The Beginning of the Industrial Revolution: the Eve of the Napoleonic Wars

64
The Beginning of the Industrial Revolution: the Eve of the Napoleonic Wars
"The Foundry" by John Ferguson Weir (1866)


How did this topic come about?


Some time ago, I was interested in the technology of casting sculptures in the 1794th century. There are enough materials on castings of bronze sculptures, but they often refer to the casting of gun barrels. There is more information on the 9th century here, but one work is the most complete - Description de l'art de fabriquer des canons, published in 1746, by Gaspard Monge, Comte de Peluz (May 28, 1818 - July 1804 XNUMX), French mathematician, inventor of descriptive geometry, technical drawing, and father of differential geometry. During the French Revolution, he served as Minister of the Navy and participated in the reform of the French education system, helping to found the Polytechnic School. This book was translated and published in Russia in XNUMX.



The end of the XNUMXth century is the time when France and Britain (as well as many others) will converge in a series of conflicts on land and at sea. And what did the industry that provided the material basis for these wars look like? Hence the interest was born - to look at the level of technology in France and Britain of this period. And then to get acquainted in more detail with the content of the treatise of Mr. Monge, which absorbed the knowledge of metallurgy, metalworking, mechanical engineering.

An idea of ​​the level of industry, crafts, science in France is given by the Encyclopedia, or Explanatory Dictionary of Sciences, Arts and Crafts (Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers) - an outstanding work of the Enlightenment and one of the main reference publications of the XVIII century, covering all areas of knowledge.

The main 28 volumes of the Encyclopedia, including 11 volumes of illustrations, were published over a period of 21 years (1751–1772) on the initiative of Denis Diderot and the mathematician Jean d'Alembert. They contain 71 articles and 818 engravings. Among those who collaborated with the Encyclopedia in different years were such prominent figures of the Enlightenment as Voltaire, Montesquieu, Holbach, Helvetius, Rousseau, Buffon, Condorcet and others. The authors and compilers of the Encyclopedia are called encyclopedists.


Title page of the first volume.

The engraving metaphorically represents both the subject matter and the natural science orientation of the publication. Against the background of the columns stands a figure personifying the Truth, the light emanating from it scatters the clouds. Reason and Philosophy, located on the right, lift and tear off the veil from Truth, Theology is kneeling at its feet. Behind Mind are Memory, Modern story and Ancient history (apparently, somewhere nearby is a place for us, lovers of history), time serves as a support for writing history. Below are Geometry, Astronomy and Physics, below them are Optics, Botany, Chemistry and Agronomy. The figures below represent several arts and professions originating in the sciences. This relationship of allegorical figures provides material for understanding the philosophy of the Enlightenment. Symbols and meanings deeply permeate every time.

Many articles and illustrations make it possible to assess the level of development of technology and crafts. Art, medicine, astronomy, agriculture are also in the descriptions, but at the moment we are interested in machines. Below are engravings, which can be used to imagine what technical devices were present in the industry.



Cloth production equipment


rope factory


blacksmith shop


Frame structures in bridges and ceilings


Making nails. Note the great variety of this simple product. This indicates the development and specialization of fastener technologies.


Cannon barrel drilling


Aiming the gun


For lovers of martial arts, a few fencing techniques

Why, out of thousands of drawings, were these chosen?

Firstly, in them you can see and evaluate the level of technology. At the same time, in various industries, the driving force of the equipment was a water wheel or muscle power. The drive was carried out from one shaft and was distributed to separate mechanisms. Thus, the production was already structurally and technologically ready for the use of a steam engine. If we look forward from the XNUMXth century, into the future, we will see that this approach will continue until the beginning of the XNUMXth century.

Throughout the XNUMXth century, a shaft with pulleys and a belt drive to each machine stretched under the ceiling of the production room. The enterprise was served by one, later several steam engines. Only the transition to electricity, reducing the cost of producing electric motors, reducing their size and increasing reliability made it possible to equip each machine with its own drive.

Secondly, we will later try to compare these drawings with the drawings of machine tools for the manufacture of gun barrels in the book "Description of the Art of Making Cannons." I would like to understand whether Russia received modern technologies at that time, or something approximate and outdated. Let's try not to forget it.

Light industry was one of the main driving forces of the industrial revolution. It all started with her. The formation of a colonial system with a division into raw materials territories (colonies) and industrial high-tech centers (metropolises) made it possible, on the basis of price dictates, to create a high level of income for the metropolis, ensuring a steady solvent demand for new fabrics.

At this time, the transition from woolen fabrics to cotton fabrics accelerated. The multiple growth in textile consumption forced the modernization of the machine park, this prompted the development of the production of capital goods, metallurgy, transport, extractive industries, etc. And, of course, such revolutionary changes in the structure of industry as a whole led to a huge energy shortage. The economy as a whole categorically lacked the available power of wind, water, animals and people. Everyone needed a source of mechanical energy independent of place and time, the market was already ready to accept the steam engine.

Consider a few examples of new machines, mechanisms, technologies that were created at that time. Their distant descendants are used by us now. Of course, not a complete and comprehensive list, but examples that have some features that characterize the era.

Let's start with the textile industry.

Textile industry


Fundamentally, the technological process for the production of textile products has been preserved to this day. Fiber preparation, yarn spinning, fabric making. At each of these stages, new equipment came that qualitatively changed not only production, but also social conditions.

Comment. In some cases, the literature indicates the figures for increasing the productivity of a new machine, but it is not clear from the text how the calculations were made, and whether they refer to one worker: to an installation, to an enterprise that has switched to a new technological process.


Eli Whitney cotton gin. Fragment A shows the main components of the device that determine its effectiveness

In the 1793th century, the cultivation of cotton and the sale of cotton fiber in the southern states of North America was not a highly profitable industry. The cultivated varieties of short-staple cotton were distinguished by high stickiness of seeds, which led to a laborious process of cleaning the fiber from them. In 8, Eli Whitney Jr. (December 1765, 8 – January 1825, XNUMX), an American inventor then working as an assistant cotton plantation manager in Georgia, invented the cotton gin.

This mechanism made it possible to separate the fiber from debris, dry leaves and seeds, pre-comb the fibers and form a fiber ribbon of a given width at the output. Essentially, a cotton strip. The main elements were two drums rotating at different speeds. A relatively slow, short-toothed drum tore out individual small pieces of fiber from the loaded mass of raw cotton, the second drum, rotating faster, was equipped with long rows of soft bristles, brushes of a kind.

