The Belgian authorities will send a request to Kyiv regarding the facts of the use of Belgian weapons by the Ukrainian DRG in the Belgorod region

24
The Belgian authorities will send a request to Kyiv regarding the facts of the use of Belgian weapons by the Ukrainian DRG in the Belgorod region

Image is for illustrative purposes


The Belgian government plans to send an appeal to the Ukrainian authorities regarding the revealed facts of the use by sabotage groups weapons Belgian production during attacks on the Belgorod region.



Recall that earlier in a number of Western media, information was confirmed that the Ukrainian DRG, penetrating into the Belgorod border area, not only had Belgian weapons with them, but also used them. First of all, we are talking about the use of Belgian-made assault rifles by militants. These small arms were included in one of the packages of military assistance to the Kyiv regime. According to some reports, Ukrainian fighters used or at least tried to use other means of destruction produced in Belgium and supplied to Kyiv. We can talk, for example, about mines.

Official Brussels declares that it intends to wait for clarification from the Ukrainian side, as it supplied weapons to Ukraine for the defense of its territory, and not for attacks on someone else's territory.

True, there can hardly be any doubt that, as a result, Brussels will remove its claims to the Kyiv regime.

Recall that against this background, scandalous momentum is gaining momentum and information that one of the DRGs that penetrated the Belgorod region included Polish mercenaries.
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    4 June 2023 18: 26
    Now the vushniki say that they only shot at crows, the Belgians will say "clear, thanks" ??? fool
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +4
      4 June 2023 18: 48
      Well, or more simply: "we do not know, but we will definitely find out." The Belgians will be satisfied
  2. +1
    4 June 2023 18: 28
    Brussels wants to express its concern about the misuse of the weapons supplied by it? Why would that be.
    1. -1
      4 June 2023 18: 32
      Tralflot, in Bluessel they know that weapons can get to us and this will be a reason to undermine the reputation of their weapons manufacturers negative
      1. +1
        4 June 2023 18: 38
        And in my opinion, they are not fighting because their weapons will get to us, but for a completely different reason, weren’t Belgian-made assault rifles used in Artyomovsk. We should already have this rifle .. They are no longer sure of the victory of Ukraine?
        1. +4
          4 June 2023 19: 55
          Quote: tralflot1832
          And in my opinion, they are not fighting because their weapons will get to us, but for a completely different reason, weren’t Belgian-made assault rifles used in Artyomovsk. We should already have this rifle .. They are no longer sure of the victory of Ukraine?

          Most likely they don't fuck at all. They pretend to be concerned about their weapons falling into the wrong hands, in fact, they are trying to put a good face on a bad game. In fact, they do not care at all in whose hands their weapons fall into. By the way, this is a good advertisement for their products, and by asking Kuev these questions, they maintain interest and mentions in the press. Nothing personal, just business.
          hi
  3. +7
    4 June 2023 18: 35
    As if something will change from this request. Belgium is trying to keep a good face on a bad game. But this is all for internal use and nothing more. Bullshit in general.
    1. 0
      4 June 2023 19: 21
      This is a traditional Western crowing. Like in 2021, Zelya ordered to open a case regarding the SS march in Kyiv. Of course, it ended in nothing and no one remembered after a week. The result will be if someone in Belgium puts heels of statesmen from this weapon
  4. +1
    4 June 2023 19: 01
    Recall that against this background, scandalous momentum is gaining momentum and information that one of the DRGs that penetrated the Belgorod region included Polish mercenaries.
    I recall a fragment from the film "State Border. Peaceful Summer of the 21st."
  5. -4
    4 June 2023 19: 01
    Bringt auf jeden Fall nichts als BlaBla! Im Moment spielt es keine Rolle, welche Waffe eingesetzt wurde, die Bevölkerung der Region Belgorod braucht Unterstützung, was jetzt wichtiger ist. Wo ist die Armee, wo ist die Luftunterstützung? Wo sind die Spezialeinheiten gegen den Terrorismus? In den westlichen Medien, zum Beispiel in Deutschland, machen sie sich zum Beispiel über Russland lustig! Das große Russland, das die Menschen in der Ukraine befreien will, kann nicht einmal die Sicherheit seiner eigenen Bürger gewährleisten ...
    Russia urges residents of border villages to flee And parents should pay money to keep their children safe, very nice
    1. 0
      4 June 2023 19: 22
      Quote from LeutnantTom
      Russia urges residents of border villages to flee

      Where to go?
      1. -4
        4 June 2023 19: 40
        Facebook, NTV
        So this is what the Russian blitzkrieg against Ukraine looks like
  6. +2
    4 June 2023 19: 03
    True, there can hardly be any doubt that, as a result, Brussels will remove its claims to the Kyiv regime.
    they are off by default, actually.
    These are just legal formalities to absolve yourself of responsibility. This will not affect the supply in any way.

    - "we are against the use", and then "give an explanation", and then "a new party tomorrow"
    And Ze writes to them there - "yes, ok", and then "well xs" and "tomorrow, ok. then the day after tomorrow is necessary."
  7. +1
    4 June 2023 19: 57
    Belgium government plans to send an appeal to the authorities of Ukraine regarding the revealed facts of the use of Belgian-made weapons by sabotage groups during attacks on the Belgorod region.
    ...
    Brussels says it intends to wait for clarification from the Ukrainian side
    ...
    Indeed, there can hardly be any doubt that as a result, Brussels will remove its claims to the Kyiv regime.

