Military Review

T-55: How an obsolete tank will be useful in NWO

47
T-55: How an obsolete tank will be useful in NWO

A wide discussion was caused by the personnel of the trains that were transported to the NVO zone Tanks T-55, removed from the "conservation". Some of our fellow citizens even had a "panic", they say - everything weapons no, they send "junk" to the front. But, everything is not so simple here.


However, before talking about the likely functions that will be assigned to the T-55 in the NVO zone, let's start with what kind of car it is.

The medium Soviet tank went into mass production in 1958. Until 1979, 23600 units were produced, which made this armored vehicle one of the most massive in the world. About 10 countries became tank operators.

It is worth noting that one of the important features of the T-55 was dictated by the "nuclear race" between the US and the USSR.

In this regard, the hull and turret of the armored vehicle became airtight, and inside it was possible to create excess pressure so that radioactive dust would not enter.

Regarding the armor of the T-55, it, as well as in its predecessor T-54, has become differentiated. That is, in places of the greatest threat to the tank, the armor was strengthened. But this happened due to its decrease in other areas.

For example, the forehead of the hull was protected by 100 mm rolled steel armor, and the lower part of the stern was protected by 20 mm. At the same time, the armor thickness of the cast turret ranged from 70 to 200 mm.

A 55-horsepower engine was installed on the T-580, which allowed the 36-ton car to accelerate on the highway up to 50 km / h and up to 27 km / h along the “crossroads”.

But the main thing is the gun of the tank, which received a rifled 100-mm D-10T2S gun. It is she who is one of the most likely reasons for sending an obsolete car to the NWO zone.

The fact is that in the current confrontation there are very few tank duels. The latter are often used as mobile artillery weapons.

So, the use of the T-55 from closed positions will allow delivering accurate strikes (thanks to the rifled gun) at a distance of up to 13 km (with a hinged trajectory). These tanks can be an excellent means of destroying enemy manpower and lightly armored vehicles.

At the same time, unlike towed artillery, in the conditions of active and operational reconnaissance of the enemy, the T-55 will be able to work out on given targets and quickly change the firing position.

47 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Ross xnumx
    Ross xnumx 10 August 2023 14: 54
    -1
    The Soviet current analogue of the "Coalition-SV".
    fellow
    The main thing is that they can shoot and move....
    1. Saburov_Alexander53
      Saburov_Alexander53 10 August 2023 18: 28
      +7
      Interestingly, when in the past I suggested just such a possibility of using the T-55 and T-62 as artillery self-propelled guns, and not in tank battles, I was downvoted in the trash ... And then I look, my views have changed and the critics have diminished ... And what happened in these six months? request
      1. Dart2027
        Dart2027 10 August 2023 19: 29
        +1
        Quote: Saburov_Alexander53
        when in the past I suggested just such a possibility of using the T-55 and T-62 as artillery self-propelled guns, and not in tank battles, I was thrown into the trash

        Similarly.
      2. bayard
        bayard 11 August 2023 09: 49
        +1
        Quote: Saburov_Alexander53
        And then I look, the views have changed and the critics have diminished ... And what happened during these six months?

        The realization came that in a war everything that can shoot, and for which there is ammunition, should shoot.
      3. Arkady Pakhomov
        Arkady Pakhomov 13 August 2023 12: 08
        0
        Me too. Magnificent 100 mm gun. Powerful high-explosive projectile. Excellent firing range - 14,5 km Long barrel life. In terms of armor protection, it surpasses Acacia and Carnation.
        1. URAL72
          URAL72 14 August 2023 17: 46
          0
          I would not compare it with Carnation and Acacia, but with the Terminator and BMP. It is they who perform the functions of supporting infantry and tanks. Here the T-55, having a caliber like the BMP-3, has much better armor. But the terminator is definitely better. But where can you get so many of them in a short time and at practically no cost?
      4. hagen
        hagen 14 August 2023 12: 41
        0
        Quote: Saburov_Alexander53
        Interestingly, when in the past I suggested just such a possibility of using the T-55 and T-62 as artillery self-propelled guns, and not in tank battles, I was downvoted in the trash ... And then I look, my views have changed and the critics have diminished ... And what happened in these six months?

