The Armed Forces of Ukraine cannot survive in the “gladiator battle” with Russia: British analyst calls for a switch to mobile warfare

The supporting structure of Western propaganda is the dogma of the superiority of the "civilized world", which, unlike the rest of humanity, has become the alleged focus of progress. Military analysts argue in the same vein when studying the course of the conflict in Ukraine.

According to the British observer Sean Bell, the NWO is accompanied by heavy losses in personnel and equipment, which are suffered by both warring parties. He believes that such battles are more in line with "gladiator fights" or "medieval battles", when opponents fought to the point of exhaustion.

In his opinion, this approach proved to be fully effective in the battle for Artyomovsk. Despite the recommendations of the American military, who advocated a “maneuverable war” and offered to withdraw troops from this city, Zelensky decided to fight for Artyomovsk to the last, hoping to withstand the confrontation with Russian troops.

As Bell explains, this is fundamentally different from the Western doctrine of war, which was developed after two bloody world wars and involves minimal losses due to the active use of high-tech weapons.

But Zelensky decided to cling to the city, thus drawing himself into a war of attrition that threatens Russia's victory.

According to the analyst, the RF Armed Forces can be defeated only by waging a high-tech war. Therefore, he calls on the Armed Forces of Ukraine to retreat, rebuild, get stronger and fight with new forces. But this requires the supply of expensive weapons, the stocks of which in the West turned out to be "inadequate."

Can the West provide sufficient resources to implement a maneuverable approach to warfare that saves lives and preserves infrastructure?

- the British analyst asks, apparently not wanting to understand from the “height of his flight” the complete indifference of the “civilized world” to the damage that Ukraine and its population are suffering.

Comments

[dmi.pris1]

They waged a maneuver war in the second half of last year. To a certain extent, they succeeded. But, I hope that we have taken measures, saturated the liquid defensive formations, defense knots.

[I dare to_notice_]

What measures?
Logistics complete.
There is where to maneuver, on what (fuels) and on what (bridges, roads).
There are no problems with communication at all.
Or did I miss something?..

[Sanichsan]

Quote: I dare_notice_

There is maneuvering on what, where, on what (fuels) and on what (bridges, roads).

still specify, but where to maneuver then? unlike last autumn, now there is a solid front line and maneuvering only from or to the front line on which it is hot everywhere. well, or according to British tradition in Kolle.

[Volunteer Marek]

After two world wars, the West has not yet met with an equal enemy. It is not for him to judge how to fight. I think that it is unlikely that Western soldiers would have fought with such frenzy after so many decades of "comfortable" clashes for them.

[dmi.pris1]

I also don’t think that they won’t be furious ... But the whole point is that they are fighting with the wrong hands. With the same hands and brains as ours. Yes, wrapped in the ideology of Nazism, propaganda. Themselves, personally, for with the exception of individual goofs, they do not fight with us. Among all this shobla, I would note the Poles. It will be difficult with them.

[Volunteer Marek]

Here, that's the point! Absolutely agree. And, the question of maneuverable combat operations is the question of destruction ... yes, the question of destroying bridges, tunnels, overpasses, roads, sidings, etc. that has set everyone on edge. and so on.

[Mountain shooter]

Retreat? Exactly, we need to retreat ... but where to stay? At Warsaw?

[1erWahrheitsMinister_1984]

Wenn man das ÜBEL an der Wurzel packen wollte, müsste
man nur London und Washington mit allem was man hat
AUSRADIEREN, dann wäre sofort Ruhe und man könnte
auch verhandeln...!!!!!!!!!!

[Prokop_Pork]

"...the complete indifference of the "civilized world" to the damage that Ukraine and its population are suffering."
Not even indifference, but quite a joyful interest. With a thirst for blood, like spectators of gladiator fights. The bigger, the better.

[tralflot1832]

American maneuver warfare: We hammer the enemy into the Stone Age, and then we maneuver around the country without encountering resistance. We also know how. We have such a war for NATO.

[Lawrence_OnYouNo]

Quote: tralflot1832

We also know how. We have such a war for NATO.

we will win with slogans !!!!!
ps
Mariupol was bombed with 1500kg bombs, why don't we bomb other cities?
PPP
for NATO there is only nuclear weapons.

[Andryukha G]

The British troops were already waging a maneuver war with Hitler, the British troops fled faster than the wind from the German troops, leaving all the equipment and boots with laces in Dunkirk ...

[dmi.pris1]

It was not so much a maneuver war as the outcome of a "strange war." There was only flight from maneuvers

[Leader_Barmaleev]

The supporting structure of Western propaganda is the dogma of the superiority of the "civilized world", which, unlike the rest of humanity, has become the alleged focus of progress.

And the supporting structure of the Western world is that they believe in these fairy tales and make decisions based on this FAITH. What happens to a person who walks through a minefield on a map that he himself invented, based on the speculative dogma of his own genius? Well, at least he has the opportunity to brainstorm.

[AAK]

But I don’t quite understand something else. The American-European enemies of Russia call for a pragmatic maneuverable optimization of hostilities, the dill enemies of Russia insist on continuing the heroic bloody defensive actions ... and what Russia thinks through the mouths of certain people about the future type of military operations, for now, on in my opinion, these very faces have no concept of the word at all ...

[Lawrence_OnYouNo]

Quote: AAK

Russia through the mouths of certain persons about the further type of hostilities

after the failure of the first stage and the realization of many problems in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, there will be active defense during the year (for a year the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation must get rid of vices, accumulate strength and means).

[rocket757]

The Armed Forces of Ukraine cannot survive in the “gladiator battle” with Russia: British analyst calls for a switch to mobile warfare

. Against any tactic there is counteraction ... the question is the availability of resources and the desire to kill the enemy completely.

