Kurganmashzavod supplied the Ministry of Defense with a batch of new infantry fighting vehicles BMP-3

The first batch of infantry fighting vehicles BMP-3 this year was delivered to the military, the shipment of armored vehicles was made by Kurganmashzavod. This was reported by the press service of Rostec.

A large batch of infantry fighting vehicles was transferred to the Ministry of Defense, the equipment was sent by rail. According to the state corporation, BMP-3s were transferred as part of this year's state defense order. In addition to the new BMP-3s, this year the company will also supply airborne BTR-MDM "Shell" to the troops, as well as other military equipment that has undergone a major overhaul.

BMP-3 manufactured at Kurganmashzavod are equipped with the main sight of the gunner-operator "Sodema" and additional protection kits - armored screens and gratings

- said in a statement.

Currently, Kurganmashzavod operates around the clock, manufacturing armored vehicles necessary for a special military operation. The company is recruiting new employees to fulfill the state defense order. Earlier it was reported that the infantry fighting vehicle BMP-3 was upgraded to improve performance characteristics. As part of this modernization, the BMP received an active protection complex and hinged dynamic armor, the firepower of the BMP was increased due to the introduction of precision-guided munitions and a modern software and hardware complex into its ammunition load.

The BMP-3M infantry fighting vehicle is armed with a 100mm gun - a 2A70 launcher with a 30mm 2A72 automatic cannon and a 7,62mm PKTM machine gun. BMP is designed to transport personnel to the front line, increase the mobility, armament and security of military personnel on the battlefield in conditions of the use of nuclear weapons and joint action with tanks in battle.

Comments

[Machito]

God loves big battalions. (C) Napoleon
In the current situation, military-industrial complex enterprises need to work 72 hours a day to ensure the victory of the RF Armed Forces on the battlefield.

[dmi.pris1]

We have one plant engaged in the production of infantry fighting vehicles. More precisely, assembly, there are a lot of subcontractors. If it weren’t for stocks of equipment from storage, I don’t think that one plant will be able to compensate for losses. The situation is similar with aviation. -bombers, coupled with attack aircraft?

[voice of reason]

specifically in the NMD, attack aircraft did not prove to be a decisive force. Cannon artillery and tanks play the main violin. In terms of tank factories, everything is in order with us, as well as in the production of tanks, but what about the barrel?

[dmi.pris1]

The barrel and MLRS are made in Perm at the Motovilinsky factories. Here, too, it’s like a thin link. But I think that production in the Sverdlovsk region can help.

[Paul Siebert]

Quote from: dmi.pris1

The barrel and MLRS are made in Perm at the Motovilinsky factories.

Motovilikhinsky plants, Dima...
Don't hate perm.
On the eve of the SVO, this enterprise was in the stage of bankruptcy.
It would not be bad to conduct an extended audit of the plants and understand the reasons for their such state. Find the guilty and understand what their gesheft was ...
I do not believe in the unprofessionalism of the management of the enterprise, founded under Peter the Great!
Change smells...

[PSih2097]

Quote: Paul Siebert

Find the guilty and understand what their gesheft was ...

And why look for something, all the personalities are in plain sight - the directorate (due to the overestimation of the price tag for components and various services) with the help of subsidiaries of relatives and friends; RosTech by lobbying orders through the Moscow region; well, and banks with the help of loans (Yu. Latynina wrote well about this in her books). Schemes for pumping money are common ...

Quote: Paul Siebert

It would not be bad to conduct an extended audit of the plants and understand the reasons for their such state.

not bad, but whoever allows it, and if it does, then there will be no consequences, so they will reproach and everything will go according to the knurled ...

[Sergey Aleksandrovich]

It is not thieving directors and relatives that destroy production capacity, but property taxes.

[Stas157]

Quote: voice of reason

specifically in NWO assault aviation did not prove to be a decisive force

Which showed?

[novel66]

None, with the air defense of the Ukrainians not closed, there is no chance of successful work

[lucul]

aviation did not prove to be a decisive force.

Because the APU is hiding behind civilians. And we do not have high-precision bombs (+/- 1m), so they take care of civilians. In the event that the war is transferred to Poland / the Baltic states, no one will take care of civilians, then aviation will open in full force.

[paul3390]

specifically in the NMD, ground attack aircraft did not prove to be a decisive force

At the cost of a modern aircraft or helicopter, losses that were considered minimal in previous wars, well, or quite acceptable, will be perceived as a national catastrophe .. Plus - production rates at which timely replenishment is virtually impossible .. That is - in fact, you can only count on for pre-war stocks.

