Moscow and Minsk agreed to place Russian tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of Belarus

136
Moscow and Minsk agreed to place Russian tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of Belarus

Russia will deploy a tactical nuclear weapon on the territory of Belarus weapon, the construction of storage facilities for it is already being completed. In addition, Minsk received the Iskander-M operational-tactical missile system, capable of using missiles with nuclear warheads. Vladimir Putin spoke about this on the air of the Rossiya-24 TV channel.

Russia will place its tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of Belarus, Moscow and Minsk have already agreed on this. At the same time, there will be no violation of the START Treaty by the Russian side, we do not transfer tactical nuclear weapons, but place them on the territory of a country allied to us. That is, we are doing everything that the United States has been doing for decades, placing its nuclear weapons on the territory of European countries.



We do not transfer. And the United States does not pass it on to its allies. We basically do everything they did for a decade. They have allies in certain countries and their carriers are trained, and their crews are trained. We are going to do the same. This is exactly what Alexander Grigorievich asked for.

- said the Russian leader.

According to Putin, today Belarus has received the Iskander OTRK, capable of using nuclear weapons, and by July 1, the construction of a special storage facility on Belarusian territory, where Russian tactical weapons will be placed, is being completed. In addition, Russia helped Belarus to convert aircraft for the use of nuclear weapons.

We have already handed over to Belarus our well-known, very effective Iskander complex, it can also be a carrier. From April 3, we start training the crew and on July 1 we finish the construction of a special storage facility for tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of Belarus

- added the Russian president.
136 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Maz
    +42
    25 March 2023 21: 18
    Fire, not news. And rightly so, it’s high time!!! Oh, now the howling and gnashing will begin?!

    Statements by V.V. Putin:

    - arsonists plan to send more than 400 tanks to Ukraine, during this time we will produce over 1600 new tanks, the total number of tanks of the Russian army will be more than 3 times the number of tanks of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

    - On July 1, we complete the construction of a storage facility for tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus

    - Britain's statement was the reason for negotiations with Lukashenka, but Minsk has long been asking to place Russian tactical nuclear weapons with them

    - we have already helped the Belarusians re-equipped aircraft, 10 types of aircraft are ready for the use of tactical weapons, we handed over the Iskander, from April 3 we start training crews, we start building a storage facility for nuclear weapons

    - we are not transferring our tactical nuclear weapons to Belarus, but we will deploy them and train the military, like the United States in Europe

    Tactical weapons in Belarus reduce the likelihood of Poland entering the West of Ukraine and enhance the security of Belarus itself, our brothers and allies. It is also an important signal to the West that Russia can use its tactical nuclear weapons to supply uranium ammunition.

    Putin: I fully agree with the conclusions that the Nord Stream explosions are the work of the US intelligence services

    Putin: Russia does not encroach on the dollar, we would use it, but they do not give us
    1. +24
      25 March 2023 21: 23
      The British cobra charmer apparently will have enuresis today, and the American grandfather will generally fall into prostration and do not disturb him for a week. A strong move on the US nuclear weapons in Europe, as they say, what you fight for is what you get.
      1. +5
        26 March 2023 00: 12
        Such news was expected to be heard in 2014, along with the entry of Russian troops to the outskirts, which people with posters were waiting for.
        A very long process is underway, the vector of getting out of the influence of foreign elites, our officials. This process will end with the departure of officials from the prayer place, as a result, the birth rate in Rus' will increase and things will "go uphill."
        Chinese officials less than a hundred years ago gave the monks and "ordinary people" their forbidden city, and things went uphill. However, as in Rus' under Peter1, who removed the boyar officials from the Kremlin, a great empire was built, on the fragments of which we live.
    2. +41
      25 March 2023 21: 30
      So if we do not transfer nuclear weapons to Belarus, but place them, then this is also possible in Iran. And not only. am
      1. +7
        25 March 2023 22: 17
        Yes, the message has been made, now let them scratch their turnips ... however, they also have problems with turnips.
      2. +3
        26 March 2023 10: 09
        Quote from Pharmacist
        So if we do not transfer nuclear weapons to Belarus, but place them, then this is also possible in Iran. And not only.

        And in Cuba. Yes
        And in Venezuela. Yes
        And in Nicaragua. Yes
        And if Mexico asks ... feel let's think.
    3. Maz
      +6
      25 March 2023 21: 39
      Putin about depleted uranium: Russia has something to answer, we have hundreds of thousands of such shells
      1. +2
        25 March 2023 21: 45
        The most important thing is NATO with its spell, Russia, just try to use TNAS in Ukraine, we will arrange it for you!
      2. +4
        25 March 2023 21: 45
        Do you consider this Britain's answer to hit their territories with such shells? After all, Zaporozhye, and Kherson, and .... as if our territories.
        1. +6
          25 March 2023 22: 01
          To hit in the Zaporozhye and Kherson regions, Belarus is not the best location for tactical nuclear weapons. Here the geography is different.
        2. KCA
          -3
          25 March 2023 22: 17
          After the use of tactical nuclear weapons, which, both Tactical nuclear weapons and Thermonuclear nuclear weapons, practically does not remain contaminated, oats are now expensive, the fuel burns out in full, not like in the 40s
      3. +12
        25 March 2023 22: 12
        The bad thing with these shells is that they will be used on Russian territory. Here in Polish, German, Anglo-Saxon, I am FOR it with all hands and feet!
        1. +2
          25 March 2023 22: 18
          The half-life of uranium ammunition is billions of years. This is the worst version of a dirty nuclear bomb. But after the use of a neutron or hydrogen bomb, in a month the territory becomes safe.
        2. +3
          26 March 2023 00: 16
          It seems to me that the idea is not in application, but in creating conditions for the future symmetrical failure Russia and the US from deploying their nuclear weapons outside their territory in Europe.
          The situation is reminiscent of the Caribbean crisis in the phase of its aggravation.
      4. +2
        25 March 2023 22: 58
        Quote: Maz
        Russia has something to answer, we have hundreds of thousands of such shells

