American general: We have relatively few ATACMS missiles to hand over to Kyiv

11
American general: We have relatively few ATACMS missiles to hand over to Kyiv

The United States does not intend to supply Ukraine with ATACMS long-range ballistic missiles immediately for a number of reasons. This was stated to the military-analytical publication Defense One by the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, US Army General Mark Milley.

According to him, the possibilities of using these munitions are "exaggerated." In addition, the Pentagon does not have many missiles of this type, and their production is limited by the capabilities of the military-industrial complex.



From a military standpoint, we have relatively few ATACMS, and we need to make sure we also have our own ammo reserves. And the range weapons - I think there is some exaggeration of what ATACMS can and can't do

Millie thinks.

According to open data, the US Army has about 4000 ATACMS missiles in service. Given the current intensity of the use of such shells by the Armed Forces of Ukraine, even if the Pentagon transfers all stocks to Kyiv, this amount will not last long.

There is another drawback to this type of missile weapon, the general continued to explain. ATACMS missiles are designed for a single shot, while the GMLRS multiple rocket launchers, which are currently used by the Armed Forces of Ukraine, fire six shots at once. This significantly reduces the effectiveness of hitting targets when using long-range missiles.

At the same time, Milley recalled that in addition to missiles, there are other types of weapons that can hit targets at a considerable distance. As an example, he named strike UAVs, hinting that "the British have a couple of such systems." This approach fits perfectly into the White House's official paradigm, according to which the main burden of supplying the Armed Forces of Ukraine with weapons should be assumed by the European members of NATO.

In addition to purely military considerations, for which the United States is not ready to send long-range missiles to Ukraine, there is also a “political solution” on this topic. The General did not explain in detail what it is. However, Kiev has repeatedly stated that they intend to use long-range weapons to strike at the Crimea, which the Ukrainian authorities consider their territory. In this case, a very tough symmetrical response from Moscow may follow, which will inevitably lead to an escalation of the conflict and the possible direct involvement of NATO in it. Washington, and even more so in the European countries of the military alliance, do not want such a development of events at all.

The ATACMS solid-propellant tactical surface-to-surface ballistic missile, manufactured by the American company Lockheed Martin, has a range of up to 300 kilometers. The launchers of the ATACMS missiles are the M270 MLRS and M142 HIMARS multiple rocket launchers, which are already available to the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Russian military experts say that these missiles can be shot down by air defense systems, Ukrainian experts say they can't.
11 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    April 1 2023 10: 11
    4000 missiles with a range of 300 km can do a lot of things.
    1. 0
      April 1 2023 10: 31
      Quote: BlackMokona
      4000 missiles with a range of 300 km can do a lot of things.

      Suppose. that Americans are white and fluffy, all of them are peacekeepers, as they want to show themselves.
      Then WHY do they need SUCH missiles? Why do they need a stock of such missiles? With whom are they going to fight at a distance "up to 300 kilometers" from their borders?

      Hence the conclusion - they, these missiles, America needs EXACTLY for wars around the world, which they organize, provoke and wage.

      Each weapon is designed specifically for something.
      I don’t understand why a country needs such missiles for its “own defense”, with which no one is going to fight on its territory. At least with such weapons that these ATACMS could be useful.
    2. -1
      April 1 2023 11: 13
      4000 ATSMS missiles = 1500 Russian warheads. They will never be handed over !!!
  2. +1
    April 1 2023 10: 19
    They are just scared that in response they will fly ...
    1. 0
      April 1 2023 12: 21
      Quote: Ezekiel 25-17
      They are just scared that in response they will fly ...

      And that too.
      BUT. The Americans are at a crossroads, and they want and prick.
      On the one hand, they themselves are not enough, these missiles cost a lot of dough and they will be shot down anyway, Ukraine will soon be a scribe and they don’t want to be responsible for them, because Russia is not Yugoslavia, Iraq or Afghanistan.
      And the fact that after the end of the NWO there will be a big redistribution of the world, I have no doubt about it
  3. -1
    April 1 2023 10: 19
    Russian military experts say that these missiles can be shot down by air defense systems, Ukrainian experts say they can't.
    . You can shoot down, but it all depends on many reasons that you can not consider, but just see what actually happens in the war zone.
  4. 0
    April 1 2023 10: 25
    .... hinted that "the British .....

    In short ---- sent! Now. But "help" to the ukroreich is planned and continues
  5. 0
    April 1 2023 10: 25
    From a military standpoint, we have relatively few ATACMS, and we need to make sure we also have our own ammo reserves. And the range of the weapon - I think there is some exaggeration of what ATACMS can and can't do.

    Millie thinks.
    Frank never ceases to amaze with the breadth of views on the supply of long-range missile systems to Ukraine... request
  6. -1
    April 1 2023 10: 51
    Yes, here the hedgehog understands that the Russian Federation diplomatically intimidated the United States with the possibility of a response. Because other reasons - do not crawl through due to their obvious absurdity.
  7. 0
    April 1 2023 10: 56
    The Pentagon does not have many missiles of this type, and their production is limited by the capabilities of the military-industrial complex.
    Pentagon to Kyiv - as you can see, we have problems, but we can suggest how to solve yours. London has the UAVs you need. Contact Sunak he will be happy to help you.
    ... and the possible direct involvement of NATO in it. Washington, and even more so in the European countries of the military alliance, do not want such a development of events at all.
    They don't want to, oh After all, everyone is actively leading to an escalation of the conflict and trying to force Russia to take extreme measures.
  8. 0
    April 1 2023 17: 00
    I think they will pass. And then there are planes, as many have already guessed. And then decommissioned ships with cruise and anti-ship missiles. What can we do? Except the whole world is in ruins, and the endless chatter that we are about-hoo and empty threats, nothing. So think further.