Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation Medvedev criticized the idea of ​​sending "peacekeepers" to Ukraine: "These are wolves in sheep's clothing"

36
Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation Medvedev criticized the idea of ​​sending "peacekeepers" to Ukraine: "These are wolves in sheep's clothing"

The idea of ​​sending some “peacekeepers” to Ukraine under the auspices of NATO, which is being discussed in Europe, covers up the goal of establishing a peace that is beneficial for the Kyiv regime from a position of strength on the line of contact between the parties. Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, wrote about this on his Telegram channel.

As the politician noted, the very fact that NATO offers its "peacekeeping services" is a manifestation of cynicism. The true intentions of such "peacekeeping" actions are the deployment of NATO troops to tanks и с weapons in his hands, in "blue helmets with yellow stars."



According to Medvedev, such "peacekeepers" will simply enter into conflict on the side of the Kyiv regime. After that, the situation will reach the point of no return, the third world war will be unleashed, which the West is so afraid of in words, the politician writes. All such "peacekeeping" operations of the West in different parts of the world, the deputy chairman of the Security Council noted, ended in tragedy.

It is also obvious that such "peacekeepers" are our direct enemies. Wolves in sheep's clothing. They will be a legitimate target for our Armed Forces if they are placed on the front line without the consent of Russia with weapons in their hands and directly threaten us

- wrote Medvedev.

He stressed that in this case, such "peacekeepers" would be ruthlessly destroyed as soldiers of the enemy, combatants. Therefore, they will die during the hostilities, Medvedev noted, and asked the Europeans if they are ready for a "line of coffins" of their compatriots if they go to Ukraine to serve in the so-called "peacekeeping" contingent.
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    31 March 2023 16: 54
    minus just for Medvedev ... zadolbal.
    1. +6
      31 March 2023 17: 20
      Quote: Aerodrome
      minus just for Medvedev ... zadolbal.

      That's right!
      By the way, Dmitry Anatolyevich, how do you feel about paragraph 12 of Prigozhin's "Victory Plan"? Or you chat, do not carry bags. winked
      . Item 12.
      During the Second World War, two relatives and one adopted son of Stalin fought. Until this happens in our country, the people will not fully believe that the entire leadership of the country is interested in the Victory.
      1. +1
        31 March 2023 17: 48
        Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation Medvedev criticized the idea of ​​sending "peacekeepers" to Ukraine: "These are wolves in sheep's clothing"

        Medvedev said everything correctly. And it would be WRONG if he just kept silent about this.
        The world should know the NEGATIVE position of Russia on this issue!

        Down with foreign imaginary "PEACEKEEPERS"!
        All these foreign alleged "Peacekeepers" will certainly represent precisely those countries that are the PARTIES to the military conflict in Ukraine or their accomplices!
        They have NO faith!
        1. +3
          31 March 2023 18: 19
          Quote: Tatiana
          Medvedev said everything correctly.

          The words are correct.
          Only here EXACTLY HIM someone asked?

          This is not the first time that an assumption has arisen - are they moving him into successors? Isn't the reshuffle preparing again? He changed his image, rhetoric, he plays iPhone when no one sees. Another would be an eagle profile and "Ride of the Valkyries" background noise ...
          The only trouble is that, as he was a technical figure, he remained. Nothing is said in the biography, but according to everything - the level of the secretary of the institute committee of the Komsomol. We, at least, had the same one - shabby, career, excessively active at the institute. A crushed "What do you want?" in the district committee and genuine happiness from what was "noted" in the city committee.

          Such knowledge in the psychology of Komsomol functionaries is not from personal experience. The wife of a friend worked as an instructor in the city committee. And ours, and dozens of others of the same saw, told.

          For me, it’s better to twist the Constitution as they want, leave the GDP, than SUCH as successors. Let him sit quietly, play badminton and climb in an iPhone ...
      2. AAK
        +2
        31 March 2023 17: 59
        A possible answer from DAM on this matter is - well, I'm not Stalin, I'm Medvedev ...
      3. 0
        31 March 2023 19: 05
        Quote: Terenin

        That's right!
        By the way, Dmitry Anatolyevich, how do you feel about paragraph 12 of Prigozhin's "Victory Plan"? Or you chat, do not carry bags.

