"We will be just a bedding for other nations"

32
"We will be just a bedding for other nations"
German Skoropadsky with his officers


Peasant War


Dictatorship of Skoropadsky ("Vulgar operetta" by Skoropadsky) could not stop the processes of disintegration of Little Russia. The power of the hetman, as we were glad before, did not inspire respect among the people. The hetman's policy, oriented towards the wealthy segments of the population (bourgeoisie, landowners, officers and officials), the export of food and raw materials in the interests of the German bloc, repression and terror, caused large-scale popular resistance. The land reform aimed at selling off the landlords' land under state control was not supported by the peasantry. The peasants did not want to pay for what they had already seized.



Resistance detachments multiplied, red partisans, just bandits. The peasant war took on a large-scale character, the authorities did not control individual areas. Talented folk leaders like Makhno came to the fore. Entire rebel small armies appeared. They could not resist the regular Austro-German units, but the occupiers could not control the entire territory. The garrisons occupied cities, important objects, stations and ensured the operation of the railways. The Germans and Austrians had to fight the rebels, and hopes that the Russian Ukraine would provide provisions and raw materials for the warring Central Powers were buried. Of course, the Germans, as best they could, robbed the occupied Western Russian regions, but failed to establish a stable order.

On June 25, 1918, an Austrian diplomat reported to Vienna from Kyiv:

"German, as well as imperial and royal troops, are forced to continuously conduct defensive battles, sometimes associated with significant losses."


Emperor Wilhelm II (left) and Hetman Skoropadsky at a meeting at the Headquarters of the Supreme Command in Spa in August 1918

About "Ukrainian culture"


Skoropadsky himself was a reasonable man. He understood that there was no Ukrainian culture:

“The whole Ukrainian culture was expressed in the fact that a crowd of all sorts of indefinite youth in hats with a kititsa walked around Kyiv; some shaved off their heads, releasing the "settler".

The Ukrainian dictator noted:

“This narrow Ukrainianism is exclusively a product brought to us from Galicia, the culture of which it makes no sense for us to completely transplant: there is no evidence of success and is simply a crime, since there, in fact, there is no culture there. After all, Galicians live leftovers from the German and Polish table. Already one of their languages ​​clearly reflects this, where five words 4 of Polish and German origin.

And further:

“Great Russians and our Ukrainians (under them Skoropadsky meant Russians-Little Russians, bearers of Russian culture - Approx. Aut.) created Russian science, Russian literature, music and art by common efforts, and to give up this of their high and good in order to to take the squalor that the Galicians so naively and kindly offer us, Ukrainians, is simply ridiculous and unthinkable.

The Russian general understood that if the Little Russians abandoned the common Russian culture, from Pushkin and Gogol, then “we (Little Russians-Ukrainians - Approx. Aut.) we will be just a bedding for other nations.”

The hetman realized that in the current situation, Ukraine was doomed, there would be no independent power:

“The Germans were seizing the country more and more evenly. I observed that pedantry and thoughtfulness that was reflected in all their actions. I saw that they would not unite into those cultural strata of society, which we had few in Ukraine, but which were dispersed, while the Germans, who always reckoned with intelligence and strength, would simply, under certain conditions, turn Ukraine into a new Germany. There were already data for that, since, despite the universals that destroyed land ownership, the estates were given to the Germans.

Trying to find a new owner


In the autumn of 1918, when it became clear that Germany was losing, Skoropadsky began to look for allies. In October, he secretly meets with the ataman of the Don Army Krasnov to conclude an alliance and negotiate with the White Guards of the South of Russia.

Ataman recalled: "You, of course, understand that I, the adjutant wing and the general of His Majesty's retinue, cannot be a full-fledged Ukrainian and talk about a free Ukraine." The Hetman speaks of the possibility of an anti-Bolshevik alliance with Denikin, the Don, the Kuban, the Crimea and Georgia. And then says historical phrase: "We are all Russian people, and we need to save Russia, and we can only save it ourselves." The hetman was ready to provide the whites with the rich reserves of the tsarist army that remained in Little Russia: weapon, ammunition, ammunition, etc.