Compare, for example, the loss of 10 IL-2s during an attack on, say, a bridge. Sad - but quite common. In a month, the assault regiment will again be at full strength .. And now - the loss of, for example, 10 Su-34s .. Now this is a complete attack ..

Very effective modern air defense is superimposed on this. Which, as it turned out, is extremely difficult to suppress - at least something remains, and this something still poses a serious danger.

Thus, the aviation of the battlefield practically switched to the position of the battleships of the times of the First World War. They are, and represent a formidable force - which the command is extremely afraid to use under the threat of losses that will mean losing the war.

[Stas157]

Quote: paul3390

At the cost of a modern aircraft or helicopter, losses that were considered minimal in previous wars, well, or quite acceptable, will be perceived as national disaster.

The Banderaites have already lost all their aircraft ten times and are not worried.
And I would really like to know when Kanashenkov will inflict really unacceptable losses on them so that they are not heard of?

[topol717]

Quote: Stas157

The Banderaites have already lost all their aircraft ten times and are not worried.
And I would really like to know when Kanashenkov will inflict really unacceptable losses on them so that they are not heard of?

The whole of Europe repairs and supplies them. and even with such a "limitless budget" recently there have been few aircraft.

[paul3390]

Firstly, it was not aviation. From the very beginning it was obvious that she could not play any role in principle. Not that level. Compared to ours. As a result, it apparently was not taken into account in the plans for the war. The aviation of the ukrovermacht hardly expected to storm our orders, and since we did not use our own, the fighters also turned out to be useless. Although, of course, they didn’t have much light either ... The bet was made specifically on mobile military air defense. Even if it's outdated. And as practice has shown - successful. We have not been able to completely suppress air defense, and even single complexes are very dangerous.

By the way, this is a good bell for NATO, which historically relies precisely on the power of its aviation. Since Russian air defense, glory to the Soviet Union, is ahead of the rest, it certainly cannot be suppressed. And Westerners like to lose expensive planes no more than ours ..

Secondly, they got it for free, and a freebie is not appreciated. How many letaks did they have in 1991? What about 2023? Here..

[dmi.pris1]

You are talking about our air defense of that .... An example of Belgorod, Ryazan, Engels, etc. .... Ideal air defense does not exist. Moreover, the country's territory is huge and it is impossible to cover everything and everywhere. But in rather limited territories, in the same Ukraine, Europe, this is quite feasible with sufficient saturation with object air defense. Although, it is possible to break through a certainty, which is shown by the strikes of our forces

[paul3390]

What does the ideal air defense have to do with it ?? The question is not that it cannot be penetrated, but that it cannot be suppressed to such an extent as to secure clear skies. But only under such conditions is modern NATO aviation capable of operating. Losses comparable at least with the Vietnamese - she definitely will not endure. However, like ours.

[VladMirU]

That is the strategy of the minds of the General Staff. Those. we have aviation, but it seems to be non-existent. Like gophers ..... But the problem is further ..... they don’t want to think further. And enemy air defense is not able to destroy. Here they sailed. Either the army, or a private office ....

[Sebostyuan]

Maybe it's time to stop justifying the inaction of the Aerospace Forces with the presence of air defense. No one is suggesting to strike in depth any more. At least the front-line railway stations were bombed. At the time of unloading trains. For this, planning bombs and tactical missiles were invented. Of course, if during the defeat of the target it is necessary to fly over it, then there will not be enough aviation.

[withoutreverse]

This is good news in the morning. And the coffee seemed delicious.

[maiman61]

For Western Satanists, the situation is even worse! Compared to them, we are great!

[Fizik13]

Quote from: dmi.pris1

We have one plant engaged in the production of infantry fighting vehicles ....... one plant will be able to compensate for losses. The situation is similar with aviation .......

We have a lot of equipment in storage.
The equipment coming from storage first of all undergoes a major overhaul and modernization to the currently existing standards, and only then goes to the troops.
The head factories first of all produce new equipment, and then they load their capacities with the restoration of old equipment. In addition to the head plants, we have many repair plants, and they carry out major repairs and modernization of equipment that has not only been damaged during operation, but also that which has been removed from storage.

