Russian riot

124
Russian riot
Fight with the Pugachevites. N. N. Karazin

250 years ago, the uprising of Emelyan Pugachev began. On September 28, 1773, Pugachev, who took the name of Emperor Peter III, published a manifesto, which granted the Cossacks ancient Cossack liberties and privileges.

Pugachevshchina


While Russian weapon covered itself with glory on the banks of the Danube, in the deepest Russia an abscess called Pugachevism broke out. This is a deeply tragic episode of the Russian stories - actually a civil war of the XNUMXth century. Or, as Soviet historiography called it, a peasant war caused by the strengthening of feudal-serf oppression.



Don Cossack Emelyan Pugachev, as military historian A. Kersnovsky noted, “was a typical “thief” in the old Russian sense of the word, and decided to “shake Moscow.”

Emelyan Ivanovich was born in the village of Zimoveyskaya, Don Region. The year of his birth is not established. A participant in the Seven Years' War with Prussia, from 1763 to 1767 he served in his native village. Participant in the war in Poland with the Bar Confederation, then with Turkey. A fugitive Cossack who went to the Yaik River (Ural) and declared himself Tsar Peter Fedorovich, who “miraculously escaped.” In general, the legend is traditional for the Troubles of the early XNUMXth century.

Pugachev was arrested and sent for investigation to Simbirsk, then to Kazan. At the end of the investigation, Pugachev was ordered to be “punished with whips” and sent to hard labor in Siberia. The Cossack escaped in May 1773 and in August reached the land of the Yaitsky army. In September, hiding from search parties, Emelyan Ivanovich, accompanied by a group of Cossacks, arrived at the Budarinsky outpost, where on September 17 (28), 1773, his first decree to the Yaitsky army was announced, which granted the Cossacks the same liberties. From here a detachment of 80 Cossacks headed up the Yaik. New supporters joined along the way. Thus began the uprising, which became a whole war.

The ground for the uprising was already ready. The Yaik Cossacks, who for a long time enjoyed the advantages of remoteness from the central government, in the XNUMXth century lost most of the elements of self-government and the election of elders and atamans. The army was divided into two parts. The "seniors" were satisfied with their position. The simple “army” repeatedly rebelled against innovations and demanded will.

Emelyan Ivanovich, declaring himself sovereign, gave the rebellion the appearance of legality, promising to return the Cossacks to their former liberties. The name of Peter III was also popular among the Old Believers, who, since the time of Nikon, had been subjected to terror and repression by the state. The Bashkirs, who rebelled more than once and were severely punished, also cherished the hope of returning to the old free times, also took Pugachev’s side.

All this was superimposed on the strengthening of the serfdom system and the growth of social injustice under the Romanovs. The people were divided into “European” nobles, educated and wealthy, who essentially became colonizers in the vast peasant Russia, and the rest of the people, mostly peasants. The peasants bore all duties, paid taxes, fought, and built an empire. And all the benefits were received by the “Europeans”.

Moreover, they were now exempted from compulsory military and government service. That is, now they did not pay a “tax in blood” for their privileged position. The noble landowners got the opportunity to live the life of a social parasite, take advantage of the labor of peasants and workers, organize feasts, balls and hunts, and do nothing for the state.

Social injustice has reached its highest point. This was the black page of the “golden age” of Catherine the Great. The Russian Empire achieved great success in foreign policy, but the enslavement of the people reached its highest stage. Which became the basis of the peasant war.


Yaitsk Cossacks in the campaign (watercolor of the late XVIII century)

“The Russian revolt is senseless and merciless”


The Yaik border line consisted of a number of weak fortresses and posts - villages occupied by garrisons who were no longer accustomed to service. The soldiers were elderly and disabled, and the Yaik and Orenburg Cossacks quickly went over to the side of the rebels. Almost all of these fortifications became easy prey for the Yaik Cossacks, experienced in military affairs. Officers who turned out to be faithful to the oath were exterminated, and the garrisons were annexed. Only Yaitsky town survived. From there the Pugachevites moved up the Yaik to Orenburg.

The forces of “Sovereign Peter III” grew quickly, and soon the detachment became a whole horde. When occupying small fortresses, the rebels received dozens of cannons. Already on October 5 (16), 1773, Pugachev’s 20-strong army approached the city of Orenburg. But the city had a relatively strong garrison (3 soldiers and 700 cannons) and good fortifications, so it survived. The siege lasted throughout the winter until March 70 (April 23), 3. The rebels were unable to take the fortress.

Pugachev entrusted the siege to his “general” Khlopusha, and he himself returned to the Yaitsky town. The foreman insisted on taking the capital of the Yaik Cossacks. The siege lasted from the end of December 1773 until April 16 (27), 1774. The garrison of Lieutenant Colonel Simonov (about 900 people with 18 guns) heroically fought back, relying on the internal fortress - the retranchement. The garrison of the fortress successfully defended itself and waited for the siege to be lifted by the corps of General Mansurov.

As a result, the main forces of the Pugachevites lost the entire winter in the unsuccessful siege of Orenburg and the Yaitsky town. That is, initiative and time were lost.

It is worth remembering that at this time the entire combat-ready part of the Russian army was fighting the Ottomans. Meanwhile, the government realized that the threat was great and took measures to eliminate the uprising.


“I’m not a raven, I’m a little raven, and the raven still flies.”


A talented organizer and commander, Alexander Ivanovich Bibikov, arrived on Yaik, and the regiments that arrived from the internal provinces, mostly garrison ones, were subordinated to him. Here it is necessary to note the strength of the empire of Catherine II, the empress’s talent for selecting statesmen and military leaders.

On March 22 (April 2), 1774, in the battle of Tatishcheva, the corps of generals Mansurov, Golitsyn and Freiman’s detachment (7 thousand soldiers in total) defeated the main forces of the rebels (9 thousand). The fight was extremely stubborn. Golitsyn wrote in his report to Bibikov:

“The matter was so important that I did not expect such insolence and control in such unenlightened people in the military profession as these defeated rebels are.”

The Cossacks, relying on the Tatishchev fortress, made forays and repeatedly disrupted the ranks of the attackers with cannon fire. Golitsyn, Mansurov and Freiman had to personally lead the soldiers to the attack with drawn swords. The rebels' defense became hopeless when the Bakhmut hussars and Chuguev Cossacks came to their rear.

Pugachev decided to retreat; his retreat was covered by the Cossack regiment of Ataman Ovchinnikov. In this fierce battle, the rebels lost about 6 thousand people and all their artillery (32 guns).

The siege was lifted from Orenburg, and then from Yaitsky town. Pugachev and the remnants of his army fled to the Southern Urals. The Yaik region was cleared of rebels.

It seemed that the impostor and the uprising were over. However, on April 9 (24), Commander Bibikov died. Catherine II entrusted the command of the troops to Lieutenant General Shcherbatov as the senior in rank. Golitsyn, offended that he was not appointed to the post of commander of the troops, sent small teams to nearby fortresses and villages to carry out investigations and punishments, and with the main forces stayed in Orenburg for three months.

The Pugachevites had the opportunity to restore their strength and go on a new offensive. Pugachev led his detachment to the Ural mining region, where he found an exceptionally strong social and material base. The proletariat of that time massively supported “Peter III”. In May-June, the Pugachevites captured the middle and lower reaches of the Kama River, occupied Magnitnaya, Osa, Izhevsk and Votkinsk factories. Factories were burned when abandoned.