These bristles tore out individual fibers from cotton tufts stuck on the hooks of the first drum, while not capturing debris and seeds. Seeds fell into a special bunker, and oil was made from them. From the bristles of the second drum, the fibers were captured by the next drum and fed into the accumulator, at the exit of which an endless tape of cotton wool was formed.


Here is a general view. Everything is here - cotton, slaves, planters

The productivity of the cleaning process has increased many times - from 4 to 8 times. The quality of products has become higher and more stable. The profitability of growing cotton increased, plantations began to expand, but this required new workers - slaves. Although Whitney himself believed that his invention would reduce the demand for slave labor and help accelerate the elimination of slavery, his machine turned short-staple cotton into a profitable crop and strengthened the economic basis of slavery.

To give an idea of ​​the changed situation, the following figures can be cited: the volume of raw cotton produced in the United States increased in 1790-1810. from 1,5 to 85 million pounds per year.

In addition, Whitney took up the production of muskets, which were assembled from standard, interchangeable parts. Having received an order from the US government, Whitney set up production weaponsconsisting of standard parts. It was a revolutionary step in the production of weapons and in engineering in general.

The next important step was the invention of productive spinning machines. First, the so-called roving was formed from cotton fiber - not twisted strands of fiber, thread blanks. At the next stage, the roving was twisted, forming a thread with the specified parameters. The most important machine for this second stage of production is the "Jenny's spinning wheel".

The mechanical spinning machine designed by James Hargreaves (c. 1720 - April 22, 1778) in 1764 was called Spinning Jenny. Hargreaves himself was an English weaver, carpenter and inventor who lived and worked in Lancashire, England. It is believed that the appearance of this machine in 1764 was the beginning of the "Industrial Revolution" and marked the process of a global transition from manual to machine labor.


Vintage drawing of "Jenny's spinning wheel"

Eight skeins with a roving and eight spindles for the final product were installed in the "Jenny's spinning wheel" (their number was later increased). Coils with roving, thread prepared for spinning, were placed on a special inclined frame. The slope of this frame ensured the ease of winding the roving. The threads of the roving passed from the skeins through a drawing press of two wooden plates, after which they were wound on spindles.

The spindles on which the finished thread was wound were located on the opposite side of the loom. At the bottom of each spindle there was a pulley, around which there was a belt that provided communication with the manual drive of the machine. When winding the roving on a spindle, it was additionally twisted. The spinning worker had to move the draw press carriage and turn the drive wheel, which made the spindles move.

It should be noted that the first designs of this spinning machine were somewhat inferior to hand-made threads in quality, due to the loose twisting of the thread. In order to make the yarn more durable, linen thread had to be added to it.


Scheme of operation of the "Jenny's spinning wheel" 1 - exhaust press, 2 - roving, 3 - spindle holder, 4 - skeins with roving, 5 - drive, 6 - belt drive; 7, 8, 9 - spindle drive, 10 - thread, 12 - spindle with thread

However, the Jenny spinning wheel also had undeniable advantages.

It was driven by one worker and produced more than six times more yarn than an ordinary spinning wheel could produce in the same time. Thus, many artisans lost their jobs. Although Hargreaves did not manage to sell many copies of his machine, his invention caused strong discontent among local spinners - in 1768 they destroyed the inventor's house and workshop. Hargreaves moved to Nottingham and built a spinning mill with Thomas James, becoming one of the first major manufacturers.

Note: It is commonly reported in the literature that Jenny is the name of the inventor's daughter. However, other researchers say that neither Hargreaves' wife nor any of his daughters went by the name Jenny, contrary to the myth repeated until now. According to them, the word "Jenny" refers to the hand drive used, it was a common slang term in Lancashire in the XNUMXth century, which is sometimes found even now.


Diagram of a hand loom. 1 - drum with warp, 2 - warp threads, 3 - shaft holders, 4 - botanical, 5 - shed, 7 - shaft pedals, 8 - warp tensioner, 9 - shafts

Another contender for the invention that opened the industrial revolution is the flying shuttle. Its inventor John Kay was born in 1704 in Bury, Lancashire. By profession a clothier. In 1730 he moved to Colchester. There he made parts for looms. In 1733, he patented the flying shuttle, which significantly speeded up the manual process of making fabric and cut the labor force in half. If earlier the loom required one weaver on each side, now one operator could work.

In a typical frame loom, which was used before the invention of the flying shuttle, the worker sat in front of the fabric and used pedals or some other mechanism to raise and lower the shafts (shaddle - part of the loom, consisting of two bars, between which are installed warp thread holders ( The shafts, moving up or down, raise or lower the warp threads, forming a shed (a gap between the upper and lower warp threads).

Transverse threads are laid in the throat - ducks. Then the operator had to stretch his hand forward, holding the shuttle with the spool of weft thread, and pass it through the shed. After that, the shuttle had to be captured with the other hand, the pharynx closed, and the botan (the part is designed to seal (nail) the laid weft threads) stretched forward to push the ducks into place. All this required constant leaning forward along the fabric. In addition, passing the shuttle through the shed required several workers if the width of the fabric exceeded 50–60 inches.


Flying shuttle loom

The flying shuttle loom uses a horizontal guide bar on which the lower warp threads rest. The shuttle slides along these threads, resting on the bar and moving through the shed. At each end of the rail there is a mechanism that grabs the shuttle at the end of its journey and gives the shuttle momentum to move in the opposite direction. Simply put, a brake to stop and a pusher to reverse. The ends of the shuttle are bullet-shaped and have a metal cap, and the shuttle body has rollers to reduce friction. The pushers were driven by a sharp blow of the drive handle.

Thus, after each change in the position of the warp threads, the shuttle “flighted” across the fabric. The movement of the shuttle became so fast that it was difficult to keep track of it. Therefore, the name is “flying”.

This invention made it possible to abandon several workers on one machine, increase the width of the web, and speed up work. Data on productivity growth in different sources vary - from 4 to 8 times. In addition, it became possible to lead the process to one mechanical drive, which was done somewhat later. In 1747, John Kay traveled to Paris and for a year negotiated with the French government to sell them his technology. The huge lump sum requested could not be obtained, and Cay eventually agreed to 3 livres plus a pension of 000 livres (annually from 2) in exchange for his patent and instructions for using it.