        We developed shells with depleted uranium back in the USSR, but they were not mass-produced.
        But we have Poseidons, Calibers, X-102s, Iskanders, etc. with "depleted uranium"
        1. -2
          25 March 2023 23: 37
          I think the Poseidons are already on alert ...

          Nuclear submarine "Belgorod" secretly left two nuclear drones "Poseidon" off the coast of the United States

          14-02-2023, 07:42 | Politics / Weapons and conflicts | posted by: politikanish | comments: (9) | views: (6 518)


          Nuclear submarine "Belgorod" secretly left two nuclear drones "Poseidon" off the coast of the United States
          After returning to her native harbor from the first trip of the Belgorod nuclear submarine, she suddenly “lost weight” by about two hundred tons. This is the conclusion given by American intelligence officers, having studied satellite images of the submarine. In this regard, Pentagon analysts immediately had a version about two Poseidon nuclear drones unloaded by it (based on the fact that the mass of one is about one hundred tons) about one thousand eight hundred kilometers from the US coast. This point was the only place where their intelligence was able to briefly detect a Russian submarine.
      5. +2
        25 March 2023 23: 29
        He was right about the arable land. Such shells are used where they are not going to live, and here it's coming out like no other. There are shells with depleted not only rockets. The same Poles now have something to think about before building up a grouping and threatening to enter Belarus, they will be demolished and quickly.
        1. +1
          26 March 2023 06: 41
          They will not be used. This is a political move and a warning. First of all, logs
      6. +2
        26 March 2023 08: 47
        Putin about depleted uranium: Russia has something to answer, we have hundreds of thousands of such shells

        Only now it is impossible to use them on our territory, which is the outskirts, we will poison everything. If we poison the territory, then it is better not to be depleted, but enriched, the effect is much higher.
    4. +5
      25 March 2023 22: 57
      Quote: Maz
      Fire, not news. And rightly so, it’s high time!!! Oh, now the howling and gnashing will begin?!

      Statements by V.V. Putin:

      - arsonists plan to send more than 400 tanks to Ukraine, during this time we will produce over 1600 new tanks, the total number of tanks of the Russian army will be more than 3 times the number of tanks of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

      - On July 1, we complete the construction of a storage facility for tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus

      - Britain's statement was the reason for negotiations with Lukashenka, but Minsk has long been asking to place Russian tactical nuclear weapons with them

      - we have already helped the Belarusians re-equipped aircraft, 10 types of aircraft are ready for the use of tactical weapons, we handed over the Iskander, from April 3 we start training crews, we start building a storage facility for nuclear weapons

      - we are not transferring our tactical nuclear weapons to Belarus, but we will deploy them and train the military, like the United States in Europe

      Tactical weapons in Belarus reduce the likelihood of Poland entering the West of Ukraine and enhance the security of Belarus itself, our brothers and allies. It is also an important signal to the West that Russia can use its tactical nuclear weapons to supply uranium ammunition.

      Putin: I fully agree with the conclusions that the Nord Stream explosions are the work of the US intelligence services

      Putin: Russia does not encroach on the dollar, we would use it, but they do not give us

      It was, mindless Anglo-Saxons, a simple message from Russia: give written security guarantees.
      And, after all, Russia has not only not yet waved its main baton, but has not yet raised No.
      1. +6
        25 March 2023 23: 43
        And what would these "written guarantees" give? Again it would be whining that we were deceived?
        1. +1
          26 March 2023 06: 43
          Paper is now worth nothing (in the military-political sense) The price is strength and determination
    5. 0
      26 March 2023 01: 43

      Maz
      Yesterday, 21: 18
      NEW
      +28
      Fire, not news. And rightly so, it’s high time!!! Oh, now the howling and gnashing will begin?! @. from all euro-irons and garbage dumps! ..
      I agree completely! good
      Statements by V.V. Putin:

      - arsonists plan to send more than 400 tanks to Ukraine, during this time we will produce over 1600 new tanks, the total number of tanks of the Russian army will be more than 3 times the number of tanks of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
      In continuation - about 5 thousand shells PER DAY are spent in unnecessary. Merikatos produce 15 thousand pieces PER MONTH. wassat
    6. Maz
      0
      26 March 2023 05: 43
      A million shells for Ukraine is a lot, but in the leading NATO countries 14-15 thousand shells are produced monthly, and the Ukrainian Armed Forces use up to 5 thousand shells per day - Putin ....! The Russian defense sector is also developing very rapidly and will produce in three times more ammunition than West can supply to Ukraine - Putin
    7. LMN
      -7
      26 March 2023 05: 51
      How much do you get?
      How many silver coins did you get?
  2. +10
    25 March 2023 21: 21
    Vooooot why was there a build-up of a united group in Belarus! And everyone assumed that for a strike on Ukraine from this direction ... a very correct step. In general, it is possible to build more airfields and missile sites.
    1. +8
      25 March 2023 23: 37
      Quote from monetam
      Vooooot why was there a build-up of a united group in Belarus!