        Nothing happened. It's just that you are in a resource that does not have professional analysts capable of evaluating non-obvious ideas. Here are ordinary people with a very average, as a rule, education ..... laughing
      5. Andrei Nikolaevich
        Andrei Nikolaevich 14 August 2023 16: 37
        0
        But I didn’t panic at all, but I thought that the generals in this matter are smarter than me.)
    2. The comment was deleted.
  2. air wolf
    air wolf 10 August 2023 14: 58
    0
    And that we have run out of Carnations? That one will be more interesting and a more powerful shot and range.
    1. isv000
      isv000 10 August 2023 15: 07
      +4
      Quote: air wolf
      And that we have run out of Carnations? That one will be more interesting and a more powerful shot and range.

      And where to put these, again for conservation? In 2014, the men in the Donbass removed the IS from the pedestal, started the engine, installed a machine gun and notably trolled the horses, dismantling several checkpoints along the way.
      1. Uncle lee
        Uncle lee 10 August 2023 15: 17
        0
        Quote: isv000
        back to conservation?

        And for me, at least "Katyusha" on Studder! If only the Nazis were smashed!
        1. Mavrikiy
          Mavrikiy 12 August 2023 05: 10
          -3
          Quote from Uncle Lee
          And for me, at least "Katyusha" on Studder! If only the Nazis were smashed!

          Not everything is so simple, dear ... hi Katyusha, this is good, but how long will she live on the battlefield and the "crew of the combat vehicle." Modern similar systems are more mobile and more long-range, and this is survivability ... request Our MO seems to be preoccupied with saving money and agree to pay with the blood of soldiers. request Instead of promoting the military-industrial complex to fight the West, poultices also prefer resuscitation. fool
      2. Escariot
        Escariot 11 August 2023 00: 09
        +2
        And what to do with the checkers forged under the tsar? Let's give you and send her into battle
        1. Mamin-Sibiryak
          Mamin-Sibiryak 12 August 2023 06: 41
          -2
          You write everything correctly. Three-rulers, DP-27 and PTRD have already been issued to the militiamen of Donbass before. Well good to disappear? Maybe Rdultovsky's grenades were still lying around in the warehouse.
      3. NeRTT
        NeRTT 11 August 2023 02: 58
        0
        Well, yes, they significantly trolled .. soldier There I remember not only one IP was removed from the pedestal !!
      4. Arkady Pakhomov
        Arkady Pakhomov 13 August 2023 12: 10
        0
        Gvozdik has anti-bullet (anti-fragmentation) armor, which is easily penetrated by fragments of a 150 mm gun.
    2. svp67
      svp67 10 August 2023 17: 07
      +3
      Quote: air wolf
      And that we have run out of Carnations?

      And who is firing shells for her now? What was already heavily spent, but there are still 100-mm shells and they are enough for at least a year of hostilities
      And the presented story about the "truth of life" made me laugh a little. Did the author think that while telling a story about the T-55, he stands and often then shows the T-54?
      1. Grossvater
        Grossvater 10 August 2023 18: 01
        0
        The sailors use hundreds, given that the D10 fires shots from the B34, it seems that ammunition is still being produced today.
  3. dmi.pris1
    dmi.pris1 10 August 2023 15: 00
    -3
    Chassis for "Solntsepeka"? Not?
  4. Novel_
    Novel_ 10 August 2023 15: 04
    -6
    1. ... at a distance of up to 13 km ... - what will be the dispersion ???
    2. Again the generals will distort everything - as artillery it is justified, but there is a but. According to the documents, this is a TANK !!! and our brave general (as I see it) will use it as it is written in a piece of paper / charter.
    1. Grossvater
      Grossvater 10 August 2023 18: 07
      +1
      Hm! Does it mean that the BS 3 (3,6 tons), which bounces with each shot with accuracy, is fine, but the 35 ton tank has no accuracy?
    2. Alekseev
      Alekseev 12 August 2023 06: 52
      0
      'generals, it is written in a piece of paper..'
      Some kind of bolt-fuck, not a reasonable thought.
      Or is it possible to fight seriously without "generals", that is, trained military leaders? Or does the presence of incapable peacetime military leaders mean that "any cook" or couch talker can control the troops?
      Much has already been written about the T-55 and T-62. Serviceable weapons and ammunition, although outdated, were used always and everywhere where high-intensity hostilities were fought.
      And these tanks can be reasonably used as self-propelled guns closer to the front line, where lightly armored self-propelled guns will be
      "uncomfortable", and if "wrapped" properly in remote sensing and screens, put a thermal imager and give a modern r / st as an assault weapon. That is, almost MBT.
      Another thing is that old vehicles must be passed through a tank repair plant, and not transferred to the front directly from storage.
  5. Kostadinov
    Kostadinov 10 August 2023 15: 07
    +2
    So, the use of the T-55 from closed positions will make it possible to deliver accurate strikes (thanks to the rifled gun) at a distance of up to 13 km (with a hinged trajectory).

