She also told him:

“Should I, the Queen of All Russia, appear to my relatives in such a despicable form? I am ready to share with the king everything that God sends to him.”

Having withstood a short siege in Dmitrov, Marina finally reached Kaluga.


Kaluga, the supposed house where False Dmitry II and Marina Mnishek lived. Engraving by M. Rashevsky based on fig. I. Suslova. 1884

A new campaign against Moscow


After the unexpected death of the young governor M.V. Skopin-Shuisky, who managed to lift the siege of the Trinity-Sergius Lavra (according to rumors, he was poisoned by the wife of the Tsar’s brother Dmitry), on June 24, 1610, the Tsar’s army near Kluschin was defeated by the Polish army of Crown Hetman Stanislav Zhulkevsky. The deposition of Vasily Shuisky by the Moscow boyars led by Zakhar Lyapunov on July 17 (27), 1610 completely confused the situation.

Having assembled a new army, False Dmitry II took Serpukhov, Borovsk, Pafnutiev Monastery and on August 2 (12) besieged Moscow - this time he settled in the village of Kolomenskoye. Fearing the capture of the capital by False Dmitry, the new Moscow government (the notorious Seven Boyars) on August 17 (27), 1610, decided to swear allegiance to Prince Vladislav. Muscovites opened the gates to the Polish troops of Zhulkevsky. He, on behalf of the king, promised False Dmitry and Marina a choice of Sambir or Grodno. However, Marina, as the hetman wrote in his memoirs, replied:

“Let His Majesty the King yield to His Majesty the King of Krakow, and May His Majesty the King yield to His Majesty the King of Warsaw.”

Did she believe in success? Or was the very thought of returning to the life of an ordinary lady really unbearable for her? Perhaps she was inspired by the fiery speech delivered by the Byzantine Empress Theodora during the Nika uprising:

“Flight, even if it ever brought salvation and perhaps will bring it now, is unworthy. The one who is born cannot help but die, but for the one who once reigned, being a fugitive is unbearable. May I not lose this purple, may I not live to see the day when those I meet do not call me mistress! If you want to save yourself by flight, sir, it is not difficult. We have a lot of money, and the sea is nearby, and there are ships. But be careful that, having been saved, you do not have to choose death over salvation. I like the ancient saying that royal power is the best shroud.”

Death of the second Imposter


But the forces were no longer equal, and the Pretender again retreated to Kaluga, where he began to organize the executions of captured Poles, who were brought by the Don ataman Ivan Zarutsky and the Tatar (Nogai) prince Araslan (baptized Peter) Urusov. Subsequently, False Dmitry II planned to leave for Voronezh, but on November 22 of the same 1610, he, believing the denunciation, ordered the execution of his ally, the Kasimov Khan Uraz-Muhammad. The already mentioned Pyotr Urusov avenged his relative: on December 11 (21), the impostor was killed while hunting.

Look at the photographs of the Kaluga Forest, where the murder of False Dmitry II took place:



In the Chronicle of Khanykov you can read that Pyotr Urusov shot False Dmitry with a pistol, then, with the words: “I will teach you how to drown the khans and put the Murzas in prison,” he cut off his head. After this, he fled to Astrakhan, where he found and supported a new impostor, who went down in history as False Dmitry IV. He then ended up in Crimea, where he was eventually executed in 1639 by order of Khan Bahadir I Giray.

The pregnant Marina Mnishek became hysterical, she tore her clothes and hair and, calling for vengeance, ran with her breasts bare, demanding to kill her too. The Don Cossacks of Ataman Ivan Zarutsky, avenging the death of the “sovereign,” began to beat up the innocent “best” Tatar Murzas (the impostor’s killer, as we remember, had already fled to Astrakhan).


Marina Mnishek, inciting Kaluga residents to revenge for the death of the Tushino thief (from a drawing by A. Charlemagne)

Let us turn again to the poem by M. Voloshin, written on behalf of the Pretender:

“And then he lay in the snow - headless -
In the city of Kaluga above the Oka,
Killed by the Tatars and Zhmud...
And Marina with her breasts naked,
Raising torches above your head,
Prowled over the frozen river
And, circling around Moscow, in anger
Raised new dead
And she carried me alive in her womb.”

Just a few days later, Marina gave birth to a son, who was named Ivan. The residents of Kaluga and the army of False Dmitry II, including the Cossacks of Ivan Zarutsky, took the oath to the “prince.” Now Marina Mnishek has placed her bet on a newborn boy, hoping that he will become the new Russian Tsar. According to some reports, in addition to Zarutsky, the leader of the Ryazan militia, Prokopiy Lyapunov, was ready to recognize his rights to the throne.