The rebels were pursued by Colonel Mikhelson, when he caught up, he smashed the Pugachevites. The combat effectiveness of the rebel horde was low. There were few weapons, horses, or experienced soldiers. However, the defeated rebels quickly gathered new hordes, and they were joined en masse by factory workers, peasants, and representatives of the small peoples of the Volga region.

Having again gathered a large army of 20 thousand, the impostor led him to Kazan. On July 12–13 (23–24), the Pugachevites defeated and burned the city, which was not ready for defense. The garrison locked itself in the Kremlin. On July 13, Mikhelson caught up with the rebels and defeated them. On July 15, Mikhelson again defeated the rebels, up to 2 thousand were killed, up to 5 thousand people were captured. With a small detachment, Pugachev fled again and crossed the Volga on July 17.

Despite the constant defeats, the rebellion only expanded. There was a rumor that Pugachev was marching on Moscow. On July 28, a decree on freedom for peasants was read out in the central square of Saransk. The same manifesto was announced on July 31 in Penza. Thousands of Russian, Chuvash, Tatar and Mordovian peasants rebelled. The destruction of estates and reprisals against landowners and officials began everywhere. Some of the newly baptized Chuvash and Mari destroyed churches and killed priests. There was a Russian revolt - senseless and merciless. In the regions affected by the rebellion, noble landowners, officers, officials, and often the clergy were exterminated.

Kazan, Simbirsk, Penza, Saratov and part of the Nizhny Novgorod province burned. A population of more than 1 million people was involved in the peasant war. Two or three Pugachevites raised the volost, a small detachment raised the entire county. Pugachev’s campaign across the Volga region became a real triumphal procession, with bells ringing, the blessing of the village priest and bread and salt in every new village.


Pugachev's court. V. G. Perov

“Forgive me, Orthodox people”


Mikhelson managed to cover Moscow and the central regions in the battle of Arzamas. July-August became critical for the Pugachev era. Moscow is quickly strengthening itself. The shelves are pulled together there. General Panin was appointed as the new commander. He is endowed with extraordinary powers “to suppress rebellion and restore internal order in the provinces of Orenburg, Kazan and Nizhny Novgorod.” The terms of peace with Turkey were softened, troops and Suvorov were called from the Danube Front.

From Penza Pugachev turned south. Researchers believe that he wanted to raise the Volga and Don Cossacks. Also to the south, to his native places, he was drawn by the Yaik Cossacks. On August 7 (18), Saratov was captured. Saratov priests in all churches served prayers for the health of Emperor Peter III. But already on August 11 (22), the city was occupied by Mikhelson, who was hot on the heels of the rebels.

After Saratov, the rebels went down the Volga to Kamyshin, which, like many cities before it, greeted Pugachev with ringing bells and bread and salt. On August 21 (September 1), Pugachev made an unsuccessful attempt to take Tsaritsyn by storm. Having received news of Mikhelson's approach, Pugachev hastened to lift the siege of Tsaritsyn, and the rebels moved to Black Yar. Astrakhan is being hastily prepared for defense. On August 25 (September 6) at Solenikova fishing detachments of Pugachev (10 thousand) were overtaken and defeated by Mikhelson (more than 4 thousand). Government troops pursued the fleeing 40 miles, many drowned in the Volga. About 2 thousand were killed, 6 thousand people were taken prisoner, 24 guns were captured.


Ivan Ivanovich Mikhelson (1740–1807) - Russian military leader, cavalry general, known primarily for his victory over Pugachev

Pugachev with a few comrades fled across the Volga, into the Yaik steppes. There he was captured by his former assistants and handed over to the authorities for a promise of pardon. On September 15, the chieftain was taken to Yaitsky town. The first interrogations took place there, one of them was conducted personally by Suvorov, who also volunteered to escort the impostor to Simbirsk, where the main investigation was taking place.

To transport Pugachev, a tight cage was made, installed on a two-wheeled cart, in which, chained hand and foot, he could not even turn around. In Simbirsk, for five days he was interrogated by the head of the secret investigative commissions P. S. Potemkin and Count Panin.

This episode was described in his research work “The History of Pugachev” by Alexander Pushkin (he was very interested in this history and studied a lot):

“Pugachev was brought directly to the courtyard of Count Panin, who met him on the porch, surrounded by his headquarters. "Who are you?" – he asked the impostor. “Emelyan Ivanov Pugachev,” he answered. “How dare you, thief, call yourself a sovereign?” - Panin continued. “I’m not a raven (Pugachev objected, playing with words and expressing himself, as usual, allegorically), I’m a little raven, and a raven still flies.”

On January 10 (January 21), 1775, an execution was carried out on Bolotnaya Square in Moscow in front of a huge crowd of people. Pugachev behaved with dignity, ascended to the place of execution, crossed himself at the Kremlin cathedrals, bowed to four sides with the words “Forgive me, Orthodox people.” Sentenced to quartering Pugachev and A.P. Perfilyev (one of the main associates of “Peter III”, his “chief general”), the executioner first cut off their heads, such was the wish of the empress.


V. Matorin. Execution of Pugachev

Value


“The Lord was pleased to punish Russia through my damnation,”

- Pugachev said to Suvorov.


In the Pugachevism one can see the future, even larger-scale Russian Troubles of 1917. Pugachev promised freedom and liberation from the incoming administration to the Yaik Cossacks, Old Believers and Bashkirs. For factory workers, urban bourgeoisie and state peasants – freedom, “nationalization of factories and mines”, duty-free trade and abolition of taxes. He promised the serfs “land and freedom.” Pugachev is a prototype of the Bolsheviks, only in one person, without a party. Therefore, Vladimir Lenin was a big fan of Pugachevism.

The peasant war was drowned in blood. Serf slavery was strengthened. The Romanovs generally tried to destroy any memory of this turmoil. They even renamed the Yaik area to the Ural, and the Yaik army to the Ural. It was forbidden to write about the Troubles and collect materials about it. Pushkin achieved this right only with the personal permission of Tsar Nicholas I.

It is obvious that after the suppression of the unrest, Catherine II should have given freedom to the peasants. Restore social justice. However, the truly great empress, understanding the injustice of this system, could not go against the nobility. Tsar Alexander I could have become a real Blessed One if at the end of 1812, after the victory over all of Europe, when the people helped bury the “twelve languages,” he would have rid Russia of serfdom. But he didn’t dare either.

The reform of 1861 was clearly late, the roots of popular hatred had already taken root, the split of the people became irreversible, becoming the root cause of the disaster of 1917.


