Western press: The White House is considering the possibility of supplying Ukraine with GLSDB - ammunition with a range of up to 150 km

February 1 2023 60

Another “red line” could be crossed by the US administration with a new package of military aid to Ukraine. While a group of auditors began working in Kyiv to find out how targeted were the spending of financial aid delivered by the United States to Ukraine, publications appeared in the Western press that the White House could also include missiles with a range of up to 150 km in the new military aid package. The publication was made by the information service Reuters.

The material indicates that we are talking about such weapons as the GLSDB - Ground Launched Small Diameter Bomb (ground-based small diameter bomb). Their launches can be carried out from various platforms, including the American HIMARS universal rocket launchers that Ukraine has. A bomb (rocket) can change its trajectory in flight. At the same time, the target itself can be found at any angle (up to 360 degrees) from the place and direction of the launch, according to the manufacturers.

The GLSDB could reportedly be part of a US$2,2 billion military aid package.

At the moment, the longest-range weapons supplied to the Kyiv regime are GMLRS. This radius does not exceed 80 km. The supply of GLSDB actually doubles the range of hitting targets.

If such missiles are received, the Armed Forces of Ukraine will be able to deliver missile strikes deep into the territory of Russia, including in the north of Crimea, as well as, for example, in Belgorod, the suburbs of Kursk.

However, the same Western news agency adds that while the US administration has not made a final decision on missiles with a range of up to 150 km, the issue is being considered by it. But Kyiv continues to demand from its sponsors and this weapon including.

Rumors that the US may supply GLSDB to Ukraine have been circulating since last year. So far, the White House has refrained from such supplies.

Western animation, which was actively posted by Ukrainians:

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

YOUR

+9

1 February 2023 06: 09

They are shelling the territory of Russia every day - Bryansk region, Kursk region, Belgorod region, Voronezh region, Rostov region, Krasnodar region, Republic of Crimea. As long as the border areas receive such shells, they will fire even further.
1. Aaron Zawi
  
  -2
  
  1 February 2023 07: 31
  
  Quote: YOUR
  They are shelling the territory of Russia every day - Bryansk region, Kursk region, Belgorod region, Voronezh region, Rostov region, Krasnodar region, Republic of Crimea. As long as the border areas receive such shells, they will fire even further.
  
  Well, you carry them all the way to Lvov and the Carpathians. War.
  1. YOUR
    
    +4
    
    1 February 2023 07: 39
    
    With your weapon. They will be American.
2. Argon
  
  +3
  
  1 February 2023 08: 07
  
  I'm interested in the terminology "red lines". What does this mean? If you cross, then what? Likewise, piindoossnyaya says, "what?" And we answer "MMM, we'll draw a new one"?
  1. YOUR
    
    +5
    
    1 February 2023 08: 14
    
    Quote: Argon
    I'm interested in the terminology "red lines". What does this mean?
    
    Not just you. Everyone would like to understand where they start, where they end, and what will happen if you cross them.
  2. matsur
    
    +3
    
    1 February 2023 10: 26
    
    Quote: Argon
    I'm interested in the terminology "red lines". What does this mean? If you cross, then what? Likewise, piindoossnyaya says, "what?" And we answer "MMM, we'll draw a new one"?
    
    The one who spoke about the lines is now actively silent. Because it's already uncomfortable. It turns out that something terrible is promised for crossing the lines and ... And nothing! What is it called in the common people? You can't write here - censorship.
  3. Kusja
    
    +1
    
    1 February 2023 11: 36
    
    Yes, they seem to have one name left. It would be time to exclude this concept from everyday life, since it does not carry anything in itself. In my opinion, it would be the least to cover, but to do more and better engage in propaganda among the enemy.
3. Nastia makarova
  
  -4
  
  1 February 2023 08: 29
  
  where is the Krasnodar Territory shelled??????????????????????
Lech from Android.

0

1 February 2023 06: 11

What will be our answer... that is the question.
For this ammunition, they will undoubtedly begin to supply F-16s with foreign pilots ... I'm glad to be preparing to pass the relevant laws.
What will happen next? To what extent are the United States ready to go in confrontation with Russia?
1. 28st region
  
  +15
  
  1 February 2023 06: 20
  
  Quote: Lech from Android.
  What will happen next? To what extent are the United States ready to go in confrontation with Russia?
  
