Lukashenko proposed to stop hostilities in Ukraine and ban the movement of equipment and weapons

The President of the Republic of Belarus delivers a message to the deputies of the parliament and the Belarusian people. One of the topics touched upon by Alexander Lukashenko is related to the events in Ukraine and the deployment of a Russian tactical nuclear weapon on the territory of the republic. weapons.

According to the President of Belarus, the deployment of nuclear weapons in the country is not an attempt to intimidate anyone.

Alexander Lukashenko:

I want to secure the Belarusian state and ensure peace for the Belarusian people. We don’t want to live under a whip and we won’t be slaves!

Speaking about the hostilities in Ukraine, the Belarusian leader called on the parties to a ceasefire without any preconditions.

Lukashenka proposed a ban on the movement of equipment and weapons from both sides after the ceasefire was announced.

President of the Republic of Belarus:

Russia used to ask Belarus for ammunition, today they don’t ask anyone, because the Russian military-industrial complex is deploying at full power. It won't seem like much. The Russians harness slowly, but they drive fast.

Lukashenka stressed that it is impossible to defeat a nuclear power, as dreamed of in Washington, Brussels and Kyiv.

President of Belarus:

If the Russian leadership sees that things are heading towards the collapse of Russia, they will use the most terrible weapon.

In his address, Lukashenka noted that it was the West and the regime controlled by it in Ukraine that brought the situation to a large-scale armed conflict, not wanting to hear anything about the interests of other countries.

Lukashenko:

You all know and understand - there is only one way. These are negotiations. Negotiations without preconditions.

President of the Republic of Belarus:

What other miracles: the president of a sovereign country signs a decree that concerns him specifically and forbids himself to negotiate peace. But that's funny. I speak as a president: if you don't want to negotiate, then don't negotiate. Why sign this decree? What does he want to show and to whom? I used to tell him: Volodya, there is a war going on in your land. Today you will be a hero, you will travel near Bakhmut, aka Artyomovsk, to present awards, and time will pass - the people will ask you: why didn’t you stop the war, why didn’t you prevent it.

Lukashenka pointed out that not Zelensky's children, not his relatives, are dying in Ukraine:

They may be somewhere on the Cote d'Azur. And those who should not die die.

Comments

[Kotofeich]

"What other miracles: the president of a sovereign country signs a decree that concerns him specifically and forbids himself to negotiate peace. But this is ridiculous."
Old man is burning .

[Clear]

Quote: Kotofeich

Dad is chewing.

Let him no longer sit on two chairs, but to be his own in each camp ... you can’t knock him out of the dad.
Hardening of the chairman of the Soviet collective farm

[credo]

Quote: Kotofeich

"What other miracles: the president of a sovereign country signs a decree that concerns him specifically and forbids himself to negotiate peace. But this is ridiculous."
Old man is burning .

Maybe Lukashenka simply wasn’t in the situation when, after a long breastfeeding and drinking coke, a person finally comes to his senses, looks at his wrinkled and bluish face in the mirror and says to himself - “That's it, from next Monday not a drop in mouth and no doses to the chest (nose)."

So there's not much funny here. A man like Zelensky needs a straitjacket for a long time, but rather a separate room in the prison zone without the right to ever leave.

[Filibuster]

The President of a sovereign country was forbidden to conduct peace talks with Russia by the owner of this sovereign country - the United States

[SKVichyakow]

Quote: Kotofeich

"What other miracles: the president of a sovereign country signs a decree that concerns him specifically and forbids himself to negotiate peace. But this is ridiculous."
Old man is burning .

Such a decree was signed by Zelensky himself. Lukashenka has nothing to do with it.

[Orange Bigg]

Lukashenko proposed to stop hostilities in Ukraine and ban the movement of equipment and weapons

How is it in the Anthem of Belarus? We are Belarusian peaceful people. It is commendable, but it is clear to everyone that this is impossible due to a number of reasons.

[dmi.pris1]

Okay, Lukashenko .. The main thing is that CAM in the Kremlin does not sing about "peaceful people" ...