      This intention is not against Sumeria, but a response to the west, especially to some in Poland... I deliberately write the names of countries (or regions) in small letters as a sign of my "respect" for them. We (Belarus) voluntarily renounced the possession of nuclear weapons at one time, again as a sign of our good intentions. But in Germany, the Yankees continue to keep their nuclear weapons. draw conclusions, gentlemen, liberals ... For me, it’s time to get hold of a big club for a long time. especially in my place at one time the Mozyr division of the Strategic Missile Forces was located. Until now, there are shelters for the "Pioneers" nearby ...
      1. +3
        25 March 2023 23: 49
        father served on the RSD-10 hi how upset he was when they were drank in the "saints" of the 90s
  3. +17
    25 March 2023 21: 22
    The Poles are now on their hind legs. They obviously didn't expect this.
    1. +26
      25 March 2023 21: 28
      The next platform for placement is Iran, the Jews are simply delighted with a standing ovation.
      1. +1
        25 March 2023 21: 48
        Quote from Silver99
        The next place to place is Iran

        And Syria is not in favor???
        1. +7
          25 March 2023 22: 07
          Syria is partially captured by terrorists; there is no order, no control, no stability, there was still not enough to get to the terrorists.
          1. +6
            25 March 2023 22: 58
            Quote: Incvizitor
            Syria is partially captured by terrorists; there is no order, no control, no stability, there was still not enough to get to the terrorists.

            And Syria needs to be cleaned, winked but, after the Baltic states and Poland.
          2. +2
            26 March 2023 00: 26
            Quote: Incvizitor
            Syria is partially captured by terrorists; there is no order, no control, no stability, there was still not enough to get to the terrorists.

            But in Syria, on a legal basis, there is our base on which you can keep our "toys" without transferring them to the wrong hands. hi
      2. 0
        26 March 2023 01: 56
        Silver99
        Yesterday, 21: 28
        NEW

        +22
        The next platform for placement is Iran, the Jews are simply delighted with a standing ovation.
        Now they, "Jews", with joy)) laughing break down their wall with their heads. wink
      3. +5
        26 March 2023 02: 06
        And these missiles in Belarus are not directed against NATO countries!
        This is to protect against the threat from Pakistan!
        And still place in Cuba, to protect against Guinea-Bessau.
    2. +8
      25 March 2023 21: 35
      They expected it, but thought it was fantastic. Dreams come true, now we get them from two directions.
    3. +3
      25 March 2023 21: 36
      Get on your knees is now called:
      Quote from kromer
      The Poles are now on their hind legs.
      1. +8
        25 March 2023 21: 50
        Quote from kromer
        The Poles are now on their hind legs

        Get on your knees now that's what it's called

    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. 0
      26 March 2023 12: 36
      In general, as far as I remember, the nuclear weapons storage facility has been in the Kaliningrad region for a long time.
  4. +8
    25 March 2023 21: 23
    For Iskander-K, Caliber can be adapted and there will be a range of 2500 kilometers.
    1. +1
      26 March 2023 08: 51
      Iskander-K is intercepted much easier than the basic version, it will not work for Europe, the air defense is too saturated.
  5. -31
    25 March 2023 21: 24
    Yeah.

    Well, now we are waiting for the deployment of nuclear weapons on the territory of the Baltic States and Poland in response?
    1. +24
      25 March 2023 21: 30
      Quote from: dump22
      Yeah.

      Well, now we are waiting for the deployment of nuclear weapons on the territory of the Baltic States and Poland in response?

      Do you think it would not appear there over time? Living with wolves...
      1. -12
        25 March 2023 22: 49
        Do you think it would not appear there over time?


        Yes, it could very well have.
        Only this would be a violation of the Russia-NATO Act of 1997 on their part.
        And we would respond immediately by deploying our nuclear weapons, and we would rightfully say that we were not the first to start a nuclear confrontation. And now it turns out that we were the first to violate that treaty.

        And the main thing is not clear, but what do we want to achieve with this?
        To scare the Poles and the Baltic states, and indeed all of Eastern Europe?
        Yes, we will certainly scare them with this. Very.
        And with great fear they will ask NATO to host nuclear weapons.
        And this means that our goal was exactly what we were striving for - to get the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons so close to our borders as soon as possible?
        Yes, we started the NWO in order to increase the security of Russia!
        And what do we have in a year, what increase in security?
        Finland joins NATO, we are waiting for the deployment of nuclear weapons at our borders.
        And I have a question - but is everything going "according to plan" ?!
        1. +1
          25 March 2023 23: 03
          Quote from: dump22
          Only this would be a violation of the Russia-NATO Act of 1997 on their part.
          So they now live not according to agreements, but according to the world order based on the "rules" written by themselves.
          And, it turns out you didn’t know!? belay

