Permanent Representative of Russia to the UN: And three hundred Western tanks will not help Ukraine on the battlefield

40
Permanent Representative of Russia to the UN: And three hundred Western tanks will not help Ukraine on the battlefield

Even if Ukraine receives from the West several hundred tanks, this will not lead her to improve the position of the Armed Forces of Ukraine at the front. Vasily Nebenzya, Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the UN and the UN Security Council, expressed this point of view at a meeting of the UN Security Council.

According to Nebenzi, Moscow is well aware that until the Armed Forces of Ukraine are completely defeated, supplies of Western weapons for the Kyiv regime will not stop. However, do they make sense?



As the Russian diplomat notes, three hundred Western tanks will not help Ukraine on the battlefield. After all, since the start of the special military operation, the Russian army has destroyed more than 7,5 thousand Ukrainian tanks - both those that the Armed Forces of Ukraine had before the start of hostilities, and those supplied by the West. Therefore, the new "100, 200 and 300 new tanks will not change the weather," Nebenzia noted.

The Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the UN also noted that Western countries are involved in the events in Ukraine not only because they supply weapons, military equipment and transmit intelligence data to the Kyiv regime.

The West also sends mercenaries and military instructors to Ukraine, because without their help, the Armed Forces of Ukraine simply would not be able to operate technically sophisticated Western weapons.

Maintenance of such equipment can only be carried out by people who really know how to operate it, and this experience is not gained in the five-week courses that Ukrainian military personnel are sent to European training centers.
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -3
    9 February 2023 08: 22
    I agree that this is not an offensive operation in the spirit of the Second World War, the goal is to deplete the enemy's resources. Even in the West, it is increasingly openly recognized that Russia has incomparably greater resources, both technical and human, and will undoubtedly defeat this nationalist entity. NEVER Russia possessing nuclear weapons will lose a single military conflict, is it really not clear that it is NOT POSSIBLE to defeat a country that is guaranteed to destroy anyone !!!
    1. +2
      9 February 2023 08: 27
      The problem is that the story is the opposite of what you say.
      USA - Vietnam and several other conflicts
      USSR - Afghanistan, after collapsed
      Russia is the first Chechen
      South Africa - losing the war in Angola, complete nuclear disarmament
      China - losing the war with Vietnam
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +13
        9 February 2023 09: 50
        Only outright fools believe that the USSR collapsed because of Afghanistan.
    2. +7
      9 February 2023 08: 28
      The problem is that things won't end with 300 tanks. Will bring more. Baiden said that Ukraine would be given as much weapons as needed. The military-industrial complex in the West is gaining momentum, the logistics system is not broken, we will supply raw materials for production and fuel and lubricants ourselves. The use of nuclear weapons requires a strong political will, but it does not exist.
      1. -3
        9 February 2023 08: 32
        The use of nuclear weapons requires a strong political will, but it does not exist.

        there is no need to compare absurdity with political will.
      2. +11
        9 February 2023 08: 38
        Another strategist showed up, Nebenzya.
        No brainer that three hundred tanks for Ukraine is nothing. Three thousand will not fix the situation either, but they will add deaths.
        Nebenzya would be better off doing business: at a meeting of the UN Security Council, he shook test tubes with chemical, bacteriological and radioactive weapons used by the United States and Ukraine in the Donbass. And shake them every day.
        1. +2
          9 February 2023 09: 06
          . Nebenzya would be better off doing business: he shook test tubes with chemical, bacteriological and radioactive weapons at a meeting of the UN Security Council

          It would be better if he broke at least one of them there. At least a small one
    3. -1
      9 February 2023 08: 30
      It's not even about who wins or saves - to help the outskirts! It's all about killing, as many Russians as possible, well, Khokhrakov for one. Khokhryaks are needed for this! And appointed them "exceptional" only for these purposes! Hence the number of supplied weapons.
      1. +3
        9 February 2023 09: 13
        Yes, the West needs to drag out the conflict. Three hundred this year, next year too. Long-range missiles and MLRS, aviation. They need to exhaust us as much as possible.
  2. +2
    9 February 2023 08: 27
    After all, since the start of the special military operation, the Russian army has destroyed more than 7,5 thousand Ukrainian tanks.

