Rogozin: The Tsarskie Wolves group will test combat and reconnaissance versions of the Marker robot in the NMD zone

The Marker robotic platform developed in Russia has reached the zone of the special military operation, where it will be tested in combat conditions. The developer offers two options Robot, one of which is intended for reconnaissance, the second - for combat operations. This was announced by the head of the Tsarskie Wolves special squad Dmitry Rogozin.

A promising robot will soon appear in the NWO zone, where it will undergo a full run-in, participating directly in hostilities. In the strike version, the platform can be equipped with various weapons, including anti-tank missiles, machine guns, etc. In the reconnaissance version, the "Marker" works with an outboard drone.

We are working on two versions of this machine. The first is a reconnaissance complex, it works with the so-called outboard drone (...) The second is a combat option

- leads RIA News Rogozin's words.

Speaking about the work of the reconnaissance version of the robot, the head of the "Tsar's Wolves" explained that the "Marker" raises a reconnaissance drone into the sky, connected to the platform with a power cable. The drone does not need a battery, it can hover in the air for a long time and observe at a distance of up to 20 km. In addition, it is not affected by electronic warfare systems.

Recall that the Tsarskie Wolves inspection group, created by the ex-head of Roskosmos on his own and initiative, is conducting tests in combat conditions of a promising weapons and military complexes, which for various reasons were not put into mass production. The group includes military advisers and experts with rich military experience and operates as a volunteer unit.

Comments

[Lech from Android.]

:

The Tsarskie Wolves group will test combat and reconnaissance versions of the Marker robot in the NMD zone

Why is Rogozin leaking information to the enemy ...
First, the deed must be done, and then only to blow the trumpet to the whole world ... Dmitry Olegovich is not good.

[Galleon]

This information does not matter and is not able to affect the course of the database. Therefore, the "wolf" makes noise.

[Lech from Android.]

Quote: Galleon

This information does not matter and is not able to affect the course of the database. Therefore, the "wolf" makes noise.

Dmitry Olegovich linked the testing of equipment with the Tsar's Wolves ... the agents of the Ukronatsiks will track their movement in the clash zone and direct their Khaimars to their location ... people may die, just like at Rogozin's famous party.

[alexis]

[quote] [/ quote] Why is Rogozin leaking information to the enemy ... what
First, the deed must be done, and then only to blow the trumpet to the whole world ... Dmitry Olegovich is not good.

Everything has already been "leaked" to "Army 2022".
https://topwar.ru/uploads/posts/2022-08/1559886322_0_320_3072_2048_1920x0_80_0_0_c71113e5a1757a26c2f59458d26d52e3.jpg

[hagen]

Quote: Lech from Android.

Why is Rogozin leaking information to the enemy ...

As the CIA press service "leaks" information, the department receives more than 80% of its targeted information from the open press of the media and social networks. Today, when all conflicts take place practically on-line, leakage of even sensitive information is inevitable. The counterintelligence of the FSB, probably, sometimes does not have enough vocabulary to characterize our universal passion for communicating on the net.

[Sith]

How do our Ministry of Defense and other structures "communicate" general and, like, non-secret information ... there, more than one neural network will break ... in order to extract something useful from there
The presentation of information is very unique.

[Monster_Fat]

royal wolves

Why not "dogs"? Or "Dogs"? Look, the inquisitors did not hesitate to call themselves "dogs of the Lord". And why "royal"? Do we have autocracy already officially? Are we missing something? Have there been changes in the Kremlin's corridors of power? Well, yes, will the robot be painted in "Khokhloma"? Will there be a "robot Fedor"? It must be - to accompany the "Marker" with a machine gun at the ready .... And be sure to call the priest - to consecrate the device before use, otherwise it will not work ....

[Woodman]

Quote: Monster_Fat

Why not "dogs"?

This group has been operating for quite a long time and does not hide its name, but you still cannot calm down?

Quote: Monster_Fat

And yes, will the robot be painted in Khokhloma?

Yes, at least how to paint it, if only it could cope with the tasks set.

Quote: Monster_Fat

And be sure to call the priest - to consecrate

At the front, priests are not a wonder for a long time and there are no complaints about their presence. So if they sanctify it, it won't be worse. No worse than the custom of breaking a bottle of champagne on the side of a ship or urinating on a bus wheel before a rocket launch.

[DymOk_v_dYmke]

Quote: Lesovik

So if they sanctify it, it won't be worse. No worse than the custom of breaking a bottle of champagne on the side of a ship or urinating on a bus wheel before a rocket launch.