In the process of further development of these machines, an important role was played by the Englishman Edmund Cartwright. In 1785 he created the first, and in 1792 the second design of the loom. The whole process of weaving was mechanized: hooking the shuttle, raising the shaft, breaking the weft thread with a reed, unwinding the spare warp threads and winding the finished fabric. These machines could be powered by a steam engine, which in turn increased productivity again.

It is impossible to ignore another loom - a loom for making patterned fabrics (known as a jacquard loom). It is an example of a computer controlled machine. Its inventor, Joseph Marie Jacquard (sometimes Jacquard; French Joseph Marie Jacquard; July 7, 1752 - August 7, 1834) was a French merchant and weaver. Cardboard punched card carried information about the upper or lower position of each main thread (whether or not there is a hole in the corresponding position on the punched card). As a result, a two-sided ornament is formed on the fabric, where one side is a color or texture negative of the other.


Loom for patterned fabrics (Jacquard loom)

Punched cards could control up to 100 threads. They were sewn into one working tape and changed as needed by the machine operator. The warp threads are stretched in the lower part of the device in a horizontal direction. To obtain a patterned fabric, it is sufficient to omit not all the even or all odd warp threads alternately in order to pass the hook with the weft thread into the shed, but only omit some of them.

A certain order of these threads, calculated for each shuttle pass, implements a given pattern. Any warp thread passes in the weaving mill through a special thread ring connected to a vertical holder. If there was a hole in the punched card, the holder corresponding to this position was raised, which means that the warp thread was also raised, in the absence of a hole, the thread remained at the bottom. A special mechanism moves the punched card strip automatically after each shuttle pass.

The fate of the inventor and his relationship with the state is interesting. Jacquard worked on the machine tool in Paris at the Conservatory of Arts and Crafts*. Here, in 1804, he created his loom, which weaved patterned silk. On April 15, 1805, Emperor Napoleon granted the city of Lyon a patent for a jacquard loom. In return, Jacquard was rewarded with a pension of three thousand francs and a fee of fifty francs for each loom that was bought and used between 1805 and 1811. By 1812 there were 11 jacquard looms in operation in France. In 000, the inventor was awarded the Cross of the Legion of Honor.

*The "Conservatory of Arts and Crafts" was established on October 10, 1794, on the initiative of Abbé Henri Grégoire in Paris, who proposed to the National Convention a project to create an institution whose purpose would be "to improve the national industry, study and preserve machines and tools, drawings and models, books and various documentation of all existing arts and crafts. The private collections confiscated during the French Revolution were transferred to the jurisdiction of the new institution. To date, the museum keeps one of the most outstanding technical collections in Europe.

Conclusions


Machines and mechanisms, their structure and principles of operation attract the attention of the reader, but the analysis of their overall impact on industry, the economy, and society as a whole is also very important. Let's try to note some of them, dividing conditionally into several groups for convenience of consideration. Although, of course, all these phenomena are inextricably linked with each other.

social impact


New technologies required new workers. The transition from the skill of a craftsman to the skills of a machine park operator and equipment adjuster. This led to social tension.

All the mentioned inventors suffered from the Luddites (protests of the old technological order against the new market demands).

The cotton purifier gave slavery a "second wind" altogether.

New ratios of prices for products and wages of workers. Those who have a job began to live better.

Technique


The need to update the machine park of light industry gave impetus to the development of mechanical engineering, metallurgy, mining, transport, the construction of steam engines, etc.

Not automation yet, but mechanization of processes.

Moving away from the use of human power and water to steam energy.

Economy


Explosive growth in the volume of production, first in light industry, and then in heavy industry.

The state financially (grants) and institutionally (by creating organizations and departments) supported the development of modern technologies and technical inventions.

The birth of a new world - the economy. Division of labor, unification of markets, price management. The division into a metropolis with leading technologies, non-sovereign vassal states with mid-level technologies (markets and products of an incomplete production cycle) and disenfranchised colonies as sources of raw materials. Economic management through the dictates of prices, due to which the metropolis becomes the center of profit.

The economy and production are becoming powerful enough to clothe and shoe hundreds of thousands of soldiers, arm them, provide them with gunpowder and cannonballs, sails and ropes. In the end, bring everyone and everything to the battlefield. At the same time, we must try not to go bankrupt during the first months of the war. Everything is ready for the era of the Napoleonic Wars.

State and politics


Patent law has been developed, records of equipment manufactured under a patent have been established and payments are made for this.

Inventors move from country to country with key technologies, despite the intense political rivalry between France and Britain.

Formation of new decisions in relations with colonies and vassal countries. For example, the requirements for increasing the output of cotton fiber were decided as follows. Light industry products (including fabrics) were sent to Africa, where they were exchanged for slaves, they were taken to America, where they were exchanged (bought / sold) for cotton.

At the same time, the southern states received expensive technological goods from Britain. From Africa (the colonies in general) came raw materials in exchange for consumer goods. Not a single voyage of merchant ships was empty.

Trade wars with customs barriers. Competition of economic systems. Wars are approaching, if not engines, then artillery, armor and logistics.

Conclusion


There is a surprising amount of significant information about the development of technology in the period 1750-1800. The rapid growth of industry is closely connected with politics, finance, and economics. After looking at just a few devices, they saw the birth of that same industrial revolution.

Unfortunately, in the first part, it was not possible to come close to discussing Monge's work on the manufacture of cannons. But let's leave that for the next part.

Industrial production is related processes in various industries. Some solutions were used both in the manufacture of tools and in the manufacture of steam engines. It would probably not be very correct to tear one technical process out of the general technological context.
64 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    April 29 2023 05: 29
    his invention caused strong dissatisfaction with local spinners - in 1768 they destroyed the inventor's house and his workshop

    With such a frantic development of Artificial Intelligence, humanity is also waiting for something similar in the near future ... I read the article with interest, respect to the author!
    1. +2
      April 29 2023 06: 35
      Quote: Luminman
      With such a frenzied development of Artificial Intelligence

      I did not notice artificial intelligence in nature. So far - another fake
      1. +2
        April 29 2023 06: 46
        Quote from Bingo
        I did not notice artificial intelligence in nature

        You are probably looking in the wrong place...
        1. +3
          April 29 2023 07: 57
          The simplest example is that when the same task is given multiple times using different formulations, artificial "intelligence" will have divergence of results. Discrepancy, different answers to the same question, asked in different ways. This comes from the very principle of supposedly "intelligence" and its "self-learning", based on the enumeration of patterns and the issuance of the most frequent and most suitable.
          Accordingly, nothing similar to intelligence was lying around here, and this is a fundamental, inherent in the very essence of this, which is called AI, crap.
          1. -1
            April 29 2023 08: 44
            Quote from Bingo
            "intelligence" and its "self-learning" based on enumeration of patterns

            When you solve a problem, don't you sort through the patterns in your head to give the final result?

