The Pentagon is considering the possibility of supplying Ukraine with small-sized precision bombs GLSDB

98
The Pentagon is considering the possibility of supplying Ukraine with small-sized precision bombs GLSDB

The American company Boeing offered the Pentagon to organize the delivery to Ukraine of small-sized high-precision bombs, the so-called ground-launched small-caliber bombs GLSDB (Ground Launched Small Diameter Bomb). This is reported by Reuters, citing sources in the military industry.

According to the agency, the Pentagon received an offer from Boeing, which is the developer of the GLSDB, and is currently considering the possibility of supplying these munitions to Ukraine. The company itself is ready for the mass production of this ammunition, which allows striking at a considerable distance without using aviation.



In fact, the GLSDB (Ground Launched Small Diameter Bomb) is a GBU-39В SDB small-sized guided aerial bomb used as the warhead of the M227 unguided 26-mm rocket for the M270 MLRS MLRS. The ammunition is launched from the same MLRS, at the highest point the bomb is separated from the rocket and then glides to the target, as if dropped from an aircraft. The range is stated at 160 km.

The Armed Forces of Ukraine are armed with launchers for the use of GLSDB, these are the same MLRS HIMARS or M270 MLRS, supplied by European countries. Boeing proposes to start deliveries in the spring of 2023. However, this proposal runs into several problems that need to be addressed. Firstly, the US is not accustomed to concluding contracts immediately, the Pentagon needs to study the offers of other suppliers, compare prices, etc. Secondly, mass production of these bombs requires several suppliers to speed up the provision of parts and services, which is not currently possible. And, thirdly, the United States consistently opposes the supply of long-range missiles to Ukraine for the same HIMARS, fearing that Kyiv will begin to strike deep into Russian territory.
98 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    28 November 2022 11: 39
    Yes, for the next super waffle, the striped ones found a training ground for advertising the product.
    1. +3
      28 November 2022 11: 42
      Quote from uprun
      Yes, for the next super waffle, the striped ones found a training ground for advertising the product.

      Test - advertising - brand, buy the lads "product".
      1. +10
        28 November 2022 11: 57
        So interesting, but what about the supply of our titanium for Boeing?
        1. +1
          28 November 2022 12: 35
          Quote: Evil543
          So interesting, but what about the supply of our titanium for Boeing?

          I just wanted to write about it
          The Pentagon received an offer from Boeing, which is the developer of the GLSDB, and is currently considering the possibility of supplying these munitions to Ukraine.

          There is simply no way to find out, to stop all deliveries for this Bueng, so that they would be subject to penalties from all customers! And then you see, they decided to test their devices in combat conditions on our soldiers, ungrateful pigs! (sorry for the semi-formatted vocabulary)
          1. +9
            28 November 2022 12: 58
            Quote: Starover_Z
            I just wanted to write about it

            Have you been banned on Google? Use Yandex.

            Boeing stopped deliveries from AVISMA at the beginning of the year. Yes, and AVISMA itself has problems - raw materials "for all these 8 years" came from Ukraine. Now they are being purchased in Africa, but so far the sanctions have not reached them. And they didn’t get there because Airbus, unlike Boeing, is still working with them, so the French asked not to complicate things.
        2. +1
          28 November 2022 13: 07
          Quote: Evil543
          So interesting, but what about the supply of our titanium for Boeing?

          Boeing officially announced the suspension of purchases of Russian titanium back in March 2022. According to The Wall Street Journal, Boeing received about a third of the required amount of titanium from Russia. The remaining deliveries are made from the USA, Japan, China and Kazakhstan. However, it was in the production of civil aircraft that the share of use of Russian titanium was higher. (There is no data on the fate of the joint venture with VSMPO-Avisma - Ural Boeing Manufacturing (UBM) in the Sverdlovsk Region.)
          1. -3
            28 November 2022 13: 55
            Other deliveries are made from the USA, Japan, China and Kazakhstan

            The news was recently that Boeing, instead of buying titanium from the Russian Federation, will buy the same volume from Japan. Yeah. Where does titanium come from in Japan? wassat
            The joke is that the Russian Federation sells titanium in Japan.
            Oh, this Boeing, oh, these fairy tales. lol
            1. +7
              28 November 2022 15: 30
              Quote from stelltok
              . Where does titanium come from in Japan?