[Machito]

In Moscow, almost all "mailboxes" and factories were ruined. There is no place to make weapons, and no one. Near my dacha in Povarovo, the Mercedes plant has been idle for almost a year. An excellent plant for the modernization of infantry fighting vehicles.

[Ivan Ivanov]

Yes, given the scale of the conflict, we need more factories and factories of the allies, ideally.

[avg]

On September 5, Mishustin signed an order on the construction of two tank repair plants, + several are being taken away from Rostec and restored + father promised to transfer the plant 140 completely to the defense industry. It remains to be hoped that they correctly calculated the possibilities and meet the deadlines, and there is enough equipment in storage.

[maiman61]

Justice is on the side of the big battalions! (C) Napoleon.

[dmi.pris1]

Do you even know that the number of units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine still exceeds ours? Why is this old expression?

[voice of reason]

BMP-3 is currently our best BMP on combat duty. There would be more dragoons in the layout, and in addition to them there would be more BRM-3 "lynxes" they immediately have reconnaissance devices integrated ....

[Bingo]

In general, as for me, matalygs were exported most of all in the Donbass
Ninay, I didn’t see the BMP-3 at work, but it’s all the same, I think even now these “fighters of the invisible front” (well, I haven’t seen laudatory articles about MT-LB) one dog plows more than all other armor together

[aszzz888]

Bingo
Today, 08: 27
NEW

+3
In general, as for me, in the Donbass, the wink matalygs were most of all exported ..

This car should be erected monuments everywhere!

[lucul]

This car should be erected monuments everywhere!

Not to her, but to her designer, a monument should be erected, because he knew Zen.
MT-LB is a one-piece apparatus, there is nothing superfluous in it, a brilliant engineering project.

[Nexcom]

it is possible to protect the crew with an internal armored capsule. if you normally rework an existing project. it's not a cut. there were also ideas to install a more powerful engine - to increase subversion and maneuverability. but no one needs it...

[maiman61]

Modules "Manul" are urgently needed with an automatic 57 mm. cannon based on the BMP-3.

[Kuziming]

Finally! You are on the right path, comrades!

[Nikolaevich I]

There were reports that Kurganmashzavod delivered the first BMP-3s with hinged dynamic protection (DZ) back in November last year! BMP and DZ! Finally! It's done! (Nothing was heard about KAZs ...) But, for some reason, such an event passed, somehow, unnoticed! There was no corresponding article on VO and other mentions "on the occasion"! Although there were plenty of moans about the lack of remote sensing on the BMP! (I even considered the "November message" a disinformation and also kept silent ...) Still, it turns out some kind of "one-sided" awareness in VO!

[Sergey Aleksandrovich]

The photo does not show anti-cumulative, and now anti-drone gratings. Kamikaze drones are the main threat already.

[core]

you offer to drag explosives across the country on armor, dz for infantry fighting vehicles seems to be mounted, apparently they are being transported separately

[alexmach]

In the above video and photo, there are no mounts on the case for either remote sensing or other protective screens. "Naked" these infantry fighting vehicles.

[Bad_gr]

Quote: alexmach

In the above video and photo, there are no mounts on the case for either remote sensing or other protective screens. "Naked" these infantry fighting vehicles.

It is difficult to judge from the video and photo in the article about the supplied equipment, since it is not a fact that they are from the same event. The article writes about the supply of BMP-3M, but it is somewhat different than in the video. Firstly, hinged armor based on the defense of the Kurganets, a turret like that of the BMD-4M (that is, with a panorama for the commander), the engine should not be UTD-29, but UTD-32 with 640 horses, well, little things.
PS
On TV they showed the training of our fighters before being sent to Ukraine, and so, they trained on BMP-3M, such as I described.
BM BMD-4M

[alexmach]

If the photos and videos are relevant, then there are even additional screens, or mounts for them are not visible, not like remote sensing.

[Beetle1991]

As part of this modernization, the BMP received an active protection complex and hinged dynamic armor,

Something about the active protection complex is completely unbelievable. Well, I DON'T BELIEVE IT.
not on tanks, but here they put it on a behu.
There may be dynamic protection, but not KAZ.
Not the arena, let alone the Afghan.
Most likely, infrared sensors were installed that detect the rocket torch / laser irradiation, giving a signal to fire smoke grenades. No more. And that's not a fact.

[cold wind]

Quote: Beetle1991

Most likely, infrared sensors were installed that detect the rocket torch / laser irradiation, giving a signal to fire smoke grenades

This is called active protection. Question of wording.

