“In this situation, we have the right to defend ourselves with any weapon”: Medvedev commented on the suspension of the New START

The West has actually declared war on Russia and is ready to destroy it, in such a situation we have the right to defend ourselves by any weapons, including nuclear. Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation Dmitry Medvedev commented on the suspension of the START, as well as the speech of the American president.

The suspension of Russia's participation in START is the right and inevitable decision taken in the current situation. Until yesterday, the United States thought that they could spoil Russia everywhere and in everything, work for its destruction, but Moscow will not dare to touch the START treaty, since it should not concern relations between Russia and the United States. However, Washington made a mistake, and grossly. In a situation where the United States openly declares its desire to destroy Russia in its current form, we have the right to defend ourselves with any weapon, including nuclear.

According to Medvedev, NATO has a much larger nuclear arsenal than Russia, the START does not take into account the nuclear arsenals of France and Great Britain, and this is long overdue.

Commenting on Biden's address to the Russian people, which he made in front of a crowd of Poles in Warsaw, the Russian politician called it a traditional American "sermon" adjusted for senile insanity. The American president tried to convince everyone that the US does not intend to destroy Russia when all their actions indicate otherwise.

Medvedev also paraphrased Biden's statement about Ukraine, in which he stated that "If Russia stops the invasion, it will end right now. If the Ukrainians stop defending, this will be the end of Ukraine."

If Russia stops the NWO without achieving victory, Russia will not exist, it will be torn to pieces. If the US stops supplying weapons to the Kyiv regime, the war will end

- he added.

Comments

[Silver99]

I would like to ask, but in addition to France and Britain, China, India, Pakistan still have nuclear weapons, and no matter how tricky guys with sidelocks from Israel, does anyone take it into account? Where will their charges fly or will they "quietly" detonate in the mines?

[ivan1979nkl]

fully agree with the sentence:

Suspension of Russia's participation in START is the right and inevitable decision

now the time has begun to work for Russia against the United States and NATO - we will equip hypersonic carriers with nuclear warheads, which will reduce the bellicose enthusiasm of the West

[Egeny]

As for "time working for Russia", I agree with you, extinguish the "enthusiasm of the West" ...
yes, it is necessary, than ... that's another question.
The darkest one very competently solved this problem: the treaty does not contain the concept of "suspension of membership", which is why we do not comply with the agreement, but we do not withdraw from the New START.

[Egeny]

And I am popular in the society of inadequate natives of the outskirts.)
Turn on your brains, guys, well ... if there is still at least some of the gray matter left.

[credo]

The "song" about France and England is old, since the days of the USSR, but we have not yet solved it.
Instead of pouring from empty to empty, both the USSR and Russia should long ago have added the nuclear arsenals of the indicated duo to the same arsenals of the United States, simultaneously taking into account Israel, Pakistan, India and China, but in some incomprehensible way it does not grow together and remains in the upper echelons of power a fairly large backbone of soft-bodied and pliant to Western flattery figures who, behind the sweet speeches of the Anglo-Saxons, do not see their predatory grin and bestial hatred for Russia and everything else connected with it.

[fax66]

“In this situation, we have the right to defend ourselves with any weapon”: Medvedev commented on the suspension of the New START.

So let's defend! Who is against something? For half a year everyone has been shouting about this, but they just can’t get through to the “top” ....
She is very busy - she comes up with slogans and speaks, speaks, speaks, speaks ......

[dmi.pris1]

It's just another blah blah blah. Without conclusions and real actions

[fax66]

Actually, it’s my fault, but I didn’t mean the nuclear weapons.

[Egeny]

Compensate for your shortcomings.)
Hello Dima. All that the Darkest cannot say aloud, says Medvedev,
...in his own way.

[Yapet100]

Again words ... words ... And NATO is testing more and more new weapons on Russia ...

[tihonmarine]

Quote: Yapet100

Again words ... words ... And NATO is testing more and more new weapons on Russia ...

