Kadyrov: The Russian Armed Forces "click" the American Patriot air defense systems in Ukraine

The head of Chechnya, Ramzan Kadyrov, wrote on his Telegram channel that the Russian Armed Forces are “overshooting” the American Patriot air defense systems that the United States decided to supply to Kyiv.

According to Kadyrov, such consideration awaits not only the Patriot air defense system, but also anyone who sent weapon against Russia. The head of Chechnya noted that as soon as the enemies of Russia understand this, they "will crawl on their knees to ask for negotiations."

On December 21, the United States announced a new package of military assistance to Ukraine for an impressive amount of $ 1,85 billion, which also mentioned the installation of the Patriot anti-missile defense system. Then US President Baidan called them exclusively defensive means that do not lead to an escalation of the conflict.

Recall that on December 22, President Vladimir Putin, commenting on the possible supply of Patriot complexes to Kyiv, also promised to "click" them. And the press secretary of the President of the Russian Federation Dmitry Peskov said that the ongoing supply of American weapons to Kyiv does not lead to the fact that the Kyiv authorities have a desire to resume peace talks.

The Patriot air defense system was developed in the United States in the 1970s and is an analogue of the Soviet (Russian) S-300 air defense system, the development of which began around the same time.

Comments

[Thrifty]

No, here you need to capture at least one launcher and bring it to Russia, and show it to the whole world! Only after that you can destroy the rest. And the capture of the launcher, preferably with missiles, will bury the patriot for future buyers!

[Sith]

Even if we take
The state media will say that we sawed it out of plywood with a jigsaw from photos on the Internet ... full-sized mock-ups.
And all the rest of their snitches will support
It’s better to let them smash it on the way or at the position ... the necessary news will find its way among the special services of different states

[Alexandr2637]

The head of Chechnya, Ramzan Kadyrov, wrote on his Telegram channel that the Russian Armed Forces are “overshooting” the American Patriot air defense systems

Don't say gop .... First, "click", and then you'll see, or you can crap one's pants.

[skeptick2]

Yes, the statement is loud.
But I would like to clarify - what military education has the head of Chechnya? Which allows him to make such categorical predictions?
We are aware of the title. What education?

[solar]

Yes, the statement is loud.
But I would like to clarify - what kind of military education does the head of Chechnya have? Which allows him to make such categorical predictions?

You are asking the wrong question.

And what really education has the head of Chechnya?

[Vitaly gusin]

Quote from solar

You are asking the wrong question.
And what kind of education does the head of Chechnya have?

In 1992 he graduated from secondary school No. 1 in his native village of Tsentora-Yurt (Tsentaroy) of the Kurchaloevsky district.
In 2004 he graduated with honors from the Makhachkala Institute of Business and Law with a degree in Jurisprudence. According to the text of an interview with Ramzan Kadyrov dated June 2004, published in Novaya Gazeta, he graduated from the branch of the Moscow Institute of Business in Gudermes, but found it difficult to name the topic of his diploma and the branch of law in which he specializes.
He has two degrees, Candidate of Economic Sciences and the status of a professor.

[Egor53]

Napoleon and Suvorov had no military education. And nothing, fought.

[solar]

Who told you this? You have been deceived.
Napoleon graduated from the royal military school at Brienne-le-Château and the Higher Military School of Paris.
Suvorov not only had a military self-education thanks to his father, a professional military man, General-in-Chief, author of the first military dictionary, but also attended classes in the land gentry cadet corps.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Alexandr2637

First "click"

Almost four hundred S-300s and Bukovs have already clicked - what's the problem with clicking four more launchers and one Patriot locator?

[single-n]

And that is why our aviation is bombing targets all over Ukraine!!! Or not?

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Single-n

our aviation bombs targets throughout Ukraine

Our army destroys targets throughout Ukraine. Or not?

[lis-ik]

Quote from: nik-mazur

Quote: Alexandr2637

First "click"

Almost four hundred S-300s and Bukovs have already clicked - what's the problem with clicking four more launchers and one Patriot locator?

Paper and grateful viewers of the zombie will endure everything.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: lis-ik

spectators zomboyaschik

And you, like, teach information directly from top secret safes?

