Mithridates VI Eupator, "like Hannibal in hatred of the Romans"

26
Mithridates VI Eupator, "like Hannibal in hatred of the Romans"
Mithridates VI Eupator, bust. Louvre


Talking about Rome, usually pay little attention to its opponents. This is understandable: history the victors wrote, and Roman authors were primarily interested in their own heroes - emperors or generals, even rebellious ones - like Sertorius. The last queen of Ptolemaic Egypt, Cleopatra, attracted attention, since the history of her life was closely connected with the names of Julius Caesar and Mark Antony. An exception was made for Pyrrhus and especially Hannibal Barcis, the generals most dangerous to Rome, who operated in Italy and threatened the very existence of the republic. It was all the more pleasant to write about them because, in the end, they were defeated, and victory over a strong and worthy enemy is always and everywhere valued very highly and dearly. Spartacus stands apart, the war with which was considered shameful, but was so difficult that it was simply impossible to ignore the mysterious leader of the rebellious slaves. But today we will still talk about one of those kings who dared to challenge Rome. It will be about the ruler of the Pontic kingdom Mithridates VI Evpator and the three so-called Mithridates wars. Gaius Velleius Paterculus wrote about this king:



"A leader in plans, a warrior in battle, and in hatred of the Romans like Hannibal."

Lucius Annaeus Florus noted that Hannibal resisted the Romans for thirteen years, and Mithridates for forty.

But first, you have to tell a little about the state ruled by Mithridates VI.

Pontic Kingdom


This Greek-Persian Hellenistic state was founded on the territory of Paphlagonia in 302 BC. e.


Paphlagonia on the map of Asia Minor


Pont on the map

The neighbors of Pontus were Macedonia and the powerful state of the Seleucids. Later, the ancient Bosporan kingdom was attached to it, which was formed around 480 BC. e.

The first ruler of Pontus was Mithridates I Ktist (Builder), a noble Persian who was in the service of the former commander of Alexander the Great, Antigonus One-Eyed. However, the diadochus was angry with him, and the reason for this anger, as they say, was a dream: Antigonus saw that he had sowed the field with gold, and the impudent Persian Mithridates, the governor of the city of Kios, located on the shores of the Sea of ​​​​Marmara, the father and namesake of the founder of the Pontic kingdom, “squeezed harvest". According to Plutarch, Mithridates was on friendly terms with the son of this diadochus, Demetrius Poliorcetes, who was described in two previous articles. Upon learning of his father's arrest and execution, he wrote with a spear on the ground: "Run Mithridates».

Mithridates did not hesitate and fled, hiding in the fortress of Kimiata - on the border of Pontic Cappadocia and Paphlagonia. The same fugitives began to adjoin him, and a new state gradually began to take shape, which at first was called "Cappadocia near Pontus" or "Cappadocia near Euxinus." Its first capital was the city of Amasia (Amasya), the birthplace of Strabo. At various times, this city was also the capital of the Roman provinces of Pontus Galata and Helenopont.

In 282 BC. e. Mithridates I appropriated the title of king (basileus) to himself.

Mountains divided Pontus into two parts. The seaside area was dominated by the Greek population engaged in trade, handicrafts, olive oil production and fishing. Here were the Greek policies of Amastrida (conquered by the son of Mithridates I - Ariobarzanes) and Sinop (it was captured by Pharnaces I and became the new capital of Pontus).


Pontic bronze shield with the name of King Pharnaces I

Representatives of local Anatolian tribes lived in the interior of Asia Minor, whose economy was based on metallurgy, silver mining and animal husbandry. Here was the first capital of the state - Amasia. Greek was the official language of the Pontic kingdom.

The kings of Pontus gradually expanded the borders of their state and entered into prestigious dynastic marriages, for example, with the Seleucids. During the reign of the father of the hero of the article, Mithridates V, the king of Pergamum, Attalus III, died childless (in 133 BC), who allegedly bequeathed his state to Rome. As a result, a new war began - after all, Attalus had a brother, Aristonicus, who had his own opinion on this matter. As a result, Pontus, who acted as an ally of Rome, received Great Phrygia, and the remnants of the Pergamon kingdom were transformed into the Roman province of Asia. And then the Pontics already arbitrarily annexed Cappadocia, Paphlagonia and Galatia, which the Romans could not stand: in 122 BC. e. the Senate issued a decree on the "alienation" of Great Phrygia. And in 120 BC. e. the widow of Mithridates V, who was rumored to have poisoned her husband, transferred all 4 regions to Rome in exchange for recognition of her rights. The Kingdom of Pontus reached its greatest power precisely during the reign of the hero of our article: he managed to capture Bithynia, Cappadocia, the Greek colonies of the Crimean Peninsula, Thrace, Macedonia, and even the Roman province of Asia. Some say that the power of Mithridates VI became the prototype of Byzantium.


