Former British Prime Minister Johnson called on the United States to transfer aircraft and long-range artillery to Ukraine

The United States should arrange for the transfer of aircraft and artillery to Ukraine, adapted to fire as far as possible from the location of the systems themselves. This was stated by former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson.

According to Johnson, Ukraine should receive any weaponwhich she wants. The politician called the "victory of Ukraine" a way to restore the global economy. He also stated that the defeat of Russia was of vital interest to the entire Western world.

Boris Johnson is known for his Russophobic sentiments. He is a frequent visitor to Kyiv, and he comes to Ukraine even after leaving the post of head of the British government. However, not all politicians and experts in the West are as optimistic about Ukraine's victory.

As a result of a special military operation of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, Ukraine suffered very serious economic damage, large demographic losses, which consist not only in the death of military personnel, but also in the departure of millions of able-bodied citizens from the country, including women with small children. Therefore, it would be very strange to talk about the "victory" of Ukraine in such a situation.

But Johnson and his like "hawks" are not interested in the real losses of Ukraine and the lives of Ukrainian citizens, their task is to cause maximum harm to Russia, and it does not matter at all at what cost. Peace and stability in Europe and Ukraine in particular are threatened by such anti-Russian politicians.

Comments

[voice of reason]

That means we have let Medvedev, for example, declare that he personally speaks to the supreme commander in chief for a nuclear strike on London. And there they will not inflict, the question is still open.

[nickname7]

for a nuclear attack on London

God be afraid to write this. The rich and bureaucrats live there.

[blackGRAIL]

Yes, that's not the point. All this couch talk about getting lucky in London or Washington is utter nonsense. A nuclear strike by one nuclear power on the mother territory of another nuclear power is guaranteed to cause an illogical retaliatory strike (while the missiles of the first are still in the air). Let's launch a rocket at London and get a rocket at Moscow in response. Let's start by (conditional) Glasgow and get by (conditional) Yekaterinburg. The use of nuclear weapons is possible only on the territory of third countries - for example, tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of a logistics center in Poland will not cause a retaliatory nuclear attack on the territory of Russia, despite any NATO statements. And a NATO attack on Belarus will not lead to a nuclear strike on a NATO nuclear country (but on Poland, for example).

[Skeptic3]

I have a different prognosis:

Any use of nuclear weapons is a complete trade blockade of the Russian Federation (including from the East), the announcement of a no-fly zone over Ukraine within the borders of 1991, massive strikes by NATO forces against the Russian Armed Forces on the territory of Ukraine in order to quickly and completely defeat.

What objections will you have?

[opuonmed]

Any use of nuclear weapons is a complete trade blockade of the Russian Federation

there will be 100% of the current those countries that subscribe to it!

declaration of a no-fly zone over Ukraine within the borders of 1991, massive attacks by NATO forces on the Russian Armed Forces on the territory of Ukraine in order to quickly and completely defeat.

if it doesn’t, it will lead to a clash with NATO, that is, a nuclear war, the end of humanity! Ukraine is not a NATO country, that is, there will be no nuclear war even if the Russian Federation uses nuclear weapons there! it is beneficial for the United States to support the stove in order to weaken the Russian Federation, but for now, the United States themselves are riveting hypersound!

[Skeptic3]

this will lead to clashes with NATO, that is, a nuclear war, the end of humanity

No, it won't. Unless, of course, martyrs are sitting in the Kremlin.

In my forecast, there is neither the use of nuclear weapons, nor strikes on the internationally recognized territory of the Russian Federation. There will be absolutely no legal basis for the use of nuclear weapons against NATO.

[opuonmed]

No, it won't. Unless, of course, martyrs are sitting in the Kremlin.

massive strikes by NATO forces on the Russian Armed Forces

NATO is not when this does not go! it will lead to nuclear war! NATO is not a martyr to destroy Europe and the United States and the globe from Ukraine!

[Skeptic3]

it will lead to nuclear war

No, it won't. No reason.

[opuonmed]

Quote: Skeptik3

No, it won't. No reason.

massive strikes by NATO forces on the Russian Armed Forces

this is not the basis for a nuclear war?

[Skeptic3]

this is not the basis for a nuclear war?

No, this is not a reason.
The reason may be a massive invasion by conventional forces into the territory of the Russian Federation or the use of nuclear weapons on the territory of the Russian Federation. There can be no other reason.