[donavi49]

Already:
Putin and Lukashenko will discuss the call for a truce in Ukraine next week, — Peskov

[tralflot1832]

This is what you write in Israel like this, and in Russia like this:

It is necessary to have talent in the West in order to interpret Peskov’s words in this way. To your commentary of Western journalists, Guzeeva’s words, but not yet.

[fif21]

Quote: donavi49

Already:
Putin and Lukashenko will discuss the call for a truce in Ukraine next week, — Peskov

Unilateral truce? Lukashenka - take care of the sowing!
NATO will discuss the deployment of troops to Ukraine. Lukashenka wants to discuss a truce.

[Frank Muller]

And he from Istanbul (together with his team, in chorus, but in a whisper) has been singing these words for a long time already. Hey didn't you hear?

[NickShel]

So, after the criminal retreat from near Kyiv and Chernigov, he only does what he asks for negotiations.

[credo]

Quote from Orange Bigg

Lukashenko proposed to stop hostilities in Ukraine and ban the movement of equipment and weapons

How is it in the Anthem of Belarus? We are Belarusian peaceful people. It is commendable, but it is clear to everyone that this is impossible due to a number of reasons.

The proposal of Alexander Grigorievich is meaningless for Russia, as well as for the Donbass, Crimea, Zaporozhye and Kherson regions.
Since Russia will not have any opportunity to influence the situation in the remnants of Ukraine, in a couple of years a huge amount of Western weapons will be imported there at an accelerated pace, the population will be even more pumped up by Nazism, all areas of life will be militarized at an accelerated pace, and after this time Russia will receive the southwestern borders of the state is no different from Nazi Germany.

[Alex Nevs]

There are now such "pakarashchennya", sho the nervousness is already beginning and someone has stopped jumping. But the process is running and no one will stop it. so be patient. About the rest, listen to the source and not the Tiktoker "annalises".

[GREG68]

Old Man, as always, in his repertoire - both ours and yours. And he called Zelya a nit, and he hinted that I would bring the troops into the NVO zone. And now he is calling for negotiations without any preconditions.

[Orange Bigg]

Well, the army of Belarus is small and without combat experience, besides, there are so many threats around it, and it wants to protect its independence. Hence the calls for peace.

[AAK]

Well, Rygorych, well, a cunning, multi-chaired ass ... that means the green beaver to him - Volodya! So, you see, he and VVP will soon be called Volodya ... Fucking negotiator ... when his own white-red-white (or red-white-red, the hell will understand ...) were almost overthrown, so immediately cackled ... and now it's straight "Alexander the Peacemaker", his potato mother ...

[tralflot1832]

Since Saturday, Russia has been heading the UN Security Council for a month, hysteria has already begun in the west. The British, for example, call the Orchestrators "thugs" - that means everything is fine with us in Artyomovsk. Something tells me that A.G. Lukashenko launched a diplomatic attack on the west in time.

[Pulkovo1942]

the Belarusian leader called on the parties to a ceasefire without any preconditions

Amazing joke. We have already signed the Minsk agreements through a multi-vector approach - the result is known. And everyone remembers the consequences of humanitarian corridors, ceasefire regimes, etc. and so on. at the beginning of SVO.

[rotmistr60]

the Belarusian leader called on the parties to a ceasefire without any preconditions.

This call is certainly a good thing, but we have already gone through this with the "Minsk" and as it turned out on our own head. And again Germany and France as guarantors?

[Filibuster]

Speaking about the hostilities in Ukraine, the Belarusian leader called on the parties to a ceasefire without any preconditions.

Why this stupid and primitive populism from such an experienced politician as Alexander Lukashenko?
After all, it’s clear to the hedgehog, not like him, that there is an all-out war that will end only with a strategic defeat and capitulation of one of the parties and nothing else?
Or did Lukashenka see a radical turning point in the course of hostilities in Ukraine?
I personally don't see it.

[blackGRAIL]

No brainer that the military victory of one of the parties is not possible. In Korea, the acceptance phase took more than a year of unsuccessful offensive attempts on both sides.