  I think the question should be put differently. To what extent is Russia ready to go getting constant flicks on the nose. Imagine how deep these shells will fly into Russian territory. Not sure if they will be hit. Do you know there are precedents.
2. ARIONkrsk
  
  +16
  
  1 February 2023 06: 25
  
  Quote: Lech from Android.
  What will be our answer... that is the question.
  For this ammunition, they will undoubtedly begin to supply F-16s with foreign pilots ... I'm glad to be preparing to pass the relevant laws.
  What will happen next? To what extent are the United States ready to go in confrontation with Russia?
  
  The people are interested in something else, to what extent our leaders will endure and sacrifice the guys at the front and feel sorry for the Ukrainians, without bombing the oligarchs railway tunnels and bridges, why there is still light in Ukraine
  1. krops777
    
    +4
    
    1 February 2023 06: 55
    
    why is there still light in Ukraine
    
    But what about business? The enemy needs electricity to pump gas through the territory of the enemy, electricity is also needed to pay for transit, and refuel grain carriers in ports, etc., etc. Here the information passed that in 404 20% of the world's titanium reserves, I think it was not by chance that a squabble began, it is unlikely that the capitalists will tear their ass for the people and bright ideas, everything will be much more prosaic - money.
  2. Nyrobsky
    
    0
    
    1 February 2023 10: 52
    
    Quote from ARIONkrsk
    why is there still light in Ukraine
    
    Because, among other things, there are several more nuclear power plants that generate energy in the microgrid. No one in their right mind will bomb them, unless the banderlogs themselves, propped up by mattresses, blow up. But with bridges and tunnels, yes, there are misunderstandings why they are still functioning.
3. svp67
  
  +3
  
  1 February 2023 06: 40
  
  Quote: Lech from Android.
  What will be our answer... that is the question.
  
  "Let's draw" a new 1001 "red line" ... Although now we'll see.
  The White House approved the supply of these munitions to Ukraine
  1. Nastia makarova
    
    -4
    
    1 February 2023 08: 30
    
    when he approves then and speak.......................
4. g_ae
  
  +7
  
  1 February 2023 06: 46
  
  Yes, none. Maximum "decisive concern" or "severe bewilderment." The red lines have already disappeared over the horizon. War is war and business is business. Business shouldn't suffer. Listen, well, if the Armed Forces of Ukraine are regularly supplied with Lukoil's oil products, then what can we say. But I remember how Old Man was persuaded for the supply of petroleum products to the NWO. And here it is completely different.
5. Aaron Zawi
  
  -2
  
  1 February 2023 07: 34
  
  Quote: Lech from Android.
  What will be our answer... that is the question.
  For this ammunition, they will undoubtedly begin to supply F-16s with foreign pilots ... I'm glad to be preparing to pass the relevant laws.
  What will happen next? To what extent are the United States ready to go in confrontation with Russia?
  
  Planes will come only after you have completely occupied the Donbass. As for the pilots, there was information on SNN that about 50 Ukrainian pilots and technical staff were already being trained.
  1. matsur
    
    +1
    
    1 February 2023 10: 42
    
    Quote: Aaron Zawi
    
    Planes will come only after you have completely occupied the Donbass. As for the pilots, there was information on SNN that about 50 Ukrainian pilots and technical staff were already being trained.
    
    Because THERE know the meaning of the word IN ADVANCE. THERE they prepare a sleigh in summer and a cart in winter. But not with us! The army is being prepared BEFORE military actions, and not DURING. THERE plan their actions, but with us everything is on paper, and taking into account the cut, it is generally unrealizable.
6. Argon
  
  -1
  
  1 February 2023 08: 10
  
  Neither they nor we have a way back. Here we raise the stakes. Let's get to the third world definitely! They think that we will press and Putin will merge, we think if we press them not fatally and they will merge.
  1. matsur
    
    +1
    
    1 February 2023 10: 51
    
    Quote: Argon
    Neither they nor we have a way back. Here we raise the stakes. Let's get to the third world definitely! They think that we will press and Putin will merge, we think if we press them not fatally and they will merge.
    