In the next article we will continue and finish the story about Marina Mnishek.
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    6 October 2023 04: 47
    Subsequently, False Dmitry II planned to leave for Voronezh, but on November 22 of the same 1610, he, believing the denunciation, ordered the execution of his ally, the Kasimov Khan Uraz-Muhammad. The already mentioned Pyotr Urusov avenged his relative: on December 11 (21), the impostor was killed while hunting.

    Good morning! It is doubtful that they were related. One comes from the Kazakh Horde, the second from the Tatars. Urusov, if I'm not mistaken, was even baptized.
    Perhaps they were simply friends.
    Thank you Valery for continuing the cycle!
    1. +2
      6 October 2023 06: 29
      But they, all these khans, seemed to consider themselves Genghisids? So, some kind of relatives?
      1. +4
        6 October 2023 18: 30
        Quote: vet
        So, some kind of relatives?

        Only if through Adam and Eve.
      2. +2
        6 October 2023 21: 31
        Quote: vet
        But they, all these khans, seemed to consider themselves Genghisids? So, some kind of relatives?

        Urusov was not a direct descendant of Genghis Khan
  2. +2
    6 October 2023 04: 52
    Thank you, Valery!

    Tsvetaeva tried on the role of Mnishek:

    "Marina! Queen - King,
    Star to the impostor!
    I sing to you
    Your evil beauty
    Face without blush.
    I sin for your glory
    The royal sin of pride.
    Your name is glorious
    I wear it nicely” (c).
    1. +3
      6 October 2023 17: 51
      The title of the article is "Marina Mnishek. An attempt to be Theodora."
      The role model was, of course, worthy, but Marina Mnishek’s emulation of Theodora, due to the prevailing circumstances, turned out to be, let’s say, not entirely successful. I can’t resist making a pun - “Theodore’s grief.”
      1. +2
        6 October 2023 17: 53
        Thank you for the article - I read it with interest. If it’s not a secret, Valery, what will you write about after the series about Mniszech?
        1. VLR
          +4
          6 October 2023 18: 28
          Good evening, Dmitry. We’ll probably go back to the “time of troubles” of the early twentieth century and talk about Azef. A very “murky” and difficult person who played his own game and clearly outplayed the Okhrana in it - he made full use of his “curators” and received from them. more than I gave. He gave away very good people, but under him the small Fighting Organization of the Socialist Revolutionaries was truly formidable. Azef’s deputy, the famous Savinkov, after the boss’s exposure, really wanted to “restore the honor of terror” - but could not: not a single terrorist attack by the Socialist Revolutionaries without Azef succeeded. Everything rested on the “king of provocateurs.”
  3. +3
    6 October 2023 05: 55
    In the next article we will continue and finish the story about Marina Mnishek.
    In the third part, Valery, do not forget to mention Mniszech Castle and the legends associated with it.
  4. +2
    6 October 2023 06: 33
    This is the kind of wife Napoleon needed. Marina, bare-chested and with her son in her arms, would have kicked the cowardly men to defend Paris. And then the husband would have come up - and, lo and behold, Waterloo would have turned out the other way around.
    1. +2
      6 October 2023 08: 11
      They wouldn't get along with Napoleon. He was a rare egoist
      1. +2
        6 October 2023 17: 56
        But her father and Napoleon would have gotten along well. And he himself would look into his son-in-law’s mouth and indulge him in everything, and he would force his daughter smile
  5. +4
    6 October 2023 08: 07
    Pregnant Marina Mnishek became hysterical
    The aunt had no luck with her husbands, one ended badly, the second, the third, a “black widow”, simply.
    1. +3
      6 October 2023 09: 18
      The variations of the “iron throne” are very sharp. Especially if they start cloning False Dmitriev.
  6. +2
    6 October 2023 08: 12
    Although a series of articles should be about Marina Mnishek, in fact she somehow got lost against the background of the False Dmitrievs.
    Marina is the rightful queen of the Moscow kingdom. During the palace coup, she was “removed” from power. They sent me to Yaroslavl, and that was good.
    Having every opportunity to rally those “dissatisfied” with the usurpers around herself, by creating her own party, she had a huge chance to regain her rightful throne.
    But apparently her character is not “royal”, and her father did not dare to do so.
    And in fact, she was used as a puppet.
    Did Russia need such a Marina puppet? History itself put everything in its place.
    1. +2
      6 October 2023 09: 19
      I wonder what a legitimate throne might look like?
      1. +4
        6 October 2023 09: 55
        Probably very rich and beautiful! drinks
        I would choose where to sit myself)))
        1. +3
          6 October 2023 10: 23
          Lacquered over many generations. So that they have time to forget how they got it. Yes, and this is hard to believe.
      2. +3
        6 October 2023 19: 17
        I wonder what a legitimate throne might look like?