“A true portrayal of the rebel and deceiver Emelka Pugachev.” Unknown artist from Simbirsk. 1774
124 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +25
    28 September 2023 03: 19
    It would be good for the current leaders in the Kremlin to learn the lessons of history. Very useful...
    1. +28
      28 September 2023 05: 14
      It would be good for the current leaders in the Kremlin to learn the lessons of history. Very useful...
      That's how they learned it. The common people are needed to rob and exploit them. And for the dissatisfied - the National Guard and genocide.
      1. +3
        28 September 2023 07: 52
        So this is the mentality, having grabbed the trough, people turn into self-loving scum, even the commies couldn’t cope with this, party dachas, special sanatoriums and benefits signed their death sentence....
        1. +20
          28 September 2023 08: 51
          I, a hard worker, also had a “dacha” and my grandmother, an honorary donor of the RSFSR, who gave her blood to wounded soldiers for more than three years of war, went to the sanatorium. It would be strange if the state did not create conditions for its managers. Should they have been held responsible for the stew?
          And these people on golden toilets and yachts 100 meters away are also signing their own death warrant or what?
          1. +6
            28 September 2023 09: 38
            Quote: Essex62
            Should they have been held responsible for the stew?
            No, for fear, if there is no conscience or communist consciousness. So after Stalin they completely lost their fear.
            1. -1
              28 September 2023 14: 40
              Quote: Stanislav_Shishkin
              Quote: Essex62
              Should they have been held responsible for the stew?
              No, for fear, if there is no conscience or communist consciousness. So after Stalin they completely lost their fear.

              And how many people do you know who want to lead and bear responsibility under threat?
              No, I know one, but he has a certificate with a stamp....
              1. +1
                5 October 2023 13: 57
                Quote: your1970
                And how many people do you know who want to lead and bear responsibility under threat?
                If responsibility does not cause fear, at least of the shame that one will have to experience if the assigned task fails, then it is not responsibility. Transfer to another area of ​​leading party economic work was a very weak form of responsibility, and then only for those who were afraid that they would lose income, legal or illegal. Do you know many managers who have been held accountable for poor performance in their jobs?
          2. +7
            28 September 2023 09: 51
            Quote: Essex62
            And these people on golden toilets and yachts 100 meters away are also signing their own death warrant or what?

            No, unfortunately, nothing will happen with this; it will not even be their children who will be overthrown, but their grandchildren...
      2. +12
        28 September 2023 09: 14
        Quote from A2AD
        It would be good for the current leaders in the Kremlin to learn the lessons of history. Very useful...
        That's how they learned it. The common people are needed to rob and exploit them. And for the dissatisfied - the National Guard and genocide.

        The North Military District showed that in order to defeat numerous external enemies (more than one billion people), we need the Russian people who want to fight for their Motherland, the state, and the social system. At the beginning of the Northern Military District, when the Russian Army was advancing on all fronts, the Defense Ministry could easily mobilize a million, five million, or ten million reservists. People had an impulse. And now they are collecting from the bottom of the barrel, because not everyone is eager to participate in the imperialist war, incomprehensible agreements for the sake of the interests of the oligarchs and the bourgeoisie. Duma deputies say that those mobilized will be at the front until the end of the Northern Military District. Shoigu said that the NWO will continue in 2025. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if, as a result of the impotent SVO, a new Pugachev appears, despite the purge by the authorities of the people’s commanders and passionaries.
        1. +14
          28 September 2023 09: 31
          Quote: Bearded
          At the beginning of the Northern Military District, when the Russian Army was advancing on all fronts, the Defense Ministry could easily mobilize a million, five million, or ten million reservists.

          Yeah... but there was barely enough uniform and equipment for 300 thousand.
        2. +3
          28 September 2023 09: 56
          Quote: Bearded
          the Russian people are needed

          Who needs?
          Quote: Bearded
          social order

          For what? For the social system?
          Quote: Bearded
          ten million reservists

          Hmm... Who will work? Oh, well, yes, I forgot about the guys from sunny Asia...
        3. +3
          28 September 2023 20: 05
          Duma deputies say that those mobilized will be at the front until the end of the Northern Military District. Shoigu said that the NWO will continue in 2025.


          I would really like to see at least one volunteer regiment in the Northern Military District consisting entirely of members of United Russia, equipped and armed with funds raised by deputies of the State Duma and the Federation Council....
      3. +5
        28 September 2023 20: 06
        It’s not surprising, the exploiting class adopts all the “developments” of the gentlemen from the Republic of Ingushetia, this is their social ideal.
        1. 0
          5 October 2023 11: 42
          well said, do not add, do not subtract
      4. 0
        7 October 2023 00: 41
        The country today is not the same as it was in the 18th century. Not a peasant, and not a worker.
    2. +4
      28 September 2023 07: 02
      Quote from: FoBoss_VM
      It would be good for the current leaders in the Kremlin to learn the lessons of history. Very useful...

      So the authorities haven’t learned their lessons in 250 years. Obviously they didn’t study well at school
    3. +12
      28 September 2023 09: 18
      But they did learn it, otherwise why are they keeping 40 “loyal Pihotins” from one emirate of the Russian Federation under the banners of the FSVNG, from whom the only use in the North Military District is tik-tok.
      1. -7
        28 September 2023 16: 53
        Quote from AdAstra
        Otherwise, why are 40 “loyal Pikhotins” kept?

        And, you remember the internal troops of the USSR. Were there many Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians in these troops? For every hundred nationalities, there are seven people with the European appearance of military personnel. . Why ? Because !
      2. +1
        28 September 2023 23: 33
        Quote from AdAstra
        But they did learn it, otherwise why are they keeping 40 “loyal Pihotins” from one emirate of the Russian Federation under the banners of the FSVNG, from whom the only use in the North Military District is tik-tok.

        For whose sake was the Dzerzhinsky division kept in Moscow in the USSR?!!
        and Tamanskaya and Kantemirovskaya loomed nearby...
        The general secretaries built such a massive army in Moscow - against whom?
    4. +1
      28 September 2023 11: 27
      Read Alexey Ivanov's "Pitchfork" Everything is said there
    5. +4
      28 September 2023 19: 02
      Quote from: FoBoss_VM
      It would be good for the current leaders in the Kremlin to learn the lessons of history. Very useful...

      And they learned these lessons...To pacify the population, the 340-strong National Guard was created, and the legal order at the municipal level is supported by the district police officers “Teltsovs” and “Svistunovs”.
      The current leaders have secured their existence with security structures...To prevent workers (proletarians) from organizing in their trade unions, they destroyed the entire industry and all production, diluting the labor collectives with their informers, sycophants, tamed by trade union leaders (or the lack thereof a priori) and the provisions of the labor code , where cunning lawyers wrote everything so that only the employer has rights...
      Why beat around the bush? The created new pension reform does not leave a person the right to live without bosses on a decent, well-deserved pension. Okay...Then why the hell do we continue to feed useless officials over 65 years old? Why did you take root there in power? Whose interests do you continue to defend?
      How to look at these shameful multi-day elections to choose the government? How should we treat the Central Election Commission, which does not find anything reprehensible about outspoken Chaldeans (the same Sobchak) and is looking for obstacles to the opposition Grudinin... I can’t even imagine who will decide to take part in the 2024 election campaign...
      How many worthy people have died suddenly over these quarter of a century? And what have we come to?
      * * *
      Today it is so fashionable to turn to God and imagine oneself as a devout person... Do so-called leaders observe all of Christ’s commandments today? Can we say that they do not commit adultery, do not kill, do not steal, and do not covet anything that is their neighbor’s?
      And, most importantly, do they keep the commandments:
      Honor God and serve Him alone;
      Do not make yourself an idol..
      Hardly...
      1. +1
        28 September 2023 23: 48
        Quote: ROSS 42
        opposition Grudinin.

        Billionaire(the owner of 97% of the shares of the company at that time) - candidate from the communists??
        The one that was pressed a little and it started to flow? How would he rule the country if he were elected? From the pressure of the intelligence services, pensioners, the army, the opposition, bureaucrats, NATO, US teachers, oligarchs, doctors and so on - how would he work?