Map of the Kingdom of Pontus and the expansion of its territory

Now let's move on to the story of the life and fate of Mithridates VI.

Eupator and Dionysus


Mithridates was born around 135 BC. e. in the city of Sinop. His name can be translated from Persian as "inspired by Mithra". In addition, the hero of our article had two nicknames. The first - Evpator, meant "noble", it was quite common among the rulers of the Hellenistic states. But the second, Dionysus, he received in early childhood because lightning struck his cradle, which lit the diapers, but the baby remained alive and practically did not suffer, only a small scar on his forehead reminded of this incident. The courtiers remembered the legend that Dionysus was born to the daughter of Cadmus (the founder of Thebes) Semele after this woman persuaded her lover, Zeus, to appear to her in his true form - in the radiance of lightning.


G. Moreau. Jupiter and Semele

In addition, Justin claims that during the years of the birth of Mithridates VI and his accession to the throne, bright comets were visible in the sky.

The origin of Mithridates VI was the most noble: among his ancestors on the father's side was the Persian king Darius III, and on the mother's side (Laodice VI, daughter of the Seleucid ruler Antiochus IV) was the Macedonian diadochus commander Seleucus I Nicator. Justin claims that Mithridates VI contemptuously called the rulers of Rome "crowd of vagabonds". To preserve the purity of the blood, this Pontic king married his own sister Laodike. However, he had 4 more wives and a huge number of concubines.

On the eve of the first war with Rome, Mithridates VI minted coins, where he was called the Great, Basileus and even the king of kings.


Tetradrachm of Mithridates VI

Everyone notes the outstanding physical data of this ruler. Thus, Justin writes that:

"At a young age, Mithridates (VI) ran so fast that he could overtake the fastest wild beast."

Plutarch states:

“Everyone recognized him by the scars on his body. Pompey admired his greatness and the size of his weapons. The belt on which the sword was fastened was worth four hundred talents. Even after the death of the great commander, the descendants did not cease to admire everything that reminded him of his unprecedented glory.

It is also reported that Mithridates VI could speak freely with each of his subjects - that is, it turns out that he knew at least 22 languages.

Since during the wars with Rome Mithridates miraculously escaped captivity three times, contemporaries compared him to a snake that, when wounded in the head, slips out of the hands, threatening with its tail.

The hero of the article lost his father early: Mithridates V Euergetes (“The Benefactor”) died in 120 BC. e., according to some sources - from poison, and his wife, Laodice, a princess from the Seleucid family, was suspected of poisoning the king. Both sons of this king at that time were minors, and therefore it was Laodice who came to power in the Pontic kingdom. Her favorite son was the youngest named Khrest, and Mithridates, who feared for his life, fled from home. Since he was between 11 and 14 years old at that time, it can be assumed that the escape was organized by an opposition court group that wanted to use the prince for their own purposes. Some authors claim that over the next 7 years Mithridates was hiding in the mountains, but it is more likely that most of this time he lived at the court of the king of Lesser Armenia Antipater, who, having no sons, fell in love with the boy so much that he bequeathed his lands to him. They say that it was then that Mithridates began to accustom his body to poisons, because of which he allegedly could not poison himself later.

Basileus Mithridates VI


In 113 BC. Mithridates triumphantly returned to Pontus and took the throne. His mother and younger brother were arrested on his orders and soon died in prison (perhaps they were killed), but they were buried with royal honors.

Mithridates VI was officially married 5 times, and his first wife, as we remember, was his sister Laodike, who gave birth to 5 children from him. One of the daughters of Mithridates, Cleopatra, in 94 BC. e. was married to the powerful Armenian king Tigran II.