    Well, something the Spread lied about 2 times. I remember before the start of the SVO, Ukraine had a total of 1200 tanks in stock and about 1000 more in storage. Suppose about 1000 more (in total) were supplied by the former "fraternal". But all this in a compartment and taking into account the remaining in the ranks, by no means 7,5 thousand destroyed. Perhaps they considered lined and repaired, but still something too much ....
    1. +3
      9 February 2023 09: 13
      Yes, maybe tanks were written in the article instead of the word armored vehicles.
      But this is already do not care. Now the mourners will pick up. You have already stumbled upon one above, which bends about political will and yaos. I wonder who invents nicknames for them. What about yourself? And the plate is not changed. The feeling that you are not talking with a living person, but with a bot
      1. +3
        9 February 2023 09: 35
        Now the mourners will pick up. You have already stumbled upon one above, which bends about political will and yao

        it was the fighters with the regime who mimicked urya-patriots. Now it’s not safe to shout about bad authorities as before, you can later apologize in front of the camera and get an administrative office. Therefore, they chose a win-win method: you write "To win, we must strike with nuclear weapons, but our government is cowardly and incapable!" and now you are no longer the 5th column, but quite a patriot, cheering for victory in the war. And the brainless signer is very greedy for such slogans: "Yes, you have to hit! Burn them in a nuclear fire!" and like overton window accepts the second part of this message - they say "and the government is not capable." And no one cares that any reasonable person will understand that the blow will not be one-sided. It will burn our cities, along with children, women and the elderly.
        A very good psychological technique, I applaud the skill of the developers of manuals for bots. It's not the first time I've seen them.
      2. 0
        9 February 2023 20: 37
        Now the mourners will pick up. You have already stumbled upon one above, which bends about political will and yaos.

        Another influx of cissots ... about nuclear weapons, this is their hit right now. And most importantly, they are not the only ones adding to their messages.
    2. +1
      9 February 2023 10: 54
      Perhaps they considered lined and repaired, but still something too much ...

      This is the key factor. Far from always the tank is torn to pieces.
      Well, yes. Bravura reports must be divided by a certain coefficient. Which one is impossible to say without serious analysis. For example, when the US decided to analyze the effectiveness of troops in the war with Iraq, US intelligence was involved. They almost immediately divided the accounts of the Air Force pilots by 2. The US Department of Defense puffed, but recognized these results.
      1. 0
        9 February 2023 11: 12
        So they still counted, or they just divided it into two and agreed on that what
  3. 0
    9 February 2023 08: 27
    Handsome, he has such a job with ............... talking, he was choosing a word for a long time so that he would not be banned, he could not, I suggest inserting it at your own discretion.
  4. +9
    9 February 2023 08: 28
    And the Armed Forces of Ukraine did not help a few dozen Haymars and long-range howitzers. The Starlinks were also absolutely useless. And artillery radars are generally rubbish. True Kharkov was abandoned for some reason. Well, they scrambled from under Izyum, throwing equipment because the APU never dreamed of. Just 60 km in a couple of weeks. But now we are rapidly advancing at a speed of 1 km per day, and even then not always.
    This Nebezia and his relatives should be settled in Donetsk. Maybe something in the brain will change.
    1. -4
      9 February 2023 09: 16
      Do you also live in Donetsk? Settle Nebenzya nearby? And from there you can see how we drape?
  5. +2
    9 February 2023 08: 31
    It is obvious that Russia is hated by the West precisely for its endless, bottomless, immeasurable military potential, it is too huge to wage an offensive war. As far as Russia was weak economically and strategically, it really never, except for the time of the USSR and a short period, was a superpower on a global scale - its military potential and morale are many times greater.

    This is what has always irritated the West - a regional power that can intervene in any conflict against any force in ANY place on the globe and win.
  6. +2
    9 February 2023 08: 35
    Yes, they will not help, but how many of our children will die? Or the main thing is to grind the Russians! Why do you allow the supply of these weapons? To spit in this shameless face!
    1. -2
      9 February 2023 08: 39
      Better than talking, let him wrap himself with grenades and rush at these tanks.
    2. -1
      9 February 2023 09: 18
      What shameful thing did he say? Before I spit I would like to know
    3. The comment was deleted.
      1. 0
        9 February 2023 09: 50
        Can't detect in browser. Is this directed to me?
        And anyway. Some strange conclusions you have
        . having nothing to be proud of