Be.
We have a multi-confessional country and we don't need to single out one confession if we don't want to fall apart.

PS By the way, does the priest also urinate on the wheel?
Before sprinkling or after?

[Woodman]

Quote: DymOk_v_dYmke

By the way, does the pop piss on the wheel too?

As far as I know, priests have not yet flown into space.

Quote: DymOk_v_dYmke

Before sprinkling or after?

The main thing is that not after castration

Quote: DymOk_v_dYmke

Be.
We have a multi-confessional country and there is no need to single out one confession

And we also have tolerance. And there is a big difference between "allocate" and "use for good".

[Stirbjorn]

Quote: Monster_Fat

And why "royal"?

because that was the name of RDO-2, which actually fought in Bosnia, and quite successfully. There's even a book written about him, and it's pretty good.
Come up with your own name, you see, there are not enough brains. Now the "royal wolves" will be perceived by the people as Rogozin's jesters!

[Monster_Fat]

Thank you for the clarification. And then I already, God knows what I thought ....

[DymOk_v_dYmke]

Quote: Monster_Fat

Why not "dogs"? Or "Dogs"? Look, the inquisitors did not hesitate to call themselves "dogs of the Lord". And why "royal"?

The same questions keep coming up.

PS The choice could be wider, the closest relatives of dogs are jackals and coyotes.

[Monster_Fat]

Well .... here it is ... "Royal wolves" seem to be associated with something so "fast-footed" well, you remember: "the legs feed the wolf" .. And looking at the "subject" and actually at the contingent in his group , it's hard to imagine something so "fast-footed". A name like this would be more suitable, like: "Imperial Bears" ...

[DymOk_v_dYmke]

Quote: Monster_Fat

Well .... here it is ... "Royal wolves" seem to be associated with something so "fast-footed" well, you remember: "the legs feed the wolf" .. And looking at the "subject" and actually at the contingent in his group , it's hard to imagine something so "fast-footed". A name like this would be more suitable, like: "Imperial Bears" ...

"Swift deer".

Communication after the abolition of notifications became extremely inconvenient.

[Nikolaevich I]

Quote: Lech from Android.

Why is Rogozin leaking information to the enemy.

Yes, already "merged", somewhere, in the period from 2014 to 2020. ! Remember how a super-fighter was walking on the Internet about how Putin, together with assistants (Shoigu and his Yenaral team) from the Kremlin, stormed the Syrian height, super fortified by ISIS, "Markers" ??? True, there is a version (probably from anti-Putin spiteful critics!), That they stormed the ISIS high-rise in Syria, controlling the "Markers", the generals of the General Staff, but, anyway, from Moscow! So ... there is nothing to paraffin Dima "Sarmat"! He's not guilty! He was not seen in the disclosure of military secrets ... only in drinking vodka in the war! He will drink away the hotel, but he will not give out the secret!

[YOUR]

"Marker" lifts a reconnaissance drone into the sky, connected to the platform by a power cable. The drone does not need a battery, it can hover in the air for a long time and observe at a distance of up to 20 km. In addition, it is not affected by electronic warfare systems.

Up to 20 km? At the same time tied to a rope. Electronic warfare does not work, of course, if it is some kind of balloon with a camera.

[Ka-52]

Up to 20 km?

Well, here the author of the words, of course, waved. From a height of up to a kilometer, the line-of-sight range in PMU is unlikely to exceed 10 km. And the useful range is 5 km at all. But in general, for a number of conditions, these are quite useful features.

At the same time tied to a rope. Electronic warfare does not work, of course, if it is some kind of balloon with a camera.

the desire to aggro on cable-controlled drones is not at all clear. For some reason, the same actions of the French and Chinese did not cause an ora of critics.

[Prometey]

From a height of half a kilometer, the area is overlooked for 20 km

[28st region]

Purely theoretically, the line-of-sight range from a height of 0.5 km would be almost 80 km.
It's easy, in the search engine you type to calculate the line-of-sight range further further along the prompts. The question is, where to get such equipment so that it can examine camouflaged trenches, guns, cars, tanks from such a distance.
Why, like the author of the comment under discussion, I am so skeptical. So I live in the Amur Region, full of friends who work at the Vostochny cosmodrome, where these robots were sent to guard the perimeter. We saw them once and that was it. Now Rogozin took them to the NWO, came up with a new use for them, since they did not pass according to their first purpose. Pampering and expensive toys, money laundering.

[Horon]

Well, here the author of the words, of course, waved. From a height of up to a kilometer, the line-of-sight range in PMU is unlikely to exceed 10 km.