        “I’m a sinful person, I would have signed up with the Bolsheviks on purpose just to shoot you. I would have shot you and immediately been discharged back.” (c) Running
        As I understand it...
    6. +3
      28 September 2023 21: 47
      Quote from: FoBoss_VM
      Very useful...

      By the way, in the Penza region there is the village of Vadinsk, previously called the city of Knrensk (on the map in this article), through which the Pugachevites passed.
      So the residents of Kerensk refused to join the rebels because They believed that they were not living poorly and that they were satisfied with everything. Then the Pugachevites burned all the settlements around the city, and the residents who took refuge in it repelled four assaults by the Pugachevites. Having failed to achieve success, the Pugachevites retreated. 50 captured Turks helped in the defense of the city.
      For this defense, Catherine the Second, by decree, assigned the Golden Crown to the Coat of Arms of the city of Kerensk (which is still kept in the Penza Museum).
      Everything is in the public domain.
      So much for the people's movement.
  2. +4
    28 September 2023 03: 39
    Can the popular movement that was accompanied by the establishment of people's Cossack democracy be called a rebellion?

    Rather, this movement mixed progressive democratic traits and reactionary gangster ones.

    If Pugachev had not gone to the west, but created the Ural Cossack republic in the 18th century, the fate of Russia could have been different. He lacked business executives and organizers. But there were bandits in abundance.

    As a result, the Cossack revolution drowned in lawlessness and blood.
    1. +7
      28 September 2023 04: 04
      How long would such a republic last?
      1. +1
        28 September 2023 04: 16
        Quote: Sugar Honeyovich
        How long would such a republic last?

        Heh.... heh.... It depends on the ratio of the number of normal people and cretins in a particular country...... History shows that in different countries and peoples it developed differently.
        In Russia, for example, “such a republic” did not arise at all... laughing
        1. +7
          28 September 2023 04: 46
          in different countries and peoples
          In Denmark, such a “free republic” - Christiania - has become a squat for informals and a tourist attraction.
          1. +1
            28 September 2023 07: 23
            Quote: Bolt Cutter
            in different countries and peoples
            In Denmark, such a “free republic” - Christiania - has become a squat for informals and a tourist attraction.

            In Russia, it became a symbol of the sea of ​​blood and banditry. To each his own. I wrote about this.
            1. +1
              28 September 2023 14: 15
              In Russia, it became a symbol of the sea of ​​blood and banditry.
              The drug den is somehow more symbolic Yes . Where did such experiments end successfully? Which peoples?
          2. +9
            28 September 2023 09: 30
            I was not in Christiania, my son came. It's just a bunch of punks, hippies, junkies and drug dealers. Everything is sold almost openly.
            1. +1
              28 September 2023 11: 49
              punks, hippies, junkies and drug dealers.
              Add in Afro-Arab Danish residents and curious tourists, and the picture is complete. And dope (not all) is really sold there openly - according to their laws (they are independent) it is legal. It is also consumed openly - as a result, fifty stoners are sitting on the benches with tables placed for this and looking at you as if you were an alien with ten legs in a police uniform wassat .
              1. 0
                28 September 2023 22: 26
                Therefore, the example of self-government is so-so). My son was still there when there was a concert-meeting for legalization in Denmark...there smoke rose above the crowd as if from a peat fire. Well, the smell too)
    2. -1
      28 September 2023 07: 05
      Quote: ivan2022
      Can the popular movement that was accompanied by the establishment of people's Cossack democracy be called a rebellion?

      Rather, this movement mixed progressive democratic traits and reactionary gangster ones.

      If Pugachev had not gone to the west, but created the Ural Cossack republic in the 18th century, the fate of Russia could have been different. He lacked business executives and organizers. But there were bandits in abundance.

      As a result, the Cossack revolution drowned in lawlessness and blood.

      Read the book "Pugachev the Winner". There would be no democracy. There would be anarchy like Makhnovskaya
      1. -1
        28 September 2023 07: 20
        Did I write that democracy was established? Put on your glasses... laughing
        1. -1
          28 September 2023 09: 14
          Quote: ivan2022
          Did I write that democracy was established? Put on your glasses... laughing


          Progressive democratic features are not your words? Well, yes, a cook can rule the state. But can a cook fight Napoleon?
          1. +1
            29 September 2023 13: 33
            About the cook. Do you know that Lenin said exactly the opposite? That a cook can NOT run a government! Search and read the original! This myth about the cook has been hammered into people’s heads so much since perestroika that they still remember it here and there. We've already had enough of this cook.
            1. -2
              29 September 2023 18: 15
              Quote: Yuri Vasiliev
              About the cook. Do you know that Lenin said exactly the opposite? That a cook can NOT run a government! Search and read the original! This myth about the cook has been hammered into people’s heads so much since perestroika that they still remember it here and there. We've already had enough of this cook.

              This does not change the essence of the matter. A person without education cannot lead anything. And he cannot build something like a state.
              “We demand that training in public administration be carried out by class-conscious workers and soldiers and that it begin immediately, that is, all workers, all the poor, immediately begin to be involved in this training.” And who would train Pugachev?
    3. 0
      28 September 2023 08: 57
      Quote: ivan2022
      Can the popular movement that was accompanied by the establishment of people's Cossack democracy be called a rebellion?

      What is this people's democracy that was organized........ in abundance of bandits,......... drowned in lawlessness and blood, ...... but progressive democratic traits were mixed.
  3. +2
    28 September 2023 04: 44
    The conclusion that can be drawn is: the “Russian revolt” is a response to the unlawful transfer of power in St. Petersburg.
    1. +12
      28 September 2023 07: 25
      Quote from pavel.tipingmail.com
      The conclusion that can be drawn is: the “Russian revolt” is a response to the unlawful transfer of power in St. Petersburg.

      Like the fact that Russian men of the 18th century were very worried about the procedure for legality and transfer of power in St. Petersburg? And they didn’t care about their own fate and standard of living... laughing
      Original.... But in general, who knows.... . The Russian soul is darkness...

      In the 90s, for example, the standard of living dropped terribly, but Yeltsin was still supported and recognized... Although he simply put a huge bolt on this very “legitimacy of the transfer of power” when he shot up the White House in 1993.
      1. +2
        28 September 2023 08: 18
        So the Russian men were not worried about the legal side of the matter, but about the fact that “the tsar is not real.”
      2. 0
        7 October 2023 00: 03
        They supported it due to the inertia left over from Soviet times. They believed in a sacred “leader” and “guarantor”. In conditions of complete dominance of the Yeltsin side in the tame media. The Internet was still in its infancy. And the “best in the world” Soviet education, alas, did not teach either political and economic literacy or critical thinking.
  4. 0
    28 September 2023 05: 21
    Don Cossack Emelyan Pugachev, as military historian A. Kersnovsky noted, “was a typical “thief” in the old Russian sense of the word, and decided to “shake Moscow.”
    Well, if in Old Russian then call him not the word thief, but the word "TOUCH", that is, he was engaged in theft.
    1. +5
      28 September 2023 09: 07
      Quote: bionik
      if in Old Russian then call him not the word thief but the word "THAT"

      No. "Tat" is the one who steals. "Tatba" is a criminal theft, which does not, however, turn into robbery.
      And “Vor” is precisely a political criminal. “Theft” - in modern language - “crimes against state power, the foundations of the constitutional system, justice and governance,” as well as betrayal.
    2. +6
      28 September 2023 10: 37
      Well, if in Old Russian then you call him not the word thief, but the word “THAT”, that is, he was engaged in stealing.