[YOUR]

With the Ukrainian air defense systems, something is weak to flip. No matter how our aviation did not fly to Ukrainians, it does not fly.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: YOUR

With Ukrainian air defense systems, something is weak to click

A simple question: if the UkroPVO feels great, then why the heck is the Ukrainian leadership begging the collective West to adjust at least something? Nassams, Irises, the Iron Dome, German barrel farts without shells, Greek S-300s, these unfortunate Patriots, which in terms of performance characteristics are no better than those Ukrainian S-300s, which, according to the all-pissers, ours cannot destroy in any way? At least something, at least some junk, at least one battery or a couple of pieces?
And if our aviation does not fly in the depths of Ukrainian territory (it flies quite well at the forefront - fifty sorties every day), then there are two reasons for this:
a) Now it is not at all necessary to fly into the air defense coverage area in order to launch an air strike. The Israelis, for example, act like this for many years and everyone praises them for it - like, well done, they take care of their pilots and their planes.
b) Single ukroZRK still remained. They do not perform their functions of covering objects, but they can shoot down an aircraft from an ambush. But do we need it, to lose planes, even if rarely?

[YOUR]

An even simpler question. If everything is so bad with their air defense, then why doesn’t our aviation fly over Ukroreich?
What is an SAM ambush? He sits silently and suddenly how babahnet. And they naturally receive data directly from the Pentagon, well, like AWACS, they transmit it via starlink.

[9PA]

Well, yes, yes, just like himars, just like starlink will be put out

[hellcos]

"they will crawl on their knees to ask for negotiations" from the creators of "Kyiv in 3 days"

[cash]

Kyiv in 3 days was replicated by the Americans and the pigs picked up this narrative, so by

[solar]

Look at that time. Some gave not only three days, but two hours to take Kyiv.

[cash]

this is if we took it like the Americans Dresden, only there would hardly be anything left of Kiev

[Mikhail Krivopalov]

But did the Americans claim that the inhabitants of Dresden are their brothers and they are one people? Could this be the issue?

[Mikhail Krivopalov]

Since 2014, on Central TV, guests at Solovyov and Skobeeva have repeatedly talked about 36 hours of invited parsley. Or did I not know something and all these guests are American agents and pigs?

[nik-mazur]

Quote from Hellcos

from the creators of "Kyiv in 3 days"

Kievzatridnya™ - this is some American general said, isn't it?

[t-12]

About "Kyiv in 3 days" was broadcast by the "television expert" Kedmi a couple of weeks before the NWO.

[dmi.pris1]

With all due respect to Ramzan-eoo, the guys are really doing a lot .. But the Westerners will not crawl on their knees to ask for peace .. They may even admit defeat, but will continue to harm by all means

[polynet]

Andrei Sokolov
22.12.2022
The Ukrainian army is actually destroyed

“Russia wins in Bakhmut, Ukraine loses, and this shows that this is becoming the main strategic development of the war,” said Richard Black, a retired US Army colonel who commanded special forces and detachments of the Marine Corps, during his speech at a conference of the Schiller Institute.

According to him, "the battle for the Ukrainians is lost, and the outcome of the war has already been decided." The colonel believes that the fighting in Artemivsk is devastating for the Armed Forces of Ukraine, despite a fourfold increase in the number of troops of the Armed Forces of Ukraine by the beginning of 2023. "Ukrainian soldiers," Black recalled, "thrown into the deadly trap in Bakhmut by the thousands and don't seem to know what to do now."

Black noted that the number of dead Ukrainian military is simply staggering, and the population of Ukraine will not allow Kyiv to make up for losses in manpower.

“They,” he said, “are losing 500 to 700 soldiers a day! Ukraine loses more people in a day in Bakhmut alone than the United States lost in a month during the Vietnam War. And in Ukraine, the population is smaller than in the US… The conflict is lost, I would just say to the Ukrainians – be careful, because if you think that everything has been bad so far, you will see something that goes beyond everything that you imagined still".

“Ukraine lost in this conflict,” the ex-adviser to the head of the Pentagon, retired colonel Douglas McGregor, agrees with his conclusions. In an interview posted on Judging Freedom's YouTube website, he remarked: “I would even say it happened some time ago. It becomes so obvious that even the most ardent supporters of Kyiv's struggle against Russia in London, Berlin, Paris and Washington will not be able to object. Some may argue, but in fact the conflict is over. Ukrainians daily lose from 500 to 1000 fighters killed and wounded….