        Most likely so

        or so?

        Or maybe so laughing

        In any case, the principle should be like this
        If you don’t like the royal laws, go to the royal court (c) Henry VIII king of England
        1. +2
          6 October 2023 20: 31
          The first one looks like a fence.
          And the crown is slightly unnecessary in this case.
          1. +4
            6 October 2023 22: 51
            the throne looks like a fence

            -Tell me, Shervinsky, why are you now dragging out “God Save the Tsar”, nostalgia?
            -No, Viktor Viktorovich, just a beautiful melody. And that the tsar, the tsar himself, is to blame for what happened - there was no need to fence himself off from the people with a fence of laws and prejudices. But our hetman is simple and not arrogant, he is kind - he will accept anyone and listen to him in a fatherly way.
            - Empty gentlemen, stop arguing, I ask everyone to the table. And your hetman, lieutenant, that whip, senses my heart - don’t expect any good from him, he’ll bring us all under the monastery (c)
            M. Bulgakov. "Days of the Turbins"
    2. -1
      6 October 2023 09: 22
      Although a series of articles should be about Marina Mnishek, in fact she somehow got lost against the background of the False Dmitrievs.
      Everything that the author has written and will write about Mniszech will fit into one article.
    3. +2
      6 October 2023 18: 01
      Quote ee2100 (Alexander)
      Marina the puppet

      Yes, this is a ready-made pun! smile And with a certain amount of reality. I wouldn’t be surprised if this expression of yours becomes a meme.
      Greetings, Alexander!
  7. -5
    6 October 2023 08: 36
    The article is good, artistic, and would be suitable as a script for modern TV series. The historicity of the details described is doubtful.
  8. VLR
    +1
    6 October 2023 11: 05
    False Dmitry II, who gathered a new army, took Serpukhov, Borovsk, and the Pafnutiev Monastery

    By the way, the city of Borovsk under Catherine II received a coat of arms in honor of those events of 1610.


    “During the time of the second impostor, Borovsk and Pafnutyev, a monastery located in this city, were besieged by the accomplices of this villain; Its defenders were: the governors Prince Mikhailo Volkonsky, Yakov Zmiev and Afanasy Chelishchev with many others. And the last two, betraying the fatherland and the Tsar, surrendered the city and the monastery to this villain. Prince Volkonsky did not stop defending himself even in such extremes; even as he was pierced by many blows in the very church of the Pafnuty monastery, at the left choir, his stomach died. Recalling this incident worthy of being remembered, the coat of arms of this city consists of: in a silver field, depicting innocence and sincerity, a scarlet heart, showing fidelity, in the middle of which there is a cross, expressing true zeal for God's law, the basis of all virtue, and this heart is surrounded by green laurel a crown showing the indestructibility and firm persistence of glory worthy of this leader and others who died for a just cause with him.”


    And there is a painting by artist V. Demidov illustrating this episode:

  9. +1
    6 October 2023 18: 44
    Filaret (Romanov), who will be popularly called “the thieves” until the end of his life.

    Are you trying to be holier than the patriarch? stop
    In this case, Patriarch Hermogenes. He knew very well that Filaret was being held captive by the Tushintsy and therefore did not accuse him.
    . And then both Filaret and Mikhail swore allegiance to the Polish prince Vladislav,

    Actually, no. Filaret actively participated in the negotiations on inviting Vladislav Vasa to the throne, but demanded that he convert to Orthodoxy. The prince (or rather his father, who was a fanatical Catholic) refused, and Filaret was arrested.
    In general, the idea of ​​​​inviting a foreign sovereign was quite sensible in those conditions. The Kalitich dynasty came to an end. Choosing one of the boyars is fraught with the continuation of the Troubles. And here is the “natural sovereign”. All impostors immediately go through the forest.
    1. +3
      6 October 2023 19: 39
      So it is so, but where was one to look for a foreign Orthodox pretender to the throne? People wouldn't accept it otherwise