      Oh, Vladislav, feel Just in the old Russian way - he was a thief. For example, compare two texts from old dictionaries:
      ROBBER ORDER (since 1683 Detective Order), center. state institutions in Russia in the 2nd third of 16 – beginning. 18th century, in charge of investigation and trial of criminal offenses. Came into the horse. 1540s on the basis of the boyar commission, which dealt with 1539 “robbery cases”; It was first mentioned in documents in 1552 as Robber's Hut. Its jurisdiction extended to all categories of the population...” the robbery detective order was established in Moscow to conduct “terrorist, robbery and murder investigations and investigations on them. in the cities of Tatin and robbery and right to the elders. And demand from them for this news

      и
      SECRET AFFAIRS PRIKAZ (Secret order) - center. state institutions in Rus. state in the 2nd floor. 17th century, in charge of matters that were not subject to disclosure. “Create under the royal person an “Order of Secret Affairs; and in it sits a devil, and 10 clerks, and they are in charge and do all sorts of royal affairs, secret and open; and in that Order, boyars and duma people are not included and they don’t know besides the tsar himself." Yes, besides the personal royal and palace affairs and worries, the order is to carry out thieves' investigation against thieves - seducers and traitors, regardless of their rank. This order was established in Moscow ѣ for conducting “thieves’ cases, treason investigations and investigations” him."...Everyone who hears the charming speeches of the thieves should call the thieves and shout: "The word and deed of the Sovereign." And the catchers will receive a reward for faithful service or a part of the thieves' property after...

      In other words, Vladislav, a thief is a political criminal who deceives with words, lies, i.e., “steals faith (truth),” and thus differs from a common criminal, from a thief
    3. 0
      9 October 2023 10: 24
      A thief is a thief in the modern understanding of the word. And the sovereign’s criminals used to be called a thief. That's what they said - such and such a king stole the king's father, that is, betrayed him, rebelled.
  5. +10
    28 September 2023 05: 28
    Quote from: FoBoss_VM
    It would be good for the current leaders in the Kremlin to learn the lessons of history. Very useful...

    They are sure that Russia and the Kremlin are only the address of their place of work, and business jets at airports are always ready to take them “home”.
    1. +6
      28 September 2023 09: 20
      Why did you put the word home in quotation marks? It is for them without any quotation marks.
    2. 0
      7 October 2023 00: 09
      No one is waiting for them “home” after 2022 (except in court).
  6. -4
    28 September 2023 05: 34
    It can be assumed, in my opinion, that at the same time both Pugachev’s rebellion and Tarakanova’s scam just at a time when Russia was confidently waging war with Turkey, it was no coincidence that they happened exactly then. Someone's ears are sticking out there. Perhaps the same ones who later, at a time when Russia behaved uncertainly in the war with Japan in 1905 and in the First World War, the same masters of the “ears” helped so that something would happen in Russia that then they were unable to accomplish through Pugachevism. The difference in the outcome is that Mother Catherine the Second turned out to have an iron will and loyal generals, preserving Russia to preserve herself and her power, while Father Nicholas II’s will, like the Faberge statesman, turned out to be an exaggerated sham, and even the generals and elite betrayed such a Tsar. Therefore, that mother began to be called Catherine the Great, and that priest began to be called simply Nikolashka...
    1. +6
      28 September 2023 07: 38
      In.. In... The German dynasty on the Russian throne is class..... And the German Catherine is just “dear mother”... Almost. laughing But God forbid the Turks?

      But in 1920 there was no riot in the Tambov province? And there was an uprising, which purely by chance coincided with the beginning of the Polish intervention.... And the ears “don’t stick out” anywhere...
    2. +2
      28 September 2023 08: 04
      Someone's ears are sticking out there
      Is it really Anglo-French? laughing
      1. +6
        28 September 2023 09: 08
        Quote: kor1vet1974
        Someone's ears are sticking out there
        Is it really Anglo-French? laughing

        How is it possible, sir! exclusively Judeo-Masonic! Yes
        1. +2
          28 September 2023 11: 02
          Are you hinting at Panin’s ears? By the way, Catherine was very interested in this question about ears. She didn’t even want to take into account the version of foreign ears, but she was thinking about her own, home-grown ones. smile
  7. +10
    28 September 2023 06: 06
    Thank you, Lord, without Tartaria, the article managed... And there is a version that the Pugachev uprising is one of the wars of Tartaria, against the Russian Empire, like the Bulavinsky, Astrakhan uprisings in the era of Peter laughing laughing
    1. +1
      28 September 2023 07: 31
      We will wait for people in Ukraine to remember that Pugachev is a pure Ukrainian who fought the Russians for freedom. wink
      1. +2
        28 September 2023 09: 21
        And the Bashkirs are also “clean”, these same ones laughing
  8. +8
    28 September 2023 06: 31
    The level of the article is as if I was reading a school textbook.
    1. -8
      28 September 2023 07: 59
      All power to the Soviets!

      Quote: Alexey 1970
      The level of the article is as if I was reading a school textbook.

      If you want to be understood, express yourself in the language that those listening to you speak. And taking into account the fact that young people mostly have knowledge according to the requirements of the Unified State Exam, that is, none at all, an article written in this style is quite acceptable.

      About the riot.
      With the arrival of the Romanovs, the enslavement of the people began, which we call “serfdom.” The people didn't like it. Pugachev's revolt is only a fragment of the people's general opposition to newcomers. Starting from the Battle of Kulikovo, the “Solovetsky Sitting” and ending with the execution of the Streltsy, the people openly opposed those who seized power. The confrontation is also taking place at the ideological level. Nikon's reform, the persecution of the Old Believers (Old Believers), the harsh suppression of any dissent (12 Articles of Sophia), the burning of disagreeing villages in log houses and accusing them of allegedly doing it themselves... does not remind you of anything? The confrontation is practically still going on today... Our subconscious dissatisfaction with any power comes from there.

      But. Bad power is better than anarchy.
      State - this is not only an apparatus of violence of the minority over the majority, as K. Marx wrote, but also it is a system of survival, preservation and development of the peoples inhabiting it.

      What it is like when power does not belong to the state, we see in the example of Ukraine. At a time when the country is conducting a military training exercise, I consider this article inappropriate and provocative.
      1. +7
        28 September 2023 08: 15
        So go to them and educate them, if you forgot, then here is VO and people have a priori mastered school.
        1. -5
          28 September 2023 08: 21
          All power to the Soviets!

