US intelligence suspects North Korea of ​​supplying artillery shells to Russia for use in the NWO

109
US intelligence suspects North Korea of ​​supplying artillery shells to Russia for use in the NWO

North Korea has been secretly supplying artillery shells to Russia in "significant" volumes. This statement was made by the coordinator of the National Security Council for strategic communications, John Kirby.

Speaking at a regular briefing, Kirby said that the United States allegedly has information about the supply of artillery shells to Russia by the DPRK. According to a White House spokesman, the shells are supplied for use in Ukraine, the volumes of deliveries are "significant", and they themselves are disguised as deliveries to countries in North Africa and the Middle East. US intelligence is closely monitoring these shipments and waiting for these shells to "surface" in Ukraine.



We have evidence that the DPRK is secretly supplying significant amounts of artillery shells to Russia for the war in Ukraine

- said Kirby, but traditionally did not provide evidence.

At the same time, CNN claims that according to intelligence, the DPRK has already supplied weapon Russia, but American intelligence does not have data on what, in what quantities and how much Russia paid for it. In general, everything is at the level of rumors. However, Washington set the task of accusing Russia's allies of supplying weapons to the Russian special operation, thereby justifying its own supplies to Ukraine. Legs grow from here and about the alleged deliveries of Iranian ballistic missiles to Russia and drones, moreover, Ukrainian intelligence is extracting information at an accelerated pace, and without leaving their offices. The masters send down a summons from above, according to which the GRU writes reports.

Neither Washington nor Brussels accepts the option that Russia has the required number of both missiles and artillery shells. The machine was launched on charges and it should work, and on what information, this is no longer important. The most important thing is that they should be believed by the Western citizen, and the mention of the DPRK and Iran in the context of arms supplies will undoubtedly arouse such interest.
109 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    2 November 2022 19: 28
    Some nonsense.
    However, nothing is surprising these days.
    1. -1
      2 November 2022 19: 49
      Is North Korea's industry more powerful than Russia's?
      1. +18
        2 November 2022 20: 00
        I’ll be surprised - they have more shells, and the guns shoot further and the soldiers serve longer and the snipers are a whole company, or even more
        1. 0
          3 November 2022 13: 15
          Already in training, the local soldiers know how to jump on a trolley bus. Just don't ask where the trolleybuses come from in North Korea
          1. +3
            3 November 2022 13: 19
            The Pyongyang Trolleybus Plant is a machine-building enterprise of the DPRK, the country's largest manufacturer of trolleybuses.
            https://is.gd/VhfaiA
      2. +18
        2 November 2022 20: 06
        They have conventional weapons there (and of course BP) like a damn cloud has accumulated, why not?
      3. +8
        2 November 2022 20: 07
        Quote: seregatara1969
        Is North Korea's industry more powerful than Russia's?


        It's just that North Korea is not participating in the conflict and they have extra ammunition.
        1. +5
          2 November 2022 21: 10
          fellow There is never a lot of ammunition, sometimes there is nowhere to store it ..
        2. 0
          2 November 2022 22: 54
          Also how to participate. They have a war there at any moment can begin. They live there like on a powder keg. They themselves will desperately need shells soon. I doubt that they will agree to give something.
          1. +1
            3 November 2022 19: 00
            Quote: Pavel_Sveshnikov
            I doubt that they will agree to give something.

            They sell! If supplied of course. There is nothing shameful in this for Russia: in love and in war, all means are good! wink
      4. +1
        2 November 2022 20: 27
        Quote: seregatara1969
        Is North Korea's industry more powerful than Russia's?

        I wouldn't be surprised if that's the case now.
        1. -8
          2 November 2022 21: 57
          I wouldn't be surprised if you're not right in the head.
      5. +6
        2 November 2022 20: 52
        The exclusive right of an "exceptional" nation is to say exceptional nasty things so that exceptional fools listen to them when justifying their "exceptional" actions .. hi
      6. +7
        2 November 2022 21: 06
        Quote: seregatara1969
        Is North Korea's industry more powerful than Russia's?