Immediately after coming to power, Mithridates began to expand his possessions.


Asia Minor before the attack of Mithridates VI

Initially, the Pontic troops, led by the commander Diophantus, were sent to help Chersonese, which was threatened by the Roxolani and Scythians. According to one version, after the victory, Diophantus founded a new fortress, which was named after this king - Evpatoria. However, historians object, saying that the Greek city of Kerkinitis was already on this site. Then the Tatar city of Kezlev (from the word “spring”) was located here, after the conquest of the Crimea it was called Kozlov, but then, in 1784, it was given the Greek name Evpatoria. But in Pontus, Evpatoria was nevertheless built - at the intersection of two important roads in the Phanarea valley, which is located on the territory of the modern Turkish province of Tokat.

Let us return to the time of Mithridates VI and see that at that time the important and large cities of Olivia and Chersonese recognized the authority of this king. An agreement was also concluded on the inheritance of the Kingdom of Bosporus by Mithridates, which caused discontent among the local nobility and the rebellion of Savmak, who killed the legitimate king of the Spartokid dynasty, Perisad V. But this only accelerated the accession of Bosporus to Pontus: Savmak was defeated and captured, in 108-107. BC e. The Bosporus kingdom lost its independence, Pontic garrisons were placed in Theodosius and Panticapaeum.

In 106-105 years. BC e. Mithridates annexed part of Paphlagonia, dividing it with the Bithynian king Nicomedes, in 104-103. - Colchis, where, according to Strabo, he built 75 fortresses, as well as part of western Armenia. But the interests of Pontus came into conflict with the interests of Rome, whose armies twice acted on the side of the Bithynian king Nicomedes. Bithynia was extremely important for the Romans, since it was on its territory that the Black Sea straits were located, through which communication was carried out with the Roman province of Asia. In the end, Mithridates decided to confront Rome. The situation seemed to favor his plans. The Romans initially waged a difficult Allied war with the Italic tribes, as a result of which they were forced to grant them citizenship rights. And then, in Rome itself, the parties of optimates and populists clashed for life and death. Sulla led an army to his own capital, assembled for the war with Mithridates, and his troops entered Rome - for the first time in the history of this city. And at this time, the Roman troops of the proconsul Manius Aquilius and the governor of Asia, Lucius Cassius, allied to the Bithynian king Nicomedes, were defeated. Cassius fled to Rhodes, and Manius Aquilius was captured, the Pontics drove him tied around the cities on a donkey, and then executed him by pouring molten gold into his throat. On the other hand, in 88 BC. e. Mithridates organized a massacre of Roman citizens, the victims of which were up to 80 thousand people. Then the fighting was transferred to Greece. However, Sulla, albeit 18 months late, nevertheless came to the war with Pontus. Now Mithridates and his generals were opposed by the merciless machine of the Roman army of the last century of the republic, led by a commander who always achieved his goal and in his entire life did not suffer a single defeat.

First Mithridatic War


So, using the border conflict with Bithynia as a pretext, in 89 BC. e. Mithridates declared war on Rome. On his side were the Armenian king Tigran II (married to the daughter of Mithridates), various policies and tribes of the Balkan Peninsula and Cilician pirates, who represented a formidable force and felt like the real masters of the Mediterranean Sea. The beginning of the war turned out to be successful: Bithynia, Phrygia, Paphlagonia were captured, and the loyalty of the local population was achieved. It was announced the restoration of self-government in cities, the forgiveness of arrears, tax exemption for 5 years. The Pontic commander Archelaus captured the island of Delos and found support in Laconia and Boeotia. In Athens, a supporter of Mithridates Aristinion seized power. And only now, in 87 BC. e. Sulla's army landed in Epirus, from where it moved to Attica. Here Sulla defeated the Pontic troops of Archelaus and began the siege of Athens. They say that then, for the construction of siege engines intended for the assault on the Acropolis, the groves of Plato's Academy and Aristotle's Lyceum were cut down.


Siege of Athens 87-86 BC e.