            Quote from Bingo
            what is called AI, crap

            what you call crap are computed tomography, search engines and face recognition systems. That's right, the first thing that came to mind...
            1. +2
              April 29 2023 09: 08
              Quote: Luminman
              When you solve a problem, don't you sort through the patterns in your head to give the final result?

              laughing
              This is epic! Thank God not, if I were a machine intelligence, I would talk about examples that cannot be solved by selecting templates, for example, the slogan of the First Honey - "Treat not the disease, but the patient." But I'm not AI, so I'll answer easier - I first understand the task, and the intellect immediately looks for correspondences according to some analogues of the conditions.
              Quote: Luminman
              What you call crap is a CT scan
              Related to the intellect as a spectacle snake to a widespread optical device - no fool will trust her to make a diagnosis. About the search engine and face recognition is not there at all - can you imagine the difference between a library and a library catalog? Where is the intelligence? The dumbest search, mechanical. More precisely, "in electronic form", in principle - the same thing
              1. -2
                April 29 2023 09: 32
                Quote from Bingo
                Where is the intelligence?

                To close this topic, let me remind you of a program that can play chess. And play well, beating grandmasters easily. There are no templates - pure intellect...
                1. +12
                  April 29 2023 10: 03
                  Quote: Luminman
                  There are no templates - pure intellect...


                  Hello luminman!

                  There is no intelligence there, not even lying next to it.
                  It’s just that through the efforts of incompetent media, the identity of the concepts of “Neural Network” and “AI” has been introduced into the minds of people. Plus, advertisers are promoting the topic of “smart” devices such as vacuum cleaners, irons and kettles, as they once exploited the term “fuzzy logic” in relation to non-binary controllers for household appliances.
                  And experts, speaking about systems with artificial neural networks (ANN), only in rare cases and with great care can mention “individual elements of AI”.
                  ANNs do not have the intelligence of the word "completely". Yes, they are not programmed in the usual sense of the word, they are "trained". The ability to learn is one of the main advantages of neural networks over traditional algorithms. Technically, learning consists in finding the optimal coefficients of connections between neurons. In the learning process, the neural network acquires the ability to identify complex relationships between input and output data, as well as perform their generalization.
                  In practice, the use of ANNs is reduced to four classes of tasks for processing super-large arrays of input data:
                  Classification is the assignment of objects represented by an input multidimensional data vector to one of the given categories according to given characteristics, that is, the recognition of numerical images that describe objects of any physical nature. Classical examples are recognition of wanted persons in a video stream from surveillance cameras, fixing the facts of traffic violations with reference to license plates of cars, forensic identification of various kinds of traces at a crime scene, etc.
                  Clustering - differs from classification by the absence of predefined classes and predefined features. The ANN itself selects the features by which the input data can be grouped, and on this basis forms classes of objects. This is how, for example, a stylistic analysis of texts is carried out, and in the same way telecom operators analyze the activity of their subscribers to optimize their tariff policy. A highly demanded product is information about the Internet activity of users, "raw" audio and video streams circulating in communication networks and received from all kinds of "smart" gadgets. Such data allows you to create very targeted advertising, and at the same time accumulate multi-factor personal profiles “for the future”.
                  Forecasting is the prediction of the state of the object of observation based on the dynamics of its previous states. Areas of application - from stock indices and indicators of the economic activity of an enterprise to monitoring the status of complex technical objects, medical diagnoses and the prospects for changes in the socio-political situation.
                  Content generation - until recently, such systems were in the segment of multimedia entertainment (morphing images, audio and video streams, creating images by text request, etc.). The situation changed radically on November 30, 2022, when the ChatGPT chatbot from OpenAI was launched. This ANN, trained on billions of texts, is capable of providing detailed, highly relevant and high-quality responses to non-formalized text queries (from humorous miniatures to pre-dissertation research or program code for solving a specific problem, although without references to sources).

                  Yes, there is no enumeration of templates in the ANN, but where is the intelligence here?

                  Best regards,
                  hi
                  1. -4
                    April 29 2023 11: 30
                    Quote: OldMichael
                    where is the intellect?

                    Intelligence in the facial recognition system mentioned above. Example: the data of terrorists is included in the database - the distance between the eyes and between the ears, the length of the nose, the characteristics and dimensions of the skull, etc. Now imagine that a person who does not want to get under the attention of lenses pulls a knitted cap over his head completely. This is where AI really starts thinkrather than iterate over patterns. Well, chess, which I mentioned too...
                    1. +3
                      April 29 2023 11: 37
                      Quote: Luminman
                      a person who does not want to get under the attention of lenses pulls a knitted cap over his head completely. This is where AI starts to really think, and not sort through templates

                      Everything is easier. Having put on a hat - is included in the list of "potential candidates" according to the criteria that are hidden under this very hat. No more. Thinking for this is absolutely necessary request
                      1. -3
                        April 29 2023 11: 46
                        Quote: Repellent
                        a list of "potential candidates" according to the criteria that are hidden under this very cap

                        Can you imagine what a colossal amount of memory this your list of "potential candidates". That's the power of AI, that it can replace the hardware of a machine, just thinking...
                      2. The comment was deleted.
                      3. +3
                        April 29 2023 12: 36
                        Quote: Luminman
                        Can you imagine what a colossal amount of memory this list of "potential candidates" of yours can take up?

                        According to an estimate - for half the population of the Earth (4 * 10 ^ 9) the array of keys will take 15 GB. What is actually a little Yes
                        The infa itself will take, of course, a multiple more, but this, too, is quite digestible.
                        A "list of candidates" is just a list of keys. Even if all 4 billion people put on their hats, the list will be 15 gigs. Total request

                        Quote: Luminman
                        That's the power of AI, that it can replace the hardware of a machine just by thinking...

