Sapozhkov's uprising: how Chapaev's ally opposed the Bolsheviks

58
Sapozhkov's uprising: how Chapaev's ally opposed the Bolsheviks
Alexander Sapozhkov


During the years of the Civil War, major uprisings against the Bolsheviks occurred not only among the peasants, but sometimes among the regular units of the Red Army. And this is not surprising, given that the majority of the Red Army soldiers of that period are the same immigrants from the peasantry, like the Tambov, Siberian or Yekaterinoslav rebels. Many red commanders also came from peasants, who also managed to gain rich combat experience on the fields of the First World War.



One of these uprisings took place in the Samara province under the leadership of the red commander Alexander Sapozhkov. Explaining to the people the goals of the uprising that had begun, Sapozhkov wrote in one of his first appeals:

“We want to force the government to listen to our voice and your groan, to see those prisons and places of detention that are packed full of us, and change the policy in the way the country is run. If this government is really people's power, then it will understand us, and hear, and make our life easier, but if it does not listen to us, then this government does not want good for the people and indulges its enemies, and the consequences for further struggle will fall on it.

About three thousand people took part in the uprising - about the same as in the Decembrist uprising in St. Petersburg. However, almost every schoolchild today knows about the Decembrists, tons of literature have been written about them, dozens of films have been shot, but only specialized specialists know about Sapozhkov’s uprising, there are few scientific works on the topic, and there are no fiction books or films at all.

And this despite the fact that Sapozhkov’s troops showed greater efficiency than the Decembrists: they were defeated in a few hours, while Sapozhkov’s Bolsheviks, having a multiple numerical advantage, could not defeat his associates for two months, and then another two years.

We will tell you about what did not suit the actions of the authorities and the command of the red division commander, how the uprising went and how it ended.

Red divisional commander and associate of Chapaev


The commander of the 9th Cavalry Division Alexander Vasilievich Sapozhkov came from the peasants of the Samara province. During the First World War, he fought at the front, rose to the rank of second lieutenant, and in 1917 returned to his native Novouzensky district, where he actively participated in revolutionary events. In fact, it was thanks to Sapozhkov that the power of the Bolsheviks was established in the district.

In May 1918, Sapozhkov became a member of the Samara provincial committee. At the same time, he assembled a detachment of local peasants, which soon became a brigade as part of the 4th Army of the Eastern Front. In the neighboring Nikolaevsky district, the same brigade was assembled by Sapozhkov's acquaintance Vasily Chapaev, and it also became part of the same 4th Army.

The brigades of Sapozhkov and Chapaev fought with the Cossacks and the people's army of Komuch, then with the troops of Kolchak. In January 1919, in the 22nd division, which included Sapozhkov's brigade, there was a mutiny of several regiments, during which many commanders and commissars were killed. After that, the former division commander Dementiev was removed from his post, and Sapozhkov took his place.

As commander of the 22nd division, Sapozhkov withstood an 1919-day siege in Uralsk in April-July 80. The city was completely surrounded by the White Cossack army of General Tolstov, but despite this, Sapozhkov continued to resist. In those days, he even received a telegram from Lenin, in which he said that if Uralsk held out, then the republic would not forget him, Sapozhkov. Uralsk survived, in July the 25th division of Chapaev arrived to help and lifted the siege.


Medal in honor of the 50th anniversary of the defense of Uralsk

Later, Sapozhkov's division was transferred to the Southern Front. However, soon, for reasons unclear to the end, its commander was removed from his post and sent back to the Samara province to form new units. The official dry wording was that the removal from office was "for inept command and for a corrupt policy." Under the "corrupting policy", most likely, they meant agitation in the division against the surplus appraisal and for free trade, which went against the dogmas of the Bolshevik ideology.

Arriving in his native land, Sapozhkov did not calm down and tried on the ground to stop the forced surplus appropriation and allow free trade, but to no avail. Seeing this, the command again transferred him from Novouzensky to Buzuluksky district, but he has not yet been removed from the post of commander of the emerging 9th cavalry division.

The new division was formed partly from Red Cossacks who had gone over to the side, and partly from Chapaev's recent associates from the 25th division. For all command positions, Sapozhkov placed people loyal to him who were with him during the defense of Uralsk.

And then one day something happened that Sapozhkov was most afraid of: on July 4, 1920, an order came to remove him from the post of division commander. This time without a new appointment.

The beginning of the uprising


Upon learning of his displacement, Sapozhkov first tried to negotiate with the commander of the Zavolzhsky military district, Konstantin Avksentevsky, but in vain. Then he decided to use force.