[Plover]

This is also KAZ. If the offline system can deliver an aerosol cloud - that's very cool

[Xenofont]

KAZ generally sounds like a mystic! How many decades the Defense Ministry opposed the installation of this system even on heavy armored vehicles, and here it is! Looks like someone was pinched on "dignity" and funds were spent not on any dregs, but on the real protection of the fighters. But this is not accurate, because the voiced intentions can easily be trampled on by a stupid and greedy bureaucracy!

[svp67]

A new batch of new cars is great, but how new are they? And will they protect the infantry with their armor or will they force them to ride "on armor" again? I think they will force them ... No matter how difficult it is now, but we need to work for the future and modernize production for the production of at least BMP-3M

[voice of reason]

No one forces you to ride armor! This is a conscious choice of any normal infantryman, on the LBS, if he does not want to be shell-shocked or burn out when a combat vehicle is hit. Another question is that more "open top" armored personnel carriers are needed. All the same, infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers were planned at one time as a battlefield support vehicle, and based on these considerations, they were designed. With modern anti-tank weapons, and the saturation of enemy infantry with them, given the current situation at the forefront in general, it would not be out of place to start production of armored combat vehicles in the layout of something like a "gunnomag" or the Soviet armored personnel carrier BTR-60P

[Sergey Aleksandrovich]

The unfortunate design of hatches on the roof of armored vehicles makes you ride on armor.

[cold wind]

Quote: svp67

No matter how difficult it is now, but we need to work for the future and modernize production for the production of at least BMP-3M

The question is extremely important. We need infantry fighting vehicles that can bring the infantry to the enemy in integrity. BMP-3 does not provide this. It is rather a light tank and the landing force is located there according to the "tank" in real conditions.

[Old_wars]

The only way to take our infantry off the armor is to put armor plates like the German IGEL (hedgehog) on ​​the roof, or finally start converting the existing T-55s into the BTR-T, in all other cases they will ride on the armor, because there is a chance to see a flying ATGM the car is expensive. Unfortunately, we do not have a single infantry fighting vehicle or armored personnel carrier capable of withstanding even a simple RPG-7 shot. By the way, it’s a very interesting fact that it’s not the cumulative jet itself that brings the most victims, but the explosion of the BC.

[Boris Ivanov]

Everything for the front! everything to win! - the cry of our grandfathers. let's repeat!

[dmi.pris1]

This will require a complete transfer of industry and the entire economy to a military footing .. And we don’t have a war, damn it ..

[epicurean]

And why don’t we hang gratings and sandbags on equipment? On the equipment that America supplies with Europe for Ukraine, all this is present, and they say it helps and saves a lot.

[alexmach]

Sandbags are already trash, but there are serial sets of additional protection for all infantry fighting vehicles. And why they are not massively equipped with equipment is a very good question. If the video from the BMP is relevant, then it is very, very unfortunate that without a "body kit".

[air wolf]

BMP-3 and all our tanks need a drone for reconnaissance and target designation, and so the war is going on like in 41, the commander saw a shot, there is even no other targeting from UAVs. You need a tactical tablet!

[cold wind]

BMP-3 and all our tanks need a drone for reconnaissance and target designation

On the new CV90 it is.
https://youtu.be/nb-EuRy_hnM

[Plover]

For 10 years now, an automatic target designation system has been needed, when the on-board systems themselves are looking for, they themselves direct and track the defeat themselves. For a person, only confirmation of the priority of goals. Manual mode in modern warfare should be an emergency

[Hagakure]

Quote from: dmi.pris1

We have one plant engaged in the production of infantry fighting vehicles. More precisely, assembly, there are a lot of subcontractors. If it weren’t for stocks of equipment from storage, I don’t think that one plant will be able to compensate for losses

In total, according to Wiki's pre-war data, 600 BMP-3 units were produced. There aren't many in storage. Well, this pratia is most likely not new, but simply underwent modernization. The capacities there at the Uralvagon plant are small, as well as everywhere else in the world. Now in the post-industrial era, heavy equipment is more like a miracle on the battlefield. There is not enough capacity, so they switch to light rifle formations. Vladlen Tatarsky announced that gunners without artillery and tankers without tanks were sent to the front in the form of units newly formed from Russian mobiles. In Ukraine, too, half of the units are terbats with a maximum of 82 mortars in the state. Everything in the world was cut by defense factories. No power. Hence, there is little new technology. In the short term, this situation will only worsen. Despite the bravura Ukrainian statements about the supposedly trophy of as many as 400 Russian tanks during the Kharkov regrouping, Ukraine is crying and demanding tanks from the world a string. Even one Leo who entered is a real holiday in the media.