        . proud of the nation

        . Wretched

        belay
  7. The comment was deleted.
    1. +1
      9 February 2023 08: 47
      A diplomat at the UN has a job - to strive for peace. He is not a military man and cannot know whether the tanks will help or not. .
  8. -3
    9 February 2023 08: 42
    Maybe it's time for our permanent representatives to learn from the Ukrainians - to yell at the UN about how bad everything is with us and how many more lives of servicemen will be taken by the next 100 Nazi tanks. Not in the sense of "pity us", but at least temporarily will not increase supplies
    1. +2
      9 February 2023 09: 20
      Then not only deliveries will increase, but they themselves will rush into battle. Snatch from Russia the most tasty morsel before others do it. To tear us apart, this is their cherished dream
      1. -1
        9 February 2023 09: 38
        Well, if they themselves go, then the turn will come to gasp ...
        And then the permanent representative tells them that 300 tanks are not enough, which means the West will supply 600 tanks ...
  9. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. -2
        9 February 2023 10: 09
        And sofa whiners then where? wassat
        With a beer belly drinks
        Ah... Yes... Here we are hi soldier
    2. -1
      9 February 2023 09: 29
      That's for sure. I think most of them are bots. They sometimes write the same text. In my opinion, they don’t even write, but press copy and paste. The meaning of the article is not important at all. Earthquake in Turkey: why bridges are not destroyed. Nebenzya spoke about the supply of tanks: it's time to use nuclear weapons, but there is no political will, all the children are there.
      - Sentry Nafanya, a chest with fairy tales was komunizdili
  10. +5
    9 February 2023 09: 02
    300 tanks are a serious force. Troubles, deaths and destruction will cause a lot. The question is what fuel will this armada be fueled with? Who makes money on deaths? , then yes, the "pieces of iron" would not help. In the meantime, everything is refueled, serviced, BC is brought up ... We are conducting NWO there. And we are essentially at war with ourselves ...
    1. +2
      9 February 2023 09: 46
      And where does Lukashenka sell fuel from two refineries originally built for export to Europe?
    2. -2
      9 February 2023 10: 14
      . In the meantime, everything is refueled, serviced, bk brought up.

      Oh-oh-oh... Feet. They haven't even arrived yet.
  11. +3
    9 February 2023 09: 26
    In Europe, they don’t understand one thing, that the “conscripted” population of Europe, who grew up and lives in a “blooming backside” (according to the statements of the European emissary Borrell), is no longer morally fit for waging wars, it is only suitable for substituting its blooming backside, go to the women's restroom and put on lipstick. This is not even cannon fodder - this is ready-made minced meat. They, on the very first night of spending the night in a trench, at minus 20 and with constant shelling, will die of fear or surrender to the mercy of the enemy. And who should they call to the front? ... They themselves, in their "blooming ass" raised a generation that, apart from its penis, held nothing else in its hands. And when conducting hostilities with Russia, professional European military men will last no more than half a year. The European Army is not prepared for a protracted war, and SHE was not prepared for this. NATO emmisaries understood perfectly well that Russia had no reason to attack EUROPE, Russia is a self-sufficient country and it does not need anything from Europe. Don't touch Russia! And Russia will answer you the same.
    1. +3
      9 February 2023 09: 48
      When he arrives at a house or apartment, they will put on pants with the fly forward.
    2. +2
      9 February 2023 10: 10
      In Europe, they don’t understand one thing, that the “conscripted” population of Europe, who grew up and lives in a “blooming backside” (according to the statements of the European emissary Borrell), is no longer morally fit for waging wars, it is only suitable for substituting its blooming backside, go to the women's restroom and put on lipstick.

      To a greater extent so, but there are sections of the population that are suitable for indoctrination and use in military operations. Especially for money.
    3. 0
      9 February 2023 10: 17
      . They themselves, in their "blooming ass" raised a generation that, apart from its member, held nothing else in its hands.

      Well, here you are wrong. It seems to me that they not only managed to hold their own
  12. +2
    9 February 2023 09: 26
    300 tanks will not help the Armed Forces of Ukraine, but they will create problems for us for a while.
  13. -1
    9 February 2023 09: 29
    According to Nebenzi, Moscow is well aware that until the Armed Forces of Ukraine are completely defeated, the supply of Western weapons to the Kyiv regime will not stop. However, do they make sense?

    And what is the meaning for us of the WEST'S DESIRE TO KILL RUSSIA?
    What is the meaning of Nazism? What is remarkable about the genocide of mankind by one country, taken separately and self-appointed by the hegemon?
  14. +1
    9 February 2023 12: 06
    Even if Ukraine receives several hundred tanks from the West, this will not lead to an improvement in the position of the Armed Forces of Ukraine at the front. Vasily Nebenzya, Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the UN and the UN Security Council, expressed this point of view at a meeting of the UN Security Council.

    But Nebenzya didn’t count how many lives of Russian soldiers these several hundred tanks could take? It is quite comfortable and easy for him to talk about new tanks, aircraft at meetings at the UN ... Well, this is not in a trench! How did all this talking shop got it. I would take an example from the amers - there Powell shook a test tube at the UN and Iraq - DISAPPEARED!
  15. 0
    9 February 2023 12: 16
    They won't affect you much, but they can drink blood. God forbid that someone did not have to tear it along with them hi