          Again. You need to talk to people in their language.
          It is pointless to tell the inhabitants of the plains about the beauty of the snow-white mountains. hi
      2. +4
        28 September 2023 10: 04
        At a time when the country is conducting a military training exercise, I consider this article inappropriate and provocative.
        Yeah......"at a time when our spaceships are roaming the expanses of the Universe!." (c)
        1. +3
          28 September 2023 10: 42
          hi And also to ban everything, as well as “not to let in” and “take everything and divide it up...” somehow such texts remind me more and more of Sharikov and Shvonder with their sayings.
          1. +5
            28 September 2023 10: 51
            hi
            And also ban everything
            It is not prohibited here, it is not recommended here smile
    2. +3
      28 September 2023 09: 09
      Moreover, three different ones, the theses of which they tried to combine in one article
  9. +4
    28 September 2023 06: 34
    Quote: North 2
    It can be assumed, in my opinion, that at the same time both Pugachev’s rebellion and Tarakanova’s scam just at a time when Russia was confidently waging war with Turkey, it was no coincidence that they happened exactly then. Someone's ears are sticking out there. Perhaps the same ones who later, at a time when Russia behaved uncertainly in the war with Japan in 1905 and in the First World War, the same masters of the “ears” helped so that something would happen in Russia that then they were unable to accomplish through Pugachevism. The difference in the outcome is that Mother Catherine the Second turned out to have an iron will and loyal generals, preserving Russia to preserve herself and her power, while Father Nicholas II’s will, like the Faberge statesman, turned out to be an exaggerated sham, and even the generals and elite betrayed such a Tsar. Therefore, that mother began to be called Catherine the Great, and that priest began to be called simply Nikolashka...

    Nikolai's weakness was a consequence of the fact that mother had an iron will to maintain the slavish position of the majority in favor of the absolute minority.
    1. +1
      28 September 2023 20: 17
      and they began to call that priest simply Nikolashka...

      Nikolashka-bloody....
  10. +2
    28 September 2023 07: 13
    On the map, the place of Pugachev’s captivity is indicated south of Aleksandrov Gai. In fact, there is a bare, flat desert where it is impossible to hide from pursuers
    It is much more likely that he passed north of AlGai - the terrain is more undulating, there are ravines and estuaries for feeding horses, and along the Uzeni there are thickets of trees as a source of fuel and shelter.
    1. +3
      28 September 2023 10: 00
      And now you don’t know the names of Pugachev and Razin, they are anathematized in the church. They did it before 1917, but now what?
      1. +5
        28 September 2023 10: 32
        Quote: kor1vet1974
        And now you don’t know the names of Pugachev and Razin, they are anathematized in the church. They did it before 1917, but now what?

        Nowadays they don’t anathematize anyone. But priests have nothing to do but remember Pugachev.
        1. +7
          28 September 2023 10: 57
          There's nothing for priests to do
          Yeah, they have quite a lot to do smile
        2. 0
          28 September 2023 11: 12
          Quote from Kartograph
          The priests have nothing to do but remember Pugachev.

          One can agree with some things, there is really nothing more to do, as Emelka and Senka are precisely the names that were used in the rite of anathematization, there is no point in continuing to anathematize, there is no point - they are already outside the Church.
          It should also be taken into account that the proclamation of anathema after 1917 could have resulted in repressive measures, since both Razin and Pugachev were considered the best friends of the peasantry and proletariat.
          It should also be taken into account that the rite of the Triumph of Orthodoxy is not performed in all churches; anathematization is often skipped.
      2. +4
        28 September 2023 10: 46
        Quote: kor1vet1974
        And now you don’t know the names of Pugachev and Razin, they are anathematized in the church.

        No.
        In any case, a priest I knew, from whom I inquired, said that in almost 20 years of being in the priesthood, he had never heard of such a thing.
        1. +4
          28 September 2023 10: 56
          [B]
          No.[
          /b] This is probably a “damned legacy of the Soviet past” smile They will get rid of it...as they say, it’s not yet evening, lest later the list of names subject to anathema increase. The state will say: “It is necessary”! The Russian Orthodox Church will answer: “Yes!” smile
  11. -4
    28 September 2023 07: 43
    Forgive me, Orthodox people...... Stenka Razin said before his execution, and bowed to all four sides, as reported in the previous article.
    Forgive me, Orthodox people......said Emelka Pugachev before his execution, and bowed to all four sides, as it is said in this article.
    Apparently, these episodes are from a series of historical anecdotes.
    1. +7
      28 September 2023 09: 14
      Quote: bober1982
      Apparently, these episodes are from a series of historical anecdotes.

      More like a tradition. A kind of repentance before death.
      In general, traditions can sometimes be quite strange. For example, in Qing China, robbers sentenced to death sang to show their fearlessness.
  12. +12
    28 September 2023 08: 06
    The reaction of the people to the arbitrariness of the authorities, there was nothing left to lose. It’s better to die in battle than to die from such a life.
  13. +9
    28 September 2023 08: 54
    It’s in vain that the author calls Pugachev’s army a horde. A horde, or a gang that has grown to enormous sizes - this is for Razin.
    And here everything was very interesting. A military board in charge of all matters. Regimental division. Participation of a significant number of the nobility as "military experts".
    Does anyone believe that all this could have been organized by an illiterate Cossack?
    1. +3
      28 September 2023 14: 17
      Quote: Moore
      A military board in charge of all matters. Regimental division. Participation of a significant number of the nobility as "military experts".
      Does anyone believe that all this could have been organized by an illiterate Cossack?

      Kovpak, offhand, has no military education.
      And in the Civil War, in general, everyone had atamans of different colors
    2. +2
      28 September 2023 20: 22
      Does anyone believe that all this could have been organized by an illiterate Cossack?


      The Cossacks themselves were quite good military experts because they performed their service regularly and often took part in hostilities.
  14. +4
    28 September 2023 09: 40
    I visited the filming site of the film Russian Riot in the Orenburg region a couple of times. They didn’t demolish the decorations, although they were easily falling apart even without it. You stand on a hill, look at the steppe and all these events seem to become closer... You feel that spirit, expanse and understand why the Cossacks could not easily bow their heads under the yoke. But these are lyrics...
    1. -5
      28 September 2023 10: 34
      Quote: Reader
      I visited the filming site of the film Russian Riot in the Orenburg region a couple of times. They didn’t demolish the decorations, although they were easily falling apart even without it. You stand on a hill, look at the steppe and all these events seem to become closer... You feel that spirit, expanse and understand why the Cossacks could not easily bow their heads under the yoke. But these are lyrics...

      So the Cossacks did not easily bow their heads into civilian life until they were completely destroyed
      1. +6
        28 September 2023 16: 55
        Ha, so what, they destroyed everyone, both the “red” Cossacks and the White Cossacks, who both during the Civil War and the Great Patriotic War were accomplices of the German occupiers of Russia and the USSR?
        1. -3
          28 September 2023 21: 06
          Ha, so what, they destroyed everyone, both the “red” Cossacks and the white Cossacks

          I have a feeling, Irina, that you are absolutely unaware of what Comrade. Stalin did this to the red Cossacks in the 30s, winked
          An unforgivable mistake for an adherent of real Bolsheviks-Leninists request
          He liquidated and liquidated, and in principle, and rightly so, as they say - what they fought for, that’s what they ran into.
          As for the rest of the Cossacks, they were simply in 1921. legally canceled - decossacked. Some were shot, some were imprisoned, some were expelled from their homes. My great-grandfather, who did not participate in the civil war, received five years of correctional labor in 21 just because his cousin died before 1917. served in SEIVK. And the great-grandmother and her small children were exiled to the Tobolsk province. And so, yes, they drank the bitterness to the fullest, but they remained alive and were reunited after the Second World War.
      2. +3
        28 September 2023 19: 07
        So the Cossacks did not easily bow their heads into civilian life until they were completely destroyed
        Well, yes, they destroyed a hundred thousand million. Read the perestroika-era Ogonyok less, or better yet, throw it away. The Orenburg Cossacks were divided approximately in half - front-line soldiers joined the Red Army, rear soldiers joined the White Army. In Orenburg there is still a street of the Red Cossacks, but it has not been renamed.
        1. +2
          28 September 2023 21: 30
          until they were completely destroyed

          Well, this comrade certainly did not act childishly.
  15. +4
    28 September 2023 09: 42
    Russians endure for a long time and harness for a long time. Then how it goes. The Russian rebellion is ruthless and merciless. They have learned their lessons. They created a controlled democracy so that there would be no real elections. But this will not save the system.
    1. -6
      28 September 2023 10: 36
      Quote: Alexander Odintsov
      Russians endure for a long time and harness for a long time. Then how it goes. The Russian rebellion is ruthless and merciless. They have learned their lessons. They created a controlled democracy so that there would be no real elections. But this will not save the system.