          Quote from: dump22
          And I have a question - but is everything going "according to plan" ?!
          Do you, I don't know request and, in the Russian Federation - everything is according to plan! Yes
          1. -4
            25 March 2023 23: 13
            I envy you. So you believe that this step will lead to an increase in Russia's security. That everything was originally planned so that everything goes according to plan.
            I would love to believe that too.
            But something doesn't work.
        2. +10
          25 March 2023 23: 38
          To scare the Poles and the Baltic states, and indeed all of Eastern Europe?
          Yes, we will certainly scare them with this. Very.
          And with great fear they will ask NATO to host nuclear weapons.

          you are behind the times, Poland asked them to place nuclear weapons a year ago,
          and the Poles are building a US missile defense position area, with launchers capable of launching tomahawks from a nuclear warhead, and all the protests of Russia, the USA and Poland did not care,

          so now there is just a response to these NATO actions
          1. +3
            26 March 2023 02: 18
            Even here, everyone seems to have forgotten that in the Kaliningrad region we had a battery of the same Iskanders long before the NWO. And for Poland and the Baltics, all this is not particularly important. It makes sense to discuss the news in terms of creating a precedent, they say, but we can place it in Cuba.
          2. 0
            26 March 2023 17: 52
            Poland asked to host nuclear weapons a year ago


            And how, then placed? Or is it still not?

            now there is just a response to these actions of NATO


            Yes, everything is clear.
            Answer in answer in answer in answer in answer....and so on ad infinitum.
            This is what is called an arms race.
            And we've been through this before.

            So you tell me, only please, if you can be honest: do you really believe that now everything is going according to plan? And most importantly, is everything going exactly according to OUR plan, and not the plan of our former "partners"?
        3. +2
          26 March 2023 01: 32
          dump22 Yes, it seems that we did not violate that agreement, because. did not sign not to place nuclear weapons on the territory of other countries. It was they who signed up not to place new NATO members on the territory.
          As for the rest, yes, everything is somehow through the ass: instead of denazification - nazification in fact, Russophobia is just rushing around, enemies multiply like mushrooms after rain. Now also Ukraine (in terms of territory) will have to be restored for 20 years without solving the pressing problems of "mainland" Russia. We stuck capitally, under the "strict guidance" of our "effective managers". As Strelkov rightly noted, "this government is not capable of anything good." As usual, all hope is in the courage and resilience of our people.
        4. 0
          26 March 2023 12: 38
          Only this would be a violation of the Russia-NATO Act of 1997 on their part.

          Firstly, the Act is not a contract, it is still an Act. It does not contain specific contractual provisions. Only statements. And on the other hand, they themselves wiped themselves a long time ago with this act. They openly say that they are waging a common war against us. What else to worry about - about the act ..
          And with great fear they will ask NATO to host nuclear weapons.

          Yes, like a long time ago. Poland has already stated that it is ready to host American nuclear weapons.
        5. +1
          26 March 2023 18: 30
          Quote from: dump22
          Only this would be a violation of the Russia-NATO Act of 1997 on their part.
          And we would respond instantly by deploying our nuclear weapons, and we would rightfully say that we were not the first to start a nuclear confrontation.

          Do you want to say that there are no nuclear weapons in Germany? Or that it has not been in Romanian Deveselu since 2016 either? Do not escalate around what has long become a fact and we, as always, are not the first in this, as you wrote!
    2. +25
      25 March 2023 21: 31
      You were 20 years late with your forecast, in fact there are jump airfields for B-52s carrying nuclear charges in Poland and the Baltic states. This is a legitimate answer, now Cuba can also be pulled into this conversation, little if their debts have been written off.
      1. +1
        25 March 2023 23: 08
        in fact, there are jump airfields for B-52s carrying nuclear charges in Poland and the Baltic states.


        All right. So we have jump airfields in Belarus. Baranovichi, Lida, Machulishchi.
        But earlier they did not have a permanent deployment of nuclear weapons.
        And now it will. And in Belarus and apparently soon in the Baltic states.
      2. +7
        25 March 2023 23: 09
        it is now possible to pull Cuba into this conversation, little if they have written off their debts.

        Cuba will not agree to this. The Russian Federation is not the USSR. We abandoned them, why would they aggravate relations with the States?
      3. -1
        25 March 2023 23: 42
        Cuba is lying, but Venezuela, or even Mexico ... wassat
    3. +4
      25 March 2023 21: 32
      It's high time, otherwise the Americans are training NATO pilots to fly with their nuclear bombs. Do we get to the missile defense areas in Poland and Romania from Belarus?
      1. +5
        25 March 2023 22: 02
        Quote: tralflot1832
        Do we get to the missile defense areas in Poland and Romania from Belarus?

        And from the Kaliningrad region, and from the Crimea, Russia, and even from Belarus ... and not only to Poland and Romania.
        1. 0
          26 March 2023 01: 53

          skeptic
          Yesterday, 22: 02
          NEW

          +4
          Quote: tralflot1832
          Do we get to the missile defense areas in Poland and Romania from Belarus?

          And from the Kaliningrad region, and from the Crimea, Russia, and even from Belarus ... and not only to Poland and Romania.