              In addition to Russia, there are many deposits around the world. India, Australia, China and South Africa (even Ukraine has one) lead in titanium mining, while the United States, Japan, China and Russia take priority in processing and smelting.
              1. +1
                28 November 2022 19: 55
                1) So the product will be more expensive. The cost of goods produced in Japan is higher than in the Russian Federation. The Japanese are now the price is bent.
                2) Shoulder delivery and logistics from Russia to Japan - cheaper than other options.
                Boeing is losing.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. +1
                    28 November 2022 21: 56
                    They will agree on wholesale and long-term supplies, guarantee demand and receive economic preferences.

                    Well, of course. The US knows how to squeeze its allies dry.
                    They are number 1 in this.
                    I have no doubt that Boeing knows what they are doing.

                    So knows that Airbus took first place in sales, and sales of the Boeing fell sharply.
                    And you continue to dream that everything in the world without the Russian Federation will fall apart and everyone will starve and die))

                    I didn't say a word about it.
                    You seem to want to believe in something.
              2. -1
                28 November 2022 23: 49
                Does Avisma sell titanium in the form of raw materials there? Not finished products?
        3. -1
          28 November 2022 17: 18
          Let's hope the answer isn't price cuts and more deliveries to Boeing! The ruling liberda is ready to do anything to increase profits.
    2. 0
      28 November 2022 11: 45
      Quote from uprun
      Yes, for the next super waffle, the striped ones found a training ground for advertising the product.

      It would be more correct to say so, thanks to the "wise" foreign policy of the Russian Federation, Ukraine and the border regions of the Russian Federation will become a testing ground for weapons of the NATO countries.
    3. 0
      28 November 2022 11: 48
      Don't say anything, Boeing's smart move.
      Given that they had a failure with the latest aircraft models and, accordingly, their profits decreased, they decided to earn extra money on other products, since they pay for it in hard currency.
      1. 0
        28 November 2022 11: 57
        jackals grabbed, everything that is possible now in Rus' will be tried.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
    4. 9PA
      +2
      28 November 2022 14: 45
      Superwafer is Burogozin, and this bomb is a weapon with high efficiency
    5. +9
      29 November 2022 17: 20
      There is an indirect war going on between the USA and Russia. And Ukraine, the stake in this war.
  2. +6
    28 November 2022 11: 43
    With this bomb, the question is of course an interesting one, they cutely called it a bomb, or more precisely called it. A rocket to
    200 km, more precisely! 93 kg of explosives are not sickly. Inventors. This means that a bonba with a radius of more than 500 km will soon appear.
    1. +1
      28 November 2022 11: 47
      Quote: tralflot1832
      This means that a bonba with a radius of more than 500 km will soon appear.

      While up to 300 km appears, this agreement on missile weapons has never been violated.
      1. +2
        28 November 2022 11: 49
        Well, it has not been violated yet. They will violate it in the lung.
        1. +3
          28 November 2022 11: 57
          Quote: tralflot1832
          Well, it has not been violated yet. They will violate it in the lung.

          I have no doubt that they will violate it, but later.)))) Russia, China, Iran, etc. after all, they can also supply such weapons to third countries, I think for this reason the contract has not yet been violated.
        2. KCA
          +3
          28 November 2022 12: 02
          So Russia can also violate the treaty, Iran will be very happy with the Onyxes and Zircons, they are not very good with anti-ship missiles, and Kim can be fitted with something funny, and in general there are many who want to buy Russian missiles.
          1. +2
            28 November 2022 12: 51
            Quote: KCA
            So Russia can also violate the treaty, ...

            Well, that's what I'm writing about. However, it is also not profitable for the Russian Federation to be the first to violate the treaty, because long-range missiles will appear in Ukraine, the Baltic States, Poland, etc. etc.
            1. +3
              28 November 2022 13: 43
              In this case, the Russian Federation needs to look for an opportunity to place its own in Latin America, to return to Cuba, to Nicaragua. Now the initiative is behind them, They violate, we are afraid that they violated even more and do not answer.
              1. +2
                28 November 2022 14: 09
                Quote: IvanIvanov
                In this case, the Russian Federation needs to look for an opportunity to place its own in Latin America, to return to Cuba, to Nicaragua.

                If the word "Russian Federation" were replaced by the word "USSR", then it would be so, but the Russian Federation ... The Russian Federation will never do this.
      2. +3
        28 November 2022 12: 09
        Quote: aleksejkabanets

        While up to 300 km appears, this agreement on missile weapons has never been violated.