        No. It’s just that their shells do not decrease by 20 thousand tons per day ...
        1. +1
          3 November 2022 09: 25
          20 thousand tons is the weight of five heavy trains with wagons!
          1. +1
            4 November 2022 06: 22
            The unified weight of railway trains is 6300t (this is gross) net weight is usually 4500t.
            1. 0
              4 November 2022 17: 04
              It’s still a lot, you won’t have time to unload, not only to use it up!
            2. 0
              5 November 2022 15: 21
              Until 20000 pcs, not tons shoots a day Russian art
      7. +5
        2 November 2022 21: 08
        Quote: seregatara1969
        Is North Korea's industry more powerful than Russia's?

        Yes, because she is.
      8. +7
        2 November 2022 22: 16
        Quote: seregatara1969
        Is North Korea's industry more powerful than Russia's?

        The North Korean industry will not dispose of artillery ammunition that has a suitable shelf life. And the Russian Federation uses them for their intended purpose ... According to The Military Balance 2021, at present, the KPA ground forces are armed with at least 21,6 thousand artillery systems of all classes. The most numerous are guns and howitzers of various types in towed and self-propelled versions - a total of at least 8600 units. In second place in terms of the number of mortars - approx. 7500 units The number of MLRS is estimated at 5500 units.
        1. +2
          4 November 2022 12: 46
          If the DPRK and Iran supply weapons, then this is good. The weapon itself will come in handy in combat, although things can be more interesting.
          After all, the goals of such treaties are not only military, but also diplomatic.
          For example, this is military-technical cooperation with counter deliveries of something else that will strengthen the partner's defense capability, and this may be geopolitically beneficial.
          Again, this binds a partner, separates from others.

          Iran has not returned to the nuclear deal, which is a reproach to the Biden administration. But Iran, which does not live in a vacuum, is planning something else... It needs Su-35 combat aircraft, which, as they recently wrote, will be delivered to it. There are interests in the oil sector. That is, it is partly reoriented - therefore, an exchange of products in sensitive areas is needed for fruitful relations. And the stronger the bridges with the Westerners are burned there, the more reliable it is at the moment.

          Similar moments with the DPRK. Small but proud should feel their relevance and significance.

          And the weapon itself will come in handy. If you can save your stocks, but for now partially use the purchased ones, then that's great! After all, how many geraniums saved calibers? A lot of.
          And there are also targets for calibers. Moreover, our country has a sea of ​​candy wrappers, which are given in exchange for natural resources. After all, you can still buy something with them ... The example of the fate of foreign exchange reserves is indicative.
      9. +2
        3 November 2022 01: 07
        They also forgot UAVs, ballistic and cruise missiles, everything from there. Here they even forgot how to make shells. As they say: Quod licet Iovi, non licet bovi.
      10. +6
        3 November 2022 02: 16
        We have accumulated ammunition both during the existence of the USSR and during the year of the existence of Russia for more than one such war. When properly maintained, their shelf life is almost indefinite.
        John Kirby needed to blurt out something and gave it away. There are many bases for storing equipment and ammunition in the Far East. They are being cleaned up little by little, the trains are heading west. Here's your "proof"
      11. Mwg
        +2
        3 November 2022 03: 53
        No, it's just that US intelligence is more creative than Ukrainian intelligence. Those, you see, read VO. We were joking here about their previous statement about the supply of shells and missiles from Korea, they read it and decided that the users of the VO resource were right and refused to accuse them of supplying missiles. In short, only shells were left in suspicion)))))))))))))))))))))
    2. +6
      2 November 2022 19: 56
      And the Pindos supply ammunition to the outskirts. Well like 1:1
      1. +13
        2 November 2022 20: 21
        Quote: figvam
        And the Pindos supply ammunition to the outskirts. Well like 1:1

        Yeah. According to the latest data, the Yankees swelled two annual Russian military budgets into the NWO. Not well, there are the Baltic states and Poland, on average, their 25% of annual budgets. Plus, guarantees in exchange for the supplied weapons total 4-5 of the military budget of the Russian Federation for six months from NATO vs One annual budget of the Army of the Russian Federation.
        Not fair. And we still wet them in the toilet
      2. +3
        2 November 2022 20: 38
        Quote: figvam
        And the Pindos supply ammunition to the outskirts. Well like 1:1

        And who supplied Nazi Germany with raw materials, materials and other resources?!
        1. -2
          2 November 2022 22: 26
          Soviet Union, right?
          The text of your comment is too short and in the opinion of the site administration does not carry useful information.
    3. -7
      2 November 2022 19: 58
      Quote: forty-eighth
      Some nonsense.