The problem was that there was no united Russia then. There were several centers hostile to each other. There was red Russia with its capital in Moscow and white Russia with its center in the south. There were also various separatists. And the peasants "without a king" generally lived on their own and were not going to obey anyone.

Skoropadsky wanted to unite with White Russia. The basis was common: the capitalists, the bourgeoisie, the landlords, the bureaucracy, a significant part of the officers. Orientation to the West. Hatred for the Bolsheviks. However, white Russia was not united. Denikin focused on the Entente, Krasnov - on Germany. The "flexible" ataman was closer to the hetman than the stubborn Denikin. Krasnov was never able to convince Denikin to make an alliance with the "traitor" Skoropadsky.

At the same time, anticipating the fall of the Second Reich, Skoropadsky worked out all possible lines in the fall. Secretly contacted Ukrainian nationalists led by the former head of the Rada Vynnichenko. It was proposed to assemble a council of various nationalist parties. In essence, to ensure the transfer of power from the hetman to the nationalists.

On November 14, 1918, a few days after the news of the Compiègne truce, Hetman Skoropadsky signed the "Charter" - a manifesto in which he announced that he would defend "the long-standing power and strength of the All-Russian State", and called for the construction of the All-Russian Federation as the first step towards reconstruction of Great Russia. This was the last rate of Skoropadsky. Kyiv was packed with thousands of Russian officers, their mobilization could have saved it. The hetman renounced the separatist, Ukrainianization policy. The Hetmanate “turned white” and began conscripting Colonel Svyatopolk-Mirsky and General Kirpichev to volunteer squads. The officers decorated the left sleeve of their greatcoats with a tricolor white-blue-red chevron, as in Denikin's army. It was the only combat-ready contingent of the "Ukrainian State" army.

However, Skoropadsky was late. On the night of November 14, 1918, the former leaders of the Central Rada, headed by Vinnichenko, formed the Directory of the Ukrainian People's Republic (UNR), which began an armed struggle for power. Leaving Belaya Tserkov on November 18, 1918, Petliura's army marched on Kyiv not under yellow and blue, but under red banners. The Petliurists were no longer in favor of "independence", but against the bourgeoisie and the "Akhvitzers". Vinnichenko and Petliura fought for power and wanted to get massive support from the people, the peasants, who hated the bourgeoisie. It is interesting that the Bolsheviks at that moment supported the Petliurists in order to topple the Hetmanate. On December 14, the troops of the Directory occupied Kyiv.

Skoropadsky fled in a German convoy. Lived in Germany as a private person, received a pension. He did not cooperate with the Nazis, he died in April 1945 during the Anglo-American bombing.
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +17
    29 March 2023 06: 19
    “This narrow Ukrainianism is exclusively a product brought to us from Galicia, the culture of which it makes no sense for us to completely transplant: there is no evidence of success and is simply a crime, since there, in fact, there is no culture there. After all, the Galicians live on leftovers from the German and Polish table ... "
    Here, the whole essence of what is happening in Ukraine now is in this phrase, and there is nothing to add!
    1. +10
      29 March 2023 09: 20
      Quite the same with Galicia. For the sake of the idea of ​​national sentimentalism, it is clearly unprofitable for us to attach to our homeland a region that has lost any living connection with it. After all, for an insignificant handful of Russians in the spirit of the Galicians, how many Poles, Jews, Ukrainianized Uniates will we get? The so-called Ukrainian or Mazepa movement is not scary for us now, but we should not let it grow, increasing the number of restless Ukrainian elements, since in this movement there is an undeniable germ of extremely dangerous Little Russian separatism, which, under favorable conditions, can reach completely unexpected proportions.

      Note by Pyotr Nikolaevich Durnovo to Emperor Nicholas II
      1. +3
        29 March 2023 10: 30
        Quote: paul3390
        It is clearly unprofitable for us, in the name of the idea of ​​national sentimentalism, to annex to our fatherland a region that has lost all living connection with it. After all, for an insignificant handful of Russian Galicians in spirit, how many Poles, Jews, Ukrainianized Uniates will we get?