        Everyone will go and you, too, will not sit out with your "peace plans".
        Prigozhin, by the way, did not appear on his own - he is precisely the project of Putin and Medvedev, but you fish do not understand that birds are flying over you.
    2. +4
      31 March 2023 18: 03
      Quote: Aerodrome
      minus just for Medvedev ... zadolbal.

      If it was possible to throw a "-" note, I would also throw it.
      But left the opportunity to only plus.

      Someone on the site is quietly promoting Medvedev.
      The vast majority of materials on the site goes behind the author's signature.
      Over the past 10 days, as many as 9 materials with Medvedev's statements have been placed in the news feed.
      Absolute record.
      And out of 9 materials 8 without attribution!
      Also a record.
      It is difficult to understand this differently than advertising Medvedev by the site itself.
      I wonder if such "love" is selfless?
      1. The comment was deleted.
  2. +6
    31 March 2023 16: 55
    Dmitry Anatolyevich. I don’t even want to listen to this fierce nonsense of yours often. Your fault is directly in what is happening in Ukraine now
    1. -2
      31 March 2023 17: 21
      it was Medvedev who fired Kudrin, who complained in Washington that Russia had increased its military budget.
      1. +3
        31 March 2023 17: 27
        Quote from nin
        it was Medvedev who fired Kudrin, who complained in Washington that Russia had increased its military budget.

      2. +6
        31 March 2023 17: 39
        Quote from nin
        it was Medvedev who fired Kudrin, who complained in Washington that Russia had increased its military budget.

        And where did he get fired? To the body controlling budget money - the Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation.
      3. +1
        31 March 2023 18: 28
        Quote from nin
        it was Medvedev who fired Kudrin

        Kudrin was fired for demonstrative insubordination, for bringing to light what everyone knows, but about which everyone was silent. Defiantly refusing to comply with the President's order, declaring to his face that "I need to consult with the Prime Minister" - such greyness was not forgiven even for this skin.
        Although then they marinated in silence for a bit - and again they quietly returned to the "financial and economic bloc".

        And it was not Medvedev who fired him, but the prime minister. Because this economic prostitute set up not the President, but the Prime Minister, flaunting what everyone knew without him - the President does not decide, he "warms the stool" so that they do not steal it in 4 years.

        And Washington has nothing to do with it.
  3. +2
    31 March 2023 16: 57
    16:16 In Ukraine, another "motivating" visit of European Russophobes - this time the prime ministers of Slovakia, Slovenia and Croatia arrived. In Kyiv, for the sake of this, the city center was blocked. The program is expected to be standard - a meeting with a clown and a visit to Bucha.

    Where is the Dagger for dear guests?
    Ezdeyut as to his country house.
    Shameful deal.
    Anger is not enough.
    1. +4
      31 March 2023 17: 11
      Quote: Rumata
      Where is the Dagger for dear guests?
      Ezdeyut as to his country house.
      Shameful deal.
      Anger is not enough.

      "Dagger" would embed on "dear" guests
      Without "agreements", like this - out of anger.
      To scraps, corpses and bones
      There wasn't enough room in the...
    2. -1
      31 March 2023 17: 24
      Where is the Dagger for dear guests?

      when, according to a good tradition, the siren is turned on in Kyiv, then you will gasp ..
    3. -6
      31 March 2023 17: 29
      It was under Medvedev that Russia won the war on 6 in 08.08.08 days.
      1. +2
        31 March 2023 17: 35
        Quote: Flibuster
        It was under Medvedev that Russia won the war on 6 in 08.08.08 days.

        So let him stomp in the General Staff.
        1. +2
          31 March 2023 18: 46
          Quote: mordvin xnumx
          Quote: Flibuster
          It was under Medvedev that Russia won the war on 6 in 08.08.08 days.

          So let him stomp in the General Staff.

          No! Only there it was not enough!
          We found a warm place for him - let him sit where he sits. It would also "shine" less.

          "Strategist and tactician" great, damn it ...
      2. Alf
        -2
        31 March 2023 18: 21
        Quote: Flibuster
        It was under Medvedev that Russia won the war on 6 in 08.08.08 days.