        2 August 2019 year discontinued action Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles (INF).
        1. +2
          28 November 2022 13: 00
          Quote from cold wind
          The Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range Missiles (INF) has been terminated.

          The RIAC has nothing to do with it. For themselves, Americans can develop anything, but they can SELL (or transfer) only up to 300 km. These are not only agreements, but also internal American laws. They can be canceled by themselves, but have not yet been canceled.
        2. KCA
          -1
          28 November 2022 13: 09
          This is not the INF Treaty, but a treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons and missile technologies
      3. +2
        28 November 2022 15: 02
        The informal agreement on the 300 km limit applies to countries that are not members of the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) and is intended to prevent the spread of missile technology to countries that do not have them.
        For countries participating in the MTCR, there is no such restriction. Therefore, for example, the States supply Tomahawks to England, both MTCR member countries.
        In total, MTCR includes 35 countries, almost all technologically advanced, except for China and Israel. India was the last to join in 2016.
        China, Israel, Romania, and Slovakia did not join the regime, but pledged to comply with its demands.
        Ukraine joined the MTCR in 1998, so the restriction does not apply to it.
    2. +3
      28 November 2022 11: 51
      Actually, more like a mortar mine
      1. 0
        28 November 2022 11: 54
        Can I call it that, is an ICBM also a mortar mine? Verbal casuistry already begins here.
      2. +8
        28 November 2022 11: 56
        No, it's more like a two-stage rocket.
        The MLRS rocket throws a bomb to the maximum height in the direction of the target. Then it separates from the body of the rocket, releases wings and stabilizers and glides independently using GPS.
        1. +4
          28 November 2022 13: 02
          Quote: voyaka uh
          No, it's more like a two-stage rocket

          This is a rocket with a planning warhead. Economy version of the cartoon Vanguard.
    3. D16
      -2
      28 November 2022 12: 38
      So soon there will be a bonba with a radius of more than 500 km

      Hardly. This thing has a speed-to-range trade-off and a predictable flight path that makes it food for any air defense system, including new MANPADS. IMHO only against IKGSN there are chances, and even that is not a fact. As a weapon of terror of undisguised civilian objects, it will do, but nothing more.
      1. +4
        28 November 2022 13: 17
        Quote: D16
        This thing has a speed-to-range trade-off and a predictable flight path that makes it the food for any air defense system, including new MANPADS. IMHO only against IKGSN there are chances, and even that is not a fact. How terror weapons of undisguised civilian objects will go

        Just this thing has a lot of potential. It flies quite quickly, silently, does not glow in the IR, it enters the target almost vertically. Plus, it can be launched in batches and, accordingly, overload any air defense. There are variants capable of hitting moving targets.
        1. D16
          -1
          28 November 2022 14: 37
          The arrival speed is about 360 km/h. In the presence of a large wing, which increases vulnerability, at the expense of IR stealth is also not a fact. Still, it accelerates the engine from the Chimera, and this is supersonic, so it will have time to warm up. Chimera is much faster, more inconspicuous in the radar range and also comes in batches. Versions with radar and IR guidance are even more expensive with the same vulnerability
          1. +1
            28 November 2022 14: 44
            Quote: D16
            The arrival speed is about 360 km/h. In the presence of a large wing, which increases vulnerability, at the expense of IR stealth is also not a fact. Still, it accelerates the engine from the Chimera, and this is supersonic, so it has time to warm up

            That is, all these indicators are much better than Geranium with Lancet. And even all sorts of answers to Helfaer.
            1. D16
              +1
              28 November 2022 18: 05
              That is, all these indicators are much better than Geranium with Lancet

              What indicators? Geranium has a range of more than a thousand miles at a minimum altitude. She can plan a route bypassing air defense systems, and with a strong desire to arrange at least a stellar raid on a worthy target. And for little money. You can launch a lancet at least from their trenches and bring it down even more difficult. The GLSBD starts as a MLRS, respectively, jumps 20 kilometers up into rarefied air and flies in ballistics, shining on the entire district until the speed becomes very subsonic. Then he will open his wings and begin to plan. At the same time, both Buk and Shell will shoot them down without problems.
              all sorts of answers to Helfaer.

              What are you talking about? Hellfire air-to-ground.
              1. +1
                28 November 2022 18: 18
                Quote: D16
                What indicators?

                visibility indicators.
                Quote: D16
                more than a thousand miles at a minimum height.