      This is a clear fake, as well as the supply of supposedly Iranian drones to Russia. The West is trying to mislead.
      1. +2
        2 November 2022 20: 12
        You can still believe in drones, since serious problems with this surfaced in our NWO, and then they decided abruptly. But there were no problems with artillery. Although, if this is a North Korean initiative and if a gift, then why not request But hardly.
        1. +2
          2 November 2022 21: 28
          But there were no problems with artillery

          Didn't you or didn't you hear about them?
          1. +3
            2 November 2022 23: 07
            Quote: alexmach
            Didn't you or didn't you hear about them?

            The second, of course. I apologize for such an absolute character of the statement. However, was there any information about any serious problems specifically with artillery?
            1. +2
              3 November 2022 00: 09
              Timokhin wrote several times in his channel.
              Shell hunger. Today Khodakovsky on the radio said that they do not respond to art. fire, they spend shells only on some specific planned fire missions, and if the Armed Forces of Ukraine simply shoot at forward positions, then you just have to sit under fire. Meanwhile, the previously promised D-1 howitzers (https://t.me/playcivilization/117) mod. 1943 began to arrive in parts of the LPR.
              Shoigu and Gerasimov are great, they were able to.
              The proof is below.

              Let us consider from this point of view the projectile hunger that is rolling up to the Russian Federation.
              It so happened that the "drawdown" of the number of shells, and the mobilization of 300 people in the RF Armed Forces coincided.
              What this is fraught with was well shown by the First World War and the offensive of the Red Army in 1942.
              For those who did not understand, their D-30 howitzers, 122-mm caliber, were taken from the militias and they were given the old 152-mm D-20 in return, because. there has been a shortage of shells for 122-mm barrels, and now it is planned to pick them up as well. the RF Armed Forces are also projected to have a shortage of shells.
              And the militias will probably receive D-1 arr. 1943 with the same caliber but different ballistic solution.
              And a range of 13,7 km.
              1. -3
                3 November 2022 06: 43
                Quote: alexmach
                And the militias will probably receive D-1 arr. 1943 with the same caliber but different ballistic solution.
                And a range of 13,7 km.

                Already received. D-1 model 1943, with her grandfathers took Berlin. Taking into account the counter-battery work of the Kyiv partners, it is dangerous to fight with a range of 13,7 km.


                1. 0
                  5 November 2022 16: 08
                  And they, the Armed Forces of Ukraine, have an intergalactic range, right?
                  1. -5
                    5 November 2022 16: 42
                    Quote: stankow
                    And they, the Armed Forces of Ukraine, have an intergalactic range, right?

                    Howitzer D-20 for 17 km, 777 for 24 km.
                    1. 0
                      7 November 2022 11: 36
                      I assure you, as an artilleryman, it practically does not matter! The difference is insignificant. Especially with those quantities of d-20, m777 and msta-b that are "in the game"
      2. +2
        2 November 2022 21: 22
        Quote: Alexander_Snegirev
        The West is trying to mislead.

        The West made an advertisement for Iranian drones, now it’s the turn of the DPRK (if the Ukrainians confirm the effectiveness, like drones), and someone else may pop up there ... Nicaraguans or
    4. +7
      2 November 2022 20: 03
      Quote: forty-eighth
      Some nonsense.
      However, nothing is surprising these days.

      Here, if you look, it is very very interesting. North Korea at one time transfers missile technology to Iran, which they received from the USSR. Now they say that Iran is giving us a certain amount of OTRK, only the lazy did not talk about winged mopeds.
      Actually the circulation of weapons in nature. The circle will close. Personally, I don't mind if so. Cheaper, more, faster. And most importantly, with built-in GLONASS chips and no sanctions. True, we closed the border with the DPRK. But still! Why Perun is not joking
      1. +8
        2 November 2022 20: 28
        No need to close the circle! We need to continue the spiral. And again to fit the Juche people with something tasty for their part. For they - and the mattress covers really enrage, and the southerners are an affectionate hint that they don’t need to sell weapons to anyone without hitting, and indeed - it seems that the DPRK is our practically only sincere and disinterested friend. And this is worth appreciating in our difficult times ..
        1. +4
          2 November 2022 20: 59
          Quote: paul3390
          and in general - it seems that the DPRK is practically our only sincere and disinterested friend.