On July 13, in the village of Pogromnoye, not far from Buzuluk, Sapozhkov gathered the commanders of his division, explained the current situation to them, after which it was decided to start an uprising. The next day, at a rally, this was announced to the rank and file of the division. Sapozhkov renamed his division into the 1st Red Army of Pravda. The rebels stormed Buzuluk and took it in just an hour. The support of the local population played an important role in this. A. Bulyshev, an employee of the Samara Gubchek, reported:

“The mood among the masses of the population of the city of Buzuluk - everything is on their side, especially in the villages among the peasantry, where I had to observe among the inhabitants of the village. Glapanovka, where police officers were beaten to death and armed catching of fleeing Soviet workers in the nearby forest is being carried out ...
The ultimate goal of the rebels is to conquer the province of Samara up to the Volga.

It is also important that during the Sapozhkov uprising, the slogan "Soviets without communists" was first put forward. It immediately gained popularity far beyond the Volga region, and in the following months was used by the rebels in many other regions.

In the taken Buzuluk, Sapozhkov released most of the prisoners (except for those who were imprisoned under especially serious articles) and announced mobilization into his army. There were no executions in the city, some of the captured Soviet workers and Red Army soldiers voluntarily went over to the side of the rebels. Those who refused were thrown into prison.

There are records of Sapozhkov's conversations with arrested Soviet workers. In them, the divisional commander noted that military experts were enslaving the army, Soviet officials had become bourgeois, lived in privileged conditions, and their wives wore diamonds. On the foreign policy of the Bolsheviks, Sapozhkov said that it had become predatory in relation to Poland, with which peace should have been negotiated.

But most of all, the divisional commander criticized the food policy of the Bolsheviks: the surplus appropriation is accompanied by unthinkable violence, local communists commit crimes, while reporting to their superiors about their successes.

The Bolshevik local authorities learned about the beginning of the uprising on its very first day. Already on the evening of July 14, the Samara Provincial Executive Committee sent a detachment against Sapozhkov, another detachment was sent by the Orenburg Provincial Committee. In total, more than 14 thousand infantry and cavalry with 89 machine guns and 46 guns were sent against the rebels in the following days. These forces were led by Avksentievskiy. At the same time, there were several times fewer rebels themselves and those who joined them.


K. Avksentievskiy

On July 16, troops loyal to the Bolsheviks took Buzuluk. Sapozhkov retreated to the southwest, his division did not lose its combat capability and continued to be replenished at the expense of local peasants. In addition to the peasants, deserters from the Red Army and the Ural Cossacks also joined it.
Local authorities reported to the center:

“The farther he moves south, the more sympathy Sapozhkov meets among the population, and the more successful his mobilization. Sapozhkova is happy here, we are afraid and hated. The further Sapozhkov moves, the harder it will be to fight him.

Despite the fact that there were five times more troops sent against Sapozhkov than the rebels, and 11 times more in terms of machine guns and artillery, they could not beat him for a long time. In his reports to his superiors, Avksentievskii explained this by the fact that Sapozhkov mainly had cavalry, which his foot soldiers simply could not keep up with. However, the support of the local population also played a significant role here, thanks to which Sapozhkov always knew where the large detachments of the Bolsheviks were.


Cavalry detachment of the Red Army

The end of the uprising


On July 28, Trotsky telegraphed to Avksentievskii:

“The rebellion of Sapozhkov must be liquidated as soon as possible. The culprits from top to bottom must be mercilessly punished. Wide-ranging kulak uprisings are possible in the area under your jurisdiction. They can only be warned by giving an unforgettable lesson to all the elements that directly or indirectly supported Sapozhkov's rebellion. Punishment should be extended not only to command personnel, but also to soldiers.
If you consider it useful, go yourself to the area of ​​liquidation of the rebellion. The dissemination of proclamations by planes in the region of the uprising is useful. In these appeals you could say that you have received an order to shoot any insurgent captured from weapons in hand".

Avksentevsky instructed the suppression of the uprising to his subordinates, and at that time he indulged in drunkenness. Later, it was for alcoholism that he would be removed from all positions.

In early August, Sapozhkov divided the detachment into two parts. The first was sent to storm Uralsk, the second was led by himself and tried to take his native city of Novouzensk. He stormed it twice, but to no avail, since the garrison of the city was significantly reinforced after the start of the uprising. Uralsk also repulsed all the assaults, however, during the siege, several hundred Red Army soldiers from the garrison went over to the side of the rebels.

It is worth saying that during the confrontation, the rank and file of both sides quite often went over to the side of the enemy, and when he was defeated in the next battle, they could go back.

In one of the battles on August 8, Sapozhkov's wife Daria, who had followed her husband since the beginning of the uprising, was captured. At first, the Bolsheviks wanted to shoot her, but then they decided to spare her, because if one of the Red commanders was captured, she could be used for exchange. Whether Daria was eventually left alive or not is unknown, the sources do not report anything more about her.

Sapozhkov himself, without taking either Novouzensk or Uralsk, retreated with fighting to the south, in the steppe of the Astrakhan province. On September 6, in one of the battles, he died, participating in the attack in the forefront of his now small detachment.