                In order for the SDB to have such a range, it must be attached to the aircraft. So far, only 150 km have been approved.
                Quote: D16
                At the same time, both Buk and Shell will shoot them down without problems.

                The first will be shot down (although this is not so simple), and the 12th is not a fact.
                1. D16
                  -2
                  28 November 2022 19: 48
                  visibility indicators.

                  Geranium and Lancet crawl above the ground. They are, by definition, harder to detect with radar. The lancet is electric and should not glow in the IR range. Judging by the videos for MANPADS, Geranium is also not a gift. In general, that Geranium, that the Lancet of a wunderwaffe in relation to dill air defense. GLSBD will be a nightmare for uncovered settlements, and militarily they will not affect anything.
                  1. +1
                    29 November 2022 11: 49
                    As well as Javelins, and 777, and Hymars. These won't work either. You can always build on the base another 300 new units. Or are we not playing StarCraft?
              2. +1
                28 November 2022 23: 57
                Is there at least one evidence of how a shell or a torus shot down a chimera? The wings are small there, it is essentially a planning bomb, it will be extremely difficult to bring it down.
                1. D16
                  0
                  29 November 2022 09: 36
                  Crew interview and video from the Shell cockpit. It works well on ballistic targets. I didn't see anything about Thor. Chimera projectiles have no wings. There are small control surfaces. Almost a dwarf Eskander lol .
      2. +2
        28 November 2022 15: 06
        predictable flight path

        and how predictable if the bomb is controlled?
        1. D16
          -1
          28 November 2022 18: 22
          Although it is planning, it is still a bomb. Its aerodynamic quality is slightly better than a bomb without wings. Therefore, it can correct the flight path, removing the guidance error, but not dodge air defense systems.
          1. +1
            29 November 2022 01: 02
            It is fundamentally different from the classic bomb. You probably have a very poor idea of ​​the capabilities of modern glide bombs.
            Do you know how far planning bombs can fly from a drop point?
            In this particular case, this GLSDB is said to be based on the GBU-39 Small Diameter Bomb.
            That's what she looks like.

            When dropped from a height of 10 km, the GBU-39 is capable of flying to a distance of 110 km at speeds up to 2M.
            With this application, the range and speed will probably be smaller, but still very decent.
            And it's very hard to knock her down.
            In addition to accuracy, the main advantage of the GBU-39 is stealth: with a length of 1,8 m and a body diameter of 0,19 m, the bomb has an RCS of about 0,015 m2, which makes it difficult to repel a massive strike with such means using air defense systems [4].
            1. D16
              0
              29 November 2022 09: 21
              Mach two is the maximum drop speed from an aircraft. The bomb on it, if it flies, does not last long. We still need to find a plane that will drop it at such a speed. Further, it will fly along the most optimal trajectory, and each rudder deviation will eat up kilometers of range. Actually, the GBSBD flies one and a half times further just because the M26 throws it 20 kilometers into thinner air at a comparable speed at the time of separation. The MiG-25RB at one time notably threw cast iron from a cabriolet in similar conditions.
              1. 0
                29 November 2022 10: 19
                this bomb definitely does not fly in a predictable ballistic trajectory
                Although it is planning, it is still a bomb. Its aerodynamic quality is slightly better than a bomb without wings. Therefore, it can correct the flight path, removing the guidance error

                compared to a free-falling bomb, heaven and earth.
                1. D16
                  0
                  29 November 2022 17: 42
                  that bomb definitely does not fly in a predictable ballistic trajectory

                  Without an engine with a specific load of the order of half a ton per sq.m. it will not be possible to express. Any maneuver reduces speed and, accordingly, range. And this bomb was created in order not to enter the enemy's air defense zone, that is, to work from a maximum distance. It's not a free-falling bomb, but it's not a plane either.
                  1. -1
                    30 November 2022 00: 56
                    Any maneuver reduces speed and, accordingly, range.

                    far from always the blow is delivered to the maximum range of the ammunition.
                    that is, to work from a maximum distance

                    far from necessary.
                    It's not a free-falling bomb, but it's not a plane either.

                    of course not a plane, it's a bomb. But unlike a free-falling one, it has an unpredictable trajectory (and a target, by the way)
          2. +1
            29 November 2022 11: 46
            And why should she dodge air defense systems? It's cheap and small. 20 pieces of inconspicuous targets will fly in, shoot them down.
            1. D16
              -2
              29 November 2022 17: 43
              Chimeras shoot down, and there are completely different speeds.
              1. +1
                29 November 2022 23: 17
                So where does the speed? Is speed the only characteristic? If there are 6-12-24 such bombs in one salvo and the radar detects them at a distance of a couple of kilometers, one can not even dream of any interception.
    4. 0
      29 November 2022 04: 04
      Quote: tralflot1832
      , they cutely called her a bomb, or to be more precise.