    With the addition of some position tilt, you can shoot at a maximum of 20 kilometers.
  6. Gomunkul
    Gomunkul 10 August 2023 15: 09
    +1
    So, the use of the T-55 from closed positions will make it possible to deliver accurate strikes (thanks to the rifled gun) at a distance of up to 13 km (with a hinged trajectory).
    I will give an alternative opinion for what T-55s can be used in the NWO zone:
    The strength of the T-55 was its rifled 100-mm D-102TS gun, which until recently was considered hopelessly outdated. The D-102TS cannon is distinguished by excellent ballistics and combat accuracy. At a distance of 1000 meters, a high-explosive fragmentation projectile hits the point at which the gunner was aiming. In fact, the T-55 is a large-caliber sniper weapon protected by thick armor.
    hi
  7. Vadim S
    Vadim S 10 August 2023 15: 12
    +5
    As a mobile checkpoint, as part of a system of defensive structures, as a self-propelled rapier :))) why not, where to put them, they will rot at the bases, but still the gun is superfluous in the ranks!
    1. Escariot
      Escariot 11 August 2023 00: 11
      0
      If you have a tank in your state, then it is desirable that it be a normal tank, and not a rarity. If you don’t have a tank in your state, then who will supply this rarity?
  8. Wer best do
    Wer best do 10 August 2023 15: 33
    -8
    In a year, we should probably wait for an article called
    T-34: How an obsolete tank will be useful in NWO
    1. Aken
      Aken 10 August 2023 16: 07
      0
      You late. Remember, a few years ago they bought a T-34 from Laos? Banderlog has already shown their transportation to Russia as being sent to the front.
    2. Kronos
      Kronos 11 August 2023 16: 14
      -3
      And then: why the cart is no worse than a modern armored personnel carrier.
  9. Reluctant volunteer
    Reluctant volunteer 10 August 2023 18: 07
    -2
    So, the use of the T-55 from closed positions will make it possible to deliver accurate strikes (thanks to the rifled gun) at a distance of up to 13 km (with a hinged trajectory)

    But the fact that the tank does not have a sight for shooting from closed positions does not bother the author of this opus? Although, given that many of our motorized rifle brigades have long become just rifle brigades, tk. they don’t have armored vehicles at all, then the T-55 will do for something, it will be able to divert fire at least for a couple of minutes. It’s a pity for the crews, of course, but in war as in war ...
    1. Repellent
      Repellent 10 August 2023 18: 14
      -1
      Quote: Reluctant volunteer
      And the fact of the absence from the word in general of a sight for firing from closed positions at the tank

      Ahem ... and where did you put the side level? belay laughing
      1. The comment was deleted.
  10. Victor Masyuk
    Victor Masyuk 10 August 2023 18: 24
    0
    Since the tanks were mothballed, and not cut into metal, it means that the Ministry of Defense had plans to use them. It is logical that in the current situation everything that can still be useful should be used. At the same time, warehouses will be freed ...
    1. 1 z1
      1 z1 10 August 2023 20: 57
      -3
      it means that the Ministry of Defense had plans for their use.

      Quite the contrary, if officials from the Moscow Region had plans for t54-55, then there would be nothing to re-open
  11. Reluctant volunteer
    Reluctant volunteer 10 August 2023 18: 29
    -1
    Quote: Repellent
    Quote: Reluctant volunteer
    And the fact of the absence from the word in general of a sight for firing from closed positions at the tank

    Ahem ... and where did you put the side level? belay laughing

    And what about the level? And although not, let's do it differently, tell me a sight for firing HE at a calculated range of 10200, for example. And what is there, by the way, in tanks with a goniometer, remind ....
    1. Vladislav Volokhov
      Vladislav Volokhov 10 August 2023 21: 16
      0
      Banned on google? In 2 minutes I found the tables.
      Since when was the tower goniometer screwed up?
    2. Repellent
      Repellent 10 August 2023 21: 26
      +1
      Quote: Reluctant volunteer
      And what about the level?

      Yes, with the same laughing

      Quote: Reluctant volunteer
      tell me a sight for firing HE at a calculated range of 10200, for example

      Why is it for me? They will bring it to me, centrally, as part of a unit.