The remnants of his army, divided into small detachments, fled in different directions. Some of his associates were eventually captured and shot, while others continued to fight for a long time.

So, Sapozhkov's colleague Vasily Serov first disappeared, and in April 1921 raised a new uprising and fought the Bolsheviks until August 1922, until his detachment was defeated.
58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    5 July 2023 04: 38
    in yesterday’s commentary after the article about Mussolini and Kornilov, he wondered who was next disguisedly but intrusively and stubbornly, they would be compared with Prigozhin and, they say, a rebellion, would be shoved into world history as an example of one of the many ways how it worked or didn’t work with such methods to achieve power. How he looked into the water! Today, a certain Sapozhkov has already been dragged into the light of day, for the same purpose ...
    1. +5
      5 July 2023 04: 54
      It's a civil war...
      the rank and file of both sides quite often went over to the side of the enemy
    2. +7
      5 July 2023 08: 54
      Today, a certain Sapozhkov has already been dragged into the light of day, for the same purpose
      To be honest, I didn’t know about Sapozhkov, and it was interesting for me to get acquainted with another episode from the history of our country (thanks to the author).
      For what purpose the author used this article, only the author himself can say, but we can only guess, and this, as you know, is not a thankful task.
      What conclusion can be drawn after reading this article? In my opinion, the main message is that if a country in a long war with an external enemy does not achieve victory over it, then there is a high probability of a civil war (distemper) within the country and the main cause of this turmoil is the deterioration of the welfare of the civilian population, and those returning from foreign war, already former front-line soldiers, seeing the plight of their families and that injustice on the part of the authorities in relation to ordinary citizens, they resort to solving the problem in their usual way through an armed struggle against this government. hi
      1. -1
        6 September 2023 15: 20
        Quote: Gomunkul
        To be honest, I didn’t know about Sapozhkov, and I was interested in learning about another episode from the history of our country

        Yes, there were many such episodes among both the Reds and the Whites. Each acted in accordance with their views and dreams.
        But comparison with the Decembrists is out of place. They stood still, but Sapozhkov acted maneuverably
    3. +5
      5 July 2023 10: 54
      Believe it or not, this article was written before Prigogine's rebellion and has nothing to do with it. Initially, I planned to publish it on another site, but since the editors there were stupid for two weeks, I decided to post it here.
      In general, if many of the events of those years, the same Kornilov rebellion, very much resemble current events, then this is an unkind sign, colleagues. This means that we are now entering an era very similar to that one.
      1. +5
        5 July 2023 11: 07
        This is not a good sign, colleagues. This means that we are now entering an era very similar to that one.

        We entered it a long time ago, only the stay in power of the "Provisional Government" was indecently dragged out.
        And thanks for the article, Andrew. smile
      2. +7
        5 July 2023 11: 15
        In general, if many of the events of those years, the same Kornilov rebellion, very much resemble current events, then this is an unkind sign, colleagues. This means that we are now entering an era very similar to that one.
        I agree with you. Also, as a reminder, I will quote the words of the American philosopher, poet and essayist George Santayana (1863-1952).
        Those who do not remember their past are doomed to relive it.
      3. +6
        5 July 2023 14: 40
        The idea of ​​a Peasant's Paradise, in which a peasant can starve an urban worker to death with "free prices" for bread, is a matter familiar even to us....

        Even in Soviet times, my relatives from the Sumy region loved to gossip on the topic: "if something goes wrong, the man will live ... But you city people will cry." laughing

        But fools could not understand that in the modern world, the city is the head of everything and "if something is wrong" - - the heads will quickly turn away the lovers of "Peasant Paradise" .......

        We see that if the people themselves have thought of what Idea, they will cling to it to death, no matter how fascist nonsense it may be.

        And therefore, I do not condemn the authorities too much, even the current ones .... "My brother" - he may turn out to be worse than Hitler if he does not go into the snout in time ....

        1. -1
          6 September 2023 15: 26
          Quote: ivan2022
          if something is wrong, the man will live ... But you city people will cry

          Well, there is some truth here. Only before a man could live in the forest without electricity and gas, but now you can’t prepare firewood for free
  2. +10
    5 July 2023 04: 52
    A characteristic feature of the Reds: against a common enemy (Whites) - they act together, internecine showdowns - later. Whites are exactly the opposite. So, did the Ural Cossacks join Sapozhkov? And some say that by that time they had all gone to the Caspian Sea ... The rebels opposed the surplus appraisal - but how did they themselves act in the subject territory? Did you enter yours? So did many!
    1. +11
      5 July 2023 05: 28
      Did you enter yours?
      On the porch stood laughing They will knock out the Reds, distribute grain to the peasants, gather at the village, rural, church and stand with outstretched hand, they say, give them food, we saved you from the food requisition. smile
      1. +5
        5 July 2023 08: 04
        Quote: parusnik
        stand with an outstretched hand, they say, give me food, we saved you from the food appropriation.