      Gliding warhead on a 227 mm caliber rocket.
  3. -2
    28 November 2022 11: 49
    The American company Boeing offered the Pentagon to organize the delivery to Ukraine of small-sized high-precision bombs, the so-called small-caliber bombs launched from the ground.
    . Wow, but one would think that they don’t know that the Kukuevskys have a completely sour situation with aviation ...
    And so, minke whales created / provoked a conflict, where you can really test a significant part of weapons, systems, in real combat conditions.
  4. +3
    28 November 2022 11: 51
    The MLRS rocket becomes two-stage.
    The warhead turns into the second stage - a planning bomb.
    1. D16
      +2
      28 November 2022 12: 10
      The warhead turns into the second stage - a planning bomb

      Just a detachable warhead. The concept of "stage" implies the presence of an engine, but the bomb in this version does not have it.
      1. 0
        28 November 2022 13: 20
        Quote: D16
        The concept of "stage" implies the presence of an engine, but the bomb in this version does not have it.
        I wonder if she has bottom gas generator like the Excalibur projectile? (it increases flight range by 20-35%)
        https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Донный_газогенератор
        1. +5
          28 November 2022 13: 48
          What for?
          The bottom gas generator is needed by the projectile. It has high speed and a flat bottom, which creates a low pressure area behind the projectile and greatly slows it down. The gas generator does not so much push the projectile forward with a jet stream as it saturates this bubble with gas.

          The bomb goes slower and has more favorable aerodynamics.
          1. 0
            28 November 2022 15: 16
            Quote: Negro
            The bomb goes slower and has more favorable aerodynamics.
            Thanks for the answer (+) somehow I didn’t know about the speed right away))
            Something lately there have been too many miracles in the 404th, just a training ground for expired weapons. Yesterday I watched the stream of "Small" from BARS-8/14, and he suddenly gave out pearls saying that he saw a couple of craters from ... "Poplar" BUT with a high-explosive part. I'm talking about such disposal overdue I didn’t even think about it, I thought they were only intended for nuclear weapons. One can’t believe it all - the trajectory is “ballistic”, the hour of the “non-partners” is not even, what they think ... IMHO: he probably got it all wrong ...
            1. 0
              28 November 2022 15: 28
              Tales. The minimum range of ICBMs is in no way less than 2 thousand km - Topol had to be launched from Plesetsk in order to hit Mariupol. And the nix would be incredible, you can’t hide this.
              1. 0
                28 November 2022 17: 17
                Yes, my own eyes on my forehead from this "Freudian slip" climbed lol
                exact reference to 1h.47m.
                https://youtu.be/FYvXgH_Fnw0?t=6420
                PS I just "listened in the background" while working on a PC and then ... I even listened to this place again, I thought I misheard ... wassat
            2. D16
              +1
              28 November 2022 22: 36
              somehow I didn’t know about speed right away))

              This bomb is accelerated by the standard M26 engine, and it throws the rocket 20 km at a speed of Mach 2-3. So it's not so clear laughing . But unlike US, SBD is made according to the normal aerodynamic scheme. In its tail section there are control surfaces with steering machines. Therefore, there is most likely no place for the bottom GG. There, moreover, that in the aviation version she does not need it.
        2. D16
          0
          28 November 2022 14: 41
          I have not heard that they would try to cross an air bomb with an artillery shell.
    2. +6
      28 November 2022 12: 12
      An interesting decision. They take a serial rocket booster, a serial glide bomb, receive ammunition for serial MLRS that qualitatively increases their capabilities.
  5. 0
    28 November 2022 11: 52
    The interest of Boeing is understandable - money is not superfluous. But here it turns out that American bureaucracy intervened, and so far everything has hung. Let's hope it stays in limbo.
    1. -1
      28 November 2022 12: 10
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Let's hope it stays in limbo.