    We won't get there. I'm afraid Russia does not have enough strength to fight the whole world. In the current situation for sure. The economy is not on war footing. There is no real, overt, mobilization. And if the kotovasiya begins, it may already be too late. I wrote above that we do not know how to do it IN ADVANCE. Otherwise, the ammunition would not have been stolen. Announce mobilization now and what to wear soldiers? I am sure that not everyone will be dressed in a "warrior". An old Kalash, a knapsack and tarpaulin boots - all from stocks.
  2. Thorvlobnor IV
    
    +1
    
    1 February 2023 12: 53
    
    Well, if you are so nervous about small winged bombs, then what will happen if NATO uncovers its truly formidable weapon (not nuclear, by the way). What is the third world?! Avdiivka, Marinka, Ugledar, Bakhmut - still not taken. Even transformers, and those are not all broken up. World War III will end the same day it starts. Guess how it will end?
rotmistr60

+2

1 February 2023 06: 14

The White House is considering the possibility of supplying Ukraine with GLSDB - ammunition with a range of up to 150 km
Right now, the auditors will carry out their work, they will conclude that all financial assistance is spent for its intended purpose, no facts of theft and corruption have been established, and the White House with a "clear conscience" will decide on the supply of these missiles. I don't even know what our answer will be.
Ryaruav

+5

1 February 2023 06: 19

all of them will deliver until there is an adequate response or a quick collapse of the outskirts of the front as a result of the offensive of the Russian Federation
1. dmi.pris1
  
  +6
  
  1 February 2023 06: 25
  
  I am absolutely not a supporter of the actions of our leaders, but the question is: WHAT can they answer? The front is still thin, why bring down the front?
  1. Vladimir80
    
    +2
    
    1 February 2023 07: 09
    
    If there are no means to bring down the front, there was nothing to start !!!
    1. Nyrobsky
      
      -4
      
      1 February 2023 11: 21
      
      Quote: Vladimir80
      If there are no means to bring down the front, there was nothing to start !!!
      
      If we hadn't started, would they have attacked. Plus or minus six months or a year. This war was inevitable anyway, since it was initiated by Washington in order to economically bend Europe and bleed Russia.
      1. Thorvlobnor IV
        
        +4
        
        1 February 2023 12: 58
        
        Who are they"? Ukraine? To Russia? Are you out of your mind?
        Maybe NATO would attack? What for? The Russian Federation already sells everything they need regularly, and withdraws the proceeds there. And how, in your opinion, would the West "sell" the war with the Russian Federation to its voters, who already had Iraq and Afghanistan in their throats?
        It’s already good to retransmit% * no propaganda.
        
        Nyrobsky
        
        -1
        
        1 February 2023 16: 33
        
        Quote: Torvlobnor IV
        Who are they"? Ukraine? To Russia? Are you out of your mind?
        
        I'm in my own, but your mental abilities are just in doubt. Even the armless one already wrote that for March 22, they had prepared a plan of attack on the LDNR, and the entry of Russian troops on February 24.02.2022, XNUMX frustrated these plans. Maps and orders taken in Mariupol were published confirming this.
        Quote: Torvlobnor IV
        Maybe NATO would attack?
        
        Do you still think that NATO is not involved in the conflict?
        Quote: Torvlobnor IV
        What for?
        
        I have already indicated why.
        Quote: Torvlobnor IV
        The Russian Federation already sells everything they need regularly, and withdraws the proceeds there. And how, in your opinion, would the West "sell" the war with the Russian Federation to its voters, who already had Iraq and Afghanistan in their throats?
        It’s already good to retransmit% * no propaganda.
        belching from bulk and Kasparovshchina?
        
        Thorvlobnor IV
        
        0
        
        1 February 2023 21: 28
        
        Maps and orders taken in Mariupol were published confirming this.
        