[Tma197725]

Damn they maneuvered in Vietnam! Yes, and in Iraq, their maneuver consisted in “buying” how many generals they took Basra and El Falluja? A war of maneuver is good against the Indians. To whom there is nothing to answer. Regarding the events near Kharkov, there was not only nothing to answer, but stupidly no one! lie down is not a pity. I just want to hope that this time we will resist!

[Dynamic systems]

It is necessary to demand from the UK to liberate the territories of Gibraltar and the Falklands - at least!

[single-n]

Quite reasonable advice. But there are a couple of tricks here.
1. trained soldiers are needed for mobile warfare. Although the Armed Forces of Ukraine are preparing them, it is clear that they have not yet managed to accumulate enough. Otherwise chaos and loss of control. The training of junior commanders is especially important. Since you will have to coordinate "on the fly" and there will be no time to explain the task in detail.
2. Large fuel reserves and repair capabilities. On the marches, the equipment will "burn" with terrible force. Even without meeting the enemy at all. Rem bases and fuel tanks, refueling points are a tasty target for all kinds of missiles. You can’t carry hundreds / thousands of tons in barrels. And you can’t store them. It is possible to repair equipment in the field, but not always.
3. Communications and intelligence. Well, here the APU seems to be doing well.

[tihonmarine]

Zelensky decided to fight for Artyomovsk to the last, hoping to withstand the confrontation with Russian troops.

We know that Biden decided to fight to the last Ukrainian, and Zelensky is just the appointed head of the occupation administration, who does not have a word, he is a simple performer.

[alexey_444]

Maneuvering war is like fighting in Hollywood, only in one case the superiority of one side over the other is possible. How the West is accustomed to fighting with the Popuas. With equal opponents, the war is positional, while Artyomovsk shows, with well-trained infantry, it is possible for the attacking side to suffer fewer losses than the defending orc mobs, when, due to the proximity of contact, the accuracy of the orc artillery is not measured by the impossibility of its use, you can’t win much with mortars. But for trained infantry, like for special forces, the main joint is their number, it is not infinite. The same Kupyansk, where a 6-fold superiority allowed maneuvering, but it didn’t work out near Kherson, they were more or less equal. Let analysts dream further.

[Nevsky_ZU]

Quote: alexey_444

Maneuvering war is like fighting in Hollywood, only in one case the superiority of one side over the other is possible. How the West is accustomed to fighting with the Popuas. With equal opponents, the war is positional, while Artyomovsk shows, with well-trained infantry, it is possible for the attacking side to suffer fewer losses than the defending orc mobs, when, due to the proximity of contact, the accuracy of the orc artillery is not measured by the impossibility of its use, you can’t win much with mortars. But for trained infantry, like for special forces, the main joint is their number, it is not infinite. The same Kupyansk, where a 6-fold superiority allowed maneuvering, but it didn’t work out near Kherson, they were more or less equal. Let analysts dream further.

The comment is sensible, but who do you call "orcs"? Us Russians?

[YanniKounnar]

Donc cet "analyste Britannique" aurait voulu que l'armée Ukrainienne "batte en retraite ,se regroupe, se renforce..." en somme il regrette que l'armée Ukrainienne ne se soit pas "regroupée" comme l'a fait l' armee...Russe.
Il souhaite donc que les Ukrainiens fassent ce dont ils se sont gaussé lorsque les Russes l'ont fait :-)

So this "British analyst" allegedly wanted the Ukrainian army to "retreat, regroup, fortify... "in short, he regrets that the Ukrainian army did not "regroup" as the Russian army did.
That's why he wants the Ukrainians to do what they mocked when the Russians did it :-)

[paul3390]

the dogma of the superiority of the "civilized world", which, unlike the rest of humanity, has become the alleged focus of progress

That is why - they will not leave Russia behind as long as at least one bearer of the memory of the great Soviet Union is alive .. Which very clearly proved that technological progress is by no means equal to Western democracy and, like, a free market .. And this is scary - suddenly we all the same come to our senses and decide to return to the glorious road of our grandfathers?

[kill the fascist]

Even if you omit the presence of nuclear weapons. The West knows perfectly well that it will not be able to wage a bone-to-bone war with Russia. In all the extreme wars in the West, there was a huge technical advantage over the enemy. In a war with Russia there will be no such technical superiority. Even as the war with Banderlogia shows, the West will not have an advantage in the air. And this is another war. That is why they prepared trousers for the war with Russia as close ones mentally and in spirit, ready to endure. And the author sang differently now ... are they preparing the ground for a truce?

[Joker62]

Quote: 1erWahrheitsMinister_1984

Wenn man das ÜBEL an der Wurzel packen wollte, müsste
man nur London und Washington mit allem was man hat
AUSRADIEREN, dann wäre sofort Ruhe und man könnte
auch verhandeln...!!!!!!!!!!

Are you talking about a deal???
No, we'd better come back to Berlin and Paris, and at the same time, it didn't hurt to visit London! That's where we'll talk...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sprechen Sie mit Vereinbarung???
Nein, es ist besser, wir werden wieder nach Berlin und Paris kommen, und gleichzeitig hat es sich nicht die Mühe gemacht, London zu besuchen! Also werden wir dort reden...

[MakStVik]

Let them maneuver to Poland. Leave Russian cities alone.

[Ezekiel 25-17]

Quote: I dare_notice_

What measures?
Logistics complete.
There is where to maneuver, on what (fuels) and on what (bridges, roads).
There are no problems with communication at all.
Or did I miss something?..

So far, yes, you are right, but this is for now: Russia can cut off communications, and troops on the march are more vulnerable