[Plover]

I think that not a single BMP-3 is in storage. After all, at the end of 2021 there was news that in parts they were changing regular BMP-1s to BMP-1AMs. No one will give away the top three for storage in such conditions.

[Constantine N]

The new high-precision bombs fire at 150km and have an accuracy of 1m. How will armored vehicles survive against such weapons?

[maiman61]

The territory is considered occupied only when the foot of an infantryman sets foot on this land! This is an axiom. And the foot of an infantryman will not be able to set foot on this earth without armor cover! This is also an axiom.

[Roma 1977]

Very simple. Planning bombs are guided by satellite coordinates. The tank moves a hundred meters to the side and looks at the fireworks from the side.

[poquello]

Quote: Roma-1977

Very simple. Planning bombs are guided by satellite coordinates. The tank moves a hundred meters to the side and looks at the fireworks from the side.

this is not fair, then how will precision glide bombs hit the tanks?

[Roma 1977]

20 pieces a month is not much. Although 240 per year ...

[VB]

How much is produced per day? Also tanks and planes and helicopters? Why does air defense of the outskirts still exist? Where are the sabotage and reconnaissance groups on enemy territory? Rail War? Why do any planes fly over the outskirts and trains run? Where is our aviation? Worth the price of such a cover. They will be supplied with long-range missiles and planning bombs, the destruction of our cities, infrastructure, warehouses and troops will increase significantly. They will deliver without any problems. Russia has never seen such a total betrayal in its entire history. Glory to the Supreme Commander!

[voice of reason]

How much is produced per day is information that is a state secret.
- Air defense is dangerous for a fighter-bomber (according to our classification or an attack aircraft according to NATO), including MANPADS. Do you know at least a purely theoretical way to deprive the enemy of MANPADS?
-in the conditions of NWO, sending DRGs to the enemy is like shooting them right away. if you want, you can do it yourself, on a personal basis - an activity suitable for suicides
-rail warfare was also ineffective in the Second World War (then only the destruction of the maneuvering staff had an effect), is it not necessary to talk about the bridge?
-Where do you see mass flights in the former Ukraine? or do you propose to shoot down from the Belgorod region what flies over Lviv? Is one provocation with a Malaysian Boeing not enough for you? still want to submit?
- Our aviation has been working every day since the first day of the NMD, with insufficient efficiency due to the presence of enemy air defense.
0 trains run because it is almost impossible to destroy the rail network - trains also ran in Germany at 45. Well, do you think England and America and the USSR bombed Germany a little?
I haven't seen such hysteria as yours in a long time. And most importantly, it's all wrong. some provocations and stuffing.

[dmi.pris1]

You are not talking about that. Where was our propaganda, where they drowned for our lives, for Russia in the post-Soviet republics? Therefore, there are no partisans and saboteurs.

[Vadim Topal Pasha]

Seems like a good thing they're doing. But it's bad that it is the BMP-3. Still, protection, in principle, is insufficient and it has long been necessary to switch to more seriously armored vehicles. Even if it turns out to be more expensive (which is not a fact, but when using the hulls of ancient tanks, it is nonsense), there will still be savings. And on lives and on repairs and on the construction of new ones to replace those destroyed. Well, you should not forget about the BMPT. Only Algeria successfully operates more than 300 pieces and there are no losses.

[Vadim Topal Pasha]

Quote: maiman61

The territory is considered occupied only when the foot of an infantryman sets foot on this land! This is an axiom. And the foot of an infantryman will not be able to set foot on this earth without armor cover! This is also an axiom.

Actually, in the original, "when the eggs of an infantryman hung over an enemy trench" (C) And the second "axiom" is not even a theorem, but complete nonsense.

[certero]

The news is good, but where is at least one active protection system on our tanks

[nsws3]

On the one hand, in the current situation, equipment should go in echelons, but effective managers do not want to miss their profit, on the other hand, crew training should be. Now the defense industry is working to make up for the losses of equipment, but to build up, they don’t even stutter about it, because as it will be: the decoding of the Soviet quality mark: "That's it, I can't do it anymore."

[yho]

All these BMPs have long been morally obsolete. To win, you need to invent something fundamentally new.