From a height of one kilometer, the range of direct observation can reach up to 50 km. From the ground, if there are no obstacles, you can observe up to 25 km. The main problem in the presence of line of sight will be in optics and atmospheric distortion.

[Ka-52]

From a height of one kilometer, the range of direct observation can reach up to 50 km.

Ask any pilot - visibility in PMU is usually given no more than 10 km.

The main problem in the presence of line of sight will be in optics and atmospheric distortion.

Ah so all ??? there is visibility or "distortions"? You already decide

[Johnson Smithson]

Ask any pilot - visibility in PMU is usually given no more than 10 km.

so it's eyes)
cameras and telephoto lenses have long been superior to the eyes, especially multispectral and with further image processing

[Ka-52]

cameras and telephoto lenses have long been superior to the eyes, especially multispectral and with further image processing

Yes, that's probably why the CMX-15D, which makes it possible to observe a target 30 km away, costs a million dollars. You are all strange people here. We are talking about a simple drone, and here you are talking about "multispectral channels". God forbid this drone has a micro 4/3 camera.

[Horon]

Ask any pilot - visibility in PMU is usually given no more than 10 km.

At 10 km in good weather and with good optics from a height of 1 km you can see people's faces.
I don’t know what the pilots see there and through what I suspect that 10 km of visibility does not mean the naked eye, but climbing into the mountains with good binoculars, I could see cars without details in a city located at a distance of 25-30 km from me. The height from which I observed this was a little less than 1 kilometer. If you use even better optics than I had at that time, you could see a moving train at a distance of 60 km. All this is possible in the absence of clouds, fog, low smoke, good lighting and not too much distortion from updrafts.
At low altitudes, distortion is more pronounced, the higher the less. Personal experience.

Ah so all ??? there is visibility or "distortions"? You already decide

Distortions (haze) reduce visibility, in the morning on a winter day there are fewer of them, on a hot summer afternoon there are more of them, what am I wrong about? Visibility is also affected by the presence or absence of clouds, fog, smoke, smog, precipitation, as well as the possibility of optics. As I wrote above, the absence of optics also reduces the possibilities and distance of observation, therefore, speaking of intelligence, one must assume its presence, since I cannot imagine modern intelligence without optics.

[Ka-52]

At 10 km in good weather and with good optics from a height of 1 km you can see people's faces.

Expand the concept of "good optics". You all rushed into meaningless discussions of some hypothetical possibilities. With this approach, you can still start talking about the Hubble telescope. Above, a friend answered already about optics. Have you seen quadcopter battlefield footage online? Well, for the most part they are performed from heights up to 1500m. With fairly good DJI optics, you can only see large objects the size of a 10-3-story house at your 5 km, at best, if there is no cloudiness or haze. What person are you talking about??? I saw a CMX-15D filming - a tank-aircraft-ship object is identified at a distance of 30 km. Without much detail. Well, the CMX-15D costs a million greenbacks, which is only allowed for large-tonnage vehicles a la Bayraktar.

[Horon]

Expand the concept of "good optics"

Telescope with 80+ magnification or equivalent lens.

I saw a CMX-15D filming - a tank-aircraft-ship object is identified at a distance of 30 km.

When determining at least the presence of movement from the enemy, it is enough to see the type of equipment: a truck, a passenger car, a group of people, armored vehicles, without detailing this is useful information, I think. In addition, I base my judgments on my own experience. The only digital camera I've dealt with that had a 12x optical zoom had a lousy sensor, but even with that you could recognize a car brand at a distance of almost 2 km and see a person standing in a narrow, shaded street passage at a distance of about 3,5 .XNUMX km. But it was an amateur camera.

[YOUR]

Here's a site with a line-of-sight range meter. Take an interest, count and do not guess.

https://www.translatorscafe.com/unit-converter/ru-RU/calculator/radar-horizon/

[Johnson Smithson]

From a height of up to a kilometer, the line-of-sight range in PMU is unlikely to exceed 10 km.

From a height of 1 km, the range of the horizon is as much as 120 km.
https://tehtab.ru/Guide/GuidePhysics/Length/DistanceToHorison/

It is hard to see in PMU and from a conventional drone, but this is solved by multispectral channels and computer image processing.

[hagen]

Quote: Ka-52

From a height of up to a kilometer, the line-of-sight range in PMU is unlikely to exceed 10 km.

There are formulas, there is geometry. If you are too lazy, then you can simply look at the table of the dependence of the horizon on height, from 1 km of height the visible horizon is 120 km ...