        I can publish any map and order - you can't distinguish it from the real ones. To attack - you need forces and means, the concentration of troops, supplies of fuel, food, ammunition. In the end, we need aviation capable of overcoming enemy air defenses. And we still need political will, which was not there, including because of the position of the West to follow the Minsk agreements in everything. You probably forgot that long before the beginning of 2022, the Russian Federation concentrated a military contingent along the borders with Ukraine, which, as it were, hinted that any move towards Donbass is fraught with the opening of hostilities along its entire length. And Ukraine would not have had enough of its own stocks of shells for any more or less sane offensive operation. Everyone remembers the ammunition depots flying into the air. So go ahead, young man.
        
        "NATO would attack" and "NATO is involved in the conflict" are slightly different things, aren't they? Moreover, for an outside observer, the "conflict" is the largest war in Europe since 1945, a shameful page in the history of the planet. NATO was going to attack the Donbass? Yes or no?
        
        About the "burp" - it's clear, it's clear that you have nothing to object to. Before the NWO, the Russian Federation was a good trading partner for the rest of the world. Now there is no. Well, who lost from this?
  2. Leonidych
    
    0
    
    1 February 2023 08: 42
    
    Here the question arises, where is our army with all the weapons that we were shown on TV at the parade. After all, mercenaries, mobilized and volunteers are now fighting. WHERE IS OUR MILLION ARMY??? Or we will continue to plug holes for another 5 years and liberate one village from Ukrainians every year, because there is still a huge mobile resource. And the Americans still have a lot of weapons ..
    1. donavi49
      
      +5
      
      1 February 2023 09: 59
      
      The one on TV mostly ended last summer, which led to regroupings.
      
      New in progress.
      
      For some reason, the mobilized do not want to fight like Wagner convicts. Therefore, under Ugledar everything died out pretty quickly. But if they had fought like Prigozhin, then they would have fought for the center. But the trouble is, Vanka and Petka do not want to go on assaults 24/7, knowing that there are few chances to survive the assault.
2. matsur
  
  +4
  
  1 February 2023 11: 11
  
  Quote: Ryaruav
  all of them will deliver until there is an adequate response or a quick collapse of the outskirts of the front as a result of the offensive of the Russian Federation
  
  80+ years ago, the Germans bypassed the Maginot Line, and did not gouge into it. Now, where the front is, everything is in fortified areas, pitted with trenches, and probably with a bunch of minefields. Not Maginot, but still fortified. Plus Western intelligence from UAVs, satellites, etc. How to collapse such a front? There is no way to gather strength into a fist - in an hour they will know everything THERE. And if you collect it, they will hammer it with highmars. And now the Ukrainians will get a bunch of self-propelled guns, and then ours at the front will become even sourer. UAV-kamikaze had to be done before, not on time!
FoBoss_VM

+3

1 February 2023 06: 33

Excuse me, but when will we ourselves begin to cross the red lines and hit the impudent American soup so that the yushka is bloody in all directions? It is necessary to act in the same way as the Americans, but bolder and more assertive, because they understand only force and nothing but force. Remember the very beginning of yours, how they tightened their tails, thought everything, woke up the bear. And the bear yawned, stretched and again lay down to sleep in the den
1. Negro
  
  +2
  
  1 February 2023 11: 17
  
  Quote from: FoBoss_VM
  Excuse me, but when will we ourselves begin to cross the red lines and hit the arrogant American soups so that the yushka is bloody in all directions?
  
  Excuse me, what exactly are you suggesting?
  Quote from: FoBoss_VM
  Remember the very beginning of yours, how they tightened their tails
  
  They rated Ukraine very low militarily - and for good reason. Nobody wants to get involved in a losing business.
  
  But already in the spring, the understanding of events became different.
Lech from Android.