      And what are the reasons? For such hopes?
      Here is what can be understood from this set of words - "The Pentagon needs to study offers from other suppliers, compare prices, etc. Secondly, for the mass production of these bombs, it is necessary that several suppliers accelerate the provision of parts and services at once, and this is currently And, thirdly, the United States consistently opposes the supply of long-range missiles to Ukraine for the same HIMARS, fearing that Kyiv will begin to strike deep into Russian territory"?
      So many suppliers one products? What do you need to compare prices for months?
      And what does impossible mean? Unable to speed up the production process and output? For a US company? Did the author confuse the States with Russia by chance?
      And it was about the paused delivery of missiles with a range of about 300 km. But what document says about the ban on deliveries to weapons with a range of 150-160 km?
      1. +1
        28 November 2022 13: 32
        Quote from: skeptick2
        The Pentagon needs to look at offers from other suppliers, compare prices, and so on.

        It's already been done. Boeing offered this option for the current M142/270 range extension program, but the military ordered a new conventional design missile from LM for a carload of money. The budget will not take care of itself. Boeing / Saab offered this thing in different countries, but for one reason or another, no one took it. But for Ukraine it just looks attractive.
        Quote from: skeptick2
        Secondly, for the mass production of these bombs it is necessary,

        Mass is not required, they are already produced by the thousands.
        Quote from: skeptick2
        consistently oppose the supply of long-range missiles to Ukraine for the same HIMARS

        The US does not provide 300 km missiles, but supplies 150 km AGM-88s. So GLSDB just looks like a good compromise, since it does not cross new "red lines" in any way, but costs 20 times cheaper than AGM-88.
        1. +1
          29 November 2022 08: 25
          Quote: Negro
          So GLSDB just looks like a good compromise, since it does not cross new "red lines" in any way, but costs 20 times cheaper than AGM-88.

          GLSDB prices start at $40.
          Depending on the guidance systems, the cost can skyrocket. I saw contracts where the cost of this bomb was more than 200 thousand dollars per unit.
          In a particular case, the cost of the rocket and the adapter block should be added to the cost of the bomb.
          It is unlikely that as a result it will be cheaper than the standard controlled Himars.
          1. +2
            29 November 2022 08: 36
            Quote: SergeyB
            It is unlikely that as a result it will be cheaper than the standard controlled Himars.

            The standard design involves the use of not M30 / 31, but M26, which are for recycling. With the M30 / 31, the range should be even higher, but it seems that this has not yet been offered. The notional glide bomb adds 100 km of range to a standard missile.

            200K cost bombs from pre-production batches. Now both SDB and SDB2 are below 100.
  6. 0
    28 November 2022 11: 56
    The Pentagon is considering the possibility of supplying...

    I, like many others, was more interested in Washington considering the issue how to deliver to Ukraine.
  7. +2
    28 November 2022 11: 58
    If they get it, they will beat them in the Crimea, Kursk, I generally keep quiet about Belgorod. Then you will have to respond stupidly in response to the cities, Kyiv, Lviv, in the first place. Meat grinder for American money...
    1. +1
      28 November 2022 13: 41
      Quote: Glagol1
      Crimea, Kursk, I generally keep quiet about Belgorod

      Well, actually, only Dzhankoy and Bryansk will be added from the new ones. Khaimars get to Kursk or Lugansk anyway, Sevastopol, Kerch, Voronezh, Rostov-on-Don, on the contrary, are too far away. Bye.
  8. -1
    28 November 2022 12: 12
    Apparently it is necessary to use large-sized nuclear bombs and put an end to the Nazis in Ukraine.
    1. -1
      28 November 2022 12: 16
      We have nuclear bombs only in Fashington, then there will be a result. It will be later! They may ask for it.
      1. -2
        28 November 2022 12: 48
        If there is a nuclear bomb on Washington, and it is doubtful that it will ever fall there, then the destruction of Russia will follow. The non-use of nuclear bombs in Ukraine will also lead to the destruction of Russia. So a nuclear strike should be on Ukraine.
  9. +2
    28 November 2022 12: 27
    It will be difficult to shoot them down, because. the bomb will not fall in a ballistic trajectory. IT was made specifically to break through our air defense ..... F15EX can carry 20 pieces of these
    1. +1
      28 November 2022 13: 28
      In the sense of an EPR for low-power air defense radars, 100 kg bombs can be difficult to detect, but if you find it is not difficult to shoot down, it is clearly not very fast due to the wings and the corresponding aerodynamics
      1. -1
        30 November 2022 01: 01
        The speed can be up to 2M, depending on the speed of the carrier at the time of release, altitude and range to the target.
  10. +1
    28 November 2022 13: 06
    Fine. We are Boeing metal, they are shells for Ukraine. Who squealed what kind of proceeds from metal and other raw materials supplied to NATO countries, we are doing our own. Some kind of .... So here we are, it turns out, we help to make shells with which they fire at the Russian army, territory.
  11. 0
    28 November 2022 13: 24
    more interestingly, they shoved a planning bomb of the fab-100 level into the Hymars caliber, which means you can answer with the fab-250 level into the tornado caliber)
    1. +1
      29 November 2022 00: 02
      For aviation, they cannot make a planning bomb, but you are talking about a tornado ... They are trying to make a UAV projectile for a tornado. In short, the design idea works in the wrong direction.
  12. -1
    28 November 2022 13: 45
    Maybe this will finally be the signal to wipe the infrastructure to zero. You can use old non-nuclear poplars. The warhead there is significantly higher than the Iskander one.
  13. 0
    28 November 2022 14: 05
    The ammunition is launched from the same MLRS, at the highest point the bomb is separated from the rocket and then glides to the target, as if dropped from an aircraft. The range is declared at 160 km.