March 1, 86 B.C. e. Athens was taken by storm and heavily devastated. To replenish the military treasury, Sulla, without hesitation, ordered the confiscation of the treasures of several Athenian temples and even the famous temple of Apollo at Delphi. Archelaus still held Piraeus, but, without waiting for help, he sailed to Thessaly. Here the remnants of his troops joined with another Pontic army, commanded by Taxilus. Their combined troops were defeated in the battle of Chaeronea, where the Macedonian king Philip, Alexander's father, once won his famous victory over the Greeks. The Pontics received reinforcements, but in 86 BC. e. in Boeotia suffered a new defeat - at Orchomenus. However, at some point, the situation on the battlefield developed in such a way that Sulla had to stop the fleeing soldiers with a banner in his hands.

Against the background of these failures in Asia Minor, the Galatians rebelled against Mithridates. And in the Aegean Sea, the Roman squadron of Lucius Licinius Lucullus was now operating, which we will talk about later. The Pontic fleet was defeated in a naval battle at Tenedos, after which Sulla's army crossed into Asia Minor. Mithridates entered into peace negotiations. At another time, Sulla would probably have preferred to finish off the king of Pontus, but in Rome the populace came to power and outlawed him. Therefore, Sulla in 85 BC. e. went to the signing of the Dardanian peace treaty, according to the terms of which the Pontics withdrew troops from the territories they occupied, gave the Romans 80 warships and agreed to pay three thousand talents of gold (about 75 tons). Sulla was proclaimed emperor by the soldiers and went to Italy. Ahead was a new civil war and the first proscriptions in the history of Rome.

Second Mithridatic War


The Dardanian world did not suit either Mithridates or the Romans, but was used by them to solve their problems. Mithridates brought into obedience the fallen Bosporans and Colchians. He even had to execute his son Mithridates, who, being sent to the Bosporus as a governor, began to pursue a separatist policy. In his place, another son of the Pontic king, Mahar, was sent, who also did not justify his father's hopes. And Sulla fought with the Marians and "put things in order" in Italy, he did not need a war in Asia Minor. However, the legate of Sulla, Lucius Licinius Murena, who remained in the east with two legions, dreamed of the glory of the great commander. Taking advantage of the military preparations of Mithridates VI directed against the Bosporus and Colchis, he accused him of aggressive intentions towards Rome and its allies - and delivered a "preemptive strike." In 83 BC. e. he arbitrarily attacked Pontus and was defeated near the river Halys. After this, several minor battles took place, which did not give an advantage to either side. Finally, having defeated his rivals in Italy, Sulla ordered Murena to stop hostilities. The winner was Mithridates, who occupied part of Cappadocia through a dynastic marriage. So in 81 BC. e. and ended the Second Mithridatic War. However, the ambassadors of Mithridates who went to Rome arrived there after the death of Sulla, who, although he retired, continued to exert a serious influence on the policy of the Republic. It was Sulla who ordered Murena to stop hostilities and was determined to sign a full-fledged peace treaty with Pontus. Now, no one cared about the ambassadors of Mithridates, and they left, confident that the Romans did not want peace, but, on the contrary, were preparing for war.

The immediate cause of the new conflict was the annexation of Bithynia by Rome, whose king Nicomedes IV Philopator died childless. He bequeathed his state to Rome, which Mithridates VI did not like very much. And the main opponent of Mithridates at the first stage of this war was the famous Lucullus, who was not only a deli, gourmet and sybarite, but also a good commander and diplomat. We will talk about Lucullus and the Third Mithridatic War in a separate article.
26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    26 March 2023 04: 15
    the widow of Mithridates V, who was rumored to have poisoned her husband, transferred all 4 regions to Rome in exchange for recognition of her rights.

    Well, the manners of the queen ... and if we don’t hurt our hubby ... I want to be rich. what
    The history of ancient Rome is a continuous series of wars, intrigues, tragedies of thousands and thousands of people.
    1. +2
      26 March 2023 12: 23
      He had 5 wives, but where did the previous ones go.? If the "widow of Mithridates", then those were gone?
      1. +1
        29 March 2023 10: 07
        Quote from lisikat2
        He had 5 wives, but where did the previous ones go.?

        Katya. They were at the same time. This is in addition to concubines.
        Remember the harems of the Turkish sultans in the same territory 1700 years later.
        Quote from lisikat2
        If the "widow of Mithridates", then those were gone?