        I am not a fan of Putin, but only after he barked, the bear cub began the Forced Operation ... And didn’t the bear cub slow down our army when the Georgian army fled and the road to Tbilisi became open?
      3. +2
        31 March 2023 18: 42
        Quote: Flibuster
        It was under Medvedev that Russia won the war on 6 in 08.08.08 days.

        Will anyone be able to explain to me the specific role and specific actions of our Supreme Commander-in-Chief (at that time) and the Minister of Defense (at that time) in our Victory in that war?

        They did not make the decision and the will did not come from them.

        One can say about anyone in the country - "IT WAS UNDER HIM, Russia won the war in Georgia." And what, for example, specifically depended on me? Never mind.

        Although Marshal Taburetkin raped his gesheft - a medal for Georgia helped him get out of court, a witness to the theft and collapse, done by him and his "witches" in the army, through the case.
        I have a welder who "sat" for a long time and works well in the 90s. He told how many "behind the thorn" were our boys with Afghan KZ, "For Courage" and ZBZ. There was even one Hero of the Soviet Union in transit. It didn’t help them, Taburetkin’s almost jubilee medal turned out to be an impenetrable shield ...
        By the way, earlier for criminal offenses state awards were deprived. Now I do not know.
  4. +6
    31 March 2023 17: 00
    I regard any such statements from DAM as mere words. The usual self-promotion. Well, they do not fit with his "previous life."
    1. +2
      31 March 2023 17: 23
      Quote: Marlenych
      I regard any such statements from DAM as mere words. The usual self-promotion. Well, they do not fit with his "previous life."

      Yes, indeed, his merging of Libya (about which, by the way, he kept silent here) is his anchor in his further political voyage.
    2. +3
      31 March 2023 17: 25
      Quote: Marlenych
      I regard any such statements from DAM as mere words. The usual self-promotion. Well, they do not fit with his "previous life."

      Let's put it simply - the president's chair "marks".
      1. 0
        31 March 2023 18: 47
        Quote: skeptic
        Quote: Marlenych
        I regard any such statements from DAM as mere words. The usual self-promotion. Well, they do not fit with his "previous life."

        Let's put it simply - the president's chair "marks".

        Not "marking", but "pushing through".
  5. +4
    31 March 2023 17: 00
    If Russia has not agreed on the location of the peacekeepers, you can draw a sight on each blue helmet.
    1. -2
      31 March 2023 17: 08
      There are blue ones, there are some blue ones.
      _________
    2. +1
      31 March 2023 17: 16
      Draw a sight? How is it ?? Probably still a target? belay
    3. +1
      31 March 2023 17: 26
      , draw a sight.

      sprinkle with chalk..
  6. -3
    31 March 2023 17: 08
    These will be the same peacekeepers as the Wehrmacht in 1941.
  7. +2
    31 March 2023 17: 08
    The Finns joined NATO there. Someone promised heavenly punishment for this laughing
    1. 0
      31 March 2023 17: 27
      Someone promised heavenly punishment for such a laughing

      life will punish them - severely ..
  8. +2
    31 March 2023 17: 09
    Dmitry Anatolyevich is completely right, the appearance of peacekeepers without UN sanction, this is the third world war. We will not smash the whole West to the ground, though they will smash us too. And Asia, Africa and Latin America will win. there will be peace to the world.
  9. 0
    31 March 2023 17: 21
    I already wrote that the year will be terrible: God forbid, so that without a nucleus ...
    1. 0
      31 March 2023 17: 51
      Of course, without a nucleus, they will focus on the topic: a bad world (for the West) is better than a good war (for everyone). So it will be.
  10. +2
    31 March 2023 17: 21
    Right. And on the Chinese and Iranian with the Koreans, the West will already disagree. As a result, the life of the ancient Sumerians was difficult, they will be disposed of to the last one with weapons. However, in these territories it would not hurt the rule to kill anyone who comes out with a weapon against ours (no matter the age, gay orientation and the place of the sortie from the cache).
  11. +2
    31 March 2023 17: 24
    In the Western press, not a word about changing our International policy, not a word. We have a clearly named enemy there. Biden will not expel our diplomats because of a journalist. The State Department is boiling over how to answer so as not to get into trouble. from the West, having arrested a journalist, this is not concern, this is hysteria.