But they have a big problem with nuclear weapons, which is why they squeal like "in our collective farm pigsty." And everything here is very prosaic.
Putin mentioned that the expiration date of nuclear weapons is expiring in the United States.
Mass production of nuclear warheads in the United States was halted in 1989 when the FBI raided the Rocky Flats plant in Colorado. Leaks and radioactive contamination of the nearby area at this plant were recorded as early as the 1960s, including a major fire, the elimination of the consequences of which took two years. Due to violations at the plant, in 1989, chromic acid got into the city's sanitary water collector. The FBI began its own investigation, which ended in 1992 with the recognition of the operator, Rockwell, as guilty of 10 environmental crimes and the largest fine at that time for environmental crimes of $ 18,5 million.
In the same year, the plant was closed, the scale of contamination was so huge that more than 800 buildings had to be demolished, more than 21 tons of radioactive materials had to be moved, more than 1,3 million cubic meters of waste removed and more than 72 million liters of water recycled. The cleanup process was only completed in 2005 at a cost of $7 billion, turning the former plant site into a wildlife sanctuary.
At the moment, the United States has only one laboratory left in Los Alamos, where it is possible to carry out manipulations with nuclear warheads. From 2007 to 2011, a total of 29 upgrades of nuclear warheads for submarine-launched missiles were made there, and since 2013, all work has been suspended due to non-compliance with the rules for working with radioactive materials.

In 2021, work resumed and in June of that year, the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) announced that it had successfully completed the first upgrade of warheads for submarine-launched missiles, albeit a year late and several hundred million dollars over budget. .
The essence of the modernization was that a new electronic fuse, a fuse and a blasting substance to activate the charge were installed for the 1988 nuclear charge. NNSA estimates that the total cost of the upgrade program will be $2,8 billion through 2026. According to the Bulletin of the Nuclear Scientists, there are about 3800 nuclear warheads in the US that are between 30 and 40 years old. American scientists have repeatedly conducted studies on the durability of existing nuclear weapons. In 2003, after research, NNSA gave an estimate of the minimum service life of nuclear charges for 45 years from the date of manufacture.

[Boris Sergeev]

It seems that while Medvedev was in his first positions, he was entrusted with the role of a "good investigator", but now, having appointed him as a deputy, he was assigned the role of a "bad" one. All the same, decisions are made by completely different people.

[Egeny]

decisions are made by different people.

absolutely right ...

[vargo]

Zhirinovsky was gone (And Dmitry took his role as a sharp politician carrying an opinion on the verge or right in the face. I would compare this role with a certain role of a jester under the tsar. Jesters did not just say something like that. , but honestly, as if in jest, but ...
The analogy is a bit strained, but after Zhirinovsky left, someone had to take his role. Dmitry fit right in here

[oleg-nekrasov-19]

The NWO will be completed upon achieving the goals and objectives, this is exactly what the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation confirmed

[Leader_Barmaleev]

If you do not complicate - clearly formulate these goals and objectives. This is not a hit on you, just maybe you know what exactly will be considered a victory in this strange war. Please - do not use the words denazification and demilitarization due to the enormous vagueness of these concepts. Thanks in advance.

[Yapet100]

These words about NWO have already become some kind of mantra! Yes, there is no sense in this mantra!

[Leader_Barmaleev]

The best defense is an offense and the best defense is an attack.

these are not my words - this maxim is more than one millennium old. But I have a feeling that our leadership has not studied history or philosophy, has not read the great works, and looks not so much at the map of the world as into their pocket - the agreements of the last days are a vivid example of this.

[rotmistr60]

in such a situation, we have the right to defend ourselves with any weapon, including nuclear

In fact, Russia has much more rights than it uses today, and this is not only the right to use nuclear weapons if necessary. It is the right to respond to a terrorist attack against our country with an act of retaliation against the country that committed it. This is the right to more harshly and even rudely shut the mouths of Western Russophobes who do not know the limits in their statements. Yes, and much more.

[Epaulettes]

If Russia stops NVO without achieving victory, Russia will not exist, it will be torn to pieces

Unfortunately, if the NWO continues to go on as it has been going on for a year, Russia will be torn to pieces and without stopping the NWO ...
It is impossible to win when your opponent is not beheaded and freely receives all military assistance from the untouchables for Russia.
And no mobilization will save Russia - if the West has set the goal of destroying Russia, they will not stop, and they will respond to our mobilization with their own. And there are simply more of them and propaganda works just as well for them.
And there is no need to point to the experience of WWII here - the USSR had both allies and military assistance there.

The only chance to stop all this is to really scare the West with nuclear weapons. All other options are the destruction of the people of Russia, alas ...