Their army is virtually destroyed. They send reservists - an analogue of our National Guard - directly into the meat grinder. The Russians calmly and methodically destroy everyone in their path. Russia has already begun to consolidate control over 25-30% of Ukraine on a daily basis. Under the control of Moscow is the territory, which accounts for about 80% of Ukrainian GDP. I believe the Russians will keep it and introduce it into their country. They are annexed. These lands were historically Russian, and now they are back.”

And on his You Tube channel, McGregor recently said that the conflict in Ukraine is turning against the United States itself. “Washington,” he said, “can no longer try to impose American or US-led Anglo-American hegemony on the rest of the world. The rest of the world doesn't want it. To be honest, the Americans themselves do not need it. So the hegemony will collapse, collapse, and the conflict between Russia and Ukraine will accelerate this process,” the colonel believes.

Now the hegemony is coming to an end because the US is practically ruined financially, McGregor pointed out. “We are talking about how much, 30 or 31 trillion dollars of state, sovereign debt? We find ourselves in the same position as the UK in 1947, when, after the Second World War, the country's debt-to-GDP ratio was 240%, ”concludes the colonel.

American military analyst Mick Ryan, in an interview with Foreign Affairs, in turn, praised the commander of the Russian Armed Forces in Ukraine, General Sergei Surovikin.

General Surovikin, he said, looks tougher and more efficient than his predecessors. And declining Western support for Kyiv will pave the way for a successful counteroffensive by the Russian military, the analyst added. During the winter campaign, the Russian Armed Forces under the command of Surovikin will act more smoothly and consistently, as a result of which they will be able to avoid heavy losses.

“If the Kremlin succeeds in preventing NATO countries from supporting Kyiv, this could be disastrous for Ukraine, the military and financial support of the United States and Europe was necessary for success on the battlefield,” said Mick Ryan. “President Volodymyr Zelensky should be more careful in his plans for Crimea, as Kyiv could be left without the help of the United States and NATO.”

Columnists David Rundell and Michael Gfeller, in a piece for the weekly Newsweek published under the heading "Lessons From the US Civil War Show Why Ukraine Can't Win", stated that after If Russia reconsiders its approaches to the special operation, Ukraine has practically no chance of winning the conflict.

“Russia,” writes Newsweek, “transferred its economy to a war footing, mobilized and gathered hundreds of thousands of military personnel, both reservists and volunteers. All of them will fight with modern Russian weapons, and despite everything that the Western press writes, they are not at all demoralized. But Ukraine has completely exhausted its arsenals and without the military assistance of the West simply will not be able to continue hostilities. As soon as the Ukrainian black soil is well frozen, the Russians will launch a massive offensive. They, in fact, have already started it, if you look at an important transport hub - the city of Bakhmut, which became something like Verdun in this war, ”the authors of the Newsweek article say.

But talking about the defeat of Ukraine and expressing doubts about the “victory of Kyiv” is not only the media and retired American colonels who are not afraid to speak their mind against the backdrop of rampant US censorship of all alternative views, but even the highest-ranking active military.

Thus, during a briefing following the meeting of the contact group on assistance to Kyiv, the chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Mark Milley, ruled out the ability of the Armed Forces of Ukraine to dislodge Russian troops from Ukraine and called this goal "very difficult."

In his opinion, the withdrawal of the RF Armed Forces from the territory of the country will not happen in the next few weeks without their "complete collapse", which is "unlikely". In an interview with the New York Times, Milley actually admitted that Ukraine was no longer able to continue the war and should sit down at the negotiating table.

“Ukrainians,” he said, “have achieved what they could reasonably expect <…> before the onset of winter, and they should try to consolidate their achievements at the negotiating table.”

However, such still rather acute doubts of a high-ranking military officer about the “undoubted victory of Kyiv”, as recently unanimously repeated in the West, are so contrary to the mainstream prevailing in the United States that Millie was immediately attacked with angry criticism. Thus, the Wall Street Journal called his position "reckless." And therefore, it is no coincidence that the same Milley reversed his course and declared that Washington was ready to continue providing military assistance to Ukraine "as long as it takes." However, you can't hide the sewing in the sack, doubts in the USA about the "victory" of their Kyiv satellite are growing.

[novel66]

These lands were historically Russian, and now they are back.”

Fuck! It turns out they know about it?

[runway-1]

The Ukrainian army is actually destroyed

Great, but what's the problem then? Or is something still going wrong?