          Additionally, Russia helped Belarus convert aircraft to use nuclear weapons.
          Pay attention to the highlighted, said by V. Putin in the past tense. Those. ALREADY converted. And it pleases - they did it, then they announced it. Not the other way around, as we often do.
      2. +5
        25 March 2023 22: 04
        From the Black Sea (Crimea) to Bucharest, only 480 km.
        TNW in Belarus is against Poland. I'm not sure exactly, but we can probably get to the Czech Republic. This is if the range of Iskander is 500KM. Although the Americans are confident that Iskander has a range of much more than 500KM. I don't know who to believe, but I would be very happy if the US is right and the real range is 600-700 km.
        1. -1
          25 March 2023 22: 11
          The most fun for Eastern Europe, they hoped they definitely wouldn’t get the ICBM, their hope came true. hiAnd what do you think Xi Jinping was aware of back in Moscow?
        2. +3
          25 March 2023 22: 15
          Calibers also flew 300 km before they hit the bandits in Syria.
    4. -2
      25 March 2023 21: 36
      It definitely won’t appear in the Tribaltic - it won’t fit. In Poland .... Well, in Turkey it has already been posted, and in Germany
    5. -2
      25 March 2023 22: 05
      we are waiting for the deployment of nuclear weapons in the Baltics and Poland in response

      Found something to scare. It is better to "clean up" in an outbreak than to rot from any infection that will be spread from the territories of the Baltic States and Poland, where biological laboratories from Ukraine are currently moving. Soon, in the forests of Belovezhskaya Pushcha, a wild boar "accidentally" infected will run to the nearest pig farm. And off we go...
    6. +4
      25 March 2023 23: 57
      N'y en at il pas deja en Allemagne et en Italie? !
      http://www.atlasocio.com/cartes/defense/nucleaire/carte-monde-etats-dotes-arme-nucleaire_atlasocio.png

      "Etats hébergeant des armes nucléaires"
      Et sur d'autres sources il ya Italie, Allemagne, Turquie, Belgique, Pays Bas...

      Aren't they already in Germany and Italy? !


      "States Possessing Nuclear Weapons"
      And according to other sources, there are Italy, Germany, Turkey, Belgium, the Netherlands ...
      1. +4
        26 March 2023 00: 23
        Le problème avec la traduction c'est que "hébergeant" est traduit par "possédant" ...et cela change totalement le sens de ma phrase :-)
        Ceci dit la Russie ne fait qu'appliquer la méthode des USA à savoir placer des bombes atomique chez ses alliés... Et pour être comparable la méthode devrait aussi s'appliquer à la même distance des frontières US...
        Little reminder :
        "Cinq pays européens - la Belgique, l'Italie, l'Allemagne, les Pays-Bas et la Turquie - abritent, selon des experts, quelque 180 de ces engins, sur des bases équipées de chasseurs-bombardiers à double capacité ... "

        The problem with the translation is that "hosting" is translated as "ownership" ... and this completely changes the meaning of my sentence :-)
        At the same time, Russia only applies the US method, namely, placing atomic bombs on its allies ... And to be comparable, the method must also be applied at the same distance from the US borders ...
        small reminder:
        "Five European countries - Belgium, Italy, Germany, the Netherlands and Turkey - deploy, according to experts, about 180 of these aircraft at bases equipped with two-seat fighter-bombers ..."
  6. 0
    25 March 2023 21: 25
    A little more than a year has passed, and now what the Bolsheviks "spoke about" is beginning to come true. From this .... eklmn ... . had to start. And not in Belarus, but in Avdeevka.
    Oh how hard it all goes....
    1. +3
      25 March 2023 23: 24
      ivan2022, and what starts to come true? I don’t think that NATA will put in their pants and stop supplying weapons. The statement about 1600 tanks is also not very clear. If this quantity is delivered only to the SVO zone, then it seems to be normal. True, the timing is unclear.
      Now, if Putin said that now we will rivet killer drones a thousand a day, that would please.
  7. +2
    25 March 2023 21: 26
    It is high time. Let them feel and feel in Europe what it is like when a nuclear club hangs literally over the head
    1. -2
      25 March 2023 21: 53
      So they have something to answer ..., do not underestimate the enemy
  8. +1
    25 March 2023 21: 30
    And the flight time is there, that: to Ukraine, to Poland with the Baltic states <5 minutes ...
    1. +5
      25 March 2023 21: 43
      . And the flight time is there, what: to Ukraine, to Poland with the Baltic states <5 minutes ...

      Less than 1-2 minutes
  9. +2
    25 March 2023 21: 33
    Here the Poles and the Balts are now shaping themselves
    1. +3
      25 March 2023 22: 09
      Quote: Lendrom
      Here the Poles and the Balts are now shaping themselves

      The Sheriff (USA) does not care about the problems of the Indians (Tribalts and Poles).
  10. +3
    25 March 2023 21: 37
    Caribbean Crisis 2 will have its own development option.
  11. +3
    25 March 2023 21: 38
    The shed and the hut burned down. wassat
    British scientists have proven
    U-238 and U-235 the difference is three neutrons, which no one has ever seen live belay In terms of neutrons.
    Phonite is the same
    if you don't rush..
    I am for U-235.
    1. +7
      25 March 2023 22: 02
      Quote: AVA77
      Phonite is the same