[opuonmed]

Well, that's your opinion! everything changes in our life and doctrine!!!!! a NATO strike on the forces of the Russian Federation can be recognized as a threat to the integrity of the Russian Federation and a threat to statehood, and a nuclear war will first be a tactical stalemate higher and higher!
I know that the United States can hit with a nuclear wherever they want!

[Osipov9391]

Austin already warned Shoigu about this by phone.
And NATO Secretary General spoke.
That their answer will not be nuclear and very tough.

Everything was calculated with us too - the remnants of the Black Sea Fleet will be defeated in a couple of hours, our entire grouping in a couple of days on the territory of the LDNR and in the Crimea.

On the basis of a UN decision, where Russia will immediately be kicked out for violating an addendum to the NPT.

[solar]

What objections can there be? There is a special agreement between the nuclear powers, as an annex to the NPT, on the non-use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear states.
Violation of it in one moment will destroy the NPT, and very quickly dozens of countries will acquire nuclear weapons, and this will devalue the nuclear arsenals of nuclear powers. Do they need it? Does China also need Japan and South Korea to become nuclear states? And this will happen in a maximum of five years, or even faster, they are technologically ready, like many others.

[opuonmed]

conventional missiles to ordinary countries of the Russian Federation and the United States and China hypersound) oh yes, the maintenance of nuclear weapons is not a cheap pleasure! the usa usa transports everything to itself the factories of europe and the technology of taiwan)))) although we are only building theories here, but who knows what will actually happen))

[Osipov9391]

Agree. The NPT of 1968 is the cornerstone of all world security.
If one of the nuclear powers violates this treaty, that same stone will crack.

North Korea can launch a nuclear strike on South Korea knowing that nothing will come of it.
Iran will launch a nuclear strike on Israel knowing that nothing will happen.
China will launch a nuclear strike on Taiwan knowing that nothing will happen.

And several dozen other countries will also make it and try to solve their territorial problems with their neighbors with its help.

Who needs this? States? Globalists?
So that the world was chaos and chaos.
Nobody needs.

[Osipov9391]

And what does that London have to answer?

4 SSBNs with 16 silos each. And let each SLBM not have 10 charges, but 4-6.
Let there be not 16 Tridents on patrolling submarines, but 11-12 each, as the media write.

What happens? Approximately 60-80 charges on one submarine.
Here.
And you can take into account that 2 such submarines, or even 3, are always in the waters of the North Sea.

24-28 rockets, and more than a hundred charges can be launched in response to the European part of Russia.
Even Moscow's missile defense system will not withstand such an attack.

[opuonmed]

in a house and the world is born, well, that's me) and Europe and the United States will withstand the nuclear response of the Russian Federation?

[Osipov9391]

Will survive. Thousands of military facilities around the world that will have to be destroyed and preferably immediately.
They will take the brunt of it.

[opuonmed]

the population of Europe and the United States will receive a kerdyk in the current case)

[Luka Nord]

Former British Prime Minister Johnson called on the United States to transfer aircraft and long-range artillery to Ukraine

Zelensky apparently borrowed money from US aid to Johnson .. So the cockerel sang .. This devil has a lot of debts, there was inf .. He loves to walk and sniff too.

[Mikhail Drabkin]

Why do we need a world in which there is no Russia ...

— How many Russians will sign these words? These words are not a manifestation of political will.

— We'll have to fight without the use of nuclear weapons. It will be a difficult war, but it can become both People's and Patriotic. And not only on the territory of the Crimea and the Four New Regions of Russia.

—- And the hat-shaking has long been out of place.

[tihonmarine]

According to Johnson, Ukraine should get any weapon it wants.

And what it will lead to, Boris, as always, blurted out without thinking. Forgetting that Britain is small in area, and Doomsday is very large.

[Skeptic3]

You meditate on nuclear weapons like a schoolboy meditating on a movie poster. When you really want to but can't
Is this your last hope now? All the other polymers, in your opinion, have already fallen in love?

[tihonmarine]

Quote: Skeptik3

You meditate on nuclear weapons like a schoolboy meditating on a movie poster.

You have only one "meditation" on your mind, why do Jews have such unconventional thinking.

[Luka Nord]

Quote: tihonmarine

According to Johnson, Ukraine should get any weapon it wants.

And what it will lead to, Boris, as always, blurted out without thinking. Forgetting that Britain is small in area, and Doomsday is very large.