        Katyusha.
        They were all Mithridates. This is such a "surname". Next came the name (nickname) and the modern number.
    2. +2
      26 March 2023 15: 15
      A common occurrence in those years. In the palaces they poisoned everyone and everything .. Such morals among the rulers ..
    3. +2
      26 March 2023 19: 58
      Awww...Where are you - representatives of the Baku armenophobic propaganda??? Send the author of this article a couple of kilos of Caspian black caviar in a parcel so that he smears with ink a map of Greater Armenia (the eastern neighbor of the Pontic Kingdom) ...
  2. +9
    26 March 2023 06: 40
    With all due respect to Mithridates, he falls short of Hannibal
  3. +9
    26 March 2023 06: 50
    Mithridates VI could speak freely with each of his subjects - that is, it turns out that he knew at least 22 languages.
    Not only .. Mithridates VI loved music and poetry. He collected exquisite antiques and was an unquestioned authority in the field of precious stones and jewelry. He loved to drink and eat, at feasts no one ate or drank more than him. time remains undeniable, its unfathomable cruelty. One of his great and dangerous hobbies was the study of poisons, which is why he also received the nickname King of Poisons. One of his favorite pastimes was to invite his officials and friends to a feast, poison a plate of food and serve it at random. A sort of "Mithridatic roulette".
    1. +11
      26 March 2023 07: 37
      He was indomitable in "amorous" affairs.
      Appian about Mithridates VI Evpator:
      "He lived for 68 or 69 years, of which 57 years he was king. Power passed to him when he was an orphan. He subjugated the neighboring barbarian peoples, and many of the Scythians obeyed him; he stubbornly waged war with the Romans for 40 years .. "In spirit, even in adversity, he was great and did not succumb to despair. He left no way not to try to attack the Romans, even when defeated ... Wounded often by enemies or through malicious intent by someone else, he even in In this case, he did not stop the enterprise, although he was already an old man. Indeed, not one of the conspiracies hid from him, even the last one, but, voluntarily leaving him unattended, he died from him ... He was prone to murder and ferocious in relation to all, he killed his mother and brother, and of his children three sons and three daughters, he was large in body, as far as can be judged by the weapons that he sent to Nemea and Delphi, strong enough that he rode to the very end , could throw spears and travel a thousand stadia a day, exchanging for lime long distances of horses. He drove a chariot drawn by 1 horses at once. He loved Hellenic culture, so he knew and performed Hellenic religious rites; also loved music. Being so prudent and hardy, he had only one weakness - in pleasures with women.
      Conclusion:
      “All troubles are from women. If you do not agree with this, then you are a woman.”™
      1. +8
        26 March 2023 08: 34
        “All troubles are from women. If you do not agree with this, then you are a woman.
        This conclusion is universal, not only for my comment, but also for the article. And I should bookmark my entire library on paper, in electronic form and not quote from memory. For, this is a sin. laughing
      2. +4
        26 March 2023 12: 08
        And how did they react to this "roulette"?
        In that case, Borgia is just a plagiarist?
      3. +4
        26 March 2023 12: 29
        I am a WOMAN, but I agree with your conclusion only 15%
        The rest is on: greed and male selfishness
  4. +7
    26 March 2023 07: 12
    Mithridates was born around 135 BC. e. in the city of Sinop. His name can be translated from Persian as "inspired by Mithra".

    Usually they translate "Mithra given" or "Gift of Mithra".
    And more could be written about this, but here is not a holy synod, and we can not follow the instructions of the Byzantine emperor Theodosius, made in the last decade of the 25th century, to outlaw Mithraism. Mithraism is the religion of the god Mithras. Mitra did not distinguish between rich and poor, between slaves and warriors, he promised a blissful afterlife. Upon entering the community, it was necessary to undergo the rite of washing and communion with water and wine. Mitra's birthday according to the Roman calendar is December XNUMXth. Christianity borrowed much from Mithraism and tried to destroy any trace of the ancient Persian religion, with roots in India, the religion of the Persian empires and Roman legionaries at the beginning of our era, a religion that the Greeks with their variety of gods could not stand, unlike Mithras alone, who had a thousand ears and a thousand eyes. Even temples were rebuilt or destroyed. God Mithra was also the protector and judge of the souls of the dead, who will lead the righteous to paradise on the last day of the world...
    "Coincidence? I don't think so."
    Just do not ask our priests about Mithraism, you will immediately acquire an enemy in your face. In the history "thanks" to Christianity, there are many blank spots both in world history and in the history of Russia.
    1. VLR
      +6
      26 March 2023 11: 43
      There is a version that for some time Mithraism and Christianity "fought for minds", and at some point a balance came. But Mithraism was popular among men, while Christianity was popular among women. And women brought up children in a Christian spirit. And this ultimately ensured the victory of Christianity: "yin",
      "soft power", "yang" won.
      1. 0
        29 March 2023 10: 35
        Quote: VlR
        "soft power", "yang" won.