+2

1 February 2023 06: 34

Quote: 28st region
Imagine how deep these shells will fly into Russian territory. Not sure

They will hit our headquarters a hundred kilometers away and other important objects ... the situation may worsen.
Lena Petrova

+1

1 February 2023 06: 39

It is significant to destroy one satellite, or at least warn that this will be done.
1. FoBoss_VM
  
  +6
  
  1 February 2023 07: 11
  
  Why warn? No one warns us ... To gasp, and then make round eyes, shrug and say this is dumb in general, do everything exactly as the Americans do
  1. Aaron Zawi
    
    0
    
    1 February 2023 07: 35
    
    Quote from: FoBoss_VM
    Why warn? No one warns us ... To gasp, and then make round eyes, shrug and say this is dumb in general, do everything exactly as the Americans do
    
    What to gasp, where to gasp, what to gasp?
  2. Negro
    
    -2
    
    1 February 2023 11: 23
    
    Quote from: FoBoss_VM
    Gasp, and then make round eyes, make a helpless gesture and say this is dumb
    
    What are you willing to give in return? What frigate is Medvedev sent to scare America? Would you give it away, for example?
2. matsur
  
  +1
  
  1 February 2023 11: 30
  
  Quote: Lena Petrova
  It is significant to destroy one satellite, or at least warn that this will be done.
  
  They will showcase ours. So what? Our satellites will run out early. And without them, we are blind and deaf. Moreover, if they wish, they will use the satellites of other countries.
comings

-2

1 February 2023 07: 55

You have to answer symmetrically. Two pipelines exploded. Ours. It is necessary that two of them explode. For example, Norwegian. After that, the long-awaited era of prosperity of "green energy" begins in Europe, the EU can rejoice at the liberation from gas dependence, and we, yes, make round eyes: "how could this happen?"
1. Kurganets-45
  
  -2
  
  1 February 2023 08: 25
  
  only not two, but four must be destroyed, so it will be fair
2. Negro
  
  +1
  
  1 February 2023 11: 25
  
  Quote: comings
  It is necessary that two of them explode. For example, Norwegian. After that, the long-awaited era of prosperity begins in Europe.
  
  Suppose you are caught during this process and for pedagogical purposes they mine the Gulf of Finland and arrange a starvation blockade of the Kaliningrad region. What will you do next?
  1. Rosemary
    
    -4
    
    1 February 2023 11: 56
    
    Quote: Negro
    Suppose you are caught during this process and for pedagogical purposes they mine the Gulf of Finland and arrange a starvation blockade of the Kaliningrad region. What will you do next?
    
    It is clear that - in response to the aggression of the West to use nuclear weapons. "We, as a victim of aggression, we, as martyrs, will go to heaven, and they will simply die" (c)
    1. Negro
      
      +1
      
      1 February 2023 15: 30
      
      Are you sure everyone wants to die? I don’t want to yet, should I go to Australia?
Andy_nsk

+1

1 February 2023 08: 48

At the same time, the target itself can be found at any angle (up to 360 degrees) from the place and direction of the launch, according to the manufacturers.

Either the manufacturers, or the author with trigonometry is not ice!
Maybe 180 degrees? - I'm hinting, 360 degrees is the same direction, it's the same as zero degrees
1. matsur
  
  0
  
  1 February 2023 11: 35
  
  Quote from Andy_nsk
  At the same time, the target itself can be found at any angle (up to 360 degrees) from the place and direction of the launch, according to the manufacturers.
  
  Either the manufacturers, or the author with trigonometry is not ice!
  Maybe 180 degrees? - I'm hinting, 360 degrees is the same direction, it's the same as zero degrees
  
  This refers to the coverage of the entire space around. 180 is half a circle. Roughly speaking, you can shoot 180 degrees - it's straight at 12 o'clock to the right at 3 o'clock, to the left at 9 o'clock, that is, at everything in front of you. And they can launch a rocket, but if the target is behind, then the rocket will turn around and fly for 5,6,7 hours - where is its target
Beaver

-3

1 February 2023 08: 51

Why do they know how to destroy bridges and we don't? After all, destroying the Dnieper bridges is the end of the war
1. Negro
  
  0
  
  1 February 2023 11: 27
  
  Quote from Beaver.
  After all, destroying the Dnieper bridges is the end of the war
  