Yes, he doesn’t think anything, you see the same cocaine addict as Zelensky Too often dangles to Kyiv and the money is taken out by "US aid"

[blackGRAIL]

Sofa talk about striking London or Washington is utter nonsense. A nuclear strike by one nuclear power on the mother territory of another nuclear power is guaranteed to provoke an illogical retaliatory strike while the missiles of the first are still in the air. A rocket launch on London will lead to a rocket launch on Moscow. Which, by the way, has already been answered in London: it takes up to 20 minutes to make a decision on the return launch of the Trident SSBN. Therefore, no one is afraid of a nuclear strike either in London or in Washington.

[Osipov9391]

That's right - I wrote above.
Considering the fact that 2 submarines with Tridents are always in the North Sea. And then 3.
And they can instantly cover the entire European part of Russia with flat strikes in 12-15 minutes of flying time.

[K-50]

Former British Prime Minister Johnson called on the United States to transfer aircraft and long-range artillery to Ukraine

You can call for anything, knowing that you will not get anything for it, because the responsibility is not on you. They won’t put you on a stake for calls, and even in the face, in a simple way, they won’t let you.

[Andron78]

What else to expect from him, he is sure that planes are like flies ... where they want to sit, where they want to fly, and eat everything they can sit on.

[Tusv]

That's what gentlemen imperialists. We are not slaves, we are not slaves. Or do you still think that Russian Vanka for a billion of gypsy gold will plow for grub and glass beads? First you need to return the dollar to the gold standard. And so, sorry. The digital ruble began to work with reference to the despicable metal

[Ulan.1812]

Is this homeless guy blathering something? Will never calm down.

[Serge9901]

"Possible deliveries of longer-range American missiles to Ukraine will not change the course of the special operation, it will be continued," Dmitry Peskov, press secretary of the President of the Russian Federation, said. Maybe it's time to start evacuating the Crimea? In order not to repeat the Kherson running around. If Simferopol is made the second Donetsk, it will be completely sour.

[Tusv]

As for the planes. England sold Typhoon to Austria for 139 mega euros. "Oh, what a scandal." Weak "Free of charge, that is, dadom" to transfer this to Ukraine bypassing 139 mega euros of profit per bird? Or, after all, the States should pay for everything? And they will pay in full.

[Osipov9391]

And what such scandal could be?
"Eurofighter" is quite tolerable and modern fighter.
On the world market, success is no worse than the Su-30.
NATO countries and rich Arab countries buy such equipment for themselves, they can afford it.
He has a very advanced radar and electronics.

[Alex242]

But Johnson and his like "hawks" are not interested in the real losses of Ukraine and the lives of Ukrainian citizens, their task is to cause maximum harm to Russia, and it does not matter at all at what cost.

we don’t expect anything else from the shaves ....

[1razvgod]

And johnsonyuk does not want to put his carcass in the trenches 404?

[tolmachiev51]

Somehow they got used to it, with the status of ex. gay comrades are getting smarter sharply !!! Shaggy has a problem with this, apparently by nature a weak-minded clinic.

[1erWahrheitsMinister_1984]

Quote: Skeptik3

Es wird absolut keine Rechtsgrundlage für den Einsatz von Atomwaffen gegen die NATO geben.

Blödsinn, es gibt weder historisch noch tatsächlich auch nur den
Geringsten Zweifel daran, dass Russland das Recht hat, auf die
Kriegshandlungen der NATO - um deren Kämpfer und
deren Waffen geht es doch hier nahezu ausschließlich - mit
atomarer Gegenwehr zu reagieren; auch bereits early in the day
derzeitigen, gesetzlich aktualisierten Regeln in Russland!

Nenn Sie mir auch nur EIN EINZIGES Beispiel aus der
Geschichte, wo bei vergleichbaren Handlungen einer
Kriegspartei wie der EU und der NATO nicht sofort der
Krieg erklärt worden wäre?!!

Nein, auch wenn man sich in Moskau immer noch zurückhält,
gibt es doch mittlerweile ernsthafte Überlegungen den Einsatz
von Atomaren Schlägen ins Kalkül zu ziehen um die Drohung
noch glaubhaft aufrecht zu erhalten...!! Was soll denn noch
alles passieren, damit ein solches Szenario gerechtfertigt wäre?!?

https://military.pravda.ru/1792273-specoperaciya/