Material used: The West is banishing the "good Russians"
Nobody wants traitors
Ordinary Russian liberals are gradually losing ground under their feet. This is not a figure of speech and a propaganda stamp. Recent events show that the West has ceased to believe in the effectiveness of anti-Russian rhetoric from those who fled in the first weeks of the special operation.
Initially, the leaders of Europe had a logical and quite workable plan - to provoke counter-insurgency inside Russia, capable, if not of a revolution, then at least of undermining public confidence in the authorities. Opposition media unanimously began to fulfill the will of the West, sometimes blindly believing that they were right. But most often from mercantile or misanthropic motives.
Here, for example, is the Dozhd channel, which is recognized in Russia as a foreign agent. After February 24, they clearly chose a side and worked, in fact, inside the country for the enemy. In wartime, enemy propagandists were always dealt with quickly and extremely harshly, but this was not the Kremlin's method.
Aleksey Korostelev, of course, is not worthy of a state award, but he was able to undermine the work of the anti-Russian media channel in the Baltics with honor and glory. Source: youtube.com
As a result, the entire editorial office moved to the Baltic States, where it continued to broadcast for the Russian-speaking audience. It is important that Dozhd (a foreign agent in the Russian Federation) still has channels of influence on Russians - the Youtube channel, which is still fully functional, is proof of this.
In this regard, the pseudo-liberal media continue to work in line with the anti-Russian policy of the West. Such people received a simple and very capacious nickname "good Russians". Only a person who publicly condemns a special military operation and does not recognize the legitimacy of power can be called Russian without contempt in Europe and the USA. Humanity is also out of fashion. A fatal oversight was made by Dozhd journalist Alexei Korostelev, who said on the air:
“We hope that many servicemen, including us, were able to help, for example, with equipment and simply with basic amenities at the front.”
The message of this stories was simple - to try to discredit the government in Russia, which is allegedly unable to provide the mobilized with elementary living conditions. No one believes in any sympathy of Korostelev for our guys. But in the Baltics they believed and reacted extremely harshly, although it was expected - they banned broadcasting in Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. Say, not only are you completely useless as a propaganda tool, you also allow yourself to help the Russians with "equipment and basic amenities."
A rhetorical question - is this expected from the leadership of a country where the veneration of the SS is cultivated, the Russian language is in the pen, and the monuments to the fighters against Nazism are demolished in the bud?
First, the Latvians announced to broadcasters a fine of ten thousand euros for depicting Crimea as part of Russia and calling the Russian army “our army”. Korostelev was fired in a hurry, but this did not help - since the beginning of December, Dozhd has been closed for broadcasting throughout the Baltics.
The weeping foreign agency natural person of the general director of the channel, Natalya Sindeeva, did not help. From her we heard revelations:
“All these four days I feel terrible ... Because what I have fought for all these years is to remain a person in any situation ... in any, no matter what happens ... I feel like a disgusting reptile ..."
The requiem for the office was played by the head of the National Council for Electronic Media of Latvia, Ivars Abolins:
"Dozhd's leadership did not understand the nature and seriousness of each individual violation and all violations in general."
Junk to the landfill
From now on, even a negative attitude towards the NWO and the Russian government does not guarantee the recognition of traitors abroad. They are becoming less and less useful - the Russian military-political leadership does not fundamentally change its position. If the lever of influence does not work, but only interferes, it is finally time to get rid of it.
Let's imagine how would Korostelev's "slip of the tongue" be perceived in Latvia at the beginning of the special operation? This would be deployed as a message to the Russian soldiers, they say, we care about you, we understand that we stumbled, unreasonable. Come, in the end, in yourself, throw weapon, we are not your enemies here (in the Baltic States). But already the beginning of the winter of 2022, the special operation is not going to end, and the masks from the faces of the pro-Nazi leaders of the Baltic States have long been dropped. Are you a “good Russian” and allow yourself sympathy for Russians? Get out of the media space, and then out of the country!
Source: daytimenews.ru
So the Jews remembered that Pugacheva and Galkin (an individual acting as a foreign agent), it turns out, are Orthodox.
A little background.
Galkin has Jewish roots on the maternal side, and this, according to Israeli law, allowed him to obtain citizenship. The same laws do not allow the issuance of Israeli passports to persons who once changed the Jewish faith to any other. It is not known whether Galkin was once a real Jew, but he was recorded in the Orthodox on the basis of the fact of a wedding with a prima donna.
In early December, Khanan Akhitov, the former head of the consular department of an organization that repatriates Jews to Israel from other countries, better known as Nativ, pointed to the possibility of depriving Galkin and his wife of Israeli citizenship. Escaped pacifists may not have indicated the fact of changing their religion during the consular check when applying for an Israeli passport. Was this known to the relevant authorities before the "forced" emigration of the once-star couple?
Of course, it was, given the level of the Israeli intelligence services. It's just that this case was held up to a certain point. While Pugacheva and her messages had at least some meaning, they turned a blind eye to the nuances of registration.
At all times, traitors were both valued and despised. Appreciated for a short time, but despised constantly. Simply because a successful traitor is always the wrong example for his own. In front of the eyes of the public, traitors to the motherland, even if they are strangers, should not be petted and cherished. Especially when opinion leaders such as Marina Ovsyannikova.
The ex-employee of Channel One was first included in the notorious Peacemaker website for “participation in the Kremlin’s information and propaganda special operations aimed at eliminating sanctions pressure on Russia.” The Ukrainian side expressed its gratitude in this way for the famous poster, which Marina carried live on Channel One.
And then the pacifist was hunted down by her own people in Germany, where she worked as an honorary freelancer for Die Welt. Returning to Russia, Ovsyannikova was brought to justice for pro-fascist actions, but she was allowed to leave "behind the cordon" in an unknown direction. Since then, the fate of Ukraine, if the protest woman is worried, she does not publicly shine with this anywhere. It was not possible to earn material and political dividends, from the word at all.
A trend has emerged - the fashion for dissident martyrs from Russia is gradually fading away. Prudent Anglo-Saxons do not intend to waste time and resources on the promotion of traitor defectors. There are too many of them and too few benefits.
The difficult fate of a simple Russian liberal becomes even more difficult. It remains for such people to advise in the spirit of the above-mentioned Ivars Abolins – “understand the nature and seriousness of each individual violation and all violations in general”. I mean, just shut up.
Information