      In 17, all the rebellious ones ended in civilian life. The remnants were cleared out in 37
      1. +7
        28 September 2023 16: 56
        Well, yes, but Perestroika again came from somewhere and staged a counter-revolution.
        1. 0
          28 September 2023 21: 36
          Was it not your Secretary General who arranged this restructuring? smile It would be stupid for you personally to distance yourself from this fact, otherwise it turns out like in the famous joke - we read this, but we skip this laughing
  16. +3
    28 September 2023 09: 44
    As a child, visiting my parents, I asked my father why their village was located in a ravine and surrounded by forest, although there was a lot of flat steppe around? The grandmother silently shook her finger, and the grandfather showed his fist... And only later did the father explain that the founders were hiding after the defeat of Pugachev...
    1. +1
      28 September 2023 20: 15
      Quote: VovaVVS
      As a child, visiting my parents, I asked my father why their village was located in a ravine and surrounded by forest, although there was a lot of flat steppe around? The grandmother silently shook her finger, and the grandfather showed his fist... And only later did the father explain that the founders were hiding after the defeat of Pugachev...

      they were afraid for two hundred years after they hid wassat
      1. 0
        29 September 2023 05: 56
        Quote from: nepunamemuk
        they were afraid for two hundred years after they hid

        In the 90s, my grandmother said, “Don’t quarrel with your neighbors, otherwise they’ll write to you!”, even though she was born in 1924 and there were no repressed people.
  17. +4
    28 September 2023 09: 45
    Quote from: FoBoss_VM
    It would be good for the current leaders in the Kremlin to learn the lessons of history. Very useful...

    The current leaders are more afraid of their uncle overseas; their people can still be divorced, but he is not.
    1. Aag
      0
      28 September 2023 21: 25
      Quote: Foma Kinyaev
      Quote from: FoBoss_VM
      It would be good for the current leaders in the Kremlin to learn the lessons of history. Very useful...

      The current leaders are more afraid of their uncle overseas; their people can still be divorced, but he is not.

      if you omit the grammar, - comment, - Cool!! Well, at least it seemed so to me! hi
  18. -1
    28 September 2023 09: 48
    Quote: Moore
    Does anyone believe that all this could have been organized by an illiterate Cossack?

    The Cossacks had a very high level of organization of political, economic and military life. In addition, cavalrymen are the best material for future commanders, as was proven by WWII-Zhukov, Rokossovsky, Eremenko and many others who came from the cavalry.
    1. +4
      28 September 2023 10: 39
      Quote: Foma Kinyaev
      Quote: Moore
      Does anyone believe that all this could have been organized by an illiterate Cossack?

      The Cossacks had a very high level of organization of political, economic and military life. In addition, cavalrymen are the best material for future commanders, as was proven by WWII-Zhukov, Rokossovsky, Eremenko and many others who came from the cavalry.

      Well, yes, well, yes. Cavalrymen are the biggest big heads.
      1. +5
        28 September 2023 19: 10
        Cavalrymen are the most big-headed.
        The most big-headed artillerymen, Napoleon will not let you lie. But maneuver warfare (and this is what the Civil War was like) brought the cavalrymen to the top.
    2. Aag
      +1
      28 September 2023 21: 28
      Quote: Foma Kinyaev
      Quote: Moore
      Does anyone believe that all this could have been organized by an illiterate Cossack?

      The Cossacks had a very high level of organization of political, economic and military life. In addition, cavalrymen are the best material for future commanders, as was proven by WWII-Zhukov, Rokossovsky, Eremenko and many others who came from the cavalry.

      IMHO, it’s very forced, tense... However, there is a similar opinion...
    3. +3
      28 September 2023 22: 18
      Quote: Foma Kinyaev
      The Cossacks had a very high level of organization of political, economic and military life.

      Is Rokossovsky a Cossack?
      1. +1
        29 September 2023 00: 25
        Is Rokossovsky a Cossack?

        No, of course, and neither he nor Zhukov, nor Eremenko, who, although he was born in the Lugansk region, had no relation to the Cossacks - he was from the peasantry. The highest ranks from the Cossack tribe during the Great Patriotic War were achieved by the Hero of the Soviet Union, a native of the Don village of Preobrazhenskaya, Colonel General Vasily Stepanovich Popov.

        My fellow Terek Cossacks also made a worthy contribution to the great victory over Nazi Germany: the permanent commander of the Northern Fleet during the Great Patriotic War, Admiral Arseniy Grigorievich Golovko, Colonel General of Aviation Nikolai Fedorovich Naumenko, Lieutenant General Vasily Grigorievich Terentyev, Rear Admiral Konstantinovich Panteley Tsallagov, Major Generals Mikhail Andreevich Baituganov, Nikolai Matveevich Didenko, Pyotr Mikhailovich Kozlov and many others.
  19. +2
    28 September 2023 09: 51
    Quote: Boris55
    What it is like when power does not belong to the state, we see in the example of Ukraine. At a time when the country is conducting a military training exercise, I consider this article inappropriate and provocative

    Power in Ukraine belongs to the state, only it is overseas. However, the same is true in the Russian Federation.
  20. +4
    28 September 2023 10: 41
    What are the differences between that time and today? The gap between a handful of rich people and the rest of the poor population is enormous and is only growing; some people work two jobs all their lives and have nothing, and around them towns with palaces are growing behind a large fence from the servants. History is taking a turn, and the day is not far off when the patience of the people will also burst and the cottages and estates of rich thieves will go up in flames! Personally, I’ll be happy to do the minimum, but it’s dangerous to write more, the authorities crush any dissent just like in the old days, but you can’t trample against the crowd!
    1. -3
      28 September 2023 14: 22
      Quote: Vadim S
      Personally, I will be at least happy

      Aren’t you afraid that someone won’t like you, or that your wife will like you, or that your apartment is in a good location, or that your car is new?
      No?
      And in vain ..
      With any redistribution of property, so many people come up who want to redistribute Its personal benefit - wow...