[hagen]

Quote: YOUR

Up to 20 km? At the same time tied to a rope

It's just a 100 meter climb. No super technologies... The cable will be really lighter than the battery. And yes, electronic warfare is difficult to compete with wires.

[Cananecat]

Quote: YOUR

Up to 20 km? At the same time tied to a rope. Electronic warfare does not work, of course, if it is some kind of balloon with a camera.

The principle of a balloon, but instead of an observer, high-resolution cameras and control via a cable-cable. Nothing new has been invented.

[igork735]

"In a hot air balloon,
Like an archangel I hang
And I see the whole picture."
Bumbarash

[archiroll]

I hope they will find activists who will fit the AGS with a sight and control from a small drone - IMHO, watching how the boys are storming the trenches - it would help a lot ...

[alexis]

https://topwar.ru/uploads/posts/2022-08/5656.jpg

[archiroll]

Separately, everything is there - you need to combine the elements.

[Li17]

Already got Rogozin with his shows! it seems that he is the main sponsor of VO! Can it be enough to play him here? As aptly noted here, all its value is to be a target for hymers, but on the other hand they considered that it is not worth the money, and it brings benefits with its chatter!

[Nikolay310]

well, "respectable" people need to do something ... one in Syria again took up paradis, probably Shoigu sends beautiful photo reports and videos ... a trampoline player too ...

Nicholas II also loved to move his Kuropatkins from place to place ... what all this led to yesterday Potanin reminded ...

and it’s not that the current miserable parody of Nikolai is a pity ... only now there is no one to say “there is such a party” ... which means you will have to drown along with all these royal clowns ...

[Vyacheslav57]

"Marker" lifts a reconnaissance drone into the sky, connected to the platform by a power cable.

As far as I understand, the most dangerous thing in using a UAV is takeoff and landing. There were several videos here when a drone landing is detected and immediately, an artillery strike is delivered to this place to destroy the drone operator. Now imagine that such a reconnaissance drone "Marker" is crawling and an UAV is hanging on a rope (cable). The enemy sees this and he just has an itch, to hammer something into this place. Of course, he will not reach the operator, he is sitting at a safe distance, but the "Marker" will not find it enough. Maybe I'm wrong, and the principle of work there is completely different.

[Sergei_tactics]

You just reduced the main advantage of drones (safety for operators) to a disadvantage. How is that? And what else are drones needed for, if not to reduce human losses?

[Vyacheslav57]

Hi Sergey! I wrote-

. Of course, he will not reach the operator, he is sitting at a safe distance, but the "Marker" will not find it enough.

What is the problem ?

[Genry]

Quote: Vyacheslav57

What is the problem ?

For the enemy: the complex is mobile.

[Johnson Smithson]

and where did you find the operator there, in a wedge?)

[DymOk_v_dYmke]

Quote from Johnson Smithson

and where did you find the operator there, in a wedge?)

But the tankette is already detected and destroyed for sure easier than the operator in the prone position.
And what link in the chain to knock out to disable it - no difference.

[nickname7]

As far as I understand, the most dangerous thing in using a UAV is takeoff and landing

Misunderstanding, radio drone is spotted on the radio. Wired will not be detected.

[Ross xnumx]

Recall that the Tsarskie Wolves inspection group, created by the ex-head of Roskosmos on his own and initiative, is testing promising weapons and military complexes in combat conditions, which for various reasons were not put into mass production. The group includes military advisers and experts with rich military experience and operates as a volunteer unit.

An interesting frame. Of all the "military campaigns" only a case is known:

In August 1991, he participated in the events of the August coup on the side of the White House, led a group of volunteer defenders of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR.

But managed:

In 1999, he defended his dissertation there for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy on the topic "Problems of Russia's National Security at the Turn of the 2016st Century." In XNUMX, he defended his dissertation at the N. G. Kuznetsov Naval Academy for the degree of Doctor of Technical Sciences in the specialty “Armament Theory, Military-Technical Policy, Weapons System”.

He rushed into space, but the trampoline did not work, and now the "highly powerful" hero decided to defeat the enemy with a group of comrades...
How is it with Gorky?
Born to crawl, don't suffer on the runway...
* * *
Something a lot of people strive to get into the fathers of victory. Either DAM throws out a pearl about weapons based on new physical principles, or DOR checks something that needs little verification ...
I feel that this robot will fall into the wrong hands ...

[Sergei_tactics]

What kind of military campaigns do you have? What did you do to win our soldiers at the front?

[1razvgod]

And what did the cattail do? Got a shrapnel in the ass during a party? He didn’t do anything sensible for the country before the NWO and didn’t do anything during the NWO except drinking that led to the death of people. He is not there for the sake of the fighters, do not flatter yourself .....