[yuriy55]

Kadyrov: The Russian Armed Forces "click" the American Patriot air defense systems in Ukraine

The man said - the man will do it!

[Mikhail Krivopalov]

Didn't the journalists on TV say the same thing at first about Hymers and some other weapons? I suppose that when news comes out in the media about the appearance of our new products in the NWO zone, politicians also talk about them. I remember in 2014-15 bravura reports about dozens of damaged Armats (although no evidence was provided, because the cameras and phones were not charged

[KCA]

There is no need to deploy Hymars, he reached the point, fired a volley and left, all things for 5 minutes, with the Patriot air defense system a little bit longer, this is positional air defense, is on duty, waiting, after successfully repulsing the attack, you can collapse the complex and relocate, but this is at least half an hour turn off, and between the first and second attacks there is a small break - the radar was turned off, the missiles were in a horizontal position, and then they arrive, the Patriot at the launcher has a sectoral firing zone - only forward, and the KR and UAVs, not to mention manned aircraft, will easily come in from the direction below the back , what is it, 4 PUs crossed in on 4 sides

[single-n]

And the Patriot air defense systems usually cover short-range MANPADS tied to a single target designation system. Plus the Air Defense Sector overlap mutually. Shall we stab the strikers then? Something our aircraft over Kyiv can not be seen.

at the Patriot, the launchers have a sectoral firing zone - only forward, and the KR and UAVs, not to mention manned aircraft, will easily enter from the direction below the back, is that, put 4 launchers in a cross on 4 sides

And deploy PU not? Or is it cast in concrete?

[Mikhail Krivopalov]

I'm not talking about "it is necessary / not necessary to deploy", but about bravura statements. There is a saying "Don't say gop until you've jumped over". I really don’t like the trend of the last couple of decades, to even take sports (football, hockey, the Olympics), this bragging begins ahead of time as we will “tear everyone”, and then, as a rule, comes down to indistinct muttering why it didn’t work out. The same medal tables, at first there were always only first places, then 1-2, then 2-4, then it’s good that they entered the top 5, then it’s good that they were in the top 10, now it’s not always in the top 10, although now there are none now, do not participate at all.

[Virus-free crown]

Another "nutcracker" ... Kyiv has already been taken in 3 days ...
The main rule is - Don't underestimate the enemy!!!
Already a hundred times all the Hamers have been "clicked" (((

[Flashpoint]

It has to be done anyway, one way or another. But it will add complexity.

[lubesky]

Excellent Ramzan Akhmadovich! And then the question can be? And why in a year almost air defense is not pereschelkov then?

[single-n]

Maybe, as with Kyiv, there was no order? And yes, we can definitely do it. The man is still an academic. Will not write nonsense.

[Zaurbek]

From the very beginning, the SVO UkroPVO did not protect specific objects on the territory of 404, but was engaged in "hunting" for our aircraft. Patriot is an almost stationary system (but better paired with NATO intelligence) what are its functions?

[Maks1995]

Well, Kadyrov's previous promises have already been somehow forgotten, I decided to remind myself.
Logical.
He won't click...

[terms]

Well, the statement for Kadyrov, as usual, is too loud. Although, in fact, how does the Patriot fundamentally differ from the S-300-400-500? In the sense that he is clearly not some kind of saint from the snot of virgins. Most likely, they will simply take care of it, but I doubt that it will effectively repel the blow with calibers and mopeds. But it will be useful to study their work. If you tighten up, you can make a good anti-advertising for this complex. The question is whether they want
Another thing is that the better this complex is relative to the S-400 and 500. And I'm not only talking about performance characteristics - in any war, the economy of weapons is no less important. We all know what a dofiga cool tank the Germans had the Tiger. But bad luck, 34 won the war. Because it had the best combination of engine, mass, armor and weapons, despite its mass character, cheapness and simplicity of design. While the production of the Tiger took, firstly, much more labor, and secondly, most types of repairs required the tank to be removed from the battlefield. It seems like 1 patriot needs about 100 servants. How much does it cost to manufacture? Wouldn't it be better to produce 10 S-400 complexes at the same price, which would require training many times less people?

[Prisoner]

Akhmatych has a sin - pathos breaks through a person at times. Today, there is more harm from hamers, they would be snapped. And this sedentary complex will receive its own, again in due time.

[Jonny_Su]

This is the military analytics that we deserve and that is available to us. Kadyrov's think tank is all we have ((