      The radioactivity of uranium-235 is ~6,4 times higher than that of uranium-238.
      1. 0
        25 March 2023 22: 13
        And for uranium-238, how many times higher is 13 microroentgen? I don't think it matters
      2. +3
        25 March 2023 22: 16
        You're right!
        Wikipedia says For uranium-235 this figure is 80, for uranium-238 it is only 12,5. kilobecquerel.
        I collected a dosimeter for myself from the Radio magazine, everything is in micro-roentgens.
        I don't understand becquerels.
        1. +1
          25 March 2023 22: 25
          Yes, as for me, Becquerel is clearer. How many decays per second, so many Becquerels. And for x-rays, expressions occur through other physical units. You also need to understand where they come from and what they mean.
          By the way, I found information that the radioactivity of a banana is on average 19 Becquerels.
          1. 0
            25 March 2023 22: 44
            Yes mkr. pretty much the same. This is the number of pulses on the sensor per minute. 10-30 is a natural background.
            Setting up the device is not difficult.
        2. -1
          26 March 2023 08: 52
          If it comes to that, tell me how it will help you. I believe that this knowledge is necessary for the correct dosage of Iodine. Is there a first aid kit? Just do not believe the instructions, you will immediately become disabled. The instructions from the old AI-1 first-aid kits are correct, then the Americans corrected it - to be sure, the defeat of the population, probably.
    2. +2
      25 March 2023 22: 23
      Well, in vain. neutrons have an important function, they allow 2m or more protons to be nearby and not "fall apart". Obviously, the more neutrons, the more protons can be nearby. But we still do not know why Uranium-239 is not obtained, or rather why it has a PPR of several minutes, and not trillions of years. In a word, uranium 238 itself is safe. But he constantly turns into something else, which is no longer so safe. Well, do not forget that uranium is very chemically active. Freely oxidized and already at +30 degrees actively reacts with iron.
      1. +1
        25 March 2023 23: 18
        + You purely for information. and thanks. hi
  12. +5
    25 March 2023 21: 43
    The stakes are rising! Strong decision!
  13. +4
    25 March 2023 21: 46
    This is what I agree with him 100%.
  14. +13
    25 March 2023 21: 49
    Well, what can I say .. rates are rising.
  15. ASM
    0
    25 March 2023 21: 51
    Finally. This should have been done a long time ago. Now, especially with the supply of shells with depleted uranium by the shitty Banderaites, the time for our rocket to reach the tunnels will be reduced. Only civilians need to be warned 3 months in advance to leave the assigned territories, and that tactical Yao can then be used. Unfortunately, the tunnel will not work to plant geraniums.
  16. 0
    25 March 2023 21: 52
    It would be nice to have nuclear weapons to Iran and North Korea.
    1. +2
      26 March 2023 03: 11
      North Korea, as it were, already has its own nuclear weapons
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. +4
    25 March 2023 21: 58
    For the fact that the Europeans fought with their bare backs and ran into ... And I thought why Lukashenka proudly looks into the distance ... Spit on the Poles ... from above ... That's what it is !! Well done .... If, that Poland is a Kabzdets in the full sense of the word ... The Polish honored
    brothers Slavs ... .. The old woman did not suffer for a long time in high-voltage wires ... Khe, khe ... Yes, and it’s time for the Svidobandero-Zhidoukras to wind the settlers around their ears and collect belongings for residence on the Yamal Peninsula .... there will be enough space for all of them .. .. the peninsula is not small ..
  19. -6
    25 March 2023 22: 00
    Will it fly to Lviv?
    How is it with overcoming air defense patriot, iris, s300?
  20. +3
    25 March 2023 22: 07
    It would be nice not to have to use it. Previously, it seemed very strong that low-power missiles would be used, because there was no other way to stop it. Now there may be a small chance that they will come to their senses and begin to hush up the conflict.
    1. 0
      28 March 2023 11: 35
      They will not come to their senses, since the West considers itself ten times stronger than Russia, and therefore they expect that they will win this war with the help of a large amount of weapons and money, and in order to win, they will increase arms supplies and sanctions.
  21. +2
    25 March 2023 22: 08
    It is necessary to beat not in the Kherson region, but in Lviv
  22. -1
    25 March 2023 22: 10
    . We have already handed over to Belarus our well-known, very effective Iskander complex, it can also be a carrier. On April 3, we start training the crew and on July 1 we are finishing the construction of a special storage facility for tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of Belarus, the Russian president added.


    Just try to do something in March. We will answer you in July.
    Seriously?
  23. -4
    25 March 2023 22: 11
    well, it would be nice to arrange a base with nuclear missiles closer to the United States! although the United States will probably align that country to the fullest!
  24. +1
    25 March 2023 22: 17
    Made symbolically and beautifully. But in fact, the Iskanders have long been near Kaliningrad and are not empty.
  25. -1
    25 March 2023 22: 26
    Actually, it would be right. Britain handed over its toxic uranium shells for use and they were used. And someone struck our tiao a blow to Britain. Well, there are few people who want to. So at one moment it would have come to where the red lines are.
    And so nothing will be the answer. Some horror stories. They are not going to use our tiao. And everyone knows this, so they become impudent.
  26. +4
    25 March 2023 22: 29
    Here, Iran still needs to help with its nuclear program, otherwise it’s scary to watch how the poor suffer ..
  27. +1
    25 March 2023 22: 44
    Strong move!
    More precisely, two moves at once, if someone did not pay attention)
    The first is the deployment of even more nuclear weapons closer to the borders of our beloved partners
    And the second - they squeezed Lukashenka after all) After hosting Russian nuclear weapons, it will be difficult to take back, as in the past. Now he is definitely with us. The second chair was sent to the dustbin of history)
    And this is good)
  28. +3
    25 March 2023 22: 45
    The next step across the red lines should be the end of the moratorium and full-scale tests of a megaton warhead in the Caliber format on Novaya Zemlya. With observers from any interested countries. And take a lard of money from each.
    1. 0
      26 March 2023 00: 45
      MichaelYes, it would be desirable, namesake. The world somehow frivolously began to treat nuclear weapons. A full-scale test in the air is necessary, for this it will be necessary to "suspend" participation in the 1963 treaty.
      But a megaton is too much - there is a risk of damaging satellites in orbit. Therefore, 50 kilotons, at an altitude of 10-15 km., So that a flash can be seen from the British Isles.
  29. +1
    25 March 2023 22: 50
    Quote from bombaher
    They are not going to use our tiao