        I think this is true for today as well...
      2. BAI
        +3
        29 March 2023 14: 23
        The task that the West puts before the “Ukrainians” is well known: to throw Rus' under the feet of the Vatican, to trample on the thousand-year-old Russian civilization. And having broken the Russian civilization through the knee, to get free access to the exploitation of the natural and human resources of Rus', overthrowing it to overseas colonies with the next Creoles. There should be no mercy for the “Ukrainians”, who have been brought up as staunch opponents of everything Russian. Only physical destruction. History will forgive us this, because the survival and historicity of the entire Russian people depend on the speed and determination of our actions ... "

        © Alexy Yulianovich Gerovsky, Rusyn politician.

        From Gerovsky's letter to Stalin.
        So that there would be no rumors under the "Ukrainians" Gerovsky assumed only "Svidomo" Galicians.
      3. 0
        29 March 2023 17: 20
        Quote: paul3390
        [i]Absolutely the same with respect to Galicia. It is clearly unprofitable for us, in the name of the idea of ​​national sentimentalism, to annex to our fatherland a region that has lost all living connection with it.
        Note by Pyotr Nikolaevich Durnovo to Emperor Nicholas II


        I imagine the Anglo-Saxons who would have decided to leave India in the 19th century, because "they don't like us there and there is no connection"..... Here it is, the slavish essence of all sorts of "Durnovo" out there - justified the scoundrel, his last name. Wow, and we still have a lot of them in Russia!
        1. +2
          April 3 2023 11: 26
          India for the British was a COLONY, none of the British would have wished for it to join the fatherland with the equalization of the rights of local residents and LORD)))
    2. 0
      29 March 2023 17: 25
      Quote from Arifon
      “This narrow Ukrainianism is exclusively a product brought to us from Galicia, the culture of which it makes no sense for us to completely transplant: there is no evidence of success and is simply a crime, since there, in fact, there is no culture there. After all, the Galicians live on leftovers from the German and Polish table ... "
      Here, the whole essence of what is happening in Ukraine now is in this phrase, and there is nothing to add!

      The whole point is elsewhere. Some forced the Galicians to eat leftovers from their table, while others are afraid to set foot where "we are not loved." If the Anglo-Saxons or Stalin were guided by these thoughts, they would not have achieved a damn thing.
  2. +7
    29 March 2023 07: 27
    In early February 1918, the UNR signed a separate peace with the Germans, in March Russia recognized the independence of the UNR and signed the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk. In April, Skoropadsky makes a coup d'état and the UNR is liquidated with the support of Germany.

    Skoropadsky was always a German litter as long as the Germans were in power. So that he would not sentence at the same time. Words are one thing, deeds are another.

    And what is "white Russia in the South"? Yes, the same as in the East and in the North. In December 1917, a conference of the Entente countries meets in Paris, which divides Russia into ZONES of responsibility. And allocates funding to governments and future armies created to fight the one and only--
    The real Russia is the RSFSR.
    There has always been only one real Russia.
    1. +1
      29 March 2023 08: 04
      Quote: ivan2022
      There has always been only one real Russia.

      They said strongly, but it’s not entirely clear - the RSFSR, or what?
      Quote: ivan2022
      In April, Skoropadsky makes a coup d'état and the UNR is liquidated with the support of Germany

      This most notorious UNR was, sorry for the expression, sucked out of your finger, like the no less notorious Rada itself, the circus was organized bloody, for this reason, it is inappropriate to blame Skoropadsky for seizing power - whoever took it first gets the slippers.
      Skoropadsky understood well that it was impossible to build any Ukrainian statehood in isolation from Russia.
      A hundred years have passed, and we are now seeing it with our own eyes.
      1. -1
        29 March 2023 10: 13
        Quote: bober1982
        Quote: ivan2022
        There has always been only one real Russia.

        They said strongly, but it’s not entirely clear - the RSFSR, or what?
        .