[Filibuster]

The West has not yet lost hope of inflicting a defeat on the Russian Federation in Ukraine, and the society of Ukraine is pumped with possible moods over the edge, ready to die in packs for Bandera's Nazism and cut Rusnya.
The moral breakdown of the Armed Forces of Ukraine did not occur even in a year, NATO resources for supplying Ukraine with weapons, mercenaries and ammunition have not been exhausted.

[blackGRAIL]

Exactly. Just like the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, they have not exhausted their capabilities, albeit very slow, but advancement on the territory of the LDNR. Therefore, the conflict will continue for another 2-3 years. And then everything will depend on the plans of the United States. Russia is ready for a truce.

By the way, South Korea was also categorically against the ceasefire and demanded war until the complete liberation of the Korean Peninsula (and did not sign the ceasefire agreement). But the United States was not interested in her opinion and the result is known to everyone.

[Negro]

Quote from: blackGRAIL

No brainer that a military victory of one of the parties is not possible

Yes?

Why do you think so? What do you call a military victory? What aspects do you highlight?

[blackGRAIL]

Parties: Russia and Ukraine. Military victory - the surrender of one of the parties due to the defeat of its armed forces or their mass exodus / surrender with the acceptance of all the requirements of the opposite side.

In Ukraine, the Korean scenario will be implemented late or very late precisely because of the impossibility of a military victory for one of the parties.

[Negro]

Quote from: blackGRAIL

Parties: Russia and Ukraine

Not only.

Quote from: blackGRAIL

Military victory - the surrender of one of the parties due to the defeat of its Armed Forces

I don’t know how it is about the NWO, but wars in the modern world rarely end in this way. Maybe it happened, but I don’t remember a single case after WWII. Iraq 2003 is that.

Quote from: blackGRAIL

with the acceptance of all the requirements of the opposite side.

Those demands that the Russian side allows itself to voice will certainly not even be discussed.

Quote from: blackGRAIL

In Ukraine, the Korean scenario will be implemented late or very late

In Korea, the LBS division coincided with the "white world" - territorially, both Koreas remained on the same 38th parallel as at the beginning of the events. In Ukraine, we still see a slightly different situation.

I agree with you that the surrender of one of the parties in the style of the 45th year is hardly to be expected. However, an improvement in the position regarding the state today is still possible for both sides. Of course, in both cases, the question of the price of this "improvement" arises, but now it is clearly of no interest to anyone.

[donavi49]

The current truce is 0%.
APU + West will try their luck, because decently accumulated. Even very partial success => better negotiating positions. Partial-severe failure is considered a perfectly acceptable risk. Which +/- will not worsen anything.

Both sides will try their military luck in the spring and summer, guaranteed. If there is a stalemate (+/- nothing will change), then serious negotiations are possible by winter.

[Wildcat]

I agree.
But another important point, IMHO.

A truce or even any negotiations will raise the issue of lifting sanctions/"normalizing relations", at least in part.
Not for this, "comrades" from the East have been waiting for a "turn from the West" for so long, for example - Comrade Xi has already supported Comrade Putin in terms of the 2024 elections; and not for this, the "partners" from the West waited for the opportunity to "play with the markets and sanctions" like "From G8 to The Hague with a warrant; the best gas is LNG."

IMHO, too many actors can solve their problems during the conflict in / in Ukraine. Therefore, IMHO, 24-25 years look more realistic for the settlement of Ukrainian history.
But, to put it mildly, the world will definitely not be "as before", even "as under Brezhnev" will not be.
Why, under Brezhnev, even "as under Bush and Obama" will not be ....

[Negro]

Quote: donavi49

then serious negotiations are possible by winter

The Russian side does not care, the Ukrainian side has the next control point - the formation of budgets for 2024 in the EU and the USA. There is nothing to talk about, a ceasefire along the line of contact is the only possible option. Therefore, this line will be refined until October. Further on the basis of the results of the clarification Okay / Not Okay and the decision for the next year.

[Negro]

Quote: Flibuster

Why this stupid and primitive populism from such an experienced politician as Alexander Lukashenko?

To call for peace before the offensive of one of the parties, which has been talked about from every iron for half a year, is to play along with the defending side. So Lukashenka understands everything perfectly. A plus sign to karma (and possibly to a bank account).