[Dart2027]

Quote: Sergey_tactics

What did you do to win our soldiers at the front?

Whine, whine and whine.

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: Sergey_tactics

What did you do to win our soldiers at the front?

I send money from my pension (at least): 1000 rubles monthly...
It is true that from an early age (when Rogozin was still not conceived) I keenly feel window dressing ... Such a nature ...

Quote: Dart2027

Whine, whine and whine.

I hate to unsubscribe to you. I told you about it.
Noah Noah. And my messages contain questions and theses that have a basis ...
For all the time you have not covered a single issue with the provision of facts and links. Any criticism of the current situation is a bone in your throat ...
I have nothing against it if you begin to tell every day how well and conscientiously this or that “Russian figure” works, laying out the real fruits of their tireless work.
It is enough for me that I did not swear allegiance to drunkards and thieves.

[nickname7]

Interesting frame

Rogozin promised that he would track down the howitzer that wounded him.

[Rusfaner]

In my opinion, in the operetta "The Bat" there was a character who, while hunting, was shot in the ass by the master. After that, the servants joked that there were now not twelve, but thirteen "with a shot" ...
"Royal Wolf" with a shot in the ass somehow does not sound! Yes, and it looks a lot like an ordinary talker.

[Woodman]

Quote: Rusfaner

"Royal wolf" with a shot in the ass

The unceasing passion of some commentators for Rogozin's "ass" suggests certain thoughts about the inclinations of these same commentators ...

[forty-eighth]

Clown
______________________________

[Stas157]

. Dmitry Rogozin, head of the Tsarskie Wolves special squad

Sounds cool! From one mention, Bandera hares must run! I hope now Rogozin is in his place and the robot Marker will not repeat the former glory of the robot Fedor!

That's just why Rogozin has royal wolves? What is he hinting at?
According to the constitution, according to ours, those wolves should be presidential! Or am I confusing something?

[Woodman]

Quote: Stas157

That's just why Rogozin has royal wolves?

Why "at Rogozin's"? Isn't he one of them?

Quote: Stas157

According to our constitution

Do you think the constitution needs to be changed? Then, before such a replacement, I propose to rename the group "royal wolves" to "imperial wolves". Well, so as not to bother with the constitution twice.

[Vladimir M]

That's who this Dimka Batuta let go there, he's nobody now? Or can anyone of us rummage around there?

[Monster_Fat]

"Strange" here - Strelkov-Girkin is not allowed there, and the "trampoline person" freely roams wherever he wants ...

[Vladimir M]

If Trampoline was doing something serious, then it would not be heard, "it would be lower than grass, quieter than water."

[DymOk_v_dYmke]

Quote: Vladimir M

is he nobody now?

[Vladimir M]

The trampoline carries such nonsense. Where does this honor come from? Avenger, damn it. And this led Roskosmos ..... there are no words, and then we are surprised why, in our country everything is through one place, the same NWO is going so strange, to say the least.

[Stirbjorn]

And where is the photo of Rogozin personally testing, or at least giving the order for testing ?! Boring design of the article this time, the PR service did not work

[Nikolaevich I]

In the reconnaissance version, "Marker" works with a suspended drone.
Yoksel-moksel! Well, how can a pensioner keep up with modern "linguists" ... young, nimble ... and greyhounds! Just got used to the phrases: "tethered balloon"..."tethered quadrocopter", how to "get used" to this heresy: "suspended balloon"..."suspended quadrocopter" !! When will "rooks" stop being allowed to "correct" the Russian language?

[APASUS]

This is the kind of Marker that the boys who storm the cities need. Of course, intelligence is the basis, but combat power does not fit during an assault

[Pavlos Melas]

This marker should have been booked, otherwise the enemies are on the alert.

[DymOk_v_dYmke]

Quote: Pavlos Melas

This marker should have been booked, otherwise the enemies are on the alert.

A red line will be drawn on the stern for protection.

[solar]

In the reconnaissance version, "Marker" works with a suspended drone.

The word hanging suggests that the attachment point is higher than the object itself.
And the author is hung upside down, from the bottom up :))

[nazgul-ishe]

They thought of a good thing. And they are wolves or some other animal we will see.

[Andriuha077]

The platform is like a target.
Remote controlled walker.

[Last centurion]

Does he know how to work silently? Chatterbox is a godsend for a spy

[Grandfather Mozai]

Batutchik and Khokhlomchik of pure water, PR and talker, a kind of manager for sawing the state dough, God forbid he will be appointed, at least by someone, in the new regions of Russia.