        It may be strong, but "many Russias" are even stronger. In your opinion, it means that there were a lot of Russia ... By the way - the current RF is the legal successor of both the USSR and the same "RSFSR or something." Again, it's not clear, is it?
    2. 0
      7 September 2023 08: 51
      - Skoropadsky has always been a German litter,
      And who then was not a German litter?
      The Bolsheviks signed a humiliating treaty, Georgia literally fell under the Germans. The Germanophiles, besides Krasnov, were Shkuro and Kornilov.
      Skorpadsky did not want a civil war in Ukraine and relinquished power.
      By the way, according to Kerensky and Co., Skoropadsky’s Ukrainian corps was the most combat-ready unit of the Russian army.
      And as the author pointed out, the last hetman of Ukraine did not cooperate with the Nazis!
      Interestingly, the general left memoirs, but the St. Petersburg journalist Petliura did not.
      “I love the Russian language, the Ukrainians can’t stand it; at least they pretend that they don’t love it; I love middle Russia, the Moscow region - they find this country disgusting; I believe in the great future of Russia, if only it will rebuild itself on a new basis, where all parts of it would have the same voice in resolving issues and where it would not be like now, for example, when in Moscow in certain circles they look at Ukraine as an owner looks at an employee; Ukrainians do not believe in this future, etc. etc., etc. There is not a single point on which I would agree with them on these questions.

      ...For me, the attitude of Great Russian circles towards my undertakings is clear: they did not want Ukraine and thought that they could completely return to the old ways, but I wanted a Ukraine that was not hostile to Great Russia, but fraternal, where all Ukrainian aspirations would find a way out. Then, in fact, this hatred of Russia artificially incited by the Galicians would have no basis and would eventually disappear altogether.
      Then, among them there are many narrow fanatics, especially in the sense of professing the idea of ​​​​hatred towards Russia. It was these kind of Galicians who were the best agitators sent to us by the Austrians. It doesn’t matter to them that Ukraine will suffocate without Great Russia, that its industry will never develop, that it will be entirely in the hands of foreigners, that the role of their Ukraine is to be populated by some kind of vegetating peasantry.
      Here, by the way, this hatred is kindled by Uniate priests!!!
  3. +9
    29 March 2023 08: 35
    Skoropadsky is an ordinary shifter. An ardent monarchist under the Tsar, in February 1917 he quickly turned his skin into an anti-monarchist. And without the monarchy - on the way to split Russia! This is where it started. It was Skoropadsky who was in a hurry to dismiss Russian officers and put ethnic ones from Western Ukraine in their place, especially with the "correct" surnames. Skoropadsky himself could not say a few words in Ukrainian, but he appointed the Ukrainian language the only state language in Ukraine. Here are just two of these things - he expelled Russian officers and forbade the Russian language to be the state language, only these two things already show that such an installation was from the German General Staff in order to achieve the maximum rejection of Ukraine from Russia. And then everything is according to Bulgakov, about this Skoropadsky and about this Ukraine of that time ...
    Moreover, the former ardent Russian monarchist, who turned his skin into an ardent Russian anti-monarchist Skoropadsky, appointed for himself the title of His Serene Highness the Clearly Noble Pan Hetman of All Ukraine!
    Why, many monarchs around the world from such a "title" with envy nervously lit a modest cigarette in the corner ... !!!
    1. +2
      29 March 2023 10: 55
      YOU are right in describing Skoropadsky and his * achievements *. It is a pity that not everyone strives to follow historical events.
      1. +2
        29 March 2023 11: 41
        The article is an attempt to whitewash Skoropadsky. Of course, he is a scoundrel, but not quite. He has "correct" thoughts. This is a typical Judas.
    2. +1
      29 March 2023 12: 48
      Quote: north 2
      And then everything is according to Bulgakov, about this Skoropadsky and about this Ukraine of that time

      And, here I agree, everything is correct, no academic research is needed, just re-read White guardBulgakov, of course, was semi-crazy, but he assessed the picture of the battle very accurately.
      1. +4
        29 March 2023 15: 12
        , Bulgakov, of course, was semi-crazy

        Of course, any genius, in the eyes of an average-level individual, looks quite crazy to himself. This has always been the case for all peoples. hi
        1. +2
          29 March 2023 22: 31
          Once upon a time in my teens I thought: who is a genius?