      Quote: Reluctant volunteer
      And what is there by the way in tanks with a protractor

      It's sad there with a goniometer. But there is still an azimuth indicator Yes laughing
  12. wladimirjankov
    wladimirjankov 10 August 2023 18: 34
    -2
    it seems that the army pulled the T-55 out of mothballs not from a good life. If this ancient tank was forced to be used, it means that there are not enough more modern t-72, 80, 90. Or there really were not enough shells of 120, 152 calibers for our artillery and decided to at least somehow compensate for this due to 100 and 110 mm shells for t -55, t-62. With such a mediocre use of artillery at the beginning of the NWO, this may well be. Therefore, as a temporary measure, it is justified. It's better to have something than nothing at all. If our military-industrial complex manages to increase the production of shells of the required calibers, the DPRK will help us a little, and finally our artillerymen will learn how to use them correctly, then the need for obsolete tanks will disappear.
  13. Reluctant volunteer
    Reluctant volunteer 10 August 2023 19: 41
    -1
    Quote: wladimirjankov
    The DPRK will help us a little, and finally our gunners will learn how to use them correctly ...


    My friend, on the fourth gun in my battery I shot 6 with horseradish thousand, the barrel is cool there, without rifling already, maybe you will come to us near Bakhmut for another day and teach us how to use it correctly?
    1. Escariot
      Escariot 11 August 2023 00: 14
      -2
      Taxi drivers without rifling have been shooting for so many years and nothing, but you are spreading alarmism.
  14. Lord Zedd
    Lord Zedd 10 August 2023 19: 47
    0
    IMHO, but using from closed positions has a number of disadvantages: insufficient maneuverability, short range, etc. It seems that the people from Wagner were right, because they got the M-1 guns (1943, range up to 12.5 km only). Lots of vids. I really hope that people at the top will rely not on the mass character of such artillery (the range is less than that of NATO models, the accuracy is also worse, which is very sad), but on the development of systems like tornadoes, but here it is necessary to develop a satellite constellation, which is associated with big problems in electronics (this is all pure IMHO, maybe someone will enlighten me)

    UPD: for people throwing dizas: please write, what am I wrong about? For me, this is not stubbornness, from any point of view, but an opportunity to gain new knowledge and experience. Therefore, write what you think. IMHO, the counter-battery rests on hurricanes and lancets. What do you think?
  15. Alexander Emrys
    Alexander Emrys 10 August 2023 21: 30
    +1
    - the Germans give Leopard 1 - "fu, junk, a target for our fighters"

    - we throw the T-55 into battle - "and our old man, but he still fights cool"

    the logic of sofa "patriots" is understandable - they can't burn in an old tank, they have age and sciatica, and the war is like a live world of tanks live. but they are disgusting to watch. to mobilize this old people and send them to the T-55 to fight, even though they would burn "with honor", as they like to broadcast
  16. Reluctant volunteer
    Reluctant volunteer 10 August 2023 22: 27
    +1
    Quote: Repellent

    Why is it for me? They will bring it to me, centrally, as part of a unit.

    How will you get it if you don't have it? What is the elevation angle you are measuring? In parrots? What tables? Lotto cards?

    Quote: Repellent

    It's sad there with a goniometer. But there is still an azimuth indicator Yes laughing

    Yeah, if you shoot according to the principle "well, somewhere there" then it will go ...
    1. Repellent
      Repellent 10 August 2023 22: 39
      0
      Quote: Reluctant volunteer
      How will you get it if you don't have it?

      That's how nervous you are. Well, it's better to see...


      Here it is. Please love and respect Yes laughing

      Here's another. From 2.45 approximately in the video. The aforementioned azimuth indicator has been seen many times before, at the bottom left, round like that.

  17. pavelpavel
    pavelpavel 11 August 2023 13: 02
    0
    With ventilation, 4 people would still be protected from drones. But the army of the GDR demonstrated good qualities in Prague at 68!
  18. AdAstra
    AdAstra 11 August 2023 14: 57
    -1
    Leave Grandpa alone." """
  19. Mamin-Sibiryak
    Mamin-Sibiryak 12 August 2023 06: 37
    0
    Isn't self-propelled guns more appropriate for such purposes? Or did the USSR mainly rivet tanks, and self-propelled guns did much less?
  20. Hassan Shamoyan
    Hassan Shamoyan 14 August 2023 09: 04
    0
    Obsolete ... google it, it is still the main one in many countries. In addition, the potential for modernization has not yet been exhausted. In the USSR, they did things over which time has no power, they are always relevant. As an example, the Niva car, it’s impossible to think of a better one