        If. During the Siberian uprising, the so-called. "people's power", having overthrown the Bolsheviks, introduced a surplus appraisal not only for bread and vegetables, but also for cranberries! And also created a counterintelligence department to identify dissidents ...
        1. 0
          5 July 2023 13: 43
          Quote: Sahar Medovich
          And also created a counterintelligence department to identify dissidents ...

          Yeah. Lyova Zadov, the head of counterintelligence, Old Man Makhno, would have laughed.
          1. +2
            5 July 2023 15: 00
            Quote: Mordvin 3
            Lyova Zadov, the head of counterintelligence, Old Man Makhno, would have laughed.
            Reply

            And Roshchin at Zadov's interrogation was not laughing...
            1. -1
              6 September 2023 15: 29
              Quote: Sahar Medovich
              And Roshchin at Zadov's interrogation was not laughing...

              There was an article about Zadov. 60% character invented by the writer
    2. +6
      5 July 2023 08: 48
      Good morning .
      I myself am practically from those parts (100 km from Buzuluk), but I have never heard of Sapozhkov.
      Naturally, they didn't teach us this at school.
      The Bolsheviks themselves made many mistakes, and this aroused the discontent of the bulk of the population. The majority then were peasants.
      In those days, the villagers were dissatisfied with both the actions of the Reds and the Whites. Food requisitioning and punitive actions were on both sides.
    3. 0
      6 July 2023 01: 01
      In fact, the surplus appraisal was introduced in 1916 and not at all by the Bolsheviks, which was quite understandable and understandable. In the conditions of a difficult world war, when it was necessary to feed many peasants and workers who had gone to the front, to give food supplies to the army and defense plants to the "free market" - the height of stupidity. And in the civilian one, the collapse of the financial system was added to this, many people printed money, for which little could be bought.
      And for military experts: most of the middle and senior commanders in the Red Army at the beginning of the civil one were former tsarist officers (there were no less of them in the Red Army than in the White Army). Then they were gradually removed, as a rule, to the positions of chiefs of staff. In general, this Sapozhkov was either a "stupid person" or a rogue.
  3. +6
    5 July 2023 05: 23
    Upon learning of his displacement, Sapozhkov first tried to negotiate with the commander of the Zavolzhsky military district, Konstantin Avksentevsky, but in vain. Then he decided to use force.
    laughing Prigozhin, who knew about the disbandment of the PMC since July 1, having failed to agree with the Minister of Defense, decided to act by force. laughing An article with a similar title and text for two years has been circulating on various resources. laughing
    1. +5
      5 July 2023 07: 04
      An article with a similar title and text for two years goes to various resources

      This article is a clumsily rewritten article by Yu. Yu. Anshakov "THE ARMY OF 'PRAVDA' BY THE DEPARTMENT OF SAPOGKOV", from the journal "Proceedings of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 8, No. 3, 2006". Some paragraphs are almost verbatim.
      1. +2
        5 July 2023 07: 47
        Quote Author: Sapozhkov himself, without taking either Novouzensk or Uralsk, retreated with battles to the south, in the steppe of the Astrakhan province. 6 September, in one of the battles, he died, participating in the attack in the forefront of his now small detachment.

        Why September 6th? Where did you get this date from? The documents point to 11/XNUMX.
        On September 12, 1920, Avksentievskiy telegraphed to Trotsky:
        September 11 this year near Lake Bak-Baul Sapozhkov was eliminated. A detachment of Comrade Timashev's Red Army soldiers in the amount of 70 people overtook the Sapozhkovites in the area of ​​​​the village of Koim. During the last attack, Sapozhkov personally led it, being ahead of his detachment. Cadet of the Borisoglebsk cavalry courses comrade. Shevtsov with three other riders rushed to cut him off. Sapozhkov, however, noticed the maneuver and he himself rushed to the pursuers, but was surrounded. The horse under him was killed by a shot, which, falling, crushed the rider. Zemlyansky and his deputy rushed to help Sapozhkov. Budykin. Comrade Shevtsov, seeing that it would not be possible to take Sapozhkov alive, killed him by shooting at point-blank range. The remnants of the rebels, divided into several groups of 10-15 people, scattered in the southern and south-western directions. Persecution organized
        1. +2
          5 July 2023 13: 53
          So what? The Armenians, for example, drove out ..
          Lieutenant Shapovalov and his platoon were shot.
  4. +5
    5 July 2023 05: 25
    There is some kind of trouble with these red divisional commanders and commanders. Whoever did not die in time in battles with the "White Guard hydra" either began to rebel against the Bolsheviks, or in the thirties these Bolsheviks were put up against the wall. laughing
    Chapaev, Parkhomenko and others began to be lucky, but Sapozhkov and Mironov were not very lucky. How many more were there?
    1. +2
      5 July 2023 07: 08
      Sapozhkov himself said on this occasion: "if Chapaev had not been killed, he would, of course, have been shot, just as Budyonny will undoubtedly be shot when they are able to do without him."
      1. +3
        5 July 2023 08: 33
        Quote from Frettaskyrandi
        just as they will undoubtedly shoot Budyonny when they are able to do without him.