          He gave something like this: Who sees what others do not see.
    3. +1
      29 March 2023 12: 54
      Quote: north 2
      Skoropadsky himself could not say a few words in Ukrainian

      By the way, the star of the ground troops - Syrsky, either a native of Ryazan or Bryansk, also cannot speak the language, his subordinates make fun of him.
      For the curious: Thalberg, white guardI, Bulgakov - Mikhail Afanasyevich makes fun of Talberg, and others like him (Syrsky).
      1. +2
        29 March 2023 16: 07
        Alexander Stanislavovich Syrsky (Ukrainian. Oleksandr Stanislavovich Sirsky; born July 26, 1965, Novinki, Vladimir region) - Ukrainian military leader. Commander of the Ground Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine since August 5, 2019, Colonel General (2020). Hero of Ukraine (2022).


        Content
        1 Biography
        2 Military ranks
        3 Awards
        4 Personal life
        5 Notes
        Biography
        Born on July 26, 1965[2] in the village of Novinki, Vladimir Region[1][3].

        Graduated from the Moscow Higher All-Arms Command School. He began his service in 1986 as a commander of a motorized rifle platoon.
        1. +4
          29 March 2023 18: 51
          Quote: Vik66
          He began his service in 1986 as a commander of a motorized rifle platoon.

          Grated kalach, it’s interesting - at what course Sirsky joined the CPSU, he wrote a lot of notes on Marxist-Leninist training, wiped his pants at party meetings, and bawled agitation.
          Some sometimes, naively, ask where the Army was when the Union was smashed - and, there it was, where the Syrian was, there were more such legions.
          1. +1
            30 March 2023 00: 49
            Quote: bober1982
            Quote: Vik66
            He began his service in 1986 as a commander of a motorized rifle platoon.

            Grated kalach, it’s interesting - at what course Sirsky joined the CPSU, he wrote a lot of notes on Marxist-Leninist training, wiped his pants at party meetings, and bawled agitation.
            Some sometimes, naively, ask where the Army was when the Union was smashed - and, there it was, where the Syrian was, there were more such legions.

            Controversial opinion. Personally, I have been in the military since 1980. I did not join the CPSU, the notes were really copied from each other purely mechanically. Until now, these notebooks lie! Nostalgia.
          2. 0
            23 May 2023 14: 17
            Quote: bober1982
            , wrote down a lot of notes on Marxist-Leninist training,

            Abstracts were forced to write in order to develop obedience to the authorities. It can be seen that Syrsky diligently wrote notes, since he changed his Russian origin to the career of a Ukrainian punisher.
  4. +3
    29 March 2023 11: 17
    However, white Russia was not united. Denikin focused on the Entente, Krasnov - on Germany.

    This was the least of the contradictions between Krasnov and Denikin. smile
    The main thing was that Krasnov stood for the independent army of the Don and the Don-Caucasian Union from the Don to the Volga - for which, in fact, he lay down under the Germans.
    To ask Your Imperial Majesty to recognize the borders of the Great Don Army on its former geographical and ethnographic dimensions, to help resolve the dispute between Ukraine and the Don Army over Taganrog and its districts in favor of the Don Army, which owns the Taganrog District for more than 500 years and for which the Taganrog District is part of Tmutarakan, from which the Don Army became.
    To ask Your Majesty to facilitate the accession to the army for strategic reasons of the cities of Kamyshin and Tsaritsyn of the Saratov province and the city of Voronezh, the station of Liski and Povorino and draw the borders of the Donskoy army, as indicated on the map available in the Winter Village

    Well, Denikin spoke for single and indivisible - on the basis of which he entered into conflicts with both Krasnov and the Entente. Suffice it to recall how the British threatened to excommunicate Denikin from supplies - after he began to clear the Russian territories of the Caucasian coast of the World Cup occupied by Georgia by military force.
    1. 0
      23 May 2023 14: 20
      Quote: Alexey RA
      Suffice it to recall how the British threatened to excommunicate Denikin from supplies - after he began to clear the Russian territories of the Caucasian coast of the World Cup occupied by Georgia by military force.