                        A machine cannot think. The machine must ride (C) laughing
                      4. +5
                        April 29 2023 16: 05
                        Dear Luminman,
                        In simple words about the complex about face recognition.
                        1. A base is being created, without it, nowhere. It should contain those we are looking for. Sure, otherwise we won't find it.
                        2. According to the characteristic points of the face (distances, ratios, angles, etc.), a unique code is created that meets the parameters.
                        3. The analyzed person undergoes a similar procedure too. those have one more code.
                        4. We start comparing the codes in the database and the existing one. Comparison based on the correlation function. Codes that are most similar give a greater result in the output. If you process two identical codes - the signal is maximum.
                        5. As a result, the answer of the system is this - conditionally 3 options with a match of 90%, 10 with 80%, etc.
                        6. And then the person himself looks and decides which of, for example, three is more suitable according to other criteria.
                        Don't trust any movie.
                        And they process fingerprints, sonar signals on submarines and many other data in a similar way.
                      5. +2
                        April 29 2023 21: 25
                        Quote: Luminman
                        That's the power of AI, that it can replace the hardware of a machine just by thinking....


                        The neural network does not know how to think. Properly tuned synaptic connection coefficients establish an acceptable relevance of output signals relative to input data. Determining these coefficients is another hemorrhoid, called "deep learning".
                        As part of overcoming this gimor, a new branch of mathematics was born - neuromathematics, the core of which was built around minimizing the error function.
                        hi
                    2. +1
                      April 29 2023 21: 17
                      Quote: Luminman
                      the database contains the data of terrorists - the distance between the eyes and between the ears, the length of the nose, the characteristics and dimensions of the skull, etc.


                      No. It doesn't work like that.
                      (cons - not mine) hi
          2. +5
            April 29 2023 10: 20
            Hello colleague!

            Quote from Bingo
            This comes from the very principle of supposedly "intelligence" and its "self-learning" based on enumeration of patterns

            Quote from Bingo
            nichrome similar to intelligence was not lying around here


            Indeed, a neural network does not emulate intelligence. But at the same time, she does not sort through the templates, they are not there. However, templates can be used in systems containing a neural network in a control loop.
            More details in the comment above.

            hi
            1. +3
              April 29 2023 10: 33
              Once, at a very representative international seminar on information technology, an American said the following about a then fashionable topic.
              "Talking about it is like teenagers talking about sex. Everyone talks, some try, only a few succeed."
              Therefore, try to evaluate the available artificial intelligence in the chat https://gpt-chatbot.ru/ you can set a topic and get an answer. Can someone suggest other test sites?
              1. +3
                April 29 2023 21: 15
                Quote: balabol
                try to evaluate the available artificial intelligence in the chat https://gpt-chatbot.ru/

                Apparently, for discussion on this topic, it is necessary to define the concept of "intelligence".
                And here an ambush awaits: there is no consensus on this matter. Someone rests on creativity, someone - on non-trivial solutions (although this is also a variant of creativity), someone - on emotions, etc.
                As a result: to talk about an orange, it is not enough to taste something that someone called an orange. To begin with, it is worth agreeing on what we are ready to consider an orange.
                hi
                1. +3
                  April 29 2023 23: 07
                  This is right. To agree on the concepts - the parameters of the phenomenon, on the methods of measuring the parameters, and then what values ​​of the parameters accurately characterize this or that type of phenomenon. But who can stand it in disputes. Arguing starts from the "tail"
              2. +2
                April 30 2023 13: 32
                On the topic of the site, you can see that, judging by the picture with the cannon, in 1751-1772 the barrels were drilled vertically inverted, that is, the drill was drilled from the bottom up, and the cannon was lowered from top to bottom. This is a good solution for removing chips and mold residues by its own weight, but here is the drive... the drive shows a pole with a harness for a horse, donkey or some other animal. There is no step-up gearbox in the figure, that is, for each revolution of the drill, the donkey passed a circle, these are about the first revolutions per minute, but with a fair amount of cutting force.
                Of course, here we need to talk not about drilling, but about boring the barrel after casting. This technology is very primitive, similar "spin huts" were in the time of Ivan the Terrible, and under Mikhail Fedorovich. There is only one drawback of this approach - the need to raise and lower the tool, that is, hard work, a fair risk of dropping it and nailing the worker, and even in bad weather it is impossible to heat such a workshop - it’s warm under the ceiling, and the ice probably didn’t melt below, that is, workers get colds, There were no antibiotics back then.
                Horizontal drilling of trunks appeared only in the 19th century.
                1. Fat
                  +3
                  April 30 2023 21: 12
                  hi Alex.
                  John Wilkinson received a patent for a horizontal drilling machine for solid castings of cannon and gun barrels in 1744.
                  1. +2
                    April 30 2023 22: 59
                    Alexey.
                    Monge's treatise, published in 1794, describes the experience of making cannons, implemented at his factories since 1777. horizontal way. The barrels rotate and the drills are fed along the axis of the barrel. Therefore, it is not worth categorically asserting that this technology began to be used in the 19th century.
                    Here is an illustration from the Russian translation.
                    1. -1
                      3 May 2023 08: 57
                      Quote: Thick
                      John Wilkinson received a patent for a horizontal drilling machine for solid castings of cannon and gun barrels in 1744.