    Do we have something similar?
    1. 0
      30 November 2022 13: 05
      Good afternoon!
      Do we have something similar?
      You are asking the wrong question! Does Iran have something similar))? The Iranians seem to have planning guided bombs ...
  14. 0
    28 November 2022 14: 27
    Quote: Starover_Z
    Quote: Evil543
    So interesting, but what about the supply of our titanium for Boeing?

    I just wanted to write about it
    The Pentagon received an offer from Boeing, which is the developer of the GLSDB, and is currently considering the possibility of supplying these munitions to Ukraine.

    There is simply no way to find out, to stop all deliveries for this Bueng, so that they would be subject to penalties from all customers! And then you see, they decided to test their devices in combat conditions on our soldiers, ungrateful pigs! (sorry for the semi-formatted vocabulary)

    Let's see if our party at the feeder will give up babosiks or will they still wait for bombing on their heads!
  15. 0
    28 November 2022 16: 36
    it is a pity that these products will hit the Russian soldiers and the Russian Federation will do something about it?
    1. -1
      28 November 2022 19: 27
      A pair of geraniums will not yield in power, having a much larger radius, and also cheaper.
  16. 0
    29 November 2022 02: 05
    Quote from solar
    When dropped from a height of 10 km, the GBU-39 is capable of flying to a distance of 110 km at speeds up to 2M.

    Looks like a lie about 2M. In a free fall from 10 km in a vacuum, the body will accelerate to about 450 m/s. It is clear that planning it will be much slower.
    1. 0
      29 November 2022 08: 35
      Quote: acetophenon
      Looks like a lie about 2M. In a free fall from 10 km in a vacuum, the body will accelerate to about 450 m/s. It is clear that planning it will be much slower.

      Конечно.
      The speed of 2 M, she will have only at the moment of separation from the aircraft. Provided that the aircraft has a speed of 2 M. Then the speed will drop rapidly.
      At the final stretch, the speed is likely to be no higher than 100 km/h.
      1. -1
        30 November 2022 01: 09
        Yes, in general, it will stop and hang in the air, a common thing when you fall from a great height.
    2. -1
      30 November 2022 01: 07
      Add the media speed at the time of reset. A further change in speed will depend on the distance to the target and the drop height.
  17. 0
    29 November 2022 11: 39
    We are waiting for a review article about these GLSDB in the spirit: little, bad, will not help
  18. 0
    29 November 2022 12: 06
    Quote: Evil543
    So interesting, but what about the supply of our titanium for Boeing?

    Everything is great with supplies. Employees of the company go on business trips and feel good in European offices.
  19. 0
    29 November 2022 12: 20
    And the conclusion?
    Will we do something similar cheaper and better?
    Or shall we shout three times death am and four times America bucket?
    1. 0
      29 November 2022 18: 25
      The GLONASS-correction module "Dynamics" developed by "Compass" was developed ... "It is screwed in" in place of the fuse for artillery shells, mortar mines, air bombs ...
  20. 0
    29 November 2022 12: 53
    Quote: D16
    I have not heard that they would try to cross an air bomb with an artillery shell.

    The Americans, during the Second World War, made a gun that fired aerial bombs - 900 mm, if I remember correctly.
  21. 0
    29 November 2022 18: 28
    Suggested translation...GLSDB- "Voice of a moron"!