          So we officially support the UN sanctions against the DPRK. Alas, they took on such obligations. By the way, taught by such obligations, they imposed on Iran the rest of the "civilized world" deadline for the Iranian deal and the Persians are in front of us and the UN are not a fig not sanctions
        2. +2
          2 November 2022 22: 24
          Yeah, but remember the news about customs?
      2. +4
        3 November 2022 04: 49
        North Korea at one time transfers missile technology to Iran, which they received from the USSR.

        Experts believe that the DPRK received missiles from the Middle East, where it actively supplied weapons, and developed the technologies themselves based on the samples received. North Korean pilots participated in the Middle East wars against Israel.
        True, we closed the border with the DPRK.

        The Koreans closed the border due to covid, but the other day they opened a railway connection. The first train from Russia will carry 30 thoroughbred horses to the DPRK.
    5. +5
      2 November 2022 20: 58
      However, nothing is surprising these days.
      Well, yes, for example, a new anthem is gaining popularity in Estonia
    6. +6
      2 November 2022 23: 24
      Well, even if so, so what? The whole geyropa means I took it for allowance from .. and this is kind of normal. The Koreans have our calibers. Why not change, they are shells and we give them money or some goods. Of course they don't ask me, but I don't mind. And yes, sanctions ... so they invented them, let them carry them out themselves.
  2. -3
    2 November 2022 19: 33
    Well, as it were, military correspondents from our side also report a shortage of shells.
    1. +6
      2 November 2022 19: 38
      Quote: alexmach
      Well, as it were, military correspondents from our side also report a shortage of shells.

      In Balakleya alone, there were shells for the years of the war. Wait a minute, but "your military comrades" - which side is this from ?! belay
      1. -2
        2 November 2022 20: 02
        don't tell me my slippers are in Transnistria until ..... like a fool's shag, but their warranty periods of storage. I won’t be surprised that they will tear in the trunks.
      2. -1
        2 November 2022 21: 24
        In Balakleya alone, there were shells for the years of the war

        Yes, of course, of course. what year of production?
        Wait a minute, but "your military comrades" - which side is this from ?! belay

        Funny, funny.
        but their warranty periods of storage. I won’t be surprised that they will tear in the trunks.

        I think it's more likely that it's the other way around.
    2. +1
      2 November 2022 19: 58
      Quote: alexmach
      Well, as it were, military correspondents from our side also report a shortage of shells.

      That's just from YOUR side and these rumors are coming.
    3. +2
      2 November 2022 20: 27
      What ridiculous nonsense from these alleged "military correspondents"! While our Orions, Armats and PAK FA show the enemy where the crayfish hibernate, they want us to believe that the DPRK is supplying us with shells, and Iran is supplying us with helmets, bulletproof vests and drones!?
  3. +25
    2 November 2022 19: 36
    Even so, what the hell is your business? Both the Russian Federation, and the DPRK and Iran are sovereign countries, and have every right to trade with each other whatever they want. without asking you. And without even notifying. The Westerners are completely emboldened ...
    1. +7
      2 November 2022 20: 14
      Oh no! Russians, North Koreans and Iranians breathe from the same atmosphere as the Americans!!! belay The USA has reliable information! It won't just be left like that! wassat
      1. +6
        2 November 2022 20: 30
        Quote: Plate
        The USA has reliable information! It won't just be left like that!

        Will sanctions be imposed against North Korea? wink
    2. -4
      2 November 2022 21: 10
      Ok. And Ukraine and Poland, Germany, USA, France, Czech Republic, Australia, Turkey are sovereign countries and have every right to trade with each other as they want, without asking anyone. Arms deliveries? Just business, everything is fine wink
  4. +8
    2 November 2022 19: 41
    Well, even if so, so what, the Koreans owe for food and what else we supply there to pay, not won, therefore barter soldier am
  5. +8
    2 November 2022 19: 41
    And if it does, what's the problem? We would have taken their MLRS and sniper groups. The same for Iran. Stop making excuses for us.
  6. +13
    2 November 2022 19: 42
    They say that Koreans do not have much food, but we have a good harvest. So everything should be to mutual satisfaction. drinks
    1. +3
      2 November 2022 20: 44
      Quote: Cat Alexandrovich
      They say that Koreans do not have much food, but we have a good harvest.

