Weak field fortifications of the Russian army - one of the problems of the Russo-Japanese war of 1904-1905

4
Weak field fortifications of the Russian army - one of the problems of the Russo-Japanese war of 1904-1905

As you know, any war is not only about attack, but also about defense. No wonder they say that in addition to possession weapons, the fighter must be "friends" with a shovel.

Quickly digging in on occupied lines or holding back an enemy advance in pre-prepared positions is an important part of any military confrontation.



It was with this that the problem of the Russian army during the Russo-Japanese war of 1904-1905 was connected. At the same time, there are two main reasons why our field fortifications did not differ in efficiency.

The first, and the main one, was underfunding. If in those years in Europe concrete was already widely used for the construction of fortifications, then in the Russian Empire there was a directive to "save".

As a result, field fortifications, including long-term ones, were built mostly from earth and wood.

For example, consider the defensive line near Liaoyang.

It would seem that the three-meter parapets gave an advantage to the Russian shooters. However, in the end, the latter had to be "removed" from the embankments, since they mostly did not have protective canopies and were easily shot through by enemy artillery.

However, even where these sheds were, they were built of logs and earth, which protected the fighters from three-inch artillery, but was absolutely useless when attacking Japanese 150-mm field guns.

The second reason was "sluggishness". So, Russian field fortifications, even taking into account the fact that the local Chinese population was involved in their construction, were built for a very long time.

For example, according to historical according to information, an earthen redoubt for two companies was built by a group of 400 people on average in two weeks. That is, it was simply impossible to prepare a new position in a short time by quickly retreating.

Moreover, even these redoubts were erected with gross violations. For the most part, the trenches of the full profile remained unfinished, and the defense of the trenches of the knee profile turned out to be heavy losses for the Russian army.

4 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    18 May 2023 04: 00
    The forts and caponiers of the Vladivostok fortress are still standing. Made very conscientiously, the concrete is very good
    1. +1
      18 May 2023 15: 00
      The forts and caponiers of the Vladivostok fortress are still standing. Made very conscientiously, the concrete is very good

      Yes, but that's not it. This is a hospital. And in the field?
      The approach had to be changed. If you fight like that, then of course ...
      For example, according to historical references, an earthen redoubt for two companies was built by a group of 400 people on average in two weeks. That is, it was simply impossible to prepare a new position in a short time by quickly retreating.


      The company itself must bury itself in the ground up to its ears in 3 days.
  2. +1
    18 May 2023 14: 52
    Looked. Unexpectedly interesting. It seems that the matter is not in concrete, in the Second World War there was also a little of it.
    The point is in the approach itself, you need to quickly bury ALL troops, and not build complex and ineffective redoubts. But this idea still needed to grow ...
    1. 0
      18 May 2023 19: 05
      Quote: Arzt
      The point is the approach itself, you need to quickly bury EVERYTHING


      It was assumed that the T-34 would be the carrier of the Kravtsev trencher.
      https://yuripasholok.livejournal.com/13188180.html

      At that time, already forgotten, unpretentious and simple locomobiles could be a suitable base for a trencher; maybe even armored.