      Further threats it came. Moreover, Denikin was not even threatened, but given political recommendations and warned of the consequences for their poor implementation.
  5. +1
    29 March 2023 13: 48
    Good afternoon!
    It is not surprising that Skoropadsky first supported Russia, then Germany: this is the principle of "we fight on the side of the strong." And this principle has been repeatedly used and has been used in practice since time immemorial.
    The essence of the principle is as follows: there is a conflict, one side is stronger, and you are on its side.
    And if the other side suddenly became stronger, then you go to support it. Not to be crushed by the winner. Therefore, this principle is still active.
    Thank you for the article! Have a nice day everyone!
    1. +1
      29 March 2023 15: 46
      Quote from Kojote21
      It is not surprising that Skoropadsky first supported Russia, then Germany: this is the principle of "we fight on the side of the strong." And this principle has been repeatedly used and has been used in practice since time immemorial.

      Here, the main thing is not to miss the choice of the strong. And it will be like with Georgia during the Civil. First, the Georgians fell under the Germans, then under the British. And everything seemed to work at first - the limes even reined in Denikin, who was trying to take away the Russian lands they had captured from the Georgians. But when the Reds came and the Georgians, out of habit, rushed to the British - they suddenly declared that they could not help in any way - negotiate yourself. smile
      1. +1
        29 March 2023 16: 28
        As for the choice of the strong - it's as lucky. But some were lucky: Romania and Bulgaria supported the Third Reich in World War II, and when Soviet troops entered their territory, they went over to their side. And compared to Germany and Italy, they got off much cheaper - they did not pay reparations, and no restrictions were imposed on the Armed Forces.
        And yes, how lucky
        After all, it happens - no luck,
        Well, this is how it works.
        1. +1
          April 1 2023 19: 25
          "Gypsies" are generally a separate song, in the 1st World War they first threw the Germans with whom they were in allied relations, entered into an alliance with the Entente, but they were in no hurry to get involved in the war (however, no one really insisted, knowing the fighting qualities of the armed forces of the "camps leaving into the sky"), while they managed to trade in grain with the Germans and Austrians; as a result, in 1916, during the Brusilov breakthrough, they nevertheless decided that their finest hour had come and declared war on Germany, as a result, their front was held at the expense of the Russian troops, they were still forced to conclude an enslaving peace with the Germans, along the way "thanking" the already revolutionary Russia by tearing away Bessarabia, and yet they managed to re-declare war on Germany a few hours before the armistice.
    2. 0
      April 3 2023 13: 08
      Quote from Kojote21
      No wonder Skoropadsky initially supported Russia

      It is when ? When did you support Denikin? Yeah ... And Denikin "supported" the Entente. And safely screwed in the USA ...
      1. 0
        23 May 2023 14: 27
        Quote: ort
        And Denikin "supported" the Entente. And safely screwed in the USA ...

        Denikin lived in France until 1945. He fled to the USA fearing deportation to the USSR. At the end of 1944 and into 1945, the MGB had a strong position in France and throughout Europe. But by 1948, Stalin, Beria and Abakumov lost everything by becoming Dulles’ agents of influence and organizing a “witch hunt” at the suggestion of Allen Dulles in the USSR (the Leningrad case, the fight against genetics, the chemical theory of resonance, idealism in physics) and Europe (the Kostov case in NRB, Slansky in Czechoslovakia, Gomulka in Poland) during the operation of the department of active operations "Operation split".
        1. -1
          28 May 2023 19: 14
          About the fact that Beria simultaneously created the atomic project and was an agent of Dulles and Vralles - tell us in kindergarten. And not everyone will believe you.

          And the fact that in 1947 the Americans buried Denikin with honors, as the commander-in-chief of the army allied with the United States, is a historical fact.
  6. 0
    13 May 2023 16: 31
    Whom to write about history is definitely not military propagandists, there are excellent St. Petersburg historians, Yegor Yakovlev, Kirill Nazarenko, Klim Zhukov, etc., read, listen, look, after them everything else will seem to you garbage and nonsense ..