      Quote: Vadim S
      It’s dangerous to write more, the authorities crush any dissent
      off the top of my head, only Khodorkovsky, aged 10, and Navalny, aged 19.
      For everyone else, this period is anecdotal - that in the time of Lenin/Stalin he would not have been considered for persecution at all, and certainly not counted as revolutionary experience...
      Comrade revolutionaries were crushed - which of the current ones could, like Kamo, be sentenced to death 4 times or 4 years in a psychiatric hospital???
      That's it.....
      1. +3
        28 September 2023 14: 31
        Quote: your1970
        With any redistribution of property, so many people come up who want to redistribute it for THEIR personal benefit -

        Why is there a redistribution of property - the shoes will be taken off only because they will be new, but the revolutionary’s will be shabby.
        1. 0
          7 October 2023 00: 32
          These armchair left-wingers have loans, mortgages, decent jobs and salaries (yes, I would like more), cars, clothes, entertainment, barbecues, bars, discos, restaurants and other “buzz”. What a revolution this is! Yes, everything will be different if people have nothing to eat and nothing to lose. People are not afraid, people just don’t care yet. Because they are full. Bye.
      2. +5
        28 September 2023 16: 59
        Well, the USSR was captured by those who appropriated state property into personal property. And they themselves did not bother particularly for this - they simply pretended to be supporters of the existing government for decades, and just waited in the wings.
    2. 0
      7 October 2023 00: 26
      People will have nothing to lose when their wallets and refrigerators are empty. And no one here puts much pressure on anyone (if you don’t get into trouble yourself).
  21. +6
    28 September 2023 11: 08
    About "ancient Cossack liberties." At the time of the Pugachev uprising, only 60 years had passed since the uprising of Kondrat Bulavin and the departure of the Nekrasov Cossacks to the Ottoman Empire; the bearers of the memory of the cruel and treacherous reprisals against the Bulavinites were still alive, and how all the interesting trades of the Cossacks were squeezed out by the greedy tsarist commanders.
    The Bashkirs also had their own truth - they were shamelessly deceived, promising them practically a federation with the preservation of all pastures and way of life for them, but gradually squeezing out everything promised and given.
    I won’t even mention the serf times of Saltychikha and the lordly lawlessness.
    So there were conditions for rebellion, and many were created by inflexible and deceitful domestic policies, including the Great ones - Peter and Catherine.
    Those in power have always fiercely confused power with truth, and have not gotten rid of this to this day, unfortunately, only now the war is forcing us once again to bring these concepts closer together - otherwise it’s kirdyk!
  22. +8
    28 September 2023 11: 50
    How famously the author connected the Pugachev uprising with 1917, most importantly not with February, but with October, when there was no power at all in the Russian Empire. Probably from the “historian” Medinsky’s club.
    1. +5
      28 September 2023 13: 43
      You shouldn't be doing that. These are all folk epics about the Serpent Gorynych and Kashchei.....
      And about “the power was lying around somewhere there...”

      In June 1917, the 1st All-Russian Congress of Soviets was held, which legitimized the power of the Kerensky government. On September 1, 1917, Russia was declared a Republic. In October 1917 - the Second All-Russian Congress of Soviets, which arrested the old government and legitimized Lenin's government..

      But in recent history... Yes... Surrealism.....
      December 1991—three dudes cancel the USSR at night in the Belovezhya forest.

      October 1993 one guy shoots the All-Russian Congress of People's Deputies from tanks. The tankers were not ordered anything, but were paid a thousand bucks each.....

      March 1996 - The State Duma declares Yeltsin's actions criminal offenses, but our blessed people recognize him as president once again.

      And of course, Karl Marx and Zyuganov are to blame for all this.... Well, even before the heap, Lenin laid a mine.

      Good sir - a hundred years ago people in Russia were normal!!! They're crazy now... laughing
  23. +4
    28 September 2023 13: 56
    an abscess burst through deepest Russia

    The author calls the righteous anger of the Russian people an “abscess.”

    The abscess in Russia is the rule of traitors and fools.
    The reign of Catherine2 was just like that.
    She enslaved the Russian people by giving liberties and complete immunity to the noble class. All her activities consisted of romances and marriage games with her favorites.

    Shame on the author.
    1. +4
      28 September 2023 14: 18
      All her activities consisted of romances and marriage games with her favorites.
      It is worth noting that not everyone, although she loved to play around, did a lot for the Empire.
    2. +2
      28 September 2023 18: 58
      Great words! All this is patriotic so that the servants are not distracted by the masters and stand for them to the death. But the rich and their degenerates are untouchable and continue to get richer.
  24. -1
    28 September 2023 16: 15
    Quote: Foma Kinyaev
    Quote: Moore
    Does anyone believe that all this could have been organized by an illiterate Cossack?

    The Cossacks had a very high level of organization of political, economic and military life. In addition, cavalrymen are the best material for future commanders, as was proven by WWII-Zhukov, Rokossovsky, Eremenko and many others who came from the cavalry.

    Operation Mars is a bright manifestation of Zhukov’s talents, Eremenko doesn’t seem to have shown himself at all, so the theory turns out to be somewhat weak.
  25. -3
    28 September 2023 16: 18
    Quote: RussianPatriot
    an abscess burst through deepest Russia

    The author calls the righteous anger of the Russian people an “abscess.”

    The abscess in Russia is the rule of traitors and fools.
    The reign of Catherine2 was just like that.
    She enslaved the Russian people by giving liberties and complete immunity to the noble class. All her activities consisted of romances and marriage games with her favorites.

    Shame on the author.

    You also need to be able to find a smart favorite so that he can effectively manage for you.
    1. -3
      28 September 2023 18: 18
      They effectively controlled only their horseradish in bed with Katya
  26. +4
    28 September 2023 19: 34
    What did the author want to say besides well-known facts? The article is contradictory and correspondingly false. Pugachev's uprising was a reaction to the strengthening of serfdom in feudal Russia at that time. The author approaches the topic from the point of view of the Russian nobility and the ruling class of today. You see, the mob has rebelled. The cattle raised their hands against the masters. Everything is in the spirit of the views of the President of the Russian Federation. Superficial, hypocritical, forced and deceitful.
    1. -2
      29 September 2023 06: 29
      Quote: oleg Pesotsky
      Pugachev's rebellion was a reaction to the strengthening of serfdom in feudal Russia at that time

      Then the Tambov uprising is a “reaction to the strengthening” of what????!!!
      Asya ???
      You have everything
      Quote: oleg Pesotsky
      Superficial, hypocritical, forced and deceitful.
  27. Ray
    +2
    28 September 2023 20: 50
    And not a word in the article about Salavat Yulaev.
    But by the third stage of the war, when the main forces of the Cossacks were defeated and their mobilization reserves had dried up, the war continued. And it continued precisely at the expense of the Bashkirs, who by the third stage made up 2/3 of the peasant army. At the first stage, the Bashkirs made up a third. It’s just that the “mobilization reserve,” so to speak, of the Bashkirs was higher due to their numbers.
  28. +1
    28 September 2023 22: 11
    With Samsonov, the Bolsheviks are always to blame, Her Majesty, like that Rafik, “is not to blame.”
  29. 0
    29 September 2023 19: 59
    Comrade author keeps thinking that in history it’s like in personal relationships: I love/I don’t love. However, personal relationships are far from history.
  30. +1
    29 September 2023 20: 53
    The author did not specify what he meant by the disaster of 1917. It seems that he is a monarchist, since he regrets that the rotten monarchy has collapsed. And how he pities Catherine II, who was not “able” to go against the nobility. This is with absolute power!
    1. 0
      9 October 2023 10: 28
      So her hubby also had absolute power. And where did he end up?