[DymOk_v_dYmke]

Quote: Shoulder straps

And there is no need to point to the experience of WWII here - the USSR had both allies and military assistance there.

The main thing that was - the socialist system and the desire of the peoples of the USSR to defend it.

[fax66]

I completely agree. We are marking time, the soldiers are getting tired, the people are getting tired, there are no specific goals, there is no understanding of what we can and what we want (in the sense of the country) ...
All this can lead to bad consequences for the "top" and the country as a whole.

[Adrey]

Have survived ! Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation confuses START and the strategic nuclear doctrine. Or is he specifically trying to mix "flies and cutlets" for the electorate? Like, by virtue of his mental abilities, he hides this?
I don’t understand at all the “throwing caps in the air” about the suspension of START. The treaty limits the number of charges, carriers, launchers (simplified). Does anyone believe that in 6 months we are able to create 1000 new charges, 500 Yars, 500 missile silos, 100 Tu-160 and Tu-95 and 10 Borei?
Then what is all this blah blah blah about?

[donavi49]

So, an explanation has already been issued - we will comply with START3 of our own free will.

Russia vows not to build up nuclear arsenal after suspension of key US treaty

"At the same time, in order to maintain a sufficient degree of predictability and stability in the nuclear missile sphere, Russia intends to adhere to a responsible approach and will continue to strictly comply with the quantitative restrictions on strategic offensive arms stipulated by it within the life cycle of the Treaty.", the Russian Foreign Ministry stressed.

[Adrey]

Quote: donavi49

So, an explanation has already been issued - we will comply with START3 of our own free will.

Then other than cheap farce, it is impossible to characterize this statement! How it looks from the outside is not difficult to guess. The consequences, unfortunately, are also easily predictable.

[Evgenijus]

Out of fear for the impending defeat of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Ukrayinska Pravda today writes: "...According to official Russian data, the Sarmat missile has a range of more than 11 kilometers and can carry a warhead weighing 100 tons." A hundred tons is cool ...

[solar]

Ukrayinska Pravda today writes: "...According to official Russian data, the Sarmat missile has a flight range of more than 11 kilometers

they also write there that she did not fly on yesterday's test launch

[Lt. Air Force stock]

In vain we destroyed chemical weapons, as an option to intimidate the enemy in addition to nuclear weapons.

[Volunteer Marek]

I think it would be nice to resume (ostentatiously) nuclear testing. And don't make it a secret. And, in general, this is all a talking shop, for our internal use. Weak and indecisive - beaten, beaten and will beat.

[Adrey]

Quote: Volunteer Marek

I think it would be nice to resume (ostentatiously) nuclear testing. And don't make it a secret.

It is impossible in principle to keep a secret full-scale tests of a nuclear charge.

[thepuppeteer]

America and Europe are trying to camouflage their financial problems, and their international political failures.
The easiest distraction then is to create fears and enemies first it was the exploitation of COVID and now it is Russia and China
And since everyone has become a social media junkie, it's easy to stir up and manipulate people. Social media has become the most dangerous weapon, as dangerous as an atomic bomb.

[Dilettante grandfather]

1. I have a negative attitude towards Medvedev D.A.
2. He had a chance to do what Putin is doing now: Medvedev was the president of the country. But we all remember how he worked in this post.
3. At the moment, he is engaged in the fact that on his own behalf he voices what the president has already said. Putin, by the way, was much more correct than Medvedev. So what is the value of these statements of Medvedev, who will explain? Personally, I see in them only the search for popularity.

[Rosemary]

Quote: Grandfather is an amateur

So what is the value of these statements by Medvedev, who will explain?

Study of the consequences of long-term ethanol intoxication of the body of former presidents.

[alexey_444]

Finally, we began to hit the Satanists in their weak spots. The Americans are so spoiled that you can approach the walls of Baghdad or Kabul with a bag of money and local princes run from behind the gate knocking down each other with keys that they hammered a bolt into a core. We have already promoted them for hypersound (minus a couple of tens of billions from the military budget), now it’s their turn to spend on nuclear weapons, subject to the agreement, they planned to spend 50 billion, now there will be more accordingly, coupled with spending on the outskirts minus inflation, the military budget will need to be at least increase by 100 billion, which is what we need. Soy on the contrary, hello to Reagan.