                      Inoperable, the gun is drawn motionless. That is, the withdrawal of the drill and so on.
                      Quote: balabol
                      Raktate Monge,

                      Where did you find it? Despite the fact that the author died more than 100 years ago, and the works are in the public domain, some scammers sell the full text, and the search finds bits.
                      It is possible that Monge invented this method, and the rest copied from him. If the book was published in 1794, then the technology spread massively just in the 19th century.
            2. +1
              April 29 2023 11: 40
              Quote: OldMichael
              But at the same time, it does not sort out templates

              When you were little, your mother taught you in which hand to hold a spoon and in which fork. She taught me how to tie my shoelaces and dry my feet in the hallway. Figuratively speaking, these are all templates. In the same way, any machine learns - everything that is possible is hammered into it on the subject that it will serve. And when she, the machine, starts to work, she first sorts through the templates embedded in it, and then, relying on them, she starts think...
            3. +2
              April 29 2023 11: 46
              Quote: OldMichael
              hello

              hi
              I wrote about templates to simplify, not everyone is able to generate a detailed answer so that a slightly smaller author's article comes out wink
              But the meaning is the same, by the way, after all, all 4 types of activity can be attributed to templates or (clustering) - creating a template. The same generation - a crudely stupid matrix multiplication, apparently not? I’m not saying that it’s 100%, but it looks very similar, and the principle is the same - template combinatorics
              1. +2
                April 29 2023 21: 37
                Quote from Bingo
                all 4 types of activities can be attributed to templates

                No.
                I will not write here a course of banal lectures.
                Ask Yandex about how a perceptron works. Modern networks work in exactly the same way, but contain millions of synaptic connections, including feedback both in one layer of neurons and between layers, which makes it possible to implement the mechanisms of associative memory and self-learning.
                (By the way, the theoretical foundations of neural networks and "iron" samples were developed in the USSR in the 1950s-1960s)
                hi
    2. +4
      April 29 2023 06: 42
      Surprisingly, the first post to the article was marked with a minus! Traditionally, a fighting hamster silently blurted out a “minus” and ran away !!! laughing
      Now to the comment about artificial intelligence - everything unknown always causes deep fear, but humanity does not learn from its mistakes, so the “rake” with artificial intelligence is not the biggest trouble of the future homo sapiens, but only one of the troubles.
      Thanks to the author, comrades have a good day!
    3. +4
      April 29 2023 16: 13
      In principle, this AI is a funny thing. It will be necessary to try to write an article with his help. And then stuffing the letters yourself is somehow tedious. If it works out, I'll tell you.
  2. -2
    April 29 2023 06: 18
    Russia is not mentioned.
    Englishwoman crap.
    And there was a simple dependence on smarter, more inquisitive, quirky, resourceful and brazen impudent ones.
    The fate of Paul 1 was determined as follows: the inert Russian nobles (slave) obeyed (a semi-colony, supplies of raw materials) the English ambassador. They bought ready-made.
    In Polish textbooks, how are the causes of wars for secession from the growing empire described? There is probably silence about the ambition of the gentry.
    And about the progress and light of civilization in the dark realm of the barbarians?
    "Technical progress" against "whatever you want" your majesty.
    Independent income does not depend on the monarch.
    A certain tax against complete submission in everything.
    Money...
  3. Fat
    +2
    April 29 2023 07: 16
    hi A very good review. Thank you Vladimir Now I look forward to the next article, I'm sure it will turn out to be a wonderful cycle about the industrial revolution and its various consequences.
    It is always interesting to read about everything related to the development of technology and technology in this most interesting period, changes in society and their connections...
    Well, then to share "considerations", of course. smile
    With respect.
    1. +2
      April 29 2023 16: 15
      Thank you, but do not wait for the continuation, "considerations" will now be in place.
      1. Fat
        +1
        April 29 2023 17: 34
        "No guns" talk about iron-crazy John Wilkinson is going to be a bit off-kilter
        smile
        1. +2
          April 29 2023 19: 09
          Well, he "trampled" in a lot of places in the heavy industry.
  4. +2
    April 29 2023 09: 01
    Quote: Luminman
    When you solve a problem, don't you sort through the patterns in your head to give the final result?


    If the desired template is not found, a person (though not everyone) can create his own.
    What about the car?
    Intelligence is not only limited to analysis, but is also capable of synthesis, the creation of fundamentally new content. Until the last AI - still far away, the grapes are green.
    No, still real artificial intelligence, there is only a machine reflection of the intellect of the creators of these machines, nothing more.
    1. +2
      April 29 2023 09: 36
      Quote: Illanatol
      No, still real artificial intelligence

      We are on the wave of another technological revolution. And this is far from her peak. And to answer your question - there is no real AI, I agree. While no...
  5. +3
    April 29 2023 10: 14
    These bristles were torn from tufts of cotton
    The inventor himself wrote that the idea was born when he saw how a cat tried to grab a chicken through a wire grill, but she got only a few feathers.
    Jenny is the name of the inventor's daughter
    Most likely, Jenny (English abbr. Jennifer) - the collective name of a girl from the common people - is like Masha in Russian. Spinning Jenny - spinning Masha smile . Something like this
  6. +2
    April 29 2023 10: 23
    Oh, apparently, the author really loves all these gear levers ... smile
    And for me, the article is one big disappointment. At first, with my by no means technical mind, I tried to delve into the technical details described in it (with difficulty, but it turned out smile ), and then, when the most interesting thing began - how these technical subtleties changed the world - everything suddenly ended. smile
    I am surprised at the author's ability to write about boring mechanics in a rather exciting and interesting way, and, most importantly, understandable even to such a layman in technical matters like me. smile
    1. +6
      April 29 2023 10: 41
      "And for me, the article is one big disappointment." Michael, from this place in more detail, please. There was 70 characters of material, up to 18 were cut off, but this is a lot. I had to write the conclusions as briefly as possible. And this is without economy and finance. What are your suggestions for what is missing?
      1. +5
        April 29 2023 11: 38
        Quote: balabol
        from this place in more detail

        Having forced my way through the technical part, leaving shreds of my tender skin on studs, shafts, shafts and drums, I seemed to have got out into the territory of history proper, at the very least familiar to me, and then - oops! - the article is over. How can you not be disappointed? smile
        Never mind. "Disappointment" is just a joke, the article is good. smile
        1. +4
          April 29 2023 15: 47
          Michael, evaded a direct answer. And what is important in prom. revolution is most interested in.? Finance acquires new qualities. Globalization options are being worked out. The colonial economy is undergoing major changes.
          1. +5
            April 29 2023 16: 42
            In this case, the most interesting thing is probably the numbers.
            How did the introduction of this or that invention affect the quantity of output of this or that product, how did it affect the economy, finances, the size of the army, its equipment, the foreign policy of the state ... Such a chain, if it could be carried out, would be very clear and indicative .
            But this, I hope, awaits us in future articles. smile
            1. +4
              April 29 2023 17: 38
              To some extent it is, but more on the example. Here is the story with cotton. There was a low yield, let's say 25%. That is, in a ton of cotton, 800 kg after the sale pay operating expenses, and 1/4 of the expenses (investments) - income. Now productivity has increased by 4 times. With the same operating (800 kg) in income 3200 kg. Let transport costs (probably) increase and payments for a loan taken to buy a car are difficult to say, let half of the income go away. But in the end, instead of 200 kg, the owner of the plantation will get 1600 kg in net profit, those are 8 times. So look, would your well-being improve if incomes increased 8 times? Would you try to fight those who are trying to destroy this state of affairs? That is, if before that it was possible to think about closer economic integration with the northern states, now we don’t really want to. The northerners, building a sovereign economy, tried to fence themselves off from Britain with tariffs so as not to let industrial products into their market, while the southerners, on the contrary, cooperated with Britain as the most profitable buyer of raw materials and received goods from there in exchange for cotton. This is one aspect of the North-South conflict.
              This sucks simply on the supply of the influence of technology on the development trends of the state.
              1. +3
                April 29 2023 18: 01
                Quote: balabol
                This sucks simply on the supply of the influence of technology on the development trends of the state.