[gromit]

Listened to his message.

"As a result of hostilities in Ukraine, the number of dead and wounded on both sides reached 500..."

"Negotiations without preconditions..."

Nikuyase. Isn't that discrediting?

And why is he now calling the nits Volodya?

"I want to secure the Belarusian state and ensure peace for the Belarusian people...."
But what about the union state?

"... people on both sides of the front in Ukraine are already beginning to agree - commanders of companies, platoons, battalion commanders, people do not want to fight .." But this???

He smoked vigorous potato tops ??

[Filibuster]

What kind of Volodya?
______________

[Mordvin 3]

Quote from Gromit

But what about the union state?

Yeah, right now, dad will drop everything and run to arrange a union state with the one that the NWO has been holding for the second year. Yes, he probably combed the whole bald patch in search of the eternal answer, "What to do?"

[gromit]

No wonder he went to Beijing.
About a ceasefire and negotiations without conditions, this is from Xi's plan.
I re-read 12 points, so they are quite clear.
Stop the fire, start negotiations, take out grain, do not touch nuclear power plants, do not interfere with trade.

[Negro]

Quote from Gromit

I re-read 12 points, so they are quite clear.

Not quite.

The first paragraph is extremely vague. about territorial integrity.

More precisely, it is clear - the position of the PRC on the borders of the Russian Federation is known - and the Russian Federation does not agree to it.

[gromit]

There is a clear point.

1. respect for the sovereignty of all countries, observance of international law and the UN Charter.
China or the UN recognized new territories?

We just can't believe it. That they dunk us in the face with shit.
And propaganda convinces that this is not shit, but a special chocolate recipe. China is supposedly cautious, the time has not yet come for it to break with the West, so it carefully spoils with special chocolate, which looks and smells like shit.

Many believe.

[Negro]

Quote from Gromit

That they dunk us in the face with shit.

It would be strange to expect the PRC specifically to recognize the right of the regions of any country to self-determination. Even regardless of all the nuances of the implementation of this right in the case under discussion.

[blackGRAIL]

He does not voice his wishes. He promotes the position of Moscow.

[fiv]

Any truce is the result of agreements and the belief that the opposite side will fulfill them. No one will fulfill any agreements on the other side. What naivete! Old Man, whose Crimea?

[Filibuster]

Somewhere I heard all this in my deep childhood ...

[pavel.tipin]

Negotiations are beneficial to the defender and the loser, because they allow for a regrouping of forces.

[AndreyKa54076]

Another peacemaker? Thank you, fed up with peace initiatives, Christmas truces, goodwill gestures and other verbal vomit for suckers like our powers that be! Only fire and blood... Until the last Ukrainian!

[Dmitry_Semashko]

Without Putin, dad would not have made such an offer. Putin speaks through the mouth of the father. And it is he who does not want the continuation of the NWO. He wants peace, gas trade, and figs would be with that Ukraine.

[evgen1221]

Yes, not really! And how is he going to control this ban on the movement of equipment, especially on their side? There are a lot of parties and no one obeys anyone, the special forces have their own war, the Bobby has its own, the Nazis have a third one, and we remember how the West fulfills contracts, yes, it will immediately rush to import herds of equipment until they shoot and dig in. The plan is good, but not in this universe, and not with this enemy.

[blackGRAIL]

Just as in Korea, the United States fulfilled its obligations under the demilitarized zone. The South Caucasus, if you remember, was categorically against it and did not sign the agreement at all.

[Frank Muller]

The classic position of a "multi-vector" politician: depending on the circumstances, one can call for peace or for war - it is not Belarus that is at war! And the war will come, so we'll come up with something else? He can call as much as he likes, but it is not for him to end the war.

[dump22]

Dad is just terribly cunning. And he certainly has an amazing flair, like a beast.
But someday he will finally get confused in his complex combinations.

I will outlive you all. You don't know Panikovsky. Panikovsky will sell you all, buy you and sell you again, but at a higher price.
...
You can immediately see a person from an early time! There aren't any now and there won't be any soon!