        Well, how did it end?
    2. +5
      5 July 2023 07: 08
      Good morning. Konstantin!
      With the hero of the civil war, the commander of the 2nd Cavalry, Philip Kuzmich Mironov, is generally a dark story. He was not convicted and shot, as many write on the Internet, he was allegedly "accidentally" shot by a sentry from a tower while walking around the prison yard. Surprisingly, history has not preserved a single document capable of shedding light on this mysterious murder. Interestingly, Mironov's death came as a complete surprise even to the Chekists themselves: the investigator who fabricated the case of a counter-revolutionary conspiracy found out about the death of an "important witness isolated from communication" a few weeks after the fatal shot. Moreover, Mironov was kept in Butyrka not as an accused, but ..... as an "important witness" in the case of the riot on December 18, 1920 in the village of Mikhailovka, Ust-Medveditsky district, Don region, of the guard regiment, headed by its commander Kirill Timofeevich Vakulin, a communist and holder of the Order of the Red Banner. The reason for the rebellion of the entire military unit was dissatisfaction with the cruelty with which the surplus was carried out in the region, or, in other words, the seizure of food, stocks of wheat and rye prepared for spring sowing from the population. Moreover, the "important witness" Mironov was not in Mikhailovka for a long time - F.I. Mironov had been in Moscow since December 6, where he was summoned to accept the post of chief inspector of the cavalry of the Red Army.
      On whose orders was killed, and then betrayed to complete oblivion, one of the main characters of the Civil War? What is the reason for such a cruel reprisal against a person and his memory? Most likely, in the beginning of the struggle for power, so inevitable after every revolution, honest and incorruptible, straightforward and incapable of compromise, Mironov was dangerous for everyone. And each of those striving for power understood perfectly well that making it an ally in political intrigues would be very problematic. And no one would want to have such an opponent as Philip Kuzmich ...
      There is another legal incident in the amazing fate of this outstanding person: in 1960, by the decision of the Military Collegium of the Supreme Court of the USSR, Philip Kuzmich Mironov was posthumously rehabilitated.
      But how can someone be rehabilitated without this accusing or condemning anything?
      1. +4
        5 July 2023 12: 53
        The content of the famous song by I. Talkov is based on real historical events related to the fate of the former hero of the YaV and WWI, Cossack officer and red commander Philip Mironov (in fact, not a podsaul, but a military foreman), who became one of the first victims of the red terror
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
        2. -1
          5 July 2023 13: 32
          [quote = Richard] The content of the famous song by I. Talkov is based on real historical events related to the fate of the former hero of the nuclear war and WWI, the Cossack officer and red commander Philip Mironov (in fact, not a podsaul, but a military foreman), who became one of the first victims of the red terror
          Well, Talkov is still the one from Bogoroditsk. And wat to spite him!
          1. -1
            5 July 2023 14: 08
            [quote = Mordvin 3] [quote = Richard] The content of the well-known song by I. Talkov is based on real historical events related to the fate of the former hero of the nuclear war and WWI, the Cossack officer and red commander Philip Mironov (in fact, not a podsaul, but a military foreman ), who became one of the first victims of the Red Terror
            Well, Talkov is still the one from Bogoroditsk. But in spite of him!
            [/ Quote]
          2. +1
            5 July 2023 21: 08
            connected with the fate of the former hero of the YaV and WWI Cossack officer and red commander Philip Mironov

            The rebellious Special Don Corps, the future 2nd Cavalry was formed in the future capital of Mordovia, there were more Mordovians than Cossacks.
      2. 0
        7 July 2023 22: 46
        What is the reason for such a cruel reprisal against a person and the memory of him?

        It is logical to assume that he was a witness and executor of those "excesses" that provoked the rebellion of an entire military unit, which was raised by the commander - "a communist and holder of the Order of the Red Banner."
    3. +7
      5 July 2023 07: 33
      Quote: Sea Cat
      There is some kind of trouble with these red divisional commanders and commanders. Whoever did not die in time in battles with the "White Guard hydra" either began to rebel against the Bolsheviks, or in the thirties these Bolsheviks were put up against the wall. laughing
      Chapaev, Parkhomenko and others began to be lucky, but Sapozhkov and Mironov were not very lucky. How many more were there?