    I have already heard something similar ... Just as confidently, and from many publics ...
    Ahh, I remembered!
    "We are not going and do not plan to send troops to the territory of Ukraine"
    All autumn and almost all winter "did not intend and did not plan"
  30. +2
    25 March 2023 22: 53
    If in your mind, then the NMD should end with the removal of American tactical nuclear weapons from the European continent, as well as the elimination of the American military presence there altogether. But this is not science fiction, alas.
  31. +4
    25 March 2023 23: 05
    Expected move. The logs were very active and received an answer.
  32. +1
    25 March 2023 23: 21
    Yankees itch like lousy dogs wassat
    Great move!
  33. +8
    25 March 2023 23: 25
    Quote from sdivt
    And the second - they squeezed Lukashenka after all) After hosting Russian nuclear weapons, it will be difficult to take back, as in the past. Now he is definitely with us. The second chair was sent to the dustbin of history)
    And this is good)


    where are you boosting from, boosters?) Belarus is always the first to fall under the distribution, purely geographically, every fourth in the Second World War .., maybe that's why dad sometimes has to think! However, Belarusians will stand by the dictates of their hearts, and not by conjuncture or the rotten afterburner of some commentators ..
  34. +1
    25 March 2023 23: 25
    Al fin parece que el gobierno ruso va a empezar a dar pasos verdaderamente contundentes frente al engreimiento y la falta de respeto de la OTAN y las potencias occidentales.
  35. +2
    25 March 2023 23: 26
    I told you for a long time that this would end ... But you still didn’t believe ... It’s going to the third world war, after which the main weapons will be sticks and stones and we won’t live on earth. A gloomy joke turned out, but in every joke there is ...
    1. 0
      26 March 2023 00: 27
      It's going to the third world ...

      No, it's not all that fast. The next steps may be: 1) underground tests on Novaya Zemlya, 2) if it doesn’t help, then withdrawal from the 1963 treaty and an air test there, 3) if this is past, then an air explosion is already over neutral waters, but so others were clearly visible ... well, etc.
      In general, the States are not interested either in the destruction of Russia, or even in its dismemberment. Just to weaken as much as possible the whole of Europe and USE on this, the task is completed. Yes, it's already half done.
      1. 0
        26 March 2023 01: 27
        Perhaps you are right, but the degree of tension is so... At least send demining there... No, not to fucking Ukraine... USA. And so, we are already talking about the use of nuclear weapons - is this possible? I think yes. In the area of ​​​​the territory of the NWO? Yes - three times, but what will follow? That's the question... All your steps mean nothing, if someone decides to start a war - hide in the basement and maybe you'll be lucky and stay alive... for a while.
  36. -1
    25 March 2023 23: 28
    We have already handed over to Belarus our well-known, very efficient Iskander complex. Starting April 3rd we will...

  37. +2
    25 March 2023 23: 33
    I can imagine what a screech of polyandia and their owner will rise
  38. 0
    25 March 2023 23: 33
    And when our government will return nuclear missiles to Cuba. Personally, I was waiting for this instead of NWO on the outskirts. The Americans would again spin like snakes in a frying pan. They would just be hysterical like in the Caribbean crisis. They would have rushed to the talks on mutual security with a swoop. They would have forgotten about the outskirts and would have forgotten to think from an overstrain of the nervous system.
  39. -3
    25 March 2023 23: 41
    There is only one problem with this placement - Lukashenka. The West will remove sanctions from him tomorrow on such an occasion, and now our missiles are directed at us.
    1. 0
      26 March 2023 02: 39
      Then, during the next velvet revolution, our ihtamnets will no longer help him out, but will contribute to the opposition that is necessary.
  40. -1
    25 March 2023 23: 47
    Quote from: mitlantecutli_zen
    Al fin parece que el gobierno ruso va a empezar a dar pasos verdaderamente contundentes frente al engreimiento y la falta de respeto de la OTAN y las potencias occidentales.