      Barter in our time works wonders! True, not everyone likes it. good
  7. -1
    2 November 2022 19: 46
    Well, of course we ran out of ammunition, like they did. Enough for everyone, just sharpen the trunks.
  8. ASM
    +3
    2 November 2022 19: 47
    And who cares about the opinion of some evil spirits?
  9. +4
    2 November 2022 19: 52
    Oh, if only .... But alas, so far these are only dreams ...
    And so you can borrow a complete arsenal from the DPRK, not to mention the fact that this is the only country that can send really trained volunteers. But this requires political will.
    So for now, Iranian UAVs, and in the future, missiles. Also a good help.
    But in the future, if our authorities continue to drive into a corner ... Who knows .. Maybe it will be decided
    1. -1
      3 November 2022 00: 11
      Where are our missiles and drones? Where are our arsenals?
  10. +2
    2 November 2022 19: 57
    It's none of their business who gives us what. sovereign countries. And they do not care about the opinion of the United States with saliva. Or they were worried that with the support of Russia by friendly countries, NATO would lose this war to Russia even faster ...
    Stop making excuses to the pindos who have done so many crimes on the globe that they will burn in hell for their tricks (or in a nuclear explosion, or the Yellow Stone will finally explode). It is time to accuse them more vigorously of all their sins and wherever possible.
  11. +1
    2 November 2022 20: 00
    The DPRK ended its SVO a long time ago, now it’s business, well done
  12. 0
    2 November 2022 20: 04
    It's time to stop "looking back" at NATO + the United States in our international affairs, especially now .... Now on the "agenda" - one question with the expected answer - a decisive victory over NATO and the entry of our armed forces to the border of Poland, Slovakia, Moldova with minimal loss of l \ s and military equipment ...
  13. +2
    2 November 2022 20: 08
    Only Sergey Lavrov comes to mind - stupid people, FUCK
  14. +1
    2 November 2022 20: 09
    Quote: paul3390
    The Westerners are completely emboldened ...

    Well, yes, they have "we are" progressive humanity ", we can"
  15. +1
    2 November 2022 20: 18
    Need to add information.
    Russia also supplies weapons to Afghanistan and Vietnam with Laos.
  16. -5
    2 November 2022 20: 23
    It all started much earlier - even when we stole a machine gun from Schmeiser (ak47). It was not for nothing that Ursula f/dLine accused us of making tanks from kitchen appliances.
    1. +4
      2 November 2022 23: 08
      It all started much earlier - even when we stole a machine gun from Schmeiser (ak47). It was not for nothing that Ursula f/dLine accused us of making tanks from kitchen appliances.

      Since such a conversation began, the whole world stole the wheel from the Sumerians, gunpowder and the compass from the Chinese. And Ursula Vonderleinen is an expert without a doubt. She looked everywhere in her main profession.
    2. +2
      3 November 2022 01: 39
      Dada stole only the similarity purely outwardly, and the differences were the trigger, sear, gas piston, etc. completely different and even better, you still tell a fairy tale that the captive Hugo Schmeisser himself worked for Kalashnikov!
      Yes, where Shlyukhnainen did not stick her snout!
  17. +3
    2 November 2022 20: 25
    The arsenals of North Korea are included in the general reserve component of the PRC in case of a large theater of operations. Everything is accounted for and accounted for. We have enough ammunition. I believe more that we can ask for spare barrels for some artillery, this is possible, but definitely not shells
  18. The comment was deleted.
  19. -2
    2 November 2022 20: 37
    US intelligence suspects North Korea of ​​supplying artillery shells to Russia for use in the NWO