  Destroying bridges across the Volga - is this the end of the NWO?
  1. Beaver
    
    +1
    
    2 February 2023 14: 45
    
    No. Everything flies to us from China by planes. And the plane from Lviv to Kharkov will not fly - they will shoot down. Without bridges, a logistical collapse will occur along the left bank. They not only have to carry weapons, but also grub for the population. Traffic jams will form before crossings - sweet targets for geraniums.
    PS. The destruction of bridges across the Volga would create serious logistical problems for us, but not fatal
Kuziming

-1

1 February 2023 09: 14

They can put.
Will this fundamentally change the course of hostilities?
Possible tactical success.
Will this confrontation take it to a higher level?
Undoubtedly. Global risks will increase.
In the event that the latest weapons do not provide significant assistance to the Armed Forces of Ukraine, how will this affect the global authority of the United States?
The credibility of the United States as a world hegemon will fall.

In my opinion, the main goal of the United States is to make a profit.
How does the American scheme for profiting from the destruction of independent states usually work?
1. The independent economy collapses, the dollar becomes the main currency.
Based on this single point, there are numerous consequences useful for the United States:
- the flow of cheap raw materials,
- brain drain,
- provision of territory for hazardous production and hazardous research,
- cheap travel and sex services.
2. The United States makes a profit in the form of utilization of its own excess money supply, additional sales markets, neutralization of competitors.

Now let's think about how a global nuclear war could benefit the US financially.
In my opinion, now the situation looks like this:
1. The United States has been preparing Ukraine for decades, like a battering ram against Russia, in order to finally resolve the issue of Russian independence. They did indeed make large investments, but not too critical, on the scale of their economy.
2. The conduct of hostilities does not solve the problem of destroying Russia. On the contrary, there is a consolidation of anti-American forces, and a massive rejection of the dollar as a means of payment.
3. The continuation of the policy of sanctions leads to the paralysis of the European economy. The question arises of the transfer of European production to the United States.
4. And here a new question arises: will European factories operate in America? Will American society be able to "return in time" to the days of the mass working class, to abandon the thinking of financial bubbles, to recognize the flawed scheme of getting rich through stock exchange fraud?
If it is as clear as possible: will the "negroes on benefits" go to "sharpen the nut"?
5. In summary, war has both a forceful and a financial aspect.
Power confrontation can be developed until the complete destruction of civilization.
But the economic aspect has not justified itself. The US did not receive the expected profit. Operating costs are constantly rising.
If new shipments of modern American weapons do not change the situation, this will further undermine the reputation of the United States, increase the rejection of the dollar, and allied defections will begin. Such a reputational fiasco is more dangerous for the United States than the surrender of Ukraine.

Conclusions:
1. You can't relax. It is necessary with maximum diligence to improve the quality of our weapons.
2. We must try to minimize losses.
3. It is necessary to consolidate society as much as possible, to maintain an acceptable standard of living for the population.
4. A technological breakthrough is needed.
5. It is necessary to get rid of the dollar-based economy.
1. Vladimir80
  
  +2
  
  1 February 2023 09: 47
  
  the theses about the goals of the United States are correct, but I disagree with the conclusions on the intermediate results
  2. The conduct of hostilities does not solve the problem of destroying Russia. On the contrary, there is a consolidation of anti-American forces, and a massive rejection of the dollar as a means of payment.
  3. The continuation of the policy of sanctions leads to the paralysis of the European economy. The question arises of the transfer of European production to the United States.
  
  consolidation of anti-American sentiments occurs only among the 50+, and does not concern the elites (which is the most important!!!), there is no paralysis of the European economy - by the end of 2022, growth by 2...3% depending on the country...
2. Rosemary
  
  +2
  
  1 February 2023 11: 41
  
  Quote from Kuziming
  Conclusions:
  1. You can't relax. It is necessary with maximum diligence to improve the quality of our weapons.
  2. We must try to minimize losses.
  3. It is necessary to consolidate society as much as possible, to maintain an acceptable standard of living for the population.
  4. A technological breakthrough is needed.
  5. It is necessary to get rid of the dollar-based economy.
  