      Sapozhkovets wintered twice in our Novouzensky district. Two positions (in the current Aleksandrovo Gaisky district) - one five, the other hexagonal. At the tops - dugouts are quite large, connected by communications.
      The steppe is as flat as a table - therefore, it is impossible to take such fortifications with cavalry with normal defenders and machine guns.
      The Reds fought back in the same way during the defense of Novouzensk - one position along Bolshoy Uzen for shooting those trying to get close along the river bank, the second near the pond.
      The rest of the steppe is shot through until the end of the bullet's flight ...
      The Sapozhkovites were well armed and had a very large supply of ammunition - before the mutiny, they took a few from the rest of the division (Chapaev complained that 4, CHON wrote about 3, the railway refrained from about 5)
      ammo wagons.
      In Novouzensk, we were defending the cartridges brought by rail with armored rubber.
      And this is one of the reasons why Sapozhkov went further down the Volgeskotin - the locals got hooked and the population began to grumble, it was not possible to take Novouzensk without loss.
      And to hold out on some slogans - without lamb - is almost impossible.
      Partners always want to eat ....
    4. +1
      5 July 2023 08: 06
      And also those who themselves put the commanders and commanders against the wall, as well as the Bolsheviks themselves. Not to mention the fact that these commanders were themselves Bolsheviks ...
  5. +11
    5 July 2023 06: 22
    only specialized specialists know about the Sapozhkov uprising, there are few scientific works on the topic, and there are no fiction books or films at all.

    Why not??? Obraz A.V. Sapozhkova goes through the whole trilogy of A. Tolstoy "Walking through the torments" in the background. There is a very colorful character there - a refined intellectual, a staunch anarchist Sergei Sergeevich Sapozhkov. He is a veteran of the First World War, a dashing grunt, paint, he fights for the Bolsheviks and understands them, but at the same time he drinks bitter, because his internal protest against the same Bolsheviks can only be filled with vodka and filled. It was he, the Samara anarchist-modernist Seryozhka Sapozhkov, who in St. Petersburg invited his Samara acquaintance Dasha Bulavina to a meeting of futurists, where she met Ivan Ilyich Telegin. It was he who, in WWI, saved Ensign Telegin from German captivity. It was he who, with paint Sapozhkov, fought in civilian life next to Telegin. It is noteworthy that already in the first Soviet edition of Tolstoy's trilogy, A.V. Sapozhkov becomes Sergei Sergeevich, in contrast to the émigré Berlin edition, where he is Alexander Vasilyevich.
    a photo. G.Burkov as Sapozhkov in the film adaptation of A.Tolstoy's trilogy "Walking Through the Torments". 1977








    True, neither in the famous film nor in the Soviet editions of the novel about the further fate of Sapozhkov is there a word. But in the first Berlin edition, in the penultimate chapter, you can read the following dialogue:
    - Vadim, tell the truth, what do you hear about Sapozhkov? I'm worried about Ivan, they were friends. They say different things, a lot of bad things, but Ivan keeps silent.
    “I don’t know much, Daria Dmitrievna. Raskin at the council informed that he had been expelled from the Samara Revolutionary Committee and from the divisional commanders for anarchist whirlwinds. and he rebelled in response to the troops, put forward the slogan - "Soviets without communists." He had talked a lot of things before drinking, they simply did not pay attention. Get ready for the Bolshoi Theatre, Daria Dmitrievna, maybe something will become clear - there Krzhizhanovsky is making a report on the electrification of Russia. Ivan asked to pick you up. he's waiting for us there. Raskin secretly said that Lenin and Stalin would be there ....

    a photo. trilogy by A. Tolstoy, published in exile in 1922.
    1. 0
      5 July 2023 06: 53
      Fedot is not the same. In "Walking Through the Torments" Sapozhkov was devoted to the cause of the Bolsheviks to the end.
      1. +4
        5 July 2023 08: 42
        Sapozhkov was devoted to the cause of the Bolsheviks to the end.