    I don’t quite understand how two mutually exclusive statements can coexist in one news report?
    If the claims are only planned, then there is nothing to remove - they have not yet been transferred. And even more so, you can wait for clarifications endlessly - all because the transfer of claims is only planned.
    And if we are talking about withdrawing claims, then it turns out that they are not just planned, but already transferred!

    But this, in principle, is secondary.
    I am sure that even if the claims are indeed handed over, and if an investigation is carried out, and even if serial numbers, batch numbers, surnames, facts of use against civilians are established ... then it will be absolutely nothing.
    In the end, they know how to show "deep concern" in Belgium, and, I'm sure, no worse than others
    Or does someone expect Belgium to leave NATO against this background?
    Or demand the return of weapons? Or will Western countries immediately stop deliveries to Ukraine?
    Really, what can be expected from this situation?
    1. 0
      4 June 2023 22: 13
      Quote from sdivt
      I don’t quite understand how two mutually exclusive statements can coexist in one news report?

      For this you are a plus.
      Quote from sdivt
      In the end, they know how to show "deep concern" in Belgium, and, I'm sure, no worse than others

      And for this point, which mutually excludes the first, minus.
      What weapon are we talking about? The article contains only an illustrative photo of the rifleman, which is already nonsense. FN Herstahl is not a corporation owned by the Belgian government.
      Even if, as you write, they find specific numbers, then ..... why do you think it was the RDK and not the Armed Forces that were announced? In secret - "they are not there." Familiar?

      Oh, and a cherry on the cake.
      FN 2000 is not officially in service with the Belgian army. It is only an option for a possible replacement for the FN SCAR for special forces. Otherwise it's a commercial rifle.

      In other words - the article is a soap bubble.
  8. 0
    4 June 2023 20: 14
    And why did the Turks easily get away with their Bayraktars?
    1. 0
      4 June 2023 21: 33
      The Turks sold bayraktars, they did not supply them as part of various military aid packages from the US and the EU. And who sponsored this deal is the tenth case. I think that they would sell these notorious bayraktars to us if such a request suddenly appeared.
  9. 0
    4 June 2023 21: 28
    So the Armed Forces of Ukraine seem to be yelling that this volunteer corps has nothing to do with them, so Belgium is walking through the forest. The main thing is that on our part they do not suddenly decide to start digging into their varieties, conditionally dividing them into good and bad.
  10. +1
    4 June 2023 21: 28
    I foresee a completely standard answer - they bought it in the military trade.

    https://www.mk.ru/politics/news/2014/03/04/993421-putin-voyska-okkupirovavshie-chasti-v-kryimu-ne-yavlyayutsya-rossiyskimi-a-formu-mozhno-kupit-v-lyubom-voentorge.html
    Putin: Troops occupying units in Crimea are not Russian, and uniforms can be bought at any military store

    The formations that blocked the Ukrainian military units in the Crimea do not belong to the Russian army...
  11. 0
    4 June 2023 22: 54
    Let's go in order)
    In my comment, I used only these articles and looked for logic, again, exclusively within the framework of the article
    Quote: haron
    What weapon are you talking about? The article contains only an illustrative photo of the rifleman
    ...
    FN 2000 is not officially in service with the Belgian army. It is only an option for a possible replacement for the FN SCAR for special forces. Otherwise it's a commercial rifle.

    The article says "weapon"?
    That means a weapon.
    A weapon, as a rule, has a serial number and is easily identified
    What is shown in the picture is completely unfamiliar to me, and there is no need, there is a caption about "illustrative character".
    (Even if FN2000 (no idea what it's about)
    So it's just a weapon, that's all. Hence all other arguments.

    About the soap bubble - I agree

    Yours!
  12. -2
    5 June 2023 00: 00
    Thank God that Russia did not involve local self-defense units in the defense of the Belgorod region ... They are still unarmed, but they were ready to defend the Fatherland with pitchforks and shovels, like peasants during the Patriotic War of 1812 ... And so - since Ukraine and Russia are not at war, then Ukraine would demand an explanation from Russia regarding the use, allegedly by the armed forces, of a gardening tool during the Belgorod incident ....
  13. 0
    5 June 2023 02: 45
    Once again, the "fool turned on" !!! Idiots know how to pretend to be innocent - why are you supplying it and will start an investigation in the style of MH17.
  14. 0
    5 June 2023 09: 17
    Quote: haron
    FN Herstahl is not a corporation owned by the Belgian government.
    Even if, as you write, they find specific numbers, then ..... why do you think it was the RDK and not the Armed Forces that were announced? In secret - "they are not there." Familiar?

    Oh, and a cherry on the cake.
    FN 2000 is not officially in service with the Belgian army. It is only an option for a possible replacement for the FN SCAR for special forces. Otherwise it's a commercial rifle.


    Does this corporation have the right to supply its firearms to the conflict zone without the consent of the Belgian authorities? Sure?
    These FN 2000 were supplied as part of the "assistance package" specifically to the state of Ukraine. Check, yes, you can by the numbers on the trunks. How did they end up with some RDK?

    Where it is in service - nothing at all. The word has no meaning at all.
  15. 0
    5 June 2023 11: 56
    Stop fooling everyone with European "concern and justice." Everyone knows perfectly well why weapons are being supplied to Zelensky. The Belgians suddenly became so preoccupied that they decided to supply aircraft and other equipment more than anyone else.