                So I thought it would be nice to see all this in the article. smile
                And if specific figures are given, then it’s generally fine.
                We all know that the rapid development of industry in Germany was one of the main causes of the First World War. But in relation to the Napoleonic wars, such an analysis would be new to me personally. At the same time, the fact that you are very well versed in pieces of iron will, in my opinion, give such material both brilliance and visibility.
                I am not trying to persuade you to something and, moreover, God forbid, to teach something. I have repeatedly said, and I am ready to repeat: I believe that the author is the master of his work and can do what he sees fit without looking back at anyone on the simple basis that he is the author. And we - the readers - can only express our opinion on the already finished material: like it or not like it.
                Everyone has the right to write a book and everyone has the right not to read it.
                smile I like what you are doing, and my expectations, as Andrei Arshavin once said, are my problems.
      2. +3
        April 30 2023 13: 35
        Consider writing about the history of cannon drilling. And on the topic of the site, and it will be interesting. Just warn right away that you will be banned for discussing AI.
        And the text does not mention that the "industrial revolution" was based on two phenomena - the invention in 1829 of hot blast, and the freedom of rural Americans from taxes until 1914, that is, a factory outside the city paid almost nothing to anyone.
        1. +2
          April 30 2023 15: 00
          I will answer the points:
          1. Drilling cannon barrels is interesting. But too deep into the technology. There it is necessary to compare several technologies - horizontal and vertical drilling, a movable shaft or a drill. Trunnion machining, cast hole in the barrel or one-piece cast barrel with full subsequent drilling.
          2. There is a free territory who wants to talk about what he writes about. Authors do not manage comments. Site owners are banned for breaking the rules. AI is not a violation.
          3. Strictly speaking, there is an insane amount of things left out of the text about the industrial revolution. Enumeration of phenomena without a description will take up exactly the entire volume allocated for an article of 12 thousand characters.
          4. Prom. the revolution did not rely on hot blast - this is only an element of its (revolution) development, and not at the start.
          5. The freedom of rural Americans from taxes is absolutely not the basis of prom. revolution and not its support. It is enough to compare the level of industrial development in Europe and the USA in the 19th century.
  7. +5
    April 29 2023 11: 19
    For today's site, an article of this level is a rare guest, one can only thank the author.
    Unfortunately, in the first part, it was not possible to come close to discussing Monge's work on the manufacture of cannons. But let's leave that for the next part.

    But what about the rest of the other industries - metallurgy, engineering, energy? Shall we go straight from the textile industry to militarism?
    1. +4
      April 29 2023 15: 42
      Yes, it's not right to go straight to the guns. Metallurgy and mechanical engineering, metalworking, transport and steam engines, the power supply of industry ... a long list.
  8. +4
    April 29 2023 11: 20
    An example of communication with artificial intelligence
    Question to artificial intelligence: "The sixth industrial revolution is coming. What is its essence"
    Answer within 10 seconds:

    The sixth industrial revolution is a concept that refers to a new stage in the development of science and technology, in which the main role belongs to technologies such as artificial intelligence, automation of production processes, the Internet of things, blockchain and many others. These technologies are united in the general concept of "digital economy", which changes the habitual way of life of people and traditional business models.

    The main principle of the sixth industrial revolution is the creation of integrated platforms that combine various devices and technologies into one ecosystem, which allows you to receive data and analyze them. These platforms become the basis for creating new business models and the emergence of new products and services.

    The sixth industrial revolution brings changes to various areas of life, such as medicine, education, transportation and urban infrastructure. It strengthens the relationship between people and technology, increasing the speed and efficiency of information exchange and creating new opportunities for business development and innovation.
  9. +2
    April 29 2023 12: 00
    "The Foundry" by John Ferguson Weir (1866)

    nothing has changed in a hundred and fifty years request
  10. +3
    April 29 2023 13: 15
    I kept waiting for it to be about guns, I didn’t wait. About textiles, too, turned out well. Respect to the author.
    1. +2
      April 29 2023 14: 50
      Sergey, it didn’t fit about the guns. And Monge's treatise in Russian can be found on the Internet. The truth is not easy to read. Technical language is archaic. It is necessary to have modern reference books close at hand.
  11. +1
    April 30 2023 08: 30
    Quote: Luminman
    We are on the wave of another technological revolution. And this is far from her peak. And to answer your question - there is no real AI, I agree. Not yet...


    I do not see a particularly technological revolution. The technological breakthrough was in 1900-1960. It was then that a lot of new things really appeared and development proceeded rapidly.
    And now ... it is enough to familiarize yourself with the forecasts of futurologists half a century ago and compare them with our realities ... however, we have fallen into a swamp.
    And even those fundamentally new technologies that have appeared are somehow slowing down. Nanotechnologies and all sorts of 3D printers have not yet turned our lives upside down. Transport and energy ... also do not shine, to a controlled fusion - like walking to the moon. In space... still flying chemical rockets, Voyager's speed record looks set to hold for a long time to come.
    So what about the "wave" - ​​somewhat exaggerated.
    And if everything goes on as it is now, the threat of competition from AI may simply be irrelevant. How many seconds are left on the "Doomsday Clock" before midnight?
  12. +1
    April 30 2023 08: 41
    Quote: balabol
    The main principle of the sixth industrial revolution is the creation of integrated platforms that combine various devices and technologies into one ecosystem, which allows you to receive data and analyze them. These platforms become the basis for creating new business models and the emergence of new products and services.