        Where do you get such a bold and categorical statement? Even Tolstoy himself does not have this - not in any book of the trilogy "Walking Through the Torments" published by Tolstoy, even in exile, even already in the USSR. Neither there nor there - nothing is said - neither about Sapozhkov's devotion to the cause of the Bolsheviks to the end, nor about its very end.
        For your information, for the first time "Walking through the torments" was released by him in 1922 in Berlin in exile, and in the USSR, where he returned from exile in 1928, only in 1941 already significantly edited. During this time, many characters disappeared from the novels. for example, the same commissar Raskin, Krzhizhanovsky, references to Trotsky and many others.
    2. +3
      5 July 2023 08: 59
      not a word about the further fate of Sapozhkov.
      Yes, it is only known that he commanded intelligence in the Budyonny Cavalry, and the novel ends with the presentation of the GOERLO plan.
      1. +1
        5 July 2023 12: 29
        Exactly, dear colleague. Moreover, the cunningly crafted "red count", editing the final version of his trilogy in 1941, acted politically very sensibly - he simply called the final novel of his trilogy "The Eighteenth Year" and limited himself to this time period, removed the "inconvenient" characters who later became enemies of the people.
    3. +3
      5 July 2023 10: 17
      There is a very colorful character there - a refined intellectual, a staunch anarchist Sergei Sergeevich Sapozhkov.
      Sapozhkov, which is discussed in the article, is far from being a refined intellectual. Sergey Sergeevich was looking for the meaning of life, in revolutionary ideas in the construction of a new world. that until Sapozhkov was removed from his post, the surplus appraisal suited him. smile
  6. +1
    5 July 2023 06: 58
    Chapaev himself was formed during the civil war. And it was no coincidence that they gave him Commissar Furmanov. This happened after the massacre of the Cossacks. Who massacred the workers. Even in a dispute with Furmanov, Chapaev recognized only two people. These are Lenin and Frunze. In order for us to judge that time, we must live in this time.
    1. +8
      5 July 2023 08: 00
      Chapaev himself was formed during the civil war.

      What does formed mean? Where was it formed? How was it formed? belay
      And then the old joke comes to mind:
      "Petka
      - Vasil Ivanovich, here Bangladesh was formed!
      Chapaev
      - Do not touch and do not scratch, it will pass by itself, "(c) laughing
      1. 0
        5 July 2023 14: 14
        Yes, there are many jokes about Chapai. "Vasil Ivanovich, look, an iceberg! Row Petka, row ...
  7. +1
    5 July 2023 07: 09
    All this Sapozhkov's uprising, the usual armed adventure, bullshit.
    When Trotsky instructed the stupid Avksentevsky how to crush the rebellion, he spoke sensible words.
  8. -2
    5 July 2023 07: 51
    All power to the Soviets!

    how Chapaev's ally opposed Bolsheviks

    Substitution of concepts. Chapaev was a Bolshevik. Chapaev's supporters opposed the Trotskyists.



    Vasily Ivanovich could not answer directly to the peasant's question: "for the Bolsheviks or for the Communists", behind him stood a Trotskyite. I accuse the Trotskyists of creating such a situation (betrayal) in which Vasily Ivanovich died ... Memory eternal to him.

    The Trotskyists, who staged the genocide of the peoples of Russia then, continue to blame their atrocities on the Bolsheviks. In the same way, they are trying to blame the lawlessness of the 90s on Putin. It will not work!

    That then the peasants had a difference between Bolsheviks and Trotskyists, that today. That is why the Bolshevik Putin always wins with a resounding majority in all presidential elections today.
    1. +4
      5 July 2023 09: 24
      And can I also have such a fenced grass? "Bolshevik Putin with a resounding edge." wassat
      To peasants at all times that they sang from the box, they believe in that. But they think it's their personal opinion))
    2. +3
      5 July 2023 10: 09
      Vasily Ivanovich could not answer, a Trotskyist stood behind him.
      Is Furmanov a Trotskyist? smile Since the spring of 1917, he has been a Socialist-Revolutionary Maximalist, in the autumn of the same year he joined the anarchists, since he considered their program more radical than the Socialist-Revolutionary, and since July 1918 he has been a member of the RCP (b), since July 1918 he has not been seen in any opposition was smile He was going to write a book about Frunze, he made a plan, but he fell ill, neglected himself, and died.
  9. +3
    5 July 2023 08: 15
    In fact, it was thanks to Sapozhkov that the power of the Bolsheviks was established in the district.
    Well, "the role of the individual in history." That is, without this "sufferer for the people" the Bolsheviks would not have won then in the county, he alone did everything.
    1. +3
      5 July 2023 08: 28
      Quote: Aviator_
      "the role of personality in history"