  6. It is necessary to significantly improve the level of well-being of citizens.
  7. It is necessary to ensure the economic, financial, technological, scientific and personnel sovereignty of Russia.
  8. It is necessary to ensure the outstripping growth of the defense industry, build up capacities in a short time, create new production lines and new types of weapons.
  9. It is necessary to reduce the fiscal and administrative burden for manufacturers of defense, industrial and agricultural products.
  10. It is necessary to increase the birth rate in Russia through a system of support for motherhood and childhood.
  11. It is necessary to switch Russia's foreign trade to the dynamic regions and markets of Asia, the Middle East, Latin America, and Africa.
  12. There is no time to build up.
  
  (c) From the speeches of V.V. Putin 2000 - 2023
antiquity

+3

1 February 2023 11: 02

Quote from Kuziming
Conclusions:
1. You can't relax. It is necessary with maximum diligence to improve the quality of our weapons.
2. We must try to minimize losses.
3. It is necessary to consolidate society as much as possible, to maintain an acceptable standard of living for the population.
4. A technological breakthrough is needed.
5. It is necessary to get rid of the dollar-based economy.

.
6. And at this moment I woke up
bravo77

+3

1 February 2023 12: 10

It surprises me how one smart politician, from whom all pensioners are crazy after watching TV. He gave the Americans the opportunity to play enough in Afghanistan, to withdraw troops, and then he started his own, having no possible leverage on ov.
handsome, I applaud. and 300 yards did not notice on the accounts of the west.
apparently he was preparing carefully in other directions, that he forgot about a trifle
bravo77

+1

1 February 2023 12: 12

Quote: Rosemary
Quote from Kuziming
Conclusions:
1. You can't relax. It is necessary with maximum diligence to improve the quality of our weapons.
2. We must try to minimize losses.
3. It is necessary to consolidate society as much as possible, to maintain an acceptable standard of living for the population.
4. A technological breakthrough is needed.
5. It is necessary to get rid of the dollar-based economy.

6. It is necessary to significantly improve the level of well-being of citizens.
7. It is necessary to ensure the economic, financial, technological, scientific and personnel sovereignty of Russia.
8. It is necessary to ensure the outstripping growth of the defense industry, build up capacities in a short time, create new production lines and new types of weapons.
9. It is necessary to reduce the fiscal and administrative burden for manufacturers of defense, industrial and agricultural products.
10. It is necessary to increase the birth rate in Russia through a system of support for motherhood and childhood.
11. It is necessary to switch Russia's foreign trade to the dynamic regions and markets of Asia, the Middle East, Latin America, and Africa.
12. There is no time to build up.

(c) From the speeches of V.V. Putin 2000 - 2023

We need a breakthrough
we need a breakthrough
no time for buildup
Yaroslav the Wise

0

1 February 2023 12: 58

As soon as the Russian Armed Forces capture Artyomovsk and go to Slavyansk, Kyiv will immediately receive such missiles. And these are blows to the very rear of our army.
Mol_18

-1

1 February 2023 23: 56

If GLSDB goes, then most likely it is worth waiting for a powerful offensive in the steppe regions. The Armed Forces of Ukraine will already have NATO-style tanks with excellent SLAs, which will allow them to hit targets at a distance of 2,5-3 km, and the new artillery assistance package, which will be provided to the previous one, will allow one or two offensives to be carried out, tasks to be completed, and offer the Russian leadership negotiations. And our guidance is ready for this, as citizen Matvienko said: “Our position is clear, intelligible and transparent. We are ready for negotiations <...> without the preconditions that they are trying to put forward. Negotiations are negotiations. But if the Kyiv regime is ready for real negotiations. We don't see it."
so I hope without goodwill gestures ...
1. cold wind
  
  -4
  
  2 February 2023 01: 28
  A situation is being created that it is impossible to defend the remnants of the Kherson and Zaporozhye regions. The supply arm is too large, attack helicopters will not be able to work effectively due to the range (~ 250 km), there are too few attack aircraft and bombers. The goodwill gesture will be in the summer.
kan123

-1

3 February 2023 23: 37

So far, not a single American has been hurt, they generally don’t care what to send. it is necessary to cover the USA - it will have to be done. If not for us, then no one will live, with such an interesting war: they bomb you and how are you.