    By replicating such topics and messages, the site assumes the role of a trash can, where all the abomination falls, not worthy of attention or discussion. Little of. If earlier grammatical and sometimes stylistic errors came across in the text, then only in the last two days errors have been made in the headings...
    Tell me, what is the value of such publications and how does this affect the rating of "VO" ...
    Many users have reduced their activity, and some have been overcome by star disease on given topics.
    *****
    Indeed, how important it is today to discuss the nonsense of gray mares and geldings who present themselves as apologists for international law ... Satan's accomplices ...
  20. 0
    2 November 2022 20: 38
    US intelligence suspects North Korea of ​​supplying artillery shells to Russia for use in the NWO
    . The question is ... and the guy rocket Kim, will he be very worried if he is suspected of this ???
  21. +2
    2 November 2022 20: 53
    Russian intelligence suspects these countries of supplying NATO artillery shells for use in NVO

  22. 0
    2 November 2022 21: 01
    Quote: seregatara1969
    Is North Korea's industry more powerful than Russia's?

    Judging by the photo on the Internet, both sides are fighting with Soviet ammunition. But in the DPRK, their production is probably established and there is some oversupply. Although we should have junk for 20 years of war of such intensity.
    1. 0
      3 November 2022 01: 44
      As many here have said in our country, Pridnestrovie has such an arsenal taken out of the former socialist countries, enough to plow half of Europe, after Ukraine!
  23. +2
    2 November 2022 21: 04
    And we suspect America of supplying shells to Ukraine ... moreover, we don’t just suspect, but we know for sure. AND?
  24. +1
    2 November 2022 21: 11
    And what have we already run out of shells?
    On the other hand, to carry artillery shells from the DPRK ... Why not from Antarctica, for example ...
    I hope there is enough solar oil for the operation? ..
  25. 0
    2 November 2022 21: 24
    In general, the DPRK army is powerful, but no one knows how much.
    1. -7
      2 November 2022 22: 31
      In general, the DPRK army is powerful, but no one knows how much.


      Most likely, it is as exaggerated as ours, weaker, less technologically advanced.
    2. 0
      2 November 2022 23: 01
      In general, the DPRK army is powerful, but no one knows how much.

      It's not that bad. The unknown is scary.
  26. 0
    2 November 2022 21: 38
    American intelligence must be very angry. They don’t care who supplies what to Ukraine, but they would like to know who sells a few grenades to Russia? I don’t know how to politely say this, but personally I would like it to be true and the grenades are really Korean. It will make Americans hot. They start to get scared. am
  27. PC
    -4
    2 November 2022 21: 43
    Iran, now North Korea. Who is next?
    1. +1
      2 November 2022 23: 13
      Romania with Greece. Oh, sorry, the United States has been buying there for many years - for ISIS and UGIL
  28. 0
    2 November 2022 21: 47
    Iran - a bunch of years under sanctions - is supplying us with drones and possibly soon missiles.
    North Korea - go nuts as if under sanctions, including ours (you can’t run counter to Western partners) - supplies us with shells.
    for more than 20 years we have not been under sanctions, we have dealt with and squeezed with partners, we have driven and are still chasing raw materials and gold for them, and we invested the pieces of paper received not in our economy but in "reliable financial instruments of partners" - that is, in other pieces of paper. from the age of 14, under sanctions, they began to substitute imports (so successfully that they reduced dependence on imports in a number of areas from 60% of foreign to 80% of the same) and could not do it themselves. I think this legacy of the Soviet past is again to blame. doesn't let go. they want to make a projectile, but it turns out a galosh. In which time after time someone sits down. but Comrade Kim Jong-un will save us. Apparently, even the Juche ideas help more than the idea that there is nothing higher than the dough, and that the behind-the-scenes deal is his prophet.
  29. 0
    2 November 2022 22: 08
    suspects North Korea

    waiting for sanctions?
    and customs says that the exchange of goods between countries has stopped ...
  30. +2
    2 November 2022 22: 19
    I didn’t understand, it means that the Americans can supply weapons to the Nazis in Ukraine, but the DPRK cannot be supplied to Russia.
    1. -4
      2 November 2022 22: 33
      No, this is a blow to the turbo patriots, they say, look: you shot through everything that you had to buy even in distant North Korea.
  31. +2
    2 November 2022 22: 33
    The dibilism of the Americans has hit another bottom. It turned out that the DPRK was transporting shells to North Africa by bulk carriers, allegedly in place of simply transferring them at the land border. Well stupid!!! laughing
    1. 0
      3 November 2022 15: 47
      Quote from Rustic
      The dibilism of the Americans has hit another bottom.