        If so, the end effect was the opposite of what the moms wanted.
        Christianity pretty quickly turned women off from the management of communities. The first was the apostle Paul, then it started running.
        There is only one reason - not the constancy of a woman in short periods of time. Once every 14 days, priorities in relation to a particular man can change radically (swing ladies - no ladies). Full or partial dismissal of the functions of the father-husband in the upbringing of born children.
        "Throwing" views in the process of menopause. A state from total hatred to total love.
        Adoption of persistent inflexible, radical views after menopause.
        ... Maemo then sho maemo.
        PS. Both female instability and male conservatism are equal causes of this problem.
  5. +8
    26 March 2023 07: 41
    lightning struck his cradle, which ignited the diapers, but the baby remained alive and practically did not suffer, only a small scar on his forehead reminded of this incident
    just like Harry Potter laughing
  6. +7
    26 March 2023 08: 34
    The episode with the "genocide" of the Romans is mysterious. Nowhere does it say that it was the soldiers of Mithridates who killed them, and the inhabitants of the cities hid them in their homes. It seems, on the contrary, that there was an initiative from below. And Sulla is waging an ordinary war - not "holy": he does not appeal to soldiers with calls to avenge the treacherously killed, to demolish the Pontic cities to the ground, and so on. And the agreement concludes the usual one - robs the vanquished, deprives them of resources for a new war - and that's it. Perhaps he knows that there was some kind of "Sicilian Supper" and there are no grounds for revenge against Mithridates? And then later Roman authors could hang "genocide" on Mithridates?
  7. +2
    26 March 2023 11: 55
    "Married my own sister." Then they did not know the CONCEPT: INCEST?
    Valery, how was it with their children? Everything is fine
    1. VLR
      +6
      26 March 2023 12: 16
      Among the Egyptian Ptolemies, marriages with sisters were in the order of things, taking an example from the pharaohs. The Persian king Cambyses was married to two sisters at once. The ancient kings of Ireland also did not particularly bother. The Spanish Habsburgs degenerated on the background of incest. Even Queen Victoria was married to a cousin, and the recently deceased Elizabeth was married to a second cousin. Like many other kings and queens - if not first cousins, then second cousins, or uncles-nieces. Lots of examples. Among the highest aristocrats in any country, almost all marriages were between men and women in varying degrees of kinship, misalliances were a scandal.
  8. +2
    26 March 2023 12: 28
    It seems that there is Mount Mithridates in Kerch. Is it connected with this Six?
    1. VLR
      +5
      26 March 2023 14: 10
      Yes, there is one in Kerch, at the top - the ruins of Panticapaeum. It is believed that it was named after the hero of the article, who died on it.
      1. +2
        27 March 2023 22: 28
        Just this year (2023) I was in Kerch in early January. The stairs have been completely restored. Very beautiful. Here are the photos from there, parts 1-2 (pictures as you climb to the top).




        1. +1
          27 March 2023 22: 34
          And here's a little more already at the top ... part 2-2:





          1. +1
            27 March 2023 22: 49
            And this is a bonus. A photo with an increase in the "thing" that is visible in the last photo at the top, in its upper part of the photo.

  9. +5
    26 March 2023 15: 35
    Thank you for the article! Although Mithridates was not such a strong enemy of Rome as Hannibal, Mithridates is still a worthy opponent of Rome. Have a nice day everyone!
  10. +1
    27 March 2023 21: 27
    We are waiting for articles about the quaestor and consul Lucullus and his feasts after demobilization.
    I am grateful to the author for a series of articles.
  11. -8
    27 March 2023 22: 04
    In the Crimea, in Kerch there are monuments to Mithridates.
  12. The comment was deleted.