    The sixth industrial revolution brings changes to various areas of life, such as medicine, education, transportation and urban infrastructure. It strengthens the relationship between people and technology, increasing the speed and efficiency of information exchange and creating new opportunities for business development and innovation.


    Drives your AI like a drunken coachman.
    Since all of the above concerns, first of all, not industry and production, but only marketing, management, sales, services and consumption.

    And like a cherry on a cake. All of these innovations increase the effectiveness of society management by the elite (which will determine the patterns for AI).
    1. +2
      April 30 2023 12: 19
      Well, firstly, not "your", but "our" AI. Use and you, no one forbids. I hope you understand that this is an example on an accessible platform and nothing more. The developer tests the algorithms on millions of users. But as they say, a smart person will benefit from a mediocre product, and a stupid microscope will hammer nails. Everything is within our power.
  13. +1
    April 30 2023 08: 45
    Quote: sergej_84
    But what about the rest of the other industries - metallurgy, engineering, energy? Shall we go straight from the textile industry to militarism?


    Militarism is one of the most powerful locomotives of the scientific and technological process, alas.
    Even the textile industry. Textile factories produced products for the needs
    military fleet (then still sailing). Thanks to this, the Dutch (and later the British) had the largest and most powerful fleets.
  14. +2
    April 30 2023 09: 02
    Quote: Luminman
    To close this topic, let me remind you of a program that can play chess. And play well, beating grandmasters easily. There are no templates - pure intellect...


    A game where there are no templates is a "game of Chapaev"! Shoot down figurines with clicks ...

    Chess is just based on patterns, just like any game based on rules.
    The rules themselves are templates!
    And you can also remember that chess has a long history, there is a lot of information about chess games and the most successful combinations of moves in them. Of course, AI owns this information and uses it much more quickly than the human brain, whose clock frequency is very low. That's what makes chess computers take over, their skill in the game is a function of their performance.
    A person simply does not keep up, even when computers (not as powerful) help him, as they helped Kasparov.

    But could at least one chess computer play a truly original etude, like some Botvinnik? That's the same...

    Analysis is only one side of the intellect. Synthesis, creativity, creation of a fundamentally new one is different, more complex and more valuable.

    And do not be afraid of AI rebellion. For this, one intellect is not enough, one needs will and motivation. The latter is outside the realm of the intellect itself.
  15. +1
    April 30 2023 13: 46
    Quote: balabol
    Well, firstly, not "your", but "our" AI. Use and you, no one forbids. I hope you understand that this is an example on an accessible platform and nothing more.


    I did not ask questions to this AI. That is, he was not my "interlocutor" - that's why I used "your".
    I do not see a special need for myself, for now, at least. Search engines don't count; it has nothing to do with intelligence.
    Why create artificial intelligence at all, if we still cannot handle the natural sense? Yes, it makes sense to expand the capabilities of the latter technologically, but there is simply no need to create a synthetic alternative.
    And to solve purely technological problems that fit perfectly into ready-made templates, intelligence is not needed. Rather, it is a synthetic instinct, reflex activity (which is completely imitated by the existing software).
    1. +1
      April 30 2023 15: 03
      And personally, I like to try everything new, twist it. Maybe with this chat the search will be more convenient, it has more database volumes and other algorithms.
  16. +1
    1 May 2023 08: 43
    Quote: eule
    and the freedom of rural Americans from taxes until 1914, that is, a factory outside the city paid almost nothing to anyone.


    If we are talking about the United States, then the basis of their rapid industrial growth in the pre-war (before the First World War) was a very tough policy of protectionism and geographical isolation from more developed (at that time) European competitors. As well as the availability of a convenient market for their goods - Latin America.
  17. +4
    1 May 2023 20: 39
    The only difference between intellect and reason is that “intellectus” is from Latin, and reason is a Russian word. Intelligence is the ability to process information on the proposed tasks. Mind is the creative ability to build new objects or realize existing objects up to the world order, while the mind uses intelligence and knowledge. The mind offers a person the most correct behavior. The fact that intelligence is the quality of the mind.
    bolshoyvopros.ru

    I would clarify.
    The mind is able to play on paradoxes, to see them as a way to solve the problem. It is unlikely that even a powerful intellect, especially an artificial one, is capable of this.
    Intellect rejects paradoxes.

    Vladimir, thanks for the article!
    Sorry for not responding right away.
    Looking forward to more posts, the more the better.
  18. +1
    2 May 2023 08: 36
    Quote: depressant
    I would clarify.
    The mind is able to play on paradoxes, to see them as a way to solve the problem. It is unlikely that even a powerful intellect, especially an artificial one, is capable of this.
    Intellect rejects paradoxes.


    In short, the mind is capable of insight, of intuition. Which are not characteristic of the machine.
    Artificial intelligence can only be created on the basis of our knowledge of thought processes. Our knowledge is incomplete and flawed, so it is possible to create on its basis only some kind of incomplete and flawed copy.
    It is impossible even theoretically to create an intellect that would be fundamentally different from a human one (so to speak, non-humanoid). And communication with just such a fundamentally different would be the most interesting.
    1. 0
      3 May 2023 09: 03
      Quote: Illanatol
      To create an intellect that would be fundamentally different from the human (so to speak, non-humanoid),

      As long as he succeeds. Based on the principle of enumeration of facts by keywords and their combinations. And the human probably operates not with words, but with images. And that's not a fact.
      Even an attempt to make TRIZ did not lead to anything, among the followers of Altshuler there are no significant inventors who have created something really new. TRIZ is rather a rationalization technology.
  19. +1
    3 May 2023 09: 40
    Quote: eule
    As long as he succeeds. Based on the principle of enumeration of facts by keywords and their combinations.


    And what is in this non-humanoid?
    Then any schizoid can be written down as "non-humanoids".

    "In the circle of clouds high
    black-winged sparrow
    trembling and lonely
    proudly flies above the ground

    Like, "inhumanoid creativity"? Oh well.
    Jambs of algorithms and scripts should not be explained by inhumanity - everything is much simpler ...
  20. 0
    18 June 2023 15: 34
    As for the pictures... Something went wrong. There are almost none. It's a pity. I love all sorts of engravings... Eh!