      In troubled times, there are always such individuals - sufferers for the people, for justice, for the Bolsheviks, but with the tsar, or for the Soviets, but without the Bolsheviks.
      In the head of such (they), a complete mess, and given the permissiveness, impunity, free possession of weapons, a bloody and stupid massacre begins.
      Sapozhkov himself, apparently, is a good person, but he beguiled the devil.
    2. +2
      5 July 2023 09: 59
      he alone did everything.
      No matter how yes ... At that time, Sapozhkov, was the only representative of the revolutionary party, its left wing, the Left Socialist-Revolutionary Party, managed to organize the Council, displace local authorities consisting of representatives of right-wing parties and supporting the Provisional Government. Here in our county, at the time of the establishment of Soviet power, there were only five Bolsheviks. And the rest, the Kuban nationalists, are the same Socialist-Revolutionaries, but right-wing Mensheviks. The people followed these Bolsheviks. True, they were Bolsheviks from 1916 and 1917, but nevertheless ...
  10. +6
    5 July 2023 08: 55
    Let's start. Sapozhkov, a member of the Socialist-Revolutionary Party since 1917, but called himself a communist.
    He commanded the 22nd division, on the Southern Front, but did not show himself in any way. In addition, the subordinate division was distinguished by poor discipline. He was removed from his post, sent to the Zavolzhsky district to form the 9th division. , even the head of the Special Department was a Social Revolutionary. Drunkenness, looting, card games flourished in the division, which was encouraged by the command staff. Yes, the division should have been sent after formation to the Polish front. Zavolzhsky District, drunkenness and disorder also flourished, the headquarters was overflowing with military experts of dubious reputation. Avksentievskiy was already drinking then, for which he was later dismissed from the army in 1923. smile ) Sapozhkov, proposed re-election of the Soviets, but with a property qualification that existed in 1914. Sapozhkov's uprising, another knife in the back of the revolution. smile And you can also talk, against the backdrop of all the uprisings of the 1920s, about a large-scale counter-revolutionary SR conspiracy. Let me remind you that this is the most massive party in Russia and in 1918, its number was more than 1 million people
  11. +2
    5 July 2023 15: 08
    Quote: Sugar Honeyovich
    Quote: Mordvin 3
    Lyova Zadov, the head of counterintelligence, Old Man Makhno, would have laughed.
    Reply

    And Roshchin at Zadov's interrogation was not laughing...

    "Hide your teeth...virvu"
  12. +1
    5 July 2023 15: 16
    Quote: kor1vet1974
    not a word about the further fate of Sapozhkov.
    Yes, it is only known that he commanded intelligence in the Budyonny Cavalry, and the novel ends with the presentation of the GOERLO plan.


    Ivan Ilyich came out, and the one who let him out Wild Division officer , said mockingly: - That's the meeting! Ivan Ilyich peered. - I don't know. - Yes Sapozhkov, Sergey Sergeevich. And he burst out laughing hard. - Not expected?

    Far from refined intellectual
    Sapozhkov, which is discussed in the article, is far from a refined intellectual.
  13. +1
    6 July 2023 00: 42
    Moved from place to place many times. Were they given the opportunity to correct their political misconceptions?
    Or was someone in the political justice system of the opinion that Sapozhkov was not an enemy, but a strong comrade?
    How would the history of our country develop if they raked out from the moneybags, both urban and rural, not clean, but leaving at least three hundred grams of grain for each mouth for a day for sowing and for eating. Both human and animal. Maybe less well-fed people would die, and not more hungry people would die.
    1. -1
      6 July 2023 08: 03
      Quote from Fangaro
      How would the history of our country develop if they raked out from the moneybags, both urban and rural, not clean, but leaving at least three hundred grams of grain for each mouth for a day for sowing and for eating. Both human and animal. Maybe less well-fed people would die, and not more hungry people would die.

      Unfortunately, this is not possible for 2 reasons.
      1) the human factor - "He tormented us and we pity him?!!!!"
      2) it most manifested itself at the time of the NEP - babblers with BUBBLE instantly formed, who bought all the power in the bud. No one could resist them - there was no fine, there the Revolutionary Tribunal loomed ...
      And this is one of the reasons for the shooting of those who were in power in 1924 - in "1937"
  14. 0
    14 October 2023 08: 29
    But Sapozhkov had every chance to turn a blind eye to, to put it mildly, the excesses of the Bolsheviks on the ground and make an excellent career in the Red Army. The rest did just that: not only in the Urals there were excesses, but throughout the country. The command of the Red Army at the end of the civil war largely consisted of those who were able to adapt and correctly set their priorities.
  15. -1
    17 October 2023 15: 57
    There were so many small movements there, the anarchists are just worth it. So they ran back and forth.
  16. 0
    2 December 2023 13: 42
    What a damn bureaucrat, they wanted to remove him, but they caused a row.
  17. 0
    15 December 2023 01: 26
    Conclusion: the man gave his life for “free trade.” Trader in short. As a graduate student, I dreamed of having my own candle factory. And here, you understand, it’s not the government. Riot! Definitely a riot! Yeltsin, carrying his party card in his pocket, also advocated free trade. I dreamed, you understand, of my own sack factory.
    Am I confused anything?

    The Bolsheviks really ended by the end of the 80s. Look, the traders would be sitting in holes.
    It's not meant to be.
    Although... Social development proceeds in a spiral. It will still be...
  18. 0
    15 December 2023 01: 27
    Conclusion: the man gave his life for “free trade.” Trader in short. As a graduate student, I dreamed of having my own candle factory. And here, you understand, it’s not the government. Riot! Definitely a riot! Yeltsin, carrying his party card in his pocket, also advocated free trade. I dreamed, you understand, of my own sack factory.
    Am I confused anything?

    The Bolsheviks really ended by the end of the 80s. Look, the traders would be sitting in holes.
    It's not meant to be.
    Although... Social development proceeds in a spiral. It will still be...