      Well, there is nothing surprising in this.
  32. +2
    2 November 2022 22: 45
    Well, what will these stupid people (USA) do? "anything" - they can just suck, yelp. WHAT these humanoids from the USA can do with an independent country-NOTHING.!!!!!!!!! No matter how tasty dermo seems to be, shit is always shit
  33. +1
    2 November 2022 22: 58
    Speaking at a regular briefing, Kirby said that the United States allegedly has information about the supply of artillery shells to Russia by the DPRK. According to a White House spokesman, the shells are supplied for use in Ukraine, the volumes of deliveries are "significant", and they themselves are disguised as deliveries to countries in North Africa and the Middle East. US intelligence is closely monitoring these shipments and waiting for these shells to "surface" in Ukraine.

    In my opinion, it is easier to transport shells from the DPRK to Russia by land a little through the territory of China, without mentioning Africa.
    1. +1
      3 November 2022 19: 01
      Actually, it's even easier. A railway line passes through the Russia-DPRK border. Take as much as you want.
  34. +2
    2 November 2022 23: 11
    laughing Why not from a warehouse in Transnistria? There's enough for the whole SVO
  35. ASM
    +1
    2 November 2022 23: 16
    That's just the DPRK to the whole n-stan of the tail twirled at the most unsmiling! And if Drk says something else, then the laughter will be heard in Brussels.
  36. 0
    2 November 2022 23: 45
    American intelligence.
    I wonder which one?
    But whatever...
    Is anyone ready to believe that a small country can supply simple weapons to a big power? What kind of weapons? Ammunition. During the war, women and children turned, but now we don’t have those problems.
  37. +2
    3 November 2022 00: 36
    I hope we send them more grain in return, we need to feed the brothers well, and the North Korean workers in Primorye worked great at construction sites, we need to drive the Uzbeks
  38. 0
    3 November 2022 01: 06
    Tsimus is that Western 155 mm shells have almost run out and on the Ruin more and more often empty shell boxes with the markings of Pakistan and ... Iran are found at the positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Of course, the Americans cannot buy directly from Iran, so they most likely buy goods in Lebanon, and from there they are dragged by sea as part of the "grain deal" to Odessa.
  39. 0
    3 November 2022 01: 29
    At the same time, CNN claims that according to intelligence, the DPRK has already supplied weapons to Russia,
    As well as a little-known African tribe eat the living poisoned arrows.
  40. 0
    3 November 2022 03: 34
    And in America, the Indians on the reservations and the president with dementia, let's figure out why the red-skinned indigenous people are not at the helm and why Masons torture grandfather Bidon.
  41. +1
    3 November 2022 04: 47
    of course, of course .. we have BABKI on the bench, more precisely and better, they compose gossip! evidence .. otherwise they got it with another WORK!
  42. +2
    3 November 2022 07: 34
    And we all don't care? A couple of dozen countries are fighting on the side of Ukraine + the purchase of weapons and equipment from neutral countries, and why can't Russia do the same? although I very much doubt that shells and cartridges will be bought on the side, there are too many of them in warehouses. Although there may be separate scarce positions.
    1. +1
      3 November 2022 15: 53
      Quote: Pankrat25
      Too many of them in stock.

      There are never too many shells in a war.
  43. +1
    3 November 2022 08: 33
    I heard the news that after two years, a railway connection was opened between Primorye and the DPRK.
  44. +2
    3 November 2022 08: 53
    According to the latest information (the source is classified), the Russian Armed Forces have purchased weapons in Brazil!!! The tribes of the Amazon signed a contract in blood for the supply of bows, spears and arrows. The first pirogue will come by the new year!
  45. +1
    3 November 2022 16: 45
    Quote: Former soldier

    In my opinion, it is easier to transport shells from the DPRK to Russia by land a little through the territory of China, without mentioning Africa.

    What for? We ourselves have a border with the DPRK in the Far East. And there is a railroad. The river Tumangan (Foggy), a railway bridge passes through it, carry as much as you want and whatever you want.
  46. 0
    4 November 2022 11: 40
    But oh, what does it matter who delivers what to whom, here you stick your nose everywhere.