    ¡todo estará bien, camaradas!) levantaremos más sanciones con sangría y nos sentaremos sin extraños fraternalmente sin políticos corruptos)
  41. 0
    25 March 2023 23: 56
    it seems like daggers with apples are already there, from the moment the instants were transferred, there is a distance of a tyutelka to a tyutelka to London
  42. The comment was deleted.
  43. +2
    26 March 2023 00: 29
    It's great and the explanation is competent, let them feel it))
  44. +1
    26 March 2023 00: 38
    Moscow and Minsk agreed to place Russian tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of Belarus
    . They are trying to intimidate us, they are trying to spoil us, vigorously oh ... we are preparing to answer, as it should, so that hell in hell would get hot!!!
  45. +3
    26 March 2023 01: 28
    Quote: KCA
    After the use of tactical nuclear weapons, which, both Tactical nuclear weapons and Thermonuclear nuclear weapons, practically does not remain contaminated, oats are now expensive, the fuel burns out in full, not like in the 40s

    Do not say what you understand little, at the site of the explosion, radiation may and will not be prohibitive for a long time, but radioactive rain will fall in different places and in which more than one meteorologist will not say for sure.
  46. +1
    26 March 2023 01: 33
    Quote: Pavel_Sveshnikov
    And when our government will return nuclear missiles to Cuba. Personally, I was waiting for this instead of NWO on the outskirts. The Americans would again spin like snakes in a frying pan. They would just be hysterical like in the Caribbean crisis. They would have rushed to the talks on mutual security with a swoop. They would have forgotten about the outskirts and would have forgotten to think from an overstrain of the nervous system.

    In the Cuban missile crisis, there was no hysteria in the US leadership, if there were hysteria, Cuba would have been dropped by 50 nuclear bombs and there is no Cuba. Nevertheless, the United States was preparing for war and was ready to start it. Sober calculation won.
  47. +2
    26 March 2023 02: 34
    Quote: 30 vis
    . Yes, and it’s time for the Svidobandero-Jidoukrams to wind the settlers around their ears and collect belongings for residence on the Yamal Peninsula .... there is enough space for all of them ... the peninsula is not small ..

    And why are they needed there, why are they needed in the Russian Federation at all?
  48. 0
    26 March 2023 03: 55
    Apparently, all the same, Uncle Xi did not give Uncle Vova anything ..
    Since Uncle Vova personally decided to talk about nuclear weapons
    1. -3
      26 March 2023 05: 01
      Lukashenka flew to China for security guarantees. China decided that the best option would be if Russia transferred nuclear weapons to Belarus on the same basis that the United States deployed nuclear weapons in Germany. The rule of law has been observed, the West cannot put forward claims. But now Poland will not dare to attack Belarus. So the Poles recently received 160 Abrams, and after the complete completion of South Korean and American supplies and doubling the size of the army, the united group in Belarus has practically no chance of resisting conventional means of warfare.
      1. 0
        26 March 2023 05: 41
        I mean, now China is in charge of where Russia can put its nuclear weapons and where not?
        And what else does China now dispose of in Russia?
  49. -3
    26 March 2023 05: 24
    England and the USA in the next week on guano will come out in the media from such news! How so, nizya, we can.
  50. -3
    26 March 2023 08: 01
    World War III has already begun!! It's time to place missiles in Cuba. Or maybe there are already there?
  51. +1
    26 March 2023 08: 21
    And what is there to be happy about? Hit the sparrows from a cannon! And the compass rose? Specifically, now an eagle is flying from Ukraine to Bryansk. follow the link https://www.kitecenter.com.ua/2011-06-10-09-15-32
  52. +1
    26 March 2023 11: 31
    Quote: Maz
    Fire, not news. And rightly so, it’s high time!!! Oh, now the howling and gnashing will begin?!
    So far it has only started here, including on the website. Headdresses of all types, styles and colors flew into the air. lol
    1. -1
      26 March 2023 17: 54
      Quote: Radikal
      Quote: Maz
      Fire, not news. And rightly so, it’s high time!!! Oh, now the howling and gnashing will begin?!
      So far it has only started here, including on the website. Headdresses of all types, styles and colors flew into the air. lol
      Yes, the excitement has reached its climax... lol
  53. The comment was deleted.
  54. 0
    26 March 2023 18: 27
    Quote from Pharmacist
    So if we do not transfer nuclear weapons to Belarus, but place them, then this is also possible in Iran. And not only. am


    Warum nicht endlich auch taktische Atomwaffen in Syrien...?!?

    Der israelische Staat hat doch nun hinlänglich bewiesen, was
    die "Belohnung" für die bisherige Zurückhaltung Russlands
    in dieser Hinsicht ist, nämlich die Lieferung von Waffen und
    Ausrüstung an die Ukraine und Hetze gegen Russland...!!!
  55. 0
    26 March 2023 22: 23
    Quote: tun5t
    A very long process is underway, a vector for getting out of the influence of foreign elites, our officials.


    It is very difficult to uproot these “Russians” from their comfort zone.

    It’s generally not clear how so far none of them have said anything in favor of the SVO.
    Vekselberg, handsome!
    Built a bridge to Crimea.
    And the others?
    They are waiting for who will take it, waiting for Akella to miss.

    Doesn’t the Kremlin really understand that if something goes wrong, hordes of migrants with shovel handles at the ready, incited by the oligarchs, will run after them.

    The defeat of M. Gaddafi, S. Hussein, S. Milosevic might not have happened if their entourage had not sold them.

    How can you trust the people on the list, knowing that they have already transferred everything abroad?
    Their money, their children are there.
    But our Motherland still depends on them.

  56. 0
    27 March 2023 11: 28
    We must congratulate Tikhanovskaya - she